Vestibular rehabilitation: useful but not universally so.
OBJECTIVE
Although vestibular rehabilitation (VR) is gaining popularity, few data support its utility in improving locomotor stability, and no good predictors exist of whom will benefit most.


METHODS
A double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of vestibular rehabilitation was conducted at a large tertiary care hospital on 124 patients (59 +/- 18 years old) with unilateral (n = 51) or bilateral (n = 73) vestibular hypofunction, of whom 86 completed a 12-week intervention. Of these 86, 27 returned for long-term (1-year) follow-up testing. The primary outcome measure was locomotor stability.


RESULTS
Group A (6 weeks of VR) significantly (P < 0.01) increased their gait velocity and stability compared with group B (6 weeks of strengthening exercise), but there was a smaller difference (P = 0.05) between groups at 12 weeks, when both had had VR; there were no group differences at 1 year. Of the 86 who completed the intervention, 52 (61%) had clear locomotor gains.


CONCLUSIONS
VR is helpful for most patients in providing locomotor stability, but further work is needed to determine the factors that prevent VR from being effective for all patients with vestibulopathy.
Krebs
David E
DE
Biomotion Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129-4557, USA. krebs@helix.mgh.harvard.edu
Gill-Body
Kathleen M
KM
Parker
Stephen W
SW
Ramirez
Jose V
JV
Wernick-Robinson
Mara
M
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002150:Caloric Tests; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D015444:Exercise; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005684:Gait; D020233:Gait Disorders, Neurologic / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012027:Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D014722:Vestibule, Labyrinth / Q000503:physiopathology*