Euthanasia and assisted suicide in the post-Rodriguez era: lessons from foreign jurisdictions.
Euthanasia and assisted suicide are highly controversial subjects that have drawn much attention in Canada over the last two decades. This paper outlines how the Netherlands, the United States, Australia, and Canada have approached the practices. Jurisprudence, public opinion polls, legislative developments, and the positions of medical organizations and their members are included in the analysis. A number of arguments for and against the continued prohibition of the practices in Canada are evaluated. As well, information regarding the extent to which euthanasia and assisted suicide are performed in these countries is assessed. It will be shown that Canadians currently enjoy significant control over decisions concerning end of life. The principles of autonomy and beneficence provide the foundation necessary to justify lifting the prohibition of voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide in Canada. With regard to the development of safeguards, the way in which foreign jurisdictions have dealt with both procedures is highly instructive. A qualified system of pre-authorization, unlike those adopted elsewhere, would prevent abuses from occurring and maintaining the prohibition of non-voluntary and involuntary euthanasia. Since legislators are in the best position to deal with the issues, change in the law should be made by the government, not the judiciary. Practical legislation is feasible and a proposal of what this should entail is presented.
Cormack
M
M
University of British Columbia, Canada.
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D033101:Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D009426:Netherlands; D011639:Public Opinion; D012297:Right to Die; D012952:Societies; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States; D035761:Wedge Argument