[Selected problems of ophthalmological certification in legal proceedings in labour court--own experience].
OBJECTIVE
Analysis of the appeals to the Appeals Labour Court and estimation of visual functions shown in court's decree.


METHODS
248 ophthalmic court's decree were analysed.


RESULTS
In 72% of cases people were qualify as able to work. The most frequent reasons to obtain judgement of disability for labour were: eye injury, high myopia, strabismus, amblyopia, optical nerve atrophy, cataract. 54% persons were monocular.


CONCLUSIONS
The most appeals to the Appeals Labour Court had no sufficient grounds for stating liability for labour.
Sobecki
Roman
R
Kliniki Okulistycznej Centrum Medycznego Kształcenia Podyplomowego w Warszawie.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000550:Amblyopia / Q000175:diagnosis; D002386:Cataract / Q000175:diagnosis; D002648:Child; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005128:Eye Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005131:Eye Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009216:Myopia / Q000175:diagnosis; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D011044:Poland; D013285:Strabismus / Q000175:diagnosis; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation