Bringing the patient back in. Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice.
We challenge assumptions that have guided much research and policy aimed at understanding and reducing medical practice variation. Paramount is the focus on doctors as the cause of variation to the neglect of other possible influences. Some research literature suggests that patients, families, and the community context of practice may also influence treatment decisions. Failure to question present assumptions, despite weak evidence in support of them, may account for inability to explain persistent practice variation, develop appropriate implementable guidelines, or anticipate the effect on treatment decisions of greater patient involvement. In this paper, we discuss the weak response to the NIH Consensus Conference on early stage breast cancer because it may have reflected these problems. We urge a more complex and more empirical approach in explaining treatment choice and guidelines sensitive to the potential for value differences.
Greer
Ann Lennarson
AL
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA.
Goodwin
James S
JS
Freeman
Jean L
JL
Wu
Z Helen
ZH
D001294:Attitude to Health / Q000208:ethnology; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000208:ethnology / Q000601:surgery*; D015975:Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015412:Mastectomy, Segmental; D010358:Patient Participation; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D014481:United States