Scientific composition and review of manuscripts for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
This article provides an extensive tutorial for writers and reviewers involved with the preparation and evaluation of manuscripts submitted for publication in dental journals. The contents were compiled from the Instructions for Authors printed in various peer-reviewed dental journals and from feedback from 10 workshops conducted for the Editorial Review Board of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. The 10 major sections of a scientific manuscript are reviewed in detail in terms of content, format, and common errors; examples of good content are provided. The review process is described, and instructions on conducting fair and expeditious manuscript evaluations are provided for reviewers. In addition, a number of special topics are addressed, including potential conflicts of interest for an author, institutional review of experiments that involve human subjects or animals, and the reproduction of photographs and other images in color versus black and white. In summary, this article presents key guidelines to ensure compliance with the principles of sound scientific writing and the expeditious review of manuscripts prepared for publication in peer-reviewed dental journals.
Bayne
Stephen C
SC
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7450, USA.
McGivney
Glen P
GP
Mazer
Sarah C
SC
D018865:Dental Research / Q000592:standards*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007598:Journalism, Dental / Q000592:standards*; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D014956:Writing / Q000592:standards*