title: Endometrial ablation as an alternative to hysterectomy.
abstract: In the United States, as many as two million women (ie, 22%) each year will consult a physician about menorrhagia (ie, excessive menstrual bleeding). Seven hundred thousand hysterectomies are performed in the United States each year for symptomatic menorrhagia. The procedure cost, risk, and complications, combined with the fact that a large number of posthysterectomy specimens show no abnormality, suggest that the majority of hysterectomies performed for menorrhagia are unnecessary. These data suggest that a less invasive procedure that destroys the endometrial lining but preserves the uterus would be a beneficial procedure for patients with excessive uterine bleeding. Treatment for menorrhagia may include hormone therapy, endometrial curettage, endometrial ablation, and hysterectomy. Women who are opposed to hysterectomy and those for whom other treatment options were unsuccessful can consider ablation rather than hysterectomy.
authors.affiliation: Mt. Carmel St. Ann's Hospital, Westerville, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: Diane D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: League
mesh_terms: D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000451:nursing*; D002404:Catheterization / Q000379:methods; D004598:Electrosurgery / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods / Q000451:nursing; D004717:Endometrium / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006358:Hot Temperature / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008595:Menorrhagia / Q000451:nursing / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D013527:Perioperative Nursing / Q000379:methods; D019564:Unnecessary Procedures