title: [Study on consistency of assessed results according to the Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To explore the consistency of assessed results according to Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity, finding out some factors that influenced appraisal conclusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  102 cases examined by Beijing Institute of Forensic Medicine and Science in 1998 were re-evaluated respectively by nine appraisers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The results showed that distinction of appraisal conclusion between appraisers in the same institute was small, but in different institute was big. The work experience and professional train were important to reduce errors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Standard of Evaluated Injured Severity strong take on character of profession. Veracity of assessed injured severity is related with unitive authoritative explanation, training and experience of appraiser.
authors.affiliation: Beijing Institute of Forensic Medicine and Science, Beijing 100040. lxx8181@sina.com
authors.forename: Xin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Jin-xiang
authors.initials: JX
authors.lastname: Peng
authors.forename: Lin
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chang
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004517:Education, Professional; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000592:standards*; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000193:education* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015599:Trauma Severity Indices