title: Local rectal tumor resection results: gasless, video-endoscopic transanal excision versus the conventional posterior approach.
abstract: This study compares surgical outcomes for local resection of rectal tumors by two approaches: (1) gasless, video-endoscopic transanal-rectal tumor excision (gasless VTEM); and (2) a conventional posterior approach. Gasless VTEM involves a modification of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) that incorporates a standard laparoscopic video camera without a CO(2) insufflation system. A series of 42 patients with 45 rectal tumors (9 adenomas, 36 adenocarcinomas) who underwent gasless VTEM between 1993 and 2000 were studied prospectively. The control group consisted of 26 similar patients who underwent conventional surgery (transsacral or transsphincteric approach) between 1985 and 1993. Age, gender ratio, tumor localization, maximum tumor diameter, and histology for the cases and the controls were similar, whereas operating time and blood loss were significantly greater in the control group (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The postoperative intervals until able to walk, urinary catheter removal, solid food intake, and discharge from hospital were significantly shorter in the gasless VTEM group (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively); analgesic requirements were significantly less (p < 0.001). There was no operative mortality in either group. Postoperative complications developed significantly less frequently in the gasless VTEM group than in the control group (7.1% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.003). During the median follow-up length of 73.3 months, no patient developed tumor recurrence in the gasless VTEM group, whereas one patient did in the control group. In conclusion, gasless VTEM is less invasive and allows shorter hospitalizations and reduced complications than the conventional posterior approach, thereby providing an attractive alternative for selected patients.
authors.affiliation: First Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan. nakagoe@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
authors.forename: Tohru
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Nakagoe
authors.forename: Terumitsu
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sawai
authors.forename: Takashi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tsuji
authors.forename: Shin-ichi
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shibazaki
authors.forename: Masa
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jibiki
authors.forename: Atsushi
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nanashima
authors.forename: Hiroyuki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yamaguchi
authors.forename: Toru
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Yasutake
authors.forename: Hiroyoshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ayabe
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000601:surgery*; D000236:Adenoma / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016099:Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome