title: A mixed bag: the realities of psychoanalytic practice.
abstract: For a variety of reasons, psychoanalytic training is done in somewhat of a vacuum. It teaches a theory and a way of practicing that does not always translate well to day-to-day private practice work. The clinical realities of psychoanalytic practice prove the psychoanalytic method to be one that provides help to a wider audience than classical psychoanalytic training programs might suggest. The psychoanalytic approach offers the analyst many special opportunities to work with and help a wide variety of patients. Analysts who accept both the limitations as well as the wide application and broad benefits of the psychoanalytic approach may have a more fulfilling experience than their training experiences might foster. At the same time, the analyst's level of therapeutic skill, the patient's diagnosis, and many multiple external factors create different limitations in the practice and outcome of psychoanalytic work. Extensive case material is used to show the broad range of patients who are helped by the psychoanalytic method. The clinical material also shows the less than perfect, but often good enough outcomes of these difficult cases with often severely disturbed patients.
authors.affiliation: Adjunct Faculty of the Institute for Psychoanalytic Studies, USA. drwaska@aol.com
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Waska
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy; D008875:Middle Aged; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*