Measures of cardiac repolarization and body position in infants.
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is the most common cause of death in children between 1 and 6 months of age. Recent data suggest that a prolonged QTc interval on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with SIDS. Prone body position during sleep is also known to be a risk factor for SIDS; this has prompted the American Academy of Pediatrics to promote the "Back to Sleep" campaign. We postulated that the QTc interval in infants might change as a function of body position, linking the observations relating body position and QTc interval to SIDS. We recorded ECGs in a group of infants in both the supine and prone position to determine if the QTc interval and QT dispersion differ between the 2 positions. Forty-seven standard 12-lead EGGs and high-amplitude, rapid-sweep 12-lead EGGs were performed on 45 healthy infants (mean age 26 +/- 40 days) in both the supine and prone positions. The infants were asleep in a quiet, restful state. The ECGs were reviewed by 2 investigators blinded to the position of the infants during recording. Measurements included the average QTc interval (using Bazett's correction) and QT dispersion (the difference between the longest and the shortest QT intervals on a standard 12-lead EKG). The study was designed to detect a 3% difference in QTc interval with 80% power and alpha = 0.05. All subjects had telephone or clinical follow-up at 1 year. The average QTc interval was 403 +/- 20 milliseconds (msec) in the supine position and 405 +/- 27 msec in the prone position (p = NS). The QT dispersion was 20 +/- 12 msec in the supine position and 22 +/- 13 msec in the prone position (p = NS). One infant in the study group died of SIDS at the age of 3 months. The EGG of this patient revealed a QTc interval of 382 msec in the supine position and 407 msec in the prone position; the QT dispersion was 34 msec in the supine position and 34 msec in the prone position. We found no difference in QTc interval or QT dispersion as a function of body position in healthy infants resting quietly. Prolongation of the QTc interval is unlikely to explain the increased risk for SIDS associated with prone body position in the general population of healthy infants, unless patients with long QT syndrome are somehow more influenced by body position than normal patients are.
Baker
Sherri S
SS
Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Milazzo
Angelo S
AS
Valente
Anne Marie
AM
Paul
Ian M
IM
Talner
Norman S
NS
Sanders
Stephen R
SR
Kanter
Ronald J
RJ
Li
Jennifer S
JS
D004562:Electrocardiography; D005260:Female; D006329:Heart Conduction System / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008133:Long QT Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis; D008297:Male; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000379:methods; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D016684:Prone Position; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012494:Sampling Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013398:Sudden Infant Death / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016683:Supine Position; D015996:Survival Rate; D020257:Ventricular Remodeling / Q000502:physiology*