Effect of method of application of a fibrolytic enzyme product on digestive processes and milk production in Holstein-Friesian cows.
Four multiparous cows with cannulas in the rumen and proximal duodenum were used in early lactation in a 4 x 4 Latin square experiment to investigate the effect of method of application of a fibrolytic enzyme product on digestive processes and milk production. The cows were given ad libitum a total mixed ration (TMR) composed of 57% (dry matter basis) forage (3:1 corn silage:grass silage) and 43% concentrates. The TMR contained (g/kg dry matter): 274 neutral detergent fiber, 295 starch, 180 crude protein. Treatments were TMR alone or TMR with the enzyme product added (2 kg/1000 kg TMR dry matter) either sprayed on the TMR 1 h before the morning feed (TMR-E), sprayed only on the concentrate the day before feeding (Concs-E), or infused into the rumen for 14 h/d (Rumen-E). There was no significant effect on either feed intake or milk yield but both were highest on TMR-E. Rumen digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and starch was unaffected by the enzyme. Digestibility of NDF was lowest on TMR-E in the rumen but highest postruminally. Total tract digestibility was highest on TMR-E for dry matter, organic matter, and starch but treatment differences were nonsignificant for neutral detergent fiber. Corn silage stover retention time in the rumen was reduced by all enzyme treatments but postruminal transit time was increased so the decline in total tract retention time with enzymes was not significant. It is suggested that the tendency for enzymes to reduce particle retention time in the rumen may, by reducing the time available for fibrolysis to occur, at least partly explain the variability in the reported responses to enzyme treatment.
Sutton
J D
JD
Centre for Dairy Research, Department of Agriculture, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AR, UK. j.d.sutton@reading.ac.uk
Phipps
R H
RH
Beever
D E
DE
Humphries
D J
DJ
Hartnell
G F
GF
Vicini
J L
JL
Hard
D L
DL
D019342:Acetic Acid / Q000032:analysis; D000818:Animals; D020148:Butyric Acid / Q000032:analysis; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D002480:Cellulase / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004032:Diet; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004063:Digestion / Q000187:drug effects*; D004435:Eating; D005260:Female; D005285:Fermentation; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007700:Kinetics; D007774:Lactation / Q000187:drug effects*; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000008:administration & dosage; D010421:Pentanoic Acids / Q000032:analysis; D011422:Propionates / Q000032:analysis; D012417:Rumen / Q000378:metabolism; D012820:Silage; D013213:Starch / Q000008:administration & dosage; D043325:Xylan Endo-1,3-beta-Xylosidase; D014995:Xylosidases / Q000008:administration & dosage*
D004043:Dietary Fiber; D010421:Pentanoic Acids; D011422:Propionates; D020148:Butyric Acid; D013213:Starch; D014995:Xylosidases; D043325:Xylan Endo-1,3-beta-Xylosidase; D002480:Cellulase; C038780:n-pentanoic acid; C029658:propionic acid; D009584:Nitrogen; D019342:Acetic Acid