title: Response of effluent-irrigated Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus radiata to salinity and vapor pressure deficits.
abstract: Effects of high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and soil salinity on growth and physiology of Pinus radiata D. Don and Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex Maiden were studied in a five-year-old plantation irrigated with salt-enhanced effluent (2.2 dS m(-1)) or freshwater (0.2 dS m(-1)) for 14 weeks during spring and summer. Salt was then rapidly leached by over-irrigation with low-salinity effluent. Soil water and salinity, tree water stress, sap flux, substrate carbon conversion efficiency, foliage and stem growth, and foliar cations and chloride were monitored throughout the study. An average of 9 and 1 Mg ha(-1) of salt with an average hydraulic load of 660 and 780 mm was applied to the salt and control plots, respectively. Maximum soil salinity in the root zone was 5.8 and 6.8 dS m(-1) in the eucalypt and pine plots, respectively. Predawn water potential was more than twice as sensitive to increasing salinity in E. grandis as in P. radiata. The salt treatment reduced rates of leaf and stem growth of the eucalypts by 60 to 70% but had no effect on leaf and stem growth of the pines. In the eucalypts, salinity decreased mean leaf area by 26% and increased specific leaf area by 12% compared with control values, indicating less biomass per unit leaf area in the salt treatment. Salinity had no effects on these two parameters in pine. The salt treatment significantly increased mean foliar concentrations of Na and Cl in both species, and of K in the pines. Foliar Na concentration was 6-10 times higher in the eucalypts than in the pines. Lowered water potential and increased Na concentration in the eucalypts in response to salinity resulted in about a 50% reduction in the efficiency of conversion of carbon into biomass; however, three weeks after leaching the salt, there was no significant difference in efficiency of conversion of carbon into biomass between the treatments. Salinity had no effect on water use by eucalypts, but caused a nonsignificant decrease (7%) in water use by pines. As evaporative demand increased, crop factor (transpiration divided by pan evaporation) declined by up to 50 and 60% in the pines and eucalypts, respectively. We conclude that stomatal response to high VPD, not soil salinity, accounts for most of the reduction in summertime water use.
authors.affiliation: CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, P.O. Box E4008, Kingston, ACT 2604, Australia.
authors.forename: B. J.
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Myers
authors.forename: R. G.
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Benyon
authors.forename: S.
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Theiveyanathan
authors.forename: R. S.
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Criddle
authors.forename: C. J.
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: R. A.
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Falkiner