title: Are lichens active under snow in continental Antarctica?
abstract: Photosynthetic activity, detected as chlorophyll a fluorescence, was measured for lichens under undisturbed snow in continental Antarctica using fibre optics. The fibre optics had been buried by winter snowfall after being put in place the previous year under snow-free conditions. The fibre optics were fixed in place using specially designed holding devices so that the fibre ends were in close proximity to selected lichens. Several temperature and PPFD (photosynthetic photon flux density) sensors were also installed in or close to the lichens. By attaching a chlorophyll a fluorometer to the previously placed fibre optics it proved possible to measure in vivo potential photosynthetic activity of continental Antarctic lichens under undisturbed snow. The snow cover proved to be a very good insulator for the mosses and lichens but, in contrast to the situation reported for the maritime Antarctic, it retained the severe cold of the winter and prevented early warming. Therefore, the lichens and mosses under snow were kept inactive at subzero temperatures for a prolonged time, even though the external ambient air temperatures would have allowed metabolic activity. The results suggest that the major activity period of the lichens was at the time of final disappearance of the snow and lasted about 10-14 days. The activation of lichens under snow by high air humidity appeared to be very variable and species specific. Xanthoria mawsonii was activated at temperatures below -10 degrees C through absorption of water from high air humidity. Physcia dubia showed some activation at temperatures around -5 degrees C but only became fully activated at thallus temperatures of 0 degrees C through liquid water. Candelariella flava stayed inactive until thallus temperatures close to zero indicated that liquid water had become available. Although the snow cover represented the major water supply for the lichens, lichens only became active for a brief time at or close to the time the snow disappeared. The snow did not provide a protected environment, as reported for alpine habitats, but appeared to limit lichen activity. This provides at least one explanation for the observed negative effect of extended snow cover on lichen growth.
authors.affiliation: Botanisches Institut, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Olshausenstrasse 40, 24098 Kiel, Germany. Spannewitz@bot.uni-kiel.de
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pannewitz
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schlensog
authors.forename: T G Allan
authors.initials: TG
authors.lastname: Green
authors.forename: Leopoldo G
authors.initials: LG
authors.lastname: Sancho
authors.forename: Burkhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Schroeter
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000864:Antarctic Regions; D002734:Chlorophyll / Q000032:analysis; D000077194:Chlorophyll A; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D005336:Fiber Optic Technology; D005453:Fluorescence; D006813:Humidity; D008011:Lichens / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology*; D010788:Photosynthesis; D012914:Snow
chemical_list: D002734:Chlorophyll; D000077194:Chlorophyll A