Design-effects in prospective and retrospective memory for actions.
There is ample evidence that memory for action phrases such as "open the bottle" is better in subject-performed tasks (SPTs), i.e., if the participants perform the actions, than in verbal tasks (VTs), if they only read the phrases or listen to them. It is less clear whether also the sole intention to perform the actions later, i.e., a prospective memory task (PT), improves memory compared with VTs. Inconsistent findings have been reported for within-subjects and between-subjects designs. The present study attempts to clarify the situation. In three experiments, better recall for SPTs than for PTs and for PTs than for VTs were observed if mixed lists were used. If pure lists were used, there was a PT effect but no SPT over PT advantage. The findings were discussed from the perspective of item-specific and relational information.
Jahn
Petra
P
Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. p.jahn@mx.uni-saarland.de
Engelkamp
Johannes
J
D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013998:Time Perception