title: Effects of enamel matrix derivative on mineralized tissue formation during bone wound healing in rat parietal bone defects.
abstract: Enamel matrix derivative (EMD: Emdogain) has been reported to stimulate the biosynthesis and regeneration of trabecular bone. To address whether the biological action of EMD is dependent on the local environment of osseous tissue, circular perforations were made in parietal bones and immediately filled with either EMD or its carrier, propylene glycol alginate (PGA), as control. On post-operative days 4-60, the dissected bones were examined by various histological techniques. New bone matrix, which was immunoreactive for bone sialoprotein (BSP), was formed from the periosteum at the peripheral area of perforations. Different from the findings reported in injured long bones, mineralized tissue was produced in the regenerating connective tissue within bone defects. This mineralized tissue was hardly immunostained for BSP, contained few collagen fibres, and lacked osteocytic lacunae and layers of osteoblasts and osteoid. Energy-dispersive X-ray analysis showed that Ca and P weight % and Ca/P molar ratio of this mineralized tissue were similar to or slightly higher than those in the pre-existing parietal bones. In addition, most multinucleated cells located in mineralized tissue lacked a ruffled border structure and showed weak immunoreaction for the lysosomal cysteine proteinase, cathepsin K, whereas those located in the bone matrix exhibited ruffled borders and strong cathepsin K expression. However, multinucleated cells located in both tissues were strongly stained for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. The volume fraction of such mineralized tissue appeared to be higher in EMD-applied bones than in PGA-applied controls. The mineralized tissue-forming stromal cells within bone defects appeared to show greater accumulation in EMD-applied bones than in PGA-applied controls. Our results suggest that the bioactive effects of EMD on bone wound healing and mineralized tissue formation depend, at least in part, on the local osseous environment where EMD has been applied.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oral Histology, School of Dentistry, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan.
authors.forename: Yoshiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sawae
authors.forename: Takako
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sahara
authors.forename: Fumi
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Kawana
authors.forename: Takahisa
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sasaki
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001846:Bone Development / Q000502:physiology*; D001861:Bone Regeneration; D002113:Calcification, Physiologic / Q000187:drug effects; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000737:chemistry*; D003746:Dental Enamel Proteins / Q000494:pharmacology*; D008854:Microscopy, Electron; D010006:Osteoblasts / Q000737:chemistry / Q000648:ultrastructure; D010294:Parietal Bone / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000503:physiopathology; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D014945:Wound Healing / Q000187:drug effects*
chemical_list: D003746:Dental Enamel Proteins; C109069:enamel matrix proteins