title: [CT and MR image fusion using two different methods after prostate brachytherapy: impact on post-implant dosimetric assessment].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study different methods of CT and MR images fusion in patient treated by brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. To compare the results of the dosimetric study realized on CT slices and images fusion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fourteen cases of patients treated by I125 were retrospectively studied. The CT examinations were realized with contiguous section of 5mm thickness, and MR images were obtained with a surface coil with contiguous section of 3 mm thickness. For the images fusion process, only the T2 weighted MR sequence was used. Two processes of images fusion were realized for each patient, using as reference marks the bones of the pelvis and the implanted seeds. A quantitative and qualitative appreciation was made by the operators, for each patient and both methods of images fusion. The dosimetric study obtained by a dedicated software was realized on CT images and all types of images fusion. The usual dosimetric indexes (D90, V100 and V150) were compared for each type of image.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The quantitative results given by the software of images fusion showed a superior accuracy to the one obtained by the pelvic bony reference marks. Conversely, qualitative and quantitative results obtained by the operators showed a better accuracy of the images fusion based on iodine seeds. For two patients out of three presenting a D90 inferior to 145 Gy on CT examination, the D90 was superior to this norm when the dosimetry was based on images fusion, whatever the method used.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The images fusion method based on implanted seed matching seems to be more precise than the one using bony reference marks. The dosimetric study realized on images fusion could allow to rectify possible errors, mainly due to difficulties in surrounding prostate contour delimitation on CT images.
authors.affiliation: Département d'imagerie médicale, institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris, France. vincent.servois@curie.net <vincent.servois@curie.net>
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Servois
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chauveinc
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: El Khoury
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lantoine
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ollivier
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Flam
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Rosenwald
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Cosset
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Neuenschwander
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D001918:Brachytherapy; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed