title: Effects of pre-synchronization using combinations PGF(2alpha) and (or) GnRH on pregnancy rates of Ovsynch- and Cosynch-treated lactating Holstein cows.
abstract: In Experiment 1, the effects of two pre-synchronization treatments on synchronized AI pregnancy rates of lactating dairy cattle were compared. Lactating Holstein cows (n=159) received 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -7 and 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day 0 and were observed once daily for signs of estrus from day -3 to day 3. Cows detected in standing estrus and those that had lost significant amounts of tail-chalk in the previous 24h were immediately inseminated in a once-daily observation/AI program. Cows not detected in estrus by 72 h after PGF(2alpha) received fixed-time AI (TAI) and a concurrent 100 microg injection of GnRH (im). Cows were randomly assigned by parity and calving date to receive one of the following pre-synchronization treatments: (1) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -35 and day -21 (PGF-PGF) or (2) 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -14 (GnRH). Fewer (P<0.05) GnRH- (49%, 41/84) than PGF-PGF-pretreated cows (65%, 49/75) were detected in estrus, however, overall pregnancy rates were not affected by pre-synchronization treatment (30 versus 32%, respectively). In Experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows received 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -7, 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day 0 and TAI at 60-64 h after PGF(2alpha). Cows were randomized by parity and postpartum interval into pre- and post-synchronization treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pre-synchronization treatments included: (1) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -35 and on day -21 (PGF-PGF; n=168) or (2) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -21 and 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -14 (PGF-GnRH; n=180). Within each pre-synchronization treatment, cows were further allocated by parity and postpartum interval to receive as a post-synchronization treatment 100 microg of GnRH (im) at either 48 h (Ovsynch; n=175) or 60-64 h (Cosynch; n=173) after PGF(2alpha). Pregnancy rates at TAI were not affected by pre- (PGF-PGF=26%, 44/168 versus PGF-GnRH=24%, 44/180) or post-synchronization treatments (Ovsynch=29%, 50/175 versus Cosynch=22%, 38/173). However, the numeric shift towards reduced pregnancy rates in Cosynch-treated cows suggests the 12h interval between GnRH and AI may be important to optimize conception rates in GnRH-PGF(2alpha)-based TAI protocols in dairy cattle. In conclusion, each of the pre-synchronization protocols evaluated in present study performed with comparable efficacy. Although the Cosynch protocol facilitates more efficient labor utilization, numeric trends toward reduced conception warrants further investigation.
authors.affiliation: Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH 43064, USA. jmdejarnette@selectsires.com
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: DeJarnette
authors.forename: C E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Marshall
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D015237:Dinoprost / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004971:Estrus; D004973:Estrus Synchronization / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary; D007774:Lactation; D010298:Parity; D049590:Postpartum Period; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D012621:Seasons; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D007987:Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; D015237:Dinoprost