title: Choices about abortion method: assessing the quality of patient information leaflets in England and Wales.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the quality of patient leaflets regarding the choice between medical and surgical abortions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross sectional survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  NHS and private providers of abortion services in England and Wales.
  
  
  METHODS
  Leaflets from three private providers, all teaching hospitals (n = 14) and a representative sample of NHS district hospitals (n = 27), accessed by approximately 100,000 women per year.
  
  
  METHODS
  On telephoning the above abortion services, the leaflets provided to women choosing to have medical or surgical abortions were requested. Content analysis of leaflets included: application of a coding frame assessing adequacy of information about options, risks and procedures; the Flesch Readability Ease scale.
  
  
  METHODS
  Provision of leaflet, adequacy of information and ease of readability.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seventy-three percent (44/60) of contacted providers offered women a leaflet. Of these 44 leaflets, one mentioned medical and 15 surgical abortion methods only. Adequacy of information provision was low, with on average 10/23 points covered about the surgical method, 12/21 points about the medical method and 7/11 points about aftercare. Readability scores were poor with 24/44 (55%) rated as 'difficult' or 'fairly difficult'. Among NHS providers, scores were slightly higher in the teaching than in the district hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  On average, leaflets provided half the information possible about the risks and procedures of medical and surgical methods. In addition, readability was rated as difficult in over half the leaflets. It seems unlikely that these leaflets enable women to make informed choices between abortion methods and, therefore, do not meet the requirements of current guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Fertility Control Unit, St James's University Teaching Hospital, Leeds, UK.
authors.forename: Sandra S M
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: Hilary L
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Bekker
authors.forename: Jim G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Thornton
authors.forename: Babatunde A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Gbolade
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D008427:Maternal Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D010174:Pamphlets; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011247:Pregnancy; D011261:Pregnancy Trimester, First; D017149:Private Sector; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012307:Risk Factors; D013222:State Medicine; D014852:Wales