title: Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
abstract: People experience regulatory fit (E. T. Higgins, 2000) when the strategic manner of their goal pursuit suits their regulatory orientation, and this regulatory fit feels right. Fit violation feels wrong. Four studies tested the proposal that experiences of fit can transfer to moral evaluations. The authors examined transfer of feeling wrong from fit violation by having participants in a promotion or prevention focus recall transgressions of commission or omission (Studies 1 and 2). Both studies found that when the type of transgression was a fit violation, participants expressed more guilt. Studies 3 and 4 examined transfer of feeling right from regulatory fit. Participants evaluated conflict resolutions (Study 3) and public policies (Study 4) as more right when the means pursued had fit.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA. camacho@psych.columbia.edu
authors.forename: Christopher J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Camacho
authors.forename: E Tory
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Higgins
authors.forename: Lindsay
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Luger
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D009519:New York City; D011640:Public Policy; D012927:Social Control, Informal; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012945:Social Values