title: 'Better than numbers...' A gentle critique of evidence-based medicine.
abstract: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) has achieved cult status in the last 10 years or so. It is an altogether admirable movement in medicine, capable of a great deal of good. Its privileged status, however, has prevented critics from being heard, and there are problems with EBM. Eight features need further discussion if EBM is not to be discredited and superseded. They are its reductionism; its unwitting paternalism; its privileging of restricted kinds of evidence; its dependence on the questionable concept of equipoise; the instability of the 'truths' it produces; its capacity to eliminate individuals in favour of categories; its historical arrogance; and its contempt for the wisdom and integrity of our predecessors. Evidence-based medicine is here to stay; for the moment, at least. It is sufficiently well established to withstand critique. It needs criticism if it is to survive and flourish.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. milesl@ozemail.com.au
authors.forename: Miles
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Little
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results