Genetic enhancement in the twenty-first century: three problems in legal imagining.
By what method should we resolve the ethical and public policy issues surrounding genetic enhancement: a utilitarian calculus, appeal to Scripture, application of neo-Kantian principles? In this Article, the author claims that, despite the diversity of our basic methodological commitments, we can advance our shared understanding of the issues surrounding genetic enhancement and come to agree upon certain central features as essential to any adequate method for resolving those issues. The author attempts to make modest headway on both fronts by engaging in "legal imagining." Legal imagining consists of examining hypothetical problems from the lawyer's perspective, the perspective of a caring, professional friend. This Article examines and discusses three problems in legal imagining.
Berry
R M
RM
School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA.
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D024861:Genetic Enhancement / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D015316:Genetic Therapy; D006801:Humans; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010290:Parents; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013177:Sports