Motivational subtypes and continuous measures of readiness for change: concurrent and predictive validity.
This study compared the concurrent and predictive validity of motivational subtypes versus a continuous measure of readiness for change as measured by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale (URICA; E. A. McConnaughy, J. O. Prochaska, & W. F. Velicer, 1983) in 252 individuals participating in a substance abuse treatment study (38% female; mean age = 36). Hierachical cluster analysis identified a 2-cluster solution. Consistent with previous research, both the motivational subtypes and the continuous readiness measure exhibited good concurrent validity with both baseline characteristics and change process variables. Neither readiness-for-change measure predicted end treatment outcomes. Measures of readiness for change based on the URICA exhibit limited clinical utility, because they are not able to predict future behavior.
Blanchard
Kimberly A
KA
Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, USA. kblancha@casacolumbia.org
Morgenstern
Jon
J
Morgan
Thomas J
TJ
Labouvie
Erich
E
Bux
Donald A
DA
D000328:Adult; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007406:Interview, Psychological; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009042:Motivation; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009515:New Jersey; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D016896:Treatment Outcome