title: Whose DAM account? Attentional learning explains Booth and Waxman.
abstract: Booth and Waxman (Cognition 84 (2002) B11) have recently shown that linguistic cues to animacy affect children's novel name extensions. They argue that this demonstration contradicts two central tenets of our attentional learning account of object naming, which Booth and Waxman characterize as the "dumb attentional mechanism" or "DAM" account. In the present article, we show that the first of these tenets has never been a feature of the attentional learning account, and that the second tenet, which is central to our account, is not addressed by Booth and Waxman's findings. We suggest that the debate about the nature of children's language and cognition would profit from an increased awareness of the different levels of analysis at which different researchers are working.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. smith4@indiana.edu
authors.forename: Linda B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: Susan S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Hanako
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yoshida
authors.forename: Eliana
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Colunga
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D002663:Child Language; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003210:Concept Formation; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007804:Language Development; D007858:Learning; D011582:Psychological Theory