title: Death with dignity or life with health care rationing.
abstract: The observations made of Oregon's Death with Dignity Act are reassuring to the extent that they accurately state that patients who seek relief under the Act view it as a mechanism to further their autonomy. But, given the nature of social data gathering, including the potential for response bias and self-validation, and the degree to which the concept of "autonomy" is open to a broad or narrow interpretation, one has to be careful not to accept this finding at face value. It is also reassuring to read that contrary to what some people have supposed, the presence of an option to hasten death has not had a chilling effect on the prescription of pain medication. At the same time, however, the authors believe that it is important to ensure that these expressions of autonomy-based reasoning are indeed valid and authentic.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Religion, 361 Holmes Hall, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5000, USA.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Illingworth
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Bursztajn
mesh_terms: D003068:Coercion; D003657:Decision Making; D003866:Depressive Disorder; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008329:Managed Care Programs; D016743:Mental Competency; D009042:Motivation; D009922:Oregon; D010166:Palliative Care; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology; D012297:Right to Die; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D019452:Terminally Ill / Q000523:psychology*; D035862:Vulnerable Populations