title: Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.
abstract: The construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance was assessed by using 2 data sets, each based on a different 360 degrees rating instrument. Specifically, the authors investigated the nature of the constructs measured by developmental ratings, the structural relationships among those constructs, and the generalizability of results across 4 rater perspectives (boss, peer, subordinate, and self). A structure with 4 lower order factors (Technical Skills, Administrative Skills, Human Skills, and Citizenship Behaviors) and 2 higher order factors (Task Performance and Contextual Performance) was tested against competing models. Results consistently supported the lower order constructs, but the higher order structure was problematic, indicating that the structure of ratings is not yet well understood. Multisample analyses indicated few practically significant differences in factor structures across perspectives.
authors.affiliation: College of Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695-7229, USA. steve_scullen@ncsu.edu
authors.forename: Steven E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Scullen
authors.forename: Michael K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Mount
authors.forename: Timothy A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Judge
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D010559:Personnel Management; D011361:Professional Competence; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis