title: Comparison between endorectal coil and pelvic phased-array coil magnetic resonance imaging in patients with anorectal tumor.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used as one of the diagnostic tools in the preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. However, the usefulness of endorectal coil (ERC) compared with phased array coil (PA) MRI is still unknown.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nineteen patients with rectal (17 patients) and anal (2 patients) tumors undergoing both ERC-MRI and PA-MRI preoperatively were included in the study. Seventeen patients had advanced stage tumors, and the remaining 2 had early stage tumors. The diagnostic accuracy of depth tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis were compared with reference to the histopathologic findings as the gold standard.
  
  
  RESULTS
  ERC-MRI was evaluable in only 10 (52.6%) of 19 patients, because of difficulties in ERC placement, whereas PA-MRI could be obtained in all patients (100%). In 10 patients examined by both modalities, the diagnostic accuracy of depth of tumor invasion was 80% by ERC-MRI and 80% by PA-MRI. In lymph node staging, ERC yielded sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 62.5%, and overall accuracy of 70.0%. The corresponding values for PA-MRI were 50%, 100% and 90.0%, respectively. These figures were not significantly different between the two modalities.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ERC-MRI and PA-MRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy. ERC-MRI may be abandoned in the preoperative staging of patients with locally advanced anorectal tumors because of its limited clinical utility.
authors.affiliation: First Department of Surgery, Kyorin University, School of Medicine, 6-20-2 Shinkawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan. Hiroelvis@aol.com
authors.forename: Hiroyoshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Matsuoka
authors.forename: Akihisa
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Nakamura
authors.forename: Tadahiko
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Masaki
authors.forename: Masanori
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sugiyama
authors.forename: Taro
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Takahara
authors.forename: Junichi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hachiya
authors.forename: Yutaka
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Atomi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001005:Anus Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D002277:Carcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008545:Melanoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D009361:Neoplasm Invasiveness; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology