General physiology, experimental psychology, and evolutionism. Unicellular organisms as objects of psychophysiological research, 1877-1918.
This essay aims to shed new light on the relations between physiology and psychology in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by focusing on the use of unicellular organisms as research objects during that period. Within the frameworks of evolutionism and monism advocated by Ernst Haeckel, protozoa were perceived as objects situated at the borders between organism and cell and individual and society. Scholars such as Max Verworn, Alfred Binet, and Herbert Spencer Jennings were provoked by these organisms to undertake experimental investigations situated between general physiology and psychology that differed from the physiological psychology advocated by Wilhelm Wundt. Some of these investigations sought to locate psychological properties in the molecular structure of protoplasm; others stressed the existence of organic and psychological individuality in protozoa. In the following decades, leading philosophers such as Friedrich Nietzsche, Charles Sanders Peirce, and Henri Bergson, as well as psychological researchers like Sigmund Freud, integrated the results of these investigations into their reflections on such problems as the nature of the will, the structure of the ego, and the holistic nature of the reactions of organisms to their environment.
Schloegel
Judy Johns
JJ
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Wilhelmstrasse 44, D-10117 Berlin, Germany.
Schmidgen
Henning
H
D000818:Animals; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000266:history; D005075:Biological Evolution; D056890:Eukaryota / Q000502:physiology*; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D007206:Individuality; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000502:physiology; D011589:Psychology, Experimental / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods; D011603:Psychophysiology / Q000266:history* / Q000379:methods