title: Have health conditions associated with latex increased since the issuance of universal precautions?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study explored whether the prevalence of latex-related health conditions has increased among individuals employed in medical occupations relative to those employed in nonmedical occupations since the issuance of universal precautions in 1987.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data derived from the 1983 to 1994 versions of the National Health Interview Survey were used to obtain odds ratios comparing prevalence rates of latex-related symptoms over time.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No statistical evidence was found that the universal precautions resulted in increased prevalence rates of latex-related health conditions among medical workers relative to those employed in nonmedical occupations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Increased use of latex gloves among health care personnel subsequent to the implementation of universal precautions appears to have had no effect on latex allergic reactions experienced by these workers.
authors.affiliation: Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
authors.forename: Brian P
authors.initials: BP
authors.lastname: McCall
authors.forename: Irwin B
authors.initials: IB
authors.lastname: Horwitz
authors.forename: John D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Kammeyer-Mueller
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002487:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; D009783:Dermatitis, Occupational / Q000453:epidemiology*; D005260:Female; D017575:Gloves, Protective / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D020315:Latex Hypersensitivity / Q000453:epidemiology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009790:Occupations / Q000145:classification* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D015995:Prevalence; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D016635:Universal Precautions / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*