title: Randomized comparison trial of the RIK and the Nimbus 3 mattresses.
abstract: A randomized comparison trial was carried out at Queen's Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, to compare patient outcomes on the RIK mattress (KCI) and the Nimbus 3 mattress (Huntleigh Healthcare). One hundred and fifty-eight patients, who were assessed to be at particular risk of development of pressure ulcers using the Waterlow score (85 on RIK mattress, 83 on Nimbus), completed the trial. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline parameters at recruitment or pressure ulcer progress. Lack of difference can be as useful as evidence of superiority. Other factors such as nursing interventions required accessible equipment, and costs are important when making equipment choices. For a significant proportion of patients, a static (RIK) mattress can be as effective as an active (Nimbus 3) mattress for management of pressure ulcers.
authors.affiliation: Queen's Hospital, Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Russell
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Reynolds
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Towns
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Worth
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Greenman
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Turner
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001513:Beds; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000517:prevention & control*