title: [The third sentence of the Supreme Tribunal on "wrongful birth" cases. My attempt to reconcile its doctrine with that of the 2 previous sentences].
abstract: The High Court has pronounced three sentences about cases called "wrongful birth". In the first sentence the High Court estimated the mother's legal action. In the second sentence it rejected the legal action of the parents, with regard to some specific arguments. In the third sentence the High Court has also rejected the legal action of the parents but in relation to another different arguments. This article tries to find a reason for these apparent "jurisprudencial contradiction".
authors.affiliation: Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, España.
authors.forename: Ricardo
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: De Angel Yágüez
mesh_terms: D000015:Abnormalities, Multiple / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000196:embryology; D000649:Amniocentesis; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D004314:Down Syndrome; D005260:Female; D005315:Fetal Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D006330:Heart Defects, Congenital; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008099:Liver / Q000002:abnormalities; D008297:Male; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D009774:Obstetrics; D010290:Parents; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis; D013030:Spain; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal; D015974:Wrongful Life
vernacular_title: La tercera sentencia del Tribunal Supremo sobre casos de "wrongful birth". Mi intento de conciliar su doctrina con la de las dos sentencias anteriores.