title: The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques.
abstract: The progress in the surgery of male neurological cancers relies on the anatomico-surgical approach to the pelvic neural structures. The objective of our study was to provide a better understanding of the inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP) and its anatomical relationships in order to spare it during radical prostatectomy. Fifteen male formalin-preserved cadavers which had no sub-umbilical scar were used. In five subjects, the superior hypogastric plexus (SHP) and the pre-sacral plexus were displayed then the IHP and its sacral afferents (pelvic splanchnic nerves or erector nerves of Eckhardt) were dissected out. Serial sections of the IHP were then studied in ten subjects. This allowed its identification on certain imaging sections obtained in pelvic tumor pathology and these made up the "reference cuts". The IHP lies within a fibro-fatty plate which is flat, rectangular, sub-peritoneal, sagittal and symmetrical. It arises at the level of the intersection between the vas deferens and the terminal pelvic ureter and follows the postero-lateral aspect and circumvolutions of the seminal vesicle, with which there is a plane of surgical cleavage. The seminal vesicle is, therefore, an essential landmark for this neural structure. The plane of this cleavage may be used in pelvic cancer surgery. The safest technical means of respecting sexual function and the integrity of the IHP is to keep it at a distance. The preservation of a lateral layer of the seminal vesicle is probably a method of limiting these complications as long as this does not conflict with the oncological clearance. An irregular communicating branch was found in one of five cases between the IHP, the sacral plexus and the pudendal nerve. This communicating branch lay immediately behind the intersection between the vas deferens and the ureter in the sacral concavity. It overhangs the IHP in the seminal vesicle. Impotence remains a frequent complication after radical prostatectomy. The methods of neural preservation at the prostatic apex are known but neural preservation should also be carried out posteriorly at the lateral pole of the seminal vesicle. The possibility of posterior neural preservation may be assessed pre-operatively by study of the "reference sections". The cleavage plane between the seminal vesicle and the IHP may be used intra-operatively to spare the IHP. The cavernous nerve in particular emerges at the antero-inferior border of the IHP before running along the postero-lateral aspect of the prostate. It therefore passes in contact with the seminal vesicle and may as a result be injured during radical prostatectomy with vesiculectomy. A proximal communicating branch between the IHP and the pudendal nerve is irregular. Such communicating branches may explain a better recovery of sexual function in curative neurological cancer surgery. The essential relationship of the IHP is with the seminal vesicle. The two are in tight contact and the seminal vesicle has a true plane of surgical cleavage with IHP. The risk of injuries to the posterior erectile mechanisms can be reduced either by using the cleavage plane between the IHP and seminal vesicle or by leaving a layer of the seminal vesicle when the oncological conditions allow. During celio-surgery, the operator must be careful to retract the little bands of the seminal vesicle and divide the fibrous and vascular tracts which tighten during this maneuver. During an abdominal approach, dissection of the seminal vesicle takes place at the bottom of a real pit. The operator must carry out the division leaving a layer of the seminal vesicle in place rather than trying to extract all the seminal vesicle by placing the forceps blindly. This maneuver is naturally dependent on the oncological situation. The anatomical confirmation of a regular or irregular proximal or distal communicating branch between the IHP and the pudendal nerve is probably an explanation for the sometimes uncertain results of new techniques of neural preservation in curative cancer surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Roubaix Hospital, 11-17, Boulevard Lacordaire, BP 359, 59056, Roubaix Cedex, France. brigitte.mauroy@wanadoo.fr
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Mauroy
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Demondion
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Drizenko
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Goullet
authors.forename: J-L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Bonnal
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Biserte
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Abbou
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D004210:Dissection; D006801:Humans; D007001:Hypogastric Plexus / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011467:Prostate / Q000294:innervation* / Q000601:surgery; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D013153:Splanchnic Nerves / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000601:surgery