title: [The prohibition of lithotomy within the Hippocratic Oath: historical and ethical considerations on the history of surgery].
abstract: A passage with one of the most contradictory interpretations of the so-called Hippocratic Oath, which was presumably created between 500 and 300 before Christ, is the prohibition of lithotomy. The oldest handwritten traditions of the Hippocratic Oath are dating back to the 11th-12th century. However the section of the prohibition of lithotomy is missing in the oldest preserved tradition (Codex Urbinas gr. 64), which led to some authors interpretation of being added later on. Beyond all doubt the analysis of the texture of the Hippocratic Oath leads to the conclusion that the prohibition of bladder stone lithotomy must have been an integrative part of the oath from the very first beginning. The author could have been inspired by the following reasons to have a non oath related doctor let done the medical operation: the removal of a bladder stone by an operation, which was outfitted with many complications, was one of the most difficult surgical interventions in the antique. Celsus (1st century A. D.) mentioned "severe fever, urine fistula and deadly inflammations" after lithotomy. Since the operation was done perineally, presumably a negative sexual potency was feared. No doctor engaged to help and not to harm his patients was allowed to make this kind of operation, which was often followed by many complications. Nevertheless sometimes patients were "tantalised to death by suffering dreadful pain" through those bladder stone diseases. Consequently "practising men" (the term "surgeon" was created at a later date), those who had been specialised in that operation and had not been linked to the oath, were allowed to make this kind of dangerous operation. Due to a greater experience of those specialists (named as "Lithotomos" by Celsus ih the 1st century A. D.) the danger of this kind of operation was reduced. The prohibition of lithotomy could be interpreted as a commitment to realize the limits of ones own medical actions.
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Allgemein- und Gefässchirurgie, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sachs
mesh_terms: D003559:Cystostomy / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history*; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000266:history; D000076145:Greece, Ancient; D006625:Hippocratic Oath; D006666:History of Medicine; D049690:History, Ancient; D006801:Humans; D012384:Rome; D013038:Specialization; D018746:Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome / Q000266:history; D001744:Urinary Bladder Calculi / Q000266:history* / Q000601:surgery; D014548:Urinary Fistula / Q000266:history* / Q000601:surgery
vernacular_title: Das Steinschnittverbot im hippokratischen Eid: medizinhistorische und ethische Betrachtungen zur Geschichte der Chirurgie.