title: Item and associative recognition with precuing and postcuing.
abstract: M. Duncan & B. B. Murdock (2000) compared precued and postcued item recognition and serial recall showing precued-postcued differences for item recognition but not for serial recall. Precuing and postcuing refer to 2 conditions in which the instructions as to the type of recall test following the presentation of short lists of items is given before or after the list presentation. This methodology was extended here to a paired-associate task. In 2 experiments, short lists of paired associates were presented followed by single-item, old-new, or intact-rearranged pair recognition tests; test type was precued or postcued. A fast or slow presentation rate was used to discourage or encourage mediators. TODAM2 (a theory of distributed associative memory) predicts that there should be little or no cuing differences regardless of whether subjects use mediators to remember the pairs. As predicted the recognition data were essentially identical for the precued and postcued conditions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. murdock@psych.utoronto.ca
authors.forename: Bennet
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Murdock
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Duncan
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time; D012691:Serial Learning