Sociopolitical activist or conversational partner? Distinguishing the position of the therapist in narrative and collaborative therapies.
In this article, we explore the similarities and differences of two contemporary family therapy approaches: narrative and collaborative therapies. These therapies are contrasted by describing positioning of the narrative practitioner as sociopolitical activist and the collaborative practitioner as conversational partner. The article begins with a brief overview of the two therapies. Subsequently, we outline their epistemological genealogies and the practice similarities that arise from the theoretical assumptions underpinning these therapies. The remainder of the article addresses the theoretical and therapeutic differences in narrative and collaborative approaches reflected in the positioning of therapist as either sociopolitical activist or conversational partner. While narrative and collaborative approaches share more similarities than differences in relation to their emphasis on the constitutive characteristics of language, focus on sociorelational contexts, and critique of singular objective truths, prominence is given to the starker contrasts in narrative and collaborative understandings of politics, power, dialogue, and discourse. It is proposed that by outlining some provocative contrasts between narrative and collaborative approaches, new conversations and generative practices will emerge in the therapy room.
Monk
Gerald
G
Department of Counseling and School Psychology, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanille Drive, San Diego, California 92182-1179, USA. gmonk@mail.sdsu.edu
Gehart
Diane R
DR
D005196:Family Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D012380:Role