Legal rules and industry norms: the impact of laws restricting health insurers' use of genetic information.
Since 1991, twenty-eight states have enacted laws that prohibit insurers' use of genetic information in pricing, issuing, or structuring health insurance. This article evaluates whether these laws reduce the extent of genetic discrimination by health insurers. Using multiple data sources, it concludes that there are almost no well-documented cases of health insurers asking for or using pre-symptomatic genetic test results in their underwriting decisions either before or after these laws, or in states with or without these laws. At present, health insurers are not thinking about or interested in using genetic information of this sort. Using this information is not cost effective and is not seen as contributing significantly to underwriting accuracy. However, if genetic testing information were easily available, some health insurers would consider using it in some fashion if that were legal. In the future, such information could become much more relevant to health insurers than it is now. Therefore, the major effect of these laws is to make it less likely that insurers will use genetic information in the future. Although insurers and agents are only vaguely aware of these laws, the laws have helped to convince the industry that it is not appropriate or socially legitimate to use this information. Thus, these laws have caused the insurance industry to embrace more socially oriented norms and attitudes.
Wake Forest University, USA.
M A
MA
Hall
D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005817:Genetic Counseling / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D030661:Genetic Privacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D013219:State Government; D014481:United States