Measuring orientation to population-based prevention.
BACKGROUND
Assessing orientation to population-based preventive alternatives is useful in the evaluation of preventive medicine curricula.


METHODS
An instrument was developed using hypothetical situations describing a health issue that could be encountered by a primary care physician. Options to be selected were in three categories: (1) treatment, (2) clinical prevention, or (3) population-based prevention. Respondents allocated 900 points among alternatives for nine situations (100 points per situation). Pilot testing of the instrument was implemented, comparing the responses of public health physicians with two groups (Syracuse and Baltimore) of family medicine physicians.


RESULTS
For the overall instrument, the scores on the population scale and population-treatment differential showed statistically significant differences between the public health physicians and both groups of family medicine physicians (p<0.01). For medical students taught the Case-Based Series in Population-Oriented Prevention (C-POP), there was an overall increase in the population scale (p<0.0001) and the population-treatment differential (p<0.0004).


CONCLUSIONS
The development of a scenario-based tool to assess changes in population-based prevention orientation shows preliminary promise for future evaluation efforts involving preventive medicine curricula.
SUNY-Upstate Medical University, Preventive Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA. PMP@upstate.edu
Lloyd F
LF
Novick
Donald A
DA
Cibula
Sally M
SM
Sutphen
Sallie
S
Rixey
John W
JW
Epling
Cynthia B
CB
Morrow
D002983:Clinical Competence; D003479:Curriculum; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000193:education*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D018794:Problem-Based Learning; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D011634:Public Health / Q000193:education*; D014481:United States