On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges.
Practical aspects of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) replacing manual wedges are presented and discussed extensively. A comparison between measured and calculated data is also presented. Relative dose distributions and wedge factors were calculated with a commercially available treatment planning system and measured in a water-phantom and with an ionization chamber. Wedge factor calculations and measurements were also compared with an independent method of wedge factor calculations available from the literature. Aspects of the clinical implementation, such as safety and quality assurance, were evaluated. Measurements and calculations agreed very well and were slightly better than results of previous studies. Profiles and percentage depth doses (PDDs) agreed within 1% to 1.5% and within 0.5%, respectively. Measured and calculated wedge factors ratios agreed within 0.5% to 1%. Calculated and measured EDW dose distributions showed excellent agreement, both relative and absolute. However, for safe and practical use, specific aspects need to be taken into consideration. Once the treatment planning system is commissioned properly, the clinical implementation of EDW is rather straightforward.
Koken
Phil W
PW
Department of Radiation Oncology/Department of Clinical Physics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. PhW.Koken@vumc.nl
Heukelom
Stan
S
Cuijpers
Johan P
JP
D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011786:Quality Control; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011874:Radiometry; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted; D015203:Reproducibility of Results