Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders.
Deficits in pragmatic language ability are common to a number of clinical populations, for example, right-hemisphere damage (RHD), Autism and traumatic brain injury (TBI). In these individuals the basic structural components of language may be intact, but the ability to use language to engage socially is impaired. Despite the nature of these difficulties being well documented, exactly what causes these difficulties is less clear. Furthermore, the current status of causal explanations for pragmatic difficulties across these populations is divergent and sometimes contradictory. This paper explores the empirical validity of three theories that attempt to explain pragmatic language impairment. It is recommended that a new, more convergent approach to investigating the causes of pragmatic language disability be adopted.
Martin
Ingerith
I
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia.
McDonald
Skye
S
D001321:Autistic Disorder / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000503:physiopathology; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D007806:Language Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000503:physiopathology; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011340:Problem Solving; D012720:Severity of Illness Index