Parpalaix v. CECOS: Protecting Intent in Reproductive Technology.
Katz
G A
GA
Harvard Law School, USA.
D015925:Cryopreservation; D004243:Divorce; D019924:Embryo Disposition / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005260:Female; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D007316:Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous; D007317:Insemination, Artificial, Homologous; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D010067:Ownership / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010287:Parent-Child Relations / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D037022:Posthumous Conception / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012737:Sex Factors; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States