Suicide intervention and non-ideal Kantian theory.
Philosophical discussions of the morality of suicide have tended to focus on its justifiability from an agent's point of view rather than on the justifiability of attempts by others to intervene so as to preserve it. This paper addresses questions of suicide intervention within a broadly Kantian perspective. In such a perspective, a chief task is to determine the motives underlying most suicidal behaviour. Kant wrongly characterizes this motive as one of self-love or the pursuit of happiness. Psychiatric and scientifc evidence suggests that suicide is instead motivated by nihilistic disenchantment with the possibility of happiness which, at its apex, results in the loss of the individual's conception of her practical identity. Because of this, methods of intervention that appeal to agents' happiness, while morally benign, will prove ineffective in forestalling suicide. At the same time, more aggressive methods violate the Kantian concern for autonomy. This apparent dilemma can be resolved by seeing suicide intervention as an action undertaken in non-ideal circumstances, where otherwise unjustified manipulation, coercion, or paternalism are morally permitted.
Department of Philosophy, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA. mcholbi@brooklyn.cuny.edu
Michael J
MJ
Cholbi
D003068:Coercion; D006801:Humans; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D026706:Paternalism / Q000941:ethics*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010684:Philosophy; D012649:Self Concept; D012934:Social Isolation; D013405:Suicide / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology*; D000092864:Suicide Prevention