title: Lymph node metastases in the lower neck.
abstract: Current knowledge suggests that lymph node metastases in the lower neck (supraclavicular fossa and posterior triangle) are associated with a poor survival. Very little systematic work has been published on this subject. This was a retrospective study carried out on a database where all patients were entered in a prospective manner over a 35-year period using a standard pro-forma. Data on 168 patients presenting with a lower neck node metastasis were retrieved. The main outcome measures were: association between variables and tumour-specific survival. Data were displayed in contingency tables and analysed by chi-square and categorical modelling. Recurrence and survival were plotted in a cause-specific manner using the Kaplan Meir method. Differences in curves were analysed using the log rank test. Multivariate analysis was carried out using Cox's proportional hazard model. The only association was between site and node level and histology. Head and neck tumours were associated with squamous histology (P = 0.0004) and supraclavicular nodes (P = 0.0047). Survival time was not significantly different when lower-neck lymph node metastasis from the head and neck was compared to non-head and neck metastasis: 5-year survival 30% and 10% respectively (P = 0.1363). Survival with posterior triangle metastases was significantly better than supraclavicular metastases (P = 0. 0059), confirmed on multivariate analysis. Laterality of metastasis had no effect on survival (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in survival between squamous and non-squamous metastases on Cox regression (P = not significant). There were 85 head and neck primaries including lymphomas, 53 infraclavicular primaries and 30 unknown primaries. There were 73 squamous cell carcinomas, 27 adenocarcinomas, 34 lymphomas, 28 undifferentiated tumours and six other tumours. Nearly half the primary tumours were below the clavicle. Survival was unaffected by laterality, primary site or histology, but was better for posterior triangle nodes.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Head and Neck Oncology Group, University of Liverpool, UK.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Giridharan
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hughes
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Fenton
authors.forename: A S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Jones
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000556:secondary; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000556:secondary; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D005260:Female; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology*; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008223:Lymphoma / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000473:pathology; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011379:Prognosis; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016019:Survival Analysis