The indications and outcomes in the use of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap.
BACKGROUND
Whether secondary to cancer surgery ablation or trauma, surgeons are faced with defects of the mandible or maxilla that would be best reconstructed with a thin, pliable soft tissue component and vascularized bone. A subset of these challenging wounds do not require the bicortical bone necessary to reestablish structural integrity or to retain a dental prosthesis, because the soft tissue needs are more critical than the bony needs. It is this niche that the radial forearm osteofaciocutaneous free flap (RFOFF) fulfills well. In the past, potential and real donor site morbidity has precluded the routine use of this flap. New methods to reduce this morbidity have rekindled our use of this flap. PROCEDURES USED: A retrospective review of patients with defects of the mandible or maxilla treated with the RFOFF from July 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was performed. After flap harvest, the donor site was rigidly fixated. A skin graft was placed, and a volar splint was applied for 7 days. The arm was then fully mobilized. Parameters examined were defect location, donor site complications, flap survival, fistula occurrence, plate fracture, and/or extrusion.


RESULTS
Thirty-four patients were reconstructed with the RFOFF with a follow-up of 10-54 months. Seven patients had an anterior maxillectomy defect, and 27 patients had a lateral mandibulectomy defect with associated tongue/tonsillar fossa and/or palate defect. There were no cases of flap failure or donor site radius fracture. During the follow-up period, there were no plate fractures or intraoral exposures as evidenced by clinical and radiographic evaluation. Fistulas occurred in five patients; all healed without surgical intervention.


CONCLUSIONS
With rigid fixation of the residual radius, donor site morbidity has been minimized, and indications for this flap have expanded. Specifically the anterior maxillary arch and the ascending ramus, angle, and posterior body of the mandible (nontooth-bearing areas) are the sites most amenable to the thin bony stock of the harvested radius. The pliable forearm skin is ideal for the soft tissue defects. We believe that the RFOFF with bone has a definite role in the reconstruction of select head and neck defects.
Villaret
Douglas B
DB
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room M2-228, Gainesville, Florida 32608, USA. villadb@ent.ufl.edu
Futran
Neal A
NA
D000368:Aged; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D017577:Cutaneous Fistula / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D005542:Forearm; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008339:Mandibular Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D008441:Maxillary Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D008446:Maxillofacial Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D016896:Treatment Outcome