"Don't just do something, stand there!": to teach or not to teach, that is the question--intravenous fluid resuscitation training for Combat Lifesavers.
Good Level I scientific evidence supporting the efficacy (decreased morbidity and mortality) of prehospital fluid administration by civilian Emergency Medical Services personnel is lacking. The efficacy of this procedure in the hands of army Combat Lifesavers is even less well substantiated. The purpose of this article is to look critically at the skill of intravenous fluid administration that is taught to army Combat Lifesavers and to consider whether or not the application of that skill is actually beneficial to the majority of patients who are recipients of this procedure. A method is described to assist medical educators in making decisions as to which skills should be taught to health care providers, and this method is loosely applied in the following discussion about whether Combat Lifesavers should receive training to start and administer intravenous fluids. Good scientific studies, based on valid data, need to be performed to determine the efficacy of intravenous fluid administration and other combat medical skills.
Cloonan
Clifford C
CC
Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.
D002983:Clinical Competence; D005440:Fluid Therapy; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000193:education*; D012151:Resuscitation / Q000193:education*; D014857:Warfare; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000628:therapy*