Conformational dynamics and temperature dependence of photoinduced electron transfer within self-assembled coproporphyrin:cytochrome c complexes.
The focus of the present study is to better understand the complex factors influencing intermolecular electron transfer (ET) in biological molecules using a model system involving free-base coproporphyrin (COP) complexed with horse heart cytochrome c (Cc). Coproporphyrin exhibits bathochromic shifts in both the Soret and visible absorption bands in the presence of Cc and an absorption difference titration reveals a 1:1 complex with an association constant of 2.63 +/- 0.05 x 10(5) M(-1). At 20 degrees C, analysis of time-resolved fluorescence data reveals two lifetime components consisting of a discrete lifetime at 15.0 ns (free COP) and a Gaussian distribution of lifetimes centered at 2.8 ns (representing (1)COP --> Cc ET). Temperature-dependent, time-resolved fluorescence data demonstrate a shift in singlet lifetime as well as changes in the distribution width (associated with the complex). By fitting these data to semiclassical Marcus theory, the reorganizational energy (lambda) of the singlet state electron transfer was calculated to be 0.89 eV, consistent with values for other porphyrin/Cc intermolecular ET reactions. Using nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy the temperature dependences of the forward and thermal back ET originating from triplet state were examined ((3)COP --> Cc ET). Fits of the temperature dependence of the rate constants to semiclassical Marcus theory gave lambda of 0.39 eV and 0.11 eV for the forward and back triplet ET, respectively (k(f) = (7.6 +/- 0.3) x 10(6) s(-1), k(b) = (2.4 +/- 0.3) x 10(5) s(-1)). The differing values of lambda for the forward and back triplet ET demonstrate that these ET reactions do not occur within a static complex. Comparing these results with previous studies of the uroporphyrin:Cc and tetrakis (4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin:Cc complexes suggests that side-chain flexibility gives rise to the conformational distributions in the (1)COP --> Cc ET whereas differences in overall porphyrin charge regulates gating of the back ET reaction (reduced Cc --> COP(+)).
Croney
John C
JC
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA.
Helms
Michael K
MK
Jameson
David M
DM
Larsen
Randy W
RW
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003306:Coproporphyrins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D045304:Cytochromes c / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects*; D004579:Electron Transport / Q000528:radiation effects*; D008027:Light; D046911:Macromolecular Substances; D009206:Myocardium / Q000737:chemistry / Q000201:enzymology; D011485:Protein Binding / Q000528:radiation effects; D011487:Protein Conformation / Q000528:radiation effects*; D013050:Spectrometry, Fluorescence / Q000379:methods; D055672:Static Electricity; D013696:Temperature
D003306:Coproporphyrins; D046911:Macromolecular Substances; D045304:Cytochromes c