The effect of trajectory on the auditory motion aftereffect.
The auditory motion aftereffect (aMAE) can be induced in listeners after repeated presentation of a horizontally moving sound source. Aftereffects have also been found for the individual acoustic consequences of source motion such as amplitude or frequency modulations (AM, FM). No study, however, has investigated whether combining these changes would enhance the magnitude of the aMAE, which has appeared otherwise weak relative to its visual counterpart. AM, FM and binaural changes can occur simultaneously when sources move along common translational trajectories rather than the restricted rotational paths used in previous adaptation studies. This raises the question whether the observed weakness of the aMAE is due to the improper stimulation of units responsive to the entire macrostructure induced by translational motion. The hypothesis is tested here that if integrated motion detectors exist, then including lawful amplitude and frequency changes in adapting stimuli may enhance aftereffects. Though results indicate that interaurally moving stimuli in general induce an aMAE, the acoustic macrostructure of translational motion does not appear to increase the aftereffect. A simple cross-correlation model is used to illustrate that such acoustic modulations may allow brainstem auditory centers time to recover from adaptation to translational motion.
Neelon
Michael F
MF
Department of Psychology, 1202 W. Johnson St., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA. mfneelon@students.wisc.edu
Jenison
Rick L
RL
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004423:Ear / Q000502:physiology; D005366:Figural Aftereffect; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D012399:Rotation