title: Privacy on thin ice? Considering the California Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. Superior Court.
abstract: In Johnson v. Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal determined that a provision of a contract limiting the discovery of the identity of a sperm donor was against public policy and that the privacy interest did not protect against disclosure of this information. Although the court's analysis of the public policy exception to the enforcement of contracts was unnecessary, the opinion properly balances California's and petitioners' interests against an anonymous donor's privacy right.
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Plosker
mesh_terms: D002140:California; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D032982:Contracts; D030881:Disclosure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007316:Insemination, Artificial, Heterologous / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016365:Liability, Legal; D008297:Male; D018907:Privacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011640:Public Policy; D013074:Sperm Banks / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*