title: Why liberals should accept financial incentives for organ procurement.
abstract: Free market libertarians have long supported incentives to increase organ procurement, but those oriented to justice traditionally have opposed them. This paper presents the reasons why those worried about justice should reconsider financial incentives and tolerate them as a lesser moral evil. After considering concerns about discrimination and coercion and setting them aside, it is suggested that the real moral concern should be manipulation of the neediest. The one offering the incentive (the government) has the resources to eliminate the basic needs that pressure the poor into a willingness to sell. It is unethically manipulative to withhold those resources and then offer payment for organs. Nevertheless, the poor have been left without basic necessities for 20 years since the passage of the prohibition on incentives. As long as the government continues to withhold a decent minimum of welfare, liberals should, with shame, cease opposing financial incentives for organ procurement.
authors.affiliation: Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Veatch
mesh_terms: D003068:Coercion; D005249:Fees and Charges / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D011203:Poverty; D011287:Prejudice; D011640:Public Policy; D012935:Social Justice; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000191:economics* / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States