title: Estimating the rock volume bias in paleobiodiversity studies.
abstract: To interpret changes in biodiversity through geological time, it is necessary first to correct for biases in sampling effort related to variations in the exposure of rocks and recovery of fossils with age. Data from New Zealand indicate that outcrop area is likely to be a reliable proxy of rock volume in both stable cratonic regions, where the paleobiodiversity record is strongly correlated with relative sea level, and on tectonically active margins. In contrast, another potential proxy, the number of rock formations, is a poor predictor of outcrop area or sampling effort in the New Zealand case.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Post Office Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand. j.crampton@gns.cri.nz
authors.forename: James S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Crampton
authors.forename: Alan G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Beu
authors.forename: Roger A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Cooper
authors.forename: Craig M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: Bruce
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Marshall
authors.forename: Phillip A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Maxwell
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D016208:Databases, Factual; D017753:Ecosystem; D005580:Fossils; D019015:Geologic Sediments; D008974:Mollusca; D009520:New Zealand; D010163:Paleontology; D015983:Selection Bias