Fatigue testing and performance of acrylic bone-cement materials: state-of-the-art review.
Over the past three decades or so, a very large volume of literature has been generated on the impact of an assortment of variables on the fatigue lifetimes of a large number of acrylic bone-cement formulations. In the present article, this literature is examined critically to reveal areas of agreement, areas of disagreement, as well as a welter of underexplored and unexplored topics. For example, there is unanimity of support for the notion that an increase in the molecular weight of the powder constituents or the fully cured cement leads to an increase in the cement's fatigue life, whereas there is disagreement as to whether vacuum mixing the cement constituents leads to an increase in the fatigue life of the fully cured cement (relative to the hand-mixed counterpart). Among the underexplored topics is systematic study of the effect of test frequency on the fatigue results, whereas determination of the optimal concentration of the antibiotic in an antibiotic-loaded cement is an example of the unexplored topics. It is pointed out that resolving the controversies, addressing the underexplored topics, and filling the lacunae will allow comprehensive evaluations of acrylic bone-cement materials to be made. This enhanced body of knowledge will prove invaluable in the continued use of acrylic bone cement as the anchoring agent in cemented arthroplasties.
Lewis
Gladius
G
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA. glewis@memphis.edu
D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001843:Bone Cements / Q000737:chemistry / Q000302:isolation & purification; D003287:Contrast Media; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008422:Materials Testing; D008970:Molecular Weight; D011208:Powders; D014783:Viscosity
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001843:Bone Cements; D003287:Contrast Media; D011208:Powders