Effect of design of pre-fabricated posts and post heads on the retention of various cements and core materials.
The retention of new Para Post (PP) rounded undercut post head (PP-XT) was compared with the conventional flattened head (PP-P), using amalgam Dentacore and Synergy composite as core materials. The retention of the posts PP (passive serrated), PP-P (passive serrated with venting channels), PP-XP (passive, raised diamond-style pattern) and PP-XT (threaded on the coronal portion, and passive, raised diamond-shaped pattern on the apical portion), cemented with zinc phosphate cement (ZPC) or Duo Cement to extracted teeth, was evaluated. Tensile strength plots were recorded using an Instron instrument, while pulling the post and core in opposite directions. The following conclusions were drawn from this study: (i) The round undercut PP-XT head was more retentive than the PP-P head with both core materials. (ii) Amalgam was more retentive than Synergy with both head designs. (iii) PP-XT was the most retentive post to extracted tooth canals and PP-XP was the least retentive with either ZPC or Duo Cement. Post retention with (iv) ZPC in decreasing order of magnitude: PP-XT > PP-P > PP > PP-XP; and with Duo Cement: PP-XT > PP > PP-P > PP-XP - ZPC exhibited the highest retention of cemented posts.
Hochman
N
N
Department of Prosthodontics, Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Founded by the Alpha Omega Fraternity, Jerusalem, Israel.
Feinzaig
I
I
Zalkind
M
M
D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D003738:Dental Cements; D003772:Dental Pins; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D011176:Post and Core Technique / Q000592:standards*; D013718:Tensile Strength; D015036:Zinc Phosphate Cement
D003738:Dental Cements; C072541:Duo Cement; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D015036:Zinc Phosphate Cement