Measurement in abstinence education. Critique and recommendations.
The purpose of this article is to identify, assess, and offer solutions to common measurement errors found in sexual abstinence education evaluation. A critical review of the methodology of adolescent sexuality research was performed. "Gold standards" of their measurement strategy were derived and applied against 14 selected studies. Many of the articles reviewed had substantial limitations in their measurement strategies. However, several articles demonstrated excellence and serve as models for future efforts. Sexual abstinence education evaluation is plagued by the inherent weaknesses of self-report and health outcome measures. However, with careful adherence to the gold standards proposed, it is possible to limit the threat from these weaknesses, maximizing the benefit of self-report surveys and county-level health indicators.
Smith
Thomas E
TE
School of Social Work, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2570, USA. tsmith@mailer.fsu.edu
Steen
Julie A
JA
Spaulding-Givens
Jennifer
J
Schwendinger
Andrea
A
D000293:Adolescent; D006801:Humans; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000592:standards*; D012107:Research Design; D012650:Self Disclosure; D012736:Sex Education / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012746:Sexual Abstinence; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D014481:United States