New directions in the study of semantic deficits: a comment on Storms et al. (2003).
G. Storms, T. Dirikx, J. Saerens, S. Verstaeten, and P. P. De Deyn (2003) have provided an important critique of the use of multidimensional scaling (MDS) to evaluate semantic knowledge in Alzheimer's disease. If MDS is to be used with semantic proximity data (in spite of well-documented reasons for not doing so), at minimum, the issues raised in G. Storms et al. should be considered. A few criticisms of the target article are presented. Then, the manner in which key points from the article, along with a consideration of such factors affecting proximity elicitation as semantic domains, tasks, and the experimental context, could be applied to correct certain shortcomings in the literature are discussed.
Ober
Beth A
BA
Human Development, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. baober@ucdavis.edu
Shenaut
Gregory K
GK
D000544:Alzheimer Disease / Q000523:psychology*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D012660:Semantics