Considerations for conducting research in agricultural biotechnology.
Science has shown its increased vulnerability because of two recent high-profile articles published in major journals on corn produced through biotechnology: a laboratory report suggesting profound consequences to monarch butterfly populations due to Bt corn pollen and a report suggesting transgenic introgression into Mexican maize. While both studies have been widely regarded as having flawed methodology, publishing these studies has created great consternation in the scientific community, regulatory agencies and the general public. There are roles and responsibilities of scientists, scientific journals, the public media, public agencies, and those who oppose or advocate a specific technology, and serious consequences when those roles and responsibilities go awry. Modern communication may exacerbate the flow of misinformation and easily lead to a decline in public confidence about biotechnology and science. However, common sense tells us that scientific inquiry and the publication and reporting of results should be performed with high standards of ethical behavior, regardless of one's personal perspective on agricultural biotechnology.
Shelton
Anthony M
AM
Department of Entomology, Cornell University/NYSAES, 416 Barton Laboratory, Geneva, NY 14456, USA. ams5@cornell.edu
D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D000818:Animals; D001413:Bacillus thuringiensis; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D002080:Butterflies; D032984:Ethics, Research; D030841:Food, Genetically Modified / Q000009:adverse effects; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D010572:Pest Control, Biological / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified / Q000009:adverse effects; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards; D012107:Research Design