Myths as barriers to health care reform in the United States.
The U.S. health care system is deteriorating in terms of decreasing access, increased costs, unacceptable quality, and poor system performance compared with health care systems in many other industrialized Western countries. Reform efforts to establish universal insurance coverage have been defeated on five occasions over the last century, largely through successful opposition by pro-market stakeholders in the status quo. Reform attempts have repeatedly been thwarted by myths perpetuated by stakeholders without regard for the public interest. Six myths are identified here and defused by evidence: (1) "Everyone gets care anyhow;" (2) "We don't ration care in the United States"; (3) "The free market can resolve our problems in health care"; (4) "The U.S. health care system is basically healthy, so incremental change will address its problems;" (5) "The United States has the best health care system in the world"; and (6) "National health insurance is so unfeasible for political reasons that it should not be given serious consideration as a policy alternative." Incremental changes of the existing health care system have failed to resolve its underlying problems. Pressure is building again for system reform, which may become more feasible if a national debate can be focused on the public interest without distortion by myths and disinformation fueled by defending stakeholders.
Geyman
John P
JP
Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-4696, USA. jgeyman@u.washington.edu
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D018166:Health Care Reform; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D009229:Mythology; D011640:Public Policy; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States; D019472:Universal Health Insurance