title: Single motor unit analysis from spatially filtered surface electromyogram signals. Part I: spatial selectivity.
abstract: The aim of the study was to compare experimentally, on the basis of single motor unit (MU) activities, the selectivity of different spatial filters commonly used to detect surface electromyogram (EMG) signals. Surface EMG signals were recorded from the biceps brachii and the upper trapezius muscle of five subjects using a two-dimensional (2D) electrode array consisting of 16 pin electrodes. The subjects performed isometric contractions at different elbow angles and shoulder abduction and flexion. The same monopolar surface EMG signals were filtered using longitudinal single and double differential, transverse single and double differential and normal double differential filters. From the single MU action potentials, extracted by automatic EMG decomposition, indexes of transverse (perpendicular with respect to the fibre direction) and longitudinal (along the fibre direction) selectivity were computed. The number of detected MUs was 46 for the upper trapezius, with the arms held in the sagittal plane, and 52 when the arms were held in the frontal plane; 85 MUs were identified from the biceps brachii contractions. The results showed that transverse selectivity was significantly higher for the 2D and transverse one-dimensional (1D) filters with respect to the 1D longitudinal filters, whereas longitudinal selectivity was higher (i.e. MU action potentials were shorter) for the 2D filter and the longitudinal double differential filter. In particular, the relative attenuation of potential amplitude moving 5 mm from the source was, on average (for the two muscles), 16.5% for the least selective filter in the transverse direction (longitudinal single differential) and 35.7% for the most selective one in the same direction (transverse double differential). The MU action potential duration was, on average, 13.8 ms for the most selective filter in the longitudinal direction (longitudinal double differential) and 18.7 ms for the least selective one (transverse double differential). The normal double differential filter resulted in spatial selectivity indexes that ware not statistically different in the two directions from those of the best filters in each direction.
authors.affiliation: Centro di Bioingegneria, Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy. dario.farina@athena.polito.it
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Farina
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Schulte
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Merletti
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Rau
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Disselhorst-Klug
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D004576:Electromyography / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009046:Motor Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted