title: Physiotherapy treatment approaches for the recovery of postural control and lower limb function following stroke.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  There are a number of different approaches to physiotherapy treatment following stroke. Central to these are approaches based on 'neurophysiological' principles, 'motor learning' principles and 'orthopaedic' principles.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine if there is a difference in the recovery of postural control and lower limb function in patients with stroke if physiotherapy treatment is based on orthopaedic or neurophysiological or motor learning principles, or on a mixture of these treatment principles.
  
  
  METHODS
  This review drew on the search strategy developed by the Stroke Group as a whole. Relevant trials were identified in the Stroke Group Trials Register of Controlled Trials which was last searched in May 2001. We also searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library, Issue 4 1999), MEDLINE (1966-1999), EMBASE (1980-1999) and CINAHL (1982-1999) and contacted experts and researchers with an interest in stroke.
  
  
  METHODS
  Studies - randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials. Participants - adults with a clinical diagnosis of stroke. Interventions - physiotherapy treatment approaches aimed at promoting the recovery of postural control and lower limb function. Outcomes - measures of disability, motor impairment or participation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two independent reviewers categorised the identified trials according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, documented the methodological quality and extracted the data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eleven trials were included in the review, three of which were included in two comparisons. Four trials compared a neurophysiological approach with another approach; four trials compared a motor learning approach with another approach; four studies compared a mixed approach with another approach; two trials reported comparisons of sub-groups of the same approach. A large number of heterogeneous outcome measures were used, limiting the comparison of trial results. No one type of approach had a significantly better outcome than any other type of approach.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is insufficient evidence to conclude that any one physiotherapy treatment approach is more effective than another in promoting the recovery of postural control or lower limb function.
authors.affiliation: Stroke Therapy Evaluation Programme, Academic Department of Geriatric Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Level 3, Centre Block, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland, UK, G4 OSF. pollock@middleton4.freeserve.co.uk
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pollock
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Baer
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Pomeroy
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Langhorne
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001676:Biofeedback, Psychology / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000502:physiology; D009048:Motor Skills; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities / Q000379:methods*; D011187:Posture; D011434:Proprioception / Q000502:physiology; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation