title: Stealing thunder as a courtroom tactic revisited: processes and boundaries.
abstract: Stealing thunder refers to a dissuasion tactic in which an individual reveals potentially incriminating evidence first, for the purpose of reducing its negative impact on an evaluative audience. We examined whether it was necessary to frame the negative revelation in a manner that downplayed its importance, and found that stealing thunder successfully dissuaded mock jurors even without framing. We also sought to determine the mechanism by which stealing thunder operated, and found that stealing thunder led mock jurors to change the meaning of incriminating evidence to be less damaging to the individual. We also found that stealing thunder's effectiveness did not hinge on whether or not opposing counsel also mentioned the thunder evidence, and that the stealing thunder tactic was no longer effective when opposing counsel revealed to the mock jurors that the stealing thunder tactic had been used on them.
authors.affiliation: University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Lara
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Dolnik
authors.forename: Trevor I
authors.initials: TI
authors.lastname: Case
authors.forename: Kipling D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged