Social behaviors as determined by different arrangements of social consequences: diffusion of responsibility effects with competition.
According to a recently proposed synthesis, social loafing, social facilitation, and deindividuation can be viewed as different ways of arranging social consequences (B. Guerin, 1999). The effects of such arrangements have been measured in past research as productive output (social loafing and social facilitation) or as antinormative behaviors (deindividuation), but all 3 effects are manipulable by changing individual identifiability, evaluation, social identity, task difficulty, and presence in a group. The synthesis also predicted that these same variables would apply to other measures and other arrangements of social consequences. To this end, in the present 2 experiments, the author varied the arrangements for consequence diffusion in a competition situation by varying small and large competing groups and measured productive output and antinormative behaviors simultaneously. The 2 experiments showed social-consequence effects in competition situations with college students, giving further support for the social-consequence synthesis and the idea that the verbal naming of phenomena in social psychology is arbitrary.
Guerin
Bernard
B
Psychology Department, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. bguerin@waikato.ac.nz
D003163:Competitive Behavior; D006801:Humans; D012919:Social Behavior; D012932:Social Facilitation; D012933:Social Identification; D012941:Social Responsibility