title: Environmental risk communication for the clinician.
abstract: Although they are accustomed to discussing risks in the medical arena through the process of informed consent, primary care clinicians may have difficulty communicating with their patients and communities about environmental health risks. Clinicians are generally trusted and can play important roles as educators, alert practitioners, or even advocates talking about environmental health risks with individuals and groups. Communication of risk requires an understanding of how scientists and clinicians assess risk--the process of quantitative or qualitative risk assessment. Risk is never a purely scientific issue; risk is perceived differently depending on some well-understood characteristics of the hazard, the individual perceiving the risk, and the social context. Many low-income communities of color have faced and continue to face disproportionate environmental exposures and disease burdens. The issue of environmental justice can significantly affect the context of a discussion about a specific environmental risk. The essence of risk communication has been well described and requires careful evaluation of the science and the social context, honesty, listening to and partnering with the community, and a clear, compassionate team approach.
authors.affiliation: Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: Gina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Solomon
mesh_terms: D003142:Communication; D004782:Environmental Health; D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006282:Health Personnel; D018570:Risk Assessment