title: [Significance of axial rotation alignment of components of knee prostheses].
abstract: Increased internal malrotation of the tibial and femoral components affects kinematics of the patellofemoral joint and the flexion gap. A combined tibial and femoral malrotation may lead to maltracking of the patella. Isolated internal malrotation of the femoral component results in an asymmetric flexion gap. Clinically, the patients suffer from either lateral instability or medial stiffness in flexion. Lateral flexion instability leads to medial tibial pain,difficulties standing up from a chair,or instability during descending stairs or walking downhill. Medial stiffness in flexion may lead to secondary arthrofibrosis. There are three methods for determining femoral rotation by bony landmarks: (1) posterior condyles with 3 degrees of external rotation, (2) anterior-posterior axis according to Whiteside, and (3) transepicondylar axis. The transepicondylar axis approximates the flexion axis of the knee. All three bony landmarks have the disadvantage that they will not create a symmetric flexion gap in all cases. The balanced flexion gap technique seeks to achieve a perfectly balanced extension gap first, and then aligns the femoral component parallel to the tibial resection plane when the knee is under symmetric distraction in 90 degrees of flexion. The soft tissue releases for varus or valgus contraction have to be performed in extension first until the mechanical axis passes through the center of the knee, the center of the femoral head, and the center of the ankle. Using these methods, both,extension and flexion gap will become rectangular. The balanced flexion gap method has the disadvantage that the femoral component will not be aligned parallel to the epicondylar axis in some cases. It is not known which of the two methods will produce better clinical results. Rotational positioning of the tibial component referenced on the tibial tuberosity represents the most reliable method. Placing the tibial component according to the femoral component using the floating technique may increase an internal malrotation problem of the femur if present.
authors.affiliation: Kniechirurgie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Balgrist, Zürich, Switzerland. Jose.Romero@balgrist.ch
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Romero
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Stähelin
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wyss
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hofmann
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002102:Cadaver; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012399:Rotation; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed