title: Evaluation of postoperative fever: usefulness and cost-effectiveness of routine workup.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study was undertaken to determine which investigative tools are of most clinical benefit in a routine postoperative fever workup and to describe which postoperative patients require closer investigation at the time of fever.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a retrospective analysis of 676 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy for a gynecologic condition who had a fever of 38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) or higher. Charts were reviewed for independent variables related to their diagnosis and surgery in addition to any workup for fever. An estimate of the total charge of a routine workup was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS for Windows, version 10.1.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We found 194 patients (29%) had a postoperative temperature of 38.0 degrees C or higher. A laboratory/radiographic workup for the fever was performed in 119 women (61%). Only 15% of urinalyses, 14% of urine cultures, 7% of blood cultures, 14% of chest radiographs, and 17% of sputum cultures were positive. There were several significant differences between those with and without serious infections that can guide management of postoperative patients. The total charge for laboratory/radiographic workup was 48,432 US dollars or 2201 US dollars per serious infection diagnosed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Approximately 29% of women undergoing laparotomy by gynecologists have a fever of 38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) or higher. We found the majority of fever workups were of low clinical yield and added moderate cost. Significant infection is associated with surgery for malignancy, bowel resection, number of febrile days, higher fever, and moderately increased white blood cell count. Only patients with these characteristics are most likely to benefit from laboratory and/or radiographic workup of fever.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, 98195, USA.
authors.forename: Sarah H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: de la Torre
authors.forename: Lynn
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mandel
authors.forename: Barbara A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Goff
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016470:Bacteremia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D002140:California / Q000453:epidemiology; D002648:Child; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003955:Diagnostic Tests, Routine / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D005334:Fever / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology*; D005831:Genital Diseases, Female / Q000601:surgery*; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D007813:Laparotomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D008499:Medical Records; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies