Blending quantitative and qualitative methods in language research and intervention.
Best practice in speech-language pathology should be informed by current research findings. Traditional research methods are not always geared to address some of the complex, individual questions that arise in clinical intervention, however. Qualitative research methods may provide useful tools for bridging the gap from research to practice. Combinations of qualitative and quantitative procedures may be particularly helpful in sorting out some of the important issues surrounding language intervention in both clinical and research contexts. Examples of research blending qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as the case study of Sid, an 11-year-old boy with specific language impairment, are presented to illustrate how a combination of procedures can be used to enhance language research and intervention.
Brinton
Bonnie
B
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA. bonnie_brinton@byu.edu
Fujiki
Martin
M
D001007:Anxiety / Q000209:etiology; D002648:Child; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007802:Language; D007806:Language Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D036301:Qualitative Research; D013066:Speech-Language Pathology