The ethics of end-of-life decisions in the elderly: deliberations from the ECOPE study.
Is age a factor underlying clinical decision-making? Should age be a criterion in the allocation of health care resources? Is it correct to criticize this approach as 'ageism'? What role does 'paternalism' play? These questions are the focus of this chapter which takes an interdisciplinary perspective of clinical ethics in order to provide an ethical evaluation of the situation of the elderly in health care. First, the text of the chapter is based on the descriptive level referring to (a) clinical ethics consultation, (b) the ECOPE study on 'Ethical Conditions of Passive Euthanasia' focusing on decision-making, and studies about age as a factor in clinical decisions, such as the American SUPPORT study. Second, at the normative level, ethical deliberations are discussed for and against age as a criterion for allocating health care resources. Finally, it is suggested that the differences in evidence to be found about the role of age as a factor in clinical decision-making may be due to the different national health policies as well as to the insufficient awareness of ethical principles violated by covert 'ageist' attitudes.
Reiter-Theil
Stella
S
IAEME Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 2 IA, CH-4055 Basel, Switzerland. s.reiter-theil@unibas.ch
D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D003657:Decision Making; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005066:Euthanasia, Passive / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology; D005853:Geriatrics; D005858:Germany; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D040841:Resource Allocation / Q000941:ethics*