Medical decision support systems: old dilemmas and new paradigms?
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this paper is to examine past and present medical decision support systems and the environment in which they operate and to propose specific research tracks that improve integration and adoption of these systems in today's health care systems.


METHODS
In preamble, we examine the objectives, decision models, and performances of past decision support systems.


RESULTS
Medical decision support tools were essentially formulated from a technical capability perspective and this view has met limited adoption and slowed down new development as well as integration of these important systems into patient management work flows and clinical information systems. The science base of these systems needs to include evidence-based medicine and clinical practice guidelines and the paradigms need to be extended to include a collaborative provider model, the users and the organization perspectives. The availability of patient record and medical terminology standards is essential to the dissemination of decision support systems and so is their integration into the care process.


CONCLUSIONS
To build new decision support systems based on practice guidelines and taking into account users preferences, we do not so much advocate new technological solutions but rather suggest that technology is not enough to ensure successful adoption by the users, the integration into practice workflow, and consequently, the realisation of improved health care outcomes.
Fieschi
M
M
LERTIM, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, France. mfieschi@ap-hm.fr
Dufour
J-C
JC
Staccini
P
P
Gouvernet
J
J
Bouhaddou
O
O
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D018511:Systems Integration; D014481:United States