title: Testing fundamental evolutionary hypotheses.
abstract: Sober and Steel (J. Theor. Biol. 218, 395-408) give important limits on the use of current models with sequence data for studying ancient aspects of evolution; but they go too far in suggesting that several fundamental aspects of evolutionary theory cannot be tested in a normal scientific manner. To the contrary, we show examples of how some alternatives to the theory of descent can be formulated in such a way that they lead to predictions that can be evaluated (and rejected). The critical factor is a logical formulation of the alternatives, even though not all possible alternatives can be tested simultaneously. Similarly, some of the limits using DNA sequence data can be overcome by other types of sequence derived characters. The uniqueness (or not) of the origin of life, though still difficult, is similarly amenable to the testing of alternative hypotheses.
authors.affiliation: Allan Wilson Center for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. d.penny@massey.ac.nz
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Penny
authors.forename: Michael D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Hendy
authors.forename: Anthony M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Poole
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003198:Computer Simulation; D008957:Models, Genetic; D000069497:Origin of Life