title: Environmental degradation and remediation: is economics part of the problem?
abstract: It is argued that standard environmental economic and 'ecological economics', have the same fundamentals of valuation in terms of money, based on a demand curve derived from utility maximization. But this approach leads to three different measures of value. An invariant measure of value exists only if the consumer has 'homothetic preferences'. In order to obtain a numerical estimate of value, specific functional forms are necessary, but typically these estimates do not converge. This is due to the fact that the underlying economic model is not structurally stable. According to neoclassical economics, any environmental remediation can be justified only in terms of increases in consumer satisfaction, balancing marginal gains against marginal costs. It is not surprising that the optimal policy obtained from this approach suggests only small reductions in greenhouse gases. We show that a unidimensional metric of consumer's utility measured in dollar terms can only trivialize the problem of global climate change.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada. dore@adam.econ.brocku.ca
authors.forename: Mohammed H I
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Dore
authors.forename: Ian
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Burton
mesh_terms: D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D003256:Community Participation; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics*; D004463:Ecology; D004467:Economics; D004777:Environment; D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000517:prevention & control; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D006801:Humans; D011639:Public Opinion; D012945:Social Values
chemical_list: D002245:Carbon Dioxide