title: Scanning eye movements in homonymous hemianopia documented by scanning laser ophthalmoscope retinal perimetry.
abstract: Sparing or partial recovery of visual fields in hemianopic patients is frequently difficult to document. This is because when testing large field losses, the standard automated or manual visual field testing systems have limited fixation controls. Measured visual field recovery in these cases may not be real but instead may be due to an artifact such as scanning eye movement. This article illustrates a way to separate the actual visual field sparing from scanning eye movement artifact by using perimetry testing with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). During the SLO perimetry, the examiner has a direct and magnified view of the retinal fixation locus. This direct view allows for the added ability to monitor the fixation stability during target presentation. When eye movements larger than 1 degrees are noted, the examiner can repeat the trial. During static perimetry, our SLO records the retinal position of the fixation target at the end of the stimulus presentation and corrects scanning eye movements that occur during stimulus presentation. These special features enable us to identify when the apparent sparing of the visual field is due to the artifact of scanning. To demonstrate this, we selected the records of four hemianopic patients whose fields were examined by both standard perimetry and the SLO. We then compared the clinical visual fields with the SLO perimetry fields. One of the patients had a complete homonymous hemianopia on both the clinical perimetry and the SLO perimetry. A second patient was found by the SLO to have unstable fixation during testing. The SLO perimetry revealed that the apparent spared fields seen in standard perimetry were the result of eye scanning and not an actual enlargement of the visual field. Two other patients were confirmed by the SLO findings to have valid partial recovery of the visual field, one with and one without scanning eye movements. The advantages and limitations of SLO perimetry in analyzing hemianopic field sparing are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Specialty and Advanced Care, New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Jamara
authors.forename: Frans
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Van De Velde
authors.forename: Eli
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Peli
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016477:Artifacts; D005133:Eye Movements; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006423:Hemianopsia / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D007834:Lasers; D008875:Middle Aged; D019721:Ophthalmoscopes; D012160:Retina / Q000503:physiopathology*; D058609:Visual Field Tests; D014794:Visual Fields