The role of advisory organizations in ionizing radiation protection science and policy: a proposal.
Funding for radiation protection science and policy has been in decline for more than a decade. Agencies that set policies and standards for radiation protection depend on external expert groups for advice, and unless the funding situation is stabilized, the ability of these advisory organizations to provide timely advice will be compromised. This paper examines the history of radiation protection policy in the United States, reviews the funding patterns of international and national radiation protection advisory bodies, and suggests recommendations for assuring that radiological and radiation protection science remains an important part of the nation's public health policy agenda. Five major advisory organizations are the focus of this paper--ICRP, ICRU, NCRP, National Research Council BEIR Committees, and UNSCEAR. The recommendations developed in this paper address the following issues: (1) the need to coordinate activities among national and international advisory bodies in order to minimize overlap of work scope and ensure comprehensive coverage of major radiation protection issues; (2) the need to reevaluate activities and operations of advisory groups in the context of an ever-changing radiation protection landscape; and (3) the need to establish the NCRP as the major federal advisory organization for radiation protection in the United States and to stabilize funding through Congressional appropriations.
Mossman
Kenneth L
KL
School of Life Sciences, University Office of Radiation Safety, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-3501, USA.
D026683:Advisory Committees / Q000458:organization & administration*; D033161:Government Regulation; D007373:Interinstitutional Relations; D011640:Public Policy; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods*; D011839:Radiation, Ionizing; D012106:Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States