title: The relative strengths of indirect and direct word learning.
abstract: Indirect word learning lacks many of the overt social-pragmatic cues to reference available in direct word learning, yet the two result in equally robust mappings when comprehension is assessed immediately after learning. The 3 studies reported here investigated how 3-year-olds (N=96) respond to more challenging tests of the relative strengths of indirect and direct word learning. In Study 1, children's comprehension of indirectly and directly learned proper and common names was tested after a 2-day delay. Both types of learning resulted in proper name mappings that picked out an individual and in common name mappings that could be extended to another category member. In Studies 2 and 3, children's comprehension was tested after they had been provided with additional, and sometimes inconsistent, information about the scope of previously learned words. There was a hint of a difference between indirect and direct word learning. but results overall suggested that the two were equivalent.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA. vj8n@virginia.edu
authors.forename: Vikram K
authors.initials: VK
authors.lastname: Jaswal
authors.forename: Ellen M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Markman
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D014706:Verbal Learning; D014825:Vocabulary