title: Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to compare clinicians' ratings of the state of oral tissues and their satisfaction with treatment to edentulous patients' ratings of treatment success after provision of mandibular implant overdentures or conventional dentures.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sixty subjects randomly received either mandibular overdentures retained by two implants (n = 30) or new conventional mandibular complete dentures (n = 30). All were given new conventional maxillary dentures. Baseline measures included clinical evaluation of the oral soft and hard tissues. Patients rated their general satisfaction before and after treatment, as well as their satisfaction with stability, speech, and esthetics on visual analogue scales. The treating prosthodontist rated the dentures for the same categories. Patient and clinician ratings were compared using correlations, t tests, and linear regression.
  
  
  RESULTS
  None of the clinical variables were significantly correlated with patient satisfaction before or after treatment. The prosthodontist rated mandibular implant overdentures significantly better than conventional dentures regarding general satisfaction, stability, speech, and esthetics. Implant overdentures were also easier to fabricate (P < .0001). The prosthodontists' scores were not significantly correlated with patient scores for any question.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Clinicians' assessments of the quality of denture-supporting tissues are poor predictors of patient satisfaction with mandibular implant or conventional prostheses. Prosthodontists and patients both rate mandibular implant overdentures as significantly superior to conventional dentures, but patients and clinicians do not usually agree when evaluating individual prostheses.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
authors.forename: Guido
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Heydecke
authors.forename: Esa
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Klemetti
authors.forename: Manal A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Awad
authors.forename: James P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Lund
authors.forename: Jocelyne S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Feine
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous; D019094:Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / Q000523:psychology*; D003826:Denture, Complete, Lower / Q000523:psychology*; D003828:Denture, Overlay; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008334:Mandible; D009066:Mouth, Edentulous / Q000534:rehabilitation; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric