Are radiologists meeting the needs of Australian medical oncologists? Results of a national survey.
Although radiological evaluation plays an integral role in the management of oncology patients, little is known about which elements of such evaluation are most important or about how satisfied clinicians are with the quality of radiology services in cancer patients. We have developed a 36-item anonymous survey evaluating availability of and satisfaction with radiology services to medical oncologists. The survey was distributed to members of the Medical Oncology Group of Australia resident in Australia. We received 124 responses (51%). Most respondents (76.9%) were satisfied with their radiology services. Satisfaction correlated closely with the availability of standardized reporting and promptness of reporting (P < 0.001). Oncologists in private practise were more likely to receive prompt reports (P < 0.0001). Oncologists in public practice were more concerned about availability of CT scanning (P = 0.02). Services that were reported as less frequently available, despite being ranked as very important, included measurements of key lesions and comparison to previous studies. Standardized reporting was considered helpful by 91% of respondents. Only 32.5% of respondents reported receiving such a summary in more than 50% of cases and 21% never received such a summary. Our findings highlight the need for closer collaboration between oncologists and radiologists in order to address specific needs and develop optimal patterns of practise. Consideration should be given to standardization of reporting of radiology studies in oncology.
Koczwara
B
B
Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. bogda.koczwara@flinders.edu.au
Tie
M
M
Esterman
A
A
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001315:Australia; D003625:Data Collection; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008495:Medical Oncology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011871:Radiology