title: Quantifying the potential problem of overdiagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ in breast cancer screening.
abstract: The relevance of detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a breast cancer screening programme, and the extent of overdiagnosis of non-progressive lesions, remains controversial. It was the purpose of this paper to estimate the incidence of non-progressive, 'overdiagnosed' DCIS. We defined non-progressive DCIS (DCIS(0)) as DCIS which could not have progressed to invasive disease if left untreated. Progressive DCIS (DCIS(1)) was defined as DCIS which has the propensity to progress to invasive disease. We fitted a Markov process model of the incidence of progressive and non-progressive DCIS, the transition of the former to preclinical invasive disease and the subsequent progression to clinical symptomatic cancer. We used data from the Swedish Two-County Trial and from service screening programmes in the UK, Netherlands, Australia and the USA to estimate the incidence of progressive and non-progressive DCIS, and the detection rates of each at the first and subsequent screening. Average incidence of non-progressive DCIS was 1.11 per 100000 per year. Average incidence of progressive DCIS was 2.1 per 1000 per year. At prevalence screen, 37% of DCIS cases were estimated to be non-progressive. A woman attending prevalence screen has a 19 times greater chance of having a progressive DCIS or an invasive tumour diagnosed than of having a non-progressive DCIS diagnosed. At incidence screen, only 4% of DCIS cases were estimated to be non-progressive. A woman attending an incidence screen has a 166 times higher probability of having a progressive DCIS or invasive lesion diagnosed than of having a non-progressive DCIS diagnosed. There is an element of overdiagnosis of DCIS in breast cancer screening, but the phenomenon is small in both relative and absolute terms.
authors.affiliation: Cancer Research UK Department of Epidemiology, Mathematics and Statistics, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
authors.forename: M-F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Yen
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tabár
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Vitak
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: H-H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: S W
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Duffy
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D002278:Carcinoma in Situ / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D018270:Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D018450:Disease Progression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000592:standards*; D008875:Middle Aged; D008954:Models, Biological; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013548:Sweden / Q000453:epidemiology