title: Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.
abstract: Six pigeons performed a simultaneous matching-to-sample (MTS) task involving patterns of dots on a liquid-crystal display. Two samples and two comparisons differed in terms of the density of pixels visible through pecking keys mounted in front of the display. Selections of Comparison 1 after Sample 1, and of Comparison 2 after Sample 2, produced intermittent access to food, and errors always produced a time-out. The disparity between the samples and between the comparisons varied across sets of conditions. The ratio of food deliveries for the two correct responses varied over a wide range within each set of conditions, and one condition arranged extinction for correct responses following Sample 1. The quantitative models proposed by Davison and Tustin (1978), Alsop (1991), and Davison (1991) failed to predict performance in some extreme reinforcer-ratio conditions because comparison choice approached indifference (and strong position biases emerged) when the sample clearly signaled a low (or zero) rate of reinforcement. An alternative conceptualization of the reinforcement contingencies operating in MTS tasks is advanced and was supported by further analyses of the data. This model relates the differential responding between the comparisons following each sample to the differential reinforcement for correct responses following that sample.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand. bm.jones@auckland.ac.nz
authors.forename: B M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Jones
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D010856:Columbidae; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D016555:Matched-Pair Analysis; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological