Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both developed and developing countries, heavily impacts patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although recent research has found many positive and significant steps in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which HRQOL has been used as an outcome, questions remain regarding methodologic quality and impact value of HRQOL outcome assessments in some RCTs. To date, no detailed systematic review exists of HRQOL methodology in NSCLC RCTs.


METHODS
A systematic review using Cochrane methodology evaluated HRQOL components in RCTs. Identified studies were evaluated independently by three reviewers on a broad set of predetermined criteria.


RESULTS
Twenty-nine published RCTs (NSCLC patient samples total, N = 8445) with an HRQOL component were identified. Although most trials exhibited good-quality research and useful HRQOL and clinical data, the weaknesses identified in some trials include such common limitations as no clear hypothesis, lack of a clear approach to missing data and data analysis, and limited presentation of results.


CONCLUSIONS
Although it is clear that HRQOL is an important end point in NSCLC RCTs because the information helps to influence treatment recommendations, the identified weaknesses in conducting HRQOL measurement in NSCLC RCTs and the reporting of results need to be addressed.
Bottomley
Andrew
A
Quality of Life Unit, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center, Belgium, Germany. abo@eortc.be.
Efficace
Fabio
F
Thomas
Ronald
R
Vanvoorden
Veerle
V
Ahmedzai
Sam H
SH
D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D011788:Quality of Life; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design