title: Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:.
abstract: Biphasic versus Monophasic Cardioversion.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using monophasic transthoracic shocks occasionally is ineffective. Biphasic cardioversion requires less energy than monophasic cardioversion, but its efficacy in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation is unknown. Thus, we compared the efficacy of cardioversion using biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks in patients with atrial fibrillation previously refractory to monophasic cardioversion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-six patients with prior failed monophasic cardioversion were randomized to either a 360-J monophasic damped sinusoidal shock or biphasic truncated exponential shocks at 150 J, followed by 200 J and then 360 J, if necessary. If either waveform failed, patients were crossed over to the other waveform. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving sinus rhythm following initial randomized therapy. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression examined independent predictors of shock success, including patient age, sex, left atrial diameter, body mass index, drug therapy, and waveform. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the biphasic shocks and 28 to the monophasic shocks. Sinus rhythm was restored in 61% of patients with biphasic versus 18% with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). Seventy-eight percent success was achieved in patients who crossed over to the biphasic shock after failing monophasic cardioversion, whereas only 33% were successfully cardioverted with a monophasic shock after crossover from biphasic shock (P = 0.02). Overall, 69% of patients who received a biphasic shock at any point in the protocol were cardioverted successfully, compared to 21% with the monophasic shock (P < 0.0001). The type of shock was the strongest predictor of shock success (P = 0.0001) in multivariate logistic regression.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  An ascending sequence of 150-, 200-, and 360-J transthoracic biphasic cardioversion shocks are successful more often than a single 360-J monophasic shock. Thus, biphasic shocks should be the recommended configuration of choice for all cardioversions.
authors.affiliation: Terrence Donnelly Heart Center, Department of Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Yaariv
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Khaykin
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Newman
authors.forename: Marnie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kowalewski
authors.forename: Victoria
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Korley
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dorian
mesh_terms: D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000628:therapy*; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017211:Treatment Failure; D016896:Treatment Outcome