Using the family covenant in planning end-of-life care: obligations and promises of patients, families, and physicians.
Physicians and families need to interact more meaningfully to clarify the values and preferences at stake in advance care planning. The current use of advance directives fails to respect patient autonomy. This paper proposes using the family covenant as a preventive ethics process designed to improve end-of-life planning by incorporating other family members--as agreed to by the patient and those family members--into the medical care dialogue. The family covenant formulates advance directives in conversation with family members and with the assistance of a physician, thereby making advance directives more acceptable to the family, and more intelligible to other physicians. It adds the moral force of a promise to the obligation of respecting a patient's preferences about end-of-life care. These negotiations between patient, family, and physician, from early planning phases through implementation, should greatly reduce the incidence of family disagreements on what the patient would have wanted. The family covenant ensures advance directive discussions within the family, promotes and respects the autonomy of other family members, and might even spur others in the family to complete advance directives through additional covenants. The family covenant holds the potential to transform moral quagmires into meaningful moral conversation.
Doukas
David J
DJ
Family Practice and Community Medicine and Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Hardwig
John
J
D016223:Advance Directives; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000941:ethics*