title: [The practice of evidence-based medicine in surgery--evidence and experience].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The important role of technical expertise, experience and intuition in the operative specialties may hamper both clinical research and evidence-based medicine (EBM). We assessed whether the results of EBM practice projects actually varied between surgery and medicine.
  
  
  METHODS
  EBM practice projects were identified through a search in Medline. We examined the proportion of questions, for which evidence was found and which led to a change in clinical management. At the same time, the proportion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgical (95) and general internal medicine (84) journals was compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the 13 EBM practice projects identified, only two dealt with surgical patients. While the proportion of answerable questions was similarly high in all projects (61% to 96%), clinical impact was lower in surgical (9% and 18%) than in medical projects (20% to 48%). Compared to medical journals, surgical journals contained fewer RCTs (3.6% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.168).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The clinical impact of EBM seems to be lower in the operative specialties. This is probably due to the slightly poorer quality of surgical studies or to the difficulties of applying research results in one's own practice.
authors.affiliation: Biochemische und Experimentelle Abteilung, II. Chirurgischer Lehrstuhl, Universität zu Köln.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sauerland
authors.forename: Bertil
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bouillon
authors.forename: Edmund
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Neugebauer
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011643:Publishing; D013514:Surgical Procedures, Operative / Q000592:standards*