title: A comparison of 3 hand-held dynamometers used to measure hip abduction strength.
abstract: Quantification of strength with hand-held dynamometers is commonplace. Hand-held dynamometers offer ease of use; however, previous investigations have shown much variability between repeated measures using the same dynamometer. Even less is known regarding the degree of variability between various dynamometers. Therefore, the intent of this investigation was to compare measures of hip abduction strength recorded with 3 different but commonly used hand-held dynamometers, specifically the Microfet 2 Load Cell, Jamar Hand-Held, and Dial Push-Pull Gauge. Maximal isometric hip abduction strength was recorded in 10 women (27.6 +/- 6.2 years) over 3 consecutive days using a different device each day. A significant difference in recorded force was noted between the devices (p < 0.001) as the Microfet showed significantly less force than the others. This was supported by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging from 0.277 to 0.688. These data suggest that consideration must be given to using the same dynamometer when quantifying strength over repeated sessions.
authors.affiliation: Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Department of Physical Therapy, Shreveport, LA 71130, USA. pclick@lsuhsc.edu
authors.forename: Paula
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Click Fenter
authors.forename: James W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Bellew
authors.forename: Tonya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pitts
authors.forename: Rachael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kay
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005260:Female; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D015588:Observer Variation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016683:Supine Position / Q000502:physiology