title: A comparison of Lucitraps and sticky targets for sampling the blowfly Lucilia sericata.
abstract: The Lucitrap (Miazma Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia) combined with a synthetic odour bait, Lucilure (Miazma Pty Ltd, Queensland, Australia), is a commercially available trap for sampling and control of Lucilia cuprina (Wiedemann) in Australia. It was tested in Hungary against Lucilia sericata (Meigen) (Diptera: Calliphoridae), a cause of sheep strike throughout temperate Europe. The standard Lucitrap was tested against black or yellow sticky target traps. Both trap types were baited with either Lucilure or liver and 10% w/v sodium sulphide solution. With Lucilure as bait, L. sericata were caught on sticky traps but not in Lucitraps. With liver and sodium sulphide as bait, sticky traps caught 500-1500 times more L. sericata than Lucitraps. An adhesive sheet fitted to the top of a Lucitrap captured 30-300 times more L. sericata then were captured inside an unaltered Lucitrap. Direct observation of metallic green calliphorids (92.1% L. sericata) alighting on Lucitraps indicated that most flies stayed for a short while (modal class 2-4 s) and only a few stayed longer, to an observed maximum of 28 s. Flies explored a mean of 1.5 entry holes (range 0-7) during a visit but only 6% entered the trap. Size of L. sericata was not a physical barrier to Lucitrap entry, because many larger species were captured. However, L. sericata captured inside Lucitraps were significantly smaller than those captured on sticky traps, demonstrating that size was of behavioural importance. The data demonstrate that the Lucitrap is not effective as a trap for L. sericata in Hungary, due mainly to a failure of flies to enter the trap in large numbers. In Australia and South Africa, L. sericata is commonly caught in Lucitraps baited with Lucilure, although L. cuprina is more numerous. Our study highlights the potential for diversity of fly behaviour between different geographical populations of the same species. Such diversity can have a significant effect on the functioning of systems for fly sampling and control, when these systems depend for their success on certain behavioural responses of the target species.
authors.affiliation: Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, UK. M.Hall@nhm.ac.uk
authors.forename: M J R
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Hall
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Hutchinson
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Farkas
authors.forename: Z J O
authors.initials: ZJ
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: N P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Wyatt
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000469:parasitology; D004175:Diptera / Q000254:growth & development / Q000472:pathogenicity / Q000502:physiology*; D006814:Hungary; D007300:Insect Control / Q000379:methods*; D009812:Odorants; D012621:Seasons; D014921:Wings, Animal / Q000033:anatomy & histology