title: Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Misoprostol, a synthetic E1 methyl analog prostaglandin, is at present receiving attention as a cervical modifier and labor induction agent. However, there is still a need for better determination of its safety and effectiveness.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare intravaginal misoprostol versus intravenous oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in pregnant women with unripe cervices.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomized controlled trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was performed at the Leonor Mendes de Barros Maternity Hospital between November 1998 and December 2000.
  
  
  METHODS
  210 pregnant women with intact membranes and indication for labor induction were selected.
  
  
  METHODS
  The women randomly received 25  g of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours, not exceeding 8 doses (105 women), or oxytocin in a continuous infusion (105 women).
  
  
  METHODS
  The main parameters measured were: latent period, time from induction to vaginal delivery, delivery route, occurrence of vaginal delivery with time, occurrence of uterine tonus alterations, hypoxia and neonatal morbidity. To verify the statistical significance of the differences between the groups, the chi-squared, Student t and log-rank tests were used.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were no significant differences between the groups concerning conditions for labor induction, age, parity, race, marital status, family income, initial Bishop Index and number of prenatal visits. The cesarean section rate, latent period and period from induction to vaginal delivery were significantly lower for the misoprostol group. With regard to uterine tonus alterations, tachysystole was significantly more common in the misoprostol group. However, there was no difference in hypoxia and neonatal morbidity between the groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  25  g of misoprostol used vaginally every 4 hours is safer and more efficient for cervical ripening and labor induction than oxytocin.
authors.affiliation: Maternity Hospital Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo, Brazil. mmaa@visualbyte.com.br
authors.forename: Márcia Maria Auxiliadora
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: de Aquino
authors.forename: José Guilherme
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Cecatti
mesh_terms: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D000328:Adult; D020070:Cervical Ripening / Q000187:drug effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007751:Labor, Induced; D016595:Misoprostol / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D010121:Oxytocin / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011273:Pregnancy, Prolonged / Q000187:drug effects; D011930:Reaction Time; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000020:Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal; D016595:Misoprostol; D010121:Oxytocin