Beyond alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs.
On the basis of an empirical study of measures of constructs from the cognitive domain, the personality domain, and the domain of affective traits, the authors of this study examine the implications of transient measurement error for the measurement of frequently studied individual differences variables. The authors clarify relevant reliability concepts as they relate to transient error and present a procedure for estimating the coefficient of equivalence and stability (L. J. Cronbach, 1947), the only classical reliability coefficient that assesses all 3 major sources of measurement error (random response, transient, and specific factor errors). The authors conclude that transient error exists in all 3 trait domains and is especially large in the domain of affective traits. Their findings indicate that the nearly universal use of the coefficient of equivalence (Cronbach's alpha; L. J. Cronbach, 1951), which fails to assess transient error, leads to overestimates of reliability and undercorrections for biases due to measurement error.
Schmidt
Frank L
FL
Department of Management and Organizations, Henry B Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA. frank-schmidt@uiowa.edu
Le
Huy
H
Ilies
Remus
R
D015982:Bias; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008433:Mathematics; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D014894:Weights and Measures