title: Does your equipment maintenance management program measure up?
abstract: Identifying a clear maintenance philosophy is the first step toward choosing the right program for your healthcare organization. The second step is gaining a clear understanding of how proposed savings and improvements will be delivered. The third and last step is requiring that the proposed company or manager have specific tools in place for measuring and analyzing program performance. There are three primary philosophies underlying current equipment management options. These include risk-transfer philosophy (e.g., maintenance insurance, service contracts, multi-vendor and outsource programs), asset management philosophy (e.g., programs delivering a management system based on managed time-and-materials), and internal management (in-house managed programs). The last step in selecting the right program is insisting that proper performance measurements be built into the proposed management program. A well-managed program provides results in three general areas: financial outcomes, operational improvements and process improvements. Financial outcomes are the easiest to measure. Operational and process improvements are more challenging to assess but equally important to the program's overall success. To accurately identify results in these three areas, the overall management program should measure the following eight separate components: procedures and support for department staff; equipment inventory, benchmark costs, and budget guidelines; experienced equipment support team; objective, independent analysis of maintenance events; repair documentation and reporting; vendor relations; equipment acquisition analysis; and recommendations for improvement. Do everything you reasonably can to assure that the selected company can work side-by-side with you, providing objective, measurable advice that is ultimately in your best interest. You will then know that you have been thorough in your marketplace selection and can confidently move into implementation, expecting tangible and successful results.
authors.affiliation: USCS Equipment Technology Solutions, Brookfield, Wis., USA. ddeinstadt@us-cs.com
authors.forename: Deborah C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Deinstadt
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking / Q000191:economics; D002017:Budgets; D003284:Contract Services / Q000592:standards; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation*; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D005568:Forms and Records Control; D008284:Maintenance and Engineering, Hospital / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014481:United States