title: Induced rotational motion with nonabutting inducing and induced stimuli: implications regarding two forms of induced motion.
abstract: Induced motion is the illusory motion of a static stimulus in the opposite direction to a moving stimulus. Two types of induced motion have been distinguished: (a) when the moving stimulus is distant from the static stimulus and undergoes overall displacement, and (b) when the moving stimulus is pattern viewed within fixed boundaries that abut the static stimulus. Explanations of the 1st type of induced motion refer to mediating phenomena, such as vection, whereas the 2nd type is attributed to local processing by motion-sensitive neurons. The present research was directed to a display that elicited induced rotational motion with the characteristics of both types of induced motion: the moving stimulus lay within fixed boundaries, but the inducing and induced stimuli were distant from each other. The author investigated the properties that distinguished the two types of induced motion. In 3 experiments, induced motion persisted indefinitely, interocular transfer of the aftereffect of induced motion was limited to about 20%, and the time-course of the aftereffect of induced motion could not be attributed to vection. Those results were consistent with fixed-boundary induced motion. However, they could not be explained by local processing. Instead, the results might reflect the detection of object motion within a complex flow-field that resulted from the observer's motion.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, County Antrim, Northern Ireland. ah.reinhardt-rutland@ulster.ac.uk
authors.forename: A H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Reinhardt-Rutland
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009038:Motion; D009903:Optical Illusions; D012399:Rotation; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology