title: Making causal judgments from the proportion of confirming instances: the pCI rule.
abstract: It is proposed that causal judgments about contingency information are derived from the proportion of confirmatory instances (pCI) that are evaluated as confirmatory for the causal candidate. In 6 experiments, pCI values were manipulated independently of objective contingencies assessed by the deltaP rule. Significant effects of the pCI manipulations were found in all cases, but causal judgments did not vary significantly with objective contingencies when pCI was held constant. The experiments used a variety of stimulus presentation procedures and different dependent measures. The power PC theory, a weighted version of the deltaP rule, the Rescorla-Wagner associative learning model (R. A. Rescorla & A. R Wagner, 1972), and the deltaD rule, which is the frequency-based version of the pCI rule, were unable to account for the significant effects of the pCI manipulations. These results are consistent with a general explanatory approach to causal judgment involving the evaluation of evidence and updating of beliefs with regard to causal hypotheses.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom. whitepa@cardiff.ac.uk
authors.forename: Peter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: White
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011897:Random Allocation