Familial versus mass selection in small populations.
We used diffusion approximations and a Markov-chain approach to investigate the consequences of familial selection on the viability of small populations both in the short and in the long term. The outcome of familial selection was compared to the case of a random mating population under mass selection. In small populations, the higher effective size, associated with familial selection, resulted in higher fitness for slightly deleterious and/or highly recessive alleles. Conversely, because familial selection leads to a lower rate of directional selection, a lower fitness was observed for more detrimental genes that are not highly recessive, and with high population sizes. However, in the long term, genetic load was almost identical for both mass and familial selection for populations of up to 200 individuals. In terms of mean time to extinction, familial selection did not have any negative effect at least for small populations (N< or =50). Overall, familial selection could be proposed for use in management programs of small populations since it increases genetic variability and short-term viability without impairing the overall persistence times.
Theodorou
Konstantinos
K
Muséum national d'histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d'oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France.
Couvet
Denis
D
D005190:Family; D040741:Genetic Load; D005828:Genetics, Population; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation / Q000235:genetics; D011156:Population Density; D012641:Selection, Genetic