Comparison of monophasic and biphasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation between monophasic damped sine waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks at a high initial energy level and with a conventional paddle position.


METHODS
Prospective randomised study.


METHODS
227 patients admitted for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to a tertiary referral centre.


RESULTS
70% of 109 patients treated with an initial 200 J monophasic shock were cardioverted to sinus rhythm, compared with 80% of 118 patients treated with an initial 120 J biphasic shock (NS). After the second shock (360 J monophasic or 200 J biphasic), 90% of the patients were in sinus rhythm in both groups. The mean cumulative energy used for successful cardioversion was 306 J for monophasic shocks and 159 J for biphasic shocks (p < 0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
A protocol using monophasic waveform shocks in a 200-360 J sequence has the same efficacy (90%) as a protocol using rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks in a 120-200 J sequence. This equal efficacy is achieved with a significantly lower mean delivered energy level using the rectilinear biphasic shock waveform. The potential advantage of lower energy delivery for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation needs further study.
Scholten
M
M
Erasmus University Medical Centre, Thoraxcentre, Department of Clinical Electrophysiology, Rotterdam, Netherlands. m.f.scholten@erasmusmc.nl
Szili-Torok
T
T
Klootwijk
P
P
Jordaens
L
L
D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000628:therapy*; D004554:Electric Countershock / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012008:Recurrence