title: Value of some clinical provocative tests in carpal tunnel syndrome: do we need electrophysiology and can we predict the outcome?
abstract: Despite the high incidence of CTS, there are no precise diagnostic criteria. The history is useful, but the value of so-called provocative tests is questionable. Electrophysiology is required in the atypical cases; however, it has no prognostic value. There is no good correlation between electrophysiology and symptoms. The outcome seems to be favorable in patients without workmen's compensation, with a mild to moderate impairment preoperatively, and with a favorable response to carpal tunnel infiltration. Postoperatively the electrophysiologic parameters ameliorate symptoms, but this is not correlated to the patient's satisfaction.
authors.affiliation: Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Luc.DESMET@uz.kuleuven.ac.be
authors.forename: Luc
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: De Smet
mesh_terms: D002349:Carpal Tunnel Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D004568:Electrodiagnosis; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests