title: Evidence-based treatment of stuttering: IV. Empowerment through evidence-based treatment practices.
abstract: Assertion-based treatments for stuttering have historically been more popular than evidence-based treatments. In this paper it is argued that the use of evidence-based treatments for stuttering is professionally empowering for clinicians, but that the use of assertion-based treatments is a circular process that inhibits professional development. The arguments in favor of evidence-based treatment are elaborated under headings of "professional investment," "professional development and diversity," and "optimizing treatment efficacy."
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The reader will understand and be able (1) to describe the distinction between assertion-based and evidence-based treatment practices (2) to present a series of arguments that evidence-based treatment practices are professionally empowering.
authors.affiliation: Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia. M.Onslow@fhs.usyd.edu.au
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Onslow
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D011361:Professional Competence; D013342:Stuttering / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome