The Human Genome Project--threat or promise?
This paper reflects on some of the arguments against screening from the perspective of a relative of individuals with Fragile X syndrome. It proposes to think about intellectual disability (ID) as including a wide range of limitations beyond that of only the mental handicap. It argues that these limitations impose conditions upon both people with disabilities and their parents, as well as upon their siblings, that in various ways amount to suffering. The claim that people with disabilities are enriching the lives of their relatives is rejected. Furthermore, it is argued that those who ascribe a high moral status to people with disabilities tend to neglect that society does not make much of an effort to offer the necessary support to materialize this status. The claim that screening negatively affects the moral status of persons with ID is rebutted on grounds of the freedom of choice.
Carmichael
B
B
Southend Hospital NHS Trust, UK. barbara@famcarmichael.fsnet.co.uk
D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D005600:Fragile X Syndrome / Q000235:genetics*; D016045:Human Genome Project; D006801:Humans; D008967:Molecular Biology / Q000639:trends*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis; D013315:Stress, Psychological