Identity, difference and the ethical politics of prenatal testing.
This paper explores the role of identity in relation to the ethics of prenatal testing for conditions that cause intellectual disabilities. Specifically, it considers the question of identity and the moral status of the fetus. It argues that both the arguments in favour and opposed to prenatal testing mistakenly presuppose that there is no moral status attached to the fetus. That status is grounded in an identity-constituting characteristic, such as 'intellectual disability', which is brought about by the purpose of genetic testing, and the meaning of which is culturally constructed. This paper examines the implications this has for the debate around both prenatal testing and termination in general and considers the nature of the ethical politics which follows from this position with regard to prenatal testing related to intellectual disability.
Stainton
T
T
School of Social Work and Family Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. timst@interchange.ubc.ca
D000028:Abortion, Induced; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008607:Intellectual Disability / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods; D011057:Politics; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000941:ethics*; D012933:Social Identification