Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis.
OBJECTIVE
To compare methods of assessing fatigue.


METHODS
Cross sectional.


METHODS
Community.


METHODS
Forty Multile Sclerosis (MS) patients and 20 healthy controls.


METHODS
Fatigue questionnaires, SDSA dot cancellation test, finger tapping test, TEA Lottery.


RESULTS
The MS patients had significantly higher levels of fatigue than the controls on the Task Induced Fatigue Scale, Fatigue Severity Scale and Fatigue Impact Scale. The Task Induced Fatigue Scale completed whilst imagining oneself driving and the Fatigue Assessment Instrument did not differentiate between MS patients and controls. Finger tapping differentiated between MS patients and controls but there was no significant difference between MS patients and controls on visual and auditory concentration tests. A factor analysis indicated that questionnaire measures of fatigue were interrelated but independent of objective test performance.


CONCLUSIONS
Questionnaire measures can be used to assess fatigue in people with MS. The FSS differentiated MS patients from controls and is relatively short. It was therefore recommended for clinical use.
Chipchase
S Y
SY
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, UK.
Lincoln
N B
NB
Radford
K A
KA
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005221:Fatigue / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009103:Multiple Sclerosis / Q000150:complications*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires