title: Quality of the stroke rehabilitation research.
abstract: The Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review revealed a wide range of quality scores across primary studies. The aim of this section is to determine what differences there are across studies and to provide a detailed examination of methodological issues in the stroke rehabilitation literature. Methodology of each article was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) quality scale. Mean PEDro scores and percentage of studies meeting individual PEDro criteria were determined for all studies, for therapy-based studies only, and for drug-based studies only. It was noted that the stroke rehabilitation literature lacked rigor in the area of concealed allocation, blinding of the assessor, and intention-to-treat analysis. Investigation of the methodological quality of stroke rehabilitation literature emphasizes the need for improved treatment protocols, taking into account previous deficits, during research.
authors.affiliation: St. Joseph's Health Care London, Parkwood Site, London, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Sanjit K
authors.initials: SK
authors.lastname: Bhogal
authors.forename: Robert W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Teasell
authors.forename: Norine C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Foley
authors.forename: Mark R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Speechley
mesh_terms: D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D012196:Review Literature as Topic; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation