title: Evaluation of the effects of primary myotomy in total laryngectomy on the neoglottis with the use of quantitative videofluoroscopy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the influence of primary myotomy on characteristics of the neoglottis in patients after laryngectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patient survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nineteen consecutive patients who underwent laryngectomy (12 with primary lateral myotomy of the upper esophageal sphincter [marked by metal clips]; 7 not requiring myotomy [according to intraoperative palpation]).
  
  
  METHODS
  Videofluoroscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Visual assessments and quantitative measures of the neoglottis were used to study the relationships between myotomy, and anatomic and morphologic characteristics of the neoglottis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Quantitative measurements showed no difference between the neoglottic characteristics of the patients with (n = 12) and without (n = 7) myotomy, who were all judged to have moderate (n = 4) or good (n = 15) voice quality. Results for the entire patient group during phonation showed only 1 single neoglottic bar, no hypertonicity of the neoglottis, and a significant shortening of the neoglottic bar (P =.007). Results for the myotomy group during phonation showed elevation of the caudal clip (P =.046), shortening of the myotomy (P =.01), and decreased overlap of the cranial clip and the neoglottic bar (P =.007). Furthermore, significant relationships were found between the various quantitative measures of the neoglottis and those of the myotomy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Quantitative videofluoroscopy enables study of the influence of myotomy on the anatomic and morphologic characteristics of the neoglottis. Our results suggest that a planned myotomy of the upper esophageal sphincter is beneficial when prosthetic voice rehabilitation is applied after total laryngectomy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. b.opdecoul@kno.umcn.nl
authors.forename: Bas M R
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Op de Coul
authors.forename: Frank J A
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: van den Hoogen
authors.forename: Corina J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: van As
authors.forename: Henri A M
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Marres
authors.forename: Frank B M
authors.initials: FB
authors.lastname: Joosten
authors.forename: Johannes J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Manni
authors.forename: Frans J M
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Hilgers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000601:surgery*; D004943:Esophagogastric Junction / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000379:methods*; D005931:Glottis / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007822:Laryngeal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D007825:Laryngectomy / Q000379:methods*; D007831:Larynx, Artificial; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009130:Muscle, Smooth / Q000601:surgery*; D013072:Speech, Esophageal; D014132:Trachea / Q000601:surgery; D014743:Videotape Recording