Ethics roundtable debate: should a sedated dying patient be wakened to say goodbye to family?
Intensivists have the potential to maintain vital signs almost indefinitely, but not necessarily the potential to make moribund patients whole. Current ethical and legal mandates push patient autonomy to the forefront of care plans. When patients are incapable of expressing their preferences, surrogates are given proxy. It is unclear how these preferences extend to the very brink of inevitable death. Some say that patients should have the opportunity and authority to direct their death spiral. Others say it would be impossible for them to do so because an inevitable death spiral cannot be effectively palliated. Humane principles dictate they be spared the unrelenting discomfort surrounding death. The present case examines such a patient and the issues surrounding a unique end-of-life decision.
Batchelor
Anna
A
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, UK.
Jenal
Leslie
L
Kapadia
Farhad
F
Streat
Stephen
S
Whetstine
Leslie
L
Woodcock
Brian
B
D026686:Beneficence; D005195:Family Relations; D006801:Humans; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives / Q000008:administration & dosage; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000941:ethics*; D008020:Life Support Care / Q000941:ethics*; D008297:Male; D018447:Medical Futility; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D015742:Propofol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D019452:Terminally Ill; D014342:Truth Disclosure / Q000941:ethics*; D014481:United States
D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D015742:Propofol