title: The math of making mutant mice.
abstract: More than ten large-scale mutagenesis projects are now generating hundreds of novel mouse mutants. Projects employ a wide variety of strategies and screens: targeting as much as the whole genome, part of a chromosome or just single genes. In this commentary, we consider the pros and cons of different tactics. We highlight issues of cost, efficiency and defend the impact of this mutagenesis program in an era of sophisticated conditional knockouts and advanced transgenic lines. Given the significant difficulties of adequately phenotyping and mapping randomly generated mutations that cover the whole genome, we tend to favor regional and gene-targeted screens. Whatever the choice of method, whole genome sequence data combined with detailed transcriptome and proteome surveys promise to significantly improve the efficiency with which series of mutations in a large subset of mammalian genes can be generated and cloned.
authors.affiliation: Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Madison Avenue, Memphis, TN 38163, USA. rwilliam@nb.utmem.edu
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Flaherty
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Threadgill
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005038:Ethylnitrosourea; D016678:Genome; D051379:Mice; D018345:Mice, Knockout; D008822:Mice, Transgenic / Q000235:genetics*; D008957:Models, Genetic; D016296:Mutagenesis; D009153:Mutagens; D009154:Mutation
chemical_list: D009153:Mutagens; D005038:Ethylnitrosourea