Changes in biomarkers from space radiation may reflect dose not risk.
This presentation evaluates differences between radiation biomarkers of dose and risk and demonstrates the consequential problems associated with using biomarkers to do risk calculations following radiation exposures to the complex radiation environment found in deep space. Dose is a physical quantity, while risk is a biological quantity. Dose does not predict risk. This manuscript discusses species sensitivity factors, tissue weighting factors, and radiation quality factors derived from relative biological effectiveness (RBE). These factors are used to modify dose to make it a better predictor of risk. At low doses, where it is not possible to measure changes in risk, biomarkers have been used incorrectly as an intermediate step in predicting risk. Examples of biomarkers that do not predict risk are reviewed. Species sensitivity factors were evaluated using the Syrian hamster and the Wistar rat. Although the frequency of chromosome damage is very similar in these two species, the Wistar rat is very sensitive to radiation-induced lung cancer while the Syrian hamster is very resistant. To illustrate problems involved in using tissue weighting factors, rat trachea and deep lung tissues were compared. The similar level of chromosome damage observed in these two tissues would predict that the risk for cancer induction would be the same. However, even though large numbers of deep lung tumors result from inhaled radon, under the same exposure conditions there has never been a tracheal tumor observed. Finally, the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) used to generate "quality factors" that convert exposure and dose from different types of radiation to a single measure of risk, is discussed. Important risk comparisons are done at very low doses, where the response to the reference radiation has been shown to either increase or decrease as a function of dose. Thus, the RBE and the subsequent risk predicted is more dependent on the background response of the endpoint and the shape of the dose response to the reference radiation than it is on the radiation type of interest. A large study using micronuclei as biomarkers following exposure to different energies of mono-energetic neutrons, x-rays and gamma rays delivered at very low doses (0.0 to 0.10 Gy) is reported. As additional biomarkers of risk involved in critical steps in the carcinogenic process are developed, it may become possible to base risk estimates on biological change rather than the radiation energy deposition or dose.
Brooks
Antone L
AL
Washington State University Tri-Cities, Richland, WA 99352, USA. Tbrooks@tricity.wsu.edu
Lei
Xingye C
XC
Rithidech
Kanokporn
K
D000818:Animals; D015415:Biomarkers; D003359:Cosmic Radiation; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D005720:Gamma Rays; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000209:etiology; D008214:Lymphocytes / Q000528:radiation effects; D048629:Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective; D009381:Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced; D009502:Neutrons; D011834:Radiation Monitoring / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011853:Radiobiology / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012062:Relative Biological Effectiveness; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013045:Species Specificity; D014965:X-Rays
D015415:Biomarkers