Insertion of alpha1S II-III loop and C terminal sequences into alpha1H fails to restore excitation-contraction coupling in dysgenic myotubes.
The L-type Ca2+ channel in skeletal muscle (alpha1S) is essential for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. Previous studies using chimeras composed of alpha1S together with alpha1C or alpha1M demonstrated the importance of the alpha1S II-III loop and of a smaller subdomain (residues 720-764; 'ECC') in skeletal EC coupling. However, these chimeras failed to test the significance of regions outside the II-III loop, which are highly conserved between alpha1S and alpha1C. Therefore, we have injected dysgenic (alpha1S-lacking) myotubes with cDNAs encoding chimeras between alpha1S and the highly divergent T-type Ca2+ channel, alpha1H. The chimeras consisted of GFP-tagged alpha1H with one or more of the following substitutions: alpha1S II-III loop residues 720-764 ('ECC'), a putative targeting domain of the alpha1S C terminus ('target'; residues 1543-1662) or the entire alpha1S C terminus ('Cterm'; residues 1382-1873). The presence of either target or Cterm affected the expression and/or kinetics of whole-cell currents recorded from both dysgenic muscle cells and tsa-201 cells. Importantly, substitution of ECC alone into GFP-alpha1H (GFP-alpha1H + ECC), or together with either target (GFP-alpha1H + ECC + target) or Cterm (GFP-alpha1H + ECC + Cterm), was insufficient to restore electrically evoked contractions. Depolarization-induced fluorescence transients for GFP-alpha1H + ECC, GFP-alpha1H + ECC + target or GFP-alpha1H + ECC + Cterm had a bell shaped dependence upon membrane voltage (inconsistent with skeletal EC coupling) and were also exceedingly small (unlike cardiac EC coupling). The absence of EC coupling for these chimeras raises the possibility that regions of alpha1S outside of ECC and target are necessary for providing the context that allows these two domains to function in EC coupling and targeting, respectively. Additionally, an inadequate membrane density of the chimeras may have contributed to the lack of coupling.
Wilkens
Christina M
CM
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Beam
Kurt G
KG
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D002118:Calcium / Q000378:metabolism; D020746:Calcium Channels, L-Type / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D020747:Calcium Channels, T-Type / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D002460:Cell Line; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D018076:DNA, Complementary / Q000235:genetics; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D015870:Gene Expression; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins; D008164:Luminescent Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D051379:Mice; D008817:Mice, Mutant Strains; D018613:Microscopy, Confocal; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D018485:Muscle Fibers, Skeletal / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D009154:Mutation; D011993:Recombinant Fusion Proteins / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D019837:Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel / Q000502:physiology; D014162:Transfection
D020746:Calcium Channels, L-Type; D020747:Calcium Channels, T-Type; D018076:DNA, Complementary; D008164:Luminescent Proteins; D011993:Recombinant Fusion Proteins; D019837:Ryanodine Receptor Calcium Release Channel; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins; D002118:Calcium