title: Comparison of two methods of space prediction in the mixed dentition.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study compares the accuracy of space prediction for the unerupted permanent canines and premolars by a recognized method of mixed dentition space analysis (Moyers technique) vs estimation by simple visual observation (SVO).
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty clinicians with varying levels of dental experience and training blindly assessed study models of 4 intact arches (2 maxillary and 2 mandibular) from 3 patients in the mixed dentition using both Moyers and SVO space prediction methods. Corresponding full-mouth panoramic radiographs were available for each case. Follow-up records of the eventual outcome in the permanent dentition for each case available (ie, study models prior to any form of orthodontic intervention) served as the standard for further comparison of the space predictions made. Predictions by both methods were compared with each other as well as with the eventual space situation in the permanent dentition.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The differences in overall mean space prediction between the Moyers technique (excluding molar shift) and SVO ranged between 3.67 mm to 6.9 mm (lower arches) and 4.3 mm to 4.8 mm (upper arches). Diagnostic consistency between both methods' predictions was highly variable, with correlation ranging from moderate (r = 0.53, P = .01) to very weak (r = -0.1). Generally, more crowding was estimated with the SVO method's predictions. However, the inclusion of molar shift in the Moyers analysis resulted in the prediction of more crowding in the mandible compared to SVO and eventual outcome in the permanent dentition. The range and variability in predictions were always smaller with the Moyers technique compared to SVO. Neither technique's mean space prediction more closely resembled the eventual space situation in the permanent dentition.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study demonstrated that although the Moyers technique demonstrated less variation and more reproducibility than SVO in its space predictions, neither of the techniques was any more accurate in predicting the final space outcome in the permanent dentition.
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001641:Bicuspid / Q000473:pathology; D002648:Child; D003481:Cuspid / Q000473:pathology; D003724:Dental Arch / Q000473:pathology*; D003818:Dentition, Mixed; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000209:etiology; D008334:Mandible / Q000473:pathology; D008437:Maxilla / Q000473:pathology; D009811:Odontometry / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011862:Radiography, Panoramic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014078:Tooth Eruption / Q000502:physiology; D014097:Tooth, Unerupted / Q000473:pathology*