Immobility as an avoidance response, and its disruption by drugs.
Much of the available literature on avoidance behavior is based on responses which require the animal to run, lever-press, or to make some active response to avoid noxious stimulation. The purpose of Experiment I reported in this paper was to determine whether animals can learn to sit or stand motionless in order to escape or avoid electric shock. Five experimental rats were given escape-avoidance training, while five yoked control animals received electric shocks without any response-related contingency. It was shown that an immobility avoidance response, as distinct from the unconditioned "freezing" response to shock, can be trained. The results of Experiment II (30 rats) revealed that this response is more readily acquired at higher shock intensities than at lower ones, provided escape by jumping is prevented at the high shock intensities. The effects of six doses of each of three drugs on the immobility avoidance response were studied in Experiment III (13 rats). Methylphenidate, chlorpromazine, and imipramine all produced a decrement in the immobility response, but the pattern and amount of the effects of the three drugs were quite different, one from the other. The implications of these findings for a general theory of avoidance behavior and for drug screening are discussed.
D000818:Animals; D001362:Avoidance Learning; D002746:Chlorpromazine; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D004597:Electroshock; D007099:Imipramine; D007858:Learning; D008124:Locomotion; D008774:Methylphenidate; D051381:Rats
D008774:Methylphenidate; D007099:Imipramine; D002746:Chlorpromazine
AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CHLORPROMAZINE; IMIPRAMINE; LOCOMOTION; METHYLPHENIDATE