Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?
This study evaluates the correlation of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with the operative vessel findings in living kidney donors. The intraoperative vessel findings of 52 living renal donors were compared with the preoperative diagnoses of each imaging technique. Sixty-seven arteries were found during explantation. Forty kidneys showed a single arterial blood supply, and 12 kidneys showed a multiple arterial blood supply. No advantage of either imaging method was found for arterial imaging. There were 55 veins identified during organ harvesting. MRA could not determine the venous system in one donor (1.9%) and failed to detect one small pole vein in another. DSA did not yield a venous diagnosis in seven patients (13.5%) and yielded misdiagnoses in four patients. The correct diagnosis of renal donor veins differed significantly in favor of MRA (kappa 0.79 vs. 0.45; P=0.008). MRA is superior to DSA in assessing the renal vasculature in living kidney donors.
D000792:Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007668:Kidney / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000502:physiology*; D019520:Living Donors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D009392:Nephrectomy; D018579:Patient Selection; D012077:Renal Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D012082:Renal Veins / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome