Anterior Z250 resin composite restorations: one-year evaluation of clinical performance.
The purpose of this practice-based study was to compare the clinical performance of a new universal composite resin material (Z250) used for Class III and V cavities in anterior teeth. Restorative materials (Z250 and Z100; 3 M ESPE) placed by six operators were used for a total of 150 restorations during the 6-month enrollment period. After 1 year, 141 restorations (76 Z250 and 66 Z100) were available and evaluated for overall quality, color match, marginal adaptation, surface appearance and the presence of secondary caries, using modified USPHS criteria. The overall quality was excellent for both materials and no significant changes were noted during the follow-up. None of the scores between the two materials were statistically significant. Major changes were seen in color match and surface appearance. At baseline, the color match of 71% of Z250 and 62% of Z100 was rated as Alfa, after 1 year the figures were 60 and 65%. Regarding surface appearance, 97% of the Z250 were rated Alfa at baseline, whereas at 1 year the figure was 76%. For Z100, the scores were 94 and 79%, respectively. After 1 year, the clinical performance of Z250 restorative composite resin was clinically acceptable and similar to that of Z100.
D000328:Adult; D003116:Color; D003188:Composite Resins; D003481:Cuspid; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation; D003763:Dental Leakage; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D004955:Esthetics, Dental; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D013499:Surface Properties; D015040:Zirconium
D003188:Composite Resins; C444701:Filtek Z250; C083568:Z100 composite resin; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; D015040:Zirconium