Thinking outside the body: an advantage for spatial updating during imagined versus physical self-rotation.
Three studies examined effects of different response measures on spatial updating during self-rotation. In Experiment 1, participants located objects in an array with a pointer after physical self-rotation, imagined self-rotation, and a rotation condition in which they ignored superfluous sensorimotor signals. In line with previous research, updating performance was found to be superior in the physical self-rotation condition compared with the other 2. In Experiment 2, participants performed in identical rotation movement conditions but located objects by verbal labeling rather than pointing. Within the verbal modality, an advantage for updating during imagined self-rotation was found. In Experiment 3, participants performed physical and imagined self-rotations only and used a pointing response offset from their physical reference frames. Performance was again superior during imagined self-rotations. The results suggest that it is not language processing per se that improves updating performance but rather a general reduction of the conflict between physical and projected egocentric reference frames.
D001288:Attention; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011434:Proprioception; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012399:Rotation; D013850:Thinking; D014705:Verbal Behavior