title: Considerations for ethical practice in managed care.
abstract: How does one maintain an ethical practice while facing the requirements and limits of a health care system that is dominated by managed care? Psychologists are increasingly raising such questions about ethical issues when working in or contracting with managed care organizations. The authors review the process involved in ethical decision making and problem solving and focus on 4 areas in which ethical dilemmas most commonly arise in a managed care context: informed consent, confidentiality, abandonment, and utilization management-utilization review. The need for sustained and organized advocacy efforts to ensure patient access to quality health care is discussed, as is the impact of managed care's competitive marketplace on professional relationships. Hypothetical examples of typical dilemmas psychologists face in the current practice environment are provided to illustrate systematic ethical decision making.
mesh_terms: D032781:Codes of Ethics; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000941:ethics; D003657:Decision Making; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D008329:Managed Care Programs / Q000941:ethics; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D011584:Psychology / Q000941:ethics*; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000941:ethics; D016079:Refusal to Treat / Q000941:ethics; D014600:Utilization Review
keywords: Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Health Care and Public Health