title: [Does a Combined Fascial Sling - Burch Colposuspension Display Advantages over a Fascial Sling alone for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence in Females?].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Despite the development of new surgical techniques, the fascial sling procedure remains an important surgical technique for the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence. An advantage of combining it with an additional Burch colposuspension has been suggested. The objective of our study was to evaluate retrospectively selected patients who had undergone a fascial sling procedure with and without Burch colposuspension.
  
  
  METHODS
  Of a total of 390 females who underwent an incontinence operation at our department between 1990 and 1999, 56 patients had had a fascial sling plasty. A total of 50 patients (89 %) were followed for a median of 59.5 months. The median age was 60 years. 56 % of the patients displayed recurrent stress incontinence. The previous operations had been performed via a vaginal approach in 42.9 % and an abdominal approach in 57.1 %. The sling procedure used was that of Narik and Palmrich. Of the 50 patients, 14 had an additional Burch colposuspension.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The continence rates (no pads) were for patients with a fascial sling procedure alone 63.9 % and for the combination of both operations 64.4 %. An improvement (1-3 pads) was seen in 27.8 % and 21.4 %, respectively. No changes were seen in 5.6 % and 7.1 % and impairment was seen in 2.7 % and 7.1 %, respectively. After a five-year follow-up, the total patient satisfaction rate was 78 %.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The fascial sling is effective operative technique for treating female urinary stress incontinence, especially in severe and type III incontinence and in patients who had undergone previous operations for incontinence. The operation is safe and is the only technique that offers controlled overcorrection in desperate cases. An advantage of adding a Burch colposuspension to the fascial sling procedure was not detected in our patient group.
authors.affiliation: Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Germany. jpfitz@gmx.net
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pfitzenmaier
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gilfrich
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Faldum
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Müller
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hohenfellner
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Thüroff
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004414:Dyspareunia / Q000209:etiology; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012008:Recurrence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014563:Urodynamics; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures