Task demands, task interest, and task performance: implications for human subjects research and practicing what we preach.
Through the continuous investigation of humans in organizations, we have learned much about motivation, attitudes, and performance. For example, Yukl and others have helped increase our understanding of influence tactics and the effect they have on the performance of subordinates, supervisors, and peers. Some tactics (and combinations of tactics) lead to resistance, some lead to compliance, and some lead to commitment. In this study, we raise the question of whether or not we incorporate our knowledge of these research findings into the design, implementation, and interpretation of our own research studies that require the participation of human subjects. In a survey of 134 subjects from a previous social science study, we found that performance varied across the sample, consistent with the concepts of resistance, compliance, and commitment. In addition, the variance in performance could be explained, in part, by task interest and perceived task demands. Implications are discussed.
Eveleth
Daniel M
DM
Department of Business, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-3161, USA. eveleth@uidaho.edu
Pillutla
Arun
A
D000328:Adult; D035841:Behavioral Research; D032962:Consent Forms; D003625:Data Collection; D008192:Deception; D003657:Decision Making; D030881:Disclosure; D006805:Human Experimentation; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009042:Motivation; D012107:Research Design; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000523:psychology*; D012942:Social Sciences; D013334:Students; D014495:Universities