Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies to evaluate abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer compared to the clinical touch method.


METHODS
Meta-analysis.


METHODS
Four studies performed in academic research centers in Barcelona, Vizcaya, Hong Kong, and Madrid.


METHODS
A total of 2,051 patients: 1,024 received ultrasound-guided embryo transfers and 1,027 received clinical touch method transfers.


METHODS
Fourteen studies were retrieved from the literature, but only four of them fitted our selection criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software with the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method and the fixed effect model.


METHODS
The primary outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates. The secondary outcome measures were the incidences of ectopic pregnancies, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancies, and difficult transfers.


RESULTS
Compared to the clinical touch method, abdominal ultrasound-guided transfer significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate and the ongoing pregnancy rate. There was no effect on the incidence of ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, or miscarriage rate. CONCLSUION(S): Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer increases the clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates significantly compared to the clinical touch method.
Sallam
Hassan N
HN
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. hnsallam@link.net
Sadek
Sameh S
SS
D000022:Abortion, Spontaneous / Q000453:epidemiology; D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D016017:Odds Ratio; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D011271:Pregnancy, Ectopic / Q000453:epidemiology; D011272:Pregnancy, Multiple / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D014463:Ultrasonography