title: Bonding of photo and dual-cure adhesives to root canal dentin.
abstract: This study evaluated the regional tensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin composite core material to root canal dentin using photo and dual-cure adhesives and different modes of polymerization. Nineteen extracted premolars were decoronated and their root canals prepared to a depth of 8 mm and a width of 1.4 mm using Para Post drills. For the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) test, 15 roots were randomly divided into five groups and their canal walls treated with a dual-cure self-etching primer (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V Primer, Kuraray Medical Co, Japan). Adhesive resin (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V Bond A) was applied to two of the groups and light cured for 20 seconds. A dual-cure adhesive resin (Clearfil Liner Bond 2V Bond A+B, Kuraray Medical Co, Japan) was applied to the remaining three groups, one of which was light cured. The post spaces of all the groups were filled with a dual-cure resin composite (DC Core) and three were light cured for 60 seconds from a coronal direction. Chemical-cure resin composite was placed on the outer surfaces of the roots, which were then stored in water for 24 hours. They were serially sliced perpendicular to the bonded interface into eight 0.6 mm-thick slabs, then transversely sectioned into beams approximately 8 x 0.6 x 0.6 mm for the microTBS test. All of the failure modes were observed under SEM and analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis Rank test. For Knoop hardness testing, four specimens were prepared in a similar manner, two were light-cured and the other two chemically-cured. The specimens were longitudinally sectioned into two pieces, and three indentations were made at 100 microm intervals from a coronal to an apical direction in the eight halves. Data were divided into two groups (coronal/apical halves of post space) and analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Scheffe's test (p<0.05). For each curing strategy, there were no significant differences in microTBS and Knoop hardness between the coronal and apical regions (p>0.05). Light exposure of both the adhesive resin and resin composite resulted in significantly higher microTBS than chemical-cure alone (p<0.05). Light exposure also significantly increased Knoop hardness at both the coronal and apical regions (p<0.05). When the bonding resin and dual-cure resin composite were chemically-cured, failures occurred cohesively within the resin. Photo-initiated polymerization of the adhesive resin and dual-cure resin composite was necessary to achieve good bonding to root canal dentin, which was not dependent upon region.
authors.affiliation: Division of Conservative Dentistry, GKT Dental Institute, London, UK. richard_foxton@yahoo.co.uk
authors.forename: Richard M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Foxton
authors.forename: Masatoshi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nakajima
authors.forename: Junji
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tagami
authors.forename: Hiroyuki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Miura
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001641:Bicuspid; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D003804:Dentin; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D006244:Hardness; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D011176:Post and Core Technique; D019279:Resin Cements; D013718:Tensile Strength
chemical_list: C469237:Clearfil Core; C084544:Clearfil Linerbond System; D003188:Composite Resins; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D008689:Methacrylates; D011108:Polymers; D019279:Resin Cements