Effect of home-use bleaching gels on fluoride releasing restorative materials.
To evaluate the effects of two home-use bleaching gels (Nite-White and Contrast PM) on the surface roughness of one high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP), four polyacid-modified resin-based composites (Dyract AP, F2000, Elan and Compoglass F), two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Vitremer and Fuji II LC), a microfilled fluoride-releasing resin-based composite (Tetric) and a microfilled non-fluoridated resin-based composite (Valux) were used as controls. The null hypotheses tested were: (1) the use of bleaching gels would not result in surface roughness values different from those obtained at baseline; (2) differences in the amount of carbamide peroxide present in the gels would not influence surface roughness. Thirty specimen disks (the first 10 used for controls and the balance divided randomly into two groups) were made for each material according to the manufacturers' instructions. Finishing and polishing of the test and control specimens was performed after 24 hours using a sequential series of three (medium, fine and superfine) Sof-Lex disks, keeping the restoration surface wet. For every sequence, 10 strokes were made in one direction using a low-speed handpiece. Ultrasonic cleaning of the polished specimens was performed for two minutes in distilled water to remove any surface debris. Prior to bleaching treatment, the specimens were stored in 37 degrees C deionized water for 24 hours. The specimens were exposed to the bleaching gels for a period that simulated the equivalent of 15 days (eight hours/day) under bleaching treatment. The average surface roughness (Ra) of the control and treated specimens was measured. Three separate Ra measurements along the direction of rotation of the finishing and perpendicular to the finishing direction and edge of the mold were made for each specimen surface. After treatment with bleaching gels, there was an increase in surface roughness for F2000, Dyract AP, Elan, Valux and Tetric, while Fuji IX, Fuji II LC, Vitremer and Compoglass F displayed decreased surface roughness values, suggesting that the effects of the gels appear to be material-dependent. Although Contrast PM contains 5% more carbamide peroxide as the active ingredient, the second null hypothesis was rejected for Fuji IX, Vitremer, Dyract AP, Compoglass F, Elan and Valux.
Cehreli
Zafer C
ZC
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Yazici
Ruya
R
García-Godoy
Franklin
F
D000077463:Carbamide Peroxide; D020770:Compomers / Q000737:chemistry; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005459:Fluorides / Q000737:chemistry; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D010545:Peroxides / Q000737:chemistry*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013499:Surface Properties; D014073:Tooth Bleaching / Q000379:methods; D014508:Urea / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000737:chemistry*
D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D010545:Peroxides; D000077463:Carbamide Peroxide; D014508:Urea; D005459:Fluorides