title: [Early esophageal replacement in patients with esophageal atresia].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  When primary anastomosis is not feasible in esophageal atresia esophageal replacement is one of the possible options. We report our experience with this approach in patients with long-gap esophageal atresia.
  
  
  METHODS
  From 1991 to 2002 we treated 50 children with esophageal atresia. Nine required esophageal replacement because of long-gaps. Six were boys and three girls. Six had isolated atresia, and three had regular atresia with TEF. Associated malformations in 8 patients were: cardiovascular (2), anorectal (2), urogenital (5), intestinal duplication (1), and costovertebral (1). The weight at birth ranged from 1.2 to 3.95 kg (median 2.3). Patients with type I atresia had immediate gastrostomy accompanied by esophagostomy in one. Esophageal anastomosis was impossible or failed in 3 patients with type III EA, who had fistula ligation and esophagostomy. Esophageal replacement was performed at a median age of 4.95 months (range 2.3 to 18), with a median weight of 5.33 (range 2.89 to 11.5 kg.). We used gastric pull-up in 2 cases and colonic transposition in 7 with isoperistaltic left transverse colon in retromediastinal-transhiatal (6) or restrosternal (1) position. Two patients had extramucosal piloromyotomy and 4 had piloroplasty.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All patients survive and have functional grafts. Postoperative complications were: pneumonia (1), wound dehiscence with evisceration (2) and salivary fístula (2) which closed spontaneously. In the long range, one patient was operated three times for hernia through the enlarged hiatus, one had one episode of intestinal subobstruction successfully managed with nasogastric aspiration and another one had dumping syndrome for several months. After a median follow-up of 3.15 years (range 1.6 to 6.9) all patients eat normal diets per os.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Esophageal replacement for the treatment of infants with long-gap EA has been in our hands as good as any other option with 100% survival and good functional results. The operation can be safely performed in the first months provided that associated malformations are under control. However, like other options, this approach is not devoid of complications.
authors.affiliation: Hospital Infantil La Paz, Departamento de Cirugía Pediátrica, Paseo de la Castellana 261, 28046 Madrid. Pacohern73@hotmail.com
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Hernández
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rivas
authors.forename: L F
authors.initials: LF
authors.lastname: Avila
authors.forename: A L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Luis
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Martínez
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lassaletta
authors.forename: F J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Murcia
authors.forename: J A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Tovar
mesh_terms: D004933:Esophageal Atresia / Q000601:surgery*; D004946:Esophagostomy / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male