title: Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Joint fractures observed in Targis/Vectris inlay adhesive fixed restorations may be related to the preparation design.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This in vitro study investigated the effects of the proximal tooth preparation design and the pontic distance on the fracture strength and the amount of bending of fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty extracted premolars and 40 molars were embedded in a PMMA resin to represent a premolar and molar mesiodistal separation distance of 7 mm and 11 mm, respectively. Two preparation designs were used (proximal box and tub-shaped). The sample size was 10 for each group. Fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures were fabricated by use of the Targis/Vectris system and luted adhesively to the teeth with Variolink luting agent. A vertical force was loaded to the center of the fixed partial dentures at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The initial bending (mm) prior to fracture was evaluated by measuring the distance the test rod moved from a 10 N preload to fracture. The differences in the mean fracture strength and the average amount of bending as a function of the preparation designs and pontic distances were compared by use of a 2-way analysis of variance (alpha=.05). The specimens were examined optically for the type of failure with a stereomicroscope. The fracture surface of the specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy, and radiography was used to investigate the surface morphological features at the failure sites and to determine the fracture mode. A chi-square test was used to identify the differences in the debonding rates between the types of preparation designs and the pontic distance (alpha=.05).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean fracture strength and the standard deviation of the fiber-reinforced inlay retained adhesive fixed partial denture group was 1368+/-212 N for the 7-mm tub group, 885+/-109 N for the 11-mm tub group, 1779+/-317 N for the 7-mm box group, and 1336+/-281 N for the 11-mm box group. The fracture strength was significantly higher in the 7-mm pontic distance (P<.001) and for the box-shaped tooth preparation (P<.001). The amount of bending was significantly greater in the 7-mm pontic distance (P=.025) and the box-shaped tooth preparation (P=.002). Debonding was observed only in premolar teeth and tub-shaped design groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The box-shaped tooth preparation may be considered for restoration of a missing single posterior tooth with fiber-reinforced inlay adhesive fixed partial dentures.
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University, Gangneung, South Korea.
authors.forename: Ho-Yong
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Song
authors.forename: Yang-Jin
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Yi
authors.forename: Lee-Ra
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Cho
authors.forename: Deok-Young
authors.initials: DY
authors.lastname: Park
mesh_terms: D000268:Adhesiveness; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D000044:Dental Abutments; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003779:Denture Design; D003830:Denture, Partial, Fixed; D005898:Glass / Q000737:chemistry; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D006801:Humans; D007284:Inlays; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D018583:Pliability; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry; D012823:Silicate Cement / Q000737:chemistry; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D019231:Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D003764:Dental Materials; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D019279:Resin Cements; C111282:dental polyglass; C009753:fiberglass; D012823:Silicate Cement; C103502:Variolink