Flap technology for reconstructions of urogenital organs.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this review is to summarize the different reconstructive options for urogenital indications. The development of various flap techniques to restore congenital and acquired urogenital defects is presented.


RESULTS
Various reconstructive techniques have been demonstrated recently. On the basis of the reconstructive requirements, two main techniques can be defined: the standard local or regional flap technique (pedicled flap) and the more sophisticated microvascular free flap technique. Free tissue transplantation (transfer) is a procedure that involves microvascular transplantation of a flap (a fasciocutaneous, muscle or composite flap) in one stage from a donor site in the body to a distant recipient site. The viability of the transplanted flap is maintained by microvascular anastomosis between the flap's vessels (at least one artery and one vein) and recipient vessels. Re-innervation and functioning muscle contraction is achieved by suturing the vessels and a motor nerve in the recipient area to a motor nerve of a free transplanted muscle. After regeneration of the nerve and re-innervation of the transplanted muscle, a functioning free transplanted muscle offers enough contractile capacity and strength to replace the function of the missing muscles at the recipient site. The technique of microvascular free tissue transfer necessitates extensive experience in microvascular technique and this approach could be efficiently applied in cooperation with other specialists. Recent studies show the development and clinical application of these new surgical techniques in urology (e.g. in the treatment of bladder acontractility using innervated free latissimus dorsi muscle and in the use of a free microvascular fillet lower leg flap for the reconstruction of a large pelvic-floor defect).


CONCLUSIONS
Various reconstructive requirements define the techniques for reconstruction. The main principle is to obtain optimal anatomical and functional reconstruction with minimal donor site morbidity. Depending on the etiology of the defect, different reconstructive options are available to optimize the reconstructive result. Optimal reconstruction might best be achieved by adopting an interdisciplinary approach in which the primary objective is to provide the best possible outcome for each patient. This review presents the main indications for and principles of flap selection according to the reconstructive requirements.
Ninković
Milomir
M
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Dabernig
Werner
W
D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009017:Morbidity; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000637:transplantation; D017773:Pelvic Floor / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D012003:Rectal Fistula / Q000601:surgery; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D001743:Urinary Bladder / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D001750:Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic / Q000601:surgery; D014555:Urination Disorders; D014565:Urogenital Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D014566:Urogenital System / Q000098:blood supply / Q000601:surgery; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery; D014719:Vesicovaginal Fistula / Q000601:surgery