Clinical assessment of tibial polyethylene thickness: comparison of radiographic measurements with as-implanted and as-retrieved thicknesses.
Sixty-six posterior cruciate-retaining inserts of one fixed-bearing design were revised because of wear or osteolysis. Tibial polyethylene thickness was estimated from standard anteroposterior radiographs and compared with the original or final minimum thicknesses. The most accurate method involved measuring the shortest distance from each femoral condyle to a transverse line through the middle of the baseplate's superior surface. On radiographs acquired 6 weeks after arthroplasty, the mean error was -0.1 mm (underestimate) +/- 0.6 mm (standard deviation), with 72% of the measurements within 0.5 mm of the original minimum thickness and 87% within 1.0 mm. The method was less accurate for radiographs made before revision, for which the mean error was 0.6 mm (overestimate) +/- 1.0 mm. In this study, 41% and 70% of the prerevision measurements were accurate to within 0.5 and 1.0 mm, respectively.
Collier
Matthew B
MB
Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, PO Box 7088, Alexandria, VA 22307, USA.
Jewett
Brian A
BA
Engh
C Anderson
CA
D001175:Arthrography / Q000379:methods*; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000494:pharmacology*; D020878:Device Removal; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D020959:Polyethylene / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation; D014894:Weights and Measures
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D020959:Polyethylene