Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.
This study examined how reach-to-grasp movements are modified during adaptation to external force perturbations applied on the arm during reach. Specifically, we examined whether the organization of these movements was dependent upon the condition under which the perturbation was applied. In response to an auditory signal, all subjects were asked to reach for a vertical dowel, grasp it between the index finger and thumb, and lift it a short distance off the table. The subjects were instructed to do the task as fast as possible. The perturbation was an elastic load acting on the wrist at an angle of 105 deg lateral to the reaching direction. The condition was modified by changing the predictability with which the perturbation was applied in a given trial. After recording unperturbed control trials, perturbations were applied first on successive trials (predictable perturbations) and then were applied randomly (unpredictable perturbations). In the early predictable perturbation trials, reach path length became longer and reaching duration increased. As more predictable perturbations were applied, the reach path length gradually decreased and became similar to that of control trials. Reaching duration also decreased gradually as the subjects adapted by exerting force against the perturbation. In addition, the amplitude of peak grip aperture during arm transport initially increased in response to repeated perturbations. During the course of learning, it reached its maximum and thereafter slightly decreased. However, it did not return to the normal level. The subjects also adapted to the unpredictable perturbations through changes in both arm transport and grasping components, indicating that they can compensate even when the occurrence of the perturbation cannot be predicted during the inter-trial interval. Throughout random perturbation trials, large grip aperture values were observed, suggesting that a conservative aperture level is set regardless of whether the reaching arm is perturbed or not. In addition, the results of the predictable perturbations showed that the time from movement onset to the onset of grip aperture closure changed as adaptation occurred. However, the spatial location where the onset of finger closure occurred showed minimum changes with perturbation. These data suggest that the onset of finger closure is dependent upon distance to target rather than the temporal relationship of the grasp relative to the transport phase of the movement.
Rand
M K
MK
Motor Control Laboratory, Arizona State University, Box 870404, Tempe, AZ 85287-0404, USA. rand@asu.edu
Shimansky
Y
Y
Stelmach
G E
GE
Bloedel
J R
JR
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D001132:Arm / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005246:Feedback / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology; D014953:Wrist / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology