title: A phylogenetic analysis of basal metabolism, total evaporative water loss, and life-history among foxes from desert and mesic regions.
abstract: We measured basal metabolic rate (BMR) and total evaporative water loss (TEWL) of species of foxes that exist on the Arabian Peninsula, Blanford's fox (Vulpes cana) and two subspecies of Red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Combining these data with that on other canids from the literature, we searched for specialization of physiological traits among desert foxes using both conventional least squares regression and regressions based on phylogenetic independent contrasts. Further, we explored the consequences of reduced body size of foxes on life history parameters such as litter size and neonate mass. For Blanford's foxes, Red foxes from the central desert of Arabia, and Red foxes from the more mesic Asir mountains, body mass averaged 1,285 +/- 52 g, 1,967 +/- 289 g, and 3,060 +/- 482 g, respectively, whereas mean BMR, during summer, was 304.5 +/- 32.3 kJ/day, 418.0 +/- 32.4 kJ/day, and 724.1 +/- 120.2 kJ/day (+/- SD). An analysis of covariance with body mass as a covariate showed no statistical differences in BMR among foxes. Analysis of covariance indicated that Red fox from the Asir mountains had a higher TEWL than Red foxes from central Arabia or than Blanford's foxes also from the mountains. Comparisons of all species of desert and mesic foxes showed no significant differences in BMR, nor did desert foxes have a significantly lower BMR than other carnivores. TEWL of desert foxes was lower than other more mesic carnivores; deviations in TEWL ranged from -17.7% for the Fennec fox (Fennecus zerda) to -57.4% for the Kit fox (Vulpes velox). Although desert foxes have a BMR comparable to other more mesic species, it appears that desert foxes do have a smaller body mass, lowering overall energy requirements. We attribute this reduction in body size to the "resource limitation hypothesis" whereby natural selection favors smaller individuals in a resource-limited environment, especially during periods of severe food shortage. However, until common garden experiments are performed, developmental plasticity and acclimation cannot be ruled out as contributors to this pattern.
authors.affiliation: Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, 318 W 12th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Williams.1020@osu.edu
authors.forename: J B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Muñoz-Garcia
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ostrowski
authors.forename: B I
authors.initials: BI
authors.lastname: Tieleman
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001481:Basal Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D001824:Body Constitution; D015992:Body Mass Index; D003889:Desert Climate; D005260:Female; D005589:Foxes / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D010101:Oxygen Consumption; D010802:Phylogeny; D013045:Species Specificity; D022722:Thermogenesis; D014867:Water / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism*; D014870:Water Loss, Insensible / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D014867:Water