Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision?
Peripheral vision plays an important role in normal reading, but its role becomes larger for visually impaired people with central-field loss. This experiment studied whether lexical processing differs in central and peripheral vision through the analysis of word-frequency effects in lexical decisions. We asked two main questions: (1) Do central and peripheral vision differ in the time course of lexical processing? and (2) do central and peripheral vision differ in the quality of lexical processing? To address the first question, we examined the time course of frequency effects in central and peripheral vision over a range from 25 to 500 ms. We found that significant frequency effects occurred for the shortest exposures, 25-50 ms, in central vision, whereas significant frequency effects did not occur in peripheral vision until 100 ms. To address the second question, we used word-frequency effects as a marker for the nature of lexical processing. We compared frequency effects in central and peripheral vision for data within matched ranges of percent accuracy (0-20%, 20-40%, 40-60%, 60-80%, and 80-100%). We found that there was no difference in the pattern of frequency effects in central and peripheral vision at equivalent performance levels. We conclude that lexical processing is slower in peripheral vision, but the quality of lexical processing is similar in central and peripheral vision.
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, 75 East River Road, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. leeh@umn.edu
Hye-Won
HW
Lee
Gordon E
GE
Legge
Alberto
A
Ortiz
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D011932:Reading; D014786:Vision Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D014794:Visual Fields; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*