How do tissues respond and adapt to stresses around a prosthesis? A primer on finite element stress analysis for orthopaedic surgeons.
Joint implant design clearly affects long-term outcome. While many implant designs have been empirically-based, finite element analysis has the potential to identify beneficial and deleterious features prior to clinical trials. Finite element analysis is a powerful analytic tool allowing computation of the stress and strain distribution throughout an implant construct. Whether it is useful depends upon many assumptions and details of the model. Since ultimate failure is related to biological factors in addition to mechanical, and since the mechanical causes of failure are related to load history, rather than a few loading conditions, chief among them is whether the stresses or strains under limited loading conditions relate to outcome. Newer approaches can minimize this and the many other model limitations. If the surgeon is to critically and properly interpret the results in scientific articles and sales literature, he or she must have a fundamental understanding of finite element analysis. We outline here the major capabilities of finite element analysis, as well as the assumptions and limitations.
Brand
Richard A
RA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Stanford
Clark M
CM
Swan
Colby C
CC
D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000295:instrumentation*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003238:Connective Tissue / Q000502:physiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D016348:Osseointegration / Q000502:physiology; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D013312:Stress, Physiological / Q000503:physiopathology*