Comparison of enterococcal populations in animals, humans, and the environment--a European study.
The objectives of the present study were to generate knowledge of enterococcal populations in the food chain, by studying the population structure (in measures of abundance and diversity) among enterococci in different geographical regions and in different parts of the food chain, as well as the similarities between different enterococcal populations. Altogether, 2868 samples were collected from humans (healthy and hospitalised individuals and clinical isolates), animals (slaughterhouse carcasses and farm animals), and the environment (pig farms, sewage, and surface water) in four European countries-Sweden, Denmark, UK, and Spain. The samples were characterised with regard to presence and numbers of enterococci, and eight (for faecal samples) or 24 (for environmental samples) isolates per sample were phenotyped and preliminarily identified with the PhP-RF system. In total, more than 20,000 isolates were typed. A majority of the samples (77%) showed the presence of presumed enterococci. The diversities of enterococci in environmental samples were generally high, and also faecal samples normally showed presence of more than one enterococcal strain. The most common species found were Enterococcus faecium (33%), E. faecalis (29%), and E. hirae (24%), but different enterococcal populations differed in their species distribution. Clinical isolates, hospitalised patients, and hospital sewage in Sweden showed a clear dominance of E. faecalis (80%, 57%, and 54%, respectively) whereas healthy individuals and urban sewage contained less E. faecalis (39% and 40%, respectively). The species distribution among isolates from slaughterhouses varied between animal species and also between countries, but E. faecalis seemed to be mainly associated with broiler, and E. hirae with cattle and pigs. The results from the study have indicated a simplified method to study the diversity of bacterial populations. Instead of collecting many samples and analysing one or a few isolates per sample, it is possible to collect fewer samples and analyse several isolates per sample. Both approaches yielded similar information on the diversity of the populations. Another useful information was that since samples from hospital sewage, urban sewage, and manure contained enterococcal populations that reflected those in faecal samples of hospitalised patients, healthy humans, and animals, respectively, such samples may be used as pooled faecal samples and may replace cumbersome samplings from many individuals.
Kühn
Inger
I
Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden. inger.kuhn@mtc.ki.se
Iversen
Aina
A
Burman
Lars G
LG
Olsson-Liljequist
Barbro
B
Franklin
Anders
A
Finn
Maria
M
Aarestrup
Frank
F
Seyfarth
Anne Mette
AM
Blanch
Anicet R
AR
Vilanova
Xavier
X
Taylor
Huw
H
Caplin
Jonathan
J
Moreno
Miguel A
MA
Dominguez
Lucas
L
Herrero
Inmaculada A
IA
Möllby
Roland
R
D000818:Animals; D015373:Bacterial Typing Techniques; D002417:Cattle; D002645:Chickens; D017753:Ecosystem; D016983:Enterococcus / Q000145:classification* / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D004783:Environmental Microbiology; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D062665:Epidemiological Monitoring; D005060:Europe / Q000453:epidemiology; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D005843:Geography; D016908:Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000382:microbiology*; D006801:Humans; D008372:Manure / Q000382:microbiology; D017744:Medical Waste Disposal; D010641:Phenotype; D010802:Phylogeny; D013045:Species Specificity; D013552:Swine; D014871:Water Microbiology
D008372:Manure; D017744:Medical Waste Disposal