Myocardial contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion at rest in a patient with left main coronary artery stenosis.
The present case will focus on the potential of hypoperfusion detection with myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) using power Doppler harmonic imaging (PDHI). PDHI is normally performed in a triggered mode. Microbubbles were destroyed by the ultrasound energy in the myocardium, and myocardium has to be refilled with microbubbles within the time interval between the ultrasound pulses to obtain repetitive information about perfusion. Using the contrast agent Levovist, however, real-time PDHI also results in myocardial opacification presumably due to perfusion signals of the arteriolar microbubble passage. A 45-year-old woman with typical stress-induced angina was admitted to our department for cardiac catheterization. Prior to the angiography a conventional echocardiogram showed normal left ventricular function. Tissue Doppler, however, demonstrated postsystolic longitudinal shortening of the septal, anterior, and lateral wall regions. Myocardial contrast echocardiography with triggered PDHI showed complete opacification of the myocardium at rest. Using real-time PDHI with Levovist, the septum could not be opacified. The consecutive angiography documented a severe unprotected main coronary artery stenosis. After angioplasty and stent implantation, MCE measurements were repeated. Repetitive intravenous bolus injections of Optison during triggered PDHI showed no differences to the investigation prior to the angioplasty. Using real-time PDHI with Levovist, however, there was a marked difference in comparison to the pre-interventional analysis. A complete opacification of the apical septum was observed. The present case suggests that different MCE techniques can analyze different compartments of the myocardial vasculature in clinical practice. This methodological comparison between triggered and real-time PDHI shows obviously differences in the DI signal detection due to the different microbubble behavior. Clinicians should be aware of the potentials of MCE to improve noninvasive diagnostic procedures in patients with ischemic heart disease.
Hagendorff
A
A
Department of Cardiology-Angiology, University of Leipzig, Johannisallee 32, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. hagea@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
Pfeiffer
D
D
Rother
T
T
Becher
H
H
D000418:Albumins; D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; D003287:Contrast Media; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003326:Coronary Circulation / Q000502:physiology*; D023921:Coronary Stenosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D018618:Echocardiography, Doppler, Color; D018619:Echocardiography, Doppler, Pulsed; D005260:Female; D005466:Fluorocarbons; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D045423:Microbubbles; D008875:Middle Aged; D009200:Myocardial Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D011134:Polysaccharides; D012016:Reference Values; D012146:Rest; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015607:Stents; D013318:Stroke Volume / Q000502:physiology
D000418:Albumins; D003287:Contrast Media; C099458:FS 069; D005466:Fluorocarbons; D011134:Polysaccharides; C059891:SHU 508