Radioactive contamination of bottom sediments in the upper reaches of the Techa river: analysis of the data obtained in 1950 and 1951.
A stationary sorption model has been developed for re-evaluating and analysing archive data from 1950-1951 on the radioactive contamination of Techa river bottom sediments close to the site of liquid radioactive waste discharge. In general, good agreement was obtained between calculations and measurements, which substantiates further the assumptions and conclusions in two preceding articles, on the radionuclide composition of discharged liquid radioactive waste. Estimates on the effective liquid radioactive waste discharges given here are significantly different from those deduced in the 1950s, i.e. in summer 1950 and October 1951. The results are discussed in relation to the Techa River Dosimetry System 2000 (TRDS-2000) that has recently been presented to serve as a means for estimating doses to the Techa river residents. Parameter values describing the exponential decrease of bottom sediment contamination along the river due to short-lived radionuclides, such as (106)Ru, and (144)Ce, agree reasonably with those used in TRDS-2000. However, for other radionuclides, such as (95)Zr, (95)Nb, (91)Y, (90)Sr and (137)Cs, substantial differences are found. It is demonstrated that water flow rate, width of the river, and surface area of bottom sediments are important parameters which were not adequately taken into account in TRDS-2000. Also, the stirring-up of contaminated bottom sediments and their subsequent transport by the water flow are seen to be an important mechanism that governs the radionuclide transport downstream. This mechanism was not included in the TRDS-2000 model. It is concluded that the sorption model used in TRDS-2000 for the reconstruction of radioactive contamination of water and bottom sediments of the Techa river in 1949-1951, is subject to considerable errors. While the present paper is focussed on details of the dosimetric modelling, the implications for the Techa river dosimetry are major. They will be further elucidated in a forthcoming paper.
Mayak Production Association, 456780 Ozyorsk, Russian Federation. envc@chel-65.chel.su
Yury G
YG
Mokrov
D000327:Adsorption; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011210:Power Plants; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011850:Radioactive Waste / Q000032:analysis*; D011868:Radioisotopes / Q000032:analysis* / Q000737:chemistry; D011874:Radiometry / Q000379:methods*; D012212:Rheology / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry*; D012426:Russia; D014872:Water Movements; D014875:Water Pollutants, Radioactive / Q000032:analysis*
D011850:Radioactive Waste; D011868:Radioisotopes; D014875:Water Pollutants, Radioactive