Proactive interference between cues trained with a common outcome in first-order Pavlovian conditioning.
The nature of interference between cues (X, A) trained apart with a common outcome (O; an unconditioned stimulus) was explored by assessing proactive interference in first-order Pavlovian conditioning (i.e., A-O, X-O, resulting in attenuated responding to X). Three lick-suppression studies were conducted with water-deprived rats. Posttraining extinction of the interfering cue (A) attenuated proactive interference (Experiment 1), which mirrors the observation that extinction of the competing cue can reduce competition between cues trained together (e.g., recovery from overshadowing). Proactive interference was also attenuated with manipulations known to attenuate interference between outcomes trained apart (e.g., counterconditioning), namely reminder cues (Experiment 2) and renewal (Experiment 3). The findings suggest that similar processes underlie interference between cues trained apart, between cues trained together, and between outcomes trained apart.
Amundson
Jeffrey C
JC
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA.
Escobar
Martha
M
Miller
Ralph R
RR
D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D003463:Cues; D005108:Extinction, Psychological; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley