Bivalency is costly: bivalent stimuli elicit cautious responding.
When performing tasks in alternation, substantial slowing occurs when the stimuli have features relevant to both tasks (i.e., when stimuli are bivalent as opposed to univalent). One possible source of this slowing, herein called a bivalency cost, is that encountering bivalent stimuli leads to a more cautious response style. To investigate this, we employed a paradigm that required performing three simple tasks, with bivalent stimuli occasionally encountered on one task. The results show that regardless of the feature overlap among the stimuli used for the different tasks, the introduction of bivalent stimuli slowed responding on all tasks and it was accompanied by a decrease in response errors. Overall, it appears that bivalent stimuli recruit a more cautious approach to task-switching performance.
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. twoodward@cortex.psych.ubc.ca
Todd S
TS
Woodward
Beat
B
Meier
Christine
C
Tipper
Peter
P
Graf
D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011589:Psychology, Experimental / Q000379:methods*; D011930:Reaction Time