Critical perspectives of animal agriculture: introduction.
The American Society of Animal Science has recently focused its attention on a variety of contentious issues in animal agriculture. This paper deals with critique, a philosophical approach to analyzing and understanding issues. This method has been employed by various contemporary philosophers. For example, feminist theorists have used this approach to critically analyze sexual harassment. Critique involves a critical analysis of the discourse (ideas or language) and practices that define the social reality in which we live. How we think about the world and how we behave in it determines how we humans interact with each other as well as with the rest of nature. This social structure is associated with power structures that benefit some individuals and harm others. In this paper, I demonstrate how critique can be used to better understand the social reality of animal agriculture. By analyzing certain popular texts in this field, I show that a "mechanical view of nature" is dominant in animal agriculture and argue that such a view contributes to a social reality that can be harmful to some humans and other animals. I conclude that various contentious issues can be better addressed when we engage in a critical analysis of this conceptual framework and base our analysis on the experiences of many different people, including those who have been harmed by our current system of animal agriculture.
Schillo
K K
KK
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546-0215, USA. kkschi1@uky.edu
D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology; D005010:Ethology; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy; D012106:Research