A six-week, parallel, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of the 0.5% timolol/2.0% MK-507 combination b.i.d. to the concomitant administration of 0.5% timolol b.i.d. and 2.0% MK-507 b.i.d.
This was a 6-week, parallel, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of the 0.5% timolol/2.0% MK-507 combination b.i.d. to the concomitant administration of 0.5% timolol b.i.d. and 2.0% MK-507 b.i.d. Patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma from 21 to 85 years of age were enrolled in this study. Each of them should have intraocular pressure (IOP) of 20 mmHg or more in the study eye after they completed the wash-out period. The patients enrolled were randomly assigned to either combination (0.5% timolol/2.0% MK-507 b.i.d. and placebo b.i.d.) or concomitant (0.5% timolol b.i.d. and 2.0% MK-507 b.i.d.) treatment. During the study, no systemic or topical medication affecting IOP other than test drugs were allowed. A total of 20 randomized patients were included in the intention-to-treat population for analysis of data. The ten were assigned to the combination treatment and others were assigned to the concomitant treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between the two study treatments in terms of gender distribution, average age, and average IOP at the trough and the peak before starting the test medications. Mean reduction of the IOP from baseline to the final visit at the trough was 5.04 mmHg in the combination treatment and was 2.73 mmHg in the concomitant treatment. Mean reduction of the IOP at the peak was 2.19 mmHg in the combination treatment and was 2.53 mmHg in the concomitant treatment. There were no statistically significant differences in the above analyses between the two treatments. Safety evaluation was carried out, and number of adverse events in each treatment group did not differ substantially. Ocular signs and symptoms were evaluated in each visit, and all of the between-treatment values were not different significantly, either. Laboratory tests were performed, and showed no significant differences between pre- and post-treatment periods. None of these was found to be clinically serious, either. We concluded that the 0.5% timolol/2.0% MK-507 combination b.i.d. is equivalent in the efficacy of lowering IOP as well as safety compared to the concomitant administration of 0.5% timolol b.i.d. and 2.0% MK-507 b.i.d. in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma.
Chen
Yuh-Fang
YF
Department of Ophthalmology, Taipei County San-Chung Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yang
Chang-Hao
CH
Hung
Por T
PT
D000328:Adult; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D005902:Glaucoma, Open-Angle / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007429:Intraocular Pressure / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009798:Ocular Hypertension / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000503:physiopathology; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013449:Sulfonamides / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013876:Thiophenes / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013999:Timolol / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects*
D013449:Sulfonamides; D013876:Thiophenes; D013999:Timolol; C062765:dorzolamide