Reasoning with premises that are not empirically true: evidence for the role of inhibition and retrieval.
Two studies examined conditional reasoning with false premises. In Study 1, 12- and 16-year-old adolescents made "if-then" inferences after producing an alternative antecedent for the major premise. Older participants made more errors on the simple modus ponens inference than did younger ones. Reasoning with a false premise reduced this effect. Study 2 examined the relation between performance on a negative priming task (S. P. Tipper, 1985) and reasoning with contrary-to-fact premises in 9- and 11-year-olds. Overall, there was a correlation between the relative effect of negative priming on reaction times and the number of knowledge-based responses to the reasoning problems. The results of these studies are consistent with the idea that reasoning with premises that are not true requires an interaction between information retrieval and inhibition.
Departement de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Michael
M
Simoneau
Henry
H
Markovits
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D011340:Problem Solving; D011897:Random Allocation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires