Evolutionary psychology from a developmental systems perspective: comment on Lickliter and Honeycutt (2003).
Although agreeing with R. Lickliter and H. Honeycutt (2003) that evolutionary psychology lacks and should adopt a coherent developmental model to explain how evolved mechanisms become expressed in phenotypes, it is argued that adhering to the principles of developmental systems theory, despite enhancing evolutionary psychology, would not change appreciably its basic focus. The concepts of innateness and modularity, what is inherited and what evolves, as well as the possible role of developmental plasticity in the evolution of human cognition are discussed. It is proposed that evolutionary psychology can incorporate the developmental systems perspective into its theorizing, with the end result being a science that more closely reflects human nature.
Bjorklund
David F
DF
Department of Psychology, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA. dbjorklund@fau.edu
D005075:Biological Evolution; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology