Entropy evaluation using the kinetic method: is it feasible?
The kinetic method is one of the most widely used experimental techniques for the measurement of thermochemical parameters by mass spectrometry. Recently it has been realized that it can also be used to determine reaction entropies, but the validity of this approach has not been established. This Perspective evaluates kinetic method plots in cases where there is a significant entropy difference between the competing fragmentation channels (i.e. between sample and reference compounds in the dissociating cluster ion). The concept underlying this study is to calculate mass spectra theoretically, based on known thermochemical parameters and as a function of experimental conditions. This can be done accurately using the RRKM-based MassKinetics software. The resulting mass spectra are then interpreted by the kinetic method, yielding DeltaH and DeltaS values. These values are, in turn, compared with the true values used to generate the calculated mass spectra. The results show that the reaction entropy difference between sample and reference has a very large influence on kinetic method plots. This should always be considered when studying energy-dependent mass spectra (using metastable ions or low- or high-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID)), even if only DeltaH is to be determined. Kinetic method plots are not strictly linear and this becomes a serious issue in the case of small molecules showing a large entropy effect. In such cases, results obtained at a low degree of excitation are more accurate. Energy and entropy effects can be evaluated in a relatively straightforward manner: first, the apparent Gibbs energy (DeltaG(app)) and effective temperature (T(eff)) are determined from kinetic method plots (intercept and slope, respectively), obtained from experiments using various degrees of excitation. Second, the resulting DeltaG(app) is plotted against T(eff), the slope yielding DeltaS while the intercept (extrapolation to zero temperature) yields DeltaH. This data evaluation yields more accurate results than alternative methods used in the literature. The resulting DeltaH values are fairly accurate, with errors, in most cases, <4 kJ mol(-1). On the other hand, DeltaS is systematically underestimated by 20-40%. Empirically scaling DeltaS values determined by the kinetic method by 1.35 results in a DeltaS value within 20% (or 10 J mol(-1) K(-1)) of the theoretical value.
Mass Spectrometry Department, Institute of Chemistry, Chemical Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pusztaszeri út 59-67, H-1025 Budapest, Hungary.
László
L
Drahos
Károly
K
Vékey