Reconsideration of contemporary U.S. drug policy.
In their recent book Drug War Heresies: Learning From Other Vices, Times, and Places (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), MacCoun and Reuter challenge the continuation of contemporary U.S. drug policy. Depenalization and legalization of illicit drugs are evaluated as alternatives to U.S. prohibition policy, with harm reduction (mitigation of social damages) as the criterion for guiding drug regime change. The appraisal encompasses an analysis of underlying philosophical and social mechanisms of current U.S. policy as well as drawing analogies from a comprehensive review of American vices and also Western European governmental interventions into illicit drug activities. What is apparent is that the evaluation and the available evidence entail substantial complexity and do not readily present unequivocal positions. The evaluation also strongly indicates that considerable difficulty would be encountered not only for the implementation of alternative regimes but also for the engagement in open political discussion of prohibition alternatives.
Solano
Paul L
PL
Health Services Policy Research Group, School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, Graham Hall, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA. Solano@udel.edu
D003416:Criminal Law; D004335:Drug and Narcotic Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D037141:Mandatory Programs; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000600:supply & distribution; D011640:Public Policy; D012945:Social Values; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000534:rehabilitation / Q000628:therapy*; D014481:United States