Surgical results and functional outcome after total anorectal reconstruction by double graciloplasty supported by external-source electrostimulation and/or implantable pulse generators: an 8-year experience.
OBJECTIVE
Surgical and functional results after abdominoperineal resection and total anorectal reconstruction by electrostimulated gracilis muscle transposition are still poorly documented. This study prospectively evaluated surgical and functional outcome over time in our patients.


METHODS
Twenty-three patients underwent abdominoperineal resection, coloperineal pullthrough, double graciloplasty, and loop abdominal stoma. Temporary external-source intermittent electrostimulation, biofeedback training, and selective delayed stimulator implantation to improve unsatisfactory results were carried out in the first 13 patients (1st series); thereafter (2nd series) the stimulator was implanted during graciloplasty. Surgical and oncological results were followed up in all patients. Functional results were evaluated in 16 patients who underwent abdominal stoma takedown, eight in each of the two series, by anomanometry (up to 1 year) and our own 0-20 scoring system (up to 8 years from initial surgery).


RESULTS
The rate of major and minor postoperative complications was 21.7% and 65%, respectively. Continuous electrostimulation proved effective on resting anal pressure. Early clinical assessments showed satisfactory functional results (considered as having a score < or =8) in all first-group patients, including five who had stimulator support, and in one-half of second-group patients. After impairment (at least 2 points) at 1 year in five patients, four of whom were from the first group, all functional results improved and became satisfactory from 5 years on (1st series) and from 4 years on (2nd series).


CONCLUSIONS
Despite marked morbidity the high rate of good results, which improved over time, suggests that total anorectal reconstruction is worth being performed as part of abdominoperineal resection in well-selected patients with a strong motivation to avoid a permanent colostomy.
Violi
Vincenzo
V
Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery Clinic, University of Parma Medical School, Via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy. vincenzo.violi@unipr.it
Boselli
Adamo S
AS
De Bernardinis
Massimo
M
Costi
Renato
R
Nervi
Giorgio
G
Bertelè
Anna
A
Franzè
Angelo
A
Roncoroni
Luigi
L
D000368:Aged; D001003:Anal Canal / Q000503:physiopathology; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D005242:Fecal Incontinence / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008365:Manometry; D008875:Middle Aged; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000637:transplantation*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D016896:Treatment Outcome