Comparison of outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery and conventional coronary artery bypass surgery.
OBJECTIVE
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [OPCAB] is preferred to conventional CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) for many specific subgroups, such as elderly patients and high-risk patients. Whether OPCAB should be the first choice of surgical procedure for a wider range of coronary artery disease patient subgroups remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical results of OPCAB and CPB in our hospital.


METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed the results for 404 patients who received OPCAB or CPB between March 2000 and December 2001. Surgical methods adopted were at the discretion of the attending surgeon. In addition, subgroups of patients were analyzed to assess whether or not OPCAB was more successful in patients with specific characteristics.


RESULTS
There were no significant differences in the demographic data between the 2 groups. The perioperative mortality rate was similar for the CPB and OPCAB groups (2.5% and 2.0%, respectively; p = 1.00.) OPCAB was superior with respect to inotropic use, postoperative bleeding amount, transfusion amount, and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay (p < 0.05 for all), and also had a lower incidence of re-entry due to bleeding (6.7% vs 13.6%, p = 0.04) and prolonged hospitalization > 30 days (1.5% vs 10.8%, p < 0.01). At 12 months' follow-up, the OPCAB group had a lower rate of mortality (1.5% vs 5.6%, p = 0.03) and a comparable rate of readmission for cardiac reasons (6.6% vs 9.6%, p = 0.28). The rate of poor in-hospital outcome was lower in the OPCAB than in the CPB group (3.0% vs 13.3%, p </= 0.01), while the percentage with poor results on follow-up was comparable between the 2 groups (7.1% vs 12.1%, p = 0.09). In addition, subgroups defined as: female, age > 65 years, age < 65 years, diabetes, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, end-stage renal disease, left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump use, and left-main disease had better in-hospital outcome in the OPCAB group compared with the CPB group, while no subgroups had worse in-hospital outcomes with OPCAB. The 12-month follow-up outcome was similar with the 2 techniques.


CONCLUSIONS
Use of OPCAB in CABG operation was associated with improved in-hospital outcome and similar follow-up outcome compared to CPB. No subgroup had a worse outcome with OPCAB.
Yu
Hsi-Yu
HY
Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University School of Medicine, Taipei.
Wu
I-Hui
IH
Chen
Yih-Sharng
YS
Chi
Nai-Hsin
NH
Hsu
Ron-Bin
RB
Tsai
Chang-Her
CH
Wang
Shoei-Shen
SS
Lin
Fang-Yue
FY
D000368:Aged; D001803:Blood Transfusion / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002316:Cardiotonic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019106:Postoperative Hemorrhage; D012189:Retrospective Studies
D002316:Cardiotonic Agents