Science, values, and common ground.
In this paper, I argue that there may be common ground shared by animal science and its critics insofar as animal scientists seek improvement in their field in four areas: the quality of their products, the quality of life for those who make their livelihood in food production, the fair treatment of human workers, and the humane treatment of animals. I also propose that there are fundamental differences between improvement motivated by profit and improvement motivated by ethical values. Positive moral change is sometimes revolutionary, although it is often a matter of promoting positive incremental changes and keeping one's attention on the effects of actions and attitudes. In conclusion, I suggest that in animal agriculture, positive change can be brought about by "getting closer" to the objects of scientific research, including nonhuman animals, by paying more attention to their welfare.
Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, USA. cuomocj@email.uc.edu
Chris
C
Cuomo
D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods*; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000941:ethics; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011788:Quality of Life