Rights of patients: comparative perspectives from five countries.
Recognition and articulation of patient rights are core issues in the medical jurisprudence of most nations. While the nature of rights in medical care may vary from country to country, reflecting the idiosyncrasies of domestic law and health delivery, there are commonalities in this area of law that cut across borders. This paper presents five case studies in the patient rights area from Malaysia, Ireland, South Africa, Indonesia and the United States, respectively. The case discussions range from ongoing and fundamental concerns over broad patient rights issues, such as access to health care and informed consent, to rights concerns of those suffering from HIV/AIDS, to a novel consideration over ethical and legal issues concerning ownership of infant organs. It is the hope of the authors that individually, and collectively, the cases will provide helpful insights into this core area of medical law.
Blum
John D
JD
Loyola University, Chicago, USA.
Talib
Norchaya
N
Carstens
Pieter
P
Nasser
Muhammad
M
Tomkin
David
D
McAuley
Adam
A
D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000628:therapy; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000628:therapy; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007214:Indonesia; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D007494:Ireland; D008296:Malaysia; D008297:Male; D033282:Parental Consent; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013019:South Africa; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States