Dose perturbation in the presence of metallic implants: treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo simulations.
An increasing number of patients receiving radiation therapy have metallic implants such as hip prostheses. Therefore, beams are normally set up to avoid irradiation through the implant; however, this cannot always be accomplished. In such situations, knowledge of the accuracy of the used treatment planning system (TPS) is required. Two algorithms, the pencil beam (PB) and the collapsed cone (CC), are implemented in the studied TPS. Comparisons are made with Monte Carlo simulations for 6 and 18 MV. The studied materials are steel, CoCrMo, Orthinox, TiAlV and Ti. Monte Carlo simulated depth dose curves and dose profiles are compared to CC and PB calculated data. The CC algorithm shows overall a better agreement with Monte Carlo than the PB algorithm. Thus, it is recommended to use the CC algorithm to get the most accurate dose calculation both for the planning target volume and for tissues adjacent to the implants when beams are set up to pass through implants.
Wieslander
Elinore
E
Radiation Physics, Lund University Hospital, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden. elinore.wieslander@skane.se
Knöös
Tommy
T
D000465:Algorithms; D002858:Chromium Alloys / Q000528:radiation effects; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008670:Metals / Q000528:radiation effects*; D008982:Molybdenum / Q000528:radiation effects; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D013232:Steel / Q000528:radiation effects; D014025:Titanium / Q000528:radiation effects
D002858:Chromium Alloys; D008670:Metals; D013232:Steel; D008982:Molybdenum; D014025:Titanium