Interviewing vulnerable old people: ethical and methodological implications of imagining our subjects.
It is sometimes argued that interview research with vulnerable social groups, such as frail, lonely, older people, has distinctive ethical and methodological requirements. The conventional one-off, professional interview is seen to be both inadequate as a method of data collection and inimical to the interest of research subjects. While ideologically persuasive, such a view is not derived from systematic analysis of actual interviews. In this article, I describe a research project on social isolation in which the conceptualization of elderly interviewees as "vulnerable subjects" had a number of critical but intended impacts on the course and outcomes of the research. I offer an empirically grounded analysis of the interview situation that suggests an alternative reading of the relationship between social representation of aging persons and the methods we use to study them.
Russell
C
C
School of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe NSW, Australia 1825. c.russell@cchs.usyd.edu.au
D000368:Aged / Q000523:psychology*; D001315:Australia; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology*; D012934:Social Isolation / Q000523:psychology*; D035862:Vulnerable Populations / Q000523:psychology