title: Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The extent to which patient-based outcomes can be used to evaluate and communicate the effect of new drugs and devices is a subject of much debate. Criteria for evaluating the scientific quality of data to support health-related quality of life (HRQL) and other patient-based labeling and promotional claims in the United States and Europe have been proposed by various scientists and organizations. Since March 2000, a working group composed of members of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL), the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR), the Pharmaceutical Manufacturer's Association Health Outcomes Committee (PhRMA-HOC), and the European Regulatory Issues on Quality of Life Assessment (ERIQA) met to discuss and coordinate the various recommendations by their respective groups and address the need to harmonize outcomes review criteria within and across United States and European regulatory agencies. Over time, the discussion expanded from HRQL outcomes to include any outcome based on data provided by the patient or patient proxy, that is, patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The working group therefore became known as the PRO Harmonization Group.
  
  
  METHODS
  Working with a member of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), four key issues requiring clarification were identified: how PROs are defined and put into operation for research purposes; the added value of PROs in the drug review and evaluation process; selected questions related to the PRO measurement and research methodology; and the interest and demand for PRO information by decision makers. On February 15, 2001, all members of the PRO Harmonization Group attended a meeting in Rockville, Maryland, to discuss these four issues further, and on February 16, 2001, a formal presentation was made to representatives from various departments and reviewing divisions of the FDA. These presentations are summarized in this report.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All participants agreed that PROs are important for understanding the impact of treatment on patient functioning and well-being. They also stressed the need to communicate PRO information to key decision makers, including regulatory agencies, clinicians, patients and their families, and payers. Finally, the meeting resulted in plans for continuing the dialogue on PRO measurement and interpretation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The February 16, 2001, meeting represented an important step in harmonizing efforts across various organizations and in opening a dialogue with the FDA around major issues related to methodologic standards for measuring and interpreting PROs in the drug evaluation process.
authors: MAPI Research Institute, Lyon, France. cacquadro@mapi.fr
authors: Catherine
authors: C
authors: Acquadro
authors: Rick
authors: R
authors: Berzon
authors: Dominique
authors: D
authors: Dubois
authors: Nancy Kline
authors: NK
authors: Leidy
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Marquis
authors: Dennis
authors: D
authors: Revicki
authors: Margaret
authors: M
authors: Rothman
mesh_terms: D026683:Advisory Committees; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D003142:Communication; D032921:Consensus; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D004341:Drug Evaluation; D004348:Drug Labeling; D004358:Drug Therapy; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011788:Quality of Life; D012650:Self Disclosure; D014481:United States; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration