title: Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma: improved compliance with a novel miniaturized pneumatic compression device.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices prevent lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) when used properly, but compliance remains an issue. Devices are frequently discontinued when patients are out of bed, and they are rarely used in emergency departments. Trauma patients are at high risk for LEDVT; however, IPCs are underused in this population because of compliance limitations. The hypothesis of this study was that a new miniaturized, portable, battery-powered pneumatic compression device improves compliance in trauma patients over that provided by a standard device.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a prospective trial in which trauma patients (mean age, 46 years; revised trauma score, 11.7) were randomized to DVT prophylaxis with a standard calf-length sequential IPC device (SCD group) or a miniaturized sequential device (continuous enhanced-circulation therapy [CECT] group). The CECT device can be battery-operated for up to 6 hours and worn during ambulation. Timers attached to the devices, which recorded the time each device was applied to the legs and functioning, were used to quantify compliance. For each subject in each location during hospitalization, compliance rates were determined by dividing the number of minutes the device was functioning by the total minutes in that location. Compliance rates for all subjects were averaged in each location: emergency department, operating room, intensive care unit, and nursing ward.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Total compliance rate in the CECT group was significantly higher than in the SCD group (77.7% vs. 58.9%, P =.004). Compliance in the emergency department and nursing ward were also significantly greater with the CECT device (P =.002 and P =.008 respectively).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Previous studies have demonstrated that reduced compliance with IPC devices results in a higher incidence of LEDVT. Given its ability to improve compliance, the CECT may provide superior DVT prevention compared with that provided by standard devices.
authors: Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, 77555-0541, USA.
authors: Maki
authors: M
authors: Murakami
authors: Tandace L
authors: TL
authors: McDill
authors: Lori
authors: L
authors: Cindrick-Pounds
authors: David B
authors: DB
authors: Loran
authors: Kenneth J
authors: KJ
authors: Woodside
authors: William J
authors: WJ
authors: Mileski
authors: Glenn C
authors: GC
authors: Hunter
authors: Lois A
authors: LA
authors: Killewich
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001458:Bandages; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010349:Patient Compliance; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011446:Prospective Studies; D020246:Venous Thrombosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000150:complications*