title: Scholarship, consensus and advocacy: a comment on Cameron.
abstract: While Cameron is right about the need for Christians to contribute more visibly to medical ethical debates, he is wrong in his analysis of bioethics. Marsha D.M. Fowler and Andrew Jameton find specific problems in several points of Cameron's argument, particularly where the Hippocratic Oath and patient autonomy are concerned.
authors: Azusa Pacific University, USA.
authors: M D M
authors: MD
authors: Fowler
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Jameton
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics; D002835:Christianity; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006625:Hippocratic Oath; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics