Ethical considerations in social psychological research: is the bogus pipeline a special case?
The ethics of using deception in research are discussed, and Aguinis and Handelsman's (1997) arguments that research using the bogus pipeline (BPL), in particular, is unethical are reviewed and critiqued. Stances that view any deception research as unethical may be reasonable, and lead to the conclusion that BPL research is unethical. However, if the position taken is that deception research may be ethically acceptable, then there is not basis for concluding that BPL research is intrinsically unethical. The same considerations that are taken into account when deciding whether any deception in research is ethical apply to decisions about the ethical appropriateness of using the BPL.
Sigall
H
H
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. sigall@bss3.umd.edu
D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods*; D026686:Beneficence; D008192:Deception; D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D011593:Psychology, Social / Q000941:ethics; D012107:Research Design; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000523:psychology