title: [How to present in a unique fashion the oncologic and functional results after radical prostatectomy].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The results of radical prostatectomy (cancer control, continence and sexual potency) are currently presented separately, while the success of this surgery depends on a combination of good cancer control with maintenance of continence and erections. We propose a score to jointly evaluate and report cancer control and functional results.
  
  
  METHODS
  The results of 205 radical prostatectomies were studied at one year. Cancer control was evaluated by PSA and continence and sexual potency were evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire. Each patient was attributed 0 or 4 points according to the presence or absence of biochemical progression (PSA > 0.2 ng/ml), 0 or 2 points according to the presence or absence of urinary incontinence (use of pads) and 0 or 1 point according to the presence or absence of impotence (no erections). The sum of these points provided a socre classifying the patient into 8 distinct categories, from 0 to 7, each corresponding to a specific status (from 0 (0 + 0 + 0): no cancer control-incontinence-impotence to 7 (4 + 2 + 1): cancer control-continence-sexual potency).
  
  
  RESULTS
  One year after the operation, 175 (85%) of patients had a PSA less than 0.2 ng/ml, 135 (65.8%) were continent and 64 (32.7%) reported erections. All patients with a score > or = 4 had good cancer control, wit no functional disorders for a score of 7 (4 + 2 + 1) (92%), no disorders of continence for a score of 6 (4 + 2 + 1) (31.5%), no disorders of erection for a score of 5 (4 + 0 + 1) (8.3%), or with incontinence and impotence for a score of 4 (4 + 0 + 0) (21.9%). All patients with a score < 4 had a PSA > 0.2 ng/ml, but with no functional disorders for a score for 3 (0 + 2 + 1) (2.4%), no incontinence for a score of 2 (0 + 2 + 0) (8.3%), and no impotence for a score of 1 (0 + 0 + 1) (1.9%). 1.9% of patients were incontinent, impotent and showed signs of biochemical progression (socre 0 = 0 + 0 + 0).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This score allows analysis of the global (cancer control and functional) results of radical prostatectomy and would facilitate comparisons between various surgical techniques (type of approach, nerve-sparing techniques) and various centres.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Urologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, EMI 03-37, 51, avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil. laurent.salomon@hmn.ap-hop-paris.fr
authors.forename: Laurent
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Salomon
authors.forename: Fabien
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Saint
authors.forename: Aristotelis G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Anastasiadis
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sebe
authors.forename: Dominique
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Chopin
authors.forename: Clément-Claude
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Abbou
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D007172:Erectile Dysfunction / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology