title: Efficacy of sharing oocytes from compensated donors between two recipients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To see if sharing of donated oocytes from a compensated donor lowers outcome following embryo transfer compared to recipients keeping all oocytes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective review. Recipients have the option of keeping all oocytes or sharing to reduce costs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were equal clinical, and ongoing/delivered pregnancy rates and implantation rates in the two groups. There were almost twice as many frozen embryos available to recipients who did not share for potential future use.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sharing of oocytes between two recipients reduces the financial burden for the recipient without affecting efficacy. Such a policy would make more oocytes available to recipients and thus shorten the long waiting times.
authors.affiliation: The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, NJ, USA.
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Check
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Fox
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Deperro
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Krotec
mesh_terms: D017046:Cost Savings; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D010064:Embryo Implantation; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D018587:Oocyte Donation / Q000191:economics* / Q000941:ethics; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D014481:United States