title: The practice setting: site of ethical conflict for some mothers and midwives.
abstract: Practitioners' ethical orientation and responses vary between practice settings. Yet, currently, the ethics for midwifery practice that is explicit in the literature and which provides the ideals of socialization into practice, is that of bio(medical)ethics. Traditional bioethics, developed because of World War II atrocities and increased scientific research, is based on moral philosophy, normative theory, abstract universal principles and objective problem solving, all of which focus on right and wrong 'action' for resolving dilemmas. They exclude context and relationship. Personal narratives of mothers and midwives contest the appropriateness of these accepted values and systems for childbirth because they induce conflict between workplace/service provider ethics and personal/professional midwifery ethics. In contrast to the disembedded and disembodied approach of biomedical ethics, an ethically adequate response in midwifery practice resonates more with the ethics of intimates, such as feminist virtue ethics.
authors.affiliation: University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia. thompsof@gil.com.au
authors.forename: Faye E
authors.initials: FE
authors.lastname: Thompson
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D004645:Empathy; D004991:Ethics, Institutional; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology*; D033262:Narration; D009721:Nurse Midwives / Q000941:ethics* / Q000523:psychology*; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000941:ethics / Q000523:psychology; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011361:Professional Competence; D011793:Queensland; D012945:Social Values; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D028722:Virtues; D017132:Workplace / Q000523:psychology*