title: Sexual conflict and indirect benefits.
abstract: Recent work on sexual selection and sexual conflict has explored the influence of indirect effects on the evolution of female mating behaviour. It has been suggested that the importance of these effects has been underestimated and that the influence of indirect effects may actually be of relatively greater significance than direct effects. Additionally, it has also been suggested that all indirect effects, both good genes and sexy son, are qualitatively equivalent. Here a counterpoint to these suggestions is offered. We argue two main points: (1) it is unlikely that indirect effects will commonly outweigh direct effects, and (2) that there are important differences between good genes and sexy son indirect effects that must be recognized. We suggest that acknowledgement of these distinctions will lead to increased understanding of processes operating in both sexual conflict and sexual selection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. camerone@biology.queensu.ca
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Cameron
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Day
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rowes
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal