title: Weighing health benefit and health risk information when consuming sport-caught fish.
abstract: Fish consumers may incur benefits and risks from eating fish. Health advisories issued by states, tribes, and other entities typically include advice about how to limit fish consumption or change other behaviors (e.g., fish cleaning or cooking) to reduce health risks from exposure to contaminants. Eating fish, however, may provide health benefits. Risk communicators and fish consumers have suggested the importance of including risk comparison information, as well as health risk-benefit comparisons in health advisory communications. To improve understanding about how anglers fishing in waters affected by health advisories may respond to such risk-risk or risk-benefit information, we surveyed Lake Ontario (NY, USA) anglers. We interviewed by telephone 4,750 anglers, 2,593 of which had fished Lake Ontario in the past 12 months and were sent a detailed mail questionnaire (1,245 responded). We posed questions varying the magnitude of health risks and health benefits to be gained by fish consumption, and varied the population affected by these risks and benefits (anglers, children, women of childbearing age, and unborn children). Respondents were influenced by health benefit and health risk information. When risks were high, most respondents would eat less fish regardless of the benefit level. When risks were low, the magnitude of change in fish consumption was related to level of benefit. Responses differed depending on the question wording order, that is, whether "risks" were posed before "benefits." For a given risk-benefit level, respondents would give different advice to women of childbearing age versus children, with more conservative advice (eat less fish) provided to women of childbearing age. Respondents appeared to be influenced more strongly by risk-risk comparisons (e.g., risks from other foods vs. risks from fish) than by risk-benefit comparisons (e.g., risks from fish vs. benefits from fish). Risk analysts and risk communicators should improve efforts to include risk-risk and risk-benefit comparisons in communication efforts, and to clarify to whom the health risks and benefits from fish consumption may accrue.
authors.affiliation: Department of Natual Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. bak3@cornell.edu
authors.forename: Barbara A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Knuth
authors.forename: Nancy
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: A  Connelly
authors.forename: Judy
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sheeshka
authors.forename: Jacqueline
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Patterson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002648:Child; D003142:Communication; D005260:Female; D005399:Fishes; D005506:Food Contamination; D005618:Fresh Water; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009518:New York; D010465:Perception; D011247:Pregnancy; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012309:Risk-Taking; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires