Extending the theory of realistic conflict to competition in institutional settings: intergroup status and outcome.
The authors analyzed the extent to which the Theory of Realistic Conflict can be extended to institutional settings in which groups are not actively involved in decisions but are passive targets of decisions taken by an institutional authority (the rector). A negative interdependence between the in-group (psychology) and a high- or low-status outgroup (engineering versus nursing) was established by an institutional authority (the rector). The competition (induced by the rector) was beneficial (an increase in the budget previously invested in the faculty) or detrimental (a decrease in the budget) for the in-group. The results confirmed that competition affects mutual attitudes, images, and behaviors of groups even if the groups are passive targets of decisions that the institutional authority makes. Moreover, competition--regardless of whether beneficial or detrimental--deteriorated images of and attitudes toward high-status out-groups. In contrast, competition improved images and opinions about low-status out-groups, but only in the loss condition.
Echebarria-Echabe
Agustin
A
Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, The University of the Basque Country, San Sebastian, Spain. pspeteta@ss.ehu.es
Guede
Emilia Fernández
EF
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002017:Budgets; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011588:Psychology, Educational / Q000193:education; D012930:Social Dominance; D013030:Spain; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology*; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014495:Universities