title: Leaf ontogeny influences leaf phenolics and the efficacy of genetically expressed Bacillus thuringiensis cry1A(a) d-endotoxin in hybrid poplar against gypsy moth.
abstract: We tested the hypothesis that ontogenetic variation in leaf chemistry could affect the efficacy of genetically expressed Bacillus thuringiensis cry1A(a) d-endotoxin, and thus provide spatial variation in (1) foliage protection and (2) selective pressures that could delay the resistance of folivores. Our model consisted of clonal hybrid Populus plants (NC5339). Consumption of foliage and relative growth rates of gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) increased, and phenolic glycoside concentrations decreased, as leaves from transformed plants containing the cry1A(a) d-endotoxin and nontransformed plants matured from leaf plastochron index (LPI) 1-6. Feeding and growth rates were negatively correlated with phenolic glycosides in both transformed and nontransformed foliage. The presence of the B. thuringiensis d-endotoxin was at most, additive to the effect of the phenolic glycosides. Feeding and growth rates were positively correlated with condensed tannins in transformed foliage, but there was no relationship with condensed tannins in nontransformed foliage. The results indicate that the presence of foliar allelochemicals of poplar can enhance the effectiveness of genetically expressed B. thuringiensis d-endotoxin against gypsy moth larvae. However, the spatial variation in gypsy moth performance in response to the combination of foliar allelochemicals and d-endotoxin was not greater than the effect of ontogenetic variation in foliar allelochemicals alone. These results suggest that for this important pest, foliage protection may be obtained without genetically engineered defenses, and instead, by relying on ontogenetic and clonal variation in allelochemicals. The benefits of combining novel resistance mechanisms with natural ones will depend upon the specific folivore's adaptation to natural resistance mechanisms, such as allelochemicals. Moreover, some of the greatest benefits from transgenic resistance may arise from the need to protect trees from multiple pests, some of which may not be deterred by, or may even prefer, allelochemicals that confer protection from a few species.
authors.affiliation: Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. kkleiner@ycp.edu
authors.forename: Karl W
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Kleiner
authors.forename: David D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Ellis
authors.forename: Brent H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: McCown
authors.forename: Kenneth F
authors.initials: KF
authors.lastname: Raffa
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001413:Bacillus thuringiensis / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D004731:Endotoxins / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005786:Gene Expression Regulation; D009036:Moths / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D010636:Phenols / Q000494:pharmacology*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000737:chemistry / Q000254:growth & development; D032107:Populus / Q000737:chemistry*; D013634:Tannins / Q000494:pharmacology
chemical_list: D004731:Endotoxins; D010636:Phenols; D013634:Tannins