The disavowed curriculum: understanding student's reasoning in professionally challenging situations.
BACKGROUND
Understanding students' perceptions of and responses to lapses in professionalism is important to shaping students' professional development.


OBJECTIVE
Utilize realistic, standardized professional dilemmas to obtain insight into students' reasoning and motivations in "real time."


METHODS
Qualitative study using 5 videotaped scenarios (each depicting a student placed in a situation which requires action in response to a professional dilemma) and individual interviews, in which students were questioned about what they would do next and why.


METHODS
University of Toronto.


METHODS
Eighteen fourth-year medical students; participation voluntary and anonymous.


METHODS
A model to explain students' reasoning in the face of professional dilemmas.


RESULTS
Grounded theory analysis of interview transcripts revealed that students were motivated to consider specific actions by referencing a Principle (an abstract or idealized concept), an Affect (a feeling or emotion), or an Implication (a potential consequence of suggested actions). Principles were classified as "avowed" as ideals of our profession (e.g., honesty or disclosure), or "unavowed" (unacknowledged or undeclared, e.g., obedience or allegiance). Implications could also be avowed (e.g., concerning patients) or unavowed (e.g., concerning others); but students were predominantly motivated by considering "disavowed" implications: those pertaining to themselves (e.g., concern for grades, evaluations, or reputation), which are actively denied by the profession and discouraged as being inconsistent with altruism.


CONCLUSIONS
This "disavowed curriculum" has implications for education, feedback, and evaluation. Instead of denying their existence, we should teach students how to negotiate and balance these unavowed and disavowed implications and principles, in order to help them develop their own professional stance.
Ginsburg
Shiphra
S
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Center for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. shiphra.ginsburg@utoronto.ca
Regehr
Glenn
G
Lingard
Lorelei
L
D002983:Clinical Competence; D003479:Curriculum; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009042:Motivation; D011340:Problem Solving; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology*; D014743:Videotape Recording