Prenatal diagnosis--discrimination, deliverance or democracy?
Prenatal diagnosis utilizes invasive procedures such as amniocentesis, chorionic villus sampling, cord blood sampling and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. These techniques can diagnose serious foetal illnesses and this therefore provides valuable information to couples, helping them to prepare for the birth of an affected child. It also affords women the freedom to decide whether to terminate a pregnancy. The selective termination of foetuses with serious disabilities does not represent disability discrimination because women and parents are actually rejecting the disability, rather than the foetus itself. More significantly, the choice to abort a foetus with a serious illness or disability is an intensely private and personal exercise that does not and cannot be reflective of a wider public morality. Exactly the same can be said of the choice to selectively abort foetuses based solely on their sex. The private choice of women in this respect does not amount to the social devaluation of women. Firstly, it is an erroneous assumption that women in Australia prefer male babies. Secondly, even if there is a preference for male babies, banning prenatal sex selection would be treating just one of many symptoms of sexism, rather than curing the primary causes. The moral right of all women to reproductive freedom is an embodiment of their equal value in society.
Bradfield
Owen
O
Monash University, Australia
D000025:Abortion, Eugenic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D001315:Australia; D006233:Persons with Disabilities; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus / Q000002:abnormalities; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D019836:Preimplantation Diagnosis; D011287:Prejudice; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000379:methods; D049188:Prenatal Injuries; D019849:Sex Determination Processes; D012743:Sex Preselection / Q000941:ethics