Challenges with nonfiber carbohydrate methods.
Nonfiber carbohydrates (NFC) encompass a compositionally and nutritionally diverse group exclusive of those carbohydrates found in NDF. Their content in feeds has often been described as a single value estimated by difference as 100% of dry matter minus the percentages of CP, NDF (adjusted for CP in NDF), ether extract, and ash. A calculated value was used because of difficulties with assays for individual NFC, but it does not differentiate among nutritionally distinct NFC. Errors in NFC estimation can arise from not accounting for CP in NDF and when multipliers other than 6.25 are appropriate to estimate CP. Analyses that begin to distinguish among NFC are those for starch, soluble fiber (non-NDF, nonstarch polysaccharides), and low molecular weight carbohydrates (mono- and oligosaccharides). Many starch analyses quantify alpha-glucans through specific hydrolysis of alpha-(1 --> 4) and alpha-(1 --> 6) linkages in the glucan, and measurement of released glucose. Incomplete gelatinization and hydrolysis will lead to underestimation of starch content. Starch values are inflated by enzyme preparations that hydrolyze carbohydrates other than alpha-glucan, measurement of all released monosaccharides without specificity for glucose, and failure to exclude free glucose present in the unhydrolyzed sample. Soluble fiber analyses err in a fashion similar to NFC if estimation of CP requires multipliers other than 6.25, or if contaminants such as CP and starch have not been properly accounted. Depolymerization and incomplete precipitation can also decrease soluble fiber estimates. The low molecular weight carbohydrates have been defined as carbohydrates soluble in 78 to 80% ethanol, which separates them from polysaccharides. They can be measured in extracts using broad-spectrum colorimetric assays (phenol-sulfuric acid assay or reducing sugar analysis of acid hydrolyzed samples) or chromatographic methods. Limitations of the colorimetric assays include lack of differentiation among mono- and oligosaccharides and differences in efficacy of measuring total carbohydrate. More sensitive and precise chromatographic methods require expensive equipment and specialized expertise. Current methods for NFC can separate nutritionally relevant fractions, but questions remain as to which fractions merit analysis and what analyses to use. These issues must be resolved in order to soundly evaluate and explore the roles of carbohydrates in diets.
Hall
M B
MB
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-0910, USA. hall@animal.ufl.edu
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D002623:Chemistry Techniques, Analytical / Q000379:methods*; D003124:Colorimetry / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates / Q000032:analysis*; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000032:analysis; D006868:Hydrolysis; D008970:Molecular Weight; D009753:Nutritive Value; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012995:Solubility; D013213:Starch / Q000032:analysis
D004040:Dietary Carbohydrates; D004043:Dietary Fiber; D013213:Starch