Histological, morphological, profilometric and optical changes of human tooth enamel after microabrasion.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the loss of enamel after a single 20-secondsapplication of a microabrasion slurry and to evaluate structural changes by means of laser fluorescence, and microscopic and optical measurements.


METHODS
Defined buccal areas with a diameter of 2 mm from 16 extracted human molars were demineralized for 12 weeks using a demineralization gel (pH 4.8). The created artificial white-spot lesions were divided corono-apically in control and test sites, using a rubber cement that prospectively covered the untreated control site. Teeth were divided into two groups of eight teeth each. One group was treated with an abrasive cleaning paste (Pell-ex) and the other group with a commercially available microabrasion slurry (Opalustre) for 20 seconds, applying a load of 200 g. Before and after treatment, standardized photographs were taken for the determination of luminescence and profilometric tracings of the surface, and these were recorded for the determination of enamel loss. The grade of demineralization was quantified using a laser fluorescence method (Diagnodent). Statistical differences were checked using a Mann Whitney and student t-test. Replicas of the treated areas were made for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, and teeth were histologically investigated by polarized light microscopy.


RESULTS
Loss of tooth substance was significantly higher (P < or = 0.001) for the microabrasion group (134.8 +/- 35.5 microm) compared with the abrasive cleaning paste group (4.5 +/- 1.2 microm). After treatment, statistically significant differences in fluorescence and luminescence measurements could only be detected for microabraded teeth. No significant changes were noted for teeth treated with an abrasive cleaning paste. Histological findings confirmed removal of the demineralized surface zone when microabrading the enamel, whereas no changes were observed in the test group treated with an abrasive cleaning paste. Polarized light microscopy did not indicate any changes in the mineralization pattern, for example compaction, in the treated subsurface zone.
Schmidlin
Patrick Roger
PR
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Dental Institute, Zurich University, Plattenstrasse 11, 8028 Zurich, Switzerland. patrick.schmidlin@zzmk.unizh.ch
Göhring
Till Nicolaus
TN
Schug
Jens
J
Lutz
Felix
F
D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000473:pathology*; D019243:Enamel Microabrasion / Q000379:methods*; D005453:Fluorescence; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007834:Lasers; D008163:Luminescent Measurements; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D008859:Microscopy, Polarization; D055095:Optics and Photonics; D023861:Photography, Dental; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013997:Time Factors; D014072:Tooth Abrasion / Q000473:pathology; D017001:Tooth Demineralization / Q000473:pathology; D014100:Toothpastes
D014100:Toothpastes