Could laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery become the standard of care? A review and experience with 750 procedures.
BACKGROUND
The benefits of the laparoscopic approach to colon and rectal surgery do not seem as great as for other laparoscopic procedures. To study this further we decided to review the current literature and the 10-year experience of a surgical group from university teaching hospitals in Montréal, Québec and Toronto in performing laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery.


METHODS
The prospectively designed case series comprised all patients having laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery. The procedures were carried out by a group of 4 surgeons between April 1991 and November 2001. We noted intraoperative complications, any conversions to open surgery, operating time, postoperative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay.


RESULTS
The group attempted 750 laparoscopic colon and rectal procedures of which 669 were completed laparoscopically. Malignant disease was the indication for surgery in 49.6% of cases. Right hemicolectomy and sigmoid colectomy accounted for 54.5% of procedures performed. Intraoperative complications occurred in 8.3%, with 29.0% of these resulting in conversion to open surgery. The overall rate of conversion to open surgery was 10.8%, most commonly for oncologic concerns. Median operating time was 175 minutes for all procedures. Postoperative complications occurred in 27.5% of procedures completed laparoscopically but were mostly minor wound complications. Pulmonary complications occurred in only 1.0%. The anastomotic leak rate was 2.5%. The early reoperation rate was 2.4%. Postoperative mortality was 2.2%. No port site metastases have yet been detected. The median postoperative length of stay was 5 days.


CONCLUSIONS
The clinical outcomes of laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery in this 10-year experience are consistent with numerous cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. Laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery in the hands of well-trained surgeons can be performed safely with short hospital stay, low analgesic requirements and acceptable complication rates compared with historical controls and other reports in the literature. Evidence from published randomized clinical trials is emerging that under these conditions laparoscopic resection represents the better treatment option for most benign conditions, but concerns regarding its appropriateness for malignant disease are still to be resolved.
Schlachta
Christopher M
CM
Division of General Surgery, Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont. christopher.schlachta@utoronto.ca
Mamazza
Joseph
J
Gregoire
Roger
R
Burpee
Stephen E
SE
Poulin
Eric C
EC
D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards; D003082:Colectomy / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D039021:Colonic Pouches / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003113:Colonoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003125:Colostomy / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006785:Hospitals, University; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009864:Ontario / Q000453:epidemiology; D018579:Patient Selection; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011351:Proctoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011792:Quebec / Q000453:epidemiology; D012086:Reoperation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012449:Safety; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome