Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.
Enacting action phrases in subject-performed tasks (SPTs) leads to better free recall than hearing or reading the same materials in verbal tasks (VTs). This enactment effect is usually explained by better item-specific information in SPTs than in VTs. The role of relational information is controversial. In the present paper, we will take the multiple recall approach to study the role of item and relational information in memory for actions by computing the number of item gains and the number of item losses over trials. This approach has previously been applied to lists of unrelated action phrases. We applied it to categorically related lists, also allowing a measure of relational information by clustering scores. It was found that SPTs produced more item gains than VTs. This finding confirmed the assumption that SPTs provide better item-specific information than VTs. The number of item losses did not differ between VTs and SPTs. This finding suggests that relational information is equally provided by VTs and SPTs. However, the organizational scores showed a more differentiated picture. Clustering was greater in SPTs than in VTs with randomly presented lists, but not with blocked lists. We suggested that these results, as well as other findings from the literature, could be explained by distinguishing automatic and strategic processes and the types of item associations that are addressed by these processes.
Engelkamp
Johannes
J
FR Psychologie, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany. engelkamp@rz.uni-sb.de
Seiler
Kerstin H
KH
Zimmer
Hubert D
HD
D001288:Attention; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011932:Reading