The utility of psychological testing in assessing emotional damages in personal injury litigation.
Psychological testing and assessment instruments frequently play a small but important role when psychologists assist the courts as emotional damage experts in personal injury matters. However, examiners frequently, if sometimes inadvertently, mislead the court with test interpretations that are based on clinical rather than forensic populations and that fail to appreciate the lack of robustness of clinical measures in this forensic context. Whereas published computerized interpretations repeatedly remind experts that personality test results should only be used as a method to generate hypotheses about the examinee that are to be subjected to further investigation and consideration, experts all too often inform the courts of test interpretations as if the test results were measures of clinical constructs rather than plaintiffs' self-reports of symptoms.
Greenberg
Stuart A
SA
University of Washington, USA.
Otto
Randy K
RK
Long
Anna C
AC
D005104:Expert Testimony; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007406:Interview, Psychological; D007603:Jurisprudence; D010552:Personality Assessment; D011581:Psychological Tests; D011594:Psychometrics; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000523:psychology*