title: Food safety: risk assessment methodology and decision-making criteria.
abstract: As our scientific technology grows, risk assessment methods become more complex and, therefore, open to greater scientific debate. Risk assessment has always been a part of the regulatory notification and approval process for foods. However, the methodologies applied to risk assessment and decision-making have become diverse, dependent on a number of features, including the areas of the world in which one operates, the need to use cumulative risk assessment for pesticides and other ingredients or alternative risk assessment considerations for evaluating nontraditional or bioengineered foods. Diverse institutional structures within a single federal regulatory authority may tend to lead to diversity in risk outcomes that creates policy decisions that complicate and confuse the risk management process. On top of this challenge, decisions become more complicated by the need to examine beneficial factors of foods rather than the adverse effects of foods and food additives. Foods are a complex mixture of ingredients. Regulatory groups recognize the need to use new approaches for evaluating the safety and risks associated with foods and food additives, and to do so in a timely manner. The United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in its need to ensure standards of "reasonable certainty of no harm" continues to explore alternative means to be responsive to petitioners as well as continue to examine scientifically validated means, e.g., quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), and computer-assisted programs, within the approval process to assist in the evaluation of risks. Another means to improve the risk management process would include the cumulative risk assessment of pesticides that will, no doubt, be the beginning of more intensive efforts to understand cumulative exposures and the inherent risks from multiple pathways of exposure. The passage of the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) resulted in developing additional risk assessment methodologies and approaches to assess the potential for multiple exposures and risks. Addressing the international criteria used in decision-making related to foods safety assessment has resulted in acceptable intake values for food ingredients for carcinogens and noncarcinogens that, in general, tend to be more stringent in the United States compared to Europe. Clearly, the need for harmonization of risk assessment criteria and the impact of the decision process on regulatory approvals and safety assessment is a future need for the continued assurances of food safety. The topics presented in this paper are based on a symposium held in November 2002 at the annual meeting of the American College of Toxicology.
authors.affiliation: ENVIRON Health Sciences Institute, Arlington, Virginia 22203, USA. wbrock@environcorp.com
authors.forename: William J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Brock
authors.forename: Joseph V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Rodricks
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rulis
authors.forename: Vicki L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Dellarco
authors.forename: George M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Gray
authors.forename: Richard W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Lane
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003657:Decision Making; D005502:Food / Q000592:standards*; D005506:Food Contamination / Q000032:analysis* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States; D014486:United States Food and Drug Administration