To lift or recut: changing trends in LASIK enhancement.
OBJECTIVE
To report serious complications caused by recutting laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps for enhancement and reconsider the current preferred method of LASIK enhancement.


METHODS
Multiple surgeon practices.


METHODS
This retrospective noncomparative nonconsecutive case series comprised LASIK patients in the private practices of 9 experienced refractive surgeons and those reported in a survey of refractive surgeons. Case histories, refractions, corneal topographies, slitlamp photographs, and measurements of uncorrected and best corrected (BCVA) visual acuity after recutting LASIK flaps were collected. Surveys of refractive surgeons and an analysis of changing practice trends among the authors and these surgeons were assessed.


RESULTS
In 12 cases, significant loss of BCVA and subjective visual difficulties resulted from recutting LASIK flaps. Most surveyed surgeons had changed their practice from recutting to lifting flaps even 9 to 10 years postoperatively with good results.


CONCLUSIONS
Recutting flaps for enhancement should be avoided unless other alternatives are unavailable.
Rubinfeld
Roy S
RS
Washington Eye Physicians and Surgeons, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA.
Hardten
David R
DR
Donnenfeld
Eric D
ED
Stein
Raymond M
RM
Koch
Douglas D
DD
Speaker
Mark G
MG
Frucht-Pery
Joseph
J
Kameen
Anthony J
AJ
Negvesky
Gerald J
GJ
D000328:Adult; D003319:Corneal Stroma / Q000601:surgery*; D019781:Corneal Topography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D020731:Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000639:trends*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009216:Myopia / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013524:Surgical Flaps; D014786:Vision Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D014792:Visual Acuity