title: Radically different treatment recommendations for newly diagnosed neuroblastoma: pitfalls in assessment of risk.
abstract: Neuroblastoma risk stratification is based on stage, age, and biology and prescribes surgery for low-risk disease, moderate-dose chemotherapy for intermediate-risk disease, and maximal therapy (including myeloablative treatment with stem cell transplantation) for high-risk disease. Four cases are described that depict pitfalls in risk assessment with potentially far-reaching consequences. This report focuses on a subset of four patients referred for second opinions. Stage was defined by the International Neuroblastoma Staging System. The first recommendations were for maximal therapy, but second opinions were radically different (ie, surgery alone). Ages at diagnosis were 15 to 25 months. Shimada histopathology was unfavorable in three of the four patients, but chromosomal, serum, and urine prognostic markers were favorable. All four patients did well without cytotoxic therapy (follow-up: 2 years 10 months plus to 4 years 8 months plus). Patient 1 had abdominal and upper thoracic/supraclavicular masses (stage 4); the former was resected and the latter spontaneously regressed. Patient 2 had retroperitoneal disease, without bone marrow involvement, but imaging studies showed lesions in vertebral bodies. Biopsies of the latter showed no neuroblastoma and the primary tumor (with regional lymph nodes) was resected, changing stage from 4 to 2B. Patient 3 had a retroperitoneal mass but no distant disease. Though initially deemed to be unresectable, the abdominal tumor was excised, changing the classification from high risk (stage 3 with unfavorable histopathology) to low risk (stage 1). Patient 4 had a pelvic mass, with unfavorable histopathology, and bilateral inguinal lymph node involvement (stage 3); all soft tissue disease was resected. The absence of cortical bone and extensive bone marrow metastatic involvement in a young neuroblastoma patient should cause a shift in attention to biologic prognostic markers. Some patients classified as having high-risk neuroblastoma might actually do well with no cytotoxic therapy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. kushnerb@mskcc.org
authors.forename: Brian H
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Kushner
authors.forename: Michael P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: LaQuaglia
authors.forename: Kim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kramer
authors.forename: Nai-Kong V
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Cheung
mesh_terms: D015415:Biomarkers / Q000032:analysis; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging; D005260:Female; D006287:Health Planning Guidelines; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D009447:Neuroblastoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery* / Q000628:therapy; D018570:Risk Assessment; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers