Murder, extramarital affairs, and the issue of probative value.
A paper previously published in Law and Human Behavior by D. Davis and W. C. Follette (2002) argued that certain "profiling" characteristics commonly admitted into court have little or no probative value. They argued that this is especially likely to be true when the characteristic used as evidence (e.g., having an extramarital affair) is rather common in the population whereas the act in question (e.g., a man murdering his wife) is rare. Their analysis has prompted a strong response by Friedman and Park and by Kaye and Koehler with a rejoinder by Davis and Follette (all three follow this paper in this issue of Law and Human Behavior). This paper describes some of the nature of this controversy.
Wells
Gary L
GL
Psychology Department, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA. glwells@iastate.edu
D003657:Decision Making; D005114:Extramarital Relations; D005260:Female; D006708:Homicide / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011336:Probability; D018454:Spouses; D013240:Stereotyping; D014481:United States