Dialysis without membranes: how and why?
Dialysis between two flowing, miscible fluids without an intervening membrane enhances both the transport rate and biocompatibility. Unfortunately, it also presents serious challenges, including the loss of pressure as a driving force for volume transport, the need for sterile dialysate in greater quantity than in conventional dialysis, the possibility of unacceptable protein loss, and even the possibility of blood cell loss. This paper quantifies these advantages and disadvantages, and evaluate the means by which the latter might be surmounted. Preliminary data are provided to show that stable flows of one fluid sheathing another, miscible fluid are achievable and that molecular exchange between the fluids is orderly and in qualitative agreement with the theory. Extension of the concept to other blood purification tasks, especially in the treatment of liver failure and various macromolecular separations, is also discussed. In conclusion, membraneless separations will require a secondary process and a recycle stream. Under these conditions, its advantages can be preserved and its disadvantages controlled.
Leonard
Edward F
EF
Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
West
Alan C
AC
Shapley
Nina C
NC
Larsen
Mona U
MU
D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000009:adverse effects; D001834:Body Water; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D008970:Molecular Weight; D009995:Osmosis; D016062:Porosity; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D012212:Rheology; D013499:Surface Properties; D013997:Time Factors
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D008567:Membranes, Artificial