Determining the effectiveness of the usability problem inspector: a theory-based model and tool for finding usability problems.
Despite the increased focus on usability and on the processes and methods used to increase usability, a substantial amount of software is unusable and poorly designed. Much of this is attributable to the lack of cost-effective usability evaluation tools that provide an interaction-based framework for identifying problems. We developed the user action framework and a corresponding evaluation tool, the usability problem inspector (UPI), to help organize usability concepts and issues into a knowledge base. We conducted a comprehensive comparison study to determine if our theory-based framework and tool could be effectively used to find important usability problems in an interface design, relative to two other established inspection methods (heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough). Results showed that the UPI scored higher than heuristic evaluation in terms of thoroughness, validity, and effectiveness and was consistent with cognitive walkthrough for these same measures. We also discuss other potential advantages of the UPI over heuristic evaluation and cognitive walkthrough when applied in practice. Potential applications of this work include a cost-effective alternative or supplement to lab-based formative usability evaluation during any stage of development.
Andre
Terence S
TS
Department of Behavioral Sciences and Leadership, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80840-6228, USA. terence.andre@usafa.af.mil
Hartson
H Rex
HR
Williges
Robert C
RC
D000328:Adult; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003658:Decision Making, Computer-Assisted; D006804:Ergonomics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008328:Man-Machine Systems; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011357:Product Line Management; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014584:User-Computer Interface