A simulation study concerning the effect of varying the residual phenotypic correlation on the power of bivariate quantitative trait loci linkage analysis.
The power of bivariate variance components (VC) linkage analysis is affected by the size and source of the phenotypic correlation between variables. In particular, several authors have suggested that the power to detect linkage is greatest when the quantitative trait locus (QTL) and residual sources of variation induce phenotypic covariation in opposite directions, and that this increase in power is greatest when unique environmental sources of variation induce covariation in the direction opposite to the QTL. The purpose of the present study was to investigate further the effect of varying the residual correlation between variables on the power to detect linkage in a bivariate variance components linkage analysis. Data were simulated for a biallelic QTL that pleiotropically influenced two variables. The power to detect linkage was calculated under a variety of situations in which the proportion of phenotypic covariance resulting from shared sources of variation and from unique sources of variation was varied. These simulations were performed for the case in which the QTL affected the two variables equally and also for the case in which the QTL made unequal contributions to each variable. Our results confirm that the power to detect QTLs in a bivariate test for linkage depends upon the size and source of the residual correlation between variables, being greatest when the QTL and unique environmental sources of variation induce phenotypic covariation in opposite directions. We also found that when the QTL affected the two variables unequally, the power to detect linkage increased markedly as the correlation between unique environmental sources of variation increased from 0.6 to 0.9. Similar results were obtained under a variety of genetic models, including when there were unequal allele frequencies and dominance at the QTL. We suggest that a promising strategy to increase the power to detect QTLs might be to collect data from variables where there is either good observational evidence (e.g., from multivariate structural equation modeling of twin data) or a sound theoretical argument that the QTL and environmental factors induce covariation in opposite directions.
Evans
David M
DM
Queensland Institute of Medical Research and Joint Genetics Program, University of Queensland, PO Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane 4029, Australia. davidE@qimr.edu.au
Duffy
David L
DL
D000483:Alleles; D002648:Child; D002874:Chromosome Mapping / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005787:Gene Frequency / Q000235:genetics; D005799:Genes, Dominant / Q000235:genetics; D005819:Genetic Markers / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D020412:Multifactorial Inheritance / Q000235:genetics; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010551:Personality / Q000235:genetics; D010641:Phenotype; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci / Q000235:genetics*; D035781:Siblings; D012931:Social Environment; D013223:Statistics as Topic
D005819:Genetic Markers