title: Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem.
abstract: Theories of insight problems are often tested by formulating hypotheses about the particular difficulties of individual insight problems. Such evaluations often implicitly assume that there is a single difficulty. We argue that the quantitatively small effects of many studies arise because the difficulty of many insight problems is determined by multiple factors, so the removal of 1 factor has limited effect on the solution rate. Difficulties can reside either in problem perception, in prior knowledge, or in the processing of the problem information. We support this multiple factors perspective through 3 experiments on the 9-dot problem (N.R.F. Maier, 1930). Our results lead to a significant reformulation of the classical hypothesis as to why this problem is difficult. The results have general implications for our understanding of insight problem solving and for the interpretation of data from studies that aim to evaluate hypotheses about the sources of difficulty of particular insight problems.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60607, USA. tkersh1@uic.edu
authors.forename: Trina C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Kershaw
authors.forename: Stellan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ohlsson
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods