title: Comparison of timed AI after synchronized ovulation to AI at estrus: reproductive and economic considerations.
abstract: A timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol using OvSynch was compared to artificial insemination (AI) at detected estrus in 2 large dairy herds differing in reproductive management. Cows were synchronized for TAI starting at 62 and 42 d in milk in herds 1 and 2, respectively. The OvSynch regimen included: GnRH (buserelin) at 0.02 mg (i.m.) on d 0; PGF2alpha (tiaprost) at 0.75 mg (i.m.) on d 7; buserelin at 0.02 mg (i.m.) on d 9; and TAI 16 to 20 h later. After TAI, cows seen in estrus received AI, whereas cows diagnosed not pregnant were resynchronized for TAI. Control cows received AI based on detected estrus after voluntary waiting periods of 72 d in herd 1 and 50 d in herd 2. An economic analysis included costs associated with days open, culling, AI, synchrony products, treatment, and examinations. A sensitivity analysis of those variables determined effects on total costs per pregnancy. Use of OvSynch reduced intervals to first AI and days open in both herds and reduced culling for infertility in herd 2. Conception rates for first AI at detected estrus were significantly higher compared to TAI in both herds and for overall AI at estrus in herd 2. For groups assigned to AI at estrus, mean 21-d submission rates over 200 d for AI were higher in herd 1 than in herd 2 (55.6 vs. 28.6%). Days open and culling were the major cost factors. Although OvSynch improved reproduction in both herds, AI based on detected estrus was economically superior in herd 1, whereas OvSynch was superior in herd 2. This was consistent across ranges of cost factors evaluated. Evaluation of synchrony protocols should include reproductive performance along with appropriate costs associated with treatments. Such costs may offset benefits to reproduction in herds with good estrous detection rates.
authors.affiliation: Clinic for Reproduction, Section of Production Medicine and Quality Management, Free University of Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany. tenhagen@bestandsbetreuung.de
authors.forename: B A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Tenhagen
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Drillich
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Surholt
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Heuwieser
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003612:Dairying / Q000191:economics*; D004971:Estrus; D005260:Female; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D010062:Ovulation Induction / Q000662:veterinary*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012098:Reproduction; D013997:Time Factors