title: Preconceptional care of women at booking visit at De Soysa Maternity Hospital and Castle Street Hospital for Women.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To study the preconceptional preparedness of women attending two antenatal clinics.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional descriptive study done in August and September 2001.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pregnant women attending the antenatal clinics De Soysa Maternity Hospital and Castle Street Hospital for Women for their booking visit.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pregnant women were randomly selected. Before collecting data the purpose of the study was explained and those who consented were recruited for the study. Data were collected on the basis of an interviewer administered questionnaire. Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo.
  
  
  RESULTS
  225 pregnant women were recruited. 55% of them were between the ages of 18 and 30 years. 96% had achieved an educational level of above year five. 55% were in their first pregnancy and 2.75 were grand-multipara. 186 (82.7%) were housewives. 81% had a planned pregnancy. Only 21% had received pre-pregnancy counselling, 52% of them from a specialist obstetrician, and 21% and 19% from a general practitioner and public health midwife. Only 15 (6.6%) had taken preconceptional folic acid supplementation, and all of them had a level of education of GCE (A/L) or above. 11 of those who took preconceptional folic acid were primipara. 159 (70.6%) had received rubella vaccination. Of those who did not take the vaccine, 44% knew about it but did not know its importance, and 38% did not know about its availability. 18% did not take it because of various myths that they believed in. Preconceptional health knowledge regarding pregnancy was assessed by asking 10 questions and expressing it as a score out of 10. This score showed a positive correlation to the level of education of the woman. A majority received information from the print (81.7%) and electronic (72.4%) media. 50% received information from a public health midwife, and 36% from doctors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preconceptional preparedness among our women is poor. However, rubella vaccination is relatively successful compared to other aspects of preconceptional preparedness.
authors.affiliation: Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo.
authors.forename: V P
authors.initials: VP
authors.lastname: Wickremasinghe
authors.forename: P P
authors.initials: PP
authors.lastname: Prageeth
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Pulleperuma
authors.forename: K S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Pushpakumara
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003906:Developing Countries; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education / Q000458:organization & administration; D006771:Hospitals, Maternity; D006801:Humans; D007226:Infant Mortality / Q000639:trends; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008428:Maternal Mortality / Q000639:trends; D016742:Preconception Care / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D011247:Pregnancy; D011248:Pregnancy Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D011322:Primary Prevention / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013188:Sri Lanka; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires