title: Weight status classification of patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis.
abstract: We tested the agreement between classifications of the weight status of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) by body mass index (BMI) and by body fat (BF) content (BF/W, where W = actual weight), when BF was computed as BF = W - V/0.73 from the Sahlgrenska, Watson, or Hume anthropometric formulas estimating body water (V) in 933 patients on PD and 7,737 outpatients without hydration disorders. We used currently accepted cut-off values for classifying subjects as underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese by BMI and BF/W. We obtained these values: BMI: men on PD (n = 555), 25.5 +/- 4.3; men with normal renal function [NRF (n = 5,906)], 27.7 +/- 5.1; women on PD (n = 378), 25.9 +/- 6.1; women with NRF (n = 1,831), 28.3 +/- 6.5; BFSahlgrenska/W--men on PD, 0.238 +/- 0.063; men with NRF, 0.274 +/- 0.052; women on PD, 0.342 +/- 0.89; women with NRF, 0.366 +/- 0.075. We obtained these regressions: Women on PD BMI = 12.0832 + 38.9550 (BFSahlgrenska/W) -92.9252 (BFSahlgrenska/W)2 +254.0675 (BFSahlgrenska/W)3, r2 = 0.917; Men on PD BMI = 19.4729 - 29.1310 (BFSahlgrenska/W) +213.7045 (BFSahlgrenska/W)2, r2 = 0.888. From those regressions, the BMI value corresponding to the BFSahlgrenska/W cut-off for underweight was similar to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) BMI cut-off for underweight. The BMI value corresponding to the BFSahlgrenska/W cut-off for obesity was substantially lower than the NIH BMI cut-off for obesity. The kappa ratios of the classifications of weight status by BMI and BFSahlgrenska/W varied between 0.142 and 0.304 (poor agreement), with more than 50% of the subjects classified in a more obese weight category by BFSahlgrenska/W than by BMI. Classification of the subjects by BMI and by BFSahlgrenska/W in quintiles or quartiles led to much higher kappa ratios, particularly in women. The results were similar in subjects with NRF and with the use of the Watson and Hume formulas to estimate BF. The use of arbitrary cut-off values of BMI or anthropometric BF/W to classify PD patients or patients without edematous states as underweight, normal-weight, overweight, or obese leads to substantial disagreement between the two classifications. Classification of weight status by BMI or BF/W in quintiles or quartiles improves substantially the agreement between the two classifications and should be preferred.
authors.affiliation: Renal Section, New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Department of Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
authors.forename: Antonios H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Tzamaloukas
authors.forename: Glen H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Murata
authors.forename: Dorothy J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Vanderjagt
authors.forename: Karen S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Servilla
authors.forename: Robert H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Glew
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D000886:Anthropometry; D001823:Body Composition; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001835:Body Weight; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory