Intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: Restenosis after direct stenting versus stenting with predilation in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (ISAR-DIRECT trial).
The objective of this randomized study was to assess whether direct stenting leads to less restenosis than does conventional stenting (CS) with predilation in clinical practice. We included 910 patients who were randomly assigned to undergo either direct stenting (DS; n = 456) or CS (n = 454). No significant difference was observed in the incidence of angiographic restenosis (primary endpoint): 23.6% for DS and 21.0% for CS (P = 0.41; relative risk = 1.1; 95% CI = 0.8-1.5). The incidence of target vessel revascularization was 17.3% among DS and 14.8% among CS patients (P = 0.29; relative risk = 1.2; 95% CI = 0.8-1.6). The combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction at one year was 9.0% in the DS group and 7.0% in the CS group (P = 0.28). In conclusion, direct stenting is not associated with any reduction of thrombotic and restenotic complications as compared to the conventional stenting.
Mehilli
Julinda
J
Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany. mehilli@dhm.mhn.de
Kastrati
Adnan
A
Dirschinger
Josef
J
Etzel
Lena
L
Bollwein
Hildegard
H
Pache
Jürgen
J
Schühlen
Helmut
H
Von Beckerath
Nicolas
N
Seyfarth
Melchior
M
Schmitt
Claus
C
Schömig
Albert
A
D000368:Aged; D002404:Catheterization; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000517:prevention & control*; D023903:Coronary Restenosis / Q000453:epidemiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000601:surgery*; D015607:Stents; D016896:Treatment Outcome