title: Responsibility, guilt, and decision under risk.
abstract: We hypothesize that individuals' choices (risk-seeking/risk-aversion) depend on moral values and, in particular, on how subjects evaluate themselves as guilty or as victims of a wrong rather than on the descriptions of the outcomes as given in the options and evaluated accordingly as gains or losses (framing effect). People who evaluate themselves as victims are expected to show a risk-seeking preference (context of innocence). People who evaluate themselves as guilty are expected to show a risk-averse preference (context of guilt). Responses of 232 participants to a decision problem were compared in four different conditions involving two-story formats (innocence/guilt) and two-question-options formats (gain/loss). Regardless of the format of the question options, the story format appears to be an important determinant of individuals' preferences.
authors.affiliation: Scuola di Specializzazione in Psicoterapia Cognitiva, Associazione di Psicologia Cognitiva, Rome, Italy. mancini@apc.it
authors.forename: Francesco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Mancini
authors.forename: Amelia
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gangemi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D006167:Guilt; D006801:Humans; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012941:Social Responsibility