Contrast sensitivity to angular frequency gratings is not higher than to Cartesian gratings.
When contrast sensitivity functions to Cartesian and angular gratings were compared in previous studies the peak sensitivity to angular stimuli was reported to be 0.21 log units higher. In experiments carried out to repeat this result, we used the same two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, but improved experimental control and precision by increasing contrast resolution from 8 to 12 bits, increasing the screen refresh rate from 30 Hz interlaced to 85 Hz non-interlaced, linearizing the voltage-luminance relation, modulating luminance in frequencies that minimize pixel aliasing, and improving control of the subject's exposure to the stimuli. The contrast sensitivity functions to Cartesian and angular gratings were similar in form and peak sensitivity (2.4 cycles per visual degree (c/deg) and 32 c/360 degrees, respectively) to those reported in a previous study (3 c/deg and 32 c/360 degrees, respectively), but peak sensitivity to angular stimuli was 0.13 log units lower than that to Cartesian stimuli. When the experiment was repeated, this time simulating the experimental control level used in the previous study, no difference between the peak sensitivity to Cartesian and angular stimuli was found. This result agrees with most current models that assume Cartesian filtering at the first visual processing stage. The discrepancy in the results is explained in part by differences in the degree of experimental control.
Zana
Y
Y
Departamento de Psicologia, LabVis, CFCH, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Acad. Hélio Costa, s/n 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brazil. zana@ufpe.br
Cavalcanti
A C G T
AC
D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology