title: A multicentre trial comparing different concentrations of ropivacaine plus sufentanil with bupivacaine plus sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the optimal concentration of ropivacaine for bolus-only patient-controlled epidural labour analgesia, three different doses of ropivacaine were evaluated in comparison with bupivacaine in a double-blinded multicentre study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four hundred-and-fifty labouring parturients at term in three different academic institutions were randomized to four groups receiving bupivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil 0.75 microg mL(-1), ropivacaine 0.125% or 0.175% with sufentanil 0.75 microg mL(-1), or ropivacaine 0.2%. After an initial bolus of 10 mL of the study solution, and once visual analogue scores (VAS) were below 30 mm, patient-controlled epidural analgesia was initiated with a bolus of 4 mL, a lockout interval of 15 min and without a background infusion. Variables studied were the quality of analgesia, incidence of side-effects, the degree of motor blockade, and the mode of delivery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Bupivacaine 0.125% and ropivacaine 0.125% with sufentanil proved equally effective in providing labour analgesia without a difference in local anaesthetic consumption (48.6 +/- 23 mg bupivacaine vs. 52.1 +/- 38 mg ropivacaine), motor blockade or mode of delivery. Ropivacaine 0.175% plus sufentanil enhanced the quality of analgesia of the initial loading dose, whereas ropivacaine 0.2% without sufentanil increased the consumption of local anaesthetics (80.2 +/- 34 mg; P < 0.05) and the degree of motor blockade.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite recent studies indicating that bupivacaine and ropivacaine may not be equipotent, both local anaesthetics provided equi-effective analgesia at equal doses without a difference in side-effects.
authors.affiliation: Universitätsklinikum Münster, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Germany.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Gogarten
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Van de Velde
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Soetens
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Van Aken
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Brodner
authors.forename: H F
authors.initials: HF
authors.lastname: Gramke
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Soetens
authors.forename: M A E
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Marcus
mesh_terms: D000009:Abdominal Muscles / Q000187:drug effects; D000328:Adult; D000577:Amides / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D015360:Analgesia, Epidural / Q000009:adverse effects; D016362:Analgesia, Obstetrical / Q000009:adverse effects; D016058:Analgesia, Patient-Controlled / Q000009:adverse effects; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D002045:Bupivacaine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D002585:Cesarean Section; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000187:drug effects; D006340:Heart Rate, Fetal / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D009407:Nerve Block; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011247:Pregnancy; D000077212:Ropivacaine; D017409:Sufentanil / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects
chemical_list: D000577:Amides; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D000779:Anesthetics, Local; D000077212:Ropivacaine; D017409:Sufentanil; D002045:Bupivacaine