title: The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion.
abstract: One of the goals of this study was to examine the nature and role of distant visual information sampled during locomotion in the feedforward control of leading and trailing limb while an individual is required to step over an obstacle in the travel path. In addition we were interested in whether or not on-line visual information available while the limb (lead or trail) is stepping over the obstacle influences limb trajectory control and whether the information provided during lead limb cross would be used to calibrate movement of the trail limb. Towards this end, we manipulated availability of vision following an initial dynamic sampling period during the approach phase in proximity to the obstacle and during the lead and trail limb stepping over the obstacle. Ten participants completed 40 trials of obstacle crossing in 8 testing conditions. Initial dynamic visual sampling was sufficient to ensure successful task performance in the absence of vision in the approach phase and during both lead and trail limb stepping over the obstacle. Despite successful task performance, foot placement of the lead and trail limb before obstacle crossing and limb elevation over the obstacle were increased after withdrawal of vision in the approach area. Furthermore, the correlation between toe clearance and foot placement was diminished. While both limbs require feedforward visual information to control the step over the obstacle, only lead limb elevation was influenced by availability of on-line visual information during obstacle crossing. Results were in agreement with the notion of primacy of information inherent in the optic array over those from static samples of the environment in guiding locomotion. It is suggested that the expected proprioceptive feedback information associated with the limb posture before the obstacle, reconstructed using visual memory from dynamic sampling of the environment, mismatched with those from the actual limb position. Accordingly, participants adopted a different strategy that enabled them to clear the obstacle with a higher safety margin.
authors.affiliation: Gait and Posture Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, N2L3G1, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Amir A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Mohagheghi
authors.forename: Renato
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Moraes
authors.forename: Aftab E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Patla
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002490:Central Nervous System / Q000502:physiology; D005246:Feedback / Q000502:physiology*; D005528:Foot / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology*; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011434:Proprioception / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*