Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills.
OBJECTIVE
We investigated the impact of robotics on surgical skills by comparing traditional laparoscopy with the da Vinci Surgical System in the performance of various laparoscopic training drills.


METHODS
Twenty-one surgeons performed eight timed drills of increasing difficulty with a laparoscopic trainer and the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Sunnyvale, CA). The mean time to drill completion, drill time variance, and statistical analysis were performed. Surgeons were also questioned about their perception of the robotic technology following completion of the drill series.


RESULTS
The mean time required to complete the first drill was 69 seconds with laparoscopy and 57 seconds with the robotic system. The mean times for drill two were 67 seconds with laparoscopy and 44 seconds with robotics; for drill three, the times were 88 seconds for laparoscopy and 61 seconds for robotics, and for drill four, 186 seconds with laparoscopy and 71 seconds with robotics. Only the first drill failed to show a statistically significant difference between the laparoscopic and robotic groups.


CONCLUSIONS
The robotic system allowed surgeons to complete drills faster than traditional laparoscopy. Novice laparoscopic surgeons performed three of the four drills faster robotically than did expert laparoscopic surgeons. These findings may indicate that the attributes of the robotic system level the playing field between surgeons of different skill levels. The next generation of surgeons must focus on this evolving technology and its application in the operating room of the future.
Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Richard
R
Sarle
Ashutosh
A
Tewari
Alok
A
Shrivastava
James
J
Peabody
Mani
M
Menon
D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D010535:Laparoscopy; D012371:Robotics; D013995:Time; D014572:Urology / Q000193:education*