Ballistic reactions under different motor sets.
In preparation for performing task specific ballistic movements, subjects may choose among different possibilities for setting up their motor apparatus, ranging from quiet resting to different types of muscle activation. In the study presented here, we investigated whether differences in the motor set modify either the reaction time or the kinematic characteristics of the movement. Subjects wearing surface EMG recording electrodes in the wrist extensor (WE) and wrist flexor (WF) muscles were requested to react to the presentation of a visual stimulus by performing a ballistic wrist extension movement of an amplitude of about 50 degrees in the following experimental conditions: resting quietly, which was considered as the control condition (CC); isometric contraction (IC), in which subjects were required to activate WE and WF muscles isometrically; rapid oscillations (RO), in which subjects were requested to make a fast oscillatory wrist movement; and slow oscillations (SO), in which subjects were maintaining a slow oscillatory motion of the wrist. To constrain the movement to the wrist joint and limit the action of postural muscles, the subject's forearm and hand were attached to joined non-resistive metallic platforms, allowing for free non-frictional displacement. In the EMG recordings, we measured the size of the EMG bursts in agonist and antagonist muscles, and the inter-burst intervals. In movement recordings, we measured movement onset latency and the velocity profile. Movement onset was delayed in SO with respect to all other conditions. Conversely, peak velocity was larger in all test conditions in comparison to CC. There were no differences in the size of the first EMG burst of the agonist muscle, but significant changes occurred in the subsequent bursts recorded in the agonist and antagonist muscles. Our study indicates that the motor program used to execute a ballistic voluntary movement is influenced by the conditions of the motor system. The configuration of the motor set should be specifically considered in the search for improving the speed of the reaction and the kinematics of ballistic movements.
Castellote
J M
JM
Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Valls-Solé
J
J
Sanegre
M T
MT
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000328:Adult; D001132:Arm / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002490:Central Nervous System / Q000502:physiology; D004576:Electromyography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014836:Volition / Q000502:physiology; D014955:Wrist Joint / Q000502:physiology