[A study of 100 consecutive children presenting with learning disabilities].
METHODS
To determine the impact of a neuropediatrician view on diagnosis and management of learning disabilities.


METHODS
Retrospective review of the medical records of the last 100 children attending for learning disabilities from 1st June 2000 through 31st May 2001. Assessment concerned school curriculum, type of management before consultation, diagnosis procedure and type of management following consultation. Differential diagnosis was made in 100% of cases following evaluation.


RESULTS
The three main diagnoses were attentionnal deficit disorder with hyperactivity (39%), mental retardation (17%) and dyslexia (7%). Mental retardation and cerebral palsy diagnoses had not been made before consultation. Conversely, 70% of the diagnoses of dyslexia made before consultation were incorrect. Medical treatment was proposed in 38% of cases and modification in the management in 59% of cases.


CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights the interest of a rigorous diagnosis procedure for learning disabilities, based on a neuropediatrics examination, a cognitive evaluation and phonological and lexical evaluation. It only may lead to an appropriate management.
Cuvellier
J C
JC
Service de neuropédiatrie, centre hospitalier régional et universitaire de Lille, hôpital Salengro, 59037 Lille cedex, France. jc-cuvellier@chru-lille.fr
Pandit
F
F
Casalis
S
S
Lemaître
M P
MP
Cuisset
J M
JM
Platof
A
A
Vallée
L
L
D000293:Adolescent; D001289:Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007859:Learning Disabilities / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies