Choice based on exclusion in pigeons.
When humans acquire a conditional discrimination and are given a novel-sample-comparison choice, they often reject a comparison known to be associated with a different sample and choose the alternative comparison by default (or by exclusion). In Experiment 1, we found that if, following matching training, we replaced both of the samples, acquisition took five times longer than if we replaced only one of the samples. Apparently, the opportunity to reject one of the comparisons facilitated the association of the other sample with the remaining comparison. In Experiment 2, we first trained pigeons to treat two samples differently (to associate Sample A with Comparison 1 and Sample B with Comparison 2) and then trained them to associate one of those samples with a new comparison (e.g., Sample A with Comparison 3) and to associate a novel sample (Sample C) with a different, new comparison (Comparison 4). When Sample B then replaced Sample C, the pigeons showed a significant tendency to choose Comparison 4 over Comparison 3. Thus, when given the opportunity, pigeons will choose by exclusion.
University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Tricia S
TS
Clement
Thomas R
TR
Zentall
D000818:Animals; D001070:Appetitive Behavior; D001245:Association Learning; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003118:Color Perception; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D014163:Transfer, Psychology