A comparison of in-person examination and video otoscope imaging for tympanostomy tube follow-up.
The objective of this study was to determine if video otoscope still images (640 x 480 pixel resolution) of the tympanic membrane following surgical placement of tympanostomy tubes are comparable to an in-person microscopic examination. Forty patients having undergone tympanostomy tube placement in both ears were independently examined in-person by two otolaryngologists and imaged using a video otoscope and telemedicine software package. The two physicians later reviewed images at 6 and 12 weeks. Physical examination findings and diagnosis were documented and compared for their concordance using kappa statistics. For both physicians, the intraprovider concordance between the in-person examination and the corresponding image review was high for each of the physical examination findings: Tube In 93-94% (K 0.85-0.87), Tube Patent 86-93% (K 0.74-0.85), Drainage 94-98% (K 0.42-0.66), Perforation 85-98% (K 0.40-0.84), Granulation 95-99% (K -0.01 to 0.00), Middle Ear Fluid 89-91% (K -0.03 to 0.50), and Retracted 89-94% (K 0.13-0.43). These agreement rates are similar to the normal interprovider concordance observed when two physicians independently examined the same patient in-person for physical exam findings: Tube In 96% (K 0.93), Tube Patent 94% (K 0.88), Drainage 96% (K 0.56), Perforation 90% (K 0.60), Granulation 96% (K 0.39), Middle Ear Fluid 88% (K 0.14), and Retracted 91% (K 0.43). For both physicians, the intraprovider diagnostic concordance between the in-person examination and the corresponding image review was high 79-85% (K 0.67-0.76). The interprovider diagnostic concordance for the in-person exam was 88% (K 0.81). The interprovider diagnostic concordance when two physicians independently reviewed all images was 84% (K 0.74), and 89% (K 0.80) when poor images were excluded. This study demonstrates that physician review of video otoscope images is comparable to an in-person microscopic examination. Store-and-forward video otoscopy may be an acceptable method of following patients post-tympanostomy tube placement.
Patricoski
Chris
C
Alaska Federal Health Care Access Network, Anchorage, Alaska, USA. cpatricoski@afhcan.org
Kokesh
John
J
Ferguson
A Stewart
AS
Koller
Kathryn
K
Zwack
Greg
G
Provost
Ellen
E
Holck
Peter
P
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000413:Alaska; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D008876:Middle Ear Ventilation / Q000295:instrumentation*; D010036:Otolaryngology; D019720:Otoscopes; D017216:Telemedicine