Searching the core of emergency medicine.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to test whether focus groups involving medical students, house officers, senior doctors, and nurses could identify an undergraduate emergency medicine core curriculum.


METHODS
From May 2001 to January 2002, we interviewed 12 homogeneous focus groups within all 88 participants. Three focus groups were composed of medical students; three of house officers, three of senior doctors, and three focus groups were composed of nurses. Each interview lasted 2 h. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using qualitative methods.


RESULTS
The focus groups suggested and discussed in all 196 objectives. Students, physicians, and nurses agreed that newly graduated physicians should master history taking, 21 clinical disorders, 15 practical skills, interpretation of two diagnostic tests, two general diagnostic skills, and two leadership skills. Apart from these 43 core objectives, disagreement was substantial. Participants gave very different priorities to communication, knowledge about clinical disorders, practical clinical skills, leadership, and "the art of medicine".


CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, focus groups could identify an emergency medicine core curriculum. However, participants had very different perspectives on the curriculum. Focus groups could be one very practicable part of seeking consensus on what is core and securing local roots and ownership to an undergraduate emergency medicine curriculum before and during implementation.
Mørcke
A M
AM
Unit of Medical Education, University Hospital, Aarhus University, Universitetsparken, Bygning 611, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Wichmann-Hansen
G
G
Guldbrand-Nielsen
D
D
Tønnesen
E
E
Eika
B
B
D003479:Curriculum; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate; D004635:Emergency Medicine / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans