[Clinical evaluation of effects from neoadjuvant chemotherapy with epirubicin plus paclitaxel in cases of locally advanced breast cancer--comparative study of treatment with 2 and 4 cycles].
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of epirubicin plus paclitaxel was administered to 75 patients (including a 2-cycle group of 39 patients and a 4-cycle group of 36 patients) with locally advanced breast cancer (35 cases of stage IIb, 28 of stage IIIa, 12 of stage IIIb) to compare efficacy and toxicity of 2 cycle and 4 cycle regimens. All patients were female. They were treated with epirubicin 60 mg/m2, on day 1, by i.v., followed by paclitaxel 150 mg/m2, by 3 hour continuous infusion on day 2 repeated every 3 weeks. Premedication with dexamethasone, ondansetron, diphenhydramine and cimetidine were administered to prevent gastroenteritic and allergic reactions before chemotherapy. Thirty-nine patients were given 2 cycles and thirty-six were given 4 cycles of this regimen. One of 39 patients had complete response, 28 had partial response and 10 had no change in the 2-cycle group. In addition, 21 of 36 patients had complete response (including 9 who had pathologic complete response), 13 had partial response and 2 had no change. The response rates were 74% (29/39) in the 2-cycle group and 94% (34/36) in the 4-cycle group. There were no progressive disease in these 2 groups. However a higher proportion of PR was observed in stage II patients than in stage III patients. Twelve of 36 patients underwent breast conserving surgery, as tumor size had become smaller and down-staging was realized after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, axillary lymph nodes were palpable in all 75 patients before neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the ET regimen. But 46% (18/39) in the 2-cycle group and 75% (27/36) in the 4-cycle group became impalpable. Conversely, major toxicities (including leukopenia and gastroenteric reactions) were similar in both groups, but myalgia, arthralgia, neurotoxicity and alopecia were more severe in the 4-cycle group than in the 2-cycle group. In the present study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a 4-cycle ET regimen was more effective than with a 2-cycle regimen in down staging locally advanced breast cancer. Although major toxicities were more severe in the 4-cycle group than in the 2-cycle group, the regimen was tolerable and safe.
Tong
Fuzhong
F
Dept. of 4th Surgery and Breast Disease Research Center, People's Hospital, Peking University Medical School, Beijing 100044, China.
Yang
Deqi
D
Zhou
Bo
B
Cao
Yingming
Y
Liu
Peng
P
Liu
Hongjun
H
Wang
Shu
S
Qiao
Xinmin
X
Zhang
Jiaqing
J
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001853:Bone Marrow / Q000187:drug effects; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000601:surgery; D017024:Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000139:chemically induced; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D015251:Epirubicin / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015412:Mastectomy, Segmental; D008875:Middle Aged; D020360:Neoadjuvant Therapy; D020258:Neurotoxicity Syndromes / Q000209:etiology; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects
D015251:Epirubicin; D017239:Paclitaxel