Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: initial virological and clinical findings.
BACKGROUND
The clinical response of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin was examined after establishing the in vitro antiviral susceptibility of the SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of antiviral agents.


METHODS
The in vitro susceptibility of the prototype of SARS associated coronavirus to a panel of nucleoside analogues and protease inhibitors currently licensed for clinical use was studied. Forty one patients with SARS followed for 3 weeks were treated with a combination of lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin. The clinical progress and virological outcomes were monitored and compared with 111 patients treated with ribavirin only who served as historical controls.


RESULTS
In vitro antiviral activity against SARS associated coronavirus was demonstrated for lopinavir and ribavirin at concentrations of 4 micro g/ml and 50 micro g/ml, respectively, only at 48 hours. The adverse clinical outcome (ARDS or death) was significantly lower in the treatment group than in the historical controls (2.4% v 28.8%, p<0.001) at day 21 after the onset of symptoms. The adverse outcome remained significantly lower in the treatment group than in the controls-both those diagnosed early (p<0.001) and those diagnosed later in the course of the epidemic (p = 0.002)-but there was no significant difference in adverse outcome rates between the two time periods (p = 0.548). No time related difference in outcome was observed in the control groups. A reduction in steroid usage and nosocomial infections was seen in patients initially treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, and these patients had a decreasing viral load and rising peripheral lymphocyte count. Multivariate analysis showed that age, hepatitis B carrier status, and lack of treatment with this antiviral combination were independent predictors of an adverse outcome. Lopinavir/ritonavir treatment was associated with a better outcome even when adjusted for baseline lactate dehydrogenase level.


CONCLUSIONS
The apparent favourable clinical response with lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin supports further randomised placebo controlled trials in patients with SARS.
Chu
C M
CM
Department of Microbiology and Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. kyyuen@hkucc.hku.hk
Cheng
V C C
VC
Hung
I F N
IF
Wong
M M L
MM
Chan
K H
KH
Chan
K S
KS
Kao
R Y T
RY
Poon
L L M
LL
Wong
C L P
CL
Guan
Y
Y
Peiris
J S M
JS
Yuen
K Y
KY
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003428:Cross Infection / Q000150:complications; D018450:Disease Progression; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D017320:HIV Protease Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D061466:Lopinavir; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D011744:Pyrimidinones / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D019438:Ritonavir / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D045169:Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000821:virology; D013256:Steroids / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D019562:Viral Load
D017320:HIV Protease Inhibitors; D011744:Pyrimidinones; D013256:Steroids; D061466:Lopinavir; D019438:Ritonavir