One eye but no vision: cave fish with induced eyes do not respond to light.
One of the most intriguing questions in evolutionary biology is the degree to which behavior is a necessary consequence of morphology. We explore this issue by examining phototactic behavior in epigean (eyed surface-dwelling) and troglomorphic (blind cave) forms of the teleost Astyanax fasciatus whose eyes were modified during embryogenesis by removing one or both lens vesicles from the epigean form or by transplanting the lens vesicle from an epigean fish into the optic cup of a blind cave form. Lens removal results in eye degeneration and blindness in adult epigean fish, whereas lens transplantation stimulates growth of the eye, inducing the development of optic tissues in the normally eyeless adult cave fish. Photoresponsiveness was examined by placing fish in an aquarium with one half illuminated and the other half dark and scoring their presence in the illuminated or dark half. Both the eyeless epigean fish and cave fish with induced eyes are indifferent to the illumination whereas the surface forms are scotophilic, suggesting that optic development and phototactic behavior are decoupled.
Environmental Studies Program, Department of Biology, Macalester College, St. Paul, Minnesota 55105-1899, USA. aromero@astate.edu
Aldemaro
A
Romero
Steven M
SM
Green
Andrea
A
Romero
Megan M
MM
Lelonek
Katy C
KC
Stropnicky
D000818:Animals; D001766:Blindness / Q000196:embryology; D004627:Embryonic Induction; D005123:Eye / Q000196:embryology*; D005399:Fishes / Q000196:embryology / Q000502:physiology*; D007908:Lens, Crystalline / Q000196:embryology / Q000637:transplantation*; D008027:Light; D009068:Movement / Q000528:radiation effects; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013045:Species Specificity; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*