Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of prognostic factors and screening tools.
OBJECTIVE
Our purpose was to identify the factors associated with vaginal delivery after trial of labor in patients with a prior cesarean and to evaluate the effectiveness of existing screening tools.


METHODS
Studies were identified through MEDLINE and HealthSTAR (1980-2002), reference list reviews, and suggestions of national experts.


RESULTS
Thirteen of the 100 eligible studies provided fair to good quality evidence for the predictive nature of 12 factors. Two of the six screening tools were considered promising and demonstrated reproducibility through validation studies.


CONCLUSIONS
There is little high-quality data to guide clinical decisions regarding which women are likely to have a successful trial of labor. Although we identified two validated screening tools that may be reasonable for practitioners to use, further development is needed to deliver them in a user-friendly manner and further research is needed to determine the clinical setting in which they are most useful. Conducting high-quality research on the factors that delineate women who are at higher likelihood of vaginal delivery without complications and developing accurate user-friendly screening tools to integrate these data should be a national research priority.
Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jason N
JN
Hashima
Karen B
KB
Eden
Patricia
P
Osterweil
Peggy
P
Nygren
Jeanne-Marie
JM
Guise
D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008423:Maternal Age; D016017:Odds Ratio; D011247:Pregnancy; D011379:Prognosis; D018570:Risk Assessment; D014219:Trial of Labor; D016064:Vaginal Birth after Cesarean / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*