Biomechanical comparison of straight and staggered implant placement configurations.
The effect of buccolingual staggered implant placement on stress distribution within the supporting structure was examined photoelastically. Two photoelastic models of a human mandible, edentulous distal to the canine, were fabricated. Three screw-type implants were embedded into the edentulous region of each model. The implants were placed in a straight line in one model and in a buccolingual staggered configuration in the other. Vertical and lateral loads were applied to a fixed partial denture superstructure. No clear biomechanical advantage to a staggered 1.5 mm buccal and lingual offset placement configuration was observed.
Itoh
Hidemi
H
Division of Stomatognathic Physiology and Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Dentistry, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Caputo
Angelo A
AA
Kuroe
Toshifumi
T
Nakahara
Hiroko
H
D001718:Birefringence; D019245:Compressive Strength; D003758:Dental Implantation, Endosseous / Q000379:methods*; D015921:Dental Implants; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D004548:Elasticity; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D007576:Jaw, Edentulous, Partially / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D008334:Mandible; D003765:Models, Dental; D023861:Photography, Dental; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D016474:Weight-Bearing
D015921:Dental Implants