The pharmacodynamic effects of a lower-lipid emulsion of propofol: a comparison with the standard propofol emulsion.
Using a randomized, double-blind protocol design, we compared a new lower-lipid emulsion of propofol (Ampofol) containing propofol 1%, soybean oil 5%, and egg lecithin 0.6% with the most commonly used formulation of propofol (Diprivan) with respect to onset of action and recovery profiles, as well as intraoperative efficacy, when administered for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia as part of a "balanced" anesthetic technique in 63 healthy outpatients. Anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.1 microg/kg (or fentanyl 1 microg/kg) and propofol 2 mg/kg IV and maintained with a variable-rate propofol infusion, 120-200 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Onset times to loss of the eyelash reflex and dropping a syringe were recorded. Severity of pain on injection, speed of induction, intraoperative hemodynamic variables, and electroencephalographic bispectral index values were assessed. Recovery times to opening eyes and orientation were noted. The results demonstrated that there were no significant differences between Ampofol and Diprivan with respect to onset times, speed of induction, anesthetic dose requirements, bispectral index values, hemodynamic variables, recovery variables, or patient satisfaction. However, the incidence of pain on injection was more frequent in the Ampofol group (26% versus 6%, P < 0.05). We conclude that Ampofol is equipotent to Diprivan with respect to its anesthetic properties but was associated with a more frequent incidence of mild pain on injection.


CONCLUSIONS
The pharmacodynamic profile of a lower-lipid containing emulsion of propofol (Ampofol) was compared with Diprivan when administered for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. This preliminary study demonstrated that the two formulations of propofol were equivalent with respect to their induction and maintenance properties. However, Ampofol was associated with a more frequent incidence of pain on injection.
Song
Dajun
D
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas 75390-9068, USA.
Hamza
Mohamed
M
White
Paul F
PF
Klein
Kevin
K
Recart
Alejandro
A
Khodaparast
Omeed
O
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002626:Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000187:drug effects; D004655:Emulsions; D005079:Excipients; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D008055:Lipids; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016343:Monitoring, Intraoperative; D013517:Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures; D015742:Propofol / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011446:Prospective Studies
D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D004655:Emulsions; D005079:Excipients; D008055:Lipids; D015742:Propofol