[A questionnaire survey of mental health in cities, towns and villages for the partial amendment of the law on mental health and welfare for people with mental disorders].
OBJECTIVE
In accordance with the partial amendment of the Law on Mental Health and Welfare for People with Mental Disorders, some mental health and welfare work has been performed under the jurisdiction of cities, towns and villages instead of prefectures since April, 2002. What is the role of prefectural health centres in supporting cities, towns and villages under the partial amendment? To consider this question in the light of transfer of responsibilities from prefectures to the municipalities, we investigated the situation in municipalities in October, 2001.


METHODS
A total of 500 municipalities with populations less than 100,000 were recruited and questionnaire survey was carried out to study the mental health and welfare work, the department in charge and other relevant data.


RESULTS
A total of 359 municipalities responded to the questionnaire (the response rate was 71.8%). Mental health and welfare work came under the jurisdiction of 58.5% of the municipalities. The persons in charge were mainly public health nurses and officers and few municipalities had specialists. About 64% of the municipalities had designated a department in charge of the transferred work, but only 16% had designated the number of persons in charge. Although municipalities must provide services for patients living at home as of April, 2002, under the partial amendment, 24.2% of municipalities had already been providing such service previously. About 60% of municipalities had staff who planned to participate in training for care management. For the office work related to the delivery of the health and welfare note for people with mental disorders and public expenditure for hospital expenses, 16.2% of municipalities had designated specialists as persons in charge and 24.2% of municipalities had secured space for privacy. Almost all (98.6%) municipalities pointed to problems in the transfer, which included the shortage of specialists and requested health centres to provide specific information.


CONCLUSIONS
Although mental health and welfare work comes under the jurisdiction of over half of the municipalities, few have specialists for this purpose. Support services for patients living at home were often provided by the municipalities prior to the partial amendment of the Law going into effect. As municipalities stressed the shortage of specialists and requested specific information, health centres need to support municipalities from the standpoint of their specialized abilities.
Tsunoda
Masashi
M
Department of Public Health, Fukushima Medical University.
Ueno
Bunya
B
Takeshima
Tadashi
T
Minami
Ryuichi
R
Takaoka
Michio
M
Ishige
Kyoko
K
Oi
Teru
T
Sasaki
Shoko
S
D003156:Community Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan / Q000453:epidemiology; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D009111:Local Government; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology*; D008603:Mental Health / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012946:Social Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012947:Social Work; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires