title: Inequalities in health and intergenerational equity.
abstract: In the popular folklore three-score-years-and-ten is treated as a fair innings for people, and thereby serves as an informal reference point for judgements about distributive justice within a community. But length of life alone is an insufficient basis for such judgements--a person's health-related quality-of-life also needs to be taken into account. If one of the objectives of public policy is to reduce inequalities in lifetime health, it will be demonstrated that this is very likely to require systematic discrimination against the older members of a community. The notion of community solidarity will also be tested, because a decision will need to be made as to whether the same fair innings applies to all members of the community, or whether some are entitled to more than others. The strength of the fair innings principle is that it brings these issues to the fore in a systematic way which should aid their resolution in a practical context.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Health Economics, University of York, UK.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D006262:Health; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000941:ethics*; D006291:Health Policy; D006292:Health Priorities; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D016901:Intergenerational Relations; D008017:Life Expectancy; D018579:Patient Selection / Q000941:ethics; D011287:Prejudice; D011788:Quality of Life; D019057:Quality-Adjusted Life Years; D040841:Resource Allocation / Q000941:ethics*; D012935:Social Justice