New trends in the surgical treatment of outlet obstruction: clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques from a randomised controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE
A randomised trial was undertaken to compare the clinical and functional results of two novel transanal stapled techniques in patients with outlet obstruction syndrome.


METHODS
Ninety-six females with outlet obstruction were treated with medical therapy and biofeedback for 2 months; 67 non-responders were evaluated by the Constipation Scoring and Continence Grading Systems, clinical examination, endoscopy, dynamic defecography, anorectal manometry, transanal ultrasound and anal EMG, and 50 of them, all affected with descending perineum, intussusception and rectocele, were randomly assigned to two groups and operated on: 25 patients (mean age 53.2+/-15.3 years) underwent a single Stapled Trans-Anal Prolapsectomy, associated with Perineal Levatorplasty (STAPL Group), and the other 25 (mean 54.6+/-14.2 years) underwent a double Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR Group). Patients were followed-up for a mean period of 23.4+/-5.1 months in STAPL Group and 22.3+/-4.8 in STARR Group.


RESULTS
STARR Group showed a significantly (p<0.0001) lower pattern of postoperative pain and a greater decrease (P=0.0117) of the rectal sensitivity threshold volume; otherwise, no differences were found in operative time, hospital stay, or time of inability to work. Complications included delayed healing of the perineal wound (ten), dyspareunia (five), urinary retention (two) and stenosis (one) in STAPL Group, and urge to defecate (four), transitory incontinence to flatus (two), urinary retention (two), bleeding (one) and stenosis (one) in STARR Group. All constipation symptoms significantly improved without worsening of anal continence and with excellent/good outcome at 20 months in 76 and 88% of patients of STAPL Group and STARR Group, respectively. Seven patients of STAPL Group had a little residual rectocele, while both intussusception and rectocele were corrected in all patients of STARR Group. Neither operation modified anal pressures or caused lesions of anal sphincters.


CONCLUSIONS
Both techniques are safe and effective in the treatment of outlet obstruction; nevertheless, the double Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection seems to be preferable due to less pain, absence of dyspareunia, reduced rectal sensitivity threshold volume and absence of residual rectocele at defecography.
Boccasanta
Paolo
P
1st Department of General Surgery, Ospedale Maggiore di Milano, I.R.C.C.S. University of Milan, Milan, Italy. pboccasanta@tiscali.it
Venturi
Marco
M
Salamina
Giovanni
G
Cesana
Bruno Mario
BM
Bernasconi
Francesco
F
Roviaro
Giancarlo
G
D001003:Anal Canal / Q000503:physiopathology; D003248:Constipation / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D019841:Defecography; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007415:Intestinal Obstruction / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D007443:Intussusception / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D008365:Manometry; D008875:Middle Aged; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000517:prevention & control; D012002:Rectal Diseases / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D012005:Rectal Prolapse / Q000601:surgery; D020047:Rectocele / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D012007:Rectum / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D016896:Treatment Outcome