title: Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma.
abstract: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is still the most sensitive and specific method for the detection of lymph node metastases in stage I nonseminomatous testicular carcinoma. In stage II disease, residual malignant tumor and mature teratoma can be removed. Acceptance of this operation, however, has decreased due to the morbidity caused by the open approach. To reduce this morbidity, and to improve the acceptance of RPLND, laparoscopy has been introduced. Clinical data with long-term follow-up are now available which demonstrate the technical feasibility of laparoscopic RPLND. Studies comparing laparoscopy and open surgery show advantages for the laparoscopic approach in terms of reduced blood loss, intraoperative complications and operative time. Mainly minor complications, such as chylous ascites or lymphocele formation, are observed. The conversion rate to open surgery, mainly due to intraoperative bleeding, is acceptable at less than 10%. As in open surgery, antegrade ejaculation can be preserved successfully. RPLND has also been shown to provide adequate oncological results. In stage I disease, lymph node metastasis is found in 25-41% of cases. Patients with histologically proven retroperitoneal tumor receive adjuvant chemotherapy whereas individuals without evidence of retroperitoneal disease do not require additional treatment. Follow-up controls in both groups, without local recurrence, demonstrate the excellent diagnostic accuracy of this procedure. Meanwhile laparoscopic RPLND has also been introduced successfully in the management of stage II disease. Small volume residual tumors can be removed with an acceptable complication rate. However, this operation is technically demanding and should be performed only at institutions with considerable laparoscopic experience. In conclusion, laparoscopic RPLND is a safe method for low-stage germ cell tumors with minimal invasiveness and excellent clinical results. Thus laparoscopy might contribute to a better acceptance of RPLND.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Strasse 3. 72076 Tuebingen, Germany. Stefan.Corvin@med.uni-tuebingen.de
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Corvin
authors.forename: Markus
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kuczyk
authors.forename: Aristotelis
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Anastasiadis
authors.forename: Arnulf
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Stenzl
mesh_terms: D002277:Carcinoma / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008297:Male; D012187:Retroperitoneal Space; D013736:Testicular Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*