title: Review of injectable materials for soft tissue augmentation.
abstract: Although a variety of injectable agents are available for soft tissue augmentation, no perfect filler material exists. The advantages and disadvantages of commonly used materials such as bovine collagen have been well documented. However, many newer injectables are still undergoing experimentation to determine their clinical efficacy and long-term safety. This article details recent scientific work to compare injectable materials from the following categories: xenografts (bovine collagen and hyaluronic acid derivatives), autografts (autologous fat, Isolagen, and Autologen), homografts (Dermalogen and Cymetra), and synthetic materials (fluid silicone and Artecoll).
authors.affiliation: Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
authors.forename: Mark R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Homicz
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Watson
mesh_terms: D000273:Adipose Tissue / Q000637:transplantation; D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002417:Cattle; D003094:Collagen / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005145:Face / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D007279:Injections, Subcutaneous; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures; D012828:Silicones / Q000627:therapeutic use
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D012828:Silicones; D003094:Collagen