title: Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging detects more residual ischemia than stress echocardiography following acute myocardial infarction.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This investigation sought to compare the abilities of stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography to detect residual ischemia in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI).
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography are both commonly used to assess patients (patients.) in the immediate post MI period. However, the relative value of these techniques in identifying post MI ischemia remains unclear.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eighteen patients. underwent both dipyridamole radionuclide perfusion imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography on the same day or on consecutive days, 3-7 days following uncomplicated acute MI. Pts. who had an acute percutaneous intervention were excluded. Images were reviewed with clinical information available, but blinded to the opposing modality, for perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities (WMA), and evidence of ischemia (reversible defect(s) on perfusion imaging, worsening WMA on stress echocardiography). Of the 18 patients, 11 subsequently underwent cardiac catheterization.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Perfusion imaging identified defects in 16 (89%) patients, of whom 15 (83% of total) were found to be ischemic. Stress echocardiography identified a fixed wall motion abnormality in 17 (94%) and ischemia in 8 (44%, p < 0.05 compared with perfusion imaging ischemia). Among 11 patients who underwent catheterization, there was a trend towards perfusion imaging identifying more ischemia in the territory of an obstructed (> or = 70%) vessel--100% (11/11) vs. 64% (7/11) for stress echocardiography (p = 0.09).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the immediate post-infarction period, dipyridamole stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging more often shows evidence of residual ischemia than dobutamine stress echocardiography.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467-2490, USA.
authors.forename: Kenneth B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.forename: Michele
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Nanna
authors.forename: V S
authors.initials: VS
authors.lastname: Srinivas
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Del Vecchio
authors.forename: Garet M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.forename: Macduff
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sheehy
authors.forename: David G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: DiMattia
authors.forename: Kimberly D
authors.initials: KD
authors.lastname: Weltman
authors.forename: Mark I
authors.initials: MI
authors.lastname: Travin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000097:blood; D006328:Cardiac Catheterization; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis; D003402:Creatine Kinase / Q000097:blood; D052279:Creatine Kinase, MB Form; D025401:Echocardiography, Stress; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007527:Isoenzymes / Q000097:blood; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000097:blood / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015425:Myocardial Reperfusion; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers; D007527:Isoenzymes; D003402:Creatine Kinase; D052279:Creatine Kinase, MB Form