Intellectual property conundrum for the biological sciences.
Policy regarding academically generated biomedical intellectual property (IP) has been shaped by two important events: the Vannevar Bush report to then President Roosevelt in 1945 and the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. This policy, which vests the intellectual property produced from federally funded biomedical research from the government to the academic institution, was designed to promote technology transfer and thus promote the health of the U.S. economy. However, the policy has led to significant challenges, particularly in implementation. Here it is argued that the difficulties are due to differences in the structure of motivations between biomedical scientists, institutional officials, and private sector entrepreneurs. Understanding these differences may lead to a review of policy with the goal of enhancing technology transfer for the future.
Olds
James L
JL
Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study and the School of Computational Sciences Program in Computational Neurosciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. jolds@gmu.edu
D001690:Biological Science Disciplines / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D016520:Entrepreneurship; D006801:Humans; D018973:Intellectual Property; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D009042:Motivation; D011640:Public Policy; D014481:United States; D014495:Universities