title: Comparative efficacy of two alpha-adrenoreceptor antagonists, doxazosin and alfuzosin, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic enlargement.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare doxazosin and alfuzosin in patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of bladder outlet obstruction.
  
  
  METHODS
  In all, 210 men with LUTS were randomized to receive doxazosin 1-8 mg once daily or alfuzosin 5-10 mg divided in two or three daily doses in a 14-week, multicentre, double-blind, baseline-controlled, dose-titration study. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and maximum urinary flow rate were used to assess the efficacy of the treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At study completion, the mean dose of doxazosin was 6.1 mg/day and alfuzosin 8.8 mg/day. The least squares mean (se) change from baseline in total IPSS was -9.23 (0.6) for doxazosin and -7.45 (0.6) (both P < 0.001) for alfuzosin. The respective mean change from baseline in irritative symptoms was -3.5 (0.2) and -2.8 (0.3) (both P < 0.001). The differences between the treatment groups were statistically significant in favour of doxazosin (total IPSS, P = 0.036; irritative symptoms, P = 0.049). The improvement between groups was also significantly different for postvoid residual urine volume, at -29.19 (8.6) and + 9.59 (8.9) mL for doxazosin and alfuzosin, respectively (P = 0.002). Improvements in mean and maximum urinary flow rates were similar for both treatments, at + 1.5 and + 1.2, and + 2.8 and + 2.5 mL/s, respectively. Doxazosin and alfuzosin were both well tolerated, with most all-cause adverse events reported as mild or moderate.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The mean doses of doxazosin and alfuzosin used in this study were not equipotent. Doxazosin 6.1 mg/day produced significantly greater improvements than alfuzosin 8.8 mg/day in total and irritative urinary symptom scores and postvoid residual urine volume in men with moderate to severe LUTS. Changes in maximum and mean flow rates were comparable. Doxazosin and alfuzosin were both well tolerated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Academic Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. T.M.deReyke@amc.uva.nl
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: de Reijke
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Klarskov
mesh_terms: D000317:Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D017292:Doxazosin / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000503:physiopathology; D011799:Quinazolines / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014555:Urination Disorders / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D014563:Urodynamics
chemical_list: D000317:Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; D011799:Quinazolines; C047638:alfuzosin; D017292:Doxazosin