title: Periprosthetic sepsis.
abstract: The diagnosis of septic implant failure can be difficult to make, yet is imperative for optimal patient outcomes in revision total hip arthroplasty. In most cases, a thorough history and physical examination combined with preoperative laboratory tests and an intraoperative frozen section are sufficient to differentiate septic from aseptic failure. If preoperative laboratory test values are elevated, preoperative aspiration of the hip can be used in selected patients to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of infection. Nuclear medicine studies comprise a second-line investigation to evaluate patients with a painful total hip arthroplasty in whom revision surgery otherwise is not indicated. Intraoperative tissue appearance in combination with intraoperative Gram stains are unreliable for detecting periprosthetic sepsis, and neither is adequate when considered alone for ruling out infection at the time of revision total hip arthroplasty. It is imperative that the surgeon doing revision total hip arthroplasty thoroughly understands the relative utility of preoperative and intraoperative tests used to diagnose periprosthetic sepsis.
authors.affiliation: Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. craigdv@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Craig J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Della Valle
authors.forename: Joseph D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Zuckerman
authors.forename: Paul E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Di Cesare
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D007430:Intraoperative Care; D011300:Preoperative Care; D012086:Reoperation; D018805:Sepsis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology*