title: Photosynthetic responses and N allocation in Douglas-fir needles following a brief pulse of nutrients.
abstract: The temporal distribution of soil nutrients is heterogeneous, and thus the uptake, storage and later remobilization of brief nutrient pulses may be critical for growth in nutrient-limited habitats. We investigated the response of photosynthesis and the major nitrogen (N) fractions in needles of 2-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) seedlings to a 15-day nutrient pulse (containing 250 ppm N). The nutrient pulse (N pulse) was imposed in late July, toward the end of the seedlings' third growing season, and subsequent changes in photosynthesis and needle N fractions were examined over the following 3 months. Needles are sites of photosynthesis and putative storage organs. Thus we tested two hypotheses: (1) N from the N pulse is quickly synthesized from soluble non-protein N into soluble proteins, especially Rubisco, and (2) the N pulse increases photosynthetic rates and thus growth. We also examined an alternative hypothesis that Rubisco functions also as a storage protein, in which case we would predict increases in amount of Rubisco in response to the N pulse without concomitant increases in photosynthesis. Soluble non-protein N was the most dynamic N pool and may have constituted a temporary storage reservoir; however, the quantitative significance of soluble non-protein N is questionable because this pool was at most only 7% of total N. Concentrations of Rubisco were unaffected by the N-pulse treatment and there was little evidence that Rubisco served as a storage protein. Nutrient-pulse seedlings added twice as much dry mass as controls during the 3 months post-treatment (Warren et al. 2003a). Over the same period, the maximum rate of light-saturated photosynthesis (A(max)) declined to low rates in control seedlings, whereas A(max) increased in N-pulse seedlings. Nevertheless, treatment and temporal trends in N and Rubisco content per unit area were poorly related to A(max), and it seems likely that photosynthesis was limited by additional factors, perhaps thylakoid proteins or an inadequate supply of other nutrients.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Forest Biology, Department of Biology, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3020 Stn CSC, Victoria, BC V8N 3N5, Canada. crwarren@unimelb.edu.au
authors.forename: C R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Warren
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Livingston
authors.forename: D H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Turpin
mesh_terms: D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000502:physiology*; D028224:Pseudotsuga / Q000502:physiology*; D014197:Trees / Q000502:physiology*
chemical_list: D009584:Nitrogen