Can concomitant-boost accelerated radiotherapy be adopted as routine treatment for head-and-neck cancers? A 10-year single-institution experience.
OBJECTIVE
Accelerated schedules are effective in overcoming repopulation during radiotherapy (RT) for head-and-neck cancers, but their feasibility is compromised by increased toxicity. The therapeutic ratio may be particularly favorable for 5-week regimens. This study reports the 10-year experience of a single institution in the routine use of concomitant boost RT as standard radical treatment in all but the most favorable stage patients.


METHODS
Between February 1991 and June 2001, 296 patients (mean age, 59 years) were treated with concomitant boost RT either alone (67%) or combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy (33%), with a median tumor dose of 69.9 Gy. Tumors were located in the oropharynx in 52%, hypopharynx in 20%, larynx in 15%, nasopharynx in 7%, and oral cavity in 6%. International Union Against Cancer Stage III-IV disease represented 77% of tumors. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 55 months (range, 10-138 months).


RESULTS
The RT schedule was completed to the prescribed dose in all but 1 patient. Twenty patients (7%) had a treatment interruption (median, 5 days; range, 2-35 days). Grade 3-4 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity was observed in 77% of patients, and nutritional support was required in 110 patients (37%). For all patients, the 5-year actuarial locoregional control and disease-free survival rate was 72% and 61%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, only T and N stage was significantly associated with locoregional control and disease-free survival. Grade 3-4 late toxicity occurred in 14%, mostly bone and cartilage necrosis.


CONCLUSIONS
The present, moderately accelerated, concomitant boost regimen is logistically feasible, causing minimal inconvenience to the technical staff and yielding a high rate of patient compliance. Concomitant chemotherapy administration is feasible provided that patients are carefully selected and supportive care is introduced in a timely fashion. Considering the manageable toxicity and the satisfactory tumor control obtained, this regimen represents a good choice when considering implementation of an altered RT fractionation schedule as standard treatment for head-and-neck cancers.
Allal
Abdelkarim S
AS
Division of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. abdelkarim.alla1@hcuge.ch
Taussky
Daniel
D
Mach
Nicolas
N
Becker
Minerva
M
Bieri
Sabine
S
Dulguerov
Pavel
P
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000532:radiotherapy* / Q000601:surgery; D002423:Cause of Death; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000008:administration & dosage; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D019583:Dose Fractionation, Radiation; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005472:Fluorouracil / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000532:radiotherapy* / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013223:Statistics as Topic
D002945:Cisplatin; D005472:Fluorouracil