title: Equipoise: beyond rehabilitation?
abstract: Challenging the interpretation of Charles Fried's use of "equipoise" presented by Paul Miller and Charles Weijer in a recent issue of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, this commentary argues that Fried was in no way promoting the concept of equipoise. In fact, his key point was that patients have a right to know and to make their own decisions about participation in clinical trials, regardless of equipoise, however it is defined.
authors.affiliation: University of Kansas, Kansas City, USA.
authors.forename: Jerry
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Menikoff
mesh_terms: D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics*; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D018579:Patient Selection / Q000941:ethics; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians; D024382:Professional Role; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000941:ethics*; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations; D035501:Uncertainty