Revised estimates of dimension and exercise variance components in assessment center postexercise dimension ratings.
The authors reanalyzed assessment center (AC) multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices containing correlations among postexercise dimension ratings (PEDRs) reported by F. Lievens and J. M. Conway (2001). Unlike F. Lievens and J. M. Conway, who used a correlated dimension-correlated uniqueness model, we used a different set of confirmatory-factor-analysis-based models (1-dimension-correlated Exercise and 1-dimension-correlated uniqueness models) to estimate dimension and exercise variance components in AC PEDRs. Results of reanalyses suggest that, consistent with previous narrative reviews, exercise variance components dominate over dimension variance components after all. Implications for AC construct validity and possible redirections of research on the validity of ACs are discussed.
Lance
Charles E
CE
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA. clance@uga.edu
Lambert
Tracy A
TA
Gewin
Amanda G
AG
Lievens
Filip
F
Conway
James M
JM
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010560:Personnel Selection; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results