Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Pro.
Both EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG), with a time resolution of 1 ms or less, provide unique neurophysiologic data not obtainable by other neuroimaging techniques. MEG and EEG have often been compared to each other now although the two are complementary. Now that MEG has emerged as a mature clinical technology, it is worthwhile to compare the relative strengths of each for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity and to describe the strengths of MEG relative to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity. The sources of MEG and EEG signals will first be reviewed. Issues relevant to solving the forward problem and the inverse problem in MEG and EEG will be addressed followed by a comparison of research concerning the detection and localization of interictal epileptiform activity by MEG and EEG. The emphasis will be upon techniques and software routinely used in clinical applications but some emerging areas of MEG research which are entering clinical practice will also be reviewed.


CONCLUSIONS
MEG is a new noninvasive neurophysiologic technique which provides unique information for the clinical evaluation of patients with epilepsy, revealing aspects of neuronal function that previously could only be obtained by invasive EEG monitoring, and giving a new window for research of neuronal activity.
Barkley
Gregory L
GL
Neuromagnetism Laboratory, Henry Ford Comprehensive Epilepsy Program, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. barkley@neuro.hfh.edu
D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000592:standards*; D004827:Epilepsy / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D015225:Magnetoencephalography / Q000592:standards*