Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity.
In two experiments, we examined the influence of situation-evoking stimuli on the resolution of lexical ambiguity. In Experiment 1, we examined situation-evoking stimuli at an early NP position. Readers were asked to establish whether specific entities were likely to participate as agents in contextually defined situations. Naming latencies demonstrated that defined situations headed by likely agents evoked a domain of reference that included only the situation-appropriate meaning of a targeted lexical ambiguity. In contrast, defined situations headed by unlikely agents evoked a domain of reference that did not include either meaning of the intended ambiguous word. In Experiment 2, we examined situation-evoking stimuli at a later direct object position. The specificity of the theme/patient role filler was manipulated, where the linguistic expressions were either specific or general with respect to a given contextual situation. The results showed that contexts with specific situation-evoking stimuli were rated as strongly biased and provided a domain of reference for the immediate resolution of lexical ambiguity, whereas contexts with nonspecific role fillers were rated as ambiguous and provided a domain of reference that was supportive of both meanings of an ambiguous word. The results were discussed within a contextual-feature-sensitive model of language processing.
Vu
Hoang
H
Department of Psychology, Saint Mary's College of California, Moraga, California 94575, USA. hvu@stmarys-ca.edu
Kellas
George
G
Petersen
Eric
E
Metcalf
Kim
K
D001244:Association; D006801:Humans; D008016:Life Change Events; D011930:Reaction Time; D014792:Visual Acuity; D014825:Vocabulary