title: Does rapid atrial pacing terminate atrial fibrillation? A comparison of laboratory and device termination studies.
abstract: Atrial fibrillation is understood to be a re-entrant arrhythmia and for many years electrophysiologists have attempted to pace-terminate the rhythm. Several studies have demonstrated that an excitable gap is present during atrial fibrillation and that the capture of small amounts of atrial tissue is possible. Early attempts to terminate atrial fibrillation however were unsuccessful. The rapid development of pacemaker and defibrillator technology has provided an exciting new direction for the treatment of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Results from studies of the effectiveness of atrial anti-tachycardia pacing algorithms have suggested that 50% of atrial arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) can be pace-terminated. These findings conflict with data from the electrophysiology laboratory where atrial fibrillation has yet to be convincingly terminated. In this review, the current literature is discussed and possible reasons for this discrepancy are proposed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiac Rhythm Management, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. mitcharj@doctors.org.uk
authors.forename: Andrew R J
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Mitchell
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sulke
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001281:Atrial Fibrillation / Q000517:prevention & control*; D002304:Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable; D006801:Humans; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial