Selected characteristics of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate surface roughness, hardness and wear resistance of an Ormocer (Admira), polymerized by a plasma arc system. A secondary objective was to investigate two placement technique bulk or incremental layers.


METHODS
Blocks from Admira and Amelogen (a microhybrid composite) were prepared in cylinders, 3 mm in diameter, and 2 and 5 mm in thickness (bulk or incrementally placed) and polymerized by a plasma arc and a conventional light system. Surface roughness measurements were taken by a Surface Profilometer on the top of the specimens. Vickers hardness measurements, with a load of 600mN were taken on the top and bottom of 2 mm and top, intermediate and bottom of 5 mm thick specimens. For the wear test, specimes (8 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) of Admira, Amelogen and amalgam were tested in a ball-on design, by circular movements of the antagonist (alumina ball; diameter 10 mm) under 10 N load. For the statistical evaluation of the results of surface roughness, microhardness and wear test; a paired samples t-test and Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test, were performed.


RESULTS
Admira showed highest hardness values in all polymerization types at the top surface and this was statistically significant (p < 0.05). These highest hardness values were obtained with conventional polymerization (81.84 +/- 1.167 VHN). Meanwhile, the wear resistance of Admira was found to be higher than Amelogen (Wd(admira) = 0.024 +/- 0.00149 mm3; Wd(amelogen) = 0.032 +/- 0.00075 mm3). However, Admira demonstrated the highest surface roughness value compared to Amelogen, with plasma arc 5 s (0.65 +/- 0.023 microm). Amelogen was found to have the lowest surface roughness value with conventional 40 s (0.45 +/- 0.012 microm).


CONCLUSIONS
The results indicated that Ormocer, which was developed by Ormocer technology, demonstrated higher microhardness and wear resistance when compared to a hybrid composite; however, the polishability of Ormocer needs further investigation. Also the selection of visible light activated composite resins exhibited higher surface microhardness values when polymerized with conventional rather than with plasma arc.
Tagtekin
Dilek Arslantunali
DA
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Marmara University, Izzet Aksalur Cad. Konaklar Mah, 10/A Daire:1, Yenilevent, Istanbul 80620, Turkey.
Yanikoglu
Funda Caliskan
FC
Bozkurt
Funda Ozturk
FO
Kologlu
Burcu
B
Sur
Haydar
H
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002516:Ceramics / Q000528:radiation effects; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000528:radiation effects; D019554:Dental Restoration Wear; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006244:Hardness; D008027:Light; D008422:Materials Testing; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000528:radiation effects; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D063225:Organically Modified Ceramics; D012821:Silanes / Q000528:radiation effects; D012833:Siloxanes / Q000528:radiation effects; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013499:Surface Properties / Q000528:radiation effects; D014978:Xenon
D003188:Composite Resins; D008689:Methacrylates; D063225:Organically Modified Ceramics; D012821:Silanes; D012833:Siloxanes; C479084:admira; C106662:amelogen; D014978:Xenon