title: Toxicity assessment of common xenobiotic compounds on municipal activated sludge: comparison between respirometry and Microtox.
abstract: The toxicity of four xenobiotic compounds 3,5-dichlorophenol, formaldehyde, 4-nitrophenol and dichloromethane, representative of industrial wastewater contaminants was evaluated by a simple respirometric procedure set up on the basis of OECD Method 209 and by the Microtox bioassay. Very good reproducibility was observed for both methods, the variation coefficients being in the range of 2-10% for the respirometric procedure and 6-15% for Microtox, values that can be considered very good for a biological method. Comparison of EC(50) data obtained with the two methods shows that in both cases 3,5-dichlorophenol is more toxic than other compounds investigated and dichloromethane has a very low toxicity value. Intermediate EC(50) values were found for the two other chemicals, formaldehyde and 4-nitrophenol. Moreover, the Microtox EC(50) values are generally lower (except for dichloromethane) than the respirometric ones: these differences could be explained by the fact that the Microtox method uses a pure culture of marine species and, therefore, should not necessarily be expected to behave like a community of activated sludge bacteria. In conclusion, both methods can be usefully applied for toxicity detection in wastewater treatment plants but it is advisable to take into account that Microtox is more sensitive than respirometry in estimating the acute toxicity effect on the biomass operating in the plant.
authors.affiliation: Istituto di Ricerca Sulle Acque, CNR Via F. De Blasio, 5 Bari 70123, Italy.
authors.forename: Giuseppina
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ricco
authors.forename: M C M Concetta
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Tomei
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ramadori
authors.forename: Giuseppe
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Laera
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D001681:Biological Assay; D018533:Biomass; D002733:Chlorophenols / Q000633:toxicity; D002947:Cities; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D005557:Formaldehyde / Q000633:toxicity; D008752:Methylene Chloride / Q000633:toxicity; D009596:Nitrophenols / Q000633:toxicity; D010100:Oxygen / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012722:Sewage / Q000737:chemistry*; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014865:Waste Disposal, Fluid; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000633:toxicity; D015262:Xenobiotics / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*
chemical_list: D002733:Chlorophenols; D009596:Nitrophenols; D012722:Sewage; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D015262:Xenobiotics; D005557:Formaldehyde; D008752:Methylene Chloride; C116190:3,5-dichlorophenol; D010100:Oxygen; C024836:4-nitrophenol