title: Urban regeneration and mental health.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an urban regeneration project on mental health.
  
  
  METHODS
  A longitudinal study was made with 22-month follow-up in a Single Regeneration Budget area, and matched control area in South Manchester. A total of 1344 subjects responded to a postal questionnaire survey. The main outcome measures were GHQ12 (mental health) status, MANSA (Life satisfaction), and GP use.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mental health outcome in the index and control areas showed no improvement over time. Health satisfaction declined slightly in the index compared to the control area. GP use was unchanged. Restricted opportunities, a variable closely related to mental health, were not removed by the urban regeneration initiative.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The urban regeneration initiative may have had little impact because it failed to address the concerns of local residents and failed to remove restricted opportunities, which appeared to be the key factor. A longer follow-up period may be required to demonstrate an effect.
authors.affiliation: Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, The David Goldberg Centre De Crespigny Park, 032, London SE5 8AF, UK.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Huxley
authors.forename: Sherrill
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Leese
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gately
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rogers
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Robson
mesh_terms: D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D008603:Mental Health; D012923:Social Class; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014506:Urban Renewal