Editing trains of action potentials from multi-electrode arrays.
When recording from multi-electrode arrays, only a short period around the time of a threshold crossing is generally saved for later analysis. Then, waveforms are often sorted automatically to identify templates of spikes from individual neurons near an electrode. As spikes sum from different neurons and noise is present, some spikes may be missed and others erroneously accepted. This paper describes methods for identifying and correcting errors in recorded spike trains to recover the pattern of spikes from each neuron as faithfully as possible. These methods are complementary to, but distinct from methods to reconstruct waveforms that arise from summation of individual templates that overlap one another. Our methods are based on the local statistics of the firing rates or inter-spike intervals and the methods work best for neurons that fire regularly (small standard deviation relative to the mean interval). First, we test whether accepting more spikes, whose waveforms are close to the templates that have been identified, will increase the regularity or smoothness of the firing rates. Then, after accepting spikes that increase regularity, we test whether individual intervals are sufficiently longer (or shorter) than their neighbors to identify spikes that have been omitted (or accepted) erroneously. The methods are tested on simulated spike trains, where spikes have been inserted or deleted at random, and on spike trains recorded from multi-electrode arrays in dorsal root ganglia of cats walking on a treadmill.
Stein
Richard B
RB
Centre for Neuroscience and Department of Physiology, 513 Heritage Medical Research Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2S2. Richard.stein@ualberta.ca
Weber
Douglas J
DJ
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D004566:Electrodes; D005727:Ganglia, Spinal / Q000502:physiology; D008959:Models, Neurological