title: Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.
abstract: 18F-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) has been evaluated in breast cancer for the characterisation of primary tumours, lymph node staging and the follow-up of patients after surgery, chemotherapy and/or external radiotherapy. In contrast to both the low sensitivity and moderate specificity of FDG PET in the initial detection and characterisation of breast cancer and the low lesion-based sensitivity for lymph node staging, the results from use of FDG PET in re-staging breast cancer patients are very promising. A major advantage of FDG PET imaging compared with conventional imaging is that it screens the entire patient for local recurrence, lymph node metastases and distant metastases during a single whole-body examination using a single injection of activity, with a reported average sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 77%, respectively. In most studies the sensitivity of FDG PET is higher than that of a combination of conventional imaging methods. Limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer patients include the relatively low detection rate of bone metastases, especially in case of the sclerotic subtype, and the relatively high rate of false positive results. The rather low specificity of FDG PET can be improved/increased by utilising combined anatomical-molecular imaging techniques, such as a PET/CT tomograph. First results using PET/CT imaging in the follow-up of breast cancer patients demonstrate increased specificity compared with FDG PET alone. Both imaging modalities, however, offer to detect recurrent and metastatic breast cancer disease at an early stage and thus continue to demonstrate the efficacy of molecular imaging in patient management, despite the limited therapeutic options in recurrent and metastatic breast cancer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrinology, PET/CT Center, LKH Klagenfurt, St. Veiterstrasse 47, 9020 Klagenfurt, Austria. peter.lind@lkh-klu.at
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lind
authors.forename: Isabel
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Igerc
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Beyer
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Reinprecht
authors.forename: Klaus
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hausegger
mesh_terms: D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000628:therapy*; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic; D005260:Female; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; D006801:Humans; D009367:Neoplasm Staging / Q000379:methods; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011379:Prognosis; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18