Effect of various distal ring-block configurations on the biomechanical properties of circular external skeletal fixators for use in dogs and cats.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate mediolateral, axial, torsional, and craniocaudal bending behavior of 6 distal ring-block configurations commonly used to stabilize short juxta-articular bone segments in small animals.


METHODS
8 circular external skeletal fixator constructs of each of 6 distal ring-block configurations. The distal ring-block configurations were composed of combinations of complete rings, incomplete rings, and drop wires.


METHODS
Constructs were nondestructively loaded in axial compression, craniocaudal bending, mediolateral bending, and torsional loading by use of a materials testing machine. Gap stiffness was determined by use of the resultant load displacement curve.


RESULTS
Circular external skeletal fixator configurations and constructs significantly affected gap stiffness in all testing modes. Within each loading mode, gap stiffness was significantly different among most configurations. In general, complete ring configurations were significantly stiffer than similar incomplete ring configurations, and addition of a drop wire to a configuration significantly increased stiffness of that configuration.


CONCLUSIONS
When regional anatomic structures permit, the use of complete ring configurations is preferred over incomplete ring configurations. When incomplete ring configurations are used, the addition of a drop wire is recommended.
Cross
Alan R
AR
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences and the Center for Veterinary Sports Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Lewis
Daniel D
DD
Rigaud
Steve
S
Rapoff
Andrew J
AJ
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002415:Cats; D004285:Dogs; D016267:External Fixators / Q000592:standards* / Q000662:veterinary*; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000662:veterinary*