Evidence for detection of one duration sample and default responding to other duration samples by pigeons may result from an artifact of retention-test ambiguity.
S. C. Gaitan and J. T. Wixted (2000) proposed that when pigeons are trained on a conditional discrimination to associate 1 duration sample with 1 comparison and 2 other duration samples with a 2nd comparison, they detect only the single duration, and on trials involving either of the 2 other duration samples, they respond to the other comparison by default. In 2 experiments, the authors show instead that pigeons lend to treat the retention intervals (such as those used by Gaitan and Wixted) as intertrial intervals, and thus, they tend to treat all trials with a delay as 0-s sample trials. The authors tested this hypothesis by showing that divergent retention functions do not appear when the retention interval is discriminably different from the intertrial interval.
Zentall
Thomas R
TR
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA. zentall@uky.edu
Klein
Emily D
ED
Singer
Rebecca A
RA
D000818:Animals; D016477:Artifacts; D001245:Association Learning; D010856:Columbidae; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D013998:Time Perception; D014163:Transfer, Psychology