Retraction policies of high-impact biomedical journals.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose is to review the issue of retraction in the scientific literature and to examine the policies on retraction of major biomedical journals.


METHODS
The historical background of this issue was investigated through a literature search. The Instructions to Authors of 122 major biomedical journals were reviewed for evidence of a policy on the retraction of articles. Editors of those journals with no mention of retraction in their Instructions to Authors were contacted by email and/or postal mail.


RESULTS
Sixty-two percent of the journals investigated did not post or report having a policy on issuing retractions. Only twenty-one (18%) did. The remainder did not post any policy and did not respond to inquiries.


CONCLUSIONS
Including policies in Instructions to Authors relating to the principled conduct of research and publication will improve the ethical environment in which the scientific community works.
Atlas
Michel C
MC
Kornhauser Health Sciences Library, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. mcatlas@louisville.edu
D001319:Authorship; D035843:Biomedical Research; D002983:Clinical Competence; D006801:Humans; D018156:Journalism, Medical / Q000592:standards*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D024382:Professional Role; D012180:Retraction of Publication as Topic; D014481:United States