title: Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Effects of weight and shape on attractiveness ratings of female line drawings by restrained and nonrestrained eaters.
abstract: This study tested the differences between restrained and nonrestrained eaters' attractiveness perceptions of female line drawings, of their own figures, and the ideal female figure. Female line drawings varied systematically in body weight and in waist and hip circumference. Forty-six female undergraduate students, 23 nonrestrainers and 23 restrainers, rated stimuli in attractiveness, identified the figure which best represented their own body type (PAF), and the ideal body figure (IF) according to the Restraint Scale [RS; Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1980). Restrained eating. In: A. Stunkard (Ed.), Obesity (pp. 208-225). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders]. Restrainers did not generally differ from nonrestrainers in attractiveness ratings or in their choice of IF. However, differences between IF and PAF were larger in restrainers than in nonrestrainers because restrainers chose PAFs with larger hips than nonrestrainers did. This difference between the restraint groups was independent of between-group differences in hip size. This discrepancy between IF and PAF may contribute to the restrainers' motivation to diet.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H 4JI. cforestall@monell.org
authors.forename: Catherine A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Forestell
authors.forename: Tara M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Humphrey
authors.forename: Sherry H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Stewart
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001504:Beauty; D001828:Body Image; D001835:Body Weight; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012928:Social Desirability; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires