Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
A growing number of patients, mainly cisplatin-pretreated, require second-line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but the optimal treatment and appropriate criteria for patient selection have not been defined yet. A second-line phase II study was conducted in cisplatin-pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC to evaluate the activity and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel. Fifty-three consecutive NSCLC patients (9 stage IIIA-B, 44 stage IV) progressing after one front line cisplatin-based chemotherapy were enrolled. Previous treatment with taxanes was not allowed. Patients with stage III were also pretreated with thoracic radiotherapy. Weekly paclitaxel was administered as 1-h infusion at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) for three weeks with one week off, for a maximum of four courses. All patients were assessable for response, toxicity and survival. A complete response was observed in one case, partial response in 7, for an overall response rate (RR) of 15%, (95% Cl = 5-25%). Stable disease (SD) was registered in 11 patients, for an overall clinical benefit (CB = RR + SD) of 36% (95% Cl = 23-49%). Toxicity was mild, with G3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in 6 and 2% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicities were negligible. No significant correlation between patient or treatment-related variable and RR was observed. CB was significantly higher in patients with non-squamous histology (P = 0.03) and no progression within 4 months of first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy (P = 0.007). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months in responders and 4 months in pts with SD. PFS was significantly related to good performance status (PS) (P = 0.002) and non-squamous histology (P = 0.004). In conclusion, weekly paclitaxel has acceptable palliative activity and excellent tolerance in cisplatin-pretreated patients. Patients with PS 0-1, non-squamous histology and with no progression within 4 months of first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy seem more likely to benefit from this treatment.
Ceresoli
Giovanni Luca
GL
Department of Oncology, Scientific Institute San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60-20132 Milan, Italy. ceresoli.giovanni@hsr.it
Gregorc
Vanesa
V
Cordio
Stefano
S
Bencardino
Katia Bruna
KB
Schipani
Stefano
S
Cozzarini
Cesare
C
Bordonaro
Roberto
R
Villa
Eugenio
E
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology; D002945:Cisplatin / Q000494:pharmacology; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D019008:Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017239:Paclitaxel / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; D017239:Paclitaxel; D002945:Cisplatin