title: Nutritional screening of older people in a sub-acute care facility in Australia and its relation to discharge outcomes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the prevalence of under-nutrition using brief screening methods and to determine the relation between these results and (1) those of a more standard nutritional assessment and (2) discharge outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective study.
  
  
  METHODS
  65 (21 males) patients older than 65 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sub-acute care facility.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Mini Nutritional Assessment, standard nutritional assessment, 'rapid screen' and discharge outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The prevalence of under-nutrition was high, ranging from 35.4% to 43.1%, depending on the screening method used. Compared to the standard nutritional assessment the 'rapid screen' consisting of (1) body mass index <22 kg/m(2); and/or (2) reported weight loss of >7.5% over the previous 3 months and the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (at risk subjects (46% of total) further evaluated using standard nutritional assessment) had sensitivities of 78.6 and 89.5% and specificities of 97.3 and 87.5% respectively in diagnosing under-nutrition. Under-nourished patients as identified by the standard nutritional assessment (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017), the two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment process (50.0% (under-nourished) versus 21.6% (nourished); P = 0.017) and the rapid screen (56.5% (under-nourished) versus 21.4% (nourished); P = 0.004) were more likely to be discharged to an acute hospital or an accommodation with increased support (poor discharge outcomes) than nourished patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  All screening methods identified patients more likely to have a poor discharge outcome. The highly specific but less sensitive 'rapid screen' may be the best method in facilities with limited resources as it can be easily incorporated into nursing/medical admissions and avoids biochemical investigations in all patients. The more sensitive two-tiered Mini Nutritional Assessment is better if resources permit.
authors.affiliation: Department of Geriatric and Rehabilitation Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia. rvisvanathan@ozemail.com.au
authors.forename: Renuka
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Visvanathan
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Penhall
authors.forename: Ian
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Chapman
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening; D009748:Nutrition Disorders / Q000453:epidemiology*; D009752:Nutritional Status; D010351:Patient Discharge; D015995:Prevalence; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D016896:Treatment Outcome