Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury.
A group with closed head injury was compared to neurologically intact controls regarding the referential cohesion and logical coherence of narrative production. A sample of six stories was obtained with tasks of cartoon-elicited story-telling and auditory-oral retelling. We found deficits in the clinical group with respect to referential cohesion, logical coherence, and accuracy of narration. The occurrence of deficits depended on the condition of narrative production and, to some extent, on the particular story used. The primary implications of this study pertain to the attention given by researchers to the feature of discourse production being studied and processing demands of the task.
Davis
G Albyn
GA
Communication Disorders, Arnold House, University of Massachusetts, Box 30410, Amherst, MA 01003-0410, USA. albyn@comdis.umass.edu
Coelho
Carl A
CA
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D016489:Head Injuries, Closed / Q000150:complications*; D006801:Humans; D007806:Language Disorders / Q000209:etiology*; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D033262:Narration; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric