Recycling in a megacity.
In the aftermath of the 9/11 disaster, Mayor Bloomberg of New York City unveiled an aggressive budget plan that included the temporary suspension of glass and plastics recycling. This was considered by many to be anti-environmental, but the results of this study show that for lack of markets, even at zero or negative prices, nearly 90% of the plastic and glass set aside by thoughtful New Yorkers was transported to materials recovery facilities (MRFs) and from there to landfills. Sending bales of plastics to landfills is not limited to New York City. It is an environmental paradox that the United States is digging up new oil fields in pristine areas and, at the same time, continues to convert greenfields to brownfields by burying nearly 20 million tons of plastic fuel annually. The study also determined that at the present rate of source separation, estimated to be less than 30% of the available recyclables in 1999, building large, modern MRFs may increase substantially the rate of New York City recycling and also allow single-stream collection of commingled recyclables, as is done in Phoenix, AZ. Single-stream collection simplifies separation at the source by citizens and increases the amount of collected recyclables. Also, because collection represents a large fraction of the costs of waste management, it may have a significant economic advantage.
Themelis
Nickolas J
NJ
Earth Engineering Center, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA. njt1@columbia.edu
Todd
Claire E
CE
D003132:Commerce; D003256:Community Participation; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004777:Environment; D005898:Glass; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D009519:New York City; D010969:Plastics
D010969:Plastics