Comparison of coding capabilities of Type I and Type II neurons.
We consider the dependence of information transfer by neurons on the Type I vs. Type II classification of their dynamics. Our computational study is based on Type I and II implementations of the Morris-Lecar model. It mainly concerns neurons, such as those in the auditory or electrosensory system, which encode band-limited amplitude modulations of a periodic carrier signal, and which fire at random cycles yet preferred phases of this carrier. We first show that the Morris-Lecar model with additive broadband noise ("synaptic noise") can exhibit such firing patterns with either Type I or II dynamics, with or without amplitude modulations of the carrier. We then compare the encoding of band-limited random amplitude modulations for both dynamical types. The comparison relies on a parameter calibration that closely matches firing rates for both models across a range of parameters. In the absence of synaptic noise, Type I performs slightly better than Type II, and its performance is optimal for perithreshold signals. However, Type II performs well over a slightly larger range of inputs, and this range lies mostly in the subthreshold region. Further, Type II performs marginally better than Type I when synaptic noise, which yields more realistic baseline firing patterns, is present in both models. These results are discussed in terms of the tuning and phase locking properties of the models with deterministic and stochastic inputs.
St-Hilaire
Martin
M
Department of Physics, University of Ottawa, 150 Louis Pasteur, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1N 6N5.
Longtin
André
A
D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D001330:Electronic Data Processing; D004594:Electrophysiology; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009474:Neurons / Q000145:classification* / Q000502:physiology*; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics; D013269:Stochastic Processes; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology*; D009435:Synaptic Transmission / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors