title: A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial.
abstract: We selected randomly a consecutive series of 162 patients requiring hip replacement to receive either a cementless, hemispherical, modular, titanium acetabular cup or a cemented, all-polyethylene cup. These replacements were performed by two surgeons in four general hospitals. The same surgical technique was used and a 26 mm metal-head femoral component was used in every case. After exclusions, 115 hips were studied for differences in rates of wear and osteolysis. The mean clinical follow-up was eight years and the mean radiological follow-up, 6.5 years. The cementless cups wore at a mean rate of 0.15 mm per year and the cemented cups at 0.07 mm per year. This difference was significant (p < 0.0001). Our findings in this mid-term study suggest that cementless cups wear more than cemented cups.
authors.affiliation: Frankston Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: McCombe
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D000077:Acetabulum / Q000601:surgery; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D001843:Bone Cements; D005260:Female; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010014:Osteolysis / Q000209:etiology; D020959:Polyethylene; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography
chemical_list: D001843:Bone Cements; D020959:Polyethylene