title: [What is the role of compulsory ECT therapy today?].
abstract: Electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) has been effective for years, but it arouses opposition among patients and especially in the general public. ECT treatment is limited and compared to other medical treatment it is considered exceptional by the law, regulations and treatment personnel. A question arises as to the position of therapists regarding compulsory ECT treatment. A questionnaire was sent on this subject to all the units utilizing ECT in Israel. Opinions ranged from complete negation of compulsory ECT, to regarding such treatment as possible in cases when the patient is compulsorily hospitalized and/or when the patient's guardian supports this treatment. The authors' opinion is that the Law of Patients' Rights regarding special treatment when the patient is in extreme danger must be followed. The law requires that three physicians agree to the treatment, and compulsory treatment is no longer applicable when the danger passes. ECT treatment is important and imperative in certain conditions, especially conditions endangering patients' lives. In these conditions the law provides the authority to physicians to make decisions regarding treatment.
authors.affiliation: Lev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University. ymelamed@lev-hasharon.co.il
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Melamed
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Altmark
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Alfici
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Or
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Zipris
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bzura
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bleich
mesh_terms: D001294:Attitude to Health; D004565:Electroconvulsive Therapy / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007557:Israel; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires