Nursing documentation of telephone communication with physicians in community nursing homes.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to describe the nursing documentation of telephone communication with physicians in community nursing homes.


METHODS
We conducted a prospective observational study evaluating nursing documentation of all telephone calls to one physician group.


METHODS
We studied two proprietary community nursing homes in Baltimore, Maryland.


METHODS
Data were collected by physicians at the time of each call regarding the time, day, nursing facility, reason for the call, and any orders given. Calls were also categorized as to whether documentation was necessary by defined criteria. The nursing home charts were then reviewed for the presence of documentation of 1) the issue that prompted the call, 2) physician's participation in the matter, and 3) any orders given by the physician. The relationships between the characteristics of the telephone calls and the rates of documentation were then analyzed.


RESULTS
There were 248 calls from the two nursing homes during the 2-month study period. Nursing documentation of the issue that prompted the call was present for 80% of total calls. This documentation was more likely to be present with calls for change of patient status and notification of laboratory/radiograph results compared with calls for other issues (117 of 125 [94%] vs. 57 of 63 [90%] vs. 24 of 60 [40%], respectively; chi(2) = 78.3, P <0.0001). Calls that were categorized as "documentation necessary" by the Medical Director were more likely to be documented than calls that were not (132 of 150 [88%] vs. 9 of 35 [26%], respectively; chi(2) = 60.8, P <0.001). Of the 198 calls with any form of documentation, specific mention of physician participation in the communication was present in 89% of these calls. This documentation of physician participation was more likely to be present with calls for laboratory/radiograph notification than with calls for change of patient status or calls for other reasons (57 of 57 [100%] vs. 99 of 117 [85%] vs. 20 of 24 [83%], respectively; chi(2) = 10.0, P = 0.007). Physicians indicated that orders were given during 69% of calls, but orders were only documented for 79% of these interactions. No characteristics of the call were associated with likelihood of order documentation.


CONCLUSIONS
In this study, documentation of issues that lead to telephone calls to physicians was not always present. Similarly, orders given by the physician were absent over 20% of the time. Nurses, physicians, and facilities should develop efficient and routine strategies to optimize rates of documentation of telephone communication with physicians.
McNabney
Matthew K
MK
Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 55605 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. mmcnabne@jhmi.edu
Andersen
Ross E
RE
Bennett
Richard G
RG
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015142:Baltimore; D004282:Documentation / Q000592:standards*; D006269:Health Facilities, Proprietary / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015401:Nursing Administration Research; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009737:Nursing Records / Q000592:standards*; D010347:Patient Care Planning / Q000592:standards; D019555:Physician-Nurse Relations; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013689:Telephone / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013997:Time Factors