Auxiliary technologies related to transport and communication for obstetric emergencies.
OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence on appropriate transport and communications technologies for obstetrical referrals in developing countries.


METHODS
Review of articles published in peer-reviewed journals and gray literature, supplemented by email and telephone consultations with key informants and field programmers.


RESULTS
A wide range of transportation options have been attempted. Initial approaches--such as those relying on ambulances owned and operated by health systems--have evolved into recommendations that emphasize community-based solutions. There are fewer options within the realm of communications technologies, and the recommendations are more consistent. Public health researchers are only beginning to evaluate the cost and effectiveness of different options.


CONCLUSIONS
One of the greatest barriers to effective use of transport and communications for obstetric emergencies is the short time interval necessary for action, which limits options for obstetric referrals more than for other medical referrals. Although evidence is still scarce, experience suggests that motorized transport is likely to be the most acceptable and effective transportation option. More sophisticated communications technologies such as cell phones are both practical and effective, and are increasingly becoming the technologies of choice for low-resource settings.
Krasovec
K
K
Program for Appropriate Technology in Health, Washington, DC, USA. kkrasovec@path-dc.org
D003142:Communication; D003906:Developing Countries; D004638:Emergency Treatment / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006801:Humans; D008427:Maternal Health Services; D013677:Medical Laboratory Science; D008507:Medically Underserved Area; D011247:Pregnancy; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D014187:Transportation of Patients