American pragmatism as a guide for professional ethical conduct for engineers.
The ethical choices faced by engineers today are increasingly complex. Competing and conflicting ethical demands from clients, communities, employees, and personal objectives combine to suggest that engineers employ ethical approaches that are adaptive yet grounded in three concrete professional circumstances: first, that engineers apply unique professional skills in the service of a client, subject to protecting the public interest; second, that engineers advance the state of knowledge of their professional field through reflection, research, and sharing experience in journals and conferences, and third, that they develop new professionals by active mentoring. This paper examines five features of American pragmatism and suggests that its emphasis on specific, context-based ethical decision making can assist engineers in a postmodern setting. In particular, it considers the venues of interpersonal ethical choices, institutional ethical conflicts, and social choices that have ethical components. Pragmatism suggests that in such a complex ethical climate, there is a need for the co-evolution of judgment and action, for individual reflective judgment in particular situations, and for ceasing to search for a single, immutable principle for ethical choice.
Emison
Gerald Andrews
GA
Department of Political Science, Mississippi State University, MS 39762, USA. emison@ps.msstate.edu
D004738:Engineering / Q000941:ethics*; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D008611:Mentors; D011361:Professional Competence; D028743:Professional Misconduct / Q000941:ethics*; D014481:United States