Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT.
The authors argue that the Implicit Association Test (IAT; A.G. Greenwald, D.E. McGhee, & J.L.K. Schwartz, 1998) can be contaminated by associations that do not contribute to one's evaluation of an attitude object and thus do not become activated when one encounters the object but that are nevertheless available in memory. The authors propose a variant of the IAT that reduces the contamination of these "extrapersonal associations." Consistent with the notion that the traditional version of the IAT is affected by society's negative portrayal of minority groups, the "personalized" IAT revealed relatively less racial prejudice among Whites in Experiments 1 and 2. In Experiments 3 and 4, the personalized IAT correlated more strongly with explicit measures of attitudes and behavioral intentions than did the traditional IAT. The feasibility of disentangling personal and extrapersonal associations is discussed.
Olson
Michael A
MA
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, 43210-1222, USA. olson.127@osu.edu
Fazio
Russell H
RH
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001244:Association; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011287:Prejudice; D011593:Psychology, Social; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011930:Reaction Time; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012938:Social Perception; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014936:Word Association Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*