Stimulus array onset as a preparatory signal in attentional selection.
Warning signals enhance psychomotor performance by optimising preparation for the arrival of an event. Recent evidence, however, suggests that a warning signal can also disrupt attentional preparation by interfering with the process of preparing. It was hypothesised that a warning signal consisting of a change to the task-relevant items (array onset) may be more effective than a traditional warning signal consisting of the arrival, or removal, of a bar-cue which is independent of the task array. In three experiments array onset was a more effective warning signal than the bar-cue because reaction times were significantly faster without an increase in errors. In addition, an auditory warning signal resulted in faster reaction time than the bar-cue but in performance equivalent to that with an onset warning signal. Thus, the superiority of an auditory warning signal, reported by Davis and Green, was not found, when the interference of the visual warning signal with preparation was reduced. These results suggest that a visual warning signal consisting of a change to the stimulus array is more effective than an event independent from the stimulus array.
Rodway
Paul
P
Division of Psychology, School of Social and Health Sciences, University of Abertay Dundee, Scotland, UK. p.rodway@tay.ac.uk
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D014796:Visual Perception