Contributions of thinking styles to vocational purpose beyond self-rated abilities.
The present study predicted vocational purpose from thinking styles, a construct at the interface of intelligence and personality. 233 students majoring in history and computer science from a large research-oriented university in the People's Republic of China completed the Thinking Styles Inventory and the Iowa Vocational Purpose Inventory. The participants also rated their own analytical, creative, and practical abilities. In general, results indicated that thinking styles contributed to vocational purpose beyond self-rated abilities. Specifically, the more creativity-generating and complex thinking styles tended to contribute positively to vocational purpose, whereas the more conforming and simplistic thinking styles tended to contribute negatively to vocational purpose. This article points to the need theoretically for integrating the construct of thinking style into the definition of differential psychology. Practical data argue for a collaborative working relationship between teachers and vocational counselors in institutions of higher education.
Zhang
Li-Fang
LF
Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong. lfzhang@hkucc.hku.hk
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001076:Aptitude; D044466:Asian People / Q000523:psychology; D002681:China / Q000208:ethnology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007360:Intelligence; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009790:Occupations; D010551:Personality; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D020377:Self Efficacy; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology*; D013850:Thinking; D014830:Vocational Guidance