title: Sources of comfort and change in this "would-be" science.
abstract: Responds to comments made by numerous authors (see records 2004-14303-014, 2004-14303-015, and 2004-14303-016) on the current author's original article (see record 2003-05602-002), which presented an account of why psychologists have almost continuously invoked Kuhn since the 1970s to justify a wide array of the discipline's historical developments and epistemological proclivities. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved)
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, US. edl@wjh.harvard
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Driver-Linn
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000639:trends*; D012586:Science