Enteric conversion after bladder drained pancreas transplantation experience of 14 cases.
The method of exocrine diversion in pancreas allograft continues to be controversial due to the advantages versus disadvantages of bladder versus enteric techniques. Bladder drainage (BD) exposes the patient to urological and metabolic problems that may require conversion to enteric drainage (ED). The purpose of this study was to review our initial experience of conversion from BD to ED for patients who underwent pancreas transplantation originally with bladder diversion. Among 114 pancreas transplantation performed with BD, from January 1996 to April 2003, 60 were simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT), 35 were pancreas transplantation alone (PA), and 19 were pancreas after kidney transplantations (PAK). Twenty-three (20.2%) cases were excluded due to early death of the patient or the graft, yielding an analyses of 91 patients. Enteric conversion (EC) was performed in 14 (15.4%) patients with a mean follow-up of 15.7 months (range, 3-51 months) after transplantation including 8 (8.8%) SPKT, 4 (4.4%) PAK, and 2 (2.2%) PA. No surgical morbidity or mortality was observed related to EC. All patients had complete resolution of the initial problem with preservation of pancreatic function. EC represents an easy, safe procedure with low morbidity and mortality rates, representing the option of choice for patients with persistent urological or metabolic disturbances.
Perosa
M
M
HEPATO = Portuguese Welfare Hospital and Albert Einsten Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Genzini
T
T
Caravatto
P P P
PP
Marchini
G S
GS
Gil
A O
AO
Campagnari
J C
JC
Menegazzo
L A
LA
Abensur
H
H
Noronha
I L
IL
D006801:Humans; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000379:methods; D016035:Pancreas Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014547:Urinary Diversion / Q000379:methods*