Functional behaviour of bone around dental implants.
Achieving a long-term stable implant interface is a significant clinical issue when there is insufficient cortical bone stabilisation at implant placement. Clinical outcomes studies suggest that the higher risk implants are those placed in compromised cortical bone (thin, porous, etc.) in anatomical sites with minimal existing trabecular bone (characterised as type IV bone). In establishing and maintaining an implant interface in such an environment, one needs to consider the impact of masticatory forces, the response of bone to these forces and the impact of age on the adaptive capacity of bone. These forces, in turn, have the potential to create localised changes in interfacial stiffness through viscoelastic changes at the interface. Changes in bone as a function of age (e.g. localised hypermineralised osteopetrosis and localised areas of osteopenia) will alter the communication between osteocytes and osteoblasts creating the potential for differences in response of osteoblastic cells in the older population. A key to understanding the biomechanical and functional behaviour of implants in the older population is to control the anticipated modelling and remodelling behaviour through implant design that takes into account how tissues respond to the mechanically active environment.
Stanford
Clark M
CM
Dows Institute for Dental Research, College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA. clark-stanford@uiowa.edu
Schneider
Galen B
GB
D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D000539:Alveolar Process / Q000502:physiology*; D015921:Dental Implants; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D006801:Humans; D016348:Osseointegration / Q000502:physiology*; D010006:Osteoblasts / Q000502:physiology; D013499:Surface Properties
D015921:Dental Implants