title: Radiotherapy for glioma during pregnancy: fetal dose estimates, risk assessment and clinical management.
abstract: Cancer in pregnancy is relatively uncommon, but constitutes a major problem. We report the measurement of scatter dose to the fetus and the estimated fetal risk from that exposure in an illustrative case of a patient, 20 weeks pregnant, with a grade 3 anaplastic astrocytoma. A clinical decision was made to withhold radiotherapy, if possible, until after delivery. Sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed no progression during the pregnancy. In the event, she was managed conservatively until the successful completion of her pregnancy. In case radiotherapy was required, an estimation of the fetal risk was made. Phantom measurements were undertaken to assess the likely fetal dose. Film badges were used to estimate the scattered radiation energy. Measurements were made on a Varian 600C at 6 MV and Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) accelerator at 8 and 16 MV. Doses were measured at 30, 45 and 60 cm from the isocentre; the fetus was assumed to lie at about 60 cm and not closer than 45 cm from the isocentre. Estimated doses to the position of the fetus were lowest with the 6 MV Varian accelerator. Using this machine without additional abdominal shielding, the estimated dose on the surface at 45 cm from the tumour volume was 2.2 cGy for a tumour dose of 54 Gy; using the ABB accelerator, the dose varied between 49-59 cGy. The energy of scattered radiation was in the range 208-688 keV, so that additional shielding would be practical to further reduce the fetal dose. The risk of cancer up to the age of 15 years attributable to radiation is 1 in 1700 per cGy, of which half will be fatal (i.e. 1 in 3300 per cGy). A dose of 2.2 cGy adds a risk of fatal cancer by the age 15 years of only 1 in 1500. Because the addition of shielding might halve the fetal dose, this risk should be reduced to 1 in 3000. For comparison, the overall UK risk of cancer up to the age 15 years is 1 in 650. In conclusion, careful choice of linear accelerator for the treatment of a pregnant woman and the use of additional shielding is valuable, as this can dramatically affect fetal dose.
authors.affiliation: Oncology Centre, The Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. yasserhaba@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Haba
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Twyman
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Overton
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dendy
authors.forename: N G
authors.initials: NG
authors.lastname: Burnet
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D019583:Dose Fractionation, Radiation; D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus; D005910:Glioma / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D009381:Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced; D011247:Pregnancy; D011252:Pregnancy Complications, Neoplastic / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D011297:Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; D018570:Risk Assessment