title: Imagining how you'd feel: the role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit.
abstract: The authors propose that how people imagine they would feel about making a choice is affected not only by the outcome's anticipated pleasure or pain but also by regulatory fit. Regulatory fit occurs when people pursue a goal in a manner that sustains their regulatory state and it intensifies the motivation to pursue that goal. Considering positive outcomes fits a promotion focus more than a prevention focus, whereas the reverse is true for negative outcomes. Thus, it is proposed that anticipating a desirable choice is more intensely positive for promotion than prevention, and anticipating an undesirable choice is more intensely negative for prevention than promotion. The results of three studies support these predictions. Studies 2 and 3 also demonstrate that motivational intensity underlies the stronger responses. Thus, to understand fully what it means to feel good or bad about a prospective choice, motivational experiences from regulatory fit must be considered.
authors.affiliation: Harvard University, Boston, MA 02163, USA. lidson@hbs.edu
authors.forename: Lorraine Chen
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Idson
authors.forename: Nira
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Liberman
authors.forename: E Tory
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Higgins
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010990:Pleasure-Pain Principle