Veterinary school admission interviews, part 3: strategies for increasing interview validity.
The veterinary school admission interview is a widely used selection tool, yet concerns persist about its reliability, validity, and cost. Relative to medicine, optometry, and dentistry schools, veterinary schools have been more likely to conduct panel interviews and to fix the interview's weight in selection decisions, strategies that increase interview validity. This article provides strategies for further increasing the veterinary school interview's validity. Interview reliability and validity studies point to key strategies the veterinary school admissions committee can implement before the interview: (1) establishing the interview's purpose(s); (2) conducting a "job" analysis to identify desirable candidate skills, knowledge, and attributes; (3) developing a structured and panel interview where interviewers, if possible, are blind to other admission data; (4) training interviewers; (5) setting a reasonable interview schedule; and (6) determining methods for analyzing applicant data. During the interview, interviewers should proceed through a structured series of steps: (1) open the interview with a specified agenda; (2) probe for information using structured questions and anchored rating scales; (3) close the interview to allow for candidate questions; and (4) evaluate the interview data. After the interview, the admissions committee should (1) analyze the interview data within and across interviewers and (2) analyze the data across all selection tools in order to assign relative weights to the selection tools.
Lewis
Robert E
RE
Personnel Decisions International, 45 South Seventh St., Minneapolis, MN 55402 USA. bob.lewis@personneldecisions.com
van Walsum
Kimberly L
KL
Spafford
Marlee M
MM
Edwards
Janine C
JC
Turnwald
Grant H
GH
D004520:Education, Veterinary / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012570:School Admission Criteria; D014481:United States