Pityriasis rosea--evidence for and against an infectious aetiology.
Pityriasis rosea, first named as such in 1860, probably holds the longest record for an exanthem suspected to be associated with an infection but for which an exact cause has not been found. The distinctly programmed clinical course, the lack of recurrence for most patients, and the presence of temporal case clustering provide the strongest evidence to support an infectious aetiology. Further support comes from seasonal variation and the association with respiratory tract infections, the unfavourable social and economic background of cases, and a history in some cases of contact with patients with pityriasis rosea. The apparent therapeutic efficacy of several treatment modalities does not provide strong evidence for or against an infectious aetiology. The roles of human herpesvirus 7 and to a lesser extent human herpesvirus 6 remain controversial. There exists reasonable evidence that pityriasis rosea is not associated with cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, parvovirus B19, picornavirus, influenza and parainfluenza viruses, Legionella spp., Mycoplasma spp. and Chlamydia spp. infections. Evidence is also unsubstantiated as yet for alternative aetiological hypotheses such as autoimmunity, atopy, and genetic predisposition.
Chuh
A
A
Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Chan
H
H
Zawar
V
V
D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000150:complications*; D018450:Disease Progression; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D006801:Humans; D017515:Pityriasis Rosea / Q000382:microbiology* / Q000473:pathology / Q000821:virology*; D011379:Prognosis; D012307:Risk Factors; D012621:Seasons; D014777:Virus Diseases / Q000150:complications*