title: A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a "fair" process.
abstract: Two studies test the prediction of the four-component model of procedural justice that people evaluate the fairness of group procedures using four distinct types of judgment. The model hypothesizes that people are influenced by two aspects of the formal procedures of the group: those aspects that relate to decision making and those that relate to the quality of treatment that group members are entitled to receive under the rules. In addition, people are hypothesized to be separately influenced by two aspects of the authorities with whom they personally deal: the quality of decision making by those authorities and the quality of the treatment that they receive from them. The results of two studies support the hypothesis of the four-component model by finding that all four of the procedural judgments identified by the model contribute to overall evaluations of the fairness of group procedures.
authors.affiliation: Stern School of Business, Management Department, New York University, NY 10012, USA. sblader@stern.nyu.edu
authors.forename: Steven L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Blader
authors.forename: Tom R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Tyler
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004493:Education; D004651:Employment; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012935:Social Justice; D014481:United States