title: Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Clinical assessment of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter assumes clinical equivalency between ultrasound (US) and axial computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstruction allows for the assessment of AAA in the orthogonal plane and avoids oblique cuts due to AAA angulation. This study was undertaken to compare maximal AAA diameter by US, axial CT, and orthogonal CT, and to assess the effect that AAA angulation has on each measurement.
  
  
  METHODS
  Maximal AAA diameter by US (US(max)), axial CT (axial(max)), and orthogonal CT (orthogonal(max)) along with aortic angulation and minor axis diameters were measured prospectively. Spiral CT data was processed by Medical Media Systems (West Lebanon, NH) to produce computerized axial CT and reformatted orthogonal CT images. The US technologists were blinded to all CT results and vice versa.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirty-eight patients were analyzed. Mean axial(max) (58.0 mm) was significantly larger (P<0.05) than US(max) (53.9 mm) or orthogonal(max) (54.7 mm). The difference between US(max) and orthogonal(max) (0.8 mm) was insignificant (P>0.05). When aortic angulation was <==25 degrees, axial(max) (55.3 mm), US(max) (54.3 mm), and orthogonal(max) (54.1 mm) were similar (P>0.05); however, when aortic angulation was >25 degrees, axial(max) (60.1 mm) was significantly larger (P<0.001) than US(max) (53.8 mm) and orthogonal(max) (55.0 mm). The limits of agreement (LOA) between axial(max) and both US(max) and orthogonal(max) was poor and exceeded clinical acceptability (+/-5 mm). The variation between US(max) and orthogonal(max) was minimal with an acceptable LOA of -2.7 to 4.5 mm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared to axial CT, US is a better approximation of true perpendicular AAA diameter as determined by orthogonal CT. When aortic angulation is greater than 25 degrees axial CT becomes unreliable. However, US measurements are not affected by angulation and agree strongly with orthogonal CT measurements.
authors.affiliation: Eastern Virginia Medical School, 250 West Brambleton Avenue, Suite 101, Norfolk, VA 23510, USA.
authors.forename: L R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Sprouse
authors.forename: G H
authors.initials: GH
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: F N
authors.initials: FN
authors.lastname: Parent
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: DeMasi
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Glickman
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Barber
mesh_terms: D001012:Aorta, Abdominal / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D018616:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex