title: The stipulations of one institutional review board: a five year review.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study was designed to explore the prevalence and types of stipulations (such as clarifications or changes) required of investigators by the institutional review board (IRB) of one institution over a five year period.
  
  
  METHODS
  Stipulations to research proposals (n = 124) were documented from the minutes of the IRB meetings.
  
  
  METHODS
  Community hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  IRB submissions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Number and type of IRB stipulations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nineteen research submissions (15.3%) were approved without any stipulations. For the remainder, the majority of stipulations related to consent forms (74.2%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Consent forms appear to be at highest risk for IRB stipulations. Being aware of high risk areas before submission of research proposals may reduce the frequency of stipulations required of investigators.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Psychiatry and Internal Medicine, Wright State University School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio, USA. randy.sansone@kmcnetwork.org
authors.forename: R A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Sansone
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McDonald
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hanley
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sellbom
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Gaither
mesh_terms: D032962:Consent Forms / Q000941:ethics; D028741:Ethics Committees, Clinical; D004991:Ethics, Institutional; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006767:Hospitals, District; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics