title: Comparison of anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The anterior-posterior-glide Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing knee prosthesis was developed to approximate the natural kinematics of the knee more closely than the rotating-platform Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing knee prosthesis does. The purpose of the present study was to compare the results associated with these two prostheses in patients managed with simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred and ninety patients received an anterior-posterior-glide Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing prosthesis in one knee and a rotating-platform Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing prosthesis in the contralateral knee. The mean age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was sixty-four years. Eleven patients were men, and 179 patients were women. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 years (range, five to seven years). The patients were followed clinically and radiographically with use of the knee-rating systems of the Knee Society and the Hospital for Special Surgery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score was 89.4 points for the knees treated with the anterior-posterior-glide mobile-bearing prosthesis and 88.6 points for those treated with the rotating-platform mobile-bearing prosthesis. Three knees in each group had a poor result. Two knees in each group had persistent moderate pain. One knee with an anterior-posterior-glide prosthesis had permanent tibial and deep peroneal nerve palsies, and one knee with a rotating-platform prosthesis had a permanent deep peroneal nerve palsy. No knee had aseptic loosening, revision, measurable wear of the tibial or patellar polyethylene bearing, or osteolysis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  After a minimum duration of follow-up of five years, the results associated with the anterior-posterior-glide and rotating-platform Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements were favorable and comparable.
authors.affiliation: The Joint Replacement Center of Korea at Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, DongDaeMun Hospital, Seoul, Korea. younghookim@netsgo.com
authors.forename: Young-Hoo
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Jun-Shik
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015915:Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000453:epidemiology; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D013165:Splints; D013997:Time Factors; D016138:Walking