Relationship of body surface area with bone density and its risk of osteoporosis at various skeletal regions in women of mainland China.
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between body surface area (BS) and bone mineral density (BMD) and the associated osteoporosis risk at various skeletal regions in women from mainland China. BMD was measured at the posteroanterior (PA) spine (L1-L4), supine lateral spine (L2-L4) including volumetric BMD (vBMD), hip including femoral neck, trochanter and total hip, and forearm, including radius + ulna ultradistal (R + UUD), 1/3 site (R + U1/3) and total region (R + UT) using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) fan-beam bone densitometer (Hologic QDR 4500A) in 3418 females aged from 18 to 75 years. Data analysis revealed a positive correlation between BS and BMD at the various skeletal regions (r = 0.114-0.373, all P = 0.000), but no correlation with vBMD (r = 0.000, P = 0.934). Using the stepwise regression model, BMDs at various skeletal regions were dependent variables while height, weight, body mass index (BMI), BS and projective bone area (BA) were independent variables; BS was determined to be the most important variable that affected the PA spine, hip and forearm BMDs. Subjects were divided into three groups according to size: large BS group (LBSG), intermediate BS group (IBSG) and small BS group (SBSG). The BMD at different skeletal regions of subjects between groups exhibited a significant gradient difference, with LBSG > IBSG > SBSG, but this was not seen for vBMD. On the fitting curves where BMD varied with age at the PA spine, femoral neck, total hip and R + UUD, BMDs of LBSG were 6.93-9.29% higher than those of IBSG and 12.1-16.9 % higher than those of SBSG, whereas those of SBSG were 6.12-9.59% lower than those of IBSG at various skeletal regions, respectively. The prevalence rates and risks of osteoporosis of LBSG were significantly lower than those of SBSG and IBSG, whereas those of IBSG were obviously lower than those of SBSG at various skeletal regions, respectively, presenting a gradient difference among the three study groups, LBSG < IBSG < SBSG. Our study shows that the relationship between BS and BMD exceeds that between BMD and height or weight in women in mainland China. When areal BMD is employed, those with a larger BS have higher areal BMD and lower risks of osteoporosis while, conversely, those with a smaller BS have lower areal BMD, and therefore higher risk for osteoporosis. However, when vBMD is used, these differences diminish or even disappear.
Wu
Xian-Ping
XP
Institute of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiang-Ya Hospital, Central South University, 86 Renmin-Zhong Road, 410011, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China. wuxp39@sohu.com
Liao
Er-Yuan
EY
Liu
Shi-Ping
SP
Zhang
Hong
H
Shan
Peng-Fei
PF
Cao
Xing-Zhi
XZ
Jiang
Yebin
Y
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001830:Body Surface Area; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology*; D002681:China / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000503:physiopathology; D005272:Femur Neck / Q000503:physiopathology; D005542:Forearm; D006615:Hip; D006801:Humans; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000503:physiopathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D015995:Prevalence; D011884:Radius / Q000503:physiopathology; D012307:Risk Factors; D014457:Ulna / Q000503:physiopathology