Auditing concept categorizations in the UMLS.
The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) integrates about 880,000 concepts from 100 biomedical terminologies. Each concept is categorized to at least one semantic type of the Semantic Network. During the integration, it is unavoidable that some categorization errors and inconsistencies will be introduced. In this paper, we present an auditing technique to find such errors and inconsistencies. Our technique is based on an expert reviewing the pure intersections of meta-semantic types of a metaschema, a compact abstract view of the UMLS Semantic Network. We use a divide and conquer approach, handling differently small pure intersections and medium to large pure intersections. By using this approach, we limit the number of concepts reviewed, for which we expect a high percentage of errors. We reviewed all concepts in 657 pure intersections containing one to 10 concepts. Various kinds of errors are identified and the analysis of the results are presented in the paper. Also, we checked the pure intersections containing more than 10 concepts for their semantic soundness, where the semantically suspicious pure intersections are presented in the paper and their concepts are reviewed.
Gu
Huanying
H
Department of Health Informatics, University of Medicine and Dentistry of NJ, Newark, NJ 07107, USA. guhy@umdnj.edu
Perl
Yehoshua
Y
Elhanan
Gai
G
Min
Hua
H
Zhang
Li
L
Peng
Yi
Y
D000043:Abstracting and Indexing / Q000379:methods*; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000379:methods; D009317:National Library of Medicine (U.S.); D012660:Semantics; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D017432:Unified Medical Language System; D014481:United States