title: Using nuclear morphometry to discriminate the tumorigenic potential of cells: a comparison of statistical methods.
abstract: Despite interest in the use of nuclear morphometry for cancer diagnosis and prognosis as well as to monitor changes in cancer risk, no generally accepted statistical method has emerged for the analysis of these data. To evaluate different statistical approaches, Feulgen-stained nuclei from a human lung epithelial cell line, BEAS-2B, and a human lung adenocarcinoma (non-small cell) cancer cell line, NCI-H522, were subjected to morphometric analysis using a CAS-200 imaging system. The morphometric characteristics of these two cell lines differed significantly. Therefore, we proceeded to address the question of which statistical approach was most effective in classifying individual cells into the cell lines from which they were derived. The statistical techniques evaluated ranged from simple, traditional, parametric approaches to newer machine learning techniques. The multivariate techniques were compared based on a systematic cross-validation approach using 10 fixed partitions of the data to compute the misclassification rate for each method. For comparisons across cell lines at the level of each morphometric feature, we found little to distinguish nonparametric from parametric approaches. Among the linear models applied, logistic regression had the highest percentage of correct classifications; among the nonlinear and nonparametric methods applied, the Classification and Regression Trees model provided the highest percentage of correct classifications. Classification and Regression Trees has appealing characteristics: there are no assumptions about the distribution of the variables to be used, there is no need to specify which interactions to test, and there is no difficulty in handling complex, high-dimensional data sets containing mixed data types.
authors.affiliation: Cancer Prevention Laboratory, Colorado State University, 111 Shepardson Building, 1173 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA. wolfep@earthlink.net
authors.forename: Pamela
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wolfe
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: McGinley
authors.forename: Zongjian
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zhu
authors.forename: Weiqin
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.forename: E Brigitte
authors.initials: EB
authors.lastname: Gottschall
authors.forename: Henry J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Thompson
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000145:classification / Q000473:pathology*; D001980:Bronchi / Q000473:pathology; D002289:Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Q000145:classification / Q000473:pathology*; D018929:Cell Culture Techniques; D002467:Cell Nucleus / Q000473:pathology; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004847:Epithelial Cells / Q000145:classification / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000145:classification / Q000473:pathology*; D015233:Models, Statistical; D016571:Neural Networks, Computer; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D014407:Tumor Cells, Cultured