Sleepwalking violence: a sleep disorder, a legal dilemma, and a psychological challenge.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this article is to further an understanding of the psychological state when aggression follows an episode of partial arousal from early non-REM sleep during which some areas of the brain appear to be functioning as in waking while others appear to remain in a state of sleep. To illustrate this, the author examines a case of homicide for which the defense argued lack of responsibility due to sleepwalking.


METHODS
A review of the forensic literature on sleepwalking aggression and sleep studies suggests that these fall into one or both of two DSM-IV-TR diagnoses: sleepwalking disorder and sleep terror disorder. The new case, which would meet criteria for an overlap disorder in which sleepwalking is followed by sleep terror, is compared to one previously published.


RESULTS
These findings support sleepwalking violence as a distinct overlap disorder with common disturbed psychological functioning during and for a period up to 1 hour following an aggressive episode.


CONCLUSIONS
Research clarifies the pathology of this disorder and highlights the need to both refine the differential diagnosis and test the efficacy of treatment protocols.
Cartwright
Rosalind
R
Department of Psychology, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. rcartwri@rush.edu
D000328:Adult; D001332:Automatism / Q000523:psychology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry; D006708:Homicide / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D020184:Night Terrors / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D010375:Pedigree; D020923:REM Sleep Parasomnias / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D013009:Somnambulism / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000235:genetics / Q000523:psychology*; D014754:Violence / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology*