International content of high-ranking nursing journals in the year 2000.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the extent of an international perspective in publication in nursing journals.


METHODS
Characteristics of 2,581 articles, authors of articles, and journals (editorial purpose and editorial team) of 42 high-ranking nursing journals for the year 2000 were analyzed.


METHODS
The characteristics were assessed using seven operational definitions of "international."


RESULTS
Major findings were: (a) 747 (28.9%) articles were identified as international, of which (b) 705 (94.3%) were placed in the scholarly or empirical categories; (c) more articles were categorized as empirical in the international articles; more articles were categorized as scholarly among the noninternational articles; (d) 763 (79.3%) articles met an international definition based on author characteristics; and (e) 20 (47.6%) journals had international editorial teams.


CONCLUSIONS
Nearly 30% of articles had international content. Articles with international content were more frequently databased than were noninternational articles. The study provides a baseline indication of the extent of international perspectives in published articles in nursing journals. The extent to which these international articles make substantial contributions to knowledge has yet to be discovered.
Dougherty
Molly C
MC
School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7460 Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7460, USA. mdougher@email.unc.edu
Lin
Shu-Yuan
SY
McKenna
Hugh P
HP
Seers
Kate
K
D001319:Authorship; D015706:Bibliometrics; D035081:Editorial Policies; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011643:Publishing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012107:Research Design