title: Comparison of CT and MRI for the diagnosis recurrent esophageal carcinoma after operation.
abstract: Despite an increase in radical surgery for esophageal carcinoma, many patients continue to develop recurrent disease. Some reports have suggested that recurrent tumors should be treated aggressively with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the comparative utility of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the evaluation of recurrence after curative resection of cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. To maximize survival benefit, detection of tumor recurrence as early and accurately as possible is important. Twenty-three patients who developed recurrent tumors after curative transthoracic esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma were analyzed retrospectively. The CT and MRI findings were correlated with pathology or with endoscopic and clinical follow-up. Primary tumor recurrence was detected at the anastomosis side in 19 patients (intraluminal mass in 13 and as diffuse or focal wall thickening in six). Distant recurrence was seen in the liver (n = 5), lung (n = 4), bone (n = 3), abdominal lymph node (n = 4), pleural effusion (n = 2) and pericardial effusion (n = 1). CT and MRI were found equal in showing the intraluminal mass, liver metastasis, pleural and pericardial effusion. Thickening of esophageal wall was demonstrated in nine patients using CT, but only seven of these tumor recurrences were confirmed by MRI, the remaining two were related to secondary fibrosis. Both CT and MRI showed diffuse gastric wall thickening determined as false tumor recurrence due to severe gastritis in one case. There were two (50%) false negatives for lung metastasis in MRI and one bone metastasis (33%) false negative in CT. CT was found superior in the demonstration of lung metastasis and MRI was superior in the evaluation of wall thickening and bone metastasis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey. akkanrad@hotmail.com
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kantarci
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Polat
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Alper
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Eroglu
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Eren
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Okur
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Onbaş
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D016629:Esophagectomy / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011336:Probability; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D016019:Survival Analysis; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed