title: Incidents/accidents classification and reporting in Statoil.
abstract: Based on requirements in the new petroleum regulations from Norwegian Petroleum Directorate (NPD) and the realisation of a need to improve and rationalise the routines for reporting and follow up of incidents, Statoil Exploration & Production Norway (Statoil E&P Norway) has formulated a new strategy and process for handling of incidents/accidents. The following past experiences serve as basis for the changes made to incident reporting in Statoil E&P Norway; too much resources were spent on a comprehensive handling and analysis of a vast amount of incidents with less importance for the safety level, taking the focus away from the more severe and important issues at hand, the assessment of "Risk Factor", i.e. the combination of recurrence frequency and consequence, was difficult to use. The high degree of subjectivity involved in the determination of the "Risk Factor" (in particular the estimation of the recurrence frequency) resulted in poor data quality and lack of consistency in the data material. The new system for categorisation and handling of undesirable incidents was established in January 2002. The intention was to get a higher degree of focus on serious incidents (injuries, damages, loss and near misses), with a thorough handling and follow-up. This is reflected throughout the handling of the serious incidents, all the way from immediate notification of the incident, through investigation and follow-up of corrective and preventive actions. Simultaneously, it was also an objective to rationalise/simplify the handling of less serious incidents. These incidents are, however, subjected to analyses twice a year in order to utilize the learning opportunity that they also provide. A year after the introduction of this new system for categorisation and follow-up of undesirable incidents, Statoil's experiences are predominantly good; the intention to get a higher degree of focus on serious incidents (injuries, damages, loss and near misses), has been met, the data quality for the more serious incidents (5% of the total number of incidents registered) has improved, the improved handling of incidents has contributed to more reliable and accurate HSE indicators at a corporate level, more user friendly codes in place for incident registration (based on MTO methodology), the revised matrix gives distinct criteria with respect to which investigation level to be initiated for a specific incident. All activities related to handling of undesirable incidents have been summarised and illustrated on a two-sided plastic form, incorporating both the categorisation matrix and the activity flowchart (see Figs. 1 and 4).
authors.affiliation: Env. and Safety Technology, Statoil TEK F&T MST, R-2015, Statoil ASA, Stavanger N-4035, Norway. rber@statoil.com
authors.forename: Rune
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Berentsen
authors.forename: Rolf H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Holmboe
mesh_terms: D000062:Accidents, Occupational / Q000145:classification* / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002617:Chemical Industry / Q000458:organization & administration; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D009664:Norway; D010578:Petroleum; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D010578:Petroleum