title: Displaced type II extension supracondylar humerus fractures: do they all need pinning?
abstract: The treatment of a displaced type II extension supracondylar humerus fracture is controversial. Many authors recommend that all displaced type II fractures be surgically pinned. The purpose of this study was to determine the success of reduction and casting (without pinning) in maintaining the alignment of type II fractures. Of the 25 elbows that underwent an initial reduction in the emergency room, 18 (72%) maintained alignment. Seven fractures lost position, and five of the seven patients underwent secondary reduction and pinning. Twenty-three of the 25 (92%) elbows had a satisfactory outcome and 2 of the 25 (8%) had an unsatisfactory outcome according to the Flynn criteria. All 24 patients were satisfied with the treatment on a satisfaction survey. An attempt at closed reduction and casting, with selective pinning of the fractures that lose position, appears justified if close follow-up can be maintained.
authors.affiliation: Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA.
authors.forename: Shital N
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Parikh
authors.forename: Eric J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Wall
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Foad
authors.forename: Brent
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wiersema
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Nolte
mesh_terms: D001858:Bone Nails; D002370:Casts, Surgical; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004551:Elbow Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006810:Humeral Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000628:therapy*; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012189:Retrospective Studies