Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of four packable composite resins, SureFil (Dentsply, Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), Prodigy Condensable (Kerr Co., Orange, CA, USA), Filtek P60 (3M do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil), and ALERT (Jeneric/Pentron, Inc., Wallingford, CT, USA) and one microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z250, 3M do Brasil) after polishing with four finishing systems.


METHODS
Twenty specimens were made of each material (5 mm in diameter and 4 mm high) and were analyzed with a profilometer (Perthometer S8P, Perthen, Mahr, Germany) to measure the mean surface roughness (Ra). The specimens were then divided into four groups according to the polishing system: group 1--Sof-Lex (3M do Brasil), group 2--Enhance (Dentsply), group 3--Composite Finishing Kit (KG Sorensen, Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil), and group 4--Jiffy Polisher Cups (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, UT, USA). The specimens were polished and then evaluated for Ra, and the data were subjected to analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and Tukey's test (p = .05).


RESULTS
The mean Ra of SureFil polished with Sof-Lex was significantly lower than that of KG points. Prodigy Condensable polished with Enhance showed a significantly less rough surface than when polished with Sof-Lex. Filtek P60 did not exhibit a significant difference with the various polishing systems. For ALERT the lowest mean Ra was obtained with Sof-Lex and the highest mean Ra with KG points. Regarding Filtek Z250, polishing with KG and Jiffy points resulted in a significantly lower mean Ra than when polished with Enhance.


CONCLUSIONS
Packable composite resins display variable roughness depending on the polishing system used; the Sof-Lex disks and Jiffy points resulted in the best Ra values for the majority of the materials tested.


CONCLUSIONS
The Sof-Lex disks and the Jiffy points produced the smoothest surfaces for the tested resin composites. As a result, they should be considered for clinical use as preferred polishing systems for these resin composites.
Borges
Alessandra Bühler
AB
Restorative Dentistry, UNESP School of Dentistry, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil. alebuhler@iconet.com.br
Marsilio
Ana Lucia
AL
Pagani
Clóvis
C
Rodrigues
José Roberto
JR
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry*; D003775:Dental Polishing / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008422:Materials Testing; D013499:Surface Properties
D003188:Composite Resins; C403464:SureFil packable composite