title: Malaria Panel Assay versus PCR: detection of naturally infected Anopheles melas in a coastal village of Equatorial Guinea.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A study was carried out in a village of the mainland region of Equatorial Guinea in order to ascertain a) which members of Anopheles gambiae complex could be involved in malaria transmission and b) the rate of infectivity for Anopheles melas comparing two different methods, a PCR able to detect sporozoite-DNA and an immunochromatographic assay MPR (Malaria Rapid Dipstick Panel Assay).
  
  
  METHODS
  Mosquitoes were sampled at night by indoor captures in two houses of a coastal village in Equatorial Guinea (Ayantang). Collected mosquitoes were identified as An. gambiae s.l. These were individually dried into silica-gel. The head-thorax of the An. gambiae s.l. mosquitoes were analysed by PCR to verify that the species was of the gambiae complex. Individual head-thorax and pools (5 pools) of homogenized mosquitoes employed in Malaria Rapid Panel assay (MRP assay) were lysed and DNA was extracted. PCR was designed from the 753 base pair insert of pBRKl-14 and DNA was amplified. The relationship between dipstick and PCR to detect Plasmodium falciparum sporozoites was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity and test association (Cohen's kappa value).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two hundred and sixty-four An. gambiae s.l. females were studied (214 individually and five pools with 10 mosquitoes in each). PCR analysis showed that 207 mosquitoes were An. melas, 3 An. gambiae s.s. and 4 could not be identified. By using PCR as the gold standard method when dipstick assay was compared, matching results were obtained for 6 mosquitoes and, in one case MRP was positive while PCR was not reactive. MRP assay showed a low sensitivity (3.3%) when compared with falciparum-DNA detection (17,7% and 14,3%, series A and B respectively). Agreement between the two test formats was low (kappa = 0,224).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It was determined that An. melas is the main anopheline vector involved in malaria transmission in Ayantang, a coastal village in mainland Equatorial Guinea. A comparison of PCR and Vec-Test Assay, concluded that the PCR method proved to be a more sensitive and useful tool than the dipstick assay to determine the malarial infection rate in mosquitoes in an area of stable and high malaria transmission like Equatorial Guinea.
authors.affiliation: Laboratorio de Malaria. Servicio de Parasitología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. martamor@isciii.es
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moreno
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Cano
authors.forename: Sisinio
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nzambo
authors.forename: Leonardo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bobuakasi
authors.forename: Jesús N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Buatiche
authors.forename: Melchor
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ondo
authors.forename: Francisco
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Micha
authors.forename: Agustín
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Benito
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000145:classification / Q000469:parasitology*; D016054:DNA, Protozoan / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Q000379:methods; D016703:Equatorial Guinea; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007303:Insect Vectors / Q000145:classification / Q000469:parasitology*; D016778:Malaria, Falciparum / Q000635:transmission*; D010963:Plasmodium falciparum / Q000235:genetics / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D016054:DNA, Protozoan