Using grounded theory to examine people's attitudes toward how animals are used.
This study uses qualitative methodology to examine why people have different attitudes toward different types of nonhuman animal use. Seventeen participants took part in a semi-structured interview. The study used Grounded Theory to analyze the interviews and developed a model that consists of 4 major themes: (a) "attitudes toward animals," (b) "knowledge of animal use procedures," (c) "perceptions of choice," and (d) "cost-benefit analysis." The findings illustrate that cognitive processing, characteristics of the species of animal being used, and the type of animal use can all influence attitudes toward animal use. Because previous research has focused on participant variables such as age and gender to explain variance in attitudes toward animal use (Furnham & Pinder, 1990; Kellert & Berry, 1981) and measured attitudes toward animal use in general (rather than distinguishing between different types of use) (Armstrong & Hutchins, 1996), these findings can add to knowledge of people's views on animal use. This paper discusses how such views may be justified and maintained.
Knight
Sarah
S
University of Portsmouth, Department of Psychology, King Henry Building, King Henry Stree, Portsmouth, UK PO1 2DY. sarah.knight@port.ac.uk
Nunkoosing
Karl
K
Vrij
Aldert
A
Cherryman
Julie
J
D000328:Adult; D032761:Animal Experimentation; D023401:Animal Use Alternatives; D000827:Animal Welfare; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic; D000830:Animals, Laboratory; D000835:Animals, Wild; D001290:Attitude; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008460:Meat; D036301:Qualitative Research