title: Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: the role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length.
abstract: In most jurisdictions, the law does not recognize the distinction between stranger and acquaintance rape. However, these two types of rape seem to elicit different responses from both lay observers and legal practitioners. Two studies investigating the role of benevolent sexism (BS) in accounting for participants' responses to acquaintance vs. stranger rape perpetrators are reported. Participants were presented with vignettes describing either an acquaintance rape or a stranger rape. As predicted, relative to low-BS individuals, participants who scored high in BS attributed less blame (Study 1) and recommended shorter sentences (Study 2) for the acquaintance rape perpetrator. Benevolent sexism was unrelated to reactions to the perpetrator in the stranger rape condition.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom. g.t.viki@kent.ac.uk
authors.forename: G Tendayi
authors.initials: GT
authors.lastname: Viki
authors.forename: Dominic
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Abrams
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Masser
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000145:classification*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D011902:Rape; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012938:Social Perception; D013240:Stereotyping; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires