title: Race and information processing in criminal trials: does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated?
abstract: Two studies examined whether a criminal defendant's race influences Whites' sensitivity to legally relevant information. In Study 1, prosecution case strength ratings and guilt likelihood ratings were more sensitive to the strength of the defendant's alibi when he was Black than when he was White, if the experimental task was designed to elicit low processing motivation. Under high motivation, participants were equally sensitive to alibi strength, regardless of defendant race. In Study 2, the alibi strength manipulation was replaced with a manipulation of the effectiveness of the district attorney's cross-examination. As predicted, defense case strength ratings were more sensitive to the strength of the prosecutor's cross-examination with a Black defendant than with a White defendant-under low motivation. Under high motivation, sensitivity did not depend on defendant race. These results suggest that a Black defendant can elicit greater sensitivity to legally relevant information than will a White defendant.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240, USA. msargent@bates.edu
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Sargent
authors.forename: Amy L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Bradfield
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American; D001290:Attitude; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes; D009042:Motivation; D012938:Social Perception; D044465:White People