title: [Low dose helical CT pelvimetry: evaluation of radiation dose and image processing].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  to estimate from phantom measurements the radiation dose and the accuracy of helical ct pelvimetry.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eight helical CT acquisitions using different tube current (100, 50, 25 or 10mAs) and pitch factor (1.125 or 1.375) settings but identical collimation (2mm) and kilovoltage (120 kVp) were evaluated using a four-channel MDCT scanner and compared with conventional CT pelvimetry including a single scout and two transverse images. A plexiglas phantom combined with an ionization chamber was used to calculate the CTDIw and DLP for each acquisition. Then, an ex vivo phantom of bony pelvis was used to evaluate the accuracy of helical acquisitions for the measurement of pelvic diameters (i.e. the antero-posterior inlet, the transverse inlet and the interspinous distance). Reconstructions of helical acquisitions were performed using 2D MPR, 3D MIP and 3D SSD algorithms.
  
  
  RESULTS
  CTDIw and DLP of conventional pelvimetry were 26 mGy and 42 mGy.cm respectively. The radiation dose of helical acquisitions decreased linearly with tube current (CTDIw: from 13 to 1.3 mGy, DLP: from 218.3 to 18.7 mGy.cm). Compared to conventional CT, the dose was nearly similar at 25 mAs and reduced at 10 mAs. Helical acquisitions provided accurate measurements of pelvic diameters with a pitch of 1.125 and a 2D MPR algorithm to evaluate the AP inlet and a 3D MIP algorithm to evaluate the transverse inlet and the interspinous distance. Variations of tube current did not influence the accuracy of pelvic diameter measurement.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results suggest that accurate low-dose helical CT pelvimetry using 10-25 mAs and a pitch factor of 1.125 combined with 2D MPR and 3D MIP reconstructions is possible.
authors.affiliation: Service de radiologie adultes, groupement d'imagerie, CHU Bretonneau, 2 boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours cedex 1.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Garnier
authors.forename: Ph
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bertrand
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Chapiron
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Asquier
authors.forename: Ph
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rouleau
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Brunereau
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000886:Anthropometry; D002985:Clinical Protocols / Q000592:standards; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D010384:Pelvic Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D010387:Pelvimetry / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011874:Radiometry; D036542:Tomography, Spiral Computed / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards