Energy budget versus temporal discounting as determinants of preference in risky choice.
Four pigeons and three ringneck doves responded on an operant simulation of natural foraging. After satisfying a schedule of reinforcement associated with search time, subjects could "accept" or "reject" another schedule of reinforcement associated with handling time. Two schedules of reinforcement were available, a variable interval, and a fixed interval with the same mean value. Food available in the session (a variable related to the energy budget) was manipulated in the different conditions either by increases of the value of the search state schedule of reinforcement, or by increases in the mean value of the handling state schedules. The results indicate that the amount of food available in the session did not affect the preference for variable schedules of reinforcement, as would be predicted by an influential theory of risk sensitive foraging. Instead, the preference for variability depended on the relationship between the time spent in the search and the handling states, as is predicted by a family of models of choice that are based on the temporal proximity to the reinforcer.
Orduña
Vladimir
V
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México D.F. 04510, Mexico. vladord@servidor.unam.mx
Bouzas
Arturo
A
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D012309:Risk-Taking