title: Exemplars, prototypes, and the flexibility of classification models.
abstract: J. P. Minda and J. D. Smith (2001) showed that a prototype model outperforms an exemplar model, especially in larger categories or categories that contained more complex stimuli. R. M. Nosofsky and S. R. Zaki (2002) showed that an exemplar model with a response-scaling mechanism outperforms a prototype model. The authors of the current study investigated whether excessive model flexibility could explain these results. Using cross-validation, the authors demonstrated that both the prototype model and the exemplar model with a response-scaling mechanism suffered from overfilling in the linearly separable category structure. The results illustrate the need to make sure that the best-fitting model is not chasing error variance instead of variance attributed to the cognitive process it is supposed to model.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Box 1225, SE-751, Uppsala, Sweden. henrik.olsson@psyk.uu.se
authors.forename: Henrik
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Olsson
authors.forename: Pia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wennerholm
authors.forename: Urban
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Lyxzèn
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological