title: On the role of recognition in decision making.
abstract: In 2 experiments, the authors sought to distinguish between the claim that recognition of an object is treated simply as a cue among others for the purposes of decision making in a cue-learning task from the claim that recognition is attributed a special status with fundamental, noncompensatory properties. Results of both experiments supported the former interpretation. When recognition had a high predictive validity, it was relied on (solely) by the majority of participants; however, when other cues in the environment had higher validity, recognition was ignored, and these other cues were used. The results provide insight into when, where, and why recognition is used in decision making and also question the elevated status assigned to recognition in some frameworks (e.g., D. G. Goldstein & G. Gigerenzer, 2002).
authors.affiliation: Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution.
authors.forename: Ben R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Newell
authors.affiliation: Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution.
authors.forename: David R
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-4600-6323
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Shanks
mesh_terms: D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D021641:Recognition, Psychology