Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal.
Many compendia at the species, genus and family levels document the fossil record, but these are not standardized, nor usually critical in content, and few are available on the World Wide Web. The sampling of the available record is good for organisms with fossilizable parts, but preservational constraints on the entire morphology, life history and geographical distribution lead to difficulties in recognizing and naming species. We recommend abandoning some of the palaeontological species concepts such as chronospecies and stratospecies, and we advocate species recognition based on unique combinations of characters. The compilation of species lists is extremely time consuming, and given the inherent problems we suggest that compilation of generic lists is a more achievable goal because genera are recognized by definitive morphological characters. In calculating taxon duration, care must be taken to distinguish between mono-, para- and polyphyletic groups, the first being the only reliable unit for use in calculating diversity curves. We support the inclusion of fossils into classifications based on Recent organisms, but we recognize some of the problems this may pose for standard Linnaean classifications. Web-based taxonomy is the way forward, having the advantages of speed and currency of information dissemination, universal access with links to primary literature and increasingly sophisticated imagery. These advantages over conventional outlets will only be realized with careful Web design and a commitment to maintenance.
Forey
Peter L
PL
Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. plf@nhm.ac.uk
Fortey
Richard A
RA
Kenrick
Paul
P
Smith
Andrew B
AB
D000717:Anatomy, Comparative; D044822:Biodiversity; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D005580:Fossils; D020407:Internet; D010802:Phylogeny; D013045:Species Specificity; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D013997:Time Factors