Loss aversion and inhibition in dynamical models of multialternative choice.
The roles of loss aversion and inhibition among alternatives are examined in models of the similarity, compromise, and attraction effects that arise in choices among 3 alternatives differing on 2 attributes. R. M. Roe, J. R. Busemeyer, and J. T. Townsend (2001) have proposed a linear model in which effects previously attributed to loss aversion (A. Tversky & D. Kahneman, 1991) arise from attention switching between attributes and similarity-dependent inhibitory interactions among alternatives. However, there are several reasons to maintain loss aversion in a theory of choice. In view of this, an alternative theory is proposed, integrating loss aversion and attention switching into a nonlinear model (M. Usher & J. L. McClelland, 2001) that relies on inhibition independent of similarity among alternatives. The model accounts for the 3 effects and makes testable predictions contrasting with those of the Roe et al. (2001) model.
Usher
Marius
M
Department of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, England. m.usher@bbk.ac.uk
McClelland
James L
JL
D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009042:Motivation; D017711:Nonlinear Dynamics