title: Contextual moderation of racial bias: the impact of social roles on controlled and automatically activated attitudes.
abstract: Three experiments tested the hypothesis that the social roles implied by specific contexts can attenuate or reverse the typical pattern of racial bias obtained on both controlled and automatic evaluation measures. Study 1 assessed evaluations of Black and Asian faces in contexts related to athlete or student roles. Study 2 compared evaluations of Black and White faces in 3 role-related contexts (prisoner, churchgoer, and factory worker). Study 3 manipulated role cues (lawyer or prisoner) within the same prison context. All 3 studies produced significant reversals of racial bias as a function of implied role on measures of both controlled and automatic evaluation. These results support the interpretation that differential evaluations based on Race x Role interactions provide one way that context can moderate both controlled and automatic racial bias.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1222, USA. barden.5@osu.edu
authors.forename: Jamie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Barden
authors.forename: William W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: Maddux
authors.forename: Richard E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Petty
authors.forename: Marilynn B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Brewer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D001332:Automatism; D005006:Ethnicity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D012919:Social Behavior; D013177:Sports