Reasoning, integration, inference alteration, and text comprehension.
This paper reports how the study of formal logical reasoning provides insight into more everyday types of reasoning, such as that involved in language comprehension. Both of these types of cognition are thought to involve the use of mental models, and so it is reasonable to think that the cognitive operations needed for formal logical reasoning would be involved in everyday reasoning as well. We focused on three aspects of formal reasoning: (a) the integration of information into a common mental model, (b) the drawing of inferences, and (c) the coordination of alternative possibilities. We were able to show that the integration and inference components were related to narrative comprehension processes, but the coordination of alternative models was not. Thus, there is evidence for some overlap in the mental processes used in formal and everyday reasoning. This further justifies the study of formal logical reasoning as a window into certain types of everyday reasoning.
Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. Gabriel.A.Radvansky.1@nd.edu
Gabriel A
GA
Radvansky
David E
DE
Copeland
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D032882:Comprehension; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008128:Logic; D008568:Memory; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013850:Thinking