Procedural justice and social regulation across group boundaries: does subgroup identity undermine relationship-based governance?
The relational model of authority suggests that people are inclined to accept the decisions of ethnic outgroup authorities when they identify with a superordinate category they share with the authority, and when the authority satisfies their relational justice concerns. Using responses from a random sample of African Americans, Latinos, and Whites about their cross-ethnic interactions with legal authorities, the findings indicated that those who are highly identified with the superordinate category of America indicate greater reliance on relational concerns and less on instrumental concerns when evaluating the authority's decision. In contrast, identification with one's ethnic subgroup did not moderate the linkage between relational concerns and acceptance. Across all ethnic groups, there were positive rather than negative correlations between measures of American and ethnic identity. Together, these findings indicate that subgroup identity does not undermine the relational basis of social regulation and that relationship-based governance is compatible with multiculturalism.
Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles, 4625 Franz Hall, Box 951563, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA. huo@psych.ucla.edu
Yuen J
YJ
Huo
D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American; D002140:California; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005006:Ethnicity / Q000523:psychology*; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006630:Hispanic or Latino; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D035846:Law Enforcement; D011822:Race Relations; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D012933:Social Identification; D044465:White People