Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model.
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair uses tacks to secure mesh. The mesh is designed to maximize tissue ingrowth while minimizing adhesions. We hypothesized: (1) a collagen-coated polyester mesh (PCO) will form fewer adhesions than an ePTFE-polypropylene composite (BC) and (2) absorbable tacks are equivalent to metal tacks.


METHODS
In a porcine model of adhesion formation, three pieces of 10x15-cm mesh were placed on the anterior abdominal wall. PCO was secured with absorbable (PLA) or metal tacks (PT), BC with PT. At 28 days, adhesion formation, abdominal-wall adherence, and tissue ingrowth were analyzed.


RESULTS
PCO induced fewer adhesions (14.5% vs 53.4%, P = 0.007). On an adhesion scale (0 5), BC scored 3.6 vs 1.75 for PCO (P < 0.03). There was no difference in adhesion strength, tack adhesions, or abdominal-wall peel force. Histology showed equal ingrowth.


CONCLUSIONS
PCO induces fewer adhesions than BC. There is no difference in the ingrowth of the two mesh types. The PLA achieves equivalent mesh incorporation to the PT.
Minimal Access Surgery Center Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
A J
AJ
Duffy
N J
NJ
Hogle
K M
KM
LaPerle
D L
DL
Fowler
D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D003094:Collagen / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005260:Female; D006555:Hernia, Ventral / Q000601:surgery*; D010535:Laparoscopy; D023421:Models, Animal; D011091:Polyesters / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011126:Polypropylenes / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D013536:Suture Techniques; D013537:Sutures; D013552:Swine; D000267:Tissue Adhesions / Q000209:etiology; D014945:Wound Healing
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D011091:Polyesters; D011126:Polypropylenes; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D003094:Collagen