Forensic psychiatry and political controversy.
This article gives a U.K.-based perspective on the involvement of forensic psychiatry organizations in questions of political controversy. Medical professional bodies are fundamentally concerned to uphold good standards of clinical practice and patient welfare, and to uphold professional medical ethics. In our specialty, when acting as individual expert witnesses, we seek to serve the courts with objectivity and respect for the law. However, as members of our professional bodies we have a legitimate medical concern about how the law affects the mentally disordered as a class. We should articulate a collective view about what treating the mentally disordered justly and appropriately in the legal system means and should challenge the law when it fails to achieve this.
Grounds
Adrian
A
Institute of Criminology and Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, UK. ag113@cam.ac.uk
D035082:Federal Government; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016134:Organizational Policy; D011057:Politics; D006113:United Kingdom; D014481:United States