Undermining of enamel as a mechanism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study.
Many workers have suggested that abfraction lesion formation is caused by the physical overloading of enamel. However, an alternative mechanism, involving undermining of the cervical enamel along the amelodentinal junction (ADJ), may be a more realistic explanation. The aim of this study was to examine what effect undermining of the buccal cervical enamel would have on the stress distribution in upper teeth. Two-dimensional plain strain finite element meshes of an upper incisor, canine and first premolar and the supporting periodontal ligament and alveolar bone were developed. Each tooth was loaded with an oblique 100 N load, and the nodal maximum principal stresses (MPS) along a buccal horizontal sampling plane 1.1 mm above the amelo-cemental junction was measured. A discontinuity between the cervical enamel and dentine elements was then introduced (0.1 mm wide) using gap elements. The vertical extent of this defect varied from 0.1 to 0.5 mm. The value of the MPS varied from 1.8 to 209 Mpa, and the lowest values were found for the intact teeth (range 0.6-30.3 MPa). The discontinuity caused a dramatic increase in the numerical values of the MPS, and in many instances these exceeded the known failure stress for enamel.
Rees
J S
JS
Department of Adult Dental Health, Dental School, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, UK. reesjs1@cf.ac.uk
Hammadeh
M
M
D001641:Bicuspid / Q000503:physiopathology; D001732:Bite Force; D019245:Compressive Strength; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003481:Cuspid / Q000503:physiopathology; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis / Q000379:methods; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor / Q000503:physiopathology; D008437:Maxilla; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014072:Tooth Abrasion / Q000503:physiopathology*; D019237:Tooth Cervix / Q000473:pathology