Corrections of clinical chemistry test results in a laboratory information system.
BACKGROUND
The recently released reports by the Institute of Medicine, To Err Is Human and Patient Safety, have received national attention because of their focus on the problem of medical errors. Although a small number of studies have reported on errors in general clinical laboratories, there are, to our knowledge, no reported studies that focus on errors in pediatric clinical laboratory testing.


OBJECTIVE
To characterize the errors that have caused corrections to have to be made in pediatric clinical chemistry results in the laboratory information system, Misys. To provide initial data on the errors detected in pediatric clinical chemistry laboratories in order to improve patient safety in pediatric health care.


METHODS
All clinical chemistry staff members were informed of the study and were requested to report in writing when a correction was made in the laboratory information system, Misys. Errors were detected either by the clinicians (the results did not fit the patients' clinical conditions) or by the laboratory technologists (the results were double-checked, and the worksheets were carefully examined twice a day). No incident that was discovered before or during the final validation was included. On each Monday of the study, we generated a report from Misys that listed all of the corrections made during the previous week. We then categorized the corrections according to the types and stages of the incidents that led to the corrections.


RESULTS
A total of 187 incidents were detected during the 10-month study, representing a 0.26% error detection rate per requisition. The distribution of the detected incidents included 31 (17%) preanalytic incidents, 46 (25%) analytic incidents, and 110 (59%) postanalytic incidents. The errors related to noninterfaced tests accounted for 50% of the total incidents and for 37% of the affected tests and orderable panels, while the noninterfaced tests and panels accounted for 17% of the total test volume in our laboratory.


CONCLUSIONS
This pilot study provided the rate and categories of errors detected in a pediatric clinical chemistry laboratory based on the corrections of results in the laboratory information system. A direct interface of the instruments to the laboratory information system showed that it had favorable effects on reducing laboratory errors.
Wang
Sihe
S
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill, USA. swang@childrensmemorial.org
Ho
Virginia
V
D002648:Child; D019963:Clinical Chemistry Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D002984:Clinical Laboratory Information Systems / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004868:Equipment Failure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005568:Forms and Records Control; D006776:Hospitals, Pediatric / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006785:Hospitals, University / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008499:Medical Records / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012308:Risk Management; D012449:Safety