Readers' sensitivity to linguistic cues in narratives: how salience influences anaphor resolution.
Despite the general assumption that anaphoric inferences are necessary inferences, Levine, Guzmán, and Klin (2000) concluded that the probability of resolving noun phrase anaphors depends both on the degree of accessibility in memory of the antecedent concepts and the extent to which resolution is necessary to create a coherent discourse representation. Four experiments are presented in which the factors that influence readers' standard of coherence are investigated. We examine the hypothesis that readers are more likely to resolve anaphors that are perceived as salient; salience was manipulated both with a syntactic focusing structure (wh- clefts) and with the addition of prenominal adjectival modifiers. The results of a probe recognition time task provide support for the hypothesis that a variety of linguistic cues serve as mental processing instructions (Givón, 1992), which instruct readers as to how much attention to devote to processing.
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton, New York 13902-6000, USA. cklin@binghamton.edu
Celia M
CM
Klin
Kristin M
KM
Weingartner
Alexandria E
AE
Guzmán
William H
WH
Levine
D003071:Cognition; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D033262:Narration; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D014825:Vocabulary