The appropriateness and use of focus group methodology across international mental health communities.
The ability to interpret collected data across international mental health communities often proves to be difficult. The following paper reports on the use and appropriateness of focus group methodology in helping to clarify issues that could help substantiate data collection and comparison across different cultures and regions. Field tests of the focus group methodology were undertaken in different regions and this paper describes an overview of the final field test in Sofia, Bulgaria. The findings and experiences with utilizing this methodology were incorporated in subsequent data collections.
Schilder
Klaas
K
Consortium Center for Public Mental Health, Maastricht, The Netherlands. kschilder@ccpmh.net
Tomov
Toma
T
Mladenova
M
M
Mayeya
John
J
Jenkins
Rachel
R
Gulbinat
Walter
W
Manderscheid
Ron
R
Baingana
Florence
F
Whiteford
Harvey
H
Khandelval
Sudhir
S
Minoletti
Alberto
A
Mubbashar
Malik H
MH
Srinivasa Murthy
R
R
Parameshvara Deva
M
M
Baba
Aliko
A
Townsend
Clare
C
Sakuta
T
T
D001294:Attitude to Health; D002031:Bulgaria; D003256:Community Participation; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups / Q000379:methods*; D014943:Global Health; D006126:Group Processes; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012737:Sex Factors; D012941:Social Responsibility