In vitro development following one-step dilution of OPS-vitrified porcine blastocysts.
The objective of this experiment was to compare the in vitro survival and hatching rates of OPS-vitrified porcine blastocysts obtained after conventional (three-step dilution) or direct (one-step dilution) warming procedures. Expanded blastocysts were collected by laparotomy from weaned crossbred sows (n=7) on Day 6 of the cycle (D0: onset of estrus). Vitrification was performed as described by Berthelot et al. [Cryobiology 41 (2000) 116] using 17% (v/v) ethylene glycol and 17% (v/v) dimethyl-sulfoxide in the second vitrification medium. Conventional warming was carried out by plunging straws containing embryos in 800 microl of TCM199 Hepes containing 20% new born calf serum (TCM-NBCS) and 0.13 M sucrose for 1 min. Embryos were then transferred to another well with the same medium for 5 min, washed in TCM-NBCS with 0.075 M sucrose for 5 min and transferred to TCM-NBCS for 5 min. In one-step dilution, embryos were placed in 400 microl TCM-NBCS containing 0.13 M sucrose. To evaluate in vitro development, embryos warmed by conventional (n=59) or direct (n=58) procedures were cultured for 96 h. Non-vitrified embryos were used as controls (n=20). No significant (P>0.05) differences were observed in the in vitro development of vitrified and non-vitrified embryos. The survival and hatching rates obtained by three-step dilution (84.8 and 71.2%, respectively) and one-step dilution (86.2 and 74.1%, respectively) procedures were not different (P>0.05). The average diameter of expanded blastocysts from each donor was significantly different (P<0.001) among embryo donors. The embryo diameter or the interactions among the factors evaluated did not affect (P>0.05) the embryo survival and hatching of the vitrified/warmed blastocysts. However, the donor of embryos had a significant effect (P<0.001) on these parameters, confirming previous experiments. This experiment shows that porcine embryo vitrification and one-step dilution are promising procedures to be used under field conditions. However, the good results obtained in vitro must be confirmed also by in vivo experiments.
Cuello
Cristina
C
Departamento Medicina y Cirugía Animal (Reproducción y Obstetricia), Hospital Clínico Veterinario, Universidad de Murcia, Murcia E-30071, Spain. ccuello@um.es
Gil
M Antonia
MA
Parrilla
Inmaculada
I
Tornel
Jose
J
Vázquez
Juan M
JM
Roca
Jordi
J
Berthelot
Françoise
F
Martinat-Botté
Françoise
F
Martínez
Emilio A
EA
D000818:Animals; D001755:Blastocyst / Q000502:physiology*; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D046508:Culture Techniques; D005314:Embryonic and Fetal Development; D005260:Female; D006358:Hot Temperature; D010060:Ovulation; D011247:Pregnancy; D013552:Swine / Q000196:embryology*; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000662:veterinary