Influence of concentrate composition and forage type on retail packaged beef quality.
The objective of this study was to determine the effect of type of conserved forage and concentrate composition on the quality of beef held in overwrapped (aerobic) or modified atmosphere packaging under simulated retail display for 17 d. Friesian steers (n = 45) were assigned randomly to one of five dietary treatments: 1) extensively fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate (EFS); 2) restricted fermented grass silage plus silage concentrate (RFS); 3) starch-based concentrate plus wheat straw (SC); 4) nonstarch-based concentrate plus wheat straw (NSC); or 5) zero-grazed perennial ryegrass plus grass concentrate (RYE). Meat quality was determined by measuring color, lipid oxidation (TBARS), alpha-tocopherol concentrations, and fatty acid composition. In aerobically packaged beef, there was a display x diet interactive effect (P < 0.001) on Hunter a* values, with steaks from the EFS group having higher (P < 0.05) a* values than all other dietary groups from d 6 through d 17. Moreover, during the last 12 d of display, beef from the EFS group had the lowest (P < 0.01) proportion of metmyoglobin (display day x diet; P < 0.001). Under aerobic packaging, the SC and NSC groups produced steaks with higher (P < 0.05) TBARS values than RFS, EFS, and RYE groups, which did not differ from each other (display day x diet; P < 0.01). The SC and NSC groups had higher (P < 0.05) oxidation levels than RFS, EFS, and RYE groups, which did not differ from each other. Beef from the EFS group had (P < 0.05) higher concentrations of alpha-tocopherol than from the SC, NSC, and RYE groups. Beef from EFS-fed steers had a higher (P < 0.05) proportion of saturated fatty acids than the SC and NSC groups. It was concluded that the method of grass conservation influenced beef color, whereas concentrate composition did not. Color of aerobically packaged beef was improved by feeding animals silage that had undergone extensive fermentation. Conversely, oxidative stability was decreased by feeding animals starch- and nonstarch-based concentrate diets.
O'Sullivan
A
A
Department of Food Science and Technology, University College, Cork, Ireland. aosullivan@fsai.ie
O'Sullivan
K
K
Galvin
K
K
Moloney
A P
AP
Troy
D J
DJ
Kerry
J P
JP
D000821:Animal Feed; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D000975:Antioxidants / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D002417:Cattle / Q000378:metabolism*; D005227:Fatty Acids / Q000032:analysis; D005285:Fermentation; D018857:Food Packaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008460:Meat / Q000592:standards*; D008786:Metmyoglobin / Q000378:metabolism; D010100:Oxygen / Q000378:metabolism*; D010858:Pigmentation; D006109:Poaceae; D011897:Random Allocation; D012820:Silage; D017392:Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances / Q000032:analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D014908:Triticum; D024502:alpha-Tocopherol / Q000032:analysis
D000975:Antioxidants; D005227:Fatty Acids; D017392:Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances; D008786:Metmyoglobin; D024502:alpha-Tocopherol; D010100:Oxygen