title: [Evaluation of quantitative fit-testing of N95 filtering facepiece respirators using Mask-Fitting Tester and improvement of mask fitting by instruction].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate quantitative fitness of N95 filtering facepiece respirators (N95 Mask) using Mask Fitting Tester and improvement of fitness by instruction.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred and thirty-three health care workers working at our hospital were tested as to quantitative fitness of N95 Mask using Mask Fitting Tester Model MT-02, Roken type that counts particles more than 0.7 microm in diameter. Based on counting the number of particles more than 0.7 microm in diameter of the air inside and outside the mask, leakage rate is calculated. Permissible range of leakage rate is 10% or below. In case of leakage rate more than 10%, we instructed way of wearing N95 Mask or change a type of N95 Mask. We usually provide three types of N95 Mask.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Eighty-seven (65.4%) out of 133 health care workers achieved leakage rate 10% or below at the first test. Forty-six (34.6%) who did not achieve leakage rate 10% or below at the first test received instruction or changed a mask type. Twenty-one (15.8%) achieved desired value by instruction and 19 (14.3%) by changing a mask type. But 6 (4.5 %) could not achieve desired value in spite of instruction or changing to another type of masks available to us. Leakage rate changed from 20.5 +/- 10.9% (10.1-58.6) to 6.3 +/- 4.9% (0-29.5) by instruction or changing a type of mask (p < 0.001). At the first test, mask fitness is better in male than female, and worse in workers who always use N95 Mask at isolation ward or laboratory room than workers who usually do not use N95 Mask. Main problems were choice of mask, fitness to nose, incorrect use of headband.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It is useful to evaluate N95 Mask quantitative fitness using Mask Fitting Tester Model MT-02, Roken type. At the first test, 34.6% of health care workers have large amount of leakage more than 10%, and by instruction or changing a mask type, most of them could achieve 10% or below. But 4.5% could not achieve desired value. On Infection control, it is important to test quantitative fitness of N95 Mask and to provide more than three types of N95 Mask.
authors.affiliation: Department of Respiratory Disease, National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital, Japan. kawabe@tokyo.hosp.go.jp
authors.forename: Yoshiko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Kawabe
authors.forename: Shigeru
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tanaka
authors.forename: Hideaki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Nagai
authors.forename: Junko
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Suzuki
authors.forename: Atsuhisa
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tamura
authors.forename: Naohiro
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Nagayama
authors.forename: Shinobu
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Akagawa
authors.forename: Kazuko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Machida
authors.forename: Atsuyuki
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kurashima
authors.forename: Hideki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yotsumoto
mesh_terms: D004867:Equipment Design; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D005374:Filtration; D006801:Humans; D017053:Infection Control / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008297:Male; D008397:Masks / Q000592:standards*; D008422:Materials Testing; D016272:Occupational Health; D012134:Respiratory Protective Devices; D017132:Workplace