Efficacy and tolerability of lanreotide Autogel therapy in acromegalic patients previously treated with octreotide LAR.
OBJECTIVE
This open label, multicentre study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lanreotide Autogel (L-Autogel) in acromegalic patients over a 24-week period. The outcome of treatment with this new, long-acting, aqueous formulation of lanreotide was also compared with the patients' previous treatment with octreotide long acting repeatable (LAR).


METHODS
Twenty-five acromegalic patients (13 males, mean age 51+/-12 years) were switched from octreotide LAR (20-40 mg/4 weeks for at least 6 months) to L-Autogel, given deep subcutaneously at a fixed dose of 90 mg/4 weeks. After 12 weeks, the dose of L-Autogel was titrated according to patients' mean GH and IGF-I levels at week 8. It was increased to 120 mg/4 weeks if GH>2.5 microg/l or if IGF-I was above the age-adjusted normal range. It was reduced to 60 mg/4 weeks if mean GH<1 microg/l and IGF-I was within the normal range. If the values did not fall within these ranges, the dose remained unchanged at 90 mg.


RESULTS
After 24 weeks of treatment with L-Autogel (final doses 60 mg in 3 patients, 90 mg in 4 patients and 120 mg in 18 patients), mean serum GH (2.9+/-2.4 microg/l) and IGF-I concentrations (332+/-193 microg/l) remained statistically unchanged when compared with baseline values under octreotide LAR (GH 2.4+/-1.8 microg/l and IGF-I 337+/-201 microg/l, non significant (NS)). There was a significant improvement of the acromegalic symptom score over the study period, from 4.8+/-3.4 to 2.8+/-2.5 (P<0.001) and a small but significant reduction in the residual pituitary tumour volume (P<0.05). Local side-effects were observed less frequently and no technical problems were encountered with the L-Autogel injections, as opposed to treatment with octreotide LAR (60 difficult injections/150 (P<0.001)).


CONCLUSIONS
L-Autogel appears to be as effective as octreotide LAR in lowering GH and IGF-I concentrations in acromegalic patients. This treatment was also well tolerated by the patients, giving fewer local side-effects and technical problems with injections. These advantages may improve the long-term acceptability of medical treatment in acromegaly.
Alexopoulou
O
O
Department of Endocrinology, UCL-St Luc Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. orsalia.alexopoulou@diab.ucl.ac.be
Abrams
P
P
Verhelst
J
J
Poppe
K
K
Velkeniers
B
B
Abs
R
R
Maiter
D
D
D000172:Acromegaly / Q000097:blood / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000473:pathology; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D019382:Human Growth Hormone / Q000097:blood; D006801:Humans; D007279:Injections, Subcutaneous; D007334:Insulin-Like Growth Factor I / Q000378:metabolism; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015282:Octreotide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D010456:Peptides, Cyclic / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D010911:Pituitary Neoplasms / Q000097:blood / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000473:pathology; D013004:Somatostatin / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000031:analogs & derivatives
D000970:Antineoplastic Agents; D010456:Peptides, Cyclic; C060347:lanreotide; D019382:Human Growth Hormone; D013004:Somatostatin; D007334:Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; D015282:Octreotide