title: A comparison of step-and-shoot leaf sequencing algorithms that eliminate tongue-and-groove effects.
abstract: The performances of three recently published leaf sequencing algorithms for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery that eliminates tongue-and-groove underdosage are evaluated. Proofs are given to show that the algorithm of Que et al (2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 399-405) generates leaf sequences free of tongue-and-groove underdosage and interdigitation. However, the total beam-on times could be up to n times those of the sequences generated by the algorithms of Kamath et al (2004 Phys. Med. Biol. 49 N7-N19), which are optimal in beam-on time for unidirectional leaf movement under the same constraints, where n is the total number of involved leaf pairs. Using 19 clinical fluence matrices and 100000 randomly generated 15 x 15 matrices, the average monitor units and number of segments of the leaf sequences generated using the algorithm of Que et al are about two to four times those generated by the algorithm of Kamath et al.
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer and Information Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. srkamath@cise.ufl.edu
authors.forename: Srijit
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kamath
authors.forename: Sartaj
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sahni
authors.forename: Sanjay
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ranka
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Jatinder
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Palta
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D006801:Humans; D011874:Radiometry / Q000379:methods*; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D020266:Radiotherapy, Conformal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D012984:Software; D013997:Time Factors