title: Reality compared with its alternatives: age differences in judgments of regret and relief.
abstract: Three experiments examined developmental change in children's understanding of regret and relief, two second-order emotions whose quality depends on a comparison between reality and "what might have been." In Experiment 1, participants 7 years of age and older, but not 5-year-olds, made regret-related emotion-response judgments that took into account a comparison of reality with its alternatives. In Experiment 2, 5-year-olds judged that an individual would feel better, rather than worse, when a counterfactual outcome was better than what actually occurred (the opposite of the pattern found with older children and adults). Experiment 3 focused on the understanding of relief. In contrast to the findings from Experiment I, the 7-year-olds in Experiment 3 made their judgments solely on the basis of what actually occurred.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greesboro, Greensboro, NC, USA 27402. rob_guttentag@uncg.edu
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Guttentag
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ferrell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D002657:Child Development; D002675:Child, Preschool; D032882:Comprehension; D003210:Concept Formation; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011932:Reading; D011936:Reality Testing; D013067:Speech Perception