Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.
Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods have been widely applied in drug discovery, lead optimization, toxicity prediction, and regulatory decisions. Despite major advances in algorithms and software, QSAR models have inherent limitations associated with a size and chemical-structure diversity of the training set, experimental error, and many characteristics of structure representation and correlation algorithms. Whereas excellent fit to the training data may be readily attainable, often models fail to predict accurately chemicals that are outside their domain of applicability. A QSAR's utility and, in the case of regulatory decisions, justification for usage increasingly depend on the ability to quantify a model's potential for predicting unknown chemicals with some known degree of certainty. It is never possible to predict an unknown chemical with absolute certainty. Here we report on two QSAR models based on different data sets for classification of chemicals according to their ability to bind to the estrogen receptor. The models were developed by using a novel QSAR method, Decision Forest, which combines the results of multiple heterogeneous but comparable Decision Tree models to produce a consensus prediction. We used an extensive cross-validation process to define an applicability domain for model predictions based on two quantitative measures: prediction confidence and domain extrapolation. Together, these measures quantify the accuracy of each prediction within and outside of the training domain. Despite being based on large and diverse training sets, both QSAR models had poor accuracy for chemicals within the domain of low confidence, whereas good accuracy was obtained for those within the domain of high confidence. For prediction in the high confidence domain, accuracy was inversely proportional to the degree of domain extrapolation. The model with a larger training set of 1,092, compared with 232 for the other, was more accurate in predicting chemicals at larger domain extrapolation, and could be particularly useful for rapidly prioritizing potential endocrine disruptors from large chemical universe.
Tong
Weida
W
Center for Toxicoinformatics, National Center for Toxicological Research, Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA. wtong@nctr.fda.gov
Xie
Qian
Q
Hong
Huixiao
H
Shi
Leming
L
Fang
Hong
H
Perkins
Roger
R
D000818:Animals; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004703:Endocrine System / Q000187:drug effects; D004777:Environment; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity*; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011050:Policy Making; D021281:Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship; D011960:Receptors, Estrogen / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012984:Software; D043922:Toxicogenetics / Q000379:methods
D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D011960:Receptors, Estrogen