title: Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols.
abstract: Charring of organic carbon (OC) during thermal/optical analysis is monitored by the change in a laser signal either reflected from or transmitted through a filter punch. Elemental carbon (EC) in suspended particulate matter collected on quartz-fiber filters is defined as the carbon that evolves after the detected optical signal attains the value it had prior to commencement of heating, with the rest of the carbon classified as organic carbon (OC). Heretofore, operational definitions of EC were believed to be caused by different temperature protocols rather than by the method of monitoring charring. This work demonstrates that thermal/ optical reflectance (TOR) corrections yield equivalent OC/ EC splits for widely divergent temperature protocols. EC results determined by simultaneous thermal/optical transmittance (TOT) corrections are 30% lower than TOR for the same temperature protocol and 70-80% lower than TOR for a protocol with higher heating temperatures and shorter residence times. This is true for 58 urban samples from Fresno, CA, as well as for 30 samples from the nonurban IMPROVE network that are individually dominated by wildfire, vehicle exhaust, secondary organic aerosol, and calcium carbonate contributions. Visual examination of filter darkening at different temperature stages shows that substantial charring takes place within the filter, possibly due to adsorbed organic gases or diffusion of vaporized particles. The filter transmittance is more influenced by the within-filter char, whereas the filter reflectance is dominated by charring of the near-surface deposit that appears to evolve first when oxygen is added to helium in the analysis atmosphere for these samples. The amounts of charred OC (POC) and EC are also estimated from incremental absorbance. Small amounts of POC are found to dominate the incremental absorbance. EC estimated from absorbance are found to agree better with EC from the reflectance charring correction than with EC from the transmittance charring correction.
authors.affiliation: Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada 89512, USA. judy.chow@dri.edu
authors.forename: Judith C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Chow
authors.forename: John G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Watson
authors.forename: L W Antony
authors.initials: LW
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: W Patrick
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Arnott
authors.forename: Hans
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Moosmüller
authors.forename: Kochy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Fung
mesh_terms: D000327:Adsorption; D002244:Carbon / Q000737:chemistry*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D005374:Filtration; D055095:Optics and Photonics; D013696:Temperature
chemical_list: D002244:Carbon