'Irrational' stated preferences: a quantitative and qualitative investigation.
Individuals' rationality has been a key issue long debated in Economics. While normative theories establish the way 'rational' consumers should behave, many empirical studies have documented numerous systematic violations of normative principles. This has led some to question the validity of classic economic models as an adequate approximation of individuals' real decision-making. This paper aims to shed more light on this debate. A stated preference choice experiment was set up to test rational choice properties. Attention was given to the extent to which satisfaction of such tests is related to both the complexity of the design, and subject characteristics. Quantitative and qualitative methods are applied. The majority of respondents passed the rationality tests. Satisfaction of the tests was sensitive to normatively irrelevant factors such as the complexity of the task and demographic characteristics. A significant proportion of those individuals who 'failed' seem to have reformulated the experiment in some way in their mental process. Implications for the design and analyses of future DCEs are discussed.
Miguel
Fernando San
FS
Institución Futuro, Plaza del Palacio de Gorraiz, Navarra, Spain. fs@institucionfuturo.org
Ryan
Mandy
M
Amaya-Amaya
Mabelle
M
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018803:Models, Economic; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires