title: Comparison of echo and MRI in the imaging evaluation of intracardiac masses.
abstract: We compared the efficacy of echocardiography (ECHO) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluating intracardiac masses. Over an 8-yr period, 28 patients, 21 males, 7 females, 16 days-60 years of age (mean 25 years) with a suspected intracardiac mass on ECHO (transthoracic in all; transesophageal in 9) underwent an MRI examination. Five patients had a contrast-enhanced MRI. ECHO and MRI were compared with respect to their technical adequacy, ability to detect and suggest the likely etiology of the mass, and provide additional information (masses not seen with the other technique, inflow or outflow obstruction, and intramural component of an intracavitary mass). With MRI, the image morphology (including signal intensity changes on the various sequences) and extracardiac manifestations were also evaluated. The diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology in 18, surgical inspection in 4, by follow- up imaging on conservative management in 5, and by typical extracardiac manifestations of the disease in 1 patient. Fifteen (54%) patients had tumors (benign 12, malignant 3), 5 had a thrombus or hematoma, and 4 each had infective or vascular lesions. Thirty-four masses (13 in ventricle, 11 septal, 7 atrial, 2 on valve and 1 in pulmonary artery) were seen on MRI, 28 of which were detected by ECHO. Transthoracic ECHO (TTE) and MRI were technically optimal in 82% and 100% of cases, respectively. Nine patients needed an additional transesophageal ECHO (TEE). Overall, MRI showed a mass in all patients, whereas ECHO missed it in 2 cases. In cases with a mass on both modalities, MRI detected 4 additional masses not seen on ECHO. MRI suggested the etiology in 21 (75%) cases, while the same was possible with ECHO (TTE and TEE) in 8 (29%) cases. Intramural component, extension into the inflow or outflow, outflow tract obstruction, and associated pericardial or extracardiac masses were better depicted on MRI. We conclude that MRI is advantageous over a combination of TTE and TEE for the detection and complete morphological and functional evaluation (hemodynamic effects) of cardiac masses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiovascular Radiology, Cardiothoracic Centre, New Delhi, India. gulatigurpreet@rediffmail.com
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Gulati
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sharma
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Kothari
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Juneja
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Saxena
authors.forename: K K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Talwar
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002292:Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Q000175:diagnosis; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004452:Echocardiography; D005260:Female; D005350:Fibroma / Q000175:diagnosis; D006338:Heart Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology; D006391:Hemangioma / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008067:Lipoma / Q000175:diagnosis; D008223:Lymphoma / Q000175:diagnosis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009232:Myxoma / Q000175:diagnosis; D012207:Rhabdomyoma / Q000175:diagnosis; D012509:Sarcoma / Q000175:diagnosis