title: Institutional frameworks for sustainability? A comparative analysis of the forest sectors of Russia and the Baltic States.
abstract: After the break-up of the Soviet system, the divergence in forest management among Soviet republics became obvious. While the forest sectors of the Baltic States have been fundamentally changed, Russia has not been able to develop an institutional framework that would fit the prerequisites for social-ecological resilience. It is argued that sustainable development requires institutional frameworks that have the capacity to adapt and learn, and thus to treat policies as experiments that are constantly assessed and readjusted. This, however, requires a participatory approach and in this respect the Baltic States are believed to be on a more promising track. Finally, it is concluded that only to the extent that suitable institutional frameworks will be developed will social-ecological resilience be a significant feature of the natural resources management in the former communist countries.
authors.affiliation: Lulea University of Technology, Department of Business Administration and Social Science, Sweden. lars.carlsson@ies.luth.se
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Carlsson
authors.forename: Marius
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lazdinis
mesh_terms: D001454:Baltic States; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D004463:Ecology; D004777:Environment; D006801:Humans; D012426:Russia; D012924:Social Conditions; D014197:Trees