title: Displacement and sweep efficiencies in a DNAPL recovery test using micellar and polymer solutions injected in a five-spot pattern.
abstract: Soil washing with micellar solutions is a promising alternative for the remediation of DNAPL source zones. As with any flushing technology, the success of soil washing with micellar solutions depends in a very large part on the ability of the solution to contact the contaminant (sweep efficiency) and then on the efficiency of contaminant removal once this contact is made (displacement efficiency). We report here on a field test where a micellar solution was used to recover a DNAPL in an open five-spot pattern in which polymer solutions were also injected before and after the washing solution to improve sweep efficiency. The washing solution formulation was optimised in the laboratory prior to the test to obtain good dissolution capacity. For a high-concentration and low-volume soil flushing remediation test such as the one performed (0.8 pore volumes of actual washing solution injected), slug sizing of the washing solution is critical. It was evaluated by an analytical solution. In a five-spot pattern, the displacement efficiency of the washing solution was observed to vary in the porous medium as a function of the radial distance from the injection well because: (1) the volume of the washing solution flowing through a section of the test cell changes (maximum close to the injection well and minimal at the pumping wells); (2) the in situ velocity changes (maximum at the wells and minimum between the wells) and; (3) the contact time of the washing solution with the NAPL changes as a function of the distance from the injection well. The relative importance of the recovery mechanisms, mobilisation and dissolution, was also observed to vary in the test cell. The reduced velocity increased the contact time of the washing solution with the DNAPL enhancing its dissolution, but the decrease of the capillary number caused less mobilisation. The washing process is much more extensive around the injection well. The use of an injection-pumping pattern allowing a complete sweep of the remediated area is essential. Following a comprehensive characterisation, modeling is an efficient tool to design the injection-pumping scheme and to optimise injection and pumping rates providing the best areal sweep. The vertical sweep can be controlled by using a polymer solution (Xanthan gum). The polymer solution also has a positive effect on front stability between the solutions injected. The injection rate of the polymer solution that follows the washing solution must be kept minimal initially to prevent dilution of the washing solution by fingering.
authors.affiliation: INRS-Eau, Terre et Environnement, Institut national de la recherche scientifique, Université du Québec, 880 Chemin Sainte-Foy, C.P. 7500, Sainte-Foy, Québec, Canada G1V 4C7. Richard_Martel@inrs-ete.uquebec.ca <Richard_Martel@inrs-ete.uquebec.ca>
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Martel
authors.forename: Alain
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hébert
authors.forename: René
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lefebvre
authors.forename: Pierre
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Gélinas
authors.forename: Uta
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Gabriel
mesh_terms: D007700:Kinetics; D008823:Micelles; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010316:Particle Size; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry*; D011135:Polysaccharides, Bacterial / Q000737:chemistry*; D016062:Porosity; D012996:Solutions / Q000737:chemistry; D013501:Surface-Active Agents / Q000737:chemistry*; D014872:Water Movements; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D018508:Water Purification
chemical_list: D008823:Micelles; D011108:Polymers; D011135:Polysaccharides, Bacterial; D012996:Solutions; D013501:Surface-Active Agents; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; C002563:xanthan gum