title: In vivo embryo recovery rate by laparoscopic technique from rabbit does selected for growth rate.
abstract: Rabbit does from R line selected for growth rate present a low reproductive performance and this study aimed to evaluate both the recovery efficacy and viability of recovered embryos after vitrification and the reproductive performance of donor does subjected to in vivo recovery. Does were divided into three groups: 28 does without in vivo recovery (control), 25 does in which in vivo recovery was started in the nulliparous state (group 1) and 30 does with at least one litter before in vivo recovery (group 2). Does were superovulated with a single subcutaneous injection of 50 IU of equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) per female, and were then artificially inseminated 60 h later and immediately administered an intravenous dose of 75 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) per female. Does from group 1 and 2 were recovered in vivo 76-80 h post-insemination by repeated laparoscopies at one to four times and permitted one or two parturitions between recoveries [in vivo (IV) recovery]. At the end of the experiment, about 16 does of all groups were recovered post-mortem (PM recovery). All normal embryos were vitrified, devitrified and then cultivated in vitro to evaluate the viability after thawing. A significant increase in the ovulation rate was found in does recovered PM than in those recovered IV in the nulliparous state. However, no significant differences were observed in the recovery rate, the donor rate, the number of normal embryos recovered with at least one normal embryo per doe and the viability after thawing between the PM and IV groups. A significant decrease in the fertility rate, total born, live born and weaned kids was found for does from group 1 in comparison with does from group 2. Results support the use of repeated laparoscopy to increase the number of recovered embryos per donor doe especially in such R line does, if they are permitted to produce at least one litter before the beginning of in vivo recovery.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Ciencia Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain. gamoka@dca.upv.es
authors.forename: G M K
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Mehaisen
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Vicente
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lavara
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D004624:Embryo Transfer / Q000662:veterinary*; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D006064:Gonadotropins, Equine / Q000494:pharmacology; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D018587:Oocyte Donation / Q000662:veterinary; D010062:Ovulation Induction / Q000662:veterinary; D010298:Parity / Q000502:physiology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011817:Rabbits / Q000196:embryology* / Q000502:physiology; D011897:Random Allocation; D013480:Superovulation
chemical_list: D006064:Gonadotropins, Equine