The influence of individual low back health status on workplace trunk kinematics and risk of low back disorder.
A case-control study was conducted to determine whether or not kinematic-based low back disorder risk measurement (Marras et al. 1993) of the job was significantly different for those workers suffering from recent low back injuries compared to asymptomatic controls. Two hundred low back injured workers returning to full duty work and 200 asymptomatic controls were evaluated while performing the same job. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups on any trunk motion measures or workplace measures. Therefore, job design is dictating the kinematic motions of the torso and not the worker's low back health. In addition, there was not a significant difference in job risk estimates using the lumbar motion monitor risk model. The mean risk (and standard deviation) for the low back injured group and the asymptomatic controls was 0.502 (0.178) and 0.501 (0.193), respectively. This study suggests that trunk kinematics and subsequent risk estimates are dictated primarily by job design and not influenced by the low back health status of the worker.
Ferguson
Sue A
SA
Institute for Ergonomics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA. Ferguson.4@osu.edu
Marras
William S
WS
Burr
Deborah L
DL
D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D006804:Ergonomics; D006304:Health Status; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D017132:Workplace