[Ethical, legal and social issues on regenerative medicine].
There should have been it for the purpose of the severe handling opening meatus for done study after "The law concerning regulation relating to human cloning techniques and other similar techniques" paid its attention to medical utility of "specified embryo", and having forbidden transplantation to prenatal. There is a problem and asks a law and consistency with "The guidelines for handling of specified embryo" it and, despite the duration, does not get skill. If an ES cell, tissue stem cell and human clone embryo can cry in subject of study as the Trinity, it is not possible for those availability and evaluation of safety. Study of regenerative medicine does not consist last if does not use a cell having gamete, germ, an embryo and the specific character which said. We attention to utility of regenerative medicine and takes a national strategic part, correspondence supporting development of steady study is demanded. The result is reduced to its elements in the future by society.
Tsukata
Yukiyoshi
Y
Department of Biomedical Ethics and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D012038:Regeneration / Q000502:physiology; D044968:Regenerative Medicine / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends; D012106:Research; D033581:Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013234:Stem Cells