Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions.
The purpose of the study was to compare the detection performance of a cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor versus a liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor for simulated subtle pulmonary lesions. Ten templates containing simulated lung lesions were superimposed on an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Posteroanterior radiographs were obtained using flat panel technology and were displayed on a CRT and an LCD monitor. Image processing and reading conditions were equivalent for both softcopy displays. Five observers assessed lesion detectability using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) methodology. A multivariate test (Pillai trace) was used to test the significance of differences (P<0.05). The multivariate test revealed significantly different detection rates for the lesion types, but no significant difference between the two display modes. Detection performance for both monitors was higher for nodules and micro-nodules and lower for lines and patchy opacities. Analysis of lesion subgroups according to their location in lucent/obscured lung areas was also not statistically significant. Under ideal reading conditions, CRT and LCD displays perform equivalently for the detection of simulated subtle pulmonary lesions.
Oschatz
Elisabeth
E
Department of Radiology, Vienna General Hospital, University of Vienna, Austria. elisabeth.oschatz@wienkav.at
Prokop
Mathias
M
Scharitzer
Martina
M
Weber
Michael
M
Balassy
Csilla
C
Schaefer-Prokop
Cornelia
C
D003626:Data Display; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D008171:Lung Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D015588:Observer Variation; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D012372:ROC Curve; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement