Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: the unruly 10-12-second rule.
Data are reported from 3,213 research eyewitnesses confirming that accurate eyewitness identifications from lineups are made faster than are inaccurate identifications. However, consistent with predictions from the recognition and search literatures, the authors did not find support for the "10-12-s rule" in which lineup identifications faster than 10-12 s maximally discriminate between accurate and inaccurate identifications (D. Dunning & S. Perretta, 2002). Instead, the time frame that proved most discriminating was highly variable across experiments, ranging from 5 s to 29 s, and the maximally discriminating time was often unimpressive in its ability to sort accurate from inaccurate identifications. The authors suggest several factors that are likely to moderate the 10-12-s rule.
School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Nathan
N
Weber
Neil
N
Brewer
Gary L
GL
Wells
Carolyn
C
Semmler
Amber
A
Keast
D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003657:Decision Making; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D011939:Mental Recall; D011930:Reaction Time; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014743:Videotape Recording