[New forms of remuneration and care delivery: their impact on rehabilitation].
Current health policy reform efforts in Germany include introduction of a DRG (Diagnosis Related Group) based funding system in the hospital sector as well as integrated delivery of health care and disease management programs, developments that will directly affect the medical rehabilitation sector. Decreasing lengths of hospital stay induced by the DRG system will inter alia entail a shifting of cases and costs to subsequent sectors. Moreover, hospitals might not least seek compensation for shorter hospital stays by extending their scope to include rehabilitation and long-term care services. Introduction of the DRG system in acute-hospital care has resulted in major changes in respect of early rehabilitation. Existing specialized early rehabilitation facilities providing high-quality care face serious funding problems on account of the newly introduced early rehabilitation DRGs. For hospitals previously not involved in early rehabilitation on the other hand, incentives arise to set up new early rehabilitation structures although the need for these additional capacities obviously is questionable. Introduction of the DRG-based funding system has reinforced the discussion about applying a flat-rate system also in the rehabilitation sector. This form of remuneration however is inappropriate to medical rehabilitation concepts. On the other hand, a remuneration system incorporating cross-institutional per-diem fees and "treatment time" budgets might enable using essential advantages of flat-rate payment without having to expect repercussions for the quality of care. In the context of integrated care and disease management programs the issue at stake for rehabilitation primarily is to be able to contribute its specific competencies appropriately. Also, integrated health care is bound to result in stronger competition among the various health care sectors. If rehabilitation is set to face this competition, further research efforts will urgently have to be made along with ongoing development of clinical practice guidelines.
Haaf
H-G
HG
Rehabilitationswissenschaftliche Abteilung, Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger, Frankfurt/Main. hans-guenter.haaf@vdr.de
Volke
E
E
Schliehe
F
F
D002017:Budgets; D002202:Capital Financing / Q000191:economics; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000191:economics / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000191:economics; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000191:economics*; D019468:Disease Management; D005544:Forecasting; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000191:economics*; D011907:Rate Setting and Review / Q000639:trends*; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000191:economics*; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers / Q000191:economics