Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers: evidence from the SNARC effect.
Dehaene, Bossini, and Giraux (1993) revealed that subjects responded to large numbers faster with the choice on the right than with the choice on the left, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers (SNARC effect). According to Dehaene et al. (1993), the SNARC effect depends on the quantitative representation of number, such as a left-to-right-oriented analog number line. The main goal of the present study was twofold: first, to investigate whether the vertical SNARC effect could be observed, and, second, to verify whether Dehaene et al.'s (1993) explanation of the SNARC effect is correct. Experiments 2A and 2B showed the vertical SNARC effect in a parity judgment task. Subjects responded to large numbers faster with the top choice than with the bottom choice, whereas the reverse held true for small numbers. However, Experiment 3 failed to show the SNARC effect in a number magnitude judgment task, suggesting that the quantitative representation could be dissociated from the spatial code that produces the SNARC effect.
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasuhiro
Y
Ito
Takeshi
T
Hatta
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014796:Visual Perception