The tale is in the tail: an alternative hypothesis for psychophysical performance variability in dyslexia.
Dyslexic groups have been reported to display poorer mean performance than groups of normal readers on a variety of psychophysical tasks. However, inspection of the distribution of individual scores for each group typically reveals that the majority of dyslexic observers actually perform within the normal range. Differences between group means often reflect the influence of a small number of dyslexic individuals who perform very poorly. While such findings are typically interpreted as evidence for specific perceptual deficiencies in dyslexia, caution in this approach is necessary. In this study we examined how general difficulties with task completion might manifest themselves in group psychophysical studies. Simulations of the effect of errant or inattentive trials on performance produced patterns of variability similar to those seen in dyslexic groups. Additionally, predicted relationships between the relative variability in dyslexic and control groups, and the magnitude of group differences bore close resemblance to the outcomes of a meta-analysis of empirical studies. These results suggest that general, nonsensory difficulties may underlie the poor performance of dyslexic groups on many psychophysical tasks. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.
School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Australia.
Neil W
NW
Roach
Veronica T
VT
Edwards
John H
JH
Hogben
D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D004410:Dyslexia / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology; D010468:Perceptual Disorders / Q000150:complications / Q000503:physiopathology*; D011601:Psychophysics; D012684:Sensory Thresholds / Q000502:physiology; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*