[Comparison of the clinical effects of three root canal treatments.].
OBJECTIVE
To compare the clinical effects of three root canal treatments.


METHODS
The patients were randomly divided into A,B,C groups. Group A: profile preparation of the root canal, then the root canal was filled with maillefer thermafil. Group B: profile preparation of the root canal, iodoform cataplasm and gutta percha point was used to fill root canal. Group C: preparation of the root canal with stainless steel hand-operated root canal magnified instrument, iodoform cataplasm and gutta percha point was used to fill the root canal.


RESULTS
Through X ray and clinical evaluation, the root canal therapy result in group A was superior to group B, group B was superior to group C.


CONCLUSIONS
The work efficiency of preparative instrument of profile flexible nickel-titanium root canal is high. The successful rate of maillefer thermafil for results root canal therapy is superior to the other methods. Root canal preparation by profile can get satisfying effects.
Zheng
Qin-zhong
QZ
Department of Dentistry, Fengcheng Hospital, Fengxian District of Shanghai, Shanghai 201411, China.
Wang
Jian
J
Liu
Li-ming
LM
D001466:Barium Sulfate; D001729:Bismuth; D001881:Borates; D003786:Dental Pulp Cavity; D004338:Drug Combinations; D005054:Eugenol; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D006801:Humans; D009532:Nickel; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012389:Root Canal Obturation; D018915:Root Canal Preparation; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D013193:Stainless Steel; D014025:Titanium; D015034:Zinc Oxide
D001881:Borates; D004338:Drug Combinations; D012117:Resins, Synthetic; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; C040654:titanium nickelide; D013193:Stainless Steel; D001466:Barium Sulfate; D005054:Eugenol; D009532:Nickel; C038425:Fillcanal; D006171:Gutta-Percha; D014025:Titanium; D015034:Zinc Oxide; D001729:Bismuth