title: The Ohio study in light of national data and clinical experience.
abstract: The Siminoff, Burant, and Youngner study in Ohio is strikingly consistent with data from a national study. Both suggest that there might be significant public acceptance of future policies that violate the dead donor rule, or that further extend the boundary between life and death to include brain-damaged patients short of "brain death." Experience with donation suggests that many individuals would donate their loved ones' organs when they have concluded that the brain injury is not survivable, even if all the criteria for "brain death" are not met. It would be very helpful to have research on those who have gone through the real-life clinical situation. Based on the findings of this study and the increasing demand for organs, it may be appropriate for public policy to allow for ways to increase organ procurement from individuals who are not fully "brain dead" beyond the current method of procurement after cardiac death, but any change in this area should go slowly and with significant public input.
authors.affiliation: Intermountain Donor Services, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
authors.forename: Tracy C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Schmidt
mesh_terms: D001925:Brain Damage, Chronic; D001926:Brain Death; D003643:Death; D036262:Empirical Research; D005190:Family; D006801:Humans; D019520:Living Donors; D009820:Ohio; D011639:Public Opinion; D011640:Public Policy; D020458:Third-Party Consent; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000941:ethics*; D014481:United States