The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities.
The Boston University (BU) case illustrates how the psychometrics of ability differences interact with the concept of learning disability and with the sociopolitics of schooling and society. It also illustrates that learning disabilities advocacy will not be on a sound footing as long as the field refuses to rid itself of its IQ fetishism, refuses to jettison its fixation on aptitude-achievement discrepancy, and fails to free clinical practice from the pseudoscientific neurology that plagued the field in the 1970s. A more inclusive definition of learning disability--one that abandons discrepancy notions--and a more self-critical attitude toward its own claims would advance the field of learning disabilities and help to rid it of distractions such as the BU case.
Stanovich
K E
KE
Department of Human Development and Applied Psychology, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada.
D001077:Aptitude Tests; D004522:Educational Status; D006801:Humans; D007859:Learning Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D008404:Massachusetts; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D011057:Politics; D011594:Psychometrics; D011640:Public Policy; D012924:Social Conditions; D014495:Universities