title: Different effects of eyelid blinks and target blanking on saccadic suppression of displacement.
abstract: Displacements of visual stimuli during saccadic eye movements are often not noticed. We have demonstrated that saccadic suppression of image displacement can be eliminated by blanking the stimulus for a short period during and after the saccade (Deubel, Schneider, & Bridgeman, 1996). Here we report an experiment in which target visibility was interrupted after the saccade, either by distal target blanking or by voluntary eyeblink. The data show that the effect of blinking is different from blanking; interruption of vision due to a blink did not enable subjects to detect target displacements any better than they had done in the no-blank condition. The results provide evidence for an extraretinal signal that distinguishes between endogenous and exogenous sources of temporary object disappearance after the saccade.
authors.affiliation: Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany. deubel@psy.uni-muenchen.de
authors.forename: Heiner
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Deubel
authors.forename: Bruce
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bridgeman
authors.forename: Werner X
authors.initials: WX
authors.lastname: Schneider
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001767:Blinking / Q000502:physiology*; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005143:Eyelids / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception