title: House dust mite control measures for asthma.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The major allergen in house dust comes from mites. Chemical, physical and combined methods of reducing mite allergen levels are intended to reduce asthma symptoms in people who are sensitive to house dust mites.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effects of reducing exposure to house dust mite antigens in the homes of people with mite-sensitive asthma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cochrane Airways Group trials register, and PubMed and The Cochrane Library (last searches June 2004), reference lists.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised trials of mite control measures vs placebo or no treatment in asthmatic people known to be sensitive to house dust mites.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two reviewers applied the trial inclusion criteria, assessed their quality and extracted the data independently. Study authors were contacted to clarify information.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-nine trials (2733 patients) were included; the number of patients has more than doubled since the last version of this review. Thirty-one trials assessed physical methods, ten assessed chemical methods, and eight a combination of chemical and physical methods. Despite the fact that many trials were of poor quality and would be expected to exaggerate the reported effect, we did not find an effect of the interventions. For the most frequently reported outcome, peak flow in the morning (1339 patients), the standardised mean difference was -0.02 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 0.08). There were no statistically significant differences either in number of patients improved (relative risk 1.01, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.27), asthma symptom scores (standardised mean difference -0.01, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.13), or in medication usage (standardised mean difference -0.05, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.09).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Chemical and physical methods aimed at reducing exposure to house dust mite allergens cannot be recommended. It is doubtful whether further studies, similar to the ones in our meta-analysis, are worthwhile. If other types of studies are considered, they should be methodologically rigorous and use other methods than those used so far, with careful monitoring of mite exposure and relevant clinical outcomes.
authors.affiliation: Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Dept. 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, 2100.
authors.forename: P C
authors.initials: PC
authors.lastname: Gøtzsche
authors.forename: H K
authors.initials: HK
authors.lastname: Johansen
authors.forename: L M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Burr
mesh_terms: D000485:Allergens / Q000276:immunology*; D000818:Animals; D001249:Asthma / Q000276:immunology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004391:Dust; D004780:Environment, Controlled; D006801:Humans; D007306:Insecticides; D008925:Mites / Q000276:immunology*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
chemical_list: D000485:Allergens; D004391:Dust; D007306:Insecticides