Design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this article was to propose guidelines for the design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics. Study design We performed a PubMed search of economic evaluation articles to identify those articles that deal with the quality of published economic evaluation studies, the development of guidelines, and the development of checklists/guidelines for the reporting of economic evaluation studies. All other articles were excluded from the review.


RESULTS
We identified 160 articles. We included 8 articles in our review that reported on the quality of published economic analyses, 12 articles that reported on guidelines, and 3 articles that reported on checklists/guidelines that are used by journals. There were 2 articles that dealt with the quality of published economic evaluations in obstetrics and gynecology, both of which showed less than optimal quality. There were only 4 articles that provided some general guidelines for the reporting of economic evaluations in obstetrics and gynecology. We found no articles on any checklist/guidelines for the reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics and gynecology.


CONCLUSIONS
There is a need to improve the design, execution, interpretation, and reporting of economic evaluation studies in obstetrics.
Vintzileos
Anthony M
AM
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Beazoglou
Tryfon
T
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis / Q000592:standards; D009774:Obstetrics / Q000191:economics; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000592:standards; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*