Working memory and syllogistic reasoning.
The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between working memory span and syllogistic reasoning performance. In addition, performance for the reasoning task was compared to predictions made by mental model theory and the probability heuristics model. According to mental model theory, syllogisms that require the use of more mental models are more difficult. According to the probability heuristics model difficulty is related to the number of probabilistic heuristics that must be applied, or (for invalid syllogisms) inconsistencies between the derived and correct conclusion. The predictions of these theories were examined across two experiments. In general, people with larger working memory capacities reasoned better. Also, the responses made by people with larger capacities were more likely to correspond to the predictions made by both mental model theory and the probability heuristics model. Relations between working memory span and performance were also consistent with both theories.
Copeland
David
D
Department of Psychology, 118 Haggar Hall, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
Radvansky
Gabriel
G
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011340:Problem Solving; D011930:Reaction Time