title: Diagnostic value of hysterosalpingography in the detection of intrauterine abnormalities: a comparison with hysteroscopy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingography (HSG) in comparison with hysteroscopy in the detection of intrauterine abnormality in infertile patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Seventy-eight patients being investigated for infertility and undergoing HSG and hysteroscopy were studied retrospectively. Radiologic findings on HSG, including single or multiple filling defects and uterine wall irregularities, were evaluated and compared with hysteroscopic findings, which were considered the reference standard.
  
  
  RESULTS
  HSG showed a sensitivity of 81.2% compared with that of hysteroscopy and a specificity of 80.4%, with a positive predictive value of 63.4% and a negative predictive value of 83.7%. HSG also had a false-negative rate of 90% and a false-positive rate of 21.8%. Overall agreement between the two procedures was 73%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  HSG is still a useful screening test for the evaluation of the uterine cavity in the study of primary or secondary infertility. In addition, HSG provides information concerning the assessment of tubal morphology and patency. We believe that these two procedures are complementary in the evaluation of the uterine cavity.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Institut Universitari Dexeus, P Bonanova, 67 pl -2, Barcelona 08017, Spain. dpi@idexeus.es
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roma Dalfó
authors.forename: Belen
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ubeda
authors.forename: Alicia
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ubeda
authors.forename: Montse
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Monzón
authors.forename: Ramón
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Rotger
authors.forename: Rafael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ramos
authors.forename: Angel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Palacio
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004714:Endometrial Hyperplasia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007047:Hysterosalpingography; D015907:Hysteroscopy; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000209:etiology; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D000267:Tissue Adhesions / Q000175:diagnosis; D014591:Uterine Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014594:Uterine Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014599:Uterus / Q000002:abnormalities / Q000473:pathology