title: The bell should toll for the linear no-threshold model.
abstract: The linear no-threshold (LNT) model has been a convenient tool in the practice of radiation protection but it is not supported by scientific data at doses less than about 100 mSv or at chronic dose rates up to at least 200 mSv yr(-1). Radiation protection practices based on the LNT model yield no demonstrable benefits to health when applied at lower annual doses. The assumption that such exposures are harmful may not even be conservative and has helped to foster an unwarranted fear of low-level radiation. For its new recommendations, to be issued probably in 2005, the ICRP has said that it expects to continue the application of the LNT model 'above a few millisieverts per year'. National societies for radiation protection may wish to consider the need to lobby the ICRP, through the auspices of IRPA, to further relax adherence to the LNT assumption-up to 'a few tens of millisieverts per year'.
authors.affiliation: 260 Glenmore Road, Paddington, NSW 2021, Australia. higsond@bigpond.net.au
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Higson
mesh_terms: D001822:Body Burden; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D038622:Internationality; D016014:Linear Models; D008954:Models, Biological; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D011868:Radioisotopes / Q000032:analysis* / Q000592:standards; D011874:Radiometry / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D012062:Relative Biological Effectiveness; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D012307:Risk Factors
chemical_list: D011868:Radioisotopes