title: [Knowledge and problems regarding the topical treatment of leg ulcers: survey among general practitioners in the Indre-et-Loire area].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The quantity of topical treatments for leg ulcers has increased over the last 15 years.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the prescriptions for topical treatments and the problems in the management of leg ulcers using a questionnaire sent to general practitioners.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire in 3 parts was sent to 95 general practitioners in the area working in 36 different districts with an explanatory letter. The first part was composed of 29 closed questions regarding prescription of topical treatment for leg ulcers. The second part, also closed, included 3 pictures showing a budding, a necrotic and a fibrinous ulcer. The physicians had to choose which treatment they would have prescribed and the frequency of dressings changes. The third part was composed of two open questions regarding the problems encountered. The survey started on May 1st and was closed on June 30th 2002. No reminders were sent.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We received 52 replies, 49 of which were exploitable. Forty-five percent (43/95) did not reply. Occlusive dressings were widely prescribed (mainly hydrocolloid 38/49 and hydrocellular 28/49). Vaseline impregnated gauze were less prescribed (14/49). Dressings with balsam of Peru were prescribed often by 10 and occasionally by 27 general practitioners. Alginate or charcoal dressings were not always used appropriately. Antiseptics were prescribed by 10 physicians. Mechanical debridement of fibrinous or necrotic wounds was rarely used even for necrotic ulcers. Topical anesthetics were prescribed in 21 out of 33 cases of mechanical debridement. Some physicians referred care (n=4), others complained about lack of compliance (n=15), cost (n=14), local intolerance (n=10) and the excessively wide variety of dressings (n=10). We drew-up a synopsis with guidelines for treatment, which was sent to all the general practitioners who had participated in the survey.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Forty-three of the 95 physicians approached did not reply. This poor response rate, which is common in this type of survey, may include physicians who are not at ease in the management of ulcers and this may bias the results. The physicians who replied to the survey knew the subject well but complained of the costs and variety of dressings. They were all eager to receive further information and guidelines.
authors.affiliation: Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Trousseau, CHU, 37044 Tours Cedex 01, France.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Tauveron
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Perrinaud
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Fontes
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Lorette
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Machet
mesh_terms: D000287:Administration, Topical; D001458:Bandages; D015982:Bias; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007871:Leg Ulcer / Q000628:therapy*; D010821:Physicians, Family; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*