Comparative investigation of the biocompatibility of various silicon nitride ceramic qualities in vitro.
There is a controversy about the biocompatibility of silicon nitride ceramics contained in the literature, which appears to be related to a factor of the individual chemical composition of different qualities of silicon nitride ceramics and of the different surface properties. This study attempts to investigate the cytotoxicity of different qualities of industrial silicon nitride ceramics applying an L929-cell culture model in a direct contact assay combined with a cell viability assessment. Five different qualities of industrial standard silicon nitride ceramics were chosen for in vitro testing. The chemical composition was determined by EDS analysis. Different biomedically approved aluminium oxide qualities, a titanium alloy, glass and polyvinylchloride (PVC) served as control materials. L929 mice fibroblasts were incubated directly on the materials for 24 h, stained with bisbenzimide and propidium iodine for double fluorochromasia viability testing, and evaluated by inversion-fluorescence microscopy to control cell morphology, viability and cell counts compared to empty well values. Scanning electron microscopy was applied to additionally investigate cell morphology. There was no observation of cytotoxic effects on the silicon nitride ceramic samples; moreover cell morphology remained the same as on aluminium oxide and titanium. Viability testing revealed the presence of avital cells exclusively on PVC, which served as a negative control. Cell counts on all polished surfaces showed significantly higher numbers, whereas some rough surface samples showed significantly lower numbers. We conclude that silicon nitride ceramics show no cytotoxic effects and should be considered for biomedical application owing to its favourable physiochemical properties, especially its superior resistance to mechanical stress, which would be useful for compression loaded conditions. Polished surfaces would appear to promote advanced biocompatibility.
Neumann
A
A
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. andreas.neumann@uni-essen.de
Reske
T
T
Held
M
M
Jahnke
K
K
Ragoss
C
C
Maier
H R
HR
D000537:Aluminum Oxide / Q000737:chemistry; D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000737:chemistry*; D006690:Bisbenzimidazole / Q000737:chemistry; D018929:Cell Culture Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D002460:Cell Line; D049109:Cell Proliferation; D002470:Cell Survival; D002516:Ceramics / Q000737:chemistry*; D005347:Fibroblasts / Q000378:metabolism; D051379:Mice; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D008856:Microscopy, Fluorescence; D011143:Polyvinyl Chloride / Q000737:chemistry; D011419:Propidium / Q000737:chemistry; D017655:Silicon Compounds / Q000737:chemistry*; D013499:Surface Properties; D013997:Time Factors; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D017655:Silicon Compounds; D011419:Propidium; D011143:Polyvinyl Chloride; D014025:Titanium; D006690:Bisbenzimidazole; D000537:Aluminum Oxide; C032734:silicon nitride