title: [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of the present study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of a slow release vaginal PGE2 insert (Propess) with intracervical PGE2 gel (Prepidil gel) in the induction of cervical ripening and labour.
  
  
  METHODS
  For the induction of labour we selected 103 single pregnancies at term presenting a Bishop score of less than 5. Fifty-one were induced with Propess, and 52 with intracervical Prepidil.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 2 groups were homogeneous as regards indications to induction and obstetric characteristics. The success of induction (achievement of uncomplicated vaginal delivery) was comparable in the 2 groups: Propess 67%, Prepidil 65%. The times needed to induce labour were on average longer with Propess (16 h 59 min) than with Prepidil (12 h 54 min), (p<0.05); nevertheless the time needed to achieve delivery by the vaginal route within 24 hours was comparable (49% vs 48%). The number of patients requiring more than one application of prostaglandin was less in the Propess group (5.9%) than in the Prepidil group (55.8%) (p<0.001). The times relative to dilation and expulsion did not differ significantly. Resort to cesarean section for fetal indication (cardiotocographic changes) was greater in inductions with Prepidil (8 cases) compared to Propess (2 cases), p<0.05.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The systems proved equally effective, nevertheless Propess seems to be safer thanks to the lower incidence of cardiotocographic changes such as to indicate urgent cesarean section. Propess would seem to be more acceptable on the part of patients thanks to the smaller number of applications necessary.
authors.affiliation: Dipartimento di Scienze Ginecologiche, Ostetriche e di Neonatologia, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Grignaffini
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Soncini
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Anfuso
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ronzoni
mesh_terms: D000282:Administration, Intravaginal; D020070:Cervical Ripening / Q000187:drug effects*; D015232:Dinoprostone / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D005316:Fetal Distress / Q000139:chemically induced; D005782:Gels; D006801:Humans; D007751:Labor, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D010120:Oxytocics / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D012189:Retrospective Studies
chemical_list: D005782:Gels; D010120:Oxytocics; D015232:Dinoprostone