The use of quantile regression in health care research: a case study examining gender differences in the timeliness of thrombolytic therapy.
Investigators are frequently interested in determining patient and system characteristics associated with delays in the provision of essential medical treatment. Investigators have typically used either multiple linear regression or Cox proportional hazards models to assess the impact of patient and system characteristics on the timeliness of medical treatment. A drawback to the use of these two methods is that they allow, at best, a partial exploration of how a distribution of delays in treatment or of waiting times changes with patient characteristics. In contrast, quantile regression models allow one to assess how any quantile of a conditional distribution changes with patient characteristics. We illustrate the utility of quantile regression by examining gender differences in the delivery of thrombolysis in patients with an acute myocardial infarction. We demonstrate that richer inferences can be drawn through the use of quantile regression. Females were more likely to experience delays in treatment compared to males. Furthermore, gender had a greater impact upon those patients who had the greatest delays in treatment. Investigators who want to determine how a distribution of delays in treatment or of waiting times changes with patient or system characteristics should consider complementing their analyses with the use of quantile regression.
Austin
Peter C
PC
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Canada. peter.austin@ices.on.ca
Tu
Jack V
JV
Daly
Paul A
PA
Alter
David A
DA
D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000188:drug therapy*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012737:Sex Factors; D015912:Thrombolytic Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors
D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents