title: Gender selection: pressure from patients and industry should not alter our adherence to ethical guidelines.
abstract: Patients who undergo assisted reproduction occasionally request that physicians intervene with techniques that help to determine the gender of their offspring. Conventionally, all of these methods require an invasive procedure that places both the mother and pregnancy at risk. However, for sex-linked disorders, the risk/benefit ratio is favorable; therefore, in such cases, gender selection is warranted. The recent introduction of noninvasive techniques for X- and Y-chromosome-bearing sperm sorting now provides another option for couples. However, the method is not absolute in its ability to sort sperm correctly; in many cases, the offspring are not of the desired sex. Sperm sorting has been marketed increasingly as a means for "family balancing," which is contrary to recommendations that are offered by ethics committees of several professional societies. More studies are needed with respect to the impact of gender selection on families before this method is introduced into routine practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. mvs9@columbia.edu
authors.forename: Mark V
authors.initials: MV
authors.lastname: Sauer
mesh_terms: D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010358:Patient Participation; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011247:Pregnancy; D012743:Sex Preselection / Q000941:ethics*; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D014481:United States