Patient dose in multislice CT: why is it increasing and does it matter?
A brief review is presented of the reasons why multislice spiral/helical CT is associated with a higher radiation dose burden to the patient even than incremental CT. These include both intrinsic technological and geometric factors as well as simply a growing use of CT in an increasing number of applications. The typical magnitude of this dose burden is indicated and the basis for the anxiety that underpins it, namely the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis, is discussed, together with the countervailing hypothesis that there is indeed a threshold for radiation harm in man and that the radiation doses associated with CT may lie below this threshold and may even be beneficial (radiation hormesis). There are as yet no certainties in this important area but it is argued that it is not a given that the doses associated with CT are harmful.
Dawson
P
P
UCL Hospitals, Mortimer Street, London W1T 3AA, UK.
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011364:Professional Practice; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods