title: Zygapophysial joint blocks in chronic low back pain: a test of Revel's model as a screening test.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Only controlled blocks are capable of confirming the zygapophysial joints (ZJ) as the pain generator in LBP patients. However, previous workers have found that a cluster of clinical signs ("Revel's criteria"), may be valuable in predicting the results of an initial screening ZJ block. It was suggested that these clinical findings are unsuitable for diagnosis, but may be of value in selecting patients for diagnostic blocks of the lumbar ZJ's. To constitute evidence in favour of a clinical management strategy, these results need confirmation. This study evaluates the utility of 'Revel's criteria' as a screening tool for selection of chronic low back pain patients for controlled ZJ diagnostic blocks.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study utilized a prospective blinded concurrent reference standard related validity design. Consecutive chronic LBP patients completed pain drawings, psychosocial distress and disability questionnaires, received a clinical examination and lumbar zygapophysial blocks. Two reference standards were evaluated simultaneously: 1. 75% reduction of pain on a visual analogue scale (replication of previous work), and 2. abolition of the dominant or primary pain. Using "Revel's criteria" as predictors, logistic regression analyses were used to test the model. Estimates of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios for selected variables were calculated for the two proposed clinical strategies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Earlier results were not replicated. Sensitivity of "Revel's criteria" was low sensitivity (<17%), and specificity high (approximately 90%). Absence of pain with cough or sneeze just reached significance (p = 0.05) within one model.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  "Revel's criteria" are unsuitable as a clinical screening test to select chronic LBP patients for initial ZJ blocks. However, the criteria may have use in identifying a small subset (11%) of patients likely to respond to the initial block (specificity 93%).
authors.affiliation: Department of Health and Society: Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköpings Universitet, SE-581581-85, Sweden. mark.laslett@xtra.co.nz
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Laslett
authors.forename: Birgitta
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Oberg
authors.forename: Charles N
authors.initials: CN
authors.lastname: Aprill
authors.forename: Barry
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: McDonald
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000008:administration & dosage; D002045:Bupivacaine / Q000008:administration & dosage; D002908:Chronic Disease; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007270:Injections, Intra-Articular; D007278:Injections, Spinal; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D012446:Sacroiliac Joint / Q000503:physiopathology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D021801:Zygapophyseal Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*
chemical_list: D000779:Anesthetics, Local; D002045:Bupivacaine