Cost-effective solutions for sewage treatment in developing countries--the case of Brazil.
Cost-effective solutions are a must in developing countries, not only regarding investment costs, but also in respect to technology and operating practices. With these two goals in mind, in Brazil a particular effort has been directed for the development and application of the Chemical Enhanced Primary Treatment (CEPT) process and of the Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) process, both followed by complementary secondary treatment. Both technologies are under current expansion in Brazil. Large CEPT plants have been designed and built, up to 3.7 m3/s average design flow, as well as large UASB reactors, up to 3.0 m3/s average design flow. The applied technologies are cost-effective: they present low investment and efficiencies of BOD removal of up to 50% to 70%. They allow the plant construction in steps, an initial phase with efficiency over the usual primary treatment, and in order to achieve best effluent quality and meet legal water quality standards, a logic upgrade post-treatment can later on be implemented. The higher initial reduction of BOD and TSS also permits savings in construction and operational costs of secondary treatment, due to lower organic load and lower energy consumption. Sludge represents a particular point of attention: in the cases when the CEPT was used, Chemical Stabilisation of the Sludge (CSS) has also been practiced, eliminating the high construction costs of the digesters, all the plant staying chemically operated. In the cases when the UASB is used preceding secondary treatment, sludge can easily return to the anaerobic vessel, the costly sludge digestion unit being avoided. UASB reactors have practically no equipment in the anaerobic vessel, no energy consumption, low sludge production, and when applied in hot climates as in Brazil, heating devices are not required. The Brazilian experience, some particular cases, special comments on design and different secondary treatment processes are presented in this paper, as a contribution to the discussion of cost and benefits, a prime point to be considered.
Jordão
E P
EP
Depto de Recursos Hídricos e Meio Ambiente da Escola Politécnica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CP 68570 - CEP 21945-970 Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. jordao@civil.ee.ufrj.br
Volschan
I
I
D001421:Bacteria, Anaerobic; D019149:Bioreactors; D001938:Brazil; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003906:Developing Countries; D012722:Sewage; D013997:Time Factors; D014865:Waste Disposal, Fluid / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D018508:Water Purification / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*
D012722:Sewage