title: The rights of blood recipients should supersede any asserted rights of blood donors.
abstract: Some gay men have argued that the laboratory testing of blood is so accurate that continued deferrals based upon sexual activity are unnecessary and unjust. They also assert that they have a right to donate blood. There has been much debate over altering the rule barring donation from men who have had sex with other men since 1977, with blood organizations disagreeing over the best course of action. Two studies have indicated that changing the rule would increase the risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. This dilemma is part of a broader issue, namely: what are the responsibilities of blood services to blood donors and recipients? Blood services should base decisions regarding donor suitability on science rather than on their donors' desires. Blood services must recognize that the rights of blood recipients should supersede any asserted rights of blood donors.
authors.affiliation: University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. jay-brooks@ouhsc.edu
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Brooks
mesh_terms: D001782:Blood Donors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D001803:Blood Transfusion / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000635:transmission; D018451:Homosexuality, Male; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D028701:Patient Rights; D011287:Prejudice; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014342:Truth Disclosure