title: [Non operative treatment for perforated peptic ulcer: results of a prospective study].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The conservative management of perforated peptic ulcer has not gained widespread acceptance despite introduction of proton-pomp inhibitors because surgical procedures can achieve immediate closure by eventually using a laparoscopic approach. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the results of Taylor's method and to identify predictive factors of failure of medical treatment in patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between 1990 and 2000, 82 consecutive patients, with diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer were prospectively included in this study. They were initially treated with non-operative procedure (nasogastric suction and intravenous administration of H2-blockers or proton-pomp inhibitors). No clinical improvement after 24 hours required a surgical treatment. Predictive factors of failure of non-operative treatment were tested in univariate or multivariate analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Clinical improvement was obtained with non-operative treatment in 54% of the patients (44/82). The overall mortality rate was 1%. In univariate analysis, significant predictive factors of failure of non-operative treatment were: size of pneumoperitoneum, heart beat >94 bpm, abdominal meteorism, pain at digital rectal exam, and age >59 years. In multivariate analysis, the significant factors were the size of pneumoperitoneum, heart beat, and abdominal meteorism. The association of these criteria: size of pneumoperitoneum >size of the first lumbar vertebra, heart beat >94 bpm, pain at digital rectal exam and age > 59 years , led to surgical treatment in all cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results suggest that more than 50% of patients with perforated peptic ulcer respond to conservative treatment without surgery and that the association of few criteria (size of pneumoperitoneum, heart beat, pain at digital rectal exam and age) require emergency surgery.
authors.affiliation: Service de chirurgie générale et digestive, CHU de Rouen, 1, rue de Germont, 76031 Rouen, France.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Songne
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Jean
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Foulatier
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Khalil
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Scotté
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004791:Enzyme Inhibitors / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate; D006635:Histamine H2 Antagonists / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D010146:Pain; D010439:Peptic Ulcer Perforation / Q000188:drug therapy*; D010808:Physical Examination; D011027:Pneumoperitoneum; D011446:Prospective Studies; D054328:Proton Pump Inhibitors; D013276:Stomach Ulcer / Q000188:drug therapy*; D013396:Suction; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D004791:Enzyme Inhibitors; D006635:Histamine H2 Antagonists; D054328:Proton Pump Inhibitors