title: The postoperative analgesic efficacy of wound instillation with ropivacaine 0.1% versus ropivacaine 0.2%.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the influence of ropivacaine concentration on wound instillation-induced postoperative analgesia following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Large referral hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  40 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  A standard general anesthetic was administered. In all cases surgery was performed via a Pfannenstiel incision. On completion of the surgery, a multi-orifice, 20-gauge epidural catheter was placed above the fascia such that the tip was sited at the point that demarcated 50% of the length of the surgical wound. Thereafter, the catheter was connected to an electronic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device programmed to deliver 9 mL of drug, with a lockout time of 60 minutes and no basal infusion. Patients were randomized to receive PCA with ropivacaine 0.1% (Group 0.1) or ropivacaine 0.2% (Group 0.2). During the first 6 postoperative hours, a co-investigator administered "rescue" morphine (2 mg IV). Thereafter, "rescue" meperidine 1 mg/kg was administered on patient request.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The number of attempts to activate the PCA device and actual PCA instillations during the 24 hour study period were similar between the groups. The number of 2 mg "rescue" morphine dosages administered was 4.3 +/- 1.7 versus 4.4 +/- 2.5 for the Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, respectively. For Group 0.1 and Group 0.2, the total dose of "rescue" morphine administered during the first 6 postoperative hours was 8.7 mg +/- 3.6 versus 9.1 mg +/- 5, respectively. "Rescue" meperidine administration during the subsequent 18 hours was similar between the groups. Throughout the study period, pain scores were similar between the groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With a pre-set volume, varying the concentration of ropivacaine (0.1% versus 0.2%) does not affect the analgesic efficacy of wound instillation following total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Saba, Israel.
authors.forename: Edna
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Zohar
authors.forename: Arie
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shapiro
authors.forename: Alex
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Phillipov
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hoppenstein
authors.forename: Zvi
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Klein
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Fredman
mesh_terms: D000577:Amides / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D016058:Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D007322:Instillation, Drug; D008875:Middle Aged; D009020:Morphine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D010052:Ovariectomy; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000187:drug effects; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000188:drug therapy*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D000077212:Ropivacaine
chemical_list: D000577:Amides; D000701:Analgesics, Opioid; D000779:Anesthetics, Local; D009020:Morphine; D000077212:Ropivacaine