title: What do other local providers think of NHS walk-in centres? Results of a postal survey.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To ascertain the views of other providers of primary and emergency healthcare services about their local walk-in centre.
  
  
  METHODS
  Postal survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  National Health Service healthcare providers (general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, pharmacists, Accident and Emergency (A and E) consultants) working in close proximity to 20 English walk-in centres.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall response rate to the survey was 79% (n = 1591). Nearly one-third of respondents felt that patient expectations had increased since their local walk-in centre opened, although this varied across the different sites. Some providers had noticed a reduction in their workload, but 15% claimed that workloads had increased since their local walk-in centre opened. There was broad agreement that these new centres did address issues of access and that they provided appropriate care of a reasonable quality. Communication between walk-in centres and other local healthcare providers was an area of considerable concern; GPs, in particular, were anxious about the impact of the service on continuity of care. There were clear differences of opinion between different types of health professional, with doctors tending to be more critical and practice nurses being more supportive.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  It has been suggested that healthcare professionals, notably GPs, are universally opposed to the concept of walk-in centres. This survey shows that opinions were divided, but overall, more local providers were in favour of this new service than were opposed to it. There was more support for centres co-located with A and E departments than "shop-front"-type facilities, but there were concerns that the service offered was too limited. The success or otherwise of the walk-in centre initiative will depend, in part, on building good relationships between the centres and other local providers. Understanding the views of local providers is important for those developing walk-in centres, and for those engaged in planning services in the wider health economies where these services are placed.
authors.affiliation: School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. cjp@soton.ac.uk
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Pope
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Chalder
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Salisbury
mesh_terms: D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000600:supply & distribution; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D004632:Emergency Medical Services / Q000458:organization & administration; D004739:England; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016526:Workload