Human parvovirus B19 serology with recombinant VP1 and VP2 antigens: diagnosis of acute infections by detecting B19-specific IgM and IgA antibodies.
BACKGROUND
The availability of immunoassays for the laboratory diagnosis of human parvovirus B19 (B19) infection, which is commonly associated with erythema infectiosum in children and arthropathy and arthralgia in adults has been hampered by the lack of native B19 antigen. The production of abundant supplies of recombinant (r) B19 proteins, through the cloning of the B19 genome into expression vectors, has led to a proliferation of assays for detecting B19-specific antibodies.


OBJECTIVE
This study was undertaken to evaluate serological assays for detecting B19-specific IgM and IgA antibodies using rVP1 and rVP2 B19 viral coat proteins. Their suitability in the diagnosis of acute B19 infections and the incidence of non-specific reactivity were determined.


METHODS
A panel of sera consisting of B19-specific IgM-positive and -negative samples was tested for B19-specific IgM and IgA antibodies in an indirect IFA using rVP1 antigen. These samples and a further panel collected from patients with other virus infections and samples containing rheumatoid factor were tested for B19-specific IgM in an antibody-capture ELISA and an indirect ELISA, both of which utilized rVP2 antigen.


RESULTS
Data from the two ELISAs using rVP2 antigen and the IFA with rVP1 antigen all showed significant correlation (P >/= 0.001) with a reference RIA using native B19 antigen. Non-specific reactions were observed with Paul-Bunnell-positive and rubella virus-specific IgM antibody-positive sera in the ELISAs but not in the IFA. B19-specific IgA antibodies were detected in all sera containing B19-specific IgM antibodies but were also found in a small number of sera collected from healthy blood donors with no history of recent B19 infection.


CONCLUSIONS
This study demonstrates the usefulness of assays employing rVP1 and rVP2 B19 antigens for detecting B19-specific antibodies. The use of IgM-specific ELISAs allows the processing of large numbers of samples and the absence of non-specific reactivity in the IFA may indicate a role for this assay as a confirmatory test.
Gray
J J
JJ
Clinical Microbiology and Public Health Laboratory, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 2QW, UK.
Roth
C
C
Swygart
C
C
Desselberger
U
U