title: Induced abortion and concurrent adoption of contraception in the rural areas of India (an ICMR task force study).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite a liberal Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) act and awareness of family planning, maternal mortality attributable to induced abortion is high.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Assess attitude, behavior, practices and utilization of services by rural women for induced abortion and concurrent acceptance of contraception.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross sectional survey of eligible married women in 13 states in India over one year.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 1851 women who had an induced abortion during the previous 3 years were interviewed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Includes proportions, rates and chi-square test.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The main reason for seeking abortion was "don't need any more children" (42%), and in 12.4 per cent they specifically mentioned that they "don't need any more daughters". Around 46% of women accessed abortion services from private clinics as compared to government hospital (37.1%) and Primary Health Centre/Community Health Centre (14.0%). The decision to terminate the pregnancy and place of abortion was made by the husband in 42.8% and 52.5% respectively. Regret for abortion was expressed by 29.6% of the women. However, only 7.2% said they would not advice others for induced abortion. Nearly one half of the women undergoing abortion accepted a family planning method concurrently; of these Intra Uterine Device/oral contraceptives and a permanent method was adopted by 37.2% and 49.1% respectively. Acceptance of vasectomy by male partner was found to be low (1.3%). "Husband objected" (32.3%) was the main reason for not accepting post abortal contraception. Majority of the acceptors said they would recommend to others the same place where they had undergone abortion, thus indicating their satisfaction with the source and services received.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Counselling for post-abortal contraceptive should be provided to the couple so that they can make an informed choice.
authors.affiliation: Division of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110 029, India.
authors.forename: B S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Dhillon
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Chandhiok
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kambo
authors.forename: N C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Saxena
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003267:Contraception / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D003906:Developing Countries; D005193:Family Planning Services / Q000458:organization & administration; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D011247:Pregnancy; D011275:Pregnancy, Unwanted; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012424:Rural Population; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires