Surface hardness properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and polyacid-modified composite resins.
In this study the top and bottom surface hardness of two polyacid-modified composite resins (PMCRs), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and one composite resin were evaluated. The affect of water storage on their hardness was also investigated. The study was conducted using four different groups, each having five specimens obtained from fiberglass die molds with a diameter of 5 mm and a height of 2 mm. Measurements were made on the top and bottom surface of each specimen and recorded after 24 hours and again at 60 days. All tested materials showed different hardness values, and the values of top surfaces of the specimens were found to be higher than the bottom surface in all test groups. There was no statistical difference in the Vickers hardness (HV) values when the test specimens were kept in water storage. In conclusion Hytac displayed microhardness values higher than Vitremer and Dyract. We found the order of HV values to be Surfil > Hytac > Dyract > Vitremer, respectively. Vitremer presented the lowest microhardness level and Surfil the highest.
Bayindir
Yusuf Ziya
YZ
Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Atatürk in Erzurum, Turkey. ybayy@atauni.edu.tr
Yildiz
Mehmet
M
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D020770:Compomers / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000737:chemistry / Q000528:radiation effects; D006244:Hardness; D008027:Light; D008422:Materials Testing; D044367:Phase Transition; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013499:Surface Properties
D020770:Compomers; D003188:Composite Resins; C088486:Dyract; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; C403464:SureFil packable composite; C084550:Vitremer; C105429:hytac