Validity of test score interpretations for three self-concept measures based on differing theoretical models.
Three theoretical models have been proposed to represent self-concept: (a) unidimensional; (b) multidimensional; (c) multidimensional hierarchical. Inventories have been developed under each of the three competing theoretical models; which model best represents self-concept is unclear. Typically, self-concept construct validation has utilized various approaches including correlational, multitrait-multimethod, and factor analytic methods. Another method, however, for assessing validity would be to determine the consequences of score interpretations using different measures specific to each of the theoretical models. This paper examined Messick's notion (1989) of the validity of test-score interpretations as applied to three of the most widely used measures derived under each of the three different theoretical models of self-concept. Results suggest that overall multidimensional measures are more consistent in classifying individual's self-concept than unidimensional measures.
Fletcher
Richard B
RB
School of Psychology, Massey University Albany, North Shore Mail Centre, Aotearoa, New Zealand. R.B.Fletcher@massey.ac.nz
Marshall
Dru
D
Nielsen
Brian
B
Hattie
John A
JA
D000293:Adolescent; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012649:Self Concept; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires