In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty.
In designing a posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) it is preferable that when the cam engages the tibial spine the contact point of the cam move down the tibial spine. This provides greater stability in flexion by creating a greater jump distance and reduces the stress on the tibial spine. In order to eliminate edge loading of the femoral component on the posterior tibial articular surface, the posterior femoral condyles need to be extended. This provides an ideal femoral contact with the tibial articular surface during high flexion angles. To reduce extensor mechanism impingement in deep flexion, the anterior margin of the tibial articular component should be recessed. This provides clearance for the patella and patella tendon. An in vivo kinematic analysis that determined three dimensional motions of the femorotibial joint was performed during a deep knee bend using fluoroscopy for 20 subjects having a TKA designed for deep flexion. The average weight-bearing range-of-motion was 125 degrees . On average, TKA subjects experienced 4.9 degrees of normal axial rotation and all subjects experienced at least -4.4 mm of posterior femoral rollback. It is assumed that femorotibial kinematics can play a major role in patellofemoral kinematics. In this study, subjects implanted with a high-flexion TKA design experienced kinematic patterns that were similar to the normal knee. It can be hypothesized that forces acting on the patella were not substantially increased for TKA subjects compared with the normal subjects.
Argenson
Jean-Noël A
JN
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Aix-Marseille University, Hopital Sainte-Marguerite, 270 Boulevard Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France. jean-noel.argenson@ap-hm.fr
Scuderi
Giles R
GR
Komistek
Richard D
RD
Scott
W Norman
WN
Kelly
Michael A
MA
Aubaniac
Jean-Manuel
JM
D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000379:methods; D017076:Computer-Aided Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D009068:Movement; D011474:Prosthesis Design / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D016896:Treatment Outcome