title: Does capitated contracting improve efficiency? Evidence from California hospitals.
abstract: This study examines the effect of capitated contracting on hospital efficiency to better understand strategies related to the recent financial crisis in the California health care market. Our findings indicate that less efficient hospitals are more likely to participate in capitated contracting. As a result, hospitals with capitated contracts are, on average, less efficient than hospitals without capitated contracts. Hospital efficiency generally increases with respect to the degree of capitation involvement. The efficiency improvement, however, becomes insignificant when capitation exposures are already high. Thus, hospital executives should not be overly optimistic about efficiency gains obtained in capitated contracting and should control the degree of capitation involvement.
authors.affiliation: Department of Accounting, College of Commerce, National Taipei University, Taiwan, ROC.
authors.forename: Hsuan-Lien
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: Chu
authors.forename: Shuen-Zen
authors.initials: SZ
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: James C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Romeis
mesh_terms: D002140:California; D002204:Capitation Fee; D003284:Contract Services / Q000191:economics*; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005377:Financial Management, Hospital / Q000379:methods*; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006761:Hospitals / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008484:Medicaid / Q000191:economics; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics; D017059:Models, Econometric; D014600:Utilization Review