title: Concepts, rationale, and current outcomes of less invasive surgical strategies for early gastric cancer: data from a quarter-century of experience in a single institution.
abstract: Previously proposed criteria of less invasive surgery for early gastric cancer (EGC) were based mainly on the pathological analyses of the resected specimens; however, preoperative and intraoperative information are also obviously essential for decision making on stage-dependent patient management. Furthermore, most indications and treatment options have not been systematically integrated or evaluated by treatment outcomes. We investigate in this report the rationality of less invasive surgery employed for EGC. Distribution analyses of positive nodes were investigated among 684 patients with primary solitary EGC (379 mucosal and 305 submucosal) who underwent curative resection between 1976 and 2000. Clinicopathological factors highlighted and analyzed included clinical (preoperative and intraoperative) and pathological (postoperative) cancer depth and nodal involvement, gross form, histological type, and maximum cancer diameter, as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality. The scope of lymphadenectomy can be reduced to a modified D1 for clinically mucosal, node-negative, nonpalpable gastric cancer, or for clinically submucosal, node-negative gastric cancer < or = 1.5 cm for intestinal type, or < or = 1.0 cm for diffuse type. Otherwise, a modified D2 lymphadenectomy is sufficient. Local resection can be recommended for clinically mucosal, node-negative gastric cancer without apparent ulceration < or = 4 cm if adjacent lymph nodes are proved cancer negative by a frozen section examination. If the gastric cancer has spread beyond the above criteria, a pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) can be recommended for tumors located in the middle or lower third of the stomach, provided the distal margin of the cancer is at least 4.5 cm from the pyloric ring. The PPG can be accompanied by a modified D1 or a modified D2 lymphadenectomy according to the respective dissection criteria. Results of these less invasive strategies showed reduced morbidity and mortality, as well as no recurrence or cancer-related deaths. These results suggest that each of our criteria for less invasive surgery for EGC is realistic, well stratified, and satisfactory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Tokyo, 3-7-1, Hongo, Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8655, Japan. shimoyama-dis@h.u-tokyo.ac.jp
authors.forename: Shouji
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Shimoyama
authors.forename: Yasuyuki
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Seto
authors.forename: Hidemitsu
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Yasuda
authors.forename: Ken-ichi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Mafune
authors.forename: Michio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kaminishi
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D005743:Gastrectomy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000379:methods; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013274:Stomach Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome