Light signaling in scotopic conditions in the rabbit, mouse and rat retina: a physiological and anatomical study.
In the dark, light signals are conventionally routed through the following circuit: rods synapse onto rod bipolar (RB) cells, which in turn contact AII amacrine cells. AII cells segregate the light signal into the on and off pathways by making electrical synapses with on cone bipolar (CB) cells and glycinergic inhibitory chemical synapses with off CB cells. These bipolar cells synapse onto their respective ganglion cells, which transfer on and off signals to the visual centers of the brain. Two alternative pathways have recently been postulated for the signal transfer in scotopic conditions: 1) electrical coupling between rods and cones, and 2) a circuit independent of cone photoreceptors, implying direct contacts between rods and off CB cells. Anatomical evidence supports the existence of both these circuits. To investigate the contribution of these alternative pathways to scotopic vision in the mammalian retina, we have performed patch-clamp recordings from ganglion cells in the dark-adapted retina of the rabbit, mouse, and rat. Approximately one-half of the ganglion cells in the rabbit retina received off signals through a circuit that was independent of RB cells. This was shown by their persistence in the presence of the glutamate agonist 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (APB), which blocks rod-->RB cell signaling. Consistent with this result, strychnine, a glycine receptor antagonist, was unable to abolish these off responses. In addition, we were able to show that some off cone bipolar dendrites terminate at rod spherules and make potential contacts. In the mouse retina, however, there seems to be a very low proportion of off signals carried by an APB-resistant pathway. No ganglion cells in the rat retina displayed APB- and strychnine-resistant responses. Our data support signaling through flat contacts between rods and off CB cells as the alternative route, but suggest that the significance of this pathway differs between species.
Protti
Dario A
DA
Discipline of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences and Inst. for Biomedical Research F13 The Univ. of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. dariop@physiol.usyd.edu.au
Flores-Herr
Nicolas
N
Li
Wei
W
Massey
Stephen C
SC
Wässle
Heinz
H
D000613:Aminobutyrates / Q000494:pharmacology; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D018690:Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists / Q000494:pharmacology; D018684:Glycine Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D007150:Immunohistochemistry / Q000379:methods; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008027:Light; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000187:drug effects / Q000528:radiation effects; D051379:Mice; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009474:Neurons / Q000145:classification / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects*; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques / Q000379:methods; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D051381:Rats; D012160:Retina / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects*; D013045:Species Specificity; D013331:Strychnine / Q000494:pharmacology; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects
D000613:Aminobutyrates; D018690:Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; D018684:Glycine Agents; C012729:2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid; D013331:Strychnine