Clinical evaluation of postpartum vaginal mucus reflects uterine bacterial infection and the immune response in cattle.
Bacteria contaminate the uterus of most dairy cattle after parturition and endometritis causes infertility. An endometritis score can be ascribed based on the vaginal mucus character and odour but it is not clear if the clinical score reflects the number of uterine bacteria or the inflammatory response. The present study tested the hypothesis that clinical evaluation of endometritis reflects the number of bacteria present in the uterus, and the acute phase protein response. Swabs (n = 328) were collected from the uterine lumen of dairy cattle, 21 and 28 days postpartum, vaginal mucus was scored for character and odour, and blood samples collected for acute phase protein measurement. Bacteria were identified following aerobic and anaerobic culture, and the bacterial growth density was scored semi-quantitatively. When bacteria were categorised by their expected pathogenic potential in the uterus, purulent or fetid odour vaginal mucus was associated with the growth density of pathogenic bacteria but not opportunist contaminants. When bacteria were analysed independently, Arcanobacterium pyogenes, Proteus and Fusobacterium necrophorum growth densities were associated with mucopurulent or purulent vaginal mucus. The bacterial growth densities for A. pyogenes, Escherichia coli, non-hemolytic Streptococci, and Mannheimia haemolytica were associated with a fetid mucus odour. Peripheral plasma concentrations of alpha(1)-acid glycoprotein were higher if there was a fetid compared with a normal vaginal mucus odour (1.50 +/- 0.09 mg/mL versus 1.05 +/- 0.02 mg/mL, P < 0.001), but did not differ significantly between vaginal mucus character scores. The evaluation of the character and odour of vaginal mucus reflects the number of bacteria in the uterus, and the acute phase protein response.
Williams
Erin J
EJ
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK.
Fischer
Deborah P
DP
Pfeiffer
Dirk U
DU
England
Gary C W
GC
Noakes
David E
DE
Dobson
Hilary
H
Sheldon
I Martin
IM
D000191:Actinomycetaceae / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D000818:Animals; D001419:Bacteria / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000276:immunology / Q000662:veterinary*; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000276:immunology / Q000382:microbiology*; D005260:Female; D005673:Fusobacterium / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D009093:Mucus / Q000382:microbiology*; D009812:Odorants; D011511:Proteus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D011645:Puerperal Infection / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000382:microbiology / Q000662:veterinary*; D013210:Staphylococcus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D013291:Streptococcus / Q000254:growth & development / Q000302:isolation & purification; D014591:Uterine Diseases / Q000276:immunology / Q000382:microbiology / Q000662:veterinary*; D014621:Vagina / Q000382:microbiology*