title: Results of a randomized controlled trial of intervention to implement smoking guidelines in Veterans Affairs medical centers: increased use of medications without cessation benefit.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The AHRQ Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence recommends screening and treatment of all tobacco users. Effective methods to implement recommendations are needed because simple guideline dissemination does not necessarily result in changes in practice.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The Guideline Implementation for Tobacco (GIFT) study tested an organizational intervention to improve Guideline implementation.
  
  
  METHODS
  GIFT randomized 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers to intervention or control conditions. We trained prime movers at each site to improve identification of smoking status, promote primary care interventions and increase availability of smoking cessation medications. Sites and patients were evaluated before and after intervention.
  
  
  METHODS
  GIFT included 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers and 5678 subjects.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data regarding smoking status, delivery of treatment, medication use, and smoking cessation were collected from participant surveys, medical record review, survey of site leaders, and Pharmacy Benefits Management.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The intervention did not increase participant report of being asked about smoking status or receipt of counseling. It did increase the rate of identification of smoking status in the medical record (P = 0.0001) but did not increase the rate of counseling to stop smoking. Site level data showed no increase in the number of patients receiving smoking cessation medications or dollars spent on medications. Individual smoker data showed a significant increase in the use of medications for smoking cessation in intervention sites (odds ratio = 6.89, P < 0.0001); however, only a small minority of smokers received medication even after the intervention. There was no difference in smoking cessation rates between participants at the intervention and treatment sites.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We conclude that improvements in smoking cessation rates are likely to require more intensive intervention in this population.
authors.affiliation: VA Medical Center, Section of General Intemal Medicine, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA. Anne.M.Joseph@med.va.gov
authors.forename: Anne M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Joseph
authors.forename: Nancy J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Arikian
authors.forename: Larry C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: An
authors.forename: Sean M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Nugent
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Sloan
authors.forename: Carl F
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Pieper
mesh_terms: D015331:Cohort Studies; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006302:Health Services Research; D006787:Hospitals, Veterans / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards; D016540:Smoking Cessation / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D014481:United States