title: A critical assessment of the European Commission's proposals for the risk assessment and registration of chemical substances in the European Union.
abstract: In May, 2003, the European Commission published detailed proposals relating to its 2001 White Paper - Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. The White Paper described a new registration system called the REACH (Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) system, for both new and existing chemicals. Subsequently, these detailed proposals were available for an eight-week consultation period for stakeholders to voice their views and concerns. In this paper, we describe our reactions to the Commission's more-detailed proposals. These include the creation of a European Chemicals Agency to implement the REACH system in conjunction with Competent Authorities (CAs) in Member States and the Commission itself. Unfortunately, many of our concerns and suggestions, previously voiced and shared with several other key stakeholders, remain unanswered, but are as relevant as when the White Paper was published. In particular, we are concerned about the lack of a clear and coherent strategy. There is no guidance for registrants on intelligent testing to maximise the use of non-animal approaches to safety testing, based on a combination of factors for estimating exposure levels, rather than mainly on production volumes. We are also concerned about the absence of a clear programme for the development, improvement and validation of new alternative methods, in conjunction with the Commission's own unit, the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods, as well as other organisations with relevant expertise and experience, including FRAME. Finally, we explain why such measures should be introduced, together with clearer guidelines for the respective roles of the Agency, the CAs and the Commission in implementing and harmonising the REACH system at the European Union and Member State levels. A series of recommendations are made, to improve the situation and to improve the risk assessment process.
authors.affiliation: FRAME, Russell & Burch House, 96-98 North Sherwood Street, Nottingham NG1 4EE, UK.
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Combes
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dandrea
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Balls
mesh_terms: D023401:Animal Use Alternatives / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods*; D002621:Chemistry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005062:European Union; D017408:Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards; D011640:Public Policy; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods*