Randomised controlled cross-over comparison of continuous positive airway pressure through the Hamilton Galileo ventilator with a Dräger CF 800 device.
In this controlled, randomised cross-over trial on 26 intensive care patients, we compared the effects on haemodynamic and respiratory profiles of continuous positive airway pressure delivered through the Hamilton Galileo ventilator or a Drager CF 800 device. We also compared the nursing time saved using the two approaches when weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. We did not find significant differences in haemodynamics, respiratory rate, physiological dead space, oxygen saturation and carbon dioxide production between the continuous positive airway pressure generated by the Galileo and Drager machines. However, there was a 10-fold reduction in nursing time using the Galileo ventilator compared with the Drager generator. We conclude that continuous positive airway pressure delivered through the Galileo ventilator is as efficient as a Drager device but consumes less nursing time.
Sutton
P J
PJ
Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham Heartlands and Solihull NHS Trust (Teaching), Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5SS, England.
Perkins
C L
CL
Giles
S P
SP
McAuley
D F
DF
Gao
F
F
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001794:Blood Pressure; D045422:Continuous Positive Airway Pressure / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000451:nursing; D003422:Critical Care; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012143:Respiratory Physiological Phenomena; D015300:Ventilator Weaning / Q000191:economics / Q000451:nursing; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical