title: Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has introduced an integrated electronic medical record, performance measurement, and other system changes directed at improving care. Recent comparisons with other delivery systems have been limited to a small set of indicators.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the quality of VHA care with that of care in a national sample by using a comprehensive quality-of-care measure.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional comparison.
  
  
  METHODS
  12 VHA health care systems and 12 communities.
  
  
  METHODS
  596 VHA patients and 992 patients identified through random-digit dialing. All were men older than 35 years of age.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between 1997 and 2000, quality was measured by using a chart-based quality instrument consisting of 348 indicators targeting 26 conditions. Results were adjusted for clustering, age, number of visits, and medical conditions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients from the VHA scored significantly higher for adjusted overall quality (67% vs. 51%; difference, 16 percentage points [95% CI, 14 to 18 percentage points]), chronic disease care (72% vs. 59%; difference, 13 percentage points [CI, 10 to 17 percentage points]), and preventive care (64% vs. 44%; difference, 20 percentage points [CI, 12 to 28 percentage points]), but not for acute care. The VHA advantage was most prominent in processes targeted by VHA performance measurement (66% vs. 43%; difference, 23 percentage points [CI, 21 to 26 percentage points]) and least prominent in areas unrelated to VHA performance measurement (55% vs. 50%; difference, 5 percentage points [CI, 0 to 10 percentage points]).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Unmeasured residual differences in patient characteristics, a lower response rate in the national sample, and differences in documentation practices could have contributed to some of the observed differences.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Patients from the VHA received higher-quality care according to a broad measure. Differences were greatest in areas where the VHA has established performance measures and actively monitors performance.
authors.affiliation: Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA. Steven.Asch@med.va.gov
authors.forename: Steven M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Asch
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: McGlynn
authors.forename: Mary M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Hogan
authors.forename: Rodney A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Hayward
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Shekelle
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rubenstein
authors.forename: Joan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Keesey
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Adams
authors.forename: Eve A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Kerr
mesh_terms: D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006787:Hospitals, Veterans / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D014481:United States; D014493:United States Department of Veterans Affairs / Q000592:standards*