Laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an evaluation of the mesorectum's macroscopic quality.
BACKGROUND
Next to surgical margins, yield of lymph nodes, and length of bowel resected, macroscopic completeness of mesorectal excision may serve as another quality control of total mesorectal excision (TME). In this study, the macroscopic completeness of laparoscopic TME was evaluated.


METHODS
A series of 25 patients with rectal cancer were managed laparoscopically (LTME) and included in this study. The pathologic specimens of the LTME group were prospectively examined and matched with a historical group of resection specimens from patients who had undergone open TME (OTME). The two groups were matched for gender and type of resection (low anterior or abdominoperineal resection). Special care was given to the macroscopic judgment concerning the completeness of the mesorectum.


RESULTS
A three-grade scoring system showed no differences between the LTME and OTME groups.


CONCLUSIONS
The current study supports the hypothesis that oncologic resection using laparoscopic TME is feasible and adequate.
Breukink
S O
SO
Department of Surgery, Groningen University Hospital, Postbus 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. S.Breukink@planet.nl
Grond
A J K
AJ
Pierie
J P E N
JP
Hoff
C
C
Wiggers
T
T
Meijerink
W J H J
WJ
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*