title: Assumptions, ambiguities, and possibilities in interdisciplinary population health research.
abstract: The rhetoric of "interdisciplinary," "multi-disciplinary," and "transdisciplinary" permeates many population health research projects, funding proposals, and strategic initiatives. Working across, with, and between disciplines is touted as a way to advance knowledge, answer more complex questions, and work more meaningfully with users of research. From our own experiences and involvement in the 2003 CIHR Institute for Public and Population Health's Summer Institute, interdisciplinary population health research (IPHR) remains ambiguously defined and poorly understood. In this commentary, we critically explore some characteristics and ongoing assumptions associated with IPHR and propose questions to ensure a more deliberate research process. It is our hope that population health researchers and the CIHR will consider these questions to help strengthen IPHR.
authors.affiliation: School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON. kwhitfie@fes.uwaterloo.ca
authors.forename: Kyle
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Whitfield
authors.forename: Colleen
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Reid
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health; D012107:Research Design