title: A cross-culturally standardized set of pictures for younger and older adults: American and Chinese norms for name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity.
abstract: The present study presents normative measures for 260 line drawings of everyday objects, found in Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980), viewed by individuals in China and the United States. Within each cultural group, name agreement, concept agreement, and familiarity measures were obtained separately for younger adults and older adults. For a subset of 57 pictures (22%), there was equivalence in both name agreement and concept agreement, and for an additional subset of 29 pictures (11%), there was nonequivalent name agreement but equivalent concept agreement, across all culture-by-age groups. The data indicate substantial differences across culture-by-age groups in name agreement percentages and number of distinct name responses provided. We discovered significant differences between older and younger American adults in both name agreement percentages (67 pictures, or 26%) and concept agreement percentages (44 pictures, or 17%). Written naming responses collected for the entire set of Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures showed shifts in both naming and concept agreement percentages over the intervening decades: Although correlations in name agreement were strong (r = .71, p < .001) between our younger American samples and those of Snodgrass and Vanderwart, name agreement percentages have changed for a substantial proportion (33%) of the 260 pictures; moreover, 63% of the stimuli for which Snodgrass and Vanderwart reported concept agreement now appear to differ. We provide comprehensive comparison statistics and tests for both the present study and prior ones, finding differences across numerous item-level measures. The corpus of data suggests that substantial differences in all measures can be found across age as well as culture, so that unequivocal conclusions with respect to cross-cultural or age-related differences in cognition can be made only when appropriate stimuli are selected for studies. Data for all 260 pictures, for each of the four groups, and all supporting materials and tests are freely archived at http://agingmind.cns.uiuc.edu/Pict_Norms. The full set of these norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.
authors.affiliation: University of Michigan, Business School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, USA. yoonc@umich.edu
authors.forename: Carolyn
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Yoon
authors.forename: Fred
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Feinberg
authors.forename: Ting
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Luo
authors.forename: Trey
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hedden
authors.forename: Angela Hall
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Gutchess
authors.forename: Hiu-Ying Mary
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Joseph A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Mikels
authors.forename: Shulan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jiao
authors.forename: Denise C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Park
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D002681:China; D003071:Cognition; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014481:United States; D014796:Visual Perception