From the "charretera" to the supraclavicular fascial island flap: revisitation and further evolution of a controversial flap.
Wide tissue defects located on the face and neck area often require distant flaps or free flaps to achieve a tension-free reconstruction together with an acceptable aesthetic result. The supraclavicular island flap surely represents a versatile and useful flap that can be used in case of large tissue losses. Because of its wide arc of rotation, which ensures a 180-degree mobilization anteriorly and posteriorly, the flap can reach distant sites when harvested as a pure island flap. The main vascular supply of the flap, the supraclavicular artery, a branch of the transverse cervical artery or, less frequently, of the suprascapular artery, though reliable, is not a very large vessel. In some particular cases, when too much tension or angles that are too tight are present, the vascular supply of the flap can be difficult and special care must be taken to avoid flap failure. To avoid this problem, the authors started harvesting the flap not as a pure island flap but with a fascial pedicle, thin and resistant, which ensures good reliability; also, when a higher tension rate is present, it avoids the risk of excessive traction or kinking of the vessels. Twenty-five consecutive patients with various defects located on the head, neck, and thorax area were treated in the past 2 years using the modified supraclavicular island flap. There was no flap loss or distant necrosis of the flap, and there was marginal skin deepithelialization in only two cases, which only required minor surgery. Postoperative morbidity was low, similar to the classic supraclavicular island flap, with primarily closed donor sites, except for one case, and tension-free scars. The authors show how the modified supraclavicular island flap is a reliable and safe flap that gives a good aesthetic result with low risk concerning the viability of the transferred skin. The technique, similar to supraclavicular island flap harvesting, is easy to perform and is attractive in patients at risk for poor or delayed healing such as smokers or patients with complex medical histories.
Di Benedetto
Giovanni
G
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marche Polytechnical University, Ancona, Italy. dibenplast@hotmail.com
Aquinati
Angelica
A
Pierangeli
Marina
M
Scalise
Alessandro
A
Bertani
Aldo
A
D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D002056:Burns / Q000601:surgery; D002277:Carcinoma / Q000601:surgery; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006257:Head / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007822:Laryngeal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009062:Mouth Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D009333:Neck / Q000601:surgery*; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000601:surgery; D010307:Parotid Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000601:surgery; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D012782:Shoulder / Q000601:surgery*; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000098:blood supply; D016896:Treatment Outcome