Examining inhibition of return with onset and offset cues in the multiple-cuing paradigm.
Three experiments examined inhibition of return (IOR) with onset and offset cues in a multiple-cuing paradigm. In the first two experiments, five sequential cues either appeared and remained present (onset cues) or disappeared and remained absent (offset cues). In the third experiment, the cues were either onset cues or on-off cues (appeared and then disappeared quickly after). With placeholders present, onset and offset cues produced similar declines in IOR from the most recently cued location (Experiment 1). In contrast, onset cues produced overall more IOR than on-off cues (Experiment 3). With placeholders absent (Experiment 2), no IOR was found for either onset or offset cues. The results suggest that even in a complex multiple-cuing paradigm, onsets and offsets are treated similarly by the attentional system. Furthermore, it appears that onset cues are easier to encode as previously searched than on-off cues, suggesting a role of working memory in IOR. Finally, when multiple locations are cued sequentially by onsets and offsets they must be marked by placeholders for inhibition to occur.
Birmingham
Elina
E
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. elina@psych.ubc.ca
Pratt
Jay
J
D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008568:Memory; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception; D014796:Visual Perception