A comparative study of white mineral trioxide aggregate and white Portland cements using X-ray microanalysis.
The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the composition of white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) and two different white Portland cements (WPCs). Samples of WMTA and WPCs were prepared and then imaged in a JEOL JSM6400 scanning electron microscope, equipped with an Oxford Instruments light element energy dispersive spectrometer detector for determining the elemental composition. Electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) results indicated that lime (CaO) and silica (SiO2) were the dominant compounds in each case. The results showed that the trace elements are similar in all of the samples but there was no detectable trace of bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) in WPCs. The range of crystal sizes observed in WMTA was found to be distinctly smaller than those observed in the WPCs. It was concluded that there is no significant difference between the dominant compounds in both WMTA and WPCs except the presence of bismuth oxide in WMTA.
Asgary
Saeed
S
Endodontic Department, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parirokh
Masoud
M
Eghbal
Mohammed Jafar
MJ
Brink
Frank
F
D017607:Aluminum Compounds / Q000032:analysis*; D001729:Bismuth / Q000032:analysis; D017610:Calcium Compounds / Q000032:analysis*; D003461:Crystallography; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000032:analysis*; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004577:Electron Probe Microanalysis; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D010087:Oxides / Q000032:analysis*; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials / Q000032:analysis*; D017640:Silicates / Q000032:analysis*; D012822:Silicon Dioxide / Q000032:analysis
D017607:Aluminum Compounds; D017610:Calcium Compounds; D003738:Dental Cements; D004338:Drug Combinations; D010087:Oxides; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D017640:Silicates; C086631:mineral trioxide aggregate; D012822:Silicon Dioxide; C033301:bismuth oxide; C016538:lime; D001729:Bismuth