title: Is evolution finished?
abstract: Since speciation seems to be no longer in progress, one is compelled to conclude that sexual reproduction is incompetent as a macroevolutionary device. I propose that the reason some might insist that evolution is still in progress stems primarily from the influence of two authorities, the geologist Charles Lyell, with his doctrine of uniformitarianism and Gregor Mendel, the discoverer of sexually mediated transmission genetics. William Bateson, the father of modern genetics, clearly foresaw the failure of Mendelism to explain macroevolutionary change, a perspective with which I am in full agreement.
authors.affiliation: University of Vermont, USA.
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Davison
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D055593:Geological Phenomena; D005844:Geology; D040941:Heredity; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012098:Reproduction / Q000235:genetics