title: Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
abstract: Victim impact evidence was varied in a brief trial scenario given to 120 participants eligible for jury service. The scenario concerned the murder trial of a disgruntled employee accused of bombing his former workplace. Participants read either no victim impact evidence or one of three victim impact statements. For the victim impact statements, we varied the identity of the witness. The victim impact statement was given by either the wife of the victim, a coworker of the victim, or a firefighter called to the crime scene. Results revealed that only the victim impact evidence given by the coworker lead to harsher sentencing judgments. However, participants rated the suffering of the victim's wife as most severe, indicating that perceptions of suffering may not predict sentencing judgments in a straightforward manner. Implications for these findings for legal decisions such as Payne v. Tennessee (1991) are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Alliant International University, Fresno, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Mila Green
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: McGowan
authors.forename: Bryan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Myers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology*; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D012933:Social Identification; D012938:Social Perception; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires