title: Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The REMATCH trial compared the use of left ventricular assist devices with optimal medical management for patients with end-stage heart failure. When the trial met its primary end point criteria in July 2001, left ventricular assist device therapy was shown to significantly improve survival and quality of life. With extended follow-up, 2 critical questions emerge: (1) Did these benefits persist, and (2) did outcomes improve over the course of the trial, given the evolving nature of the technology?
  
  
  METHODS
  We analyzed survival in this randomized trial by using the product-limit method of Kaplan and Meier. Changes in the benefits of therapy were analyzed by examining the effect of the enrollment period.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The survival rates for patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (n = 68) versus patients receiving optimal medical management (n = 61) were 52% versus 28% at 1 year and 29% versus 13% at 2 years ( P = .008, log-rank test). As of July 2003, 11 patients were alive on left ventricular assist device support out of a total 16 survivors (including 3 patients receiving optimal medical management who crossed over to left ventricular assist device therapy). There was a significant improvement in survival for left ventricular assist device-supported patients who enrolled during the second half of the trial compared with the first half ( P = .03). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure scores improved significantly over the course of the trial.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The extended follow-up confirms the initial observation that left ventricular assist device therapy renders significant survival and quality-of-life benefits compared with optimal medical management for patients with end-stage heart failure. Furthermore, we observed an improvement in the survival of patients receiving left ventricular assist devices over the course of the trial, suggesting the effect of greater clinical experience.
authors.affiliation: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. ParkS@sutterhealth.org
authors.forename: Soon J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Alfred
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tector
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Piccioni
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Raines
authors.forename: Annetine
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gelijns
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Moskowitz
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Rose
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Holman
authors.forename: Satoshi
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Furukawa
authors.forename: O Howard
authors.initials: OH
authors.lastname: Frazier
authors.forename: Walter
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Dembitsky
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002423:Cause of Death; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003422:Critical Care; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy*; D016027:Heart Transplantation; D006353:Heart-Assist Devices; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011336:Probability; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011788:Quality of Life; D012016:Reference Values; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D018487:Ventricular Dysfunction, Left / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy*; D014850:Waiting Lists