title: Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
abstract: Previous research shows that expert testimony on eyewitness memory influences mock-juror judgments. We examined the extent to which opposing expert testimony mitigates the impact of defense-only expert testimony. Participants (N = 497) viewed a video-taped trial involving an eyewitness identification and individually rendered verdicts and evaluated the evidence and the experts. We manipulated the Foils (unbiased vs. biased) and Instructions (unbiased vs. biased) of the lineup and Expert Testimony (no expert vs. defense-only expert vs. opposing experts). Expert testimony did not significantly influence juror judgments, but the opposing expert testimony diminished the credibility of the defense expert in the eyes of the jurors. Results point to the need for further research on conditions that qualify the impact of expert testimony.
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225-9089, USA. Jennifer.Devenport@wwu.edu
authors.forename: Jennifer L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Devenport
authors.forename: Brian L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Cutler
mesh_terms: D003415:Crime; D003416:Criminal Law; D003657:Decision Making; D005104:Expert Testimony; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D033222:Judicial Role; D011287:Prejudice; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires