Monitoring outcomes with relational databases: does it improve quality of care?
There are 3 key ingredients in improving quality of medial care: 1) using a scientific process of improvement, 2) executing the process at the lowest possible level in the organization, and 3) measuring the results of any change reliably. Relational databases when used within these guidelines are of great value in these efforts if they contain reliable information that is pertinent to the project and used in a scientific process of quality improvement by a front line team. Unfortunately, the data are frequently unreliable and/or not pertinent to the local process and is used by persons at very high levels in the organization without a scientific process and without reliable measurement of the outcome. Under these circumstances the effectiveness of relational databases in improving care is marginal at best, frequently wasteful and has the potential to be harmful. This article explores examples of these concepts.
Clemmer
Terry P
TP
LDS Hospital, Intermountain Health Care, 8th Ave & C St, Salt Lake City, UT 84143, USA. tclemme@ihc.com
D019985:Benchmarking; D016208:Databases, Factual / Q000592:standards; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical; D006751:Hospital Information Systems / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D009096:Multi-Institutional Systems; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods*