title: Spinal or epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section? A Swedish experience.
abstract: Ninety seven women undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were randomly divided into two groups, group 1 received spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and group 2 received mepivacaine 20 mg/ml with adrenaline 5 microg/ml via an epidural catheter. All patients were given a preload of Ringer acetate and Macrodex prior to onset of anaesthesia. Ephedrine 5 mg was given if the systolic blood pressure fell below 100 mmHg. There was a small (<30%) but significant (P<0.01) fall in blood pressure in both groups of women. Six women in the epidural group required supplemental analgesics during the operation compared to only 1 patient in the spinal group (P<0.01). Muscle relaxation was judged to be inadequate in 3 patients in the spinal group and in 5 patients in the epidural group. One patient in the spinal group had a characteristic post-spinal headache lasting 3 days. The injection-delivery time was shorter (P<0.01) in the spinal group compared to the epidural group. The Apgar scores at 1 and 5 min were similar in both groups. The results from our study suggest that spinal anaesthesia is a good alternative to epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. A fall in blood pressure, which is equally possible in both groups of patients, should be prevented by adequate fluid preload and treated immediately by intravenous ephedrine.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, S-581 85 Linköping, Sweden.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Vegfors
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Cederholm
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lindgren
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Berg