Open versus laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in live related renal transplantation.
BACKGROUND
This analysis sought to evaluate the efficiency and safety of laparoscopic nephrectomy (LDN) for the donor, the recipient, and the graft. LDN seems to have advantages over the open donor nephrectomy (ODN) in length of hospital stay, postoperative comfort, and pain control.


METHODS
The results of 40 patients who underwent LDN between October 2000 and September 2003 were compared to those of 40 ODN patients just preceding the LDN patients. Eight laparoscopy patients required conversion to an open procedure due to bleeding (4; two major and two minor), technical problems with the instrument (n = 1) and difficulty in the dissection (n = 3).


RESULTS
The demographic data, percentages of right and left nephrectomy, number of vessels, rates of acute rejection episodes, as well as the rates of urologic and vascular complications were similar between the two groups. The time of hospital stay was shorter, and the duration of the operation and of the warm ischemia time were significantly longer for the LDN group. The postoperative decline in serum creatinine levels were similar for the two groups. Graft survival rates were 91.7% at both the first and third years in the LDN group; 92.5% and 87.0% for the ODN group, a difference that was not statistically significant.


CONCLUSIONS
LDN is as efficient and safe as ODN for donors, recipients, and grafts.
Kaçar
S
S
SSK Tepecik Teaching Hospital, Organ Transplantation, Izmir, Turkey.
Gürkan
A
A
Karaca
C
C
Varilsüha
C
C
Karaoğlan
M
M
Akman
F
F
D015331:Cohort Studies; D006801:Humans; D019520:Living Donors; D009392:Nephrectomy / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D014019:Tissue Donors; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods*