Is there a way for pathologists to decrease interobserver variability in the diagnosis of dysplasia?
Many obstacles interfere with our efforts to screen patients with Barrett esophagus. Probably the largest is choosing the appropriate patient group for screening. Beyond this problem, sampling error on the part of endoscopists is probably more serious a problem than observer variation among pathologists reviewing patient samples. Pathologists agree well on lesions that merit close follow-up or other intervention (high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma), although interobserver agreement between pathologists interpreting lesser lesions is not good. This lack of agreement is not likely to improve substantially, and many adjunct markers are being sought in an attempt to identify patients with lesions of lower grades that are most likely to progress, allowing doctors to identify patients who would benefit from upgraded surveillance.
Montgomery
Elizabeth
E
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA. emontgom@jhmi.edu
D001471:Barrett Esophagus / Q000175:diagnosis; D000013:Congenital Abnormalities / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D015588:Observer Variation; D010336:Pathology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*