title: [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Using a patient study to prove the clinical relevance of a comparison of five different radiographic systems for the chest conducted with an anthropomorphic chest phantom. Depending on the results, it was tested whether the performance of a modern digital system with a transparent imaging plate can be improved by changing the post-processing of the image.
  
  
  METHODS
  Chest radiographs of patients were taken with a CsI/aSi-flat panel detector (FDR), transparent imaging plate (tDLR), selenium drum detector (DSR), conventional storage phosphor plate (DLR) and asymmetrical screen-film-system (aFFS), and compared using image criteria scoring (ICS) and visual grading analysis (VGA) for anatomical structures (modified criterions of the EUR 16 260 EN guidelines). After optimizing the post processing, the images of the tDLR-system were evaluated once more in a phantom ROC study and patient VGA study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The flat panel detector-system proved to meet best the anatomical image quality criteria, followed by DSR, tDLR, aFFS and DLR. The modified post processing of the tDLR-images resulted in a significantly better detection of simulated pathological lung-structures, but improved the perceptibility of anatomical structures only slightly.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of the patient VGA study and the phantom ROC study are similar and considered valid. The new digital imaging systems with flat panel detector and transparent imaging plate provide the best image quality of the tested radiographic devices for chest imaging, assuming that all system components are attuned and optimized for the type of structure to be detected. Image processing is of primary importance for system optimization.
authors.affiliation: Klinik für Diagnostische Radiologie der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg.
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Redlich
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hoeschen
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Effenberger
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fessel
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Preuss
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Reissberg
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Scherlach
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Döhring
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D012372:ROC Curve; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity