title: Basic science faculty in surgical departments: advantages, disadvantages and opportunities.
abstract: The number of Ph.D. faculty in clinical departments now exceeds the number of Ph.D. faculty in basic science departments. Given the escalating pressures on academic surgeons to produce in the clinical arena, the recruitment and retention of high-quality Ph.D.s will become critical to the success of an academic surgical department. This success will be as dependent on the surgical faculty understanding the importance of the partnership as the success of the Ph.D. investigator. Tighter alignment among the various clinical and research programs and between surgeons and basic scientists will facilitate the generation of new knowledge that can be translated into useful products and services (thus improving care). To capitalize on what Ph.D.s bring to the table, surgery departments may need to establish a more formal research infrastructure that encourages the ongoing exchange of ideas and resources. Physically removing barriers between the research groups, encouraging the open exchange of techniques and observations and sharing core laboratories is characteristic of successful research teams. These strategies can meaningfully contribute to developing successful training program grants, program projects and bringing greater research recognition to the department of surgery.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, USA.
authors.forename: Mala R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Chinoy
authors.forename: Jay
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Moskowitz
authors.forename: Douglas W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Wilmore
authors.forename: Wiley W
authors.initials: WW
authors.lastname: Souba
mesh_terms: D005180:Faculty, Medical; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D012106:Research; D012586:Science