Calculation of standard atomic volumes for RNA and comparison with proteins: RNA is packed more tightly.
Traditionally, for biomolecular packing calculations research has focused on proteins. Besides proteins, RNA is the other large biomolecule that has tertiary structure interactions and complex packing. No one has yet quantitatively investigated RNA packing or compared its packing to that of proteins because, until recently, there were no large RNA structures. Here we address this question in detail, using Voronoi volume calculations on a set of high-resolution RNA crystal structures. We do a careful parameterization, taking into account many factors such as atomic radii, crystal packing, structural complexity, solvent, and associated protein to obtain a self-consistent, universal set of volumes that can be applied to both RNA and protein. We report this set of volumes, which we call the NucProt parameter set. Our measured values are consistent across the many different RNA structures and packing environments. When common atom types are compared between proteins and RNA, nine of 12 types show that RNA has a smaller volume and packs more tightly than protein, suggesting that close-packing may be as important for the folding of RNAs as it is for proteins. Moreover, calculated partial specific volumes show that RNA bases pack more densely than corresponding aromatic residues from proteins. Finally, we find that RNA bases have similar packing volumes to DNA bases, despite the absence of tertiary contacts in DNA. Programs, parameter sets and raw data are available online at.
Voss
N R
NR
Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, 260 Whitney Ave, P.O. Box 208114, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Gerstein
M
M
D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray; D008958:Models, Molecular; D009690:Nucleic Acid Conformation; D011487:Protein Conformation; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*; D012313:RNA / Q000737:chemistry*
D011506:Proteins; D012313:RNA