title: Intravaginal slingplasty: short term results.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Numerous surgical techniques have been described for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapses. In 1997, a new minimally invasive procedure was introduced by Petros: the infracoccygeal sacropexy, also known as Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS). This technique is used to place a mesh in the recto-vaginal fascia and to reinforce the uterosacral ligament by placing a polypropylene tape between the perineum and the vaginal vault. Since July 2002, we have changed our approach to the treatment of vaginal vault prolapses and now perform IVS. The aim of this study was to report our early experience and short-term results with IVS.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective single-institution non-randomized trial of patients who underwent IVS. Indications, intra- and post-operative complications were recorded as well as early post-operative results.
  
  
  RESULTS
  34 patients with a mean age of 60+/-13 years, were operated during a 12-month period. Surgical indications included rectoceles (n = 27), enteroceles (n = 26), cystoceles (n = 15) and hysteroceles (n = 9). 85% of the patients (n = 29) had more than one prolapse. Mean operative time was 63+/-19 minutes, with a 0% intra-operative complication rate. Post-operative complication rate was 2.9%: bleeding from an internal haemorrhoid required surgical haemostasis. Median post-operative stay was 3 days (range: 2-7 days). There was also one post operative complication (2.9%, a mesh erosion). Recurrence rate was 8.8% (two cystoceles and one rectocele recurred after surgery).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Posterior IVS provides a safe and efficacious treatment for posterior vaginal vault prolapses. Long-term results are required to assess the functional results and recurrence rate of the technique.
authors.affiliation: Les Cliniques Saint Joseph, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Liège, Belgium.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Biertho
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Dallemagne
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Dewandre
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Markiewicz
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Monami
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wahlen
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weerts
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jehaes
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011126:Polypropylenes / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013526:Surgical Mesh; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*
chemical_list: D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D011126:Polypropylenes