A review of the outcome expectancy construct in physical activity research.
BACKGROUND
Outcome expectancy is a central construct in social cognitive models of health behavior widely used as frameworks for physical activity research.


OBJECTIVE
This article provides a review of the outcome expectancy construct and its application to research on physical activity.


METHODS
Theoretical articles describing definitions and placement of outcome expectancy within social cognitive models, as well as empirical research on outcome expectancy and physical activity, were reviewed.


RESULTS
Self-efficacy theory, the transtheoretical model, the theory of planned behavior, and protection motivation theory differ in their labeling and conceptualization of outcome expectancy but unanimously include expected outcomes of behavior. Preliminary empirical investigation of the role of outcome expectancy in understanding physical activity has yielded mixed results. Positive outcome expectancy appears to be more predictive of physical activity in older adults than in young to middle-aged adults, and personal barriers appear to be the most predictive subtype of negative outcome expectancy. In addition, a small number of studies indicate relations between outcome expectancy and other theoretical variables, including behavioral intention, stage of change, and self-efficacy.


CONCLUSIONS
Further research on the role of outcome expectancy is necessary to design effective physical activity interventions. New directions in outcome expectancy research could involve (a) expanding the conceptualization of outcome expectancy to include expected outcomes of sedentary behavior and affective responses to physical activity, (b) further examination of potential moderators of the relation between outcome expectancy and physical activity (such as outcome value and outcome proximity), (c) distinguishing between the role of outcome expectancy in behavior onset versus behavior maintenance, (d) examining outcome expectancy as a mechanism of change in environmental intervention approaches, and (e) further analysis of interrelations between outcome expectancy and other social cognitive variables.
Williams
David M
DM
Center for Research in Health Behavior, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VA, USA. dwilliams2@lifespan.org
Anderson
Eileen S
ES
Winett
Richard A
RA
D001294:Attitude to Health; D001364:Awareness; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D009043:Motor Activity; D012106:Research / Q000592:standards*; D020377:Self Efficacy