Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations.
Posterior composite restorations have been in use for approximately 30 years. The early experiences with this treatment indicated there were more clinical challenges and higher failure rates than amalgam restorations. Since the early days of posterior composites, many improvements in materials, techniques, and instruments for placing these restorations have occurred. This paper reviews what is known regarding current clinical challenges with posterior composite restorations and reviews the primary method for collecting clinical performance data. This review categorizes the challenges as those related to the restorative materials, those related to the dentist, and those related to the patient. The clinical relevance of laboratory tests is discussed from the perspective of solving the remaining clinical challenges of current materials and of screening new materials. The clinical problems related to early composite materials are no longer serious clinical challenges. Clinical data indicate that secondary caries and restoration fracture are the most common clinical problems and merit further investigation. The effect of the dentist and patient on performance of posterior composite restorations is unclear and more clinical data from hypothesis-driven clinical trials are needed to understand these factors. Improvements in handling properties to ensure void-free placement and complete cure should be investigated to improve clinical outcomes. There is a general lack of data that correlates clinical performance with laboratory materials testing. A proposed list of materials tests that may predict performance in a variety of clinical factors is presented. Polymerization shrinkage and the problems that have been attributed to this property of composite are reviewed. There is a lack of evidence that indicates polymerization shrinkage is the primary cause of secondary caries. It is recommended that composite materials be developed with antibacterial properties as a way of reducing failures due to secondary caries. Post-operative sensitivity appears to be more related to the dentin adhesives' ability to seal open dentinal tubules rather than the effects of polymerization shrinkage on cuspal deflections and marginal adaptation.
Sarrett
David C
DC
Virginia Commonwealth University, 1012 East Marshall Street, P.O. Box 980549, Richmond, VA 23298-0549, USA. dcsarrett@vcu.edu
D001641:Bicuspid; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000737:chemistry; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000209:etiology; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000209:etiology; D018772:Dental Marginal Adaptation; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D019554:Dental Restoration Wear; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D003807:Dentin Sensitivity / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008422:Materials Testing; D008963:Molar; D010316:Particle Size; D044367:Phase Transition; D012008:Recurrence; D013499:Surface Properties; D014075:Tooth Discoloration / Q000209:etiology
D003188:Composite Resins