title: The relative benefit of word context is a constant proportion of letter identification time.
abstract: Letter identification is reduced when the target letter is surrounded by other, flanking letters. This visual crowding is known to be impacted by physical changes to the target and flanks, such as spatial frequency content, polarity, and interletter spacing. There is also evidence that visual crowding is reduced when the flanking letters and the target letter form a word. The research reported here investigated whether these two phenomena are independent of each other or whether the degree of visual crowding impacts the benefit of word context. Stimulus duration thresholds for letters presented alone and for the middle letters of 3-letter words and nonwords were determined for stimuli presented at the fovea and at the periphery. In Experiment 1, the benefit of word context was found to be the same at the fovea, where visual crowding is minimal, and at the periphery, where visual crowding is substantial. In Experiment 2, visual crowding was manipulated by changing the interletter spacing. Here, too, the benefit of word context was fairly constant for the two retinal locations (fovea or periphery), as well as with changes in interletter spacing. These data call into question both the idea that the benefit of word context is greater when stimulus quality is reduced (as is the case with visual crowding) and the idea that words are processed more effectively when they are presented at the fovea.
authors.affiliation: Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. fine@vision.eri.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Elisabeth M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Fine
mesh_terms: D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D013998:Time Perception; D014796:Visual Perception; D014825:Vocabulary