title: Examining the presence of computer-assisted instruction in physical therapy education.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare computer-assisted instruction (CAI) use in physical therapist (PT) and physical therapist assistant (PTA) education programs. Secondary purposes included examining faculty attitudes toward CAI, selection criteria, and evaluation criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to 389 PT and PTA programs. The total return rate was 52% (N = 201). Frequencies, percentages, and modes of responses were calculated for each questionnaire item. Eight percent of PT and 35% of PTA programs indicated that all faculty are using CAI, whereas 3% of PT and 6% of PTA reported that no faculty are using CAI. PT program respondents indicated using nine different types of CAI, whereas PTA programs indicated using eight different types. Fifty-seven percent of PT and 33% of PTA programs provide formal computer instruction. Forty-six percent of PT and 47% of PTA programs have a computer prerequisite. Nine percent of PT and 0% of PTA programs have mandatory computer ownership or lease policies. Positive aspects reported included improved knowledge of technology and independence with information gathering. Negative aspects reported included cost and time. Respondents were unsure whether different students benefit more from CAI (high or low aptitude, learning style) Results indicated that criteria for selecting CAI material are based on cost, ease of use, and compatibility with current systems rather than instructional design, and evaluation procedures included student outcomes and course evaluations. Contextual differences between PT and PTA probably account for differences in types and uses of CAI for PT and PTA programs. Instructor feedback is important when using CAI to teach psychomotor skills. More research is needed to determine if one type of student benefits more than others. Programs should consider the instructional design of CAI materials, in addition to practical aspects such as cost, and ease of use. We need to be aware of the instructional goals, content, and learners when selecting, designing, and using CAI.
authors.affiliation: Department of Human Performance and Applied Exercise Science, Division of Physical Therapy, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. merickson@hsc.wvu.edu
authors.forename: Mia L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Erickson
mesh_terms: D003194:Computer-Assisted Instruction; D004496:Education, Continuing / Q000379:methods; D004517:Education, Professional / Q000379:methods*; D010067:Ownership; D026761:Physical Therapy Specialty / Q000193:education*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States