title: Step-down compared to fixed-dose treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate in asthma.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are an effective treatment of asthma even when administered at a low dose. Once asthma is controlled, current guidelines recommend that the dose of ICS be reduced to the lowest possible and effective dose. Although the most appropriate strategy for the stepping down has not yet been defined, quantification of sputum eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) are indeed measures of asthma control.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the efficacy of step-down and fixed-dose strategies in the control of BHR to methacholine and eosinophilic inflammation patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a double-blind, randomized study to compare inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 1,000 microg/d, then reduced to 200 microg/d (group 1; n = 18) to a fixed dose of FP, 200 microg/d (group 2; n = 17) administered for 6 weeks and then 8 weeks in reducing the provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) and sputum eosinophils in 35 patients. The duration of the efficacy was also followed subsequently after 8 weeks of placebo treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PD20 remarkably increased with both treatment strategies, but differences between groups were not significant. Sputum eosinophils (median values, percentage) at baseline and after each treatment period were not different (group 1, 16.4 to 1.0 to 2.7%; group 2, 16.7 to 2.8 to 2.8%, respectively). The percentages of patients in whom sputum eosinophilia was normalized (< or = 3%) were as follows: group 1, 69% and 60%; group 2, 50% and 57%. After placebo treatment, sputum eosinophils were still "normalized" in approximately one third of patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Step-down and fixed-dose strategies with FP improved PD20 and sputum eosinophilia to a similar degree. The effect on sputum eosinophils persisted longer than that on methacholine.
authors.affiliation: Respiratory Pathophysiology Unit, Sesto San Giovanni Hospital, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy. antonio.foresi@aovimercate.org
authors.forename: Antonio
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Foresi
authors.forename: Berardino
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Mastropasqua
authors.forename: Alfredo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chetta
authors.forename: Raffaele
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: D'Ippolito
authors.forename: Renato
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Testi
authors.forename: Dario
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Olivieri
authors.forename: Andrea
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pelucchi
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000730:Androstadienes / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D001249:Asthma / Q000188:drug therapy*; D001985:Bronchial Provocation Tests; D001993:Bronchodilator Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D002452:Cell Count; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004804:Eosinophils; D005260:Female; D000068298:Fluticasone; D005541:Forced Expiratory Volume; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013183:Sputum / Q000166:cytology; D014797:Vital Capacity
chemical_list: D000730:Androstadienes; D001993:Bronchodilator Agents; D000068298:Fluticasone