title: What must we mean by "community"? A processive account.
abstract: The term "community" in ethics and bioethics traditionally has been used to designate either a specific kind of moral relationship available to rational agents or, in contrast, the context in which any sense of rational agency can even be understood. I argue that bioethics is better served when both "selves" and "community" are expressed through a more processive language that highlights the functional character of such concepts. In particular, I see the turn to "processive" community in bioethics as a turn towards method, contextualization, and narrative. In clinical practice, such a processive account demands that bioethics concentrate on methods of developing healthy dialogue and deeper understanding from within the problematic situation rather than trying to "fix" problems using ethical tools developed from outside the present situation. "Community," I argue, is in and of the interactive processes of inquiry itself. Such inquiry, such "communitying," requires that we engage individual patients in context; it demands more than simply gaining their permission or mere consent; it demands developing a supportive environment for participation.
authors.affiliation: University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Division of Medical Humanities, Little Rock 72205, USA. hesterdm@uams.edu
authors.forename: D Micah
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Hester
mesh_terms: D026688:Bioethical Issues; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007207:Individuation; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D018802:Patient-Centered Care / Q000941:ethics*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012945:Social Values