title: "Just say no": experts' late withdrawal from cases to preserve independence and objectivity.
abstract: An expert's decision to withdraw from a case at a late stage is an important and serious step with both forensic and ethical consequences. Preservation of a mutual right to terminate services at will is an essential (but all too often neglected) element of forensic work that can aid in immunizing the expert from threats to independence and objectivity. The authors examine the foundations of such a right, the potential obstacles to exercising it, the factors that might enter into such a decision, and the possible consequences of late withdrawal.
authors.affiliation: Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Thomas G
authors.initials: TG
authors.lastname: Gutheil
authors.forename: Harold
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Bursztajn
authors.forename: James T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Hilliard
authors.forename: Archie
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Brodsky
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D003657:Decision Making; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D033241:Lawyers / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States