title: [Attitudes on euthanasia and medical advance directives].
abstract: BACKGROUND
  With regard to medical decisions and measures at the end of life, the values and attitudes of those concerned are crucial. However, they have hardly been taken into account so far in German empirical studies on euthanasia and medical advance directives.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between October 2003 and May 2004, a mail survey of a representative group of internists, anaesthetists and general practitioners from Bavaria, Westphalia-Lippe and Thuringia was conducted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 1,557 mailed questionnaires 727 were returned (rate of returns: 46 %). The survey showed, high of appreciation for medical advance directives and, at the same, time scepticism regarding surrogate decision-making by legal guardians and authorized representatives. Furthermore, the survey revealed a considerable amount of uncertainty in the physicians about the application of certain measures at the end of life to the different forms of euthanasia. In practice, many physicians do not comprehend the juridical differentiation between (illegal) active and (legal) passive or indirect euthanasia.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In training and further education more scope should be given to the reflection of medical decisions at the end of life. At the same time, the usual, partly counterintuitive legal definitions should be brought more into line with medical decision making, while taking into account developments in English speaking areas. A transdisciplinary discourse is indispensable for the development of medical ethical and legal justifications suitable as guidance for action.
authors.affiliation: Modellvorhaben "Patienten als Partner", Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, und Abteilung Strahlentherapie, Klinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der FSU Jena. birgitt.oorscot@med.uni-jena.de
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: van Oorschot
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Lipp
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Tietze
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Nickel
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Simon
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016223:Advance Directives / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D000776:Anesthesiology; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003625:Data Collection; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005065:Euthanasia / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007388:Internal Medicine; D008297:Male; D018447:Medical Futility / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D008875:Middle Aged; D010819:Physician's Role / Q000523:psychology*