title: Comparing utility scores before and after hearing-aid provision : results according to the EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D.
abstract: Utility scores were estimated for 609 hearing-impaired adults who completed EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3) and SF-6D survey instruments both before and after being provided with a hearing aid. Pre-intervention, the mean utility scores for EQ-5D (0.80) and SF-6D (0.78) were significantly higher than the mean HUI3 utility score (0.58). Post-intervention, the mean improvement in the HUI3 (0.06 change) was significantly higher than the mean improvement according to the EQ-5D (0.01 change) or SF-6D (0.01 change). The estimated cost effectiveness of hearing-aid provision is therefore likely to be dependent on which instrument is used to measure utility.
authors.affiliation: MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, UK. grb@ihr.mrc.ac.uk
authors.forename: Garry R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Barton
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bankart
authors.forename: Adrian C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Davis
authors.forename: Quentin A
authors.initials: QA
authors.lastname: Summerfield
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006310:Hearing Aids / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D019986:Persons with Hearing Disabilities / Q000523:psychology*; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D018434:Sickness Impact Profile; D006113:United Kingdom