Inference vs control sentences: are readers able to detect our intended differences?
The reliance of comprehension processes on knowledge to form explanatory inferences has been well established (Grasser, Singer, & Trabasso, 1994), yet the evidence that supports these studies is derived from sentence pairs that are largely unexamined. While some recent studies have suggested that the stimulus sentences utilized in comprehension research need further specification (Shears & Chiarello, 2004), there has been little 'normal reading' data provided that examines what readers are able to detect from traditional inference-requiring vs control sentence pairs. The current study utilized stimuli sentences that have historically been used to support inference research (Singer, 1995) as well as some newly developed sentences, to examine whether readers detect differences between control vs inference conditions, and to further examine whether readers could discern when inference sentences achieved an outcome or goal vs when these sentences did not achieve an outcome or goal.
Shears
Connie
C
Psychology Department, Chapman University, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92866, United States. shears@chapman.edu
Weiss
Eileen
E
D001364:Awareness; D032882:Comprehension; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011932:Reading; D012016:Reference Values; D012660:Semantics; D013850:Thinking