Small group health insurance: ranking the states on the depth of reform, 1999.
States are ranked based on the potential of their small group health insurance reforms to enhance health insurance uptake. Reforms were quantified based on their market impact potential. Five dimensions of reforms were identified, Access Improvement, Premium Reduction, Premium Differential Reduction, Continuity of Coverage, and Enhancing Valued Plan Features. The reform indices representing these dimensions were developed based on document review of state statutes, combined with actuarial judgment to identify and assign scores to market-relevant regulations in line with their impact potential. The distribution of the states' reform scores and rankings show wide variation in the depth and focus of their reforms. Only seven of the top ten states on the Total Reform index had consistently higher scores on two or more reform dimensions. The conceptual linkages between specific regulations and the documented small group market problems lead to normative expectations of an association between the depth of state reforms and the prevalence of uninsurance.
Xirasagar
Sudha
S
University of South Carolina, Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Health Services Policy and Management, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. sxirasagar@sc.edu
Samuels
Michael E
ME
Stoskopf
Carleen H
CH
Shrader
William R
WR
Hussey
James R
JR
Saunders
Ruth P
RP
Smith
Danielle T
DT
D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration; D020408:Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000145:classification* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States