Detention and deception: limits of ethical acceptability in detention research.
The core of Australia's response to asylum seekers who arrive in an unauthorised manner has been to detain them in immigration detention centres until they are judged to engage Australia's protection obligations or, if they do not, until they are returned to their country of origin. For a number of asylum seekers this has resulted in very prolonged detention. This policy has aroused a storm of controversy with very polarised positions being taken by participants in the debate. In particular, the claim has frequently been made (including by this author) that the circumstances and duration of immigration detention cause substantial harm to the mental health of a significant number of detained asylum seekers. A rational debate on the effects of detention has been hampered by the fact that the Australian government has not allowed researchers access to the detention centres in spite of persistent requests for access by professional bodies. This paper is written in response to the following questions posed by the Journal: Is there a case to be made for individuals agreeing to participate in research studies and for the wider population of current and future detainees to be involved in research without informing either the detention provider or the host nation? Is is legitimate for a researcher to engage in potentially deceptive actions in order to obtain access to such detention facilities to undertake research? What ethical framework should underpin such research? Although there is very little guidance in the literature on the ethical conduct of research in settings such as immigration detention centres, a consideration of the ethical implications of carrying out research in the manner raised by these questions leads this author to conclude that such research cannot be ethically justified. Governments must be persuaded to allow, and to provide substantial support for, ethically conducted research on all aspects of detention. There is also a need for the development of an explicit ethical framework for the conduct of research in settings characterised by a very problematic human rights context.
Minas
I H
IH
Centre for International Mental Health, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
D001315:Australia; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000941:ethics*; D008192:Deception; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D004641:Emigration and Immigration / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D045809:Human Rights Abuses; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D001523:Mental Disorders; D011057:Politics; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000941:ethics; D011640:Public Policy; D012036:Refugees / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology*; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000941:ethics; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics