Comparison of techniques for the extraction of the anti-cancer drug camptothecin from Nothapodytes foetida.
Extraction methods using stirring extraction, Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic extraction and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) were evaluated for the percentage extraction of camptothecin (CPT) and 9-methoxycamptothecin (9-Me-CPT) from Nothapodytes foetida. The extracts were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Methanol (90%, v/v) extracted high percentage extraction of CPT and 9-Me-CPT compared to ethanol (90%, v/v). The results shows that the percentage extraction of CPT and 9-Me-CPT from N. foetida by MAE was more efficient in short time followed by Soxhlet extraction, ultrasonic and stirring extraction methods. Maximum percentage extraction of CPT (2.67%, w/w) was obtained by MAE technique. MAE has need of 3 min, whereas ultrasonic extraction, Soxhlet extraction and stirring extraction techniques require 30, 120 and 30 min, respectively to leach higher percentage extraction of CPT and 9-Me-CPT. The times taken by the microwave extraction process was 40 times less than the Soxhlet extraction for percentage extraction of alkaloids. The present results show that the extraction efficiency and considerable saving of time by MAE was more competent than the other extraction techniques.
Fulzele
Devanand P
DP
Plant Biotechnology and Secondary Products Section, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Trombay, Mumbai 400085, India. dfulzele@apsara.barc.ernet.in
Satdive
Ramesh K
RK
D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D002166:Camptothecin / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000379:methods; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000737:chemistry*; D008872:Microwaves
D000972:Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; D002166:Camptothecin