title: Single-neuron responses and neuronal decisions in a vernier task.
abstract: Vernier acuity is a measure of the smallest horizontal offset between two vertical lines that can be behaviorally discriminated. To examine the link between the neuronal responses in a retinotopic mosaic and vernier acuity, we recorded the responses of single cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus to a vertical bar stimulus that was stepped in small increments through the receptive fields of cells. Based on the single-trial responses evoked by stimuli at different positions, we calculated the spatial resolution that could be achieved. If the stimulus could fall anywhere in their receptive fields, single neurons had spatial resolutions two times worse than previously reported vernier thresholds. Given the known coverage factor in a cat retina, we developed a two-stage decision model to examine how the responses of neurons in a retinotopic mosaic could be processed to achieve vernier acuity. In order for psychophysical thresholds to be accounted for by the responses of a single cell, the stimulus must fall in the quarter of the receptive field that provides the most information about stimulus position. Alternatively, both the absolute psychophysical threshold for vernier acuity and its dependence on stimulus length can be realized by pooling the responses of a few neurons, all located on one side of the bar stimulus.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: R Clay
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Reid
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):4002-15
references.pmid: 11356887
references.citation: Vision Res. 1977;17(8):941-7
references.pmid: 595400
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jun;55(6):1345-6
references.pmid: 4960305
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301-34
references.pmid: 4972033
references.citation: J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):1-24
references.pmid: 5761942
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325-46
references.pmid: 4196271
references.citation: J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):421-56
references.pmid: 4421622
references.citation: Vision Res. 1975 Oct;15:1137-41
references.pmid: 1166614
references.citation: J Physiol. 1975 Sep;251(1):167-95
references.pmid: 810576
references.citation: Vision Res. 1986;26(8):1263-71
references.pmid: 3798760
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Nov;82(5):1679-91
references.pmid: 3693709
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1987 Dec;58(6):1187-211
references.pmid: 3437330
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1990 Feb 22;292(4):497-523
references.pmid: 2324310
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1990 Nov;10(11):3543-58
references.pmid: 2230944
references.citation: Vision Res. 1991;31(2):253-66
references.pmid: 2017886
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1992 Sep-Oct;9(3-4):243-51
references.pmid: 1390384
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1001-9
references.pmid: 8441000
references.citation: Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2301-11
references.pmid: 8273294
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Apr;5(2):248-50
references.pmid: 7620314
references.citation: Nature. 1995 Nov 16;378(6554):281-4
references.pmid: 7477347
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Mar 15;17(6):2112-27
references.pmid: 9045738
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1997 Nov-Dec;14(6):1015-27
references.pmid: 9447685
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):685-9
references.pmid: 11248258
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(2):163-71
references.pmid: 10793894
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):270-6
references.pmid: 10700260
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;82(6):3527-40
references.pmid: 10601479
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1986 Apr;6(4):1160-70
references.pmid: 3701413
references.citation: Science. 1986 Feb 28;231(4741):999-1002
references.pmid: 3945816
references.citation: Nature. 1986 Feb 13-19;319(6054):591-3
references.pmid: 3945346
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Jul;2(7):1101-14
references.pmid: 3926970
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):147-55
references.pmid: 3973752
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am. 1983 Dec;73(12):1684-90
references.pmid: 6663371
references.citation: Vision Res. 1983;23(8):775-85
references.pmid: 6623937
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):1116-33
references.pmid: 6188819
references.citation: Vision Res. 1982;22(9):1173-83
references.pmid: 7147728
references.citation: Science. 1982 Mar 19;215(4539):1532-4
references.pmid: 7063863
references.citation: J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:117-41
references.pmid: 480198
references.citation: Science. 1979 Sep 7;205(4410):1015-7
references.pmid: 472720
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:227-77
references.pmid: 9530497
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;40(6):1369-91
references.pmid: 411897
references.citation: Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):681-93
references.pmid: 15288892