title: Physicians' evaluations of patients' decisions to refuse oncological treatment.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To gain insight into the standards of rationality that physicians use when evaluating patients' treatment refusals.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative design with in depth interviews.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study sample included 30 patients with cancer and 16 physicians (oncologists and general practitioners). All patients had refused a recommended oncological treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients base their treatment refusals mainly on personal values and/or experience. Physicians mainly emphasise the medical perspective when evaluating patients' treatment refusals. From a medical perspective, a patient's treatment refusal based on personal values and experience is generally evaluated as irrational and difficult to accept, especially when it concerns a curative treatment. Physicians have a different attitude towards non-curative treatments and have less difficulty accepting a patient's refusal of these treatments. Thus, an important factor in the physician's evaluation of a treatment refusal is whether the treatment refused is curative or non-curative.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Physicians mainly use goal oriented and patients mainly value oriented rationality, but in the case of non-curative treatment refusal, physicians give more emphasis to value oriented rationality. A consensus between the value oriented approaches of patient and physician may then emerge, leading to the patient's decision being understood and accepted by the physician. The physician's acceptance is crucial to his or her attitude towards the patient. It contributes to the patient's feeling free to decide, and being understood and respected, and thus to a better physician-patient relationship.
authors.affiliation: VU University Medical Center, Department of Philosophy and Medical Ethics, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, the Netherlands. t.vankleffens@vumc.nl
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: van Kleffens
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: van Leeuwen
mesh_terms: D001007:Anxiety; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011788:Quality of Life; D011908:Rationalization; D016312:Treatment Refusal
references.citation: Lancet Oncol. 2001 Nov;2(11):691-7
references.pmid: 11902540
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 4;346(14):1061-6
references.pmid: 11932474
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2325-36
references.pmid: 15047088
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1990 May 31;322(22):1595-9
references.pmid: 2336090
references.citation: BMJ. 1990 Jun 2;300(6737):1458-60
references.pmid: 2379006
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):146-52
references.pmid: 11773309
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 1991 Sep;17(3):124-30
references.pmid: 1941952
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1995 Dec 1;123(11):878-81
references.pmid: 7486472
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 1997 Oct;23(5):282-8
references.pmid: 9358347
references.citation: J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):358-62
references.pmid: 11055039
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(7):813-8
references.pmid: 2028276