title: Reconsidering evolved sex differences in jealousy: comment on Harris (2003).
abstract: In a recent article, Harris (2003) concluded that the data do not support the existence of evolved sex differences in jealousy. Harris' review correctly identifies fatal flaws in three lines of evidence (spousal abuse, homicide, morbid jealousy), but her criticism of two other lines of evidence (self-report responses, psychophysiological measures) is based, in part, on a mischaracterization of the evolutionary psychological theory and a misunderstanding of the empirical implications of the theory. When interpreted according to the correct criterion (i.e., an interaction between sex and infidelity type), self-report studies (both forced-choice and non-forced choice) offer strong support for the existence of sex differences in jealousy. Psychophysiological data also offer some support, although these data are weakened by validity-related concerns. In addition, some refutational evidence cited by Harris (responses to real infidelity, responses under cognitive load) actually does not refute the theory. An integrative model that describes how jealousy might result from the interaction of sociocultural variables and evolved sex differences and suggestions for future research directions are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115, USA. bsagarin@niu.edu
authors.forename: Brad J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Sagarin
mesh_terms: D001143:Arousal; D001288:Attention; D015982:Bias; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005114:Extramarital Relations; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D007578:Jealousy; D008297:Male; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012945:Social Values