title: Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies.
abstract: This is the second part of a review on the challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Feedback and the occlusion effect pose great challenges in hearing aid design and usage. Yet, conventional solutions to feedback and the occlusion effect often create a dilemma: the solution to one often leads to the other. This review discusses the advanced signal processing strategies to reduce feedback and some new approaches to reduce the occlusion effect. Specifically, the causes of three types of feedback (acoustic, mechanical, and electromagnetic) are discussed. The strategies currently used to reduce acoustic feedback (i.e., adaptive feedback reduction algorithms using adaptive gain reduction, notch filtering, and phase cancellation strategies) and the design of new receivers that are built to reduce mechanical and electromagnetic feedback are explained. In addition, various new strategies (i.e., redesigned sound delivery devices and receiver-in-the-ear-canal hearing aid configuration) to reduce the occlusion effect are reviewed. Many manufacturers have recently adopted laser shell-manufacturing technologies to overcome problems associated with manufacturing custom hearing aid shells. The mechanisms of selected laser sintering and stereo lithographic apparatus and the properties of custom shells produced by these two processes are reviewed. Further, various new developments in hearing aid transducers, telecoils, channel-free amplification, open-platform programming options, rechargeable hearing aids, ear-level frequency modulated (FM) receivers, wireless Bluetooth FM systems, and wireless programming options are briefly explained and discussed. Finally, the applications of advanced hearing aid technologies to enhance other devices such as cochlear implants, hearing protectors, and cellular phones are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. kingchung@purdue.edu
authors.forename: King
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Chung
mesh_terms: D000162:Acoustics; D038262:Auditory Brain Stem Implants / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D003054:Cochlear Implants / Q000592:standards* / Q000639:trends; D055590:Electromagnetic Phenomena; D004869:Equipment Safety; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D005544:Forecasting; D006310:Hearing Aids / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D006319:Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D007834:Lasers; D008297:Male; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D017755:Prosthesis Fitting; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2004;8(3):83-124
references.pmid: 15678225
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 2003;7(4):117-61
references.pmid: 15004650
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1982 Jan-Feb;3(1):12-7
references.pmid: 7060839
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2665-73
references.pmid: 10830388
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Nov;106(5):2821-33
references.pmid: 10573898
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2872-80
references.pmid: 1629480
references.citation: Scand Audiol. 1991;20(1):49-53
references.pmid: 1842269
references.citation: J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(1):8-16
references.pmid: 8263831
references.citation: Ear Hear. 2002 Aug;23(4):325-38
references.pmid: 12195175
references.citation: Scand Audiol Suppl. 2001;(52):69-72
references.pmid: 11318487
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1547-52
references.pmid: 8473608
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Jul;110(1):529-42
references.pmid: 11508977
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1807-18
references.pmid: 8817914
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Jun;105(6):3481-96
references.pmid: 10380671
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1976 Jul;60(1):139-54
references.pmid: 956521
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Aug;106(2):1010-9
references.pmid: 10462806
references.citation: Scand Audiol. 1990;19(2):89-95
references.pmid: 2371540
references.citation: Trends Amplif. 1996 Jun;1(2):45-82
references.pmid: 25425855