Learning letter identification in peripheral vision.
Performance for a variety of visual tasks improves with practice. The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the processes underlying perceptual learning of identifying letters in peripheral vision. To do so, we tracked changes in contrast thresholds for identifying single letters presented at 10 degrees in the inferior visual field, over a period of six consecutive days. The letters (26 lowercase Times-Roman letters, subtending 1.7 degrees) were embedded within static two-dimensional Gaussian luminance noise, with rms contrast ranging from 0% (no noise) to 20%. We also measured the observers' response consistency using a double-pass method on days 1, 3 and 6, by testing two additional blocks on each of these days at luminance noise of 3% and 20%. These additional blocks were the exact replicates of the corresponding block at the same noise contrast that was tested on the same day. We analyzed our results using both the linear amplifier model (LAM) and the perceptual template model (PTM). Our results showed that following six days of training, the overall reduction (improvement across all noise levels) in contrast threshold for our seven observers averaged 21.6% (range: 17.2-31%). Despite fundamental differences between LAM and PTM, both models show that learning leads to an improvement of the perceptual template (filter) such that the template is more capable of extracting the crucial information from the signal. Results from both the PTM analysis and the double-pass experiment imply that the stimulus-dependent component of the internal noise does not change with learning.
Chung
Susana T L
ST
College of Optometry and Center for Neuro-Engineering and Cognitive Science, University of Houston, 505 J Davis Armistead Bldg, Houston, TX 77204-2020, USA. schung@optometry.uh.edu
Levi
Dennis M
DM
Tjan
Bosco S
BS
D000328:Adult; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011601:Psychophysics; D011932:Reading; D012438:Saccades; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D014794:Visual Fields; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Vision Res. 2001 Jan;41(1):47-52
11163615
Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):176-8
10647007
Vision Res. 1999 Sep;39(19):3197-221
10615491
Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):725-43
11248262
J Vis. 2002;2(2):190-203
12678592
Nature. 2003 Jun 12;423(6941):752-6
12802334
J Vis. 2004;4(1):44-56
14995898
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Feb;7(2):178-83
14730311
Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(7):695-709
14751554
Percept Psychophys. 1978 Sep;24(3):258-62
704286
Nature. 1980 Sep 4;287(5777):43-4
7412873
Vision Res. 1981;21(7):1149-58
7314493
Science. 1982 Nov 12;218(4573):697-8
7134968
J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):469-88
13429514
J Opt Soc Am. 1956 Aug;46(8):634-9
13346424
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13988-93
9811913
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Apr;37(5):869-77
8603871
Vision Res. 1995 Nov;35(21):3053-69
8533342
Vision Res. 1995 Jun;35(12):1679-90
7660576
Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(4):519-27
7900292
Vision Res. 1993 Feb;33(3):397-412
8447110
Science. 1992 May 15;256(5059):1018-21
1589770
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
2052578
J Opt Soc Am A. 1988 Apr;5(4):617-27
3404312
Vision Res. 1987;27(6):953-65
3660656
J Opt Soc Am A. 1987 Feb;4(2):391-404
3559785
Vision Res. 1985;25(7):963-77
4049746