title: Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from free-ranging deer and rabbits surrounding Minnesota dairy herds.
abstract: The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) among deer and rabbits surrounding infected and noninfected Minnesota dairy farms using fecal culture, and to describe the frequency that farm management practices were used that could potentially lead to transmission of infection between these species. Fecal samples from cows and the cow environment were collected from 108 Minnesota dairy herds, and fecal pellets from free-ranging white-tailed deer and eastern cottontail rabbits were collected from locations surrounding 114 farms; all samples were tested using bacterial culture. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to 114 herd owners. Sixty-two percent of the dairy herds had at least 1 positive fecal pool or environmental sample. A total of 218 rabbit samples were collected from 90% of the herds, and 309 deer samples were collected from 47% of the herds. On 2 (4%) of the farms sampled, 1 deer fecal sample was MAP positive. Both farms had samples from the cow fecal pool and cow environment that were positive by culture. On 2 (2%) other farms, 1 rabbit fecal sample was positive by culture to MAP, with one of these farms having positive cow fecal pools and cow environmental samples. Pasture was used on 79% of the study farms as a grazing area for cattle, mainly for dry cows (75%) and bred or prebred heifers (87%). Of the 114 farms, 88 (77%) provided access to drylot for their cattle, mainly for milking cows (77/88; 88%) and bred heifers (87%). Of all study farms, 90 (79%) used some solid manure broadcasting on their crop fields. Of all 114 farms, the estimated probability of daily physical contact between cattle manure and deer or rabbits was 20% and 25%, respectively. Possible contact between cattle manure and deer or rabbits was estimated to occur primarily from March through December. The frequency of pasture or drylot use and manure spreading on crop fields may be important risk factors for transmission of MAP among dairy cattle, deer, and rabbits. Although the MAP prevalence among rabbits and deer is low, their role as MAP reservoirs should be considered.
authors.affiliation: Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108, USA. raizm001@umn.edu
authors.forename: Eran A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Raizman
authors.forename: Scott J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Wells
authors.forename: Peter A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Jordan
authors.forename: Glenn D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: DelGiudice
authors.forename: Russell R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Bey
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic / Q000382:microbiology; D000835:Animals, Wild / Q000382:microbiology; D002417:Cattle; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial / Q000662:veterinary; D003670:Deer / Q000382:microbiology*; D004197:Disease Reservoirs / Q000662:veterinary; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D005260:Female; D008910:Minnesota / Q000453:epidemiology; D016927:Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D010283:Paratuberculosis / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000635:transmission; D006109:Poaceae; D015995:Prevalence; D011817:Rabbits / Q000382:microbiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Vet Res Commun. 2000 Nov;24(7):435-43
references.pmid: 11085463
references.citation: Am J Vet Res. 1956 Jul;17(64):549-51
references.pmid: 13340126
references.citation: Vet J. 2001 May;161(3):306-13
references.pmid: 11352488
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Sep;39(9):3080-4
references.pmid: 11526132
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002 Apr 1;220(7):1053-7
references.pmid: 12420786
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2002 Oct;38(4):729-37
references.pmid: 12528439
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2003 Jan;39(1):10-5
references.pmid: 12685064
references.citation: J Wildl Dis. 2003 Apr;39(2):323-8
references.pmid: 12910759
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2003 Oct 1;223(7):1022-5
references.pmid: 14552493
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2004 Sep;87(9):2959-66
references.pmid: 15375057
references.citation: Nord Vet Med. 1977 Jun;29(6):267-70
references.pmid: 331238
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979 Apr 15;174(8):841-3
references.pmid: 500426
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1981 Dec 1;179(11):1252-4
references.pmid: 7328012
references.citation: J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983 Jan 15;182(2):168-9
references.pmid: 6826436
references.citation: Cornell Vet. 1984 Jul;74(3):218-62
references.pmid: 6375961
references.citation: Am J Vet Res. 1985 Nov;46(11):2317-21
references.pmid: 4073642
references.citation: J Vet Diagn Invest. 1991 Oct;3(4):368-73
references.pmid: 1760476
references.citation: Am J Vet Res. 1992 Aug;53(8):1312-4
references.pmid: 1510305
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1993 Feb 27;132(9):213-6
references.pmid: 8451813
references.citation: Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1996 Jul;12(2):305-12
references.pmid: 8828107
references.citation: Vet Rec. 1997 Feb 8;140(6):141-3
references.pmid: 9050174
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1746-51
references.pmid: 10325318
references.citation: Vet Microbiol. 2000 Dec 20;77(3-4):231-51
references.pmid: 11118709