Single-neuron responses and neuronal decisions in a vernier task.
Vernier acuity is a measure of the smallest horizontal offset between two vertical lines that can be behaviorally discriminated. To examine the link between the neuronal responses in a retinotopic mosaic and vernier acuity, we recorded the responses of single cells in cat lateral geniculate nucleus to a vertical bar stimulus that was stepped in small increments through the receptive fields of cells. Based on the single-trial responses evoked by stimuli at different positions, we calculated the spatial resolution that could be achieved. If the stimulus could fall anywhere in their receptive fields, single neurons had spatial resolutions two times worse than previously reported vernier thresholds. Given the known coverage factor in a cat retina, we developed a two-stage decision model to examine how the responses of neurons in a retinotopic mosaic could be processed to achieve vernier acuity. In order for psychophysical thresholds to be accounted for by the responses of a single cell, the stimulus must fall in the quarter of the receptive field that provides the most information about stimulus position. Alternatively, both the absolute psychophysical threshold for vernier acuity and its dependence on stimulus length can be realized by pooling the responses of a few neurons, all located on one side of the bar stimulus.
Zhang
Ying
Y
Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Reid
R Clay
RC
D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*
J Neurosci. 2001 Jun 1;21(11):4002-15
11356887
Vision Res. 1977;17(8):941-7
595400
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1966 Jun;55(6):1345-6
4960305
J Neurophysiol. 1968 Mar;31(2):301-34
4972033
J Physiol. 1969 Jan;200(1):1-24
5761942
J Neurophysiol. 1973 Mar;36(2):325-46
4196271
J Physiol. 1974 Jul;240(2):421-56
4421622
Vision Res. 1975 Oct;15:1137-41
1166614
J Physiol. 1975 Sep;251(1):167-95
810576
Vision Res. 1986;26(8):1263-71
3798760
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Nov;82(5):1679-91
3693709
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Dec;58(6):1187-211
3437330
J Comp Neurol. 1990 Feb 22;292(4):497-523
2324310
J Neurosci. 1990 Nov;10(11):3543-58
2230944
Vision Res. 1991;31(2):253-66
2017886
Vis Neurosci. 1992 Sep-Oct;9(3-4):243-51
1390384
J Neurosci. 1993 Mar;13(3):1001-9
8441000
Vision Res. 1993 Nov;33(16):2301-11
8273294
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995 Apr;5(2):248-50
7620314
Nature. 1995 Nov 16;378(6554):281-4
7477347
J Neurosci. 1997 Mar 15;17(6):2112-27
9045738
Vis Neurosci. 1997 Nov-Dec;14(6):1015-27
9447685
Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):685-9
11248258
Vision Res. 2000;40(2):163-71
10793894
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):270-6
10700260
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;82(6):3527-40
10601479
J Neurosci. 1986 Apr;6(4):1160-70
3701413
Science. 1986 Feb 28;231(4741):999-1002
3945816
Nature. 1986 Feb 13-19;319(6054):591-3
3945346
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Jul;2(7):1101-14
3926970
J Opt Soc Am A. 1985 Feb;2(2):147-55
3973752
J Opt Soc Am. 1983 Dec;73(12):1684-90
6663371
Vision Res. 1983;23(8):775-85
6623937
J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):1116-33
6188819
Vision Res. 1982;22(9):1173-83
7147728
Science. 1982 Mar 19;215(4539):1532-4
7063863
J Physiol. 1979 Jun;291:117-41
480198
Science. 1979 Sep 7;205(4410):1015-7
472720
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:227-77
9530497
J Neurophysiol. 1977 Nov;40(6):1369-91
411897
Neural Netw. 2004 Jun-Jul;17(5-6):681-93
15288892