title: Temperature-dependent genome degradation in the coccoid form of Campylobacter jejuni.
abstract: Campylobacter jejuni undergoes a dramatic morphological transformation from a corkscrew-shaped rod to a coccoid form in response to unfavorable conditions. It has been speculated that the coccoid plays an important role in the survival and dissemination of C. jejuni but questions still remain regarding the viability of coccoid cells. Characterization of the genome of coccoid cells found that newly formed coccoid cells (i.e., 1-3 days) had a SmaI-digestion profile identical to that of spiral-shaped cells; however, there was a progressive degradation of the DNA with continued incubation at 37 degrees C. Concomitant with genome degradation was the detection of DNA in supernatants of coccoid cells. In contrast, cells incubated at 4 degrees C retained a spiral shape and their SmaI-digestion profile for 8 weeks and released little DNA into the medium. Thus, low temperature inhibited both coccoid formation and genome degradation. Collectively, these data support the theory that the coccoid form of C. jejuni is a manifestation of cellular degradation and spiral-shaped cells, or possibly coccoid cells formed at low temperature, are the most probable candidates for a viable but nonculturable form of this pathogen.
authors.affiliation: Department of Food Microbiology and Toxicology, 1925 Willow Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1187, USA.
authors.forename: Judith F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Hudock
authors.forename: Adam C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Borger
authors.forename: Charles W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Kaspar
mesh_terms: D016123:Campylobacter jejuni / Q000166:cytology* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000472:pathogenicity; D053938:DNA Fragmentation; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D016521:Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D013696:Temperature
chemical_list: D004269:DNA, Bacterial
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1994 Sep;77(3):303-7
references.pmid: 7989256
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Jun;62(6):527-37
references.pmid: 3624106
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Oct;65(10):4677-81
references.pmid: 10508106
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Feb;64(2):581-7
references.pmid: 9464397
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1986 Feb;60(2):103-10
references.pmid: 2422149
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Sep;67(9):4186-91
references.pmid: 11526022
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977 May;33(5):1225-8
references.pmid: 327932
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Oct;64(10):3917-22
references.pmid: 9758819
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 1992 Jan-Feb;15(1-2):153-63
references.pmid: 1622752
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1992 Jun;72(6):512-6
references.pmid: 1644708
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Sep;52(3):531-8
references.pmid: 3767358
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Mar;65(3):1110-6
references.pmid: 10049870
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 Jun;43(6):1393-9
references.pmid: 16346035
references.citation: J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Oct;137(10):2477-82
references.pmid: 1770362
references.citation: J Appl Bacteriol. 1987 Jan;62(1):43-51
references.pmid: 3571033
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 Jul;61(7):2713-9
references.pmid: 7618883
references.citation: Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1994 Nov;281(4):457-70
references.pmid: 7727892
references.citation: Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Feb;73(2):169-87
references.pmid: 9717575
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2000 Apr 10;55(1-3):263-7
references.pmid: 10791755