Characteristics of women undergoing repeat induced abortion.
BACKGROUND
Although repeat induced abortion is common, data concerning characteristics of women undergoing this procedure are lacking. We conducted this study to identify the characteristics, including history of physical abuse by a male partner and history of sexual abuse, of women who present for repeat induced abortion.


METHODS
We surveyed a consecutive series of women presenting for initial or repeat pregnancy termination to a regional provider of abortion services for a wide geographic area in southwestern Ontario between August 1998 and May 1999. Self-reported demographic characteristics, attitudes and practices regarding contraception, history of relationship violence, history of sexual abuse or coercion, and related variables were assessed as potential correlates of repeat induced abortion. We used chi2 tests for linear trend to examine characteristics of women undergoing a first, second, or third or subsequent abortion. We analyzed significant correlates of repeat abortion using stepwise multivariate multinomial logistic regression to identify factors uniquely associated with repeat abortion.


RESULTS
Of the 1221 women approached, 1145 (93.8%) consented to participate. Data regarding first versus repeat abortion were available for 1127 women. A total of 68.2%, 23.1% and 8.7% of the women were seeking a first, second, or third or subsequent abortion respectively. Adjusted odds ratios for undergoing repeat versus a first abortion increased significantly with increased age (second abortion: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.09; third or subsequent abortion: 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.15), oral contraceptive use at the time of conception (second abortion: 2.17, 95% CI 1.52-3.09; third or subsequent abortion: 2.60, 95% CI 1.51-4.46), history of physical abuse by a male partner (second abortion: 2.04, 95% CI 1.39-3.01; third or subsequent abortion: 2.78, 95% CI 1.62-4.79), history of sexual abuse or violence (second abortion: 1.58, 95% CI 1.11-2.25; third or subsequent abortion: 2.53, 95% CI 1.50-4.28), history of sexually transmitted disease (second abortion: 1.50, 95% CI 0.98-2.29; third or subsequent abortion: 2.26, 95% CI 1.28-4.02) and being born outside Canada (second abortion: 1.83, 95% CI 1.19-2.79; third or subsequent abortion: 1.75, 95% CI 0.90-3.41).


CONCLUSIONS
Among other factors, a history of physical or sexual abuse was associated with repeat induced abortion. Presentation for repeat abortion may be an important indication to screen for a current or past history of relationship violence and sexual abuse.
Fisher
William A
WA
Department of Psychology, Social Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont. fisher@uwo.ca
Singh
Sukhbir S
SS
Shuper
Paul A
PA
Carey
Mark
M
Otchet
Felicia
F
MacLean-Brine
Deborah
D
Dal Bello
Diane
D
Gunter
Jennifer
J
D000023:Abortion Applicants / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000028:Abortion, Induced; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003268:Contraception Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D009864:Ontario / Q000453:epidemiology; D011247:Pregnancy; D012742:Sex Offenses / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012747:Sexual Partners; D012749:Sexually Transmitted Diseases / Q000453:epidemiology; D013179:Spouse Abuse / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Fam Plann Perspect. 1978 Sep-Oct;10(5):286-8
700057
Annu Rev Sex Res. 1998;9:177-223
10349028
Womens Health Issues. 2001 Sep-Oct;11(5):436-41
11566286
Int Fam Plann Persp. 1990 Jun;16(2):59-65, 76
11659334
Appl Prev Psychol. 1993 Spring;2(2):101-13
12318905
Lancet. 2002 Apr 13;359(9314):1331-6
11965295
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002 Nov 29;51(9):1-9, 11-28
12495293
Obstet Gynecol. 1972 Dec;40(6):816-25
4636911
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Oct 1;126(3):316-20
961779
Health Educ Monogr. 1978 Spring;6(2):160-70
689890
JAMA. 1999 Oct 13;282(14):1359-64
10527183
Fam Plann Perspect. 1979 Jan-Feb;11(1):30-8
421875
Obstet Gynecol. 1980 May;55(5):630-6
7366922
Fam Plann Perspect. 1984 Mar-Apr;16(2):70-5
6723941
Psychol Bull. 1990 Nov;108(3):339-62
2270232
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37(4):254-9
8050730
Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Jul-Aug;27(4):162-5
7589358
Fam Plann Perspect. 1997 Jan-Feb;29(1):20-4
9119040
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):1002-6
9611013
Annu Rev Sex Res. 1998;9:39-76
10349025