title: Self-report versus interview data of women's subjective theories of illness: concordance and predictive validity in a psychosomatic-gynecological liaison service.
abstract: Between-method comparisons of patient data from standardized self-report instruments and corresponding patient interview data frequently have poor agreement. We investigated the concordance and predictive validity of self-report measures and expert-rated interview data of women's subjective theories of illness in a psychosomatic-gynecological consultation liaison service. 31 patients completed two questionnaires (KKG, PATEF) on subjective theories of illness and were interviewed with a semistructured instrument on the same topic at the time of the initial appointment and after 1.5 years. External criteria for assessing the predictive validity of questionnaire versus interview data were: follow-up participation and psychotherapy utilization during the follow-up interval. Questionnaire and interview rating data were only modestly associated. Rater concordance on the interview data was low. Neither the initial-assessment interview nor the questionnaire data had predictive validity for patients' participation in the follow-up. None of the interview rating data but a portion of the questionnaire data, had predictive validity for patients' utilization of psychotherapy during the follow-up interval. The cognitive conceptualization of subjective theories of illness may fail in patients with psychosomatic disorders, due to their very mode of experience. A wider approach that includes assessment of nonverbal communication and countertransference might be useful.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, University of Vienna Medical School, Austria.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fischer-Kern
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Leithner
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Voracek
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Löffler-Stastka
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Jandl-Jager
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Springer-Kremser
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006176:Gynecology / Q000379:methods*; D006296:Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011611:Psychosomatic Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires