title: Uterine restoration after repeated sloughing of fibroids or vaginal expulsion following uterine artery embolization.
abstract: The aim of our study is to present our experience with uterine restoration after repeated sloughing of uterine fibroids or transvaginal expulsion following uterine artery embolization (UAE) and to determine its safety and outcome. One hundred and twenty-four women (mean age, 40.3 years; age range, 29-52 years) with symptomatic uterine fibroids were included in this retrospective study. We performed arterial embolization with poly(vinyl alcohol) particles (250-710 microm). Clinical symptoms and follow-up information for each patient were obtained through medical records. At an average of 3.5 months (range, 1-8 months) after embolization, magnetic resonance imaging examinations with T1- and T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images were obtained for all patients. The mean follow-up duration was 120 days (90-240 days). Eight (6.5%) patients experienced uterine restoration after repeated sloughing of uterine fibroids or spontaneous transvaginal expulsion. The locations of the leiomyomas were submucosal (n=5), intramural (n=2) and transmural (n=1). The maximum diameter of the fibroids ranged from 3.5 to 18.0 cm, with a mean of 8.4 cm. The time interval from embolization to the uterine restoration was 7-150 days (mean 70.5 days). The clinical symptoms before and during vaginal sloughing or expulsion were lower abdominal pain (n=4), vaginal discharges (n=3), infection of necrotic myomas (n=2) and cramping abdominal pain (n=1). Gentle abdominal compression (n=1) and hysteroscopic assistance (n=1) were required to remove the whole fibroid. No other clinical sequelae, either early or delayed, were documented. Magnetic resonance images revealed the disappearance of leiomyomas, intracavitary rupture resulting in transformation of intramural or transmural myomas into submucosal myomas and localized uterine wall defects. Although the small size of this study precludes a strict conclusion, there appear to be few serious complications directly related to vaginal expulsion. Vaginal expulsion or fibroid sloughing is a possible course following UAE that is manageable, and the patients should be informed about this possibility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bundang CHA General Hospital, Pochon CHA University, 351 Yatap-dong, Bundang-gu, Sungnam-si, Kyonggi-do, 463-712, Republic of Korea.
authors.forename: Hye Ri
authors.initials: HR
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Man Deuk
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Nack Keun
authors.initials: NK
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Hee Jin
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Sang-Wook
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Yoon
authors.forename: Won Kyu
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Mee Hwa
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Lee
mesh_terms: D015746:Abdominal Pain / Q000209:etiology; D000328:Adult; D001158:Arteries; D003287:Contrast Media; D004621:Embolization, Therapeutic / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005682:Gadolinium; D006490:Hemostatics / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D015907:Hysteroscopy; D007889:Leiomyoma / Q000628:therapy*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008536:Meglumine; D008875:Middle Aged; D009336:Necrosis; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D011142:Polyvinyl Alcohol / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012449:Safety; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014594:Uterine Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D014599:Uterus / Q000098:blood supply*; D019522:Vaginal Discharge / Q000209:etiology
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D006490:Hemostatics; D009942:Organometallic Compounds; D008536:Meglumine; D011142:Polyvinyl Alcohol; D005682:Gadolinium; C072417:gadoterate meglumine
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Oct;10(9):1159-65
references.pmid: 10527191
references.citation: Acta Radiol. 2001 Mar;42(2):234-8
references.pmid: 11259954
references.citation: Lancet. 1995 Sep 9;346(8976):671-2
references.pmid: 7544859
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Apr;10(4):409-11
references.pmid: 10229467
references.citation: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999 Aug;6(3):279-84
references.pmid: 10459027
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2003 Apr;18(4):863-5
references.pmid: 12660286
references.citation: J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999 Sep;10(8):1135
references.pmid: 10496723
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Nov;175(5):1267-72
references.pmid: 11044020
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2002 Jan;77(1):176-8
references.pmid: 11779611
references.citation: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Aug;8(3):442-4
references.pmid: 11509790
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;98(1):29-34
references.pmid: 11430952
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May;190(5):1230-3
references.pmid: 15167823
references.citation: BJOG. 2002 Nov;109(11):1262-72
references.pmid: 12452465
references.citation: Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):428-31
references.pmid: 10796920
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 1999 Apr;44(4):373-6
references.pmid: 10319310