title: Staffing levels in not-for-profit and for-profit long-term care facilities: does type of ownership matter?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Currently there is a lot of debate about the advantages and disadvantages of for-profit health care delivery. We examined staffing ratios for direct-care and support staff in publicly funded not-for-profit and for-profit nursing homes in British Columbia.
  
  
  METHODS
  We obtained staffing data for 167 long-term care facilities and linked these to the type of facility and ownership of the facility. All staff were members of the same bargaining association and received identical wages in both not-for-profit and for-profit facilities. Similar public funding is provided to both types of facilities, although the amounts vary by the level of functional dependence of the residents. We compared the mean number of hours per resident-day provided by direct-care staff (registered nurses, licensed practical nurses and resident care aides) and support staff (housekeeping, dietary and laundry staff) in not-for-profit versus for-profit facilities, after adjusting for facility size (number of beds) and level of care.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The nursing homes included in our study comprised 76% of all such facilities in the province. Of the 167 nursing homes examined, 109 (65%) were not-for-profit and 58 (35%) were for-profit; 24% of the for-profit homes were part of a chain, and the remaining homes were owned by a single operator. The mean number of hours per resident-day was higher in the not-for-profit facilities than in the for-profit facilities for both direct-care and support staff and for all facility levels of care. Compared with for-profit ownership, not-for-profit status was associated with an estimated 0.34 more hours per resident-day (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.18-0.49, p < 0.001) provided by direct-care staff and 0.23 more hours per resident-day (95% CI 0.15-0.30, p < 0.001) provided by support staff.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Not-for-profit facility ownership is associated with higher staffing levels. This finding suggests that public money used to provide care to frail eldery people purchases significantly fewer direct-care and support staff hours per resident-day in for-profit long-term care facilities than in not-for-profit facilities.
authors.affiliation: Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.
authors.forename: Margaret J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: McGregor
authors.forename: Marcy
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cohen
authors.forename: Kimberlyn
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McGrail
authors.forename: Anne Marie
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Broemeling
authors.forename: Reva N
authors.initials: RN
authors.lastname: Adler
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schulzer
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Ronald
authors.forename: Yuri
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Cvitkovich
authors.forename: Mary
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Beck
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001955:British Columbia; D006269:Health Facilities, Proprietary / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008134:Long-Term Care; D009735:Nursing Homes; D010067:Ownership; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000078329:Workforce
references.citation: Health Rep. 1995;7(3):27-30
references.pmid: 8652801
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1996 Aug;36(4):512-7
references.pmid: 8771979
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Aug 25;323(7310):443-6
references.pmid: 11520849
references.citation: J Hosp Infect. 1999 Oct;43(2):85-100
references.pmid: 10549308
references.citation: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 Sep;55(5):S278-87
references.pmid: 10985299
references.citation: Gerontologist. 1994 Dec;34(6):775-86
references.pmid: 7843607
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2001 Sep;91(9):1452-5
references.pmid: 11527781
references.citation: BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):566-9
references.pmid: 11546707
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2004 Apr;39(2):225-50
references.pmid: 15032952
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1977 Apr;67(4):337-44
references.pmid: 848617
references.citation: J Aging Health. 1991 Nov;3(4):427-54
references.pmid: 10115033