Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance.
The ability to optimise muscular power output is considered fundamental to successful performance of many athletic and sporting activities. Consequently, a great deal of research has investigated methods to improve power output and its transference to athletic performance. One issue that makes comparisons between studies difficult is the different modes of dynamometry (isometric, isokinetic and isoinertial) used to measure strength and power. However, it is recognised that isokinetic and isometric assessment bear little resemblance to the accelerative/decelerative motion implicit in limb movement during resistance training and sporting performance. Furthermore, most people who train to increase power would have limited or no access to isometric and/or isokinetic dynamometry. It is for these reasons and for the sake of brevity that the findings of isoinertial (constant gravitational load) research will provide the focus of much of the discussion in this review. One variable that is considered important in increasing power and performance in explosive tasks such as running and jumping is the training load that maximises the mechanical power output (Pmax) of muscle. However, there are discrepancies in the research as to which load maximises power output during various resistance exercises and whether training at Pmax improves functional performance is debatable. There is also some evidence suggesting that Pmax is affected by the training status of the individuals; however, other strength variables could quite possibly be of greater importance for improving functional performance. If Pmax is found to be important in improving athletic performance, then each individual's Pmax needs to be determined and they then train at this load. The predilection of research to train all subjects at one load (e.g. 30% one repetition maximum [1RM]) is fundamentally flawed due to inter-individual Pmax differences, which may be ascribed to factors such as training status (strength level) and the exercise (muscle groups) used. Pmax needs to be constantly monitored and adjusted as research suggests that it is transient. In terms of training studies, experienced subjects should be used, volume equated and the outcome measures clearly defined and measured (i.e. mean power and/or peak power). Sport scientists are urged to formulate research designs that result in meaningful and practical information that assists coaches and strength and conditioning practitioners in the development of their athletes.
Cronin
John
J
New Zealand Institute of Sport and Recreation Research, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. john.cronin@aut.ac.nz
Sleivert
Gord
G
D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*; D010806:Physical Education and Training; D005082:Physical Exertion; D013177:Sports
Sports Med. 1996 Jul;22(1):19-37
8819238
Annu Rev Physiol. 1993;55:527-46
8466183
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(3):193-9
9088836
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):46-52
14508691
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1989 Mar;29(1):9-26
2671501
Acta Physiol Scand. 1999 Sep;167(1):57-68
10519978
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986 Aug;18(4):415-9
3747801
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 May;15(2):198-209
11710405
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(4):333-42
9134365
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Feb;16(1):75-82
11834109
Int J Sports Med. 1997 Oct;18(7):516-20
9414074
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):20-4
11708701
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1981;46(3):221-8
7195805
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995 Sep;35(3):169-75
8775642
J Sports Sci. 2003 Jan;21(1):49-57
12587891
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Jul;87(3):264-71
12111288
J Sci Med Sport. 2001 Mar;4(1):59-70
11339494
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Jan;74(1):359-68
8444715
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Oct;28(10):1321-6
8897391
J Strength Cond Res. 2004 Aug;18(3):401-4
15320652
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1995 Mar;35(1):13-9
7474987
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Feb;31(2):323-30
10063823
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981 Jun;6(2):87-92
7016357
Can J Appl Physiol. 1997 Aug;22(4):328-36
9263617
Acta Physiol Scand. 1985 Dec;125(4):587-600
4091002
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1998 Dec;38(4):286-93
9973770
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Feb;33(2):326-33
11224825
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Nov;25(11):1279-86
8289617
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1983;5(1):7-9
18806437
J Sci Med Sport. 2001 Jun;4(2):168-78
11548916
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 May;16(2):173-8
11991767
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Jun;39(2):120-2
10399419
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Aug;21(4):450-62
2779404
J Strength Cond Res. 2003 Feb;17(1):140-7
12580669
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):92-7
11708714
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Feb;15(1):30-5
11708703
Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;65(5):415-20
1425646