Feeder cell density--a key parameter in human embryonic stem cell culture.
A key issue in human embryonic stem (ES) cell culture that has largely been ignored is the high degree of variability in the murine embryonic fibroblast (MEF) feeder cell density, which has been reported by different studies and protocols. Presumably, too low a feeder cell density would result in insufficient levels of secreted factors, extracellular matrix, and cellular contacts provided by the feeder cells for the maintenance of human ES cells in the undifferentiated state. Too high a feeder cell density, on the other hand, may result in a more rapid depletion of nutrients and oxygen within the in vitro culture milieu, as well as physically hinder the attachment and growth of ES colonies during serial passaging. Preliminary investigations by our group revealed that an elevated MEF cell density of 32,000 cells/cm2, above the recommended value of 20,000 cells/cm2, appeared to be highly detrimental to the attachment and growth of serially passaged ES colonies of the H9 line (WiCell Research Institute Inc., Wilmington, MA, USA). At the edge of ES colonies that have attached to the higher density feeder layer (32,000 cells/cm2), the ES cells appear to stack up to form a "bulge." This was not observed under the recommended feeder cell density of 20,000 cells/cm2. By contrast, other established ES cell lines are routinely propagated at much higher feeder densities of 60,000 to 70,000 cells/cm2. This report briefly discusses the issue of MEF feeder cell density in relation to our preliminary observations, and the results of other studies.
Heng
Boon Chin
BC
Stem Cell Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, 119074 Singapore.
Liu
Hua
H
Cao
Tong
T
D000818:Animals; D018929:Cell Culture Techniques; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D005347:Fibroblasts / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D013234:Stem Cells / Q000166:cytology* / Q000378:metabolism
Stem Cells. 2003;21(2):131-42
12634409
Stem Cells. 2003;21(5):546-56
12968109
Stem Cells. 2004;22(1):51-64
14688391
Science. 1998 Nov 6;282(5391):1145-7
9804556
Nature. 1981 Jul 9;292(5819):154-6
7242681
Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Apr;18(4):399-404
10748519
Biol Reprod. 2003 Jun;68(6):2150-6
12606388
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 25;350(13):1353-6
14999088
Transpl Immunol. 2004 Apr;12(3-4):203-9
15157914
Hum Reprod. 2004 Mar;19(3):676-84
14998970
Nat Biotechnol. 2004 Jun;22(6):707-16
15146197
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Sep;20(9):933-6
12161760
Biol Reprod. 2004 Mar;70(3):837-45
14627547
Hum Reprod. 2003 Jul;18(7):1404-9
12832363
Biol Reprod. 2004 Dec;71(6):1772-8
15140800
Biol Reprod. 2003 Dec;69(6):2007-14
12930726
Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Oct;19(10):971-4
11581665
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Dec;78(12):7634-8
6950406