Enhancing the efficacy of the 20 m multistage shuttle run test.
OBJECTIVE
Maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2max)) of 44 ml kg(-1) min(-1) is an accepted criterion (Vo(2CR)) below which health and fitness for young male adults may be compromised. New algorithms validated for Vo(2CR) screening using the 20 m multistage shuttle run test (20mMST) were developed.


METHODS
Vo(2max) was assessed in 110 males using a stationary gas analyser in a treadmill test (TT) and in 40 of these subjects using a portable gas analyser in the 20mMST. Vo(2max) predicted from the 20mMST in 70 subjects was used for cross validation. Two equations predicting Vo(2max) during 20mMST (EQ(MST)) and TT (EQ(TT)) were developed.


RESULTS
Significant energy cost variance (EC(V)) was detected between TT and 20mMST (p<0.001), correlated significantly with subject height, and was a significant predictor of Vo(2max) differences between TT and 20mMST. The r(2) of EQ(MST) was 0.92 (p<0.001). Predicted Vo(2max) values from EQ(MST) correlated with directly measured 20mMST Vo(2max) at r = 0.96 (p<0.001). ANOVA detected no mean difference (p>0.05) between predicted and measured values. Prevalence of low fitness based on Vo(2CR) was 0.37. McNemar chi(2) indicated significant differences in sensitivity (p<0.001) and specificity (p<0.05) between the original 20mMST equation (EQ(LEG)) and EQ(TT), regarding Vo(2CR) screening. Cohen's kappa demonstrated higher agreement with TT Vo(2max) for EQ(TT) (p<0.001) than EQ(LEG) (p<0.05). TT Vo(2max) correlated with the end result of both EQ(LEG) and EQ(TT) at r = 0.75 (p<0.001). Unlike EQ(TT) (p>0.05), mean predicted Vo(2max) from EQ(LEG) was significantly higher compared to TT Vo(2max) (p<0.001).


CONCLUSIONS
These algorithms increase the efficacy of 20mMST to accurately evaluate aspects of health and fitness.
Flouris
A D
AD
Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catherines, Ontario, Canada L2S 3AI.
Metsios
G S
GS
Koutedakis
Y
Y
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology; D005080:Exercise Test / Q000379:methods; D017079:Exercise Tolerance / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010101:Oxygen Consumption / Q000502:physiology*; D005082:Physical Exertion / Q000502:physiology; D010809:Physical Fitness / Q000502:physiology; D012420:Running / Q000502:physiology; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013177:Sports / Q000502:physiology*
Br J Sports Med. 1997 Dec;31(4):314-8
9429009
Biochem J. 1920 Jul;14(3-4):290-363
16742941
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
2868172
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990 Jan;61(1):3-11
2405832
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003 May-Jun;23(3):193-200
12782903
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):296-304
12926714
Eur Heart J. 2003 Sep;24(17):1601-10
12964575
Can J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;28(2):272-82
12825335
Can J Sport Sci. 1992 Dec;17(4):304-8
1330269
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1990 Mar;30(1):19-23
2366530
Can J Sport Sci. 1989 Mar;14(1):21-6
2924218
Br J Sports Med. 1995 Sep;29(3):147-52
8800845
Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):141-4
3228681