title: [Risk of postirradiation induction of cancer of the modern methods of radiotherapy (3D CRT and IMRT) head and neck cancer].
abstract: Ionizing radiation is a known "universal carcinogen" for a wide variety of tumors in man. Human populations are exposed to radiation coming from natural and industrial environment, and from medical sources. However, these are radiotherapy patients who receive the highest doses. Radiation both mutates and sterilizes cells (lethal effect). The risk of cancer induction from cells that have received very high doses of radiation (therapeutic dose about 2 Gy) is lower then from the cells with low doses, since the majority of them will have been sterilized. The epidemiological studies based on the population of atomic bomb survivors have indicated that the most acceptable model of carcinogenesis is the linear non-threshold model. The evaluation of clinical risk related to a wide range of radiation doses, which range from 0.01 Gy to 2 Gy, is connected with many methodological problems such as: differences in treatment factors (dose range, irradiated volume, anatomical site), unknown epidemiological data (smoking abuse, comorbidity), shortening of the follow-up (short lifespan, migration), evaluation of small groups of patients. The most important difficulty is lack of the sufficient knowledge of genetic background which is probably most significant in carcinogenesis process. The introduction into clinical practice of a new sophisticated method of irradiation such as the three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) leads to the increase of low irradiation dose for very large volume of normal tissue. Thus, the evaluation of these new methods in the context of carcinogenesis is a very important objective in the future. Today, we can only introduce the most important questions concerned with the risk of carcinogenesis induction which await answers: what is the risk of induction of cancer due to the implementation of these new methods of treatment, and how important is this risk for clinical practice, especially in the case of combined radiochemotherapy? Despite a large body of experimental and clinical studies, radiation carcinogenesis is not fully understood yet. Additional problems related to the impact of irradiation of low dose on carcinogenesis are not resolved. For example, the bystander effect, the low dose hypersensitivity and the adaptive response could modulate the total response after irradiation, but the impact on the carciongenesis is unknown.
authors.affiliation: Zakład Radioterapii, Wielkopolskiego Centrum Onkologii, Poznaniu. piotr.milecki@wco.pl
authors.forename: Piotr
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Milecki
authors.forename: Krzysztof
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Szyfter
authors.forename: Janusz
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Skowronek
mesh_terms: D024201:Bystander Effect / Q000528:radiation effects; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D006801:Humans; D009381:Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced / Q000209:etiology*; D011878:Radiotherapy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D012307:Risk Factors