title: Computational model of electrically coupled, intrinsically distinct pacemaker neurons.
abstract: Electrical coupling between neurons with similar properties is often studied. Nonetheless, the role of electrical coupling between neurons with widely different intrinsic properties also occurs, but is less well understood. Inspired by the pacemaker group of the crustacean pyloric network, we developed a multicompartment, conductance-based model of a small network of intrinsically distinct, electrically coupled neurons. In the pyloric network, a small intrinsically bursting neuron, through gap junctions, drives 2 larger, tonically spiking neurons to reliably burst in-phase with it. Each model neuron has 2 compartments, one responsible for spike generation and the other for producing a slow, large-amplitude oscillation. We illustrate how these compartments interact and determine the dynamics of the model neurons. Our model captures the dynamic oscillation range measured from the isolated and coupled biological neurons. At the network level, we explore the range of coupling strengths for which synchronous bursting oscillations are possible. The spatial segregation of ionic currents significantly enhances the ability of the 2 neurons to burst synchronously, and the oscillation range of the model pacemaker network depends not only on the strength of the electrical synapse but also on the identity of the neuron receiving inputs. We also compare the activity of the electrically coupled, distinct neurons with that of a network of coupled identical bursting neurons. For small to moderate coupling strengths, the network of identical elements, when receiving asymmetrical inputs, can have a smaller dynamic range of oscillation than that of its constituent neurons in isolation.
authors.affiliation: Volen Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Cristina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Soto-Treviño
authors.forename: Pascale
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Rabbah
authors.forename: Eve
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Marder
authors.forename: Farzan
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Nadim
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001683:Biological Clocks / Q000502:physiology*; D003198:Computer Simulation; D046508:Culture Techniques / Q000379:methods; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D017952:Ganglia, Invertebrate / Q000166:cytology; D017629:Gap Junctions / Q000502:physiology*; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology; D009433:Neural Inhibition / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques / Q000379:methods; D009435:Synaptic Transmission / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;67(2):341-9
references.pmid: 1373764
references.citation: Neural Comput. 2000 Jul;12(7):1643-78
references.pmid: 10935921
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1991 Winter;3(4):487-497
references.pmid: 31167330
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;51(6):1345-61
references.pmid: 6145757
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Mar 15;89(6):2471-4
references.pmid: 1549611
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 Jun 5;38(5):805-17
references.pmid: 12797964
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Nov 4;402(6757):75-9
references.pmid: 10573419
references.citation: Science. 1990 Apr 6;248(4951):83-5
references.pmid: 2321028
references.citation: Science. 1979 Jul 20;205(4403):304-6
references.pmid: 221982
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2000 Feb;23(2):68-74
references.pmid: 10652547
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1993 May;16(5):186-92
references.pmid: 7685944
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1992;67(2):155-64
references.pmid: 1320945
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;81(3):1274-83
references.pmid: 10085354
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1980 Dec;44(6):1102-21
references.pmid: 6256508
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;67(2):332-40
references.pmid: 1373763
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1986 May;55(5):866-81
references.pmid: 3086514
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;51(6):1362-74
references.pmid: 6145758
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 15;20(18):6752-9
references.pmid: 10995818
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 1976;7(3):215-90
references.pmid: 11525
references.citation: J Neurocytol. 1997 Jun;26(6):349-66
references.pmid: 9278865
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1995 May;15(5 Pt 1):3640-52
references.pmid: 7538565
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):631-43
references.pmid: 12904487
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 1997 Jul;4(3):191-205
references.pmid: 9257232
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1987 Jul;7(7):2097-112
references.pmid: 3612231
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1994 Aug;175(2):233-49
references.pmid: 8071898
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):346-57
references.pmid: 13679411
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2005 Feb 4;94(4):048101
references.pmid: 15783604
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1982 Apr;97:153-68
references.pmid: 7086337
references.citation: Bull Math Biol. 1998 Nov;60(6):1167-200
references.pmid: 20957827
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1986 Jan 22;243(4):454-67
references.pmid: 2869069
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Nov 4;402(6757):72-5
references.pmid: 10573418
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 1995 Oct;75(4):689-723
references.pmid: 7480159
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 2003 Jul-Aug;15(1):53-69
references.pmid: 12843695
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1984 Jun;51(6):1375-93
references.pmid: 6145759
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1982 Dec;48(6):1378-91
references.pmid: 7153798
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Aug 1;19(15):6712-22
references.pmid: 10415000
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Feb 1;22(3):1002-9
references.pmid: 11826128
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 May;83(5):3084-100
references.pmid: 10805703
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1997 May;77(5):2736-52
references.pmid: 9163389