title: Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Women visit their doctors more than men, but comparatively few studies have explored gender differences in consultation in detail.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To identify the factors that predicted the number of primary care consultations in men and women over a 5-year period.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective cohort study with three waves of data collection by postal questionnaire.
  
  
  METHODS
  A single suburban general practice in Greater Manchester, UK.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consultation data were sought from primary care records on a random sample of 800 adults. The main outcome measure was the number of consultations over the 5 years of the study. Questionnaire measures included the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, the Illness Attitude Scales, a somatic symptom scale, a fatigue scale, and a functional assessment of disability.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Consultation data were obtained on 738 patients (445 women, 293 men, 92% of selected subjects). Longitudinal models of consultation over 5 years showed that changes in psychological distress were more strongly associated with consultation in women than in men, whereas cognitive factors (negative illness attitudes) were more strongly associated with the consultation rate in men than women.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The predictors of consultation in primary care may be different for men and women. A fuller understanding of the reasons for consultation may enable primary care doctors to better help individual patients, as well as perhaps contributing more generally to the development of gender specific interventions for those who consult unusually frequently.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester. nav.kapur@man.ac.uk
authors.forename: Navneet
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kapur
authors.forename: Isabelle
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Hunt
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lunt
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: McBeth
authors.forename: Francis
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Creed
authors.forename: Gary
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Macfarlane
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004739:England; D005194:Family Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011320:Primary Health Care; D012737:Sex Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(5):507-13
references.pmid: 3672148
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(2):191-202
references.pmid: 3585821
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 1990;34(5):525-34
references.pmid: 2231486
references.citation: J Public Health Med. 1992 Jun;14(2):131-7
references.pmid: 1515196
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53
references.pmid: 8463991
references.citation: Psychol Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):33-41
references.pmid: 7792360
references.citation: BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1008-12
references.pmid: 8616346
references.citation: Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):75-83
references.pmid: 8671107
references.citation: J Psychosom Res. 1996 Jan;40(1):95-104
references.pmid: 8730649
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(2):231-46
references.pmid: 9225411
references.citation: Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):119-25
references.pmid: 9613478
references.citation: Fam Pract. 1998 Jun;15(3):198-204
references.pmid: 9694175
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):413-9
references.pmid: 9972978
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1824-7
references.pmid: 10198500
references.citation: Psychol Med. 1999 Nov;29(6):1347-57
references.pmid: 10616940
references.citation: Fam Pract. 2000 Aug;17(4):298-304
references.pmid: 10934176
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):716-23
references.pmid: 11050788
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):181-7
references.pmid: 11177120
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Dec;51(473):987-94
references.pmid: 11766871
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):668-75
references.pmid: 12140357
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 2002 Sep;71(1-3):1-9
references.pmid: 12167495
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2004 May;34(4):719-28
references.pmid: 15099425
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Apr;54(501):248-53
references.pmid: 15113490
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Apr;54(501):279-81
references.pmid: 15113495
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(16):1107-23
references.pmid: 6623118
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Oct;142(10):1146-9
references.pmid: 4037124
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(3):289-92
references.pmid: 3961543
references.citation: J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Jan;175(1):20-5
references.pmid: 3806067
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Sep;30(3):282-304
references.pmid: 2778300