Outcome of calcaneal fractures treated operatively and non-operatively. the effect of litigation on outcomes.
BACKGROUND
The optimum management of calcaneal fractures is controversial. These injuries are frequently associated with compensation litigation, which effects the outcome.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the outcome of operatively and conservatively managed intra-articular calcaneal fractures and to examine the effect of compensation litigation on outcome.


METHODS
This was a retrospective study of calcaneal fractures from a single regional trauma unit, with management decided by the admitting consultant surgeon's preference. Fifty-four patients (33 operative, 21 conservative) with an average follow-up of 40 months (range 14-78 months) were reviewed. Sixteen patients (30%) were pursuing a compensation case resulting from the injury.


RESULTS
Despite similar fractures, medical co-morbidity and trauma energy, significantly worse outcome scores were seen in litigants (p < 0.0001). Footwear fitting problems were greater in litigants. Time off work was more than twice that of non-litigants (14.5 vs 6 months, p < 0.01). Results were similar between the operative and non-operative groups in terms of functional score, footwear problems and time off work.


CONCLUSIONS
Litigation was the major determinant of outcome following calcaneal fracture repair; highlighting the unreliability of subjective evaluation in determining outcome in the face of litigation. No subset of patients appeared to significantly benefit from internal fixation of their fracture.
Thornes
B S
BS
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Waterford Regional Hospital, Ireland. brianthornes@esatclear.ie
Collins
A L
AL
Timlin
M
M
Corrigan
J
J
D000041:Absenteeism; D002111:Calcaneus / Q000293:injuries*; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012775:Shoes; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014942:Workers' Compensation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Mar;75(2):196-201
8444936
Br J Surg. 1952 Mar;39(157):395-419
14925322
Injury. 1993 Apr;24(4):263-5
8325686
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Nov;75(6):932-7
8245085
Injury. 1996 Jan;27(1):35-8
8746314
Injury. 1998 Sep;29(7):499-501
10193490
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 May;(290):87-95
8472475
J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6(2):216-22
1534837
J Trauma. 1996 Nov;41(5):839-45
8913213
Int Orthop. 1999;23 (1):63-5
10192023
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975 Nov;57(4):413-21
1194308
Foot Ankle Int. 1996 Jan;17 (1):2-9
8821279
Foot Ankle Int. 1996 May;17 (5):253-8
8734794
Acta Orthop Scand. 1984 Dec;55(6):652-6
6524335
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 May-Jun;4(3):175-81
7552674
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jul;72 (6):852-9
2133368
Injury. 1998 May;29(4):305-8
9743753
Ir J Med Sci. 1997 Jul-Sep;166(3):124-6
9256543
Anesthesiology. 1978 Oct;49(4):239-43
697077