Correlation of radiographic and MRI parameters to morphological and biochemical assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration.
Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common finding in MRI scans and X-rays. However, their correlation to morphological and biochemical changes is not well established. In this study, radiological and MRI parameters of DDD were assessed and compared with morphological and biochemical findings of disc degeneration. Thirty-nine human lumbar discs (L1-S1), age 19-86 years, were harvested from eight cadavers. Within 48 h postmortem, MRIs in various spin-echo sequences and biplanar radiographs of intact spines were obtained. Individual discs with endplates were then sectioned in the mid-sagittal plane and graded according to the morphological appearance. Samples from the nucleus of each disc were harvested for biochemical analysis including water and proteoglycan contents. On MRIs, T2-signal intensity, Modic changes, disc extension beyond the interspace (DEBIT), nucleus pulposus shape, annular tears, osteophytes and endplate integrity were graded. On radiographs, an independent observer classified the parameters disc height, endplate sclerosis, osteophytes, Schmorl's nodes, intradiscal calcifications and endplate shape. General linear-regression models were used for statistical analysis. Backward elimination with a 10% significance cut-off level was used to identify the most significant parameters, which then were summed to create composite scores for radiography, MRI and the combination of both methods. The grading was performed by three observers, and a reliability analysis using Cronbach's alpha model was used to control interobserver agreement. The three radiographic parameters height-loss, osteophytes and intradiscal calcifications correlated significantly with the morphological degree of degeneration (p<0.001, R2=642). Significant differences of even one morphological grade could also be differentiated in the composite radiological score (p<0.05), except at the extremes between grades 1 and 2 and grades 4 and 5. All MRI parameters correlated significantly with the morphological grade (p<0.05); however Modic changes, T2-intensity and osteophytes accounted for 83% of the variation in the data. T2-signal intensity correlated significantly with H2O and proteoglycan content (p<0.001), and was best for detecting highly degenerated discs. Regression showed that the combined score was better correlated with the morphological grade (p<0.001, R2=775) than either the composite radiographic (p<0.001, R2=642) or composite MRI (p<0.001, R2=696) alone. Based on the combined score, a backwards elimination of the regression was performed, in which the parameters Modic changes, and T2-intensity loss (MRI) as well as calcifications (X-ray) accounted for 87% of the variability. The interobserver validation showed a high correlation for all three scores (Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.95 to 0.97).


CONCLUSIONS
Selective imaging parameters and a newly created scoring scheme were found to correlate with disc degeneration as determined in a morphological manner. Surprisingly, radiographic parameters were able to distinguish different stages of degeneration, whereas MRI could only detect advanced stages of disc degeneration. We conclude that X-rays may remain a cost-effective, non-invasive in vivo-grading method to detect early disc degeneration, and, combined with MRI, correlate best with morphological and biochemical assessment of disc degeneration.
Benneker
Lorin M
LM
AO Research Institute, Davos, Switzerland.
Heini
Paul F
PF
Anderson
Suzanne E
SE
Alini
Mauro
M
Ito
Keita
K
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001834:Body Water / Q000378:metabolism; D002356:Cartilage / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011509:Proteoglycans / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D011859:Radiography / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013128:Spinal Osteophytosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology; D013223:Statistics as Topic
D011509:Proteoglycans
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 15;25(4):487-92
10707396
Ann Rheum Dis. 1976 Apr;35(2):127-32
942268
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 May;15(5):411-5
2363069
Invest Radiol. 1988 Jun;23(6):447-54
3403204
Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;22(2):283-301
1826552
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Jul 1;24(13):1316-21
10404573
Eur Spine J. 1997;6(6):385-9
9455665
Eur Spine J. 1998;7(5):363-8
9840468
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jan 15;30(2):167-73
15644751
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Sep-Oct;135(5):394-402
9446431
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar;72(3):403-8
2312537
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):629-34
1862401
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1982;68(3):171-7
6212991
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 May;74(3):431-5
1587896
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jun;14(6):616-9
2749378
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987 Sep-Oct;11(5):855-8
2958523
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Nov;12(9):912-7
3441837
J Orthop Res. 1993 Sep;11(5):747-57
8410475
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1997;116(1-2):106-7
9006777
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;24(4):347-51
10445775
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1998 Jun;281:28-31
9771538
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Feb 15;21(4):415-20
8658243
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Sep;66(7):1048-55
6237110
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Sep;14(9):982-5
2528827
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):69-73
8208267
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Dec;40(6):900-7
9840835
J Clin Invest. 1996 Aug 15;98(4):996-1003
8770872
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Jun;12(5):453-7
3629396
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1873-8
11568697
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988 Mar-Apr;9(2):367-70
3128085
Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):368-74
11323459
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986 Sep 4;883(2):173-7
3091074
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan 15;25(2):218-23
10685487
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Nov 1;23(21):2272-5
9820905
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971 Jun;53(4):663-70
5580025
J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):842-8
10229405
Magn Reson Q. 1994 Sep;10(3):173-90
7811610