title: Protein domains and architectural innovation in plant-associated Proteobacteria.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Evolution of new complex biological behaviour tends to arise by novel combinations of existing building blocks. The functional and evolutionary building blocks of the proteome are protein domains, the function of a protein being dependent on its constituent domains. We clustered completely-sequenced proteomes of prokaryotes on the basis of their protein domain content, as defined by Pfam (release 16.0). This revealed that, although there was a correlation between phylogeny and domain content, other factors also have an influence. This observation motivated an investigation of the relationship between an organism's lifestyle and the complement of domains and domain architectures found within its proteome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We took a census of all protein domains and domain combinations (architectures) encoded in the completely-sequenced proteobacterial genomes. Nine protein domain families were identified that are found in phylogenetically disparate plant-associated bacteria but are absent from non-plant-associated bacteria. Most of these are known to play a role in the plant-associated lifestyle, but they also included domain of unknown function DUF1427, which is found in plant symbionts and pathogens of the alpha-, beta- and gamma-Proteobacteria, but not known in any other organism. Further, several domains were identified as being restricted to phytobacteria and Eukaryotes. One example is the RolB/RolC glucosidase family, which is found only in Agrobacterium species and in plants. We identified the 0.5% of Pfam protein domain families that were most significantly over-represented in the plant-associated Proteobacteria with respect to the background frequencies in the whole set of available proteobacterial proteomes. These included guanylate cyclase, domains implicated in aromatic catabolism, cellulase and several domains of unknown function. We identified 459 unique domain architectures found in phylogenetically diverse plant pathogens and symbionts that were absent from non-pathogenic and non-symbiotic relatives. The vast majority of these were restricted to a single species or several closely related species and so their distributions could be better explained by phylogeny than by lifestyle. However, several architectures were found in two or more very distantly related phytobacteria but absent from non-plant-associated bacteria. Many of the proteins with these unique architectures are predicted to be secreted. In Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato, those genes encoding genes with novel domain architectures tended to have atypical GC contents and were adjacent to insertion sequence elements and phage-like sequences, suggesting acquisition by horizontal transfer.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  By identifying domains and architectures unique to plant pathogens and symbionts, we highlighted candidate proteins for involvement in plant-associated bacterial lifestyles. Given that characterisation of novel gene products in vivo and in vitro is time-consuming and expensive, this computational approach may be useful for reducing experimental search space. Furthermore we discuss the biological significance of novel proteins highlighted by this study in the context of plant-associated lifestyles.
authors.affiliation: The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich, NR4 7UH, UK. david.studholme@sainsbury-laboratory.ac.uk
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Studholme
authors.forename: J Allan
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Downie
authors.forename: Gail M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Preston
mesh_terms: D016000:Cluster Analysis; D019295:Computational Biology; D016680:Genome, Bacterial; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D016366:Open Reading Frames; D010802:Phylogeny; D010944:Plants / Q000382:microbiology*; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary; D020560:Proteobacteria / Q000378:metabolism*; D040901:Proteomics; D044224:Pseudomonas syringae / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D012984:Software
references.citation: Protein Eng. 1999 Jan;12(1):3-9
references.pmid: 10065704
references.citation: Science. 1999 Jul 16;285(5426):406-9
references.pmid: 10411503
references.citation: Science. 2000 Mar 10;287(5459):1809-15
references.pmid: 10710307
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Mar 30;404(6777):502-6
references.pmid: 10761919
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):151-9
references.pmid: 10910347
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Aug 31;406(6799):959-64
references.pmid: 10984043
references.citation: Science. 2000 Oct 13;290(5490):347-50
references.pmid: 11030655
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Dec;13(12):1322-9
references.pmid: 11106024
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2000 Nov;38(4):828-38
references.pmid: 11115117
references.citation: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001 Jan;51(Pt 1):89-103
references.pmid: 11211278
references.citation: DNA Res. 2000 Dec 31;7(6):331-8
references.pmid: 11214968
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Mar 27;98(7):4136-41
references.pmid: 11259647
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Apr;17(4):383-4
references.pmid: 11301314
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):668-72
references.pmid: 11474104
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Aug 14;98(17):9877-82
references.pmid: 11481430
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Sep 11;203(1):11-21
references.pmid: 11557134
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2093-8
references.pmid: 11557893
references.citation: Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2317-23
references.pmid: 11743193
references.citation: Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2323-8
references.pmid: 11743194
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2002 Feb;184(3):831-9
references.pmid: 11790754
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 31;415(6871):497-502
references.pmid: 11823852
references.citation: Nature. 2002 May 9;417(6885):202-5
references.pmid: 12000965
references.citation: Nature. 2002 May 23;417(6887):459-63
references.pmid: 12024217
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2003 Feb;185(3):1018-26
references.pmid: 12533478
references.citation: DNA Res. 2002 Dec 31;9(6):189-97
references.pmid: 12597275
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4;100(5):2807-12
references.pmid: 12604773
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2003 May;185(9):2759-73
references.pmid: 12700255
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2003 Sep;35(1):32-40
references.pmid: 12910271
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 2;100(18):10181-6
references.pmid: 12928499
references.citation: Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2003 Sep;16(9):743-51
references.pmid: 12971597
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D115-9
references.pmid: 14681372
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D138-41
references.pmid: 14681378
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D142-4
references.pmid: 14681379
references.citation: Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;7(2):185-91
references.pmid: 15063857
references.citation: Genes Dev. 2004 Mar 15;18(6):715-27
references.pmid: 15075296
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2004 May 14;338(5):1027-36
references.pmid: 15111065
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 27;101(30):11105-10
references.pmid: 15263089
references.citation: Genes Dev. 1989 Nov;3(11):1745-57
references.pmid: 2606345
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
references.pmid: 2231712
references.citation: EMBO J. 1991 Oct;10(10):2889-95
references.pmid: 1915268
references.citation: EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3125-8
references.pmid: 1915286
references.citation: Trends Biochem Sci. 1997 Sep;22(9):331-3
references.pmid: 9301332
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1998 Jun;28(6):1381-9
references.pmid: 9680225
references.citation: Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol. 1998;6:175-82
references.pmid: 9783223
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Nov 12;396(6707):133-40
references.pmid: 9823893