Medetomidine with ketamine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in buffaloes.
The efficacy of ketamine and bupivacaine in enhancing the epidural analgesia induced by medetomidine was evaluated in 10 buffalo calves utilized repeatedly after a gap of 10 days so that each drug combination was tested in 4 randomly selected animals. In group A, medetomidine (15 microg/kg), in group B ketamine (2.0 mg/kg), in group C bupivacaine (0.125 mg/kg), in group D medetomidine and ketamine (15 microg/kg and 2.0 mg/kg), and in group E medetomidine and bupivacaine (15 microg/kg and 0.125 mg/kg) was administered epidurally. Onset of analgesia was significantly earlier in animals of groups B and D compared to the animals of groups A, C and E. Medetomidine alone or in combination with ketamine/bupivacaine produced complete analgesia of the tail, perineum, inguinal region and upper parts of hind limbs. Ketamine produced a very short duration of complete analgesia at the tail and perineum. Bupivacaine alone produced only mild to moderate analgesia. Both ketamine and bupivacaine prolonged the duration of analgesia. Motor incoordination was mild to moderate in animals of all the groups, but animals remained standing throughout the period of observation. Animals of groups A, D and E showed mild to moderate sedation during the observation period. Ruminal movements decreased nonsignificantly in animals of groups A and E. Mild salivation was observed in animals of all the groups except group C. Significant decrease in heart rate (HR) was recorded after epidural administration of medetomidine or bupivacaine; however, ketamine caused short duration of tachycardia. The administration of ketamine with medetomidine caused lesser decrease in HR compared to medetomidine alone or in combination with bupivacaine. Significant fall in respiratory rate (RR) was recorded after epidural administration of medetomidine or bupivacaine alone, but an increase in RR was recorded after ketamine administration. The fall in RR was less pronounced in animals in which medetomidine was used with ketamine compared to the animals in which medetomidine was used alone or in combination with bupivacaine. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased and central venous pressure (CVP) increased significantly after epidural administration of medetomidine in combination with ketamine or bupivacaine. The ECG changes included tall T wave, QS pattern, RS pattern and ST elevation and heart blocks at different intervals, which were more frequent and pronounced in animals given bupivacaine with medetomidine. It can be concluded that epidural administration of medetomidine can produce complete analgesia of the tail, perineum, inguinal region and upper hind limbs in buffaloes. However, significant depression of cardiovascular parameters was recorded. Administration of ketamine along with medetomidine resulted in significantly early onset and slightly longer duration of analgesia with lesser cardiopulmonary side-effects compared to medetomidine alone or medetomidine with bupivacaine. Addition of ketamine to medetomidine thus seems to be useful for producing epidural analgesia; however, addition of bupivacaine failed to provide any advantage over medetomidine alone.
Singh
V
V
Division of Surgery, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar (UP), 243 122, India.
Amarpal
Kinjavdekar
P
P
Aithal
H P
HP
Pratap
K
K
D000316:Adrenergic alpha-Agonists / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D015360:Analgesia, Epidural / Q000662:veterinary*; D000818:Animals; D002020:Buffaloes / Q000502:physiology; D002045:Bupivacaine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D007649:Ketamine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D008297:Male; D020926:Medetomidine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D013997:Time Factors
D000316:Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; D007649:Ketamine; D020926:Medetomidine; D002045:Bupivacaine
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Mar;10(1):1-10
2884329
Anesthesiology. 1968 Sep-Oct;29(5):931-43
5673151
Am J Vet Res. 1994 May;55(5):670-80
8067616
Vet Surg. 1998 Jul-Aug;27(4):384-91
9662784
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Nov 15;203(10):1441-4
8276706
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1977 Jan 15;170(2):216-9
833047
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Apr;17(2):148-54
7913727
Eur J Pharmacol. 1976 Apr;36(2):313-20
6285
Vet Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;25(4):361-9
8810028
Eur J Pharmacol. 1984 Nov 27;106(3):477-88
6151509
Vet Rec. 1990 Dec 8;127(23):567-71
2288060
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1992 Oct 15;201(8):1187-90
1429156
Anesth Analg. 1993 Feb;76(2):295-301
8093828
Aust Vet J. 1995 Sep;72(9):354-5
8585853
Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Dec 6;158(1-2):119-27
2906007
Anesthesiology. 1992 Jun;76(6):948-52
1350889
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1982 Jun 15;180(12):1462-71
6124527
Anaesthesia. 1984 Oct;39(10):1023-8
6496899
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1988 Dec 1;193(11):1405-8
3209451
Anesth Analg. 1994 Jun;78(6):1164-72
8198277
Acta Vet Scand Suppl. 1989;85:29-37
2571275
Anesth Analg. 1992 May;74(5):712-8
1567040
J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med. 2002 Feb;49(1):3-8
11913823
Vet Surg. 1995 Jan-Feb;24(1):73-7
7701775
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Jun;16(2):199-206
8102182
Am J Vet Res. 1982 Aug;43(8):1343-8
7103218
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1986 Aug 1;189(3):315-6
3744994
Anesth Analg. 1998 Nov;87(5):1186-93
9806706
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1985 May;22(5):845-58
2861606
Am J Vet Res. 1998 Feb;59(2):162-7
9492930
Vet Surg. 1994 Mar-Apr;23(2):143-8
8191674
Am J Vet Res. 1999 Oct;60(10):1242-7
10791937