Parsing a cognitive task: a characterization of the mind's bottleneck.
Parsing a mental operation into components, characterizing the parallel or serial nature of this flow, and understanding what each process ultimately contributes to response time are fundamental questions in cognitive neuroscience. Here we show how a simple theoretical model leads to an extended set of predictions concerning the distribution of response time and its alteration by simultaneous performance of another task. The model provides a synthesis of psychological refractory period and random-walk models of response time. It merely assumes that a task consists of three consecutive stages-perception, decision based on noisy integration of evidence, and response-and that the perceptual and motor stages can operate simultaneously with stages of another task, while the central decision process constitutes a bottleneck. We designed a number-comparison task that provided a thorough test of the model by allowing independent variations in number notation, numerical distance, response complexity, and temporal asynchrony relative to an interfering probe task of tone discrimination. The results revealed a parsing of the comparison task in which each variable affects only one stage. Numerical distance affects the integration process, which is the only step that cannot proceed in parallel and has a major contribution to response time variability. The other stages, mapping the numeral to an internal quantity and executing the motor response, can be carried out in parallel with another task. Changing the duration of these processes has no significant effect on the variance.
Sigman
Mariano
M
Unité INSERM 562, Cognitive Neuroimaging Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA/DRM/DSV, Orsay cedex, France. sigman@shfj.cea.fr
Dehaene
Stanislas
S
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D008606:Mental Processes / Q000502:physiology*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Oct;86(4):1916-36
11600651
Psychol Sci. 2004 Jun;15(6):390-6
15147492
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Nov;13(11):1257-69
14576217
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;8(2):211-7
9635204
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):295-301
14966525
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):176-85
10195203
Vis Neurosci. 1996 Jan-Feb;13(1):87-100
8730992
Ergonomics. 1970 Jan;13(1):37-58
5416868
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 May;75(5):419-32
1692277
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Mar;8(1):73-80
11340869
Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
7972591
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):628-33
8570606
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Aug;9(4):487-93
10448157
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jan 1;5(1):10-16
11164731
Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jun;45(6):557-66
2740196
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1985 Oct;11(5):529-53
2932529
Curr Biol. 2000 Jun 1;10(11):R404-6
10837238
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Feb;77(2):1046-50
9065870
Neuron. 2002 Mar 14;33(6):959-72
11906701
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1968 Nov;21(2):183-92
5717928
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):4040-55
8985899
Psychol Bull. 1967 Mar;67(3):202-13
5341896
Neuroreport. 1993 Sep 10;4(11):1272-4
8219027
Nature. 2000 Mar 23;404(6776):390-4
10746726
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89
12417672
Nature. 1967 Sep 30;215(5109):1519-20
6052760
Neuron. 2004 Jan 8;41(1):165-73
14715143
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Jan;106(1-2):147-246
11256336
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Aug;26(4):1352-70
10946719
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8520-5
12829797
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2001 Nov;33(4):457-69
11816448
Science. 1996 Oct 18;274(5286):427-30
8832893
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Dec;19(6):1292-312
8294893
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1979 Sep;43(5):381-412
495175
Nature. 1995 Sep 7;377(6544):59-62
7659161
Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):238-55
3375400
Science. 1980 Aug 8;209(4457):704-6
7394529
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:629-51
11148320
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1111-21
14709230
Nature. 1996 Jun 20;381(6584):697-9
8649514
Ann Neurosci. 2010 Jul;17(3):136-41
25205891
Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1013-26
11697933
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Nov 15;15(8):1095-110
14709229
Psychol Bull. 1979 May;86(3):446-61
451109
Psychol Sci. 2001 Mar;12(2):101-8
11340917
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Nov;28(6):1187-99
12450341
J Exp Psychol. 1973 Nov;101(1):70-6
4759642
Neuron. 2004 Mar 25;41(6):983-93
15046729
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):624-52
11488380
Psychol Rev. 1960 Jan;67:1-15
13795057
J Neurosci. 1992 Dec;12(12):4745-65
1464765
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Aug;27(4):862-9
11518149
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1167-79
9842762
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Winter;8(1):47-68
23972235
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
11488378
Psychol Rev. 1999 Apr;106(2):261-300
10378014
Psychol Rev. 1997 Jan;104(1):3-65
9009880