title: "Intuitive" lie detection of children's deception by law enforcement officials and university students.
abstract: Adults' ability to detect children's deception was examined. Police officers, customs officers, and university students attempted to differentiate between children who lied or told the truth about a transgression. When children were simply questioned about the event (Experiment 1), the adult groups could not distinguish between lie-tellers and truth-tellers. However, participants were more accurate when the children had participated in moral reasoning tasks (Experiment 2) or promised to tell the truth (Experiment 3) before being interviewed. Additional exposure to the children did not affect accuracy (Experiment 4). Customs officers were more certain about their judgments than other groups, but no more accurate. Overall, adults have a limited ability to identify children's deception, regardless of their experience with lie detection.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 9aml1@qlink.queensu.ca
authors.forename: Amy-May
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Leach
authors.forename: Victoria
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Talwar
authors.forename: Kang
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Nicholas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Bala
authors.forename: R C L
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Lindsay
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003417:Criminal Psychology; D008192:Deception; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006076:Government; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D016495:Police; D011287:Prejudice; D013334:Students; D014743:Videotape Recording
references.citation: J Commun. 1980 Spring;30(2):121-8
references.pmid: 7381034
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1998 Feb;53(2):136-51
references.pmid: 9491744
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2002 Aug;26(4):395-415
references.pmid: 12182530
references.citation: J Commun. 1980 Spring;30(2):129-39
references.pmid: 7381035
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1974 May;29(5):703-9
references.pmid: 4833431
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1979 Oct;37(10):1713-22
references.pmid: 512835
references.citation: Am Psychol. 1991 Sep;46(9):913-20
references.pmid: 1958011
references.citation: Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):139
references.pmid: 10821259
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992 Dec;63(6):969-77
references.pmid: 1460563
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jun;72(6):1429-39
references.pmid: 9177024
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2000 Dec;24(6):643-58
references.pmid: 11105477
references.citation: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):948-58
references.pmid: 9204673
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1997;1(4):346-57
references.pmid: 15661668
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):403-39
references.pmid: 8316609
references.citation: Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Aug;26(8):849-84
references.pmid: 12363335