title: Single-blinded prospective randomized study comparing open versus needle technique for obtaining autologous cancellous bone from the iliac crest.
abstract: One of the most frequent complications of cervical anterior discectomy with fusion is pain at the donor site, usually the iliac crest. Despite the advent of new materials, autologous bone is still the "gold standard" for fusion procedures. A prospective, single blinded, randomized study was performed to evaluate the effect of a minimal invasive technique to obtain autologous bone from the iliac crest on pain. The minimal invasive technique uses a large needle to obtain cancellous bone. Consecutive patients scheduled for cervical anterior discectomy with a fusion using a cage were randomly assigned either to the classical open group or the needle group. Patients were unaware of the two possible options for obtaining autologous bone. They were asked to fill in visual analogue scores (VASs) at fixed moments during the first 6 weeks postoperatively. Three VASs were recorded: the score at the moment, the minimal score and the maximal score during the last 24 h. The wound at the iliac crest was measured 6 weeks postoperatively. Complications were registered. Fifty patients were enrolled. Twenty-five patients were assigned to each group . The pain scores from the needle group were significantly less than from the open group. At 2 weeks postoperatively, nearly all patients (88%) of the needle group were free of pain at the iliac crest, whereas ten patients (40%) of the open group still had some pain. Complications only occurred in the open group. Six patients complained of diminished sensibility. In two cases, it had resolved at 6 weeks postoperatively. In one case, a hemorrhage occurred. Surgical evacuation was not necessary. Obtaining autologous cancellous bone through a large needle for filling a cervical cage (even multiple cages) is safe and evidently less painful than through a classical open procedure. If pain exists it does not last very long. Generally, the pain is resolved within 2 weeks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Nymegen Medical Center, R. Postlaan 4, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. r.bartels@nch.umcn.nl
authors.forename: Ronald H M A
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Bartels
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001707:Biopsy, Needle; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D017586:Diskectomy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007085:Ilium / Q000637:transplantation; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000175:diagnosis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous
references.citation: Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1994;131(1-2):106-18
references.pmid: 7709771
references.citation: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1999 May;36(3):252-5
references.pmid: 10342614
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 15;28(2):134-9
references.pmid: 12544929
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Jan;(394):47-54
references.pmid: 11795751
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;95(1 Suppl):40-2
references.pmid: 11453429
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Sep 1;26(17):1850-7
references.pmid: 11568693
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Oct 1;26(19):E432-6
references.pmid: 11698902
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar;50(3):510-6; discussion 516-7
references.pmid: 11841718
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2001 Apr 15;10(4):E1
references.pmid: 16732625
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2003 Mar;98(2 Suppl):195-201
references.pmid: 12650405
references.citation: Neurosurg Focus. 2002 Dec 15;13(6):e1
references.pmid: 15766227
references.citation: J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2000 Feb;28(1):31-8
references.pmid: 10851671
references.citation: Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2000;34(6 Suppl):64-9
references.pmid: 11452858
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2003 Mar;98(2 Suppl):143-8
references.pmid: 12650398
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1997 Dec;10(6):523-6
references.pmid: 9438819