title: Seeing the light: illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees.
abstract: The principal challenge faced by any color vision system is to contend with the inherent ambiguity of stimulus information, which represents the interaction between multiple attributes of the world (e.g., object reflectance and illumination). How natural systems deal with this problem is not known, although traditional hypotheses are predicated on the idea that vision represents object reflectance accurately by discounting early in processing the conflating effects of illumination. Here, we test the merits of this general supposition by confronting bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) with a color discrimination task that can be solved only if information about the illuminant is not discounted but maintained in processing and thus available to higher-order learned behavior. We show that bees correctly use the intensity and chromaticity of illumination as a contextual cue to guide them to different target colors. In fact, we trained bees to choose opposite, rather than most similar, target colors after an illumination change. This performance cannot be explained with a simple color-constancy mechanism that discounts illumination. Further tests show that bees do not use a simple assessment of the overhead illumination, but that they assess the spectral relationships between a floral target and its background. These results demonstrate that bees can be color-constant without discounting the illuminant; that, in fact, they can use information about the illuminant itself as a salient source of information.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, United Kingdom. lotto@ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: R Beau
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Lotto
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chittka
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D003116:Color; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D008027:Light; D010775:Photic Stimulation
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):139-52
references.pmid: 9480680
references.citation: Sci Am. 1977 Dec;237(6):108-28
references.pmid: 929159
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12834-9
references.pmid: 11058148
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jul 1;13(5):547-55
references.pmid: 11506656
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jul 24;424(6947):388
references.pmid: 12879057
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1988 May;163(1):145-50
references.pmid: 3385666
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1989 Sep;146:39-62
references.pmid: 2689569
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Sep;186(9):885-96
references.pmid: 11085641
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Feb;190(2):105-14
references.pmid: 14652688
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(6):493-504
references.pmid: 12678647
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Feb 18;4(2):57-81
references.pmid: 15005648
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):23-40
references.pmid: 1573568
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):389-412
references.pmid: 7892735
references.citation: Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):405-8
references.pmid: 15087541
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2000 Dec;203(Pt 23):3521-30
references.pmid: 11060214
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Jul;204(Pt 14):2391-9
references.pmid: 11511654
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1988 Jan;8(1):156-9
references.pmid: 3339405
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1010-4
references.pmid: 10526341
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 May;11(5):1553-63
references.pmid: 8006721