title: Age-specific incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata in the Black Women's Health Study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Uterine leiomyomata represent a major public health problem for black women in the United States, but limited data are available on age-incidence curves in this high-risk population. We estimated overall and age-specific incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata in a large cohort of African-American women in the United States.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were derived from the Black Women's Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 59,000 black women from across the United States who were aged 21-69 years at baseline (ie, 1995). From March 1997 through March 2001, we followed up 22,895 premenopausal women with no prior diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma. Poisson regression was used to estimate overall and age-specific incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for self-reported uterine leiomyoma. In a subset of 248 patients who were selected randomly from the total case group, the self-reported diagnosis was verified in 96% of cases who released their medical records.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During 76,711 woman-years of follow-up, 2,637 incident cases of uterine leiomyomata reported as confirmed by pelvic examination (n = 358), ultrasonography (n = 2,006), or hysterectomy (n = 273) were observed. Incidence rates per 1,000 woman-years were 34.4 (95% CI 33.1-35.7) for all cases combined, 29.7 (95% CI 28.5-30.9) for cases confirmed by ultrasonography or hysterectomy, and 3.6 (95% CI 3.2-4.0) for cases confirmed by hysterectomy. The incidence rate peaked at ages 40-44 years for all cases combined (incidence rate 45.6, 95% CI 42.0-49.5) and for cases confirmed by ultrasonography or hysterectomy (incidence rate 39.8, 95% CI 36.5-43.4), and peaked at ages 45-49 years for cases confirmed by hysterectomy (incidence rate 8.3, 95% CI 6.4-10.7).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall incidence rates for self-reported uterine leiomyomata were consistent with other U.S studies in black women and confirmed a high burden of disease in this population. Age-specific incidence rates showed a later peak incidence than that observed among U.S. black women in previous studies.
authors.affiliation: Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA. lwise@slone.bu.edu
authors.forename: Lauren A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Wise
authors.forename: Julie R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Palmer
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.forename: Lynn
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rosenberg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001741:Black or African American / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000367:Age Factors; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D015994:Incidence; D007889:Leiomyoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000601:surgery; D008875:Middle Aged; D010808:Physical Examination; D017697:Premenopause; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D014594:Uterine Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000601:surgery; D014599:Uterus / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging
references.citation: Biometrics. 1983 Sep;39(3):665-74
references.pmid: 6652201
references.citation: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986 Aug 9;293(6543):359-62
references.pmid: 3730804
references.citation: Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(1):47-50
references.pmid: 2190879
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):229-34
references.pmid: 11814502
references.citation: Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;44(2):316-26
references.pmid: 11344995
references.citation: Lancet. 2001 Jan 27;357(9252):293-8
references.pmid: 11214143
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;188(1):100-7
references.pmid: 12548202
references.citation: JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1723-7
references.pmid: 12365955
references.citation: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):409-15
references.pmid: 11904599
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1993 Jan;83(1):106-8
references.pmid: 8417592
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;86(5):764-9
references.pmid: 7566845
references.citation: J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1995 Mar-Apr;50(2):56-8
references.pmid: 7722208
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;83(4):549-55
references.pmid: 8134065
references.citation: J Reprod Med. 1996 Jul;41(7):483-90
references.pmid: 8829060
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Dec;90(6):967-73
references.pmid: 9397113
references.citation: Vital Health Stat 23. 1997 May;(19):1-114
references.pmid: 9201902
references.citation: J Womens Health. 1997 Jun;6(3):309-16
references.pmid: 9201665