title: [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].
abstract: The changes of the periprosthetic bone density were examined with DEXA in 81 patients over a period of 1 year after implantation of cementless total hip endoprosthesis. Four types of endoprostheses (Vision 2000/Duraloc, ALPHA-Fit/ALPHA-Lock Plus, CLS/Allofit, Mayo/Trilogy) were implanted. Information on the changes of the periprosthetic bone density depending on the type of the prosthesis and the bony situation at the femur before operation was expected from these measurements. In all types of stems the strongest reduction of the bone density was found in the region of the calcar femoris, and the smallest changes were found distally and medially of the tip of the prostheses. In the prosthesis with shorter stem the change of the bone density was altogether clearly lower than in prostheses with longer stem. With increasing size of the prosthesis with proximally porous coating made from cobalt-chrome alloy, proximal atrophy was observed more frequently, whilst in the prosthesis made from titanium alloy with completely rough-blasted surface the distal hypertrophy increased. A low preoperative corticalis-bone marrow index strengthened the proximal atrophy in proximally porously coated prosthesis made from cobalt-chrome alloy and led in the prosthesis with completely rough-blasted surface more often to distal hypertrophy of the bone.
authors.affiliation: Orthopädische Klinik am Waldkrankenhaus "Rudolf-Elle" gGmbH, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Eisenberg. ajroth@gmx.de
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roth
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Richartz
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Sander
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sachse
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Fuhrmann
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.forename: R-A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Venbrocks
mesh_terms: D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation*; D001862:Bone Resorption / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology*; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979 Jun;(141):17-27
references.pmid: 477100
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jun;(339):121-31
references.pmid: 9186210
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Aug;(389):218-27
references.pmid: 11501814
references.citation: Orthopedics. 1998 Sep;21(9):1011-2
references.pmid: 9769048
references.citation: Clin Radiol. 1960 Jul;11:166-74
references.pmid: 14408427
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Jul;(352):66-74
references.pmid: 9678034
references.citation: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1999 Mar-Apr;137(2):114-21
references.pmid: 10408053
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 1999;10 (5):408-15
references.pmid: 10591839
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 1992 Sep;7(3):295-301
references.pmid: 1402946
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 May;(314):156-61
references.pmid: 7634629
references.citation: Orthopade. 1987 Jun;16(3):225-38
references.pmid: 3627795
references.citation: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1997 Nov-Dec;135(6):499-504
references.pmid: 9499515
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 1997 Jun;12 (4):365-72
references.pmid: 9195311
references.citation: J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003 Jun;11(1):48-52
references.pmid: 12810972
references.citation: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Sep-Oct;141(5):519-25
references.pmid: 14551837
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Oct;(355):182-8
references.pmid: 9917603
references.citation: Orthopade. 1995 Sep;24(5):378-86
references.pmid: 7478499
references.citation: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2002 Jan-Feb;140(1):42-7
references.pmid: 11898063
references.citation: J Orthop Res. 1996 Sep;14(5):762-8
references.pmid: 8893770
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):1009-20
references.pmid: 1522088
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Jul;(340):109-17
references.pmid: 9224246
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):79-96
references.pmid: 1729025
references.citation: J Arthroplasty. 1998 Jun;13(4):422-7
references.pmid: 9645523
references.citation: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 May-Jun;141(3):283-8
references.pmid: 12822075
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):124-34
references.pmid: 1728998
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998 Nov;80(11):1648-55
references.pmid: 9840634
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Feb;(371):146-53
references.pmid: 10693561
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jun;(231):7-28
references.pmid: 3370887
references.citation: Orthopade. 1997 Feb;26(2):181-9
references.pmid: 9157358
references.citation: Orthopade. 1995 Sep;24(5):387-93
references.pmid: 7478500
references.citation: Orthop Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;29(2):173-86
references.pmid: 9553563
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jan;(298):89-96
references.pmid: 8119001
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Jul;79(7):1007-12
references.pmid: 9234876
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):196-213
references.pmid: 2245546
references.citation: J Bone Miner Metab. 2003;21(4):229-33
references.pmid: 12811628
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;(121):20-32
references.pmid: 991504
references.citation: Calcif Tissue Int. 1998 Feb;62(2):177-82
references.pmid: 9437053