Regional variation of intracortical porosity in the midshaft of the human femur: age and sex differences.
This study investigated age and sex differences in patterns of porosity distribution in the midshaft of the human femur. Cross-sections were obtained from 168 individuals from a modern Australian population. The sample comprised 73 females and 95 males, aged between 20 and 97 years. Microradiographs were made of 100-microm sections and pore and bone areas were determined using image processing software. Initially the sample was divided by age: young (20-44 years), middle (45-64 years) and old (65+ years), but it was found that analysis on the basis of the ratio of medullary area to total subperiosteal area gave clearer results. The cortex was divided into three rings radially and into octants circumferentially and the porosity of each segment was calculated. Results showed that a pattern with raised porosity in the posterior and anterolateral regions, and with greater porosity in the inner parts of the cortex, becomes more pronounced with age. In males this pattern develops steadily; in females there are much greater differences between the middle and older groups than earlier in life. The patterns observed are consistent with progressive bone loss occurring along a neutral axis of the cortex where bending stress is lowest and the mechanical advantage of the bone is least.
Thomas
C David L
CD
University of Melbourne, School of Dental Science, Melbourne, Australia. cdthomas@unimelb.edu.au
Feik
Sophie A
SA
Clement
John G
JG
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology*; D001315:Australia; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D016062:Porosity; D011859:Radiography; D013314:Stress, Mechanical
Bone. 1998 Jan;22(1):79-84
9437517
Bone. 1999 Jan;24(1):57-64
9916785
Am J Hum Biol. 1989;1(2):175-183
28514006
Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):279-84
1421795
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Aug;75(8):1193-205
8354678
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983 Mar;60(3):359-81
6846510
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1978 Nov;49(4):545-6
216268
J Anat. 2003 Aug;203(2):243-55
12924824
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Apr;14(4):624-32
10234585
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Oct;12(10):1539-46
9333113
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1985 Sep;61(3):551-6
4019715
J Forensic Sci. 1969 Apr;14(2):205-12
4305670
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jan;14(1):111-9
9893072
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2000 Jun;112(2):191-205
10813702
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Mar;59(3):218-26
15031305
Osteoporos Int. 1992 Nov;2(6):285-9
1421796
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1984;10(3):179-222
6368124
J Orthop Res. 2003 Mar;21(2):312-9
12568964
N Engl J Med. 1986 Jun 26;314(26):1676-86
3520321
J Orthop Res. 1991 Mar;9(2):155-67
1992064
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Feb;52(2):103-6
8443684
J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Jul;16(7):1308-17
11450707
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Oct;12(10):1547-51
9333114
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1965 Jun;23(2):149-63
5826273
Bone. 1993;14 Suppl 1:S1-8
8110512
J Biomech. 1988;21(1):13-6
3339022
Age Ageing. 1992 Jul;21(4):286-93
1514458
Calcif Tissue Int. 1983 May;35(3):268-72
6871757
Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2003 May;272(1):434-45
12704701
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981 Aug;63-B(2):233-8
7217148
Bone. 1997 Nov;21(5):453-9
9356740
Med Eng Phys. 1994 Jan;16(1):75-81
8162270
Bone. 1999 Jul;25(1):143-7
10423041
Bone. 1998 Jun;22(6):683-90
9626409
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jun;(149):268-82
7408312
Calcif Tissue Int. 1979 Apr 17;27(2):105-8
110411
J Anat. 2000 Apr;196 ( Pt 3):463-71
10853968
J Orthop Res. 1988;6(6):886-96
3171769
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 Mar;52(3):199-204
8481832
Calcif Tissue Int. 1993 May;52(5):340-3
8504369
J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965 Jan;89:173-8
14263459
J Biomech. 1991;24 Suppl 1:19-29
1791177
Drugs Aging. 1998;12 Suppl 1:1-7
9673860
Bone. 1992;13 Suppl 2:S17-21
1627409
J Anat. 1997 Oct;191 ( Pt 3):407-16
9418997