title: Are there capacity limitations in symmetry perception?
abstract: Previous researchers have proposed that there are two types of symmetry detection: one based on crude preattentive symmetry judgments and another based on detailed scrutiny of individual parts (Barlow & Reeves, 1979; S. E. Palmer & Hemenway, 1978; Royer, 1981). Four experiments were conducted to examine capacity limits in different symmetry judgments. Observers were required to discriminate between random patterns and approximate symmetry (Experiments 1 and 3) or between perfect and approximate symmetry (Experiments 2 and 4). The patterns were divided into two sets of dots, presented either simultaneously or successively. A comparison of accuracy under these two presentation conditions suggested that symmetry detection involves an analysis that is spatially parallel but coarse, regardless of either task difficulty or task type (detecting symmetry vs. detecting asymmetry).
authors.affiliation: University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
authors.forename: Liqiang
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Harold
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Pashler
authors.forename: Justin A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Junge
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: Vision Res. 1994 Jul;34(13):1703-21
references.pmid: 7941377
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Apr;9(2):258-69
references.pmid: 6221070
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1981 Dec;7(6):1186-210
references.pmid: 6458647
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A. 1990 Dec;7(12):2245-53
references.pmid: 2090803
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1978 Nov;4(4):691-702
references.pmid: 722256
references.citation: Vision Res. 1979;19(7):783-93
references.pmid: 483597
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1995;9(1):9-32
references.pmid: 7626549
references.citation: Perception. 1994;23(2):221-36
references.pmid: 7971101
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(19):2621-44
references.pmid: 10958913
references.citation: Nature. 1996 Sep 26;383(6598):334-7
references.pmid: 8848045
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1972 Apr;93(1):72-82
references.pmid: 5013342
references.citation: Perception. 1997;26(7):891-904
references.pmid: 9509141
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Apr;62(3):425-51
references.pmid: 10909235
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Oct;60(7):1101-16
references.pmid: 9821773
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):429-56
references.pmid: 8759043
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references.pmid: 7351125
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):150-63
references.pmid: 2137516
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Aug;24(4):1296-310
references.pmid: 9706716
references.citation: Vision Res. 1998 Dec;38(23):3795-803
references.pmid: 9893808
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1969 Feb;79(2):1-16
references.pmid: 5779623
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1982 Aug;32(2):171-7
references.pmid: 7145587
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 1999 Sep-Oct;16(5):919-22
references.pmid: 10580727
references.citation: Vision Res. 1997 Oct;37(20):2915-30
references.pmid: 9415370
references.citation: Perception. 1993;22(5):565-87
references.pmid: 8414882
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):791-804
references.pmid: 12467584