title: Comparative evaluation of image quality from three CT simulation scanners.
abstract: Today, radiation therapy (RT) is moving toward increased radiation dose to the tumor as a result of 3D conformal RT (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), which have been made possible by advances in volumetric-based image planning with digital imaging systems such as computed tomography (CT). Treatment planning for such RT requires superior CT image quality. Our goal in this study was to evaluate and to compare the image quality of three unique CT simulation scanners available at our center for both single- and multiple-slice helical scanners. These scanners included a conventional 70-cm bore single-slice scanner (Philips Medical Systems), a large 85-cm bore single-slice scanner (Philips Medical Systems), and a 70-cm bore multislice scanner (GE Medical Systems). Image quality was evaluated in terms of image noise, low-contrast detectability (LCD), limiting spatial resolution (modulation transfer function), and slice thickness accuracy in accordance with guidelines set out by the AAPM. A commercially available Catphan phantom was used to characterize image quality for both axial and helical modes of scanning. We found that image quality was generally comparable for all scanners. Limiting spatial resolution and slice thickness accuracy were comparable for all three scanners for both scanning modes. The multislice unit was superior in terms of noise content, resulting in improved visualization of small, low-contrast objects, which is of significant clinical importance, particularly for soft tissue delineation. In addition, the multislice unit optimizes volume coverage speed and longitudinal resolution without compromising image quality, a significant advantage for the radiation oncology environment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. cmccann@uhnres.utoronto.ca
authors.forename: Claire
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: McCann
authors.forename: Hamideh
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Alasti
mesh_terms: D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods
references.citation: Med Phys. 1996 Feb;23(2):205-220
references.pmid: 8668101
references.citation: Med Phys. 1999 Nov;26(11):2223-30
references.pmid: 10587202
references.citation: Med Phys. 2003 Jun;30(6):1254-63
references.pmid: 12852551
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Mar-Apr;27(2):105-9
references.pmid: 12702997
references.citation: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Mar 15;52(4):1123-31
references.pmid: 11958910
references.citation: Med Phys. 1994 Mar;21(3):429-33
references.pmid: 8208218
references.citation: Med Phys. 2003 Jul;30(7):1683-93
references.pmid: 12906185
references.citation: Med Phys. 1999 Jan;26(1):5-18
references.pmid: 9949393