title: A meta-analysis of primate hand preferences, particularly for reaching.
abstract: P. F. MacNeilage, M. G. Studdert-Kennedy, and B. Lindblom (1987) proposed a progression for handedness in primates that was supposed to account for the evolution of a right bias in human handedness. To test this proposal, the authors performed meta-analyses on 62 studies that provided individual data (representing 31 species: 9 prosimians, 6 New World monkeys, 10 Old World monkeys, 2 lesser apes, and 4 greater apes), of the 118 studies of primate handedness published since 1987. Although evidence of a population-level left-handed bias for prosimians and Old World monkeys supports P. F. MacNeilage et al., the data from apes, New World monkeys, and individual species of prosimians and New World monkeys do not. Something other than primate handedness may have been the evolutionary precursor of the right bias in hand-use distribution among hominids.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
authors.forename: Eros
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Papademetriou
authors.forename: Ching-Fan
authors.initials: CF
authors.lastname: Sheu
authors.forename: George F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Michel
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002755:Choice Behavior; D007839:Functional Laterality; D018737:Hand Strength; D011323:Primates / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance