Primary care consultation predictors in men and women: a cohort study.
BACKGROUND
Women visit their doctors more than men, but comparatively few studies have explored gender differences in consultation in detail.


OBJECTIVE
To identify the factors that predicted the number of primary care consultations in men and women over a 5-year period.


METHODS
Prospective cohort study with three waves of data collection by postal questionnaire.


METHODS
A single suburban general practice in Greater Manchester, UK.


METHODS
Consultation data were sought from primary care records on a random sample of 800 adults. The main outcome measure was the number of consultations over the 5 years of the study. Questionnaire measures included the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire, the Illness Attitude Scales, a somatic symptom scale, a fatigue scale, and a functional assessment of disability.


RESULTS
Consultation data were obtained on 738 patients (445 women, 293 men, 92% of selected subjects). Longitudinal models of consultation over 5 years showed that changes in psychological distress were more strongly associated with consultation in women than in men, whereas cognitive factors (negative illness attitudes) were more strongly associated with the consultation rate in men than women.


CONCLUSIONS
The predictors of consultation in primary care may be different for men and women. A fuller understanding of the reasons for consultation may enable primary care doctors to better help individual patients, as well as perhaps contributing more generally to the development of gender specific interventions for those who consult unusually frequently.
Kapur
Navneet
N
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester. nav.kapur@man.ac.uk
Hunt
Isabelle
I
Lunt
Mark
M
McBeth
John
J
Creed
Francis
F
Macfarlane
Gary
G
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004739:England; D005194:Family Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011320:Primary Health Care; D012737:Sex Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(5):507-13
3672148
J Psychosom Res. 1987;31(2):191-202
3585821
J Psychosom Res. 1990;34(5):525-34
2231486
J Public Health Med. 1992 Jun;14(2):131-7
1515196
J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53
8463991
Psychol Med. 1995 Jan;25(1):33-41
7792360
BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1008-12
8616346
Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):75-83
8671107
J Psychosom Res. 1996 Jan;40(1):95-104
8730649
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(2):231-46
9225411
Fam Pract. 1998 Apr;15(2):119-25
9613478
Fam Pract. 1998 Jun;15(3):198-204
9694175
J Rheumatol. 1999 Feb;26(2):413-9
9972978
Br J Gen Pract. 1998 Dec;48(437):1824-7
10198500
Psychol Med. 1999 Nov;29(6):1347-57
10616940
Fam Pract. 2000 Aug;17(4):298-304
10934176
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Sep;50(458):716-23
11050788
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;58(2):181-7
11177120
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Dec;51(473):987-94
11766871
Psychosom Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):668-75
12140357
J Affect Disord. 2002 Sep;71(1-3):1-9
12167495
Psychol Med. 2004 May;34(4):719-28
15099425
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Apr;54(501):248-53
15113490
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Apr;54(501):279-81
15113495
Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(16):1107-23
6623118
Am J Psychiatry. 1985 Oct;142(10):1146-9
4037124
Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(3):289-92
3961543
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Jan;175(1):20-5
3806067
J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Sep;30(3):282-304
2778300