Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty.
Hip resurfacing is being performed more frequently in the United Kingdom. The possible benefits include more accurate restoration of leg length, femoral offset and femoral anteversion than occurs after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared anteroposterior radiographs from 26 patients who had undergone hybrid THA (uncemented cup/cemented stem), with 28 who had undergone Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty (BHR). We measured the femoral offset, femoral length, acetabular offset and acetabular height with reference to the normal contralateral hip. The data were analysed by paired t-tests. There was a significant reduction in femoral offset (p = 0.0004) and increase in length (p = 0.001) in the BHR group. In the THA group, there was a significant reduction in acetabular offset (p = 0.0003), but femoral offset and overall hip length were restored accurately. We conclude that hip resurfacing does not restore hip mechanics as accurately as THA.
Loughead
J M
JM
Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, England. jonathan@loughead.fsworld.co.uk
Chesney
D
D
Holland
J P
JP
McCaskie
A W
AW
D000077:Acetabulum; D000328:Adult; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005269:Femur; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000503:physiopathology; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D015203:Reproducibility of Results