title: Structural models of psychopathy.
abstract: Psychopathy traditionally is defined by a cluster of inferred personality traits and socially deviant behaviors. The accepted standard for the reliable and valid assessment of psychopathy is the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Because of its importance in basic and applied research, and in the mental health and criminal justice systems, the PCL-R has been subjected to intense scrutiny by researchers and clinicians. In this article we discuss issues surrounding its structural properties and those of its derivatives. Using factor analysis, item response theory, and multidimensional scaling, we propose that the PCL-R and its derivatives are underpinned by at least four correlated factors: Interpersonal, Affective, Lifestyle, and Antisocial. We argue that attempts to characterize antisocial behaviors as merely "downstream" manifestations of more central traits are inconsistent with the structural properties of the PCL-R and with evidence that the development of traits and actions are interactive and reciprocal. We also report new evidence that psychopathy and its factors are dimensional in nature, perhaps extreme variants of normal personality traits and behaviors.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada. rhare@interchange.ubc.ca
authors.forename: Robert D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Hare
authors.forename: Craig S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Neumann
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D000987:Antisocial Personality Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology*; D003415:Crime; D006801:Humans; D008019:Life Style; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011594:Psychometrics
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2000 Feb;24(1):83-100
references.pmid: 10693320
references.citation: J Pers Assess. 2002 Feb;78(1):87-103
references.pmid: 11936214
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Jun;73(3):466-76
references.pmid: 15982144
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2001 Dec;13(4):531-42
references.pmid: 11793896
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Apr;62(2):387-97
references.pmid: 8201078
references.citation: J Pers Disord. 2005 Dec;19(6):624-40
references.pmid: 16553559
references.citation: Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2001 Apr;3(2):158-62
references.pmid: 11276412
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Oct;15(10):699-704
references.pmid: 15447642
references.citation: Eur Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;16(1):49-56
references.pmid: 11246292
references.citation: J Pers Disord. 2004 Aug;18(4):337-57
references.pmid: 15342322
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Nov;113(4):626-35
references.pmid: 15535794
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Nov;107(4):566-75
references.pmid: 9830244
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2001 Jun;13(2):171-88
references.pmid: 11433793
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2004 Aug;113(3):416-27
references.pmid: 15311987
references.citation: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003 Dec;4(3):81-110
references.pmid: 26151870
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Jun;989:72-85; discussion 144-53
references.pmid: 12839887
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2004 Mar;16(1):90-5
references.pmid: 15023097
references.citation: Psychol Assess. 2004 Jun;16(2):155-68
references.pmid: 15222812
references.citation: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2003 Aug;31(4):457-70
references.pmid: 12831233