Unrelated helpers will not fully compensate for costs imposed on breeders when they pay to stay.
Unrelated subordinates may invest in costly help to avoid being evicted from groups (the 'pay-to-stay' hypothesis). However, the effectiveness of eviction to enforce help should depend on its being applied accurately and on the costs it imposes on both dominants and subordinates. The relative cost of being evicted is a function of the population frequency of eviction when population growth is limited by density-dependent factors. We describe a stage-structured pay-to-stay model incorporating density-dependent population growth, costly eviction and occasional errors. Breeders demand some amount of help and evict subordinates that do not provide it. Helpers decide on the amount of help they will provide. The threat of eviction alone is sufficient to enforce helping. However, helping will not be favoured if helpers do not impose costs on breeders. The amount of help provided is less than the cost that subordinates impose upon breeders, when any help is provided. Thus, the net fitness effect of a helper under pay-to-stay alone is negative, even if it is investing in cooperative behaviour. Constraints on dispersal have no effect on the amount of help, although they may influence the tolerance threshold of breeders and group stability, depending on the mechanism of density dependence.
Hamilton
Ian M
IM
Department of Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Zoology, University of Bern, Wohlenstrasse 50a, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland. ian.hamilton@esh.unibe.ch
Taborsky
Michael
M
D000818:Animals; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006126:Group Processes; D006608:Hierarchy, Social; D008954:Models, Biological; D009425:Nesting Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8092-9
7667250
J Theor Biol. 1996 May 7;180(1):27-37
8763356
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):265-70
12614575
Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1375-1382
9933533
Science. 2003 Oct 24;302(5645):634-6
14576431
Nature. 1992 Jul 9;358(6382):147-9
1614546
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 22;268(1481):2169-74
11600082
Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1079-1086
10877885
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 Mar;9(3):98-102
21236786
Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):209-16
7816134
Nature. 1999 Sep 23;401(6751):368-71
10517633
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2291-5
9881475
J Theor Biol. 2004 Apr 21;227(4):487-501
15038984
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2411-8
11133031
Am Nat. 2001 Feb;157(2):188-202
18707271
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):53-57
10234252
Am Nat. 2002 Oct;160(4):468-84
18707523
Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):72-5
11935015
J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
5875341