title: Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) intentional communication is not contingent upon food.
abstract: Studies of great apes have revealed that they use manual gestures and other signals to communicate about distal objects. There is also evidence that chimpanzees modify the types of communicative signals they use depending on the attentional state of a human communicative partner. The majority of previous studies have involved chimpanzees requesting food items from a human experimenter. Here, these same communicative behaviors are reported in chimpanzees requesting a tool from a human observer. In this study, captive chimpanzees were found to gesture, vocalize, and display more often when the experimenter had a tool than when she did not. It was also found that chimpanzees responded differentially based on the attentional state of a human experimenter, and when given the wrong tool persisted in their communicative efforts. Implications for the referential and intentional nature of chimpanzee communicative signaling are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Division of Psychobiology, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
authors.forename: Jamie L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Russell
authors.forename: Stephanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Braccini
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Buehler
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Kachin
authors.forename: Steven J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Schapiro
authors.forename: William D
authors.initials: WD
authors.lastname: Hopkins
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1996 Dec;110(4):346-53
references.pmid: 8956506
references.citation: Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):291-306
references.pmid: 15693773
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 1998 Sep;34(5):813-22
references.pmid: 9779730
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1996 Dec;110(4):336-45
references.pmid: 8956505
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1994 Dec;108(4):307-17
references.pmid: 7813191
references.citation: Child Dev. 1992 Oct;63(5):1186-97
references.pmid: 1446548
references.citation: Child Dev. 1979 Mar;50(1):33-40
references.pmid: 446215
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1997 Dec;111(4):330-6
references.pmid: 9419879
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):48-57
references.pmid: 15008672
references.citation: Am J Primatol. 2003 Jul;60(3):95-111
references.pmid: 12874841
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2001 Dec;115(4):337-43
references.pmid: 11824896
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 1999 Dec;113(4):417-25
references.pmid: 10608565