Intersexuality and the cricket frog decline: historic and geographic trends.
Exposure to anthropogenic endocrine disruptors has been listed as one of several potential causes of amphibian declines in recent years. We examined gonads of 814 cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) collected in Illinois and deposited in museum collections to elucidate relationships between the decline of this species in Illinois and the spatial and temporal distribution of individuals with intersex gonads. Compared with the preorganochlorine era studied (1852-1929), the percentage of intersex cricket frogs increased during the period of industrial growth and initial uses of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (1930-1945), was highest during the greatest manufacture and use of p,p-dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and PCBs (1946-1959), began declining with the increase in public concern and environmental regulations that reduced and then prevented sales of DDT in the United States (1960-1979), and continued to decline through the period of gradual reductions in environmental residues of organochlorine pesticides and PCBs in the midwestern United States (1980-2001). The proportion of intersex individuals among those frogs was highest in the heavily industrialized and urbanized northeastern portion of Illinois, intermediate in the intensively farmed central and northwestern areas, and lowest in the less intensively managed and ecologically more diverse southern part of the state. Records of deposits of cricket frog specimens into museum collections indicate a marked reduction in numbers from northeastern Illinois in recent decades. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that endocrine disruption contributed to the decline of cricket frogs in Illinois.
Reeder
Amy L
AL
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Ruiz
Marilyn O
MO
Pessier
Allan
A
Brown
Lauren E
LE
Levengood
Jeffrey M
JM
Phillips
Christopher A
CA
Wheeler
Matthew B
MB
Warner
Richard E
RE
Beasley
Val R
VR
D000818:Animals; D012734:Disorders of Sex Development / Q000266:history* / Q000662:veterinary*; D005260:Female; D005843:Geography; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D007087:Illinois; D008297:Male; D009144:Museums; D011157:Population Dynamics; D011898:Ranidae / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000506:poisoning*
D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical
J Wildl Dis. 2003 Jul;39(3):522-8
14567212
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Jul;104(7):712-22
8841756
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Dec;20(12):2736-43
11764156
Reprod Toxicol. 1993 May-Jun;7(3):237-48
8318755
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):568-75
12676617
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992 May;114(1):118-26
1585364
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1993 May;120(1):55-61
7685553
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5476-80
11960004
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Mar;22(3):627-35
12627652
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1998 Jan;109(1):94-105
9446727
Science. 1981 Aug 21;213(4510):922-4
7256288
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Aug;102(8):680-8
7895709
Environ Health Perspect. 1998 May;106(5):261-6
9647894
Chem Biol Interact. 1993 Dec;89(2-3):141-58
8269543
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jan 1;13(1):27-30
21238186
Carcinogenesis. 1992 Dec;13(12):2233-9
1335374
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 May;103 Suppl 4:19-25
7556019
Environ Health Perspect. 1994 Sep;102(9):780-1
9657710
Nature. 2000 Apr 13;404(6779):752-5
10783886
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1994 Oct;53(4):583-90
8000188
Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Oct;103 Suppl 7:157-64
8593864
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109(10):1063-70
11675272
Nature. 2001 Aug 2;412(6846):499-500
11484041
Environ Health Perspect. 2003 Apr;111(4):553-6
12676614
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Feb;22(2):396-405
12558173