We can do it: the interplay of construal orientation and social comparisons under threat.
The authors investigated how a collective self-construal orientation in combination with positive social comparisons "turns off" the negative effects of stereotype threat. Specifically, Experiment 1 demonstrated that stereotype threat led to increased accessibility of participants' collective self ("we"). Experiment 2 showed that this feeling of "we-ness" in the stereotype threat condition centered on the participants' stereotyped group membership and not on other important social groups (e.g., students). Experiment 3 indicated that in threat situations, when participants' collective self is accessible, positive social comparison information led to improved math test performance and less concern, whereas in nonthreat situations, when the collective self is less accessible, positive comparison information led to worse test performance and more concern. Our final experiment revealed that under stereotype threat, only those comparison targets who are competent in the relevant domain (math), rather than in domains unrelated to math (athletics), enhanced participants' math test performance.
Marx
David M
DM
Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. d.marx@ppsw.rug.nl
Stapel
Diederik A
DA
Muller
Dominique
D
D000339:Affect; D001290:Attitude; D004521:Educational Measurement; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D012919:Social Behavior; D013240:Stereotyping; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires