Spike-frequency adaptation separates transient communication signals from background oscillations.
Spike-frequency adaptation is a prominent feature of many neurons. However, little is known about its computational role in processing behaviorally relevant natural stimuli beyond filtering out slow changes in stimulus intensity. Here, we present a more complex example in which we demonstrate how spike-frequency adaptation plays a key role in separating transient signals from slower oscillatory signals. We recorded in vivo from very rapidly adapting electroreceptor afferents of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. The firing-frequency response of electroreceptors to fast communication stimuli ("small chirps") is strongly enhanced compared with the response to slower oscillations ("beats") arising from interactions of same-sex conspecifics. We are able to accurately predict the electroreceptor afferent response to chirps and beats, using a recently proposed general model for spike-frequency adaptation. The parameters of the model are determined for each neuron individually from the responses to step stimuli. We conclude that the dynamics of the rapid spike-frequency adaptation is sufficient to explain the data. Analysis of additional data from step responses demonstrates that spike-frequency adaptation acts subtractively rather than divisively as expected from depressing synapses. Therefore, the adaptation dynamics is linear and creates a high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 23 Hz that separates fast signals from slower changes in input. A similar critical frequency is seen in behavioral data on the probability of a fish emitting chirps as a function of beat frequency. These results demonstrate how spike-frequency adaptation in general can facilitate extraction of signals of different time scales, specifically high-frequency signals embedded in slower oscillations.
Benda
Jan
J
Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M5 Canada.
Longtin
André
A
Maler
Len
L
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D004555:Electric Fish; D004557:Electric Organ / Q000166:cytology*; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009435:Synaptic Transmission / Q000502:physiology
J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4267-85
10818163
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):6672-83
10964972
Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Aug 14;85(7):1576-9
10970558
J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Jul-Aug;186(7-8):645-60
11016781
Neural Comput. 2001 May;13(5):959-92
11359640
Neural Comput. 2001 Jun;13(6):1285-310
11387047
J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 15;21(14):5328-43
11438609
J Exp Biol. 2001 Jun;204(Pt 11):1909-23
11441033
Nature. 2001 Aug 23;412(6849):787-92
11518957
Biol Cybern. 2001 Oct;85(4):293-300
11592626
J Neurosci. 2002 Jan 15;22(2):584-91
11784806
Neuron. 2002 Apr 25;34(3):437-46
11988174
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Aug;88(2):761-70
12163528
Behav Brain Res. 2002 Sep 20;135(1-2):119-26
12356441
Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):909-19
12467594
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):66-70
12511955
J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;23(4):1506-16
12598639
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3279-93
12649312
J Neurophysiol. 1963 Jul;26:551-67
13951917
Neural Comput. 2003 Nov;15(11):2523-64
14577853
Neuron. 2004 Feb 5;41(3):455-64
14766183
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Apr;190(4):311-9
14767599
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Apr;7(4):380-8
14990932
J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 25;24(34):7435-44
15329390
Science. 1994 Feb 11;263(5148):823-6
17770837
J Neurocytol. 1989 Apr;18(2):265-83
2732763
J Comp Neurol. 1987 Aug 8;262(2):195-214
3624551
J Neurophysiol. 1965 Sep;28(5):784-99
5867879
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):2020-32
8890311
Science. 1997 Jan 10;275(5297):220-4
8985017
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):719-23
9012851
J Comp Physiol A. 1997 Nov;181(5):532-44
9373958
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;79(3):1549-66
9497431
Neural Comput. 1998 May 15;10(4):815-9
9573406
Neural Comput. 1998 May 15;10(4):821-35
9573407
Neural Comput. 1998 May 15;10(4):837-54
9573408