title: [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].
abstract: For women between 50 and 70 years of age, X-ray mammography presently represents the most effective method for early breast cancer detection. It is commonly accepted that quality assured mammography examinations conducted at regular intervals can reduce mortality from breast cancer. In the year 2002, the German Bundestag agreed to the implementation of a mammography screening program for Germany based on the European guidelines. The effectiveness of a mammography screening program is controversially discussed and two of the most commonly cited hazards are the occurrence of false-positive results and the so-called overdiagnosis. Another issue of criticism is the radiation risk due to the mammography examinations. However, in women aged 50-70 years the radiation risk has no substantial importance. In contrast to the present situation in Germany in which opportunistic screening is widespread, standardized quality assured screening will guarantee that false-positive rates are kept as low as possible and that further assessment diagnostics are effective and minimally invasive.
authors.affiliation: Fachbereich SG "Strahlenschutz und Gesundheit", Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Neuherberg. ENekolla@BfS.de
authors.forename: E A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Nekolla
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Griebel
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Brix
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000401:mortality*; D015984:Causality; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008327:Mammography / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 24;342(8):564-71
references.pmid: 10684916
references.citation: Radiat Res. 1994 May;138(2):209-23
references.pmid: 8183991
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 1997 May-Jun;47(3):134-49
references.pmid: 9152171
references.citation: BMJ. 1988 Oct 15;297(6654):943-8
references.pmid: 3142562
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 1990 May 15;45(5):889-95
references.pmid: 2335392
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1285-9
references.pmid: 2797101
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 1989 Jun;59(6):954-8
references.pmid: 2736233
references.citation: Lancet. 2001 Oct 20;358(9290):1340-2
references.pmid: 11684218
references.citation: Lancet. 2000 Jan 8;355(9198):129-34
references.pmid: 10675181
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 1995 Mar 16;60(6):777-80
references.pmid: 7896444
references.citation: JAMA. 1995 Aug 2;274(5):394-401
references.pmid: 7616635
references.citation: Radiat Res. 1999 Feb;151(2):218-24
references.pmid: 9952307
references.citation: Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):66-71
references.pmid: 7545954
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 1989 Jul 15;44(1):7-16
references.pmid: 2744900
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 19;326(12):781-5
references.pmid: 1538720
references.citation: Br J Cancer. 1995 Oct;72(4):1054-61
references.pmid: 7547222
references.citation: Am Fam Physician. 1999 Jan 1;59(1):99-104, 106
references.pmid: 9917577
references.citation: Nature. 1995 Dec 21-28;378(6559):789-92
references.pmid: 8524414
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Aug 19;84(16):1245-50
references.pmid: 1640483
references.citation: Radiologe. 2000 Feb;40(2):177-83
references.pmid: 10758633
references.citation: Radiat Res. 2003 Oct;160(4):381-407
references.pmid: 12968934
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jan;170(1):97-104
references.pmid: 9423608
references.citation: Radiat Res. 1996 Jun;145(6):694-707
references.pmid: 8643829
references.citation: Radiat Res. 1991 Feb;125(2):214-22
references.pmid: 1996380
references.citation: Radiologe. 1997 Aug;37(8):591-6
references.pmid: 9411474
references.citation: Cancer. 1989 Jan 1;63(1):181-7
references.pmid: 2910416
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1986 Sep;77(3):689-96
references.pmid: 3462410
references.citation: J Med Screen. 2000;7(4):195-8
references.pmid: 11202586
references.citation: Radiat Res. 1994 Feb;137(2 Suppl):S17-67
references.pmid: 8127952
references.citation: Lancet. 2002 Mar 16;359(9310):909-19
references.pmid: 11918907
references.citation: Radiat Res. 2002 Aug;158(2):220-35
references.pmid: 12105993
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jan 6;85(1):25-31
references.pmid: 8416252