title: Evaluation of an electronic general-practitioner-based syndromic surveillance system--Auckland, New Zealand, 2000-2001.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  During 2000 and 2001, Auckland Regional Public Health Service piloted a general-practitioner-based syndromic surveillance system (GPSURV).
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The pilot evaluated data capture, the method used to distinguish initial from follow-up visits, the definition of denominators, and the external validity of measured influenza-like illness trends.
  
  
  METHODS
  GPSURV monitored three acute infectious-disease syndromes: gastroenteritis, influenza-like illness, and skin and subcutaneous tissue infection. Standardized terms were used to describe the syndromes. Data were uploaded daily from clinics and transferred to a database via a secure network after one-way encryption of patient identifiers. Records were matched to allow the distinction of follow-ups from first visits, based on between-visit intervals of </=8 weeks. Denominator populations were based on counts of unique patients treated at participating clinics during the previous 2 years. Record completion was examined by using before-and-after surveys of self-assessed standardized-term recording. Between-visit intervals were counted for matching records and alternative denominators were calculated on the basis of different observation periods. Weekly influenza-like illness rates were compared with rates generated by an alternative system.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Physicians' self-reported recording compliance was highest for skin and subcutaneous tissue infection (71%) and lowest for influenza-like illness (48%). Initial visits had 18%-19% greater compliance than follow-up visits. The number of physicians reporting increasing compliance during the pilot was greater than the number reporting decreases for all conditions. Comparison of data with an independent influenza-like illness surveillance system indicated a close agreement between the two data series.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results indicate that incidence of acute syndromes can be monitored, at least as successfully as a manual system, by using standardized clinical-term data from selected general-practice clinics. The provision of feedback reports appears to have a limited but positive effect on data quality.
authors.affiliation: Auckland Regional Public Health Service, Private Bag 92 605 Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand. nickj@adhb.govt.nz
authors.forename: Nicholas F
authors.initials: NF
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Marshall
mesh_terms: D004196:Disease Outbreaks / Q000517:prevention & control; D005194:Family Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D009520:New Zealand; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011159:Population Surveillance / Q000379:methods*; D040442:Public Health Informatics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results