Human brain: reliability and reproducibility of pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging.
The Committee of Human Research of the University of California San Francisco approved this study, and all volunteers provided written informed consent. The goal of this study was to prospectively determine the global and regional reliability and reproducibility of noninvasive brain perfusion measurements obtained with different pulsed arterial spin-labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging methods and to determine the extent to which within-subject variability and random noise limit reliability and reproducibility. Thirteen healthy volunteers were examined twice within 2 hours. The pulsed ASL methods compared in this study differ mainly with regard to magnetization transfer and eddy current effects. There were two main results: (a) Pulsed ASL MR imaging consistently had high measurement reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients greater than 0.75) and reproducibility (coefficients of variation less than 8.5%), and (b) random noise rather than within-subject variability limited reliability and reproducibility. It was concluded that low signal-to-noise ratios substantially limit the reliability and reproducibility of perfusion measurements.
Jahng
Geon-Ho
GH
Department of Radiology, University of California San Francisco, 4150 Clement St, Rm 114M, San Francisco, CA 94121, USA.
Song
Enmin
E
Zhu
Xiao-Ping
XP
Matson
Gerald B
GB
Weiner
Michael W
MW
Schuff
Norbert
N
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013113:Spin Labels
D013113:Spin Labels
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Dec;40(6):800-5
9840822
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 Sep;22(9):1149-56
12218421
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Jan;35(1):70-9
8771024
Brain. 1996 Feb;119 ( Pt 1):101-10
8624674
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Sep;34(3):293-301
7500865
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Jul;34(1):65-73
7674900
Magn Reson Med. 1995 Mar;33(3):370-6
7760704
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1993 Nov-Dec;3(6):925-8
8280985
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991 Sep-Oct;1(5):561-7
1790381
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(4):518-22
8798035
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
18839484
Magn Reson Med. 1999 Jun;41(6):1246-54
10371458
Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15
10907753
Magn Reson Med. 2000 Sep;44(3):450-6
10975898
Acta Otolaryngol. 2000 Oct;120(8):967-72
11200593
Br J Radiol. 2001 Jun;74(882):552-5
11459735
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Oct;46(4):631-7
11590638
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Feb;15(2):203-9
11836778
Magn Reson Med. 2002 May;47(5):921-8
11979571
NMR Biomed. 1997 Jun-Aug;10(4-5):237-49
9430354
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Feb;49(2):307-14
12541251
Stroke. 1977 Jan-Feb;8(1):92-102
835162
Magn Reson Med. 1988 Nov;8(3):248-60
3205155
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jan 1;89(1):212-6
1729691