title: From evidence to action.
abstract: Despite the availability of vast quantities of evidence from basic biomedical and clinical studies, a gap often exists between the optimal practice suggested by the evidence and actual practice. For many clinical situations, however, evidence is unavailable, of poor quality or contradictory. Out of necessity, clinicians have become accustomed to relying on non-evidence-based tools to make decisions. Out of habit, they rely on these tools even when high-quality evidence becomes available. Growing out of an increasing awareness of this problem, the evidence-based medicine (EBM) movement sought to empower clinicians to find the evidence most relevant to a specific clinical question. Various organizations have used EBM techniques to develop systematic reviews and practice guidelines to aid physicians in making evidence-based decisions. A systematic review follows a process of asking a clinical question, finding the relevant evidence, critically appraising the evidence and formulating conclusions and recommendations. Results are mixed on whether educating physicians about evidence-based recommendations is sufficient to change physician behavior. Barriers to adopting evidence-based best practice remain, including physician skepticism, patient expectations, fear of legal action, and distorted reimbursement systems. Additionally, despite enormous research efforts there remains a lack of high-quality evidence to guide care for many clinical situations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA. ggronseth@kumc.edu
authors.forename: Gary S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Gronseth
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D009462:Neurology / Q000592:standards; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011364:Professional Practice / Q000592:standards; D012196:Review Literature as Topic
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 2000 Mar;110(3 Pt 1):335-41
references.pmid: 10718415
references.citation: Milbank Q. 1998;76(4):517-63, 509
references.pmid: 9879302
references.citation: Neurology. 2000 Jul 12;55(1):7-15
references.pmid: 10891896
references.citation: Neurology. 2001 Apr 10;56(7):830-6
references.pmid: 11294918
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001942
references.pmid: 11869613
references.citation: Neurology. 2002 Jul 9;59(1):13-22
references.pmid: 12105302
references.citation: Neurology. 2002 Oct 8;59(7):975-6
references.pmid: 12370450
references.citation: Laryngoscope. 1976 Aug;86(8):1111-22
references.pmid: 781439
references.citation: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Nov;97(5):481-6
references.pmid: 3120125
references.citation: J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Nov;108(11):940-3
references.pmid: 7829945
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov;11(11):664-72
references.pmid: 9120652
references.citation: J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov;11(11):705-6
references.pmid: 9120659
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88
references.pmid: 9561895
references.citation: Neurology. 1998 Sep;51(3):671-3
references.pmid: 9748008
references.citation: Circulation. 2000 Mar 14;101(10):1206-18
references.pmid: 10715270