Simulation studies of protein-induced bilayer deformations, and lipid-induced protein tilting, on a mesoscopic model for lipid bilayers with embedded proteins.
Biological membranes are complex and highly cooperative structures. To relate biomembrane structure to their biological function it is often necessary to consider simpler systems. Lipid bilayers composed of one or two lipid species, and with embedded proteins, provide a model system for biological membranes. Here we present a mesoscopic model for lipid bilayers with embedded proteins, which we have studied with the help of the dissipative particle dynamics simulation technique. Because hydrophobic matching is believed to be one of the main physical mechanisms regulating lipid-protein interactions in membranes, we considered proteins of different hydrophobic length (as well as different sizes). We studied the cooperative behavior of the lipid-protein system at mesoscopic time- and lengthscales. In particular, we correlated in a systematic way the protein-induced bilayer perturbation, and the lipid-induced protein tilt, with the hydrophobic mismatch (positive and negative) between the protein hydrophobic length and the pure lipid bilayer hydrophobic thickness. The protein-induced bilayer perturbation was quantified in terms of a coherence length, xi(P), of the lipid bilayer hydrophobic thickness profile around the protein. The dependence on temperature of xi(P), and the protein tilt-angle, were studied above the main-transition temperature of the pure system, i.e., in the fluid phase. We found that xi(P) depends on mismatch, i.e., the higher the mismatch is, the longer xi(P) becomes, at least for positive values of mismatch; a dependence on the protein size appears as well. In the case of large model proteins experiencing extreme mismatch conditions, in the region next to the so-called lipid annulus, there appears an undershooting (or overshooting) region where the bilayer hydrophobic thickness is locally lower (or higher) than in the unperturbed bilayer, depending on whether the protein hydrophobic length is longer (or shorter) than the pure lipid bilayer hydrophobic thickness. Proteins may tilt when embedded in a too-thin bilayer. Our simulation data suggest that, when the embedded protein has a small size, the main mechanism to compensate for a large hydrophobic mismatch is the tilt, whereas large proteins react to negative mismatch by causing an increase of the hydrophobic thickness of the nearby bilayer. Furthermore, for the case of small, peptidelike proteins, we found the same type of functional dependence of the protein tilt-angle on mismatch, as was recently detected by fluorescence spectroscopy measurements.
Venturoli
Maddalena
M
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Smit
Berend
B
Sperotto
Maria Maddalena
MM
D003198:Computer Simulation; D004134:Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine / Q000737:chemistry*; D057927:Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; D008051:Lipid Bilayers / Q000737:chemistry*; D008560:Membrane Fluidity; D008565:Membrane Proteins / Q000737:chemistry*; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D044367:Phase Transition; D011487:Protein Conformation; D013500:Surface Tension; D013696:Temperature
D008051:Lipid Bilayers; D008565:Membrane Proteins; D004134:Dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine
Biophys J. 2004 Sep;87(3):1445-55
15345527
Biophys J. 2004 Sep;87(3):1596-605
15345539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Feb;70(2):480-4
4346892
Nature. 1975 Sep 4;257(5521):28-32
1161000
Biochemistry. 1976 Sep 21;15(19):4145-51
183811
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1980;348:391-407
6249174
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Mar 6;641(2):416-21
6111345
FEBS Lett. 1982 Jul 19;144(1):145-8
6286354
J Biol Chem. 1983 Jan 10;258(1):31-4
6336750
Biophys J. 1984 Aug;46(2):141-53
6478029
Protein Eng. 1990 Dec;4(2):109-12
2075184
Biophys J. 1991 Feb;59(2):261-70
2009352
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1991 Jun 18;1065(2):203-12
1905573
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992 Dec 11;1113(3-4):391-425
1280467
Science. 1993 Sep 3;261(5126):1280-1
8362242
Cell. 1993 Nov 19;75(4):603-5
8242736
Biochemistry. 1995 Dec 5;34(48):15614-8
7495788
Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Nov;20(11):460-4
8578589
Biophys J. 1993 Nov;65(5):1795-809
8298013
EMBO J. 1994 Oct 17;13(20):4757-64
7525269
Chem Phys Lipids. 1994 Sep 6;73(1-2):139-58
8001179
Mol Membr Biol. 1995 Jan-Mar;12(1):157-62
7767377
Nature. 1995 Aug 24;376(6542):660-9
7651515
Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1348-9
8874009
Biophys J. 1996 Sep;71(3):1350-5
8874010
Biophys J. 1997 Mar;72(3):1247-57
9138570
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):131-3
9082985
Proteins. 1997 Apr;27(4):481-92
9141129
Nature. 1997 Jun 5;387(6633):569-72
9177342
Biophys J. 1997 Jul;73(1):3-20
9199766
Biophys J. 1997 Oct;73(4):1940-53
9336190
Biophys J. 1997 Nov;73(5):2251-9
9370422
Biophys J. 1997 Dec;73(6):3039-55
9414218
Biophys J. 1998 Apr;74(4):1966-83
9545056
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Jun 29;1376(1):91-145
9666088
Trends Cell Biol. 1998 Jan;8(1):11-5
9695801
Biophys J. 1998 Sep;75(3):1410-4
9726942
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Nov 10;1376(3):245-66
9804966
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Nov 10;1376(3):353-68
9804988
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Nov 10;1376(3):381-90
9804995
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998 Nov 10;1376(3):401-15
9805000
Biophys J. 1999 Feb;76(2):937-45
9929495
Biophys J. 1999 Apr;76(4):1929-38
10096891
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004 Nov 3;1666(1-2):205-26
15519316
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2003 Jun;67(6 Pt 1):060901
16241191
Nature. 1985 Dec 19-1986 Jan 1;318(6047):618-24
22439175
Eur J Biochem. 1993 Dec 1;218(2):385-96
8269927
EMBO J. 1995 Oct 2;14(19):4695-704
7588599
Biophys J. 1995 Oct;69(4):1230-45
8534794
FEBS Lett. 1999 Sep 24;458(3):271-7
10570923
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 Dec 15;1462(1-2):157-83
10590307
Mol Membr Biol. 2000 Jan-Mar;17(1):31-40
10824736
J Mol Biol. 2000 Sep 22;302(3):727-46
10986130
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Jan 15;1463(1):151-61
10631304
Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):481-6
11039922
Biochemistry. 2000 Oct 31;39(43):13106-14
11052662
Biophys J. 2000 Dec;79(6):3172-92
11106622
Biophys J. 2000 Dec;79(6):3201-16
11106624
Eur Biophys J. 2001;29(8):628-40
11288838
Biochemistry. 2001 Apr 24;40(16):5000-10
11305916
Biophys J. 2001 Aug;81(2):725-36
11463621
Proteins. 2001 Sep 1;44(4):435-47
11484221
J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Sep 5;123(35):8638-9
11525689
Biochemistry. 2001 Oct 16;40(41):12379-86
11591157
J Membr Biol. 2001 Nov 1;184(1):1-12
11687873
Structure. 2001 Nov;9(11):1083-93
11709172
Biophys J. 2002 Mar;82(3):1405-17
11867456
Biochemistry. 2002 Apr 16;41(15):4946-52
11939790
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 14;99(10):6731-6
11997475
Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):334-44
12080124
Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):345-58
12080125
Biochemistry. 2002 Jul 23;41(29):9197-207
12119034
Biophys J. 2002 Sep;83(3):1479-88
12202373
Biophys J. 2002 Dec;83(6):3324-35
12496100
Biophys J. 2003 Jan;84(1):379-85
12524291
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Apr 1;1611(1-2):5-15
12659940
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 May 2;1612(1):1-40
12729927
J Biol Chem. 2003 Jul 4;278(27):24586-93
12714595
Biophys J. 2003 Sep;85(3):1656-66
12944280
Biophys J. 2003 Oct;85(4):2430-41
14507706
Mol Membr Biol. 2003 Oct-Dec;20(4):271-84
14578043
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2003;42(47):5802-27
14673910
Expert Rev Mol Med. 2002 Dec;4(27):1-22
14987385
Biochemistry. 2004 Apr 20;43(15):4482-9
15078094
Biophys J. 2004 Jun;86(6):3709-21
15189867
FEBS Lett. 2004 Jun 18;568(1-3):15-8
15196912
Magn Reson Chem. 2004 Feb;42(2):162-71
14745796