The watercolor effect: quantitative evidence for luminance-dependent mechanisms of long-range color assimilation.
When a dark chromatic contour delineating a figure is flanked on the inside by a brighter chromatic contour, the brighter color will spread into the entire enclosed area. This is known as the watercolor effect (WCE). Here we quantified the effect of color spreading using both color-matching and hue-cancellation tasks. Over a wide range of stimulus chromaticities, there was a reliable shift in color appearance that closely followed the direction of the inducing contour. When the contours were equated in luminance, the WCE was still present, but weak. The magnitude of the color spreading increased with increases in luminance contrast between the two contours. Additionally, as the luminance contrast between the contours increased, the chromaticity of the induced color more closely resembled that of the inside contour. The results support the hypothesis that the WCE is mediated by luminance-dependent mechanisms of long-range color assimilation.
Devinck
Frédéric
F
Section of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 2400 Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. fddevinck@ucdavis.edu
Delahunt
Peter B
PB
Hardy
Joseph L
JL
Spillmann
Lothar
L
Werner
John S
JS
D000328:Adult; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D004215:Distance Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008029:Lighting; D008297:Male; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011601:Psychophysics
J Opt Soc Am. 1963 Jun;53:741-4
14035584
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1996 Apr;6(2):269-74
8725971
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
9176952
J Physiol. 1984 Dec;357:241-65
6512691
Vision Res. 2003 May;43(10):1159-75
12705956
Vision Res. 1995 May;35(10):1413-9
7645270
Vision Res. 2004 Apr;44(9):849-56
14992830
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 May;14(5):997-1006
9114510
Vision Res. 2002 Jan;42(2):211-26
11809474
J Opt Soc Am. 1972 Dec;62(12):1508-15
4643012
Vision Res. 1987;27(10):1835-44
3445473
Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):375-9
7892733
Vision Res. 1999 Apr;39(8):1531-50
10343819
Nat Neurosci. 2003 Aug;6(8):801-2
12872129
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jan 23;93(2):615-22
8570604
Vision Res. 2003 Jan;43(1):43-52
12505603
J Opt Soc Am. 1979 Aug;69(8):1183-6
490231
J Vis. 2004;4(2):57-81
15005648
Perception. 2002;31(2):233-46
11922135
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
9176953
J Opt Soc Am A. 1986 Oct;3(10):1743-51
3772637
Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1115-6
17737844
Perception. 2000;29(10):1169-84
11220209
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Nov;82(5):2719-30
10561440
Vision Res. 2002 Jul;42(16):1941-51
12160567
Trends Neurosci. 1996 Oct;19(10):428-34
8888520
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 1;20(17):6594-611
10964965
Vision Res. 1999 Dec;39(24):4098-112
10748942
J Opt Soc Am A. 1990 Jan;7(1):128-40
2299444
Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(20):2669-76
11520512