title: [Consensus on a process of benchmarking in primary care in Barcelona].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To define the strategy, the conceptual framework, the methodology and the indicators that are needed to promote and consolidate the culture of external reference (benchmarking) as a strategy for change in Primary Care teams (PCT).
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional, descriptive study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Primary care services of the Barcelona City Health Region.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two stages were distinguished. At the first stage, an adviser group was set up. This was divided into 4 focus groups in which the main lines, the conceptual framework, the sizes, the indicators and the methodology for comparing PCTs were agreed. The second stage, that of prioritization, was conducted by means of a questionnaire to opinion-formers. For each of the indicators proposed, they appraised the degree of agreement, the suitability and relevance of indicators, the capacity of PC to modify results and the practicality of the information for composing the indicators.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The involvement of professionals, their approach to improvement, and the transparency and dissemination of the evaluation were identified as strategic elements of benchmarking dynamics. In line with the basic principles of PC and the health system, 6 dimensions for evaluation were set: accessibility, effectiveness, capacity to resolve problems, longitudinality, cost-efficiency, and results. 43 of the 57 indicators prioritized gained the consensus of over 90% of the consultants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Evaluation as a useful tool for managing PC quality has to generate improvements or changes in PCTs. The involvement of professionals in the design and development of evaluation may help both its acceptance and the implementation of the changes arising from it. The indicators used and the effect of benchmarking policy on the results of PC service delivery require evaluation.
authors.affiliation: Consorcio Sanitario de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. aplaza@rsbcn.scs.es
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Plaza Tesías
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Guarga Rojas
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Farrés Quesada
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zara Yanhi
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D032921:Consensus; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013030:Spain
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1866-74
references.pmid: 10770149
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Aug 28;319(7209):528-30
references.pmid: 10463877
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1994 Mar 3;330(9):634-6
references.pmid: 8302346
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Mar 20;318(7186):803-4; author reply 804-5
references.pmid: 10215384
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 1998 Jan;21(1):47-54
references.pmid: 9557357
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 2000 May 31;25(9):653-60, 662
references.pmid: 10920524
references.citation: BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354-60
references.pmid: 9812935
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Apr;51(465):303-9
references.pmid: 11458485
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 1998 Oct 15;22(6):334-9
references.pmid: 9833347
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 2003;31(6):382-5
references.pmid: 12716574
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 8;334(6):394-8
references.pmid: 8538714
references.citation: Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1639-40
references.pmid: 10335781
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 2000 Nov 30;26(9):600-6
references.pmid: 11198338
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 1999 Nov 15;24(8):468-74
references.pmid: 10630029
references.citation: JAMA. 1997 Nov 19;278(19):1579-84
references.pmid: 9370503
references.citation: Aten Primaria. 2003 Feb 28;31(3):156-62
references.pmid: 12622982