title: Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. II. Continuous mechanical wounding resembling insect feeding is sufficient to elicit herbivory-related volatile emission.
abstract: Herbivore feeding elicits defense responses in infested plants, including the emission of volatile organic compounds that can serve as indirect defense signals. Until now, the contribution of plant tissue wounding during the feeding process in the elicitation of defense responses has not been clear. For example, in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), the composition of the volatiles induced by both the insect caterpillar Spodoptera littoralis and the snail Cepaea hortensis is very similar. Thus, a mechanical caterpillar, MecWorm, has been designed and used in this study, which very closely resembles the herbivore-caused tissue damage in terms of similar physical appearance and long-lasting wounding period on defined leaf areas. This mode of treatment was sufficient to induce the emission of a volatile organic compound blend qualitatively similar to that as known from real herbivore feeding, although there were significant quantitative differences for a number of compounds. Moreover, both the duration and the area that has been mechanically damaged contribute to the induction of the whole volatile response. Based on those two parameters, time and area, which can replace each other to some extent, a damage level can be defined. That damage level exhibits a close linear relationship with the accumulation of fatty acid-derived volatiles and monoterpenes, while other terpenoid volatiles and methyl salicylate respond in a nonlinear manner. The results strongly suggest that the impact of mechanical wounding on the induction of defense responses during herbivore feeding was until now underestimated. Controlled and reproducible mechanical damage that strongly resembles the insect's feeding process represents a valuable tool for analyzing the role of the various signals involved in the induction of plant defense reactions against herbivory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Bioorganic Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany.
authors.forename: Axel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mithöfer
authors.forename: Gerhard
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wanner
authors.forename: Wilhelm
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Boland
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D007814:Larva / Q000502:physiology; D027805:Phaseolus / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000502:physiology / Q000648:ultrastructure; D012908:Snails / Q000502:physiology; D018411:Spodoptera / Q000502:physiology*; D014835:Volatilization
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):369-77
references.pmid: 11154344
references.citation: Planta. 2001 Dec;214(2):171-9
references.pmid: 11800380
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:299-328
references.pmid: 12221978
references.citation: Plant Cell Physiol. 2000 Apr;41(4):391-8
references.pmid: 10845451
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8399-402
references.pmid: 11607325
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Oct;121(2):325-32
references.pmid: 10517823
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2004 Jul;6(4):387-401
references.pmid: 15248121
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2002 Nov;61(5):545-54
references.pmid: 12409021
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2004 Feb;30(2):255-71
references.pmid: 15112723
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jun 15;101(24):8993-7
references.pmid: 15184664
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Feb;7(2):61-7
references.pmid: 11832276
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):711-7
references.pmid: 11161028
references.citation: Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2001 Apr;46(4):165-74
references.pmid: 11304750
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1990 Feb;16(2):381-96
references.pmid: 24263497
references.citation: New Phytol. 2002 Nov;156(2):145-169
references.pmid: 33873279
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2000 May;12(5):707-20
references.pmid: 10810145
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1993 Mar;19(3):581-99
references.pmid: 24248958
references.citation: J Plant Growth Regul. 2000 Jun;19(2):195-216
references.pmid: 11038228
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1752-62
references.pmid: 15051862
references.citation: Science. 2001 Mar 16;291(5511):2141-4
references.pmid: 11251117
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2004 Nov;16(11):3132-47
references.pmid: 15494554
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Mar 14;92(6):2036-40
references.pmid: 11607516
references.citation: Physiol Plant. 2003 Mar;117(3):403-412
references.pmid: 12654041
references.citation: Science. 1990 Nov 30;250(4985):1251-3
references.pmid: 17829213
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1999 Sep;121(1):153-62
references.pmid: 10482670
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 1996 Jun;111(2):487-495
references.pmid: 12226304