In vitro validation of some flow assumptions for the prediction of the pressure distribution during obstructive sleep apnoea.
An adequate description of the pressure distribution exerted by the fluid flow on pharyngeal walls is a first requirement to enhance the understanding, modelling and, consequently, the prediction of airway collapse during obstructive sleep apnoea. From a fluid mechanical point of view, several flow assumptions can be formulated to reduce the governing flow equations. The relevance of some major flow assumptions and the accuracy of the resulting flow description with respect to obstructive sleep apnoea was investigated on a rigid geometrical replica of the pharynx. Special attention was given to the influence of geometrical asymmetry and to the position of the flow separation point. An in vitro experimental and theoretical study of steady pharyngeal fluid flow is presented for different constriction heights and upstream pressures. Pressure and velocity distributions along a rigid in vitro replica of the oro-pharyngeal cavity were compared with different flow predictions based on various assumptions. Fluid flow models were tested for volume flow rates ranging from 5 to 120 1 min(-1) and for minimum apertures between 1.45 and 3.00 mm. Two-dimensional flow models were required and predicted experimental results with an accuracy of 15%. Flow theories classically used in the case of a Starling resistor provided poor agreement.
Van Hirtum
A
A
Institut de la Communication Parlée, INPG-Université Stendhal, Grenoble, France. annemie@icp.inpg.fr
Pelorson
X
X
Lagrée
P Y
PY
D000399:Air Pressure; D006801:Humans; D008953:Models, Anatomic; D008954:Models, Biological; D010614:Pharynx / Q000503:physiopathology; D012212:Rheology; D020181:Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / Q000503:physiopathology*; D014059:Tongue / Q000503:physiopathology
Chest. 2002 Oct;122(4):1139-47
12377834
Sleep Med Rev. 2003 Feb;7(1):9-33
12586528
N Engl J Med. 1999 Mar 18;340(11):847-51
10080847
Eur Respir J. 1996 Sep;9(9):1801-9
8880094
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 29;328(17):1230-5
8464434
Sleep. 1996 Feb;19(2):156-77
8855039
Sleep Med Rev. 2003 Feb;7(1):3-7
12586527
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3354-62
14714815
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Mar;113(3):1658-75
12656399
Sleep Med Rev. 2003 Feb;7(1):61-80
12586531
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1378-84
10805822
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Sep;93(3):1084-92
12183506
J Appl Physiol. 1972 Jul;33(1):150-3
5037403
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2002 Jul;40(4):402-7
12227626
C R Biol. 2002 Apr;325(4):407-17
12161921
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001004
10796579
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jan 15;165(2):159-64
11790647
Hong Kong Med J. 2000 Jun;6(2):209-17
10895146
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 15;347(7):498-504
12181405
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Feb;84(2):486-91
9475857
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Nov;148(5):1385-400
8239180
J Biomech Eng. 1998 Jun;120(3):416-22
10412410
Eur Respir J. 1995 Dec;8(12 ):1993-5
8666091