A method for the rapid automated assessment of olfactory function.
We have developed a strategy for the rapid high-throughput screening of odor responsivity in genetically altered mice (in fact, any experimentally altered animal). Specifically, the report presents the development and validation of a fully automated procedure based on the evaluation of an animal's stimulus-induced reflexive breathing response (i.e. sniffing behavior) to both air and odorant stimuli. The method requires no training of the animal to be screened and the outcome of the evaluation yields an operationally defined measure. Briefly, using whole-body plethysmography, the procedure determines the numerical values for a set of 14 respiratory measures in response to the presentation of air and a well-above-threshold concentration of the odorant propanol. These measures of stimulus-induced sniffing are incorporated into a model that defines a single univariate measure of response behavior, or 'Sniffing Index', for each screened animal. The approach significantly discriminated between the reflexive sniffing response of a control group of mice and that of an experimentally defined manipulated group for which, a priori, we expected to observe a robust altered breathing response to odorant stimulation (i.e. non-odor-aversion-conditioned versus odor-aversion-conditioned C57BL/6J mice). Further, the procedure was able to significantly discriminate between a mutant phenotype with documented alterations in physiologic and behavioral function (namely, the OMP-null mutant), and their background strain. In addition, applying epidemiologic screening principles to the observed data, we established an operational procedure for the evaluation of unknown animals.
Youngentob
Steven L
SL
Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Institute for Human Performance, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210. USA. youngens@upstate.edu
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D051379:Mice; D008822:Mice, Transgenic; D016296:Mutagenesis; D009812:Odorants; D009831:Olfactory Mucosa / Q000502:physiology; D009833:Olfactory Pathways / Q000502:physiology*; D010812:Physical Stimulation; D010993:Plethysmography, Whole Body / Q000379:methods; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D012903:Smell / Q000502:physiology*
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Nov;3(11):1113-20
11036268
Neuron. 2000 Sep;27(3):487-97
11055432
Physiol Behav. 2001 Feb;72(3):379-85
11274681
Behav Neurosci. 2001 Jun;115(3):626-31
11439451
Chem Senses. 2001 Oct;26(8):953-63
11595672
Brain Res. 2002 Jun 21;941(1-2):62-71
12031548
Brain Res. 1988 Mar 15;444(1):95-103
3129142
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(3):310-5
2568654
Behav Genet. 1990 Jul;20(4):499-509
2175173
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3;93(18):9858-63
8790421
Neuron. 1996 Oct;17(4):681-93
8893025
Cell. 1996 Nov 15;87(4):675-86
8929536
Development. 1997 Apr;124(8):1611-21
9108377
Physiol Behav. 1997 Dec;62(6):1241-52
9383109
Neuroscience. 1998 Jun;84(3):849-66
9579789
Physiol Behav. 1998 Dec 1;65(3):513-6
9877418
Neuron. 1998 Dec;21(6):1273-82
9883721
Neuroreport. 1999 Jan 18;10(1):15-9
10094125
Lipids. 1999;34 Suppl:S239-43
10419165
Physiol Behav. 2002 Aug;76(4-5):661-7
12127006
Cell. 2003 Aug 8;114(3):311-22
12914696
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;90(6):3864-73
12917392
J Physiol. 2004 Jan 1;554(Pt 1):13-21
14678486
Behav Neurosci. 2004 Jun;118(3):636-42
15174942
J Psychol. 1966 Jul;63(2):291-7
5966310
Behav Genet. 1977 Mar;7(2):171-88
869857
Physiol Behav. 1980 May;24(5):957-63
7403298
Physiol Behav. 1980 May;24(5):965-70
7403299
J Gen Physiol. 1984 Feb;83(2):233-67
6609222
Physiol Behav. 1987;41(1):59-69
3685154