title: Influence of gap and overlap paradigms on saccade latencies and vergence eye movements in seven-year-old children.
abstract: The latency of eye movements is influenced by the fixation task; when the fixation stimulus is switched off before the target presentation (gap paradigm) the latency becomes short and express movements occur. In contrast, when the fixation stimulus remains on when the target appears (overlap paradigm), eye movement latency is longer. Several previous studies have shown increased rates of express saccades in children; however the presence of an express type of latency for vergence and combined movements in children has never been explored. The present study examines the effects of the gap and the overlap paradigms on horizontal saccades at far (150 cm) and at close (20 cm) viewing distances, on vergence along the median plane, and on saccades combined with convergence or divergence in 15 normal seven-year-old children. The results show that the gap paradigm produced shorter latency for all eye movements than the overlap paradigm, but the difference was only significant for saccades at close viewing distances, for divergence (pure and combined), and for saccades combined with vergence. The gap paradigm produced significantly higher rates of express latencies for saccades at close viewing distances, for divergence, and for saccades combined with divergence; in contrast, the frequencies of express latencies for saccades at far viewing distances and for convergence (pure or combined) were similar in the gap and the overlap paradigms. Interestingly, the rate of anticipatory latencies (<80 ms) was particularly high for divergence in the gap paradigm. Our collective findings suggest that the initiation of saccades at close viewing distances and of divergence is more reflexive, particularly in the gap paradigm. The finding of frequent anticipatory divergence that occurs at similar rates for seven-year-old children (this study) and for adults (Coubard et al., 2004, Exp Brain Res 154:368-381) indicates that predictive initiation of divergence is dominant.
authors.affiliation: Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de 1'Action, UMR 7125, CNRS-College de France 11, Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005, Paris, France. maria-pia.bucci@college-de-france.fr
authors.forename: Maria Pia
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Bucci
authors.forename: Nathalie
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Pouvreau
authors.forename: Qing
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Yang
authors.forename: Zoï
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Kapoula
mesh_terms: D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D001921:Brain / Q000254:growth & development; D002648:Child; D003290:Convergence, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology*; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000254:growth & development; D009801:Oculomotor Muscles / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012438:Saccades / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Brain Dev. 2000 May;22(3):173-80
references.pmid: 10814900
references.citation: J Autism Dev Disord. 1994 Aug;24(4):413-31
references.pmid: 7961328
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(4):439-49
references.pmid: 14730413
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):786-93
references.pmid: 11304075
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1993 Aug;70(2):576-89
references.pmid: 8410158
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am. 1967 Aug;57(8):1024-9
references.pmid: 6035296
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):661-74; discussion 674-721
references.pmid: 11301526
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1994 Sep;56(3):251-60
references.pmid: 7971125
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Dec;35(23-24):3335-58
references.pmid: 8560804
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;76(1):199-214
references.pmid: 8836219
references.citation: Cortex. 2000 Dec;36(5):715-31
references.pmid: 11195917
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Aug;121(4):391-400
references.pmid: 9746145
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3666-81
references.pmid: 8985865
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Nov 1;17(21):8566-79
references.pmid: 9334428
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2001 Mar;38(2):179-89
references.pmid: 11347863
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2004 Feb;154(3):368-81
references.pmid: 14557910
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Dec;35(23-24):3373-88
references.pmid: 8560806
references.citation: Brain Res. 1997 Apr 18;754(1-2):285-97
references.pmid: 9134986
references.citation: Brain Res. 1983 Jan 31;260(1):21-6
references.pmid: 6402272
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1984;57(1):191-5
references.pmid: 6519226
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Jan;10(3):317-22
references.pmid: 11167054
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 1995 May;37(5):557-67
references.pmid: 7755349
references.citation: Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1993 Feb;71(1):10-21
references.pmid: 8475702
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Feb;49(2):167-75
references.pmid: 2017353
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Nov;68(5):1624-41
references.pmid: 1479435
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Dec;19(6):1251-65
references.pmid: 8294890
references.citation: Strabismus. 2003 Jun;11(2):95-107
references.pmid: 12854017
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Apr;956:216-29
references.pmid: 11960806
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Sep;43(9):2939-49
references.pmid: 12202513