Reliability of automated blood pressure devices used by hypertensive patients.
Automated blood pressure (BP) devices are used by many hypertensive patients in Hong Kong, with or without medical advice. At two community clinics, we invited hypertensive patients aged between 40 and 70 years who used such a device to fill in a questionnaire and to have four sets of BP measurements, automated and mercury, at two visits. Of 290 hypertensive patients 120 fulfilled the criteria, and 73 of these agreed to participate. 53 devices measured arm BP, 21 measured forearm BP. The agreement between the mercury sphygmomanometer and the automated devices was poor, with average differences of 9.5 mmHg for systolic and 9.4 mmHg for diastolic and no clear advantage for either site of measurement. As a means of screening for BP >140/90 mmHg the sensitivity of the automated devices was 81% and the specificity was 80%. There were large variations in how often and under what circumstances the devices had been used. One-fifth of the devices had been acquired on medical advice but only 11% of the participants were aware of the three important conditions for operating such devices. Discussion of automated devices, their role and proper use, should now be part of routine hypertensive care.
Wong
William C W
WC
Department of Community and Family Medicine, 4th Floor, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong. cwwong@cuhk.edu.hk
Shiu
Ivan K L
IK
Hwong
Thomas M T
TM
Dickinson
James A
JA
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D001794:Blood Pressure; D001795:Blood Pressure Determination / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010353:Patient Education as Topic; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D019722:Sphygmomanometers / Q000592:standards*
Blood Press Monit. 1999 Dec;4(6):303-17
10602535
Blood Press Monit. 1999 Dec;4(6):343-51
10602538
BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1128-34
10775227
J Hypertens. 2000 Dec;18(12):1745-51
11132597
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):531-6
11230071
Am J Hypertens. 2001 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):1099-105
11724207
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Nov;10(11):1270-80
9397247
Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Nov 15;156(10):929-35
12419765
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 Mar-Apr;5(2):115-20
12671323
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Dec;17(12):807-9
14704723
Hypertension. 1995 Jul;26(1):60-9
7607734
J Hypertens. 1996 Mar;14(3):323-6
8723985
J Hypertens. 2002 Apr;20(4):629-38
11910297