title: The time course and specificity of perceptual deterioration.
abstract: Repeated within-day testing on a texture discrimination task leads to retinotopically specific decreases in performance. Although perceptual learning has been shown to be highly specific to the retinotopic location and characteristics of the trained stimulus, the specificity of perceptual deterioration has not been studied. We investigated the similarities between learning and deterioration by examining whether deterioration transfers to new distractor or target orientations or to the untrained eye. Participants performed a texture discrimination task in three one-hour sessions. We tested the specificity of deterioration in the final session by switching either the orientation of the background or the target elements by 90 degrees. We found that performance deteriorated steadily both within and across the first two sessions and was specific to the target but not the distractor orientation. In a separate experiment, we found that deterioration transferred to the untrained eye. Changes in performance were independent of reported sleepiness and awareness of stimulus changes, arguing against the possibility that perceptual deterioration is due to general fatigue. Rather, we hypothesize that perceptual deterioration may be caused by changes in the ability for attention to selectively enhance the responses of relatively low-level orientation-selective sensory neurons, possibly within the primary visual cortex. Further, the differences in specificity profiles between learning and deterioration suggest separate underlying mechanisms that occur within the same cortical area.
authors.affiliation: The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, SNL-B, 10010 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037-1099, USA. smednick@salk.edu
authors.forename: Sara C
authors.initials: SC
authors.lastname: Mednick
authors.forename: A Cyrus
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Arman
authors.forename: Geoffrey M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Boynton
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D014793:Visual Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jun 1;88(11):4966-70
references.pmid: 2052578
references.citation: Nature. 1993 Sep 16;365(6443):250-2
references.pmid: 8371779
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jul;5(7):677-81
references.pmid: 12032542
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1996;10(1):51-8
references.pmid: 8817771
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Oct;44(23):2737-44
references.pmid: 15358068
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2000 Apr 27;11(6):1285-8
references.pmid: 10817608
references.citation: Science. 1999 Dec 24;286(5449):2504-7
references.pmid: 10617465
references.citation: J Vis. 2002;2(2):190-203
references.pmid: 12678592
references.citation: Neuroreport. 1998 Nov 16;9(16):3571-5
references.pmid: 9858362
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 16;96(6):3314-9
references.pmid: 10077681
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Apr;2(4):364-9
references.pmid: 10204544
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Mar;10(1):42-54
references.pmid: 15053701
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1055-6
references.pmid: 15361880
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):790-3
references.pmid: 11845209
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):651-7
references.pmid: 15156149
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7425-7
references.pmid: 12810942
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jun 24;100(13):7942-6
references.pmid: 12771383
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7358-62
references.pmid: 8692998
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1990;28(6):573-84
references.pmid: 2118613
references.citation: J Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 May-Jun;21(3):134-43
references.pmid: 15375344
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Dec;3(12):1237-8
references.pmid: 11100141
references.citation: J Vis. 2004 Mar 17;4(3):169-82
references.pmid: 15086307
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Jun;43(13):1465-72
references.pmid: 12767314
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
references.pmid: 9176953
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Jun;35(12):1679-90
references.pmid: 7660576
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1998 Apr;6(4):347-9
references.pmid: 9593989
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1997 Jan;59(1):60-72
references.pmid: 9038408
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):697-8
references.pmid: 12819785
references.citation: Neurology. 1996 Aug;47(2):508-20
references.pmid: 8757029
references.citation: Mov Disord. 2001 Jan;16(1):94-9
references.pmid: 11215600
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1663-8
references.pmid: 9990081
references.citation: J Physiol. 1995 Mar 15;483 ( Pt 3):797-810
references.pmid: 7776259
references.citation: Brain. 2003 Oct;126(Pt 10):2175-82
references.pmid: 12821512
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(4):519-27
references.pmid: 7900292
references.citation: Nature. 1980 Sep 4;287(5777):43-4
references.pmid: 7412873