Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.
Diagnostic radiology does not have objective benchmarks for acceptable levels of missed diagnoses. Until now, data collection of radiological discrepancies has been very time consuming. The culture within the specialty did not encourage it. However, public concern about patient safety is increasing. There have been recent innovations in compiling radiological interpretive discrepancy rates which may facilitate radiological standard setting. However standard setting alone will not optimise radiologists' performance or patient safety. We must use these new techniques in radiological discrepancy detection to stimulate greater knowledge sharing, targeted instruction and teamworking among radiologists. Not all radiological discrepancies are errors. Radiological discrepancy programmes must not be abused as an instrument for discrediting individual radiologists. Discrepancy rates must not be distorted as a weapon in turf battles. Radiological errors may be due to many causes and are often multifactorial. A systems approach to radiological error is required. Meaningful analysis of radiological discrepancies and errors is challenging. Valid standard setting will take time. Meanwhile, we need to develop top-up training, mentoring and rehabilitation programmes.
FitzGerald
Richard
R
New Cross Hospital, Wednesfield Road, Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP, UK. richard.fitzgerald@rwh-tr.nhs.uk
D003142:Communication; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D010348:Patient Care Team; D011871:Radiology / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):517-9
11230064
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):1
15208098
BMJ. 2001 Nov 24;323(7323):1222-3
11719413
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Jun;180(6):1727-30
12760951
Clin Radiol. 2001 May;56(5):341-7
11384129
Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):140-6
15166319
Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):451-3
3336720
Am Surg. 2001 Dec;67(12 ):1175-7
11768824
Lancet. 2001 Feb 10;357(9254):463-7
11273083
Radiology. 2002 Jul;224(1):42-6
12091660
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Mar;1(3):212-7
17411562
Br J Radiol. 2000 Sep;73(873):999-1001
11064655
Eur Radiol. 2003 May;13(5):1095-9
12695833
Radiology. 2003 Nov;229(2):314-7
14595135
Hosp Med. 2000 Sep;61(9):637-42
11048605
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Sep;1(9):652-8
17411675
Eur Radiol. 2004 Nov;14(11):1980-9
15069578
Neurology. 1998 Sep;51(3 Suppl 3):S50-2
9744835
Br J Radiol. 2000 Oct;73(874):1052-5
11271897
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Aug;175(2):339-42
10915671
Clin Radiol. 2003 Dec;58(12 ):971-9
14654030
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Mar;182(3):585-6
14975950
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):785-8
10720368
Radiology. 1994 Jul;192(1):183-7
8208934
BMJ. 2002 Apr 6;324(7341):835-8
11934779
Eur Radiol. 2004 Jun;14 (6):1025-33
14872280
Radiology. 2002 Feb;222(2):297-300; discussion 301
11818589
Radiology. 2003 Jan;226(1):24-8
12511664
Hosp Med. 2000 May;61(5):326-9
10953738
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jul;175(1):17-22
10882240
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Apr;182(4):A9-10
15085869
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Jul;183(1):135-40
15208127
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):681-5
9294552
Clin Radiol. 1999 Mar;54(3):149-54; discussion 154-5
10201861
Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):109-12
9885595
Br J Radiol. 1997 Nov;70(839):1085-98
9536897
Clin Radiol. 2004 Jan;59(1):44-52
14697374
Clin Radiol. 2001 Dec;56(12):938-46
11795921
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70
10720363
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1448-9
15205270
BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1347-9
11387186
Clin Radiol. 2002 Nov;57(11):984-8
12409108
Clin Radiol. 2000 Aug;55(8):602-5
10964730
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):365-71
15128983
BMJ. 2004 Jul 10;329(7457):68
15242891
Clin Radiol. 2004 Jul;59(7):558-72
15208061
Radiology. 2000 Nov;217(2):516-20
11058654
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):737-40
10720354
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Dec;171(6):1571-6
9843290
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Apr;182(4):897-903
15039161
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Jan;1(1):59-65
17411521
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Jun;174(6):1511-8
10845472
Clin Radiol. 2002 Nov;57(11):982-3
12409107
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Aug;181(2):367-73
12876012