title: Optimal sampling of MRI slices for the assessment of knee cartilage volume for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  MRI slices of 1.5 mm thickness have been used in both cross sectional and longitudinal studies of osteoarthritis, but is difficult to apply to large studies as most techniques used in measuring knee cartilage volumes require substantial post-image processing. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal sampling of 1.5 mm thick slices of MRI scans to estimate knee cartilage volume in males and females for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 150 subjects had a sagittal T1-weighted fat-suppressed MRI scan of the right knee at a partition thickness of 1.5 mm to determine their cartilage volume. Fifty subjects had both baseline and 2-year follow up MRI scans. Lateral, medial tibial and patellar cartilage volumes were calculated with different samples from 1.5 mm thick slices by extracting one in two, one in three, and one in four to compare to cartilage volume and its rate of change. Agreement was assessed by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland & Altman plots.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared to the whole sample of 1.5 mm thick slices, measuring every second to fourth slice led to very little under or over estimation in cartilage volume and its annual change. At all sites and subgroups, measuring every second slice had less than 1% mean difference in cartilage volume and its annual rate of change with all ICCs > or = 0.98.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sampling alternate 1.5 mm thick MRI slices is sufficient for knee cartilage volume measurement in cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiological studies with little increase in measurement error. This approach will lead to a substantial decrease in post-scan processing time.
authors.affiliation: Menzies Research Institute, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. gzhai@utas.edu.au
authors.forename: Guangju
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Zhai
authors.forename: Changhai
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ding
authors.forename: Flavia
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Cicuttini
authors.forename: Graeme
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Jones
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000473:pathology*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000473:pathology*; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000175:diagnosis*; D018401:Sample Size
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002 Dec;10(12):914-21
references.pmid: 12464551
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002 Dec;10(12):922-8
references.pmid: 12464552
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002 Dec;10(12):929-37
references.pmid: 12464553
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Feb;42(2):258-62
references.pmid: 12595619
references.citation: Pediatr Res. 2003 Aug;54(2):230-6
references.pmid: 12736391
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(11):1317-23
references.pmid: 12810930
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jan;43(1):19-21
references.pmid: 12923282
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 May;7(3):265-71
references.pmid: 10329301
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2004 Dec;31(12):2444-8
references.pmid: 15570649
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2000 Jan;43(1):126-32
references.pmid: 10642739
references.citation: J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):466-77
references.pmid: 10864088
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Nov;43(11):2543-9
references.pmid: 11083279
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Oct;60(10):977-80
references.pmid: 11557657
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):2072-7
references.pmid: 11592369
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Apr;41 Supp 1:3-6
references.pmid: 12173279
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Aug;46(8):2065-72
references.pmid: 12209510
references.citation: J Rheumatol. 2002 Dec;29(12):2615-9
references.pmid: 12465162
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004 Feb;12(2):169-74
references.pmid: 14723876
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Mar;50(3):805-10
references.pmid: 15022322
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Mar;50(3):811-6
references.pmid: 15022323
references.citation: Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Jun;43(6):765-9
references.pmid: 15039496
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Oct;63(10):1255-9
references.pmid: 15361382
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Apr;36(2):121-9
references.pmid: 856064
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 1977 Oct;36(5):399-406
references.pmid: 200188
references.citation: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references.pmid: 2868172
references.citation: Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914-8
references.pmid: 3632732
references.citation: Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Oct;51(10):1105-6
references.pmid: 1444621
references.citation: Radiology. 1994 Aug;192(2):485-91
references.pmid: 8029420
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1994 Nov;67(803):1067-77
references.pmid: 7820398
references.citation: Radiology. 1996 Jan;198(1):209-12
references.pmid: 8539380
references.citation: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995 Sep;3 Suppl A:3-70
references.pmid: 8581752
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Mar;170(3):593-7
references.pmid: 9490936
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 May 15;318(7194):1299-300
references.pmid: 10323792