title: Threshold current of an insulated needle in the intrathecal space in pediatric patients.
abstract: A threshold current of <1 mA has been suggested to be sufficient to produce a motor response to electrical stimulation in the intrathecal space. We designed this study to determine the threshold current needed to elicit motor activity for an insulated needle in the intrathecal space. Twenty pediatric patients aged 7.3 +/- 3.9 yr scheduled for lumbar puncture were recruited. After sedation with propofol, patients were turned to the lateral position and an 18-gauge or 20-gauge introducer needle was placed at the L4-5 level through which an insulated 24-gauge Pajunck unipolar needle (with a Sprotte tip and stylet) was inserted. The needle was advanced into the intrathecal space as suggested by the presence of a "pop." At this point, a nerve stimulator was attached to the insulated needle and the current was gradually increased until motor activity was evident. The needle hub was checked for cerebrospinal fluid. If cerebrospinal fluid was not present, the needle was advanced further until cerebrospinal fluid was present. The threshold current was retested. The mean current in the intrathecal space required to elicit a motor response was 0.6 +/- 0.3 mA (range, 0.1-1 mA). In 19 patients, the twitches were observed at the L4-5 myotomes and 1 patient had twitches at L2. Twitches were observed unilaterally in 19 children and bilaterally in one child. This confirms the hypothesis that the threshold current in the intrathecal space is <1 mA and that it differs significantly from the threshold currents reported for electrical stimulation in the epidural space.
authors.affiliation: *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; and †Department of Pediatric Oncology, Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Ban C H
authors.initials: BCH
authors.lastname: Tsui
authors.forename: Alese M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.forename: Kirsten
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Cunningham
authors.forename: Shirley
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Perry
authors.forename: Sunil
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Desai
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Seal
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009339:Needles
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Seal R, Koller J, et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia via the caudal approach using nerve stimulation in pediatric patients undergoing fundoplication. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1152–5.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Wagner A, Cave D, Kearney R. Thoracic and lumbar epidurals via the caudal approach using electrical stimulation guidance in pediatric patients: a review of 289 patients. Anesthesiology 2004;100:683–9.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Gupta S, Finucane B. Confirmation of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth 1998;45:640–4.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Gupta S, Finucane B. Detection of subarachnoid and intravascular epidural catheter placement. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:7:675–8.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Gupta S, Finucane B. Detection of subdural placement of epidural catheter using nerve stimulation. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:471–3.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Guenther C, Emery D, Finucane B. Determination epidural catheter location using nerve stimulation with radiological confirmation. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2000;25:306–9.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Tarkkila P, Gupta S, Kearney R. Confirmation of caudal needle using nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology 1999;91:374–8.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Gupta S, Finucane B. Determination of epidural catheter placement using nerve stimulation in obstetric patients. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1999;24:17–23.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Wagner A, Cave D, Seal R. Threshold current for an insulated epidural needle in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg 2004;99:694–6.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Uwiera R, Emery D, Finucane B. Epidural needle insertion electrical guidance in a porcine model [abstract]. Anesthesiology 2002;96:A723.
references.citation: Kasai T, Yaegashi M, Tanaka. Spinal cord injury in a child caused by an accidental dural puncture with a single shot thoracic epidural needle. Anesth Analg 2002;96:65–7.
references.citation: Tsui BCH, Wagner A, Finucane B. The threshold current in the intrathecal space to elicit motor response is lower and does not overlap that in the epidural space: a porcine model. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:690–5.
references.citation: Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, et al. Ability of anesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 2000;55:1122–6.
references.citation: North RB: Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable pain. Adv Neurol 1993;63:289–301.
references.citation: LeRoy PL. Stimulation of spinal neuraxis by biocompatible electrical current in the human. Seminar on Spinal Cord Stimulation. Appl Neurophysiol 1981;44:187–93.
references.citation: Richardson RR, Nunez C, Siqueira EB. Histological reaction to percutaneous epidural neurostimulation: initial and long-term results. Med Prog Technol. 1979;6:179–84.
references.citation: Hoppenstein R. Electrical stimulation of the ventral and dorsal columns of the spinal cord for relief of chronic intractable pain: preliminary report. Surg Neurol 1975;4:187–94.
references.citation: Krainick JU, Thoden U, Riecheert T. Spinal cord stimulation in post-amputation pain. Surg Neurol 1975;4:167–70.