title: Attentional load modulates mislocalization of moving stimuli, but does not eliminate the error.
abstract: Localization of the onset and offset of a moving target is subject to a number of errors that have to be attributed to events following or preceding the target event. Apparently, observers are unable to ignore the spatiotemporal context surrounding the target event. In two experiments, observers' attention was directed toward a single position along a trajectory, two positions along a single trajectory, or two positions along two different trajectories. In the latter condition, attention to details of a single trajectory was reduced. At the same time, motion type was manipulated by varying the temporal interval between successive target presentations. The localization error was not affected by attentional load; however, effects of motion type were eliminated when two trajectories had to be attended to. It may be sufficient to notice that the target has moved for localization errors to occur, while specifics of the trajectory are ignored.
authors.affiliation: University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. dirk.kerzel@pse.unige.ch
authors.forename: Dirk
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kerzel
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Apr;13(2):259-68
references.pmid: 2952756
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Sep;2(3):322-38
references.pmid: 24203714
references.citation: Spat Vis. 2002;15(2):219-43
references.pmid: 11991576
references.citation: Cognition. 2002 Jan;82(3):B89-99
references.pmid: 11747866
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Feb;41(3):329-41
references.pmid: 11164448
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Jan;42(2):159-67
references.pmid: 11809470
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 May;60(4):683-95
references.pmid: 9628999
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Jul;22(4):1049-60
references.pmid: 8708601
references.citation: Vision Res. 1999 Nov;39(22):3702-9
references.pmid: 10746140
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Aug;145(3):340-50
references.pmid: 12136384
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 May;88(1):109-31
references.pmid: 12711155
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1999;62(1):20-35
references.pmid: 10356970
references.citation: Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(25):2623-35
references.pmid: 14552804
references.citation: Vision Res. 2000;40(27):3703-15
references.pmid: 11090663
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):439-53
references.pmid: 11700895