Clinical characteristics of elderly patients with a cautious gait of unknown origin.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate and systematically characterize a group of older adults with disturbed gait of unknown origin.


METHODS
Cross-sectional study.


METHODS
Outpatient clinic in a movement disorders unit.


METHODS
Twenty-five patients (mean age 78.4 years) with a disturbed gait of unknown origin were compared with twenty-eight age matched "healthy" controls (mean age 78.2).


METHODS
Detailed medical history, geriatric and neurological assessments.


RESULTS
Patients walked more slowly (P<0.0001) and with shorter strides (P<0.0001) compared with controls. Muscle strength was lower, and static and dynamic balance and gait performance were worse among the patients (P<0.0001). The patients also tended to be more depressed (P<0.0001),more anxious (P<0.002), had a greater fear of falling (P<0.0001) and had lower scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (P<0.005). There was no difference in the frequency of cerebellar or pyramidal signs in the two groups. However, neurological testing revealed that extrapyramidal (P<0.0001) and frontal release signs (P<0.0001) were more common among the patients. Neuroradiological findings were rare among the patients and they did not explain the changes in gait speed or fear of falling.


CONCLUSIONS
Older adults with a disturbed gait of unknown origin appear to share common characteristics. They walk more slowly than "healthy" controls with increased unsteadiness and with excessive fear of falling. The extrapyramidal, frontal lobe, and limbic systems apparently play an important role, to different degrees, in what can be viewed as a multisystem neurodegenerative syndrome clearly different from "aging."
Giladi
N
N
Dept. of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. ngiladi@tasmc.health.gov.il
Herman
T
T
Reider-Groswasser
I I
II
Gurevich
T
T
Hausdorff
J M
JM
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003710:Demography; D003952:Diagnostic Imaging / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D005684:Gait / Q000502:physiology*; D015577:Geriatric Assessment; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008609:Mental Status Schedule / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D009069:Movement Disorders / Q000209:etiology* / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012307:Risk Factors
Acta Neurol Scand. 2001 Aug;104(2):63-7
11493219
Arch Neurol. 2002 Nov;59(11):1778-83
12433266
Arch Neurol. 1995 Oct;52(10):970-4
7575224
Drugs Aging. 2001;18(12):913-25
11888346
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34
7814786
N Engl J Med. 1990 May 17;322(20):1441-6
2184358
Phys Ther. 1996 Mar;76(3):248-59
8602410
Nurs Health Sci. 2002 Dec;4(4):155-61
12406202
Neurology. 1999 Jul 22;53(2):375-82
10430429
Gerontology. 2004 May-Jun;50(3):177-81
15114040
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
3558716
Clin Geriatr Med. 1985 Aug;1(3):661-9
3913515
Neurology. 1993 Feb;43(2):268-79
8437689
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1986 Feb;34(2):119-26
3944402
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 1992 Apr-Jun;5(2):78-84
1590914
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
1202204
Adv Neurol. 2001;87:119-33
11347215
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Aug;50(8):1405-10
12164998
Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1583-6
9855505
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
1991946
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Sep;92(7):495-501
9842696
Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3
3403500
J Gerontol. 1990 Nov;45(6):M192-7
2229941
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 28;347(22):1761-8
12456852
Neurology. 2002 Jan 8;58(1):48-55
11781405
Adv Neurol. 2001;87:111-7
11347214
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Sep;48(9):1098-101
10983910
Neurology. 1998 Oct;51(4):968-71
9781514
Neurology. 2001 Sep 25;57(6):990-4
11571322
Adv Neurol. 2001;87:135-41
11347216
Neurology. 2000 Mar 28;54(6):1277-83
10746598
J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49
7183759
Ann Neurol. 1993 Nov;34(5):694-702
8239563