A retrospective comparison of costs for regional and general anesthesia techniques.
In this retrospective study, we compared the costs for three different regional anesthesia techniques with the costs of general anesthesia (GA). A total of 1587 anesthesia cases which were performed for orthopedic and trauma patients over a 1-yr period in a tertiary level, university hospital setting were analyzed. The anesthesia technique-related costs were determined calculating case-specific costs for personnel, supplies, and drugs. The techniques were compared on the basis of anesthesia costs and surgical procedure duration. As a result, we found that the costs per surgical minute largely depend on the surgical procedure duration. Based on the regression function, the cost advantage of spinal anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 13% for a 50-min case, 9% for a 100-min case, and 5% for a 200-min case. The cost disadvantage of brachial plexus anesthesia over GA can be estimated to be 19% for a 50-min case, 8% in a 100-min case, and 1% for a 200-min case. We found no difference in costs between epidural and GA. We concluded that cost comparisons of anesthesia techniques largely depend on the surgical duration of the cases studied. Even in a teaching hospital setting, spinal anesthesia has economic advantages over GA. Especially for short cases, brachial plexus block is more expensive in this setting.
Schuster
Martin
M
*Department of Anesthesiology and †Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Gottschalk
André
A
Berger
Jürgen
J
Standl
Thomas
T
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000765:Anesthesia, Conduction / Q000191:economics*; D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural / Q000191:economics; D000768:Anesthesia, General / Q000191:economics*; D000775:Anesthesia, Spinal / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009407:Nerve Block / Q000191:economics; D011997:Recovery Room / Q000191:economics; D012189:Retrospective Studies
Rodgers A, Walker N, Schug S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ 2000;321:1493–7.
Wattwil M. General or regional anaesthesia: pro general. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 1997;110:54–5.
Kendell J, Wildsmith JA, Gray IG. Costing anaesthetic practice: an economic comparison of regional and general anaesthesia for varicose vein and inguinal hernia surgery. Anaesthesia 2000;55:1106–13.
Song D, Greilich NB, White PF, et al. Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg 2000;91:876–81.
Chan VW, Peng PW, Kaszas Z, et al. A comparative study of general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and axillary block for outpatient hand surgery: clinical outcome and cost analysis. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1181–4.
Tessler MJ, Kardash K, Kleiman S, Rossignol M. A retrospective comparison of spinal and general anesthesia for vaginal hysterectomy: a time analysis. Anesth Analg 1995;81:694–6.
Riley ET, Cohen SE, Macario A, et al. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a comparison of time efficiency, costs, charges, and complications. Anesth Analg 1995;80:709–12.
Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Hodgson PS, et al. A comparison of spinal, epidural, and general anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2000;91:860–4.
Williams BA, Kentor ML, Williams JP, et al. Process analysis in outpatient knee surgery: effects of regional and general anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled time. Anesthesiology 2000;93:529–38.
Uhrlau Ch, Schäff M, Plötz J. Calculation of anaesthesia-related costs by using a scanner-based documentation system. Anaesth Intensivmed 2001;42:691–6.
Schuster M, Gottschalk A, Freitag M, Standl T. Cost drivers in patient controlled epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management after major surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:708–13.
Lennox PH, Chilvers C, Vaghadia H. Selective spinal anesthesia versus desflurane anesthesia in short duration outpatient gynecological laparoscopy: a pharmacoeconomic comparison. Anesth Analg 2002;94:565–8.
Nordin P, Zetterstrom H, Gunnarsson U, Nilsson E. Local, regional, or general anaesthesia in groin hernia repair: multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2003;362:853–8.
Li S, Coloma M, White PF, et al. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1225–30.
Dexter F, Tinker JH. Analysis of strategies to decrease postanesthesia care unit costs. Anesthesiology 1995;82:94–101.
Marcon E, Kharraja S, Smolski N, et al. Determining the number of beds in the postanesthesia care unit: a computer simulation flow approach. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1415–23.
Tremper KK, Barker SJ, Gelman S, et al. A demographic, service, and financial survey of anesthesia training programs in the United States. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1432–46.
Abouleish AE, Dexter F, Epstein RH, et al. Labor costs incurred by anesthesiology groups because of operating rooms not being allocated and cases not being scheduled to maximize operating room efficiency. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1109–13.
Franzini L, Berry JM. A cost-construction model to assess the total cost of an anesthesiology residency program. Anesthesiology 1999;90:257–68.
Rowe WL. Economics and anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1998;53:782–8.
Dexter F, Coffin S, Tinker JH. Decreases in anesthesia-controlled time cannot permit one additional surgical operation to be reliably scheduled during the workday. Anesth Analg 1995;81:1263–8.