title: The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in learning under changing task contingencies.
abstract: Previous investigations examining the rat prefrontal cortex subregions in attentional-set shifting have commonly employed two-choice discriminations. To better understand how varying levels of difficulty influence the contribution of the prefrontal cortex to learning, the present studies examined the effects of orbitofrontal cortex inactivation in a two- or four-choice odor reversal learning test. Long-Evans rats were trained to dig in cups that contained distinct odors. In the two-choice odor discrimination, one odor cup was always associated with a cereal reinforcement in acquisition while the opposite odor cup was associated with a cereal reinforcement in reversal learning. In the four-choice odor discrimination, an additional two cups containing distinct odors were used that were never associated with reinforcement in acquisition or reversal learning. Bilateral infusions of the GABA-A agonist, muscimol (0.5 microg) into the orbitofrontal cortex did not impair acquisition of either the two- or four-choice discrimination task. However, muscimol infusions into the orbitofrontal cortex impaired two- and four-choice reversal learning. In the two-choice odor reversal, muscimol treatment selectively increased perseverative errors. In the four-choice odor reversal, muscimol treatment increased perseverative, regressive, as well as irrelevant errors. These findings suggest that the orbital prefrontal cortex not only enables task switching by supporting the initial inhibition of a previously relevant choice pattern, but under increasing task demands also enables the reliable execution of a new choice pattern and reduction of interference to irrelevant stimuli.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Integrative Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
authors.forename: Jenna
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.forename: Michael E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Ragozzino
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001288:Attention / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D018755:GABA Agonists / Q000494:pharmacology; D058785:GABA-A Receptor Agonists; D008297:Male; D008845:Microinjections; D009118:Muscimol / Q000494:pharmacology; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D011963:Receptors, GABA-A / Q000502:physiology; D012718:Set, Psychology; D012903:Smell / Q000502:physiology*; D013239:Stereotyped Behavior / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D018755:GABA Agonists; D058785:GABA-A Receptor Agonists; D011963:Receptors, GABA-A; D009118:Muscimol
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jul;35(7):999-1015
references.pmid: 9226661
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1997 Dec 1;17(23):9285-97
references.pmid: 9364074
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1997 Oct;111(5):920-36
references.pmid: 9383514
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1999 Feb;113(1):32-41
references.pmid: 10197904
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Jun 1;19(11):4585-94
references.pmid: 10341256
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1999 Aug 1;19(15):6610-4
references.pmid: 10414988
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):308-17
references.pmid: 10731225
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Apr;131(3):320-35
references.pmid: 10789947
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4320-4
references.pmid: 10818167
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 15;20(12):4745-57
references.pmid: 10844044
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Mar 1;21(5):1720-6
references.pmid: 11222661
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Sep;14(6):1009-20
references.pmid: 11595039
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2002 Mar;77(2):202-10
references.pmid: 11848719
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2002 Feb;116(1):105-15
references.pmid: 11898801
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2002 Jan-Feb;9(1):18-28
references.pmid: 11917003
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2002 May 7;13(6):885-90
references.pmid: 11997707
references.citation: Brain Res. 2002 Oct 25;953(1-2):205-14
references.pmid: 12384254
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2003 Jul 14;143(1):49-56
references.pmid: 12842295
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2003 Aug;117(4):728-37
references.pmid: 12931958
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Sep 24;23(25):8771-80
references.pmid: 14507977
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2003 Oct;117(5):1054-65
references.pmid: 14570554
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2003 Nov 30;146(1-2):97-103
references.pmid: 14643463
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 3;23(35):11078-84
references.pmid: 14657165
references.citation: Brain. 2004 May;127(Pt 5):1108-26
references.pmid: 14985269
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 1972 Aug;36(2):362-77
references.pmid: 4626489
references.citation: J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Aug;87(2):249-60
references.pmid: 4473462
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1992 Oct;106(5):762-75
references.pmid: 1445656
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1994 Mar 31;61(1):79-86
references.pmid: 8031498
references.citation: Brain Res. 1994 Aug 1;652(2):323-33
references.pmid: 7953746
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Dec;57(12):1518-24
references.pmid: 7798983
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 1995 Jun;109(3):474-84
references.pmid: 7662158
references.citation: Crit Rev Neurobiol. 1996;10(3-4):317-56
references.pmid: 8978985