title: Comparative evaluation of simple insulin sensitivity methods based on the oral glucose tolerance test.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We compared five surrogate insulin sensitivity (IS) methods against the euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp. These methods were the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) and four methods based on the OGTT (OGIS, MCRest, ISIcomp, SIORAL).
  
  
  METHODS
  We compared these IS methods against the clamp (0.28 nmol.min(-1).m(-2) insulin infusion) M value in 147 women (58-61 years; BMI 19-38 kg/m2; 116 NGT, 25 IFG/IGT, six type 2 diabetic), by evaluating the correlation coefficient with M. We also tested the ability to reproduce the relationships between IS and typical IS correlates (BMI, fasting insulin, insulin to glucose OGTT area ratio and fasting, 2 h and mean glucose) by means of the "discrepancy index" D, in which (1) D=0 if the correlation between IS and the variable of interest is as with the clamp, (2) D is smaller than 0 if the correlation is overestimated, and (3) D is greater than 0 if underestimated.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All IS methods correlated with M (r=0.57-0.83, p<0.0001); for MCRest the relationship was markedly curvilinear. All IS measures correlated with the considered variables (r=0.29-0.94, p<0.0005); however, no method had D approximately 0 for all variables. The best surrogates of M were OGIS (one D not =0) and MCRest (two D not =0); the other methods either under- or overestimated the degree of correlation (three or more D not =0), in particular with fasting insulin (HOMA: D=-57%; ISIcomp: D=-36%) and BMI (HOMA: D=-14%; ISIcomp: D=-14%; SiORAL: D=-11%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  All IS methods were correlated with M. OGIS and MCRest were preferable to the other methods and in particular to HOMA for reproducing relationships with the independent variables.
authors.affiliation: Metabolic Modelling Unit, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Research Council, Padova, Italy. andrea.mari@isib.cnr.it
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mari
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pacini
authors.forename: A R
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Brazzale
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ahrén
mesh_terms: D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D003940:Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine / Q000592:standards*; D005215:Fasting / Q000097:blood / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D015309:Glucose Clamp Technique; D005951:Glucose Tolerance Test / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007328:Insulin / Q000097:blood / Q000378:metabolism*; D007333:Insulin Resistance; D016014:Linear Models; D008875:Middle Aged; D017698:Postmenopause / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D001786:Blood Glucose; D007328:Insulin
references.citation: Diabetologia. 2003 Jan;46(1):3-19
references.pmid: 12637977
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 1999 Sep;22(9):1462-70
references.pmid: 10480510
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000 Nov;85(11):4396-402
references.pmid: 11095485
references.citation: Diabetes. 1993 Nov;42(11):1663-72
references.pmid: 8405710
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2000 Mar;23(3):295-301
references.pmid: 10868854
references.citation: Diabetes. 2001 Jan;50(1):150-8
references.pmid: 11147781
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):539-48
references.pmid: 11289482
references.citation: Diabetologia. 2000 Feb;43(2):194-202
references.pmid: 10753041
references.citation: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;17(3):305-22
references.pmid: 12962688
references.citation: Diabetologia. 1985 Jul;28(7):412-9
references.pmid: 3899825