Lineage-specific loss of function of bitter taste receptor genes in humans and nonhuman primates.
Since the process of becoming dead genes or pseudogenes (pseudogenization) is irreversible and can occur rather rapidly under certain environmental circumstances, it is one plausible determinant for characterizing species specificity. To test this evolutionary hypothesis, we analyzed the tempo and mode of duplication and pseudogenization of bitter taste receptor (T2R) genes in humans as well as in 12 nonhuman primates. The results show that primates have accumulated more pseudogenes than mice after their separation from the common ancestor and that lineage-specific pseudogenization becomes more conspicuous in humans than in nonhuman primates. Although positive selection has operated on some amino acids in extracellular domains, functional constraints against T2R genes are more relaxed in primates than in mice and this trend has culminated in the rapid deterioration of the bitter-tasting capability in humans. Since T2R molecules play an important role in avoiding generally bitter toxic and harmful substances, substantial modification of the T2R gene repertoire is likely to reflect different responses to changes in the environment and to result from species-specific food preference during primate evolution.
Go
Yasuhiro
Y
Department of Biosystems Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan. go_yasuhiro@soken.ac.jp
Satta
Yoko
Y
Takenaka
Osamu
O
Takahata
Naoyuki
N
D000818:Animals; D019070:Cell Lineage / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D011323:Primates / Q000235:genetics*; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary; D011544:Pseudogenes; D043562:Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled / Q000235:genetics*; D013649:Taste / Q000235:genetics*; D000098706:Taste Receptors, Type 2
D043562:Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled; D000098706:Taste Receptors, Type 2
Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):703-11
10761935
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):469-82
8015440
Cell. 2001 Aug 10;106(3):381-90
11509186
Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244-5
11751241
Hum Mol Genet. 2002 Mar 1;11(5):535-46
11875048
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 2;99(7):4692-6
11917125
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 May;19(5):689-97
11961102
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;98(1):45-53
12584440
Science. 2003 Feb 21;299(5610):1221-5
12595690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 18;100(6):3324-7
12612342
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):805-14
12679530
Physiol Genomics. 2003 Jun 24;14(1):73-82
12734386
Genome Biol. 2003;4(7):220
12844351
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8337-41
12826614
PLoS Biol. 2004 Jan;2(1):E5
14737185
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14830-4
15466715
Hum Mol Genet. 2004 Nov 1;13(21):2671-8
15367488
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Aug;72(8):3194-6
1059106
Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
3447015
Mol Biol Evol. 1989 Nov;6(6):559-79
2484936
J Biol Chem. 1994 May 6;269(18):13685-8
8175804
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):715-24
7968485
Nature. 1996 Jun 27;381(6585):796-800
8657284
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 22;94(15):7799-806
9223266
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82
9396791
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3708-13
9520431
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):585-98
9668008
Nature. 2004 Dec 9;432(7018):695-716
15592404
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Mar;22(3):432-6
15496549
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1208-22
15703242
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Oct;16(10):1315-28
10563013
Cell. 2000 Mar 17;100(6):693-702
10761934
Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):601-4
10766242