title: Searching for stimulus-driven shifts of attention.
abstract: Several types of dynamic cues (e.g., abrupt onsets, motion) draw attention in visual search tasks even when they are irrelevant. Although these stimuli appear to capture attention in a stimulus-driven fashion, typical visual search tasks might induce an intentional strategy to focus on dynamic events. Because observers can only begin their search when the search display suddenly appears, they might orient to any dynamic display change (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992; Gibson & Kelsey, 1998). If so, the appearance of capture might result from task-induced biases rather than from the properties of the stimulus. In fact, such biases can even create the appearance of stimulus-driven capture by stimuli that typically do not capture attention (Gibson & Kelsey, 1998). The possibility of task-induced, top-down biases plagues the interpretation of all previous studies claiming stimulus-driven attention capture by dynamic stimuli. In two experiments, we attempt to eliminate potential task-induced biases by removing any need to monitor for display changes. In the first experiment, search displays did not change on most trials. In the second experiment, although new search displays appeared on each trial, we ensured that observers never saw the changes, by making them during large saccades. In both cases, dynamic events still received search priority, suggesting that some dynamic stimuli capture attention in a stimulus-driven fashion.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. francon@wjh.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Steven L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Franconeri
authors.forename: Daniel J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Simons
authors.forename: Justin A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Junge
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D012438:Saccades; D012984:Software; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Feb;63(2):286-97
references.pmid: 11281103
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1990 Jun;74(1):81-99
references.pmid: 2392957
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):699-706
references.pmid: 9627409
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Oct;10(5):601-21
references.pmid: 6238122
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Dec;27(6):1287-302
references.pmid: 11766925
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):427-32
references.pmid: 12930472
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(8):915-28
references.pmid: 2629207
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1988 Apr;43(4):346-54
references.pmid: 3362663
references.citation: Vision Res. 1989;29(11):1631-47
references.pmid: 2635486
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Oct;65(7):999-1010
references.pmid: 14674628
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
references.pmid: 1431742
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Feb;20(1):95-107
references.pmid: 8133227