Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
The latest-generation cochlear implant devices provide many deaf patients with good speech recognition in quiet listening conditions. However, speech recognition deteriorates rapidly as the level of background noise increases. Previous studies have shown that, for cochlear implant users, the absence of fine spectro-temporal cues may contribute to poorer performance in noise, especially when the noise is dynamic (e.g., competing speaker or modulated noise). Here we report on sentence recognition by cochlear implant users and by normal-hearing subjects listening to an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant, in the presence of steady or square-wave modulated speech-shaped noise. Implant users were tested using their everyday, clinically assigned speech processors. In the acoustic simulation, normal-hearing listeners were tested for different degrees of spectral resolution (16, eight, or four channels) and spectral smearing (carrier filter slopes of -24 or -6 dB/octave). For modulated noise, normal-hearing listeners experienced significant release from masking when the original, unprocessed speech was presented (which preserved the spectro-temporal fine structure), while cochlear implant users experienced no release from masking. As the spectral resolution was reduced, normal-hearing listeners' release from masking gradually diminished. Release from masking was further reduced as the degree of spectral smearing increased. Interestingly, the mean speech recognition thresholds of implant users were very close to those of normal-hearing subjects listening to four-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. Also, the best cochlear implant listeners performed like normal-hearing subjects listening to eight- to 16-channel spectrally smeared noise-band speech. These findings suggest that implant users' susceptibility to noise may be caused by the reduced spectral resolution and the high degree of spectral smearing associated with channel interaction. Efforts to improve the effective number of spectral channels as well as reduce channel interactions may improve implant performance in noise, especially for temporally modulated noise.
Fu
Qian-Jie
QJ
Department of Auditory Implants and Perception, House Ear Institute, 2100 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057, USA. qfu@hei.org
Nogaki
Geraldine
G
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001299:Audiometry; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D003638:Deafness / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D013067:Speech Perception
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Jun;41(3):549-63
9638921
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Apr;95(4):2277-80
8201124
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Oct;88(4):1725-36
2262629
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1996 May-Jun;58(3):127-35
8797215
Acta Otolaryngol. 1987 Nov-Dec;104(5-6):439-46
3434265
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2872-80
1629480
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Dec;104(6):3586-96
9857517
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Feb;113(2):961-8
12597189
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Feb;95(2):1085-99
8132902
Ear Hear. 1992 Aug;13(4):263-71
1397769
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:303-6
7668681
J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Dec;90(6):3028-35
1787242
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Feb;38(1):222-33
7731213
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):446-54
12880055
J Acoust Soc Am. 1993 Mar;93(3):1547-52
8473608
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Sep;100(3):1807-18
8817914
J Speech Hear Res. 1986 Jun;29(2):146-54
3724108
J Acoust Soc Am. 1987 Sep;82(3):874-85
3655121
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 May;115(5 Pt 1):2286-94
15139640
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jan;95(1):518-29
8120263
J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Jul;102(1):603-15
9228821
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Dec;35(6):1410-21
1494284
Am J Otol. 1994 Nov;15 Suppl 2:15-27
8572106