Improvement in embryo recovery using double uterine flushing.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of double uterine flushing on the recovery of embryos/ova in cattle. Two hundred and ten embryo recovery procedures were conducted using a double uterine flushing method, and the results were compared with 432 conventional single-flushing procedures. Cyclic Limousin (n = 403) and Guzera (n = 239) donor cows received an intravaginal progesterone releasing device and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate on Day 0. Between Days 5 and 9, donors received decreasing doses of FSH, which ranged from 200 to 300 IU (Bos indicus) and 300 to 500 IU (Bos taurus). On the afternoon of Day 7, donors received an injection of 500 microg cloprostenol and progesterone implants were removed 12 h later (morning of Day 8). Artificial insemination was performed between 14 and 26 h after first detection of behavioral estrus. Cows were randomly assigned to have embryos recovered by a double-flushing method (n = 210) or the conventional single-flushing procedure (n = 432). For the double-flushing procedure, after first flushing the whole uterus with 1L of Dubelco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), a Foley catheter was positioned in the uterine body to permit refilling of the uterus with fresh DPBS (80-150 mL). The catheter was closed with the plunger of a disposable 5 mL syringe, and the donors were allowed to rest in a holding area for 30 min. Thereafter, a second flush was performed to recover the solution remaining in the uterus. Animals from the control group were subjected to a single uterine flush. From 210 double-flushing procedures, 1409 viable embryos were recovered. In comparison, from 432 cows receiving the single-flushing procedure, 1993 embryos were recovered. Double flushing increased (P < 0.05) the number of embryos recovered per procedure compared to single flushing (6.7 +/- 0.4 versus 4.6 +/- 0.2, respectively; mean +/- S.E.M.). When double flushing was performed, average recovered embryos/ova increased (P < 0.05) from 8.3 +/- 0.4 to 12.7 +/- 0.7 in Limousin and from 7.9 to 11.5 in Guzera. Also, utilization of double flushing increased (P < 0.05) the number of viable embryos from 4.7 +/- 0.3 to 6.9 +/- 0.5 in Limousin and from 4.5 +/- 0.4 to 6.4 +/- 0.7 in Guzera. Mean total embryos/ova was similar (P > 0.05) between the control group and after the first uterine flushing in the double-flushing group; therefore, both flushings were conducted efficiently. In conclusion, double uterine flushing increased embryo recovery in cattle.
Neto
A S Castro
AS
Clínica Veterinária Garça, Garça, SP, Brazil.
Sanches
B V
BV
Binelli
M
M
Seneda
M M
MM
Perri
S H
SH
Garcia
J F
JF
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000196:embryology*; D003008:Cloprostenol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004343:Drug Implants; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D004958:Estradiol / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives*; D005260:Female; D005640:Follicle Stimulating Hormone / Q000008:administration & dosage; D010063:Ovum; D011247:Pregnancy; D011374:Progesterone / Q000008:administration & dosage; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D014599:Uterus
D004343:Drug Implants; C074283:estradiol 3-benzoate; D003008:Cloprostenol; D011374:Progesterone; D004958:Estradiol; D005640:Follicle Stimulating Hormone