title: International migration and infant health in Mexico.
abstract: This paper examines the flip side of the epidemiological paradox, namely the relationship between international migration experience and positive infant health outcomes in Mexico. Building upon past research that has explored the role of economic remittances in contributing to the positive relationship between international migration and birth outcomes in sending country communities, the present analysis focuses on the noneconomic effects of paternal migration experience on infant health. The data come from a hospital-based postpartum survey (HPS 2001) recently completed in two high-migrant sending states of Western Mexico. The findings demonstrate that the positive effect of international migration on infant health occurs in the context of considerable loss of social support and high stress levels. Socioeconomic improvements facilitated by the receipt of remittances, coupled with positive health behaviors, are two factors that contribute to this protective effect.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, 300 Bricker Hall, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, frank.219@osu.edu
authors.forename: Reanne
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Frank
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004641:Emigration and Immigration; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007229:Infant Welfare / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D007230:Infant, Low Birth Weight; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D008423:Maternal Age; D008800:Mexico; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome; D012923:Social Class; D012944:Social Support; D013315:Stress, Psychological
references.citation: Am J Med Sci. 1993 Jul;306(1):28-34
references.pmid: 8328506
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 2001 Jun;42(2):166-83
references.pmid: 11467251
references.citation: Future Child. 1995 Spring;5(1):176-96
references.pmid: 7543353
references.citation: Demography. 1996 May;33(2):249-64
references.pmid: 8827168
references.citation: Demography. 1999 Aug;36(3):339-53
references.pmid: 10472498
references.citation: Int Migr Rev. 1998 Winter;32(4):926-48
references.pmid: 12294302
references.citation: Public Health Rep. 1986 May-Jun;101(3):253-65
references.pmid: 3086917
references.citation: Future Child. 1995 Spring;5(1):121-38
references.pmid: 7633859
references.citation: Demography. 1987 Aug;24(3):299-322
references.pmid: 3678536
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1995 Jan;85(1):20-5
references.pmid: 7832256
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 Nov-Dec;32(6):288-94
references.pmid: 11138865
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Dec;954:140-74
references.pmid: 11797855
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1996 Mar;86(3):303-5
references.pmid: 8604751
references.citation: Cult Med Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;24(4):453-70
references.pmid: 11128627
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Nov 1;142(9 Suppl):S30-8
references.pmid: 7572985
references.citation: Demography. 1984 Nov;21(4):501-17
references.pmid: 6519320
references.citation: Soc Work. 1999 Sep;44(5):455-68
references.pmid: 10511821
references.citation: Lat Am Res Rev. 2001;36(1):107-27
references.pmid: 17595734