Observational versus experimental studies: what's the evidence for a hierarchy?
The tenets of evidence-based medicine include an emphasis on hierarchies of research design (i.e., study architecture). Often, a single randomized, controlled trial is considered to provide "truth," whereas results from any observational study are viewed with suspicion. This paper describes information that contradicts and discourages such a rigid approach to evaluating the quality of research design. Unless a more balanced strategy evolves, new claims of methodological authority may be just as problematic as the traditional claims of medical authority that have been criticized by proponents of evidence-based medicine.
Concato
John
J
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA. john.concato@yale.edu
D016022:Case-Control Studies; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D019370:Observation / Q000379:methods; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design
N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1450-6
8479464
N Engl J Med. 1993 May 20;328(20):1444-9
8479463
Am Psychol. 1993 Dec;48(12):1181-209
8297057
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):698-702
8309034
N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1029-35
8127329
Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 15;120(10):848-55
8154645
JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149-54
7799496
JAMA. 1995 Jun 21;273(23):1849-54
7776501
JAMA. 1995 Dec 13;274(22):1800-4
7500513
Lancet. 1996 Mar 23;347(9004):781-6
8622332
N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 21;337(8):536-42
9262498
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;51(2):81-91
9474068
QJM. 1998 Apr;91(4):265-77
9666949
JAMA. 1998 Aug 19;280(7):605-13
9718051
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 17;339(12):839-41
9738094
Neurology. 1998 Oct;51(4):1234-5
9781583
Neurology. 1999 Mar 10;52(4):682-5
10078709
J Clin Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;52(6):487-97
10408986
BMJ. 1999 Jul 31;319(7205):312-5
10426754
Lancet. 1999 Aug 7;354(9177):447-55
10465168
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):154-60
10639540
JAMA. 2000 Apr 5;283(13):1723-30
10755499
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1878-86
10861324
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92
10861325
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1907-9
10861329
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Dec 19;133(12):933-41
11119394
Neurology. 2002 Jun 25;58(12 Suppl 7):S6-12
12084862
JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33
12117397
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 3;137(5 Part 1):363-5
12204023
N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):645-50
12584376
Hum Reprod. 2004 Jan;19(1):8-13
14688150
N Engl J Med. 1976 Jul 8;295(2):74-80
775331
Am J Med. 1982 Feb;72(2):233-40
7058834
JAMA. 1982 Mar 26;247(12):1707-14
7038157
Circulation. 1984 Nov;70(5):767-74
6488491
Am J Med. 1987 Mar;82(3):498-510
3548349
Neuroepidemiology. 1987;6(1-2):6-16
3627345
Arch Neurol. 1989 Jun;46(6):611-4
2730374
Lancet. 1990 Mar 31;335(8692):765-74
1969518
Lancet. 1990 Apr 7;335(8693):827-38
1969567
Neuroepidemiology. 1990;9(4):223-7
2215847
Am J Med. 1990 Nov;89(5):630-8
1978566
Circulation. 1992 Sep;86(3):1046-60
1355411
JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5
1404801
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Sep 15;85(18):1483-92
8360931