title: The Major Depression Inventory versus Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry in a population sample.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study examined the association between the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) and the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN).
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire including the MDI was sent out to an adult population and was completed by a total of 10,448 persons. Psychiatrists used SCAN and interviewed a subsample (n=1093).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The specificity of the MDI was 0.22, the sensitivity 0.67 and Kappa 0.25 when Major Depression according to SCAN was considered as the index of validity, and with all depressive disorders the specificity was 0.44, the sensitivity 0.51 and Kappa 0.33. Higher educated persons and those with reported disability were less likely to be false negatives. The sensitivity and specificity for different cut-off scores when using the MDI total score were calculated.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The result from this study suggests that, when MDI is used in population-based samples, cut-off scores rather than the algorithm for depression should be used. The optimal cut-off score must be chosen according to the aims of the study.
authors.affiliation: Inst. of Public Health, Division of Social Medicine, Norrbacka, Karolinska Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden. yvonne.forsell@phs.ki.se
authors.forename: Yvonne
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Forsell
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003865:Major Depressive Disorder / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; D011570:Psychiatry / Q000379:methods*; D012372:ROC Curve; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 Apr;38(4):381-9
references.pmid: 6260053
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1989 Jul;46(7):664-7
references.pmid: 2735814
references.citation: Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
references.pmid: 7063747
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;55(2):109-15
references.pmid: 9477922
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 2001 Oct;66(2-3):159-64
references.pmid: 11578668
references.citation: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000 Jul;15(7):644-9
references.pmid: 10918346
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
references.pmid: 13688369
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;31(6):349-54
references.pmid: 8952375
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Dec;55(12):1146-8
references.pmid: 9862561
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;42(7):657-66
references.pmid: 4015307
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Mar;57(3):217-22
references.pmid: 10711906
references.citation: J Affect Disord. 1997 Jan;42(1):39-48
references.pmid: 9089057
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:63-70
references.pmid: 14221692
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;42(7):667-75
references.pmid: 4015308
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1990 Jun;47(6):589-93
references.pmid: 2190539