Prefrontal TMS produces smaller EEG responses than motor-cortex TMS: implications for rTMS treatment in depression.
BACKGROUND
The stimulus intensity of prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) during depression treatment is usually determined by adjusting it with respect to the motor threshold (MT). There is some evidence that reactivity of the prefrontal cortex to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is lower than that of the motor cortex at MT stimulation. However, it is unknown whether this is true when other stimulus intensities are used. We investigated whether the magnitude and shape of the overall TMS-evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) responses differ between prefrontal and motor cortices.


METHODS
Magnetic pulses to the left motor and prefrontal cortices (the middle frontal gyrus identified from magnetic resonance images) were delivered at four intensities (60, 80, 100, and 120% of MT of the right abductor digiti minimi muscle) for six subjects. Simultaneously, EEG was recorded with 60 scalp electrodes.


RESULTS
Global mean-field amplitudes (GMFAs) reflecting overall cortical activity were significantly smaller after prefrontal- than after motor-cortex TMS. A significant positive correlation (r (s)=0.84, p<0.01) was found between GMFAs of motor- and prefrontal-cortex TMS across the experiments. However, when correlation between the responses of motor and prefrontal cortices was examined, significant positive correlations were found at 80 and 100% intensities only.


CONCLUSIONS
This study provides further evidence that the prefrontal and motor cortices have different reactivity to TMS, but the MT may be used for determining the stimulus intensity of prefrontal rTMS treatment in depression, at least at motor threshold intensities or near to it.
Kähkönen
Seppo
S
BioMag Laboratory, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 340, FIN-00029 HUS, Helsinki, Finland. Seppo.Kahkonen@helsinki.fi
Komssi
Soile
S
Wilenius
Juha
J
Ilmoniemi
Risto J
RJ
D000328:Adult; D003863:Depression / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy; D004569:Electroencephalography; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology*; D017397:Prefrontal Cortex / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology*; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):946-8
10360138
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Summer;12 (3):376-84
10956572
Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Mar;115(3):583-8
15036054
Neuroimage. 2005 Feb 15;24(4):955-60
15670672
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;113(2):175-84
11856623
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2002 Oct;27(4):638-45
12377400
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;51:93-101
10590939
Br J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;177:169-73
11026958
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 May;160(5):835-45
12727683
Med Biol Eng Comput. 1999 May;37(3):322-6
10505382
J Psychiatr Res. 2001 Jul-Aug;35(4):193-215
11578638
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Jul 1;50(1):58-61
11457424
Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):233-7
8684201
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Mar;21(3):154-64
14755835
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):132-6
1552001
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(4):415-9
11164880
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Oct;128(4):557-62
10541752
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
7519144
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:449-54
10616615
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Apr;28(4):747-54
12655321
J Neurol Sci. 2003 Nov 15;215(1-2):75-8
14568132
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;113(9):1501-4
12169333
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):454-9
11274657
J Psychiatr Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;31(4):393-432
9352470