Social versus individual motivation: implications for normative definitions of religious orientation.
The traditional interpretation of "intrinsic" religiousness has fostered an unchallenged assumption that normative and substantive religious motivation is inherently individual and personal. Social motives for religiousness and structured practices have been characterized as "extrinsic" and as lacking in formative significance. We argue that this view is most applicable in American Protestant religions, and hence existing religious motivation scales reflect a distinctly American Protestant view. We then show that social motives and structured ritual practices are, in fact, as normative as individual motivations in several religious traditions. In particular, we describe the social practices and motives normative for Judaism and certain streams of Christianity. We then discuss the potential relevance of this analysis to emotion, collective identity, and moral judgment.
Cohen
Adam B
AB
Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-5050, USA. abcohen@berkeley.edu
Hall
Daniel E
DE
Koenig
Harold G
HG
Meador
Keith G
KG
D002835:Christianity; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007599:Judaism; D007600:Judgment; D009014:Morals; D009042:Motivation; D033303:Protestantism; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012928:Social Desirability; D012933:Social Identification; D014481:United States