Menstrual cycle, pregnancy and oral contraceptive use alter attraction to apparent health in faces.
Previous studies demonstrating changes in women's face preferences have emphasized increased attraction to cues to possible indirect benefits (e.g. heritable immunity to infection) that coincides with periods of high fertility (e.g. the late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle). By contrast, here we show that when choosing between composite faces with raised or lowered apparent health, women's preferences for faces that are perceived as healthy are (i) stronger during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle than during the late follicular, fertile phase, (ii) stronger in pregnant women than in non-pregnant women and (iii) stronger in women using oral contraceptives than in women with natural menstrual cycles. Change in preference for male faces was greater for short- than long-term relationships. These findings indicate raised progesterone level is associated with increased attraction to facial cues associated with possible direct benefits (e.g. low risk of infection) and suggest that women's face preferences are influenced by adaptations that compensate for weakened immune system responses during pregnancy and reduce the risk of infection disrupting foetal development.
Jones
B C
BC
School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Mary's College, South Street, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, UK. ben.jones@abdn.ac.uk
Perrett
D I
DI
Little
A C
AC
Boothroyd
L
L
Cornwell
R E
RE
Feinberg
D R
DR
Tiddeman
B P
BP
Whiten
S
S
Pitman
R M
RM
Hillier
S G
SG
Burt
D M
DM
Stirrat
M R
MR
Law Smith
M J
MJ
Moore
F R
FR
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001504:Beauty; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D003276:Contraceptives, Oral / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005145:Face; D005260:Female; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D008597:Menstrual Cycle / Q000502:physiology* / Q000523:psychology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011603:Psychophysiology; D006113:United Kingdom
D003276:Contraceptives, Oral
Q Rev Biol. 2000 Jun;75(2):113-48
10858967
Nature. 1999 Jun 24;399(6738):741-2
10391238
Riv Biol. 2001 Sep-Dec;94(3):403-26
11913097
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 7;269(1494):873-80
12028768
Hum Reprod. 2002 Jun;17(6):1459-63
12042261
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1095-100
12061950
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):39-44
12123296
Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2272-8
12202413
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S93-5
12952647
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1759-63
12964976
Curr Anthropol. 2002 Feb;43(1):19-61
14992226
Am Psychol. 2004 Feb-Mar;59(2):105-17
14992637
J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14
1195756
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):927-33
9633114
Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):884-7
9732869
Behav Brain Sci. 1998 Jun;21(3):353-63; discussion 363-97
10097017
Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2001 Mar;128(3 Pt 2):376-81
11319368