Effect of introduction of digital radiographic techniques on pre-operative templating in orthopaedic practice.
OBJECTIVE
To assess whether the introduction of digital radiographic acquisition has altered the magnification of pelvic radiographs compared to standard acquisition techniques, and whether this influences preoperative implant templating for total hip arthroplasty.


METHODS
District general hospital orthopaedic out-patient department.


METHODS
51 sets of patient radiographs were studied, where digital and standard radiographic techniques had been used for each patient. Key bony landmarks were measured, the scaled ruler analysed and the femur templated to gauge the most appropriate implant size of implant.


RESULTS
Introduction of digital techniques has resulted in a mean magnification of 97%, whereas most manufacturers' templates assume a magnification of 115-120%. For the Exeter femoral component, the templated size showed only moderate correlation with that templated from a standard radiograph (kappa index 0.46), although the offset templated showed good correlation (kappa index 0.89).


CONCLUSIONS
Surgeons should be aware that introduction of digital techniques of radiograph acquisition may reduce the magnification of the film and, therefore, reduce the accuracy of pre-operative templates supplied by the manufacturers of implants, resulting in incorrect selection of implants.
White
S P
SP
Department of Orthopaedics, Yeovil District Hospital, Yeovil, Somerset, UK. simonpwhite@blueyonder.co.uk
Shardlow
D L
DL
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000592:standards*; D011858:Radiographic Magnification / Q000592:standards; D012446:Sacroiliac Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging