title: Comparing strategies for United States veterans' mortality ascertainment.
abstract: BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine optimal strategies for complete mortality ascertainment comparing death certificates and United States (US) Veterans Administration (VA) records. METHODS: We constructed a cohort of California veterans who died in fiscal year (FY) 2000 and used VA services the year before death. We determined decedent status using California death certificates linked to VA utilization data and the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) death file. We compared the characteristics of decedents who would not have been identified by either single source (e.g., VA BIRLS alone or California death certificates alone) with the rest of the cohort. RESULTS: A total of 8,813 veteran decedents were identified from both VA decedent files and death certificates. Of all decedents, 5,698 / 8,813 (65%) veterans were identified in both source files, but 2,426 / 8,813 (28%) decedents were not identified in VA BIRLS, and 689 / 8,813 (8%) were not identified in death certificates. Compared to the rest of the cohort, decedents whose mortality status was ascertained through either single source differed by race / ethnicity, marital status, and California residence. Clinically, veterans identified from either single source had less comorbidity and were less likely to have been users of VA inpatient or long term care, but equally or more likely to have been users of VA outpatient services. CONCLUSION: As single sources, VA decedent files and death certificates each provided an incomplete record, and death ascertainment was improved by using both source files. Potential bias may vary depending on analytic interest.
authors.affiliation: VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles CA, USA. karl.lorenz@med.va.gov.
authors.forename: Karl A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Lorenz
authors.forename: Steven M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Asch
authors.forename: Elizabeth M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Yano
authors.forename: Mingming
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Lisa V
authors.initials: LV
authors.lastname: Rubenstein
references.citation: Med Care. 2002 Oct;40(10):929-40
references.pmid: 12395026
references.citation: Am J Manag Care. 2002 Jan;8(1):37-43
references.pmid: 11814171
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;6(2):102-9
references.pmid: 10068251
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2003 Oct 23;349(17):1637-46
references.pmid: 14573736
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):173-4
references.pmid: 12881231
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb 1;141(3):242-50
references.pmid: 7840098
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2001 Dec;142(6):1003-9
references.pmid: 11717604
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2000 Sep;140(3):402-8
references.pmid: 10966537
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb 1;151(3):307-14
references.pmid: 10670556
references.citation: Vital Health Stat 1. 1999 Jun;(38):1-16
references.pmid: 10464470
references.citation: Kidney Int. 2003 Aug;64(2):681-9
references.pmid: 12846766
references.citation: Neurology. 1998 Feb;50(2):362-7
references.pmid: 9484354
references.citation: J Med Syst. 1999 Jun;23(3):249-59
references.pmid: 10554740
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1992 Aug;82(8):1145-7
references.pmid: 1636839
references.citation: Ann Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;11(5):286-91
references.pmid: 11399441
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1706-12
references.pmid: 14534226
references.citation: Diabetes Care. 2003 Aug;26(8):2392-9
references.pmid: 12882868
references.citation: Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1324-36
references.pmid: 9749656
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1345-64
references.pmid: 12479500
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 1997 Feb;31(6):659-78
references.pmid: 9018210
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jan;131(1):160-8
references.pmid: 2403466
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2003 Feb;145(2):300-9
references.pmid: 12595848