title: Opisthobranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda) - more than just slimy slugs. Shell reduction and its implications on defence and foraging.
abstract: BACKGROUND: In general shell-less slugs are considered to be slimy animals with a rather dull appearance and a pest to garden plants. But marine slugs usually are beautifully coloured animals belonging to the less-known Opisthobranchia. They are characterized by a large array of interesting biological phenomena, usually related to foraging and/or defence. In this paper our knowledge of shell reduction, correlated with the evolution of different defensive and foraging strategies is reviewed, and new results on histology of different glandular systems are included. RESULTS: Based on a phylogeny obtained by morphological and histological data, the parallel reduction of the shell within the different groups is outlined. Major food sources are given and glandular structures are described as possible defensive structures in the external epithelia, and as internal glands. CONCLUSION: According to phylogenetic analyses, the reduction of the shell correlates with the evolution of defensive strategies. Many different kinds of defence structures, like cleptocnides, mantle dermal formations (MDFs), and acid glands, are only present in shell-less slugs. In several cases, it is not clear whether the defensive devices were a prerequisite for the reduction of the shell, or reduction occurred before. Reduction of the shell and acquisition of different defensive structures had an implication on exploration of new food sources and therefore likely enhanced adaptive radiation of several groups.
authors.affiliation: Museum König Bonn, Adenaueralle 160, 53113 Bonn, Germany. hwaegele@evolution.uni_bonn.de.
authors.forename: Heike
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wägele
authors.forename: Annette
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Klussmann-Kolb
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Nov;33(2):378-88
references.pmid: 15336672
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 May;123(1):29-38
references.pmid: 10806222
references.citation: Nat Prod Rep. 2001 Feb;18(1):1-49
references.pmid: 11245399
references.citation: Nat Prod Rep. 2000 Feb;17(1):1-6
references.pmid: 10714897
references.citation: Z Naturforsch C. 2003 May-Jun;58(5-6):426-32
references.pmid: 12872940
references.citation: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999 Jun;9(3):324-9
references.pmid: 10361088
references.citation: Intern Med. 1998 Nov;37(11):927-9
references.pmid: 9868953
references.citation: Zoology (Jena). 2001;104(3-4):303-12
references.pmid: 16351845
references.citation: Tissue Cell. 1984;16(5):719-30
references.pmid: 6151265
references.citation: Adv Mar Biol. 2002;42:67-136
references.pmid: 12094725