title: The cost structure of lung tuberculosis in Germany.
abstract: Although the total number appears to be decreasing, 7,886 new cases of tuberculosis (TB) were reported in Germany in 2001. Previous American publications reveal considerable differences in the costs caused by the disease. On the basis of the therapy guidelines of the Deutsches Zentralkomitee zur Bekampfung der Tuberkulose (DZK), this study estimates the mean direct outpatient and combined in- and outpatient costs of lung TB, together with the indirect costs of the disease on the basis of the most recent official health statistics. According to this, the mean outpatient costs per case were <euro>1,226 (adults) and <euro>785 (children under 15 years of age). The mean combined inpatient/outpatient costs ranged from <euro>14,301 (adults) to <euro>16,634 (children). These are joined by the mean costs of sick benefit amounting to <euro>2,088. The mean indirect costs per case were <euro>2,461. Consistent implementation of the recommendations of the German DZK is still necessary in order to reduce the significant economic impact of TB disease resulting in high health and socioeconomic costs.
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health c/o Institute for Medical Sociology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany. Roland.Diel@uni-duesseldorf.de
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Diel
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Rappenhöner
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Schaberg
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D017281:Cost of Illness; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000191:economics; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010045:Outpatients; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014397:Tuberculosis, Pulmonary / Q000191:economics* / Q000628:therapy
references.citation: Gesundheitswesen. 1996 Dec;58(12):657-65
references.pmid: 9081510
references.citation: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Dec;162(6):2079-86
references.pmid: 11112118
references.citation: Prax Klin Pneumol. 1984 Jun;38(6):201-16
references.pmid: 6382240
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2000 Oct;4(10):931-9
references.pmid: 11055760
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003 Feb;7(2):124-31
references.pmid: 12588012
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Feb;40(2):532-9
references.pmid: 11825968
references.citation: Pneumologie. 2001 Nov;55(11):494-511
references.pmid: 11719882
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 1995 Aug 7-21;155(15):1595-600
references.pmid: 7618981
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):70-6
references.pmid: 9878649
references.citation: Prax Klin Pneumol. 1981 Dec;35(12 ):1075-1105
references.pmid: 6808484
references.citation: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1999 May;3(5):382-7
references.pmid: 10331726