Evaluation of hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate hip fracture risk in relation to fall direction, and to elucidate factors that influence the impact force in falls on the hip. Eight healthy volunteers performed deliberate falls in three directions (lateral, posterolateral and posterior) on a force platform covered by a mattress of 13 cm thickness. Fall descent motions and impact postures were examined by a three-dimensional analyzer. The maximum ground force reaction, velocity of the greater trochanter at impact, and activity of quadriceps and gluteus medius were measured. In all trials of lateral and posterolateral falls, but not of posterior falls, the subjects hit their greater trochanter directly on the mattress. The impact forces were between 2,000 N and 4,000 N. Posterolateral falls showed significantly higher velocity at impact than did posterior falls. The height and the lower limb length exhibited positive correlations with the impact force in all directions of fall. In the lateral fall, there was a positive correlation between the activity of quadriceps and the impact force. In view of the impact point, force, and velocity, the posterolateral fall seemed to carry the highest risk of hip fracture.
Nankaku
Manabu
M
Department of Physical Therapy, Kyoto University Hospital, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. nankaku@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kanzaki
Hideto
H
Tsuboyama
Tadao
T
Nakamura
Takashi
T
D000058:Accidental Falls; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004576:Electromyography; D005260:Female; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014743:Videotape Recording
BMJ. 1997 Oct 25;315(7115):1065-9
9366737
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Mar;77(3):387-95
7890787
Lancet. 1997 Aug 23;350(9077):563-4
9284784
J Biomech. 1996 Jun;29(6):807-11
9147979
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(3):215-21
11315240
J Orthop Res. 1995 Nov;13(6):956-62
8544034
Am J Med. 1998 Jun;104(6):539-45
9674716
Lancet. 1999 Jan 9;353(9147):93-7
10023893
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Dec;13(12):1940-5
9844113
N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1506-13
11087879
J Biomech Eng. 1991 Nov;113(4):366-74
1762432
JAMA. 1995 May 3;273(17):1341-7
7715058
JAMA. 1994 Jan 12;271(2):128-33
8264067
Lancet. 1993 Jan 2;341(8836):11-3
8093267
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Jun;72 (5):689-700
2355030
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 May 1;145(9):786-93
9143208
Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:431-8
9143985
N Engl J Med. 1995 Mar 23;332(12):767-73
7862179
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Nov;41(11):1226-34
8227898
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8(3):240-6
9797908
J Biomech. 1999 Sep;32(9):993-8
10460138