Repetitive magnetic stimulation: a novel therapeutic approach for myofascial pain syndrome.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the short, medium and long-term effects of peripheral repetitive magnetic stimulation (rMS) on myofascial pain compared with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).Fifty-three subjects with myofascial trigger points (TPs) at the level of the superior trapezius muscle were allocated randomly to three groups. The first group (n=17) was treated with rMS, the second (n=18) with TENS and the third (n=18) received a placebo treatment. Each treatment consisted of ten daily 20-minute sessions. Patients were evaluated before and immediately following treatment, and at one and three months after the end of treatment. Outcome measures were: the "neck pain and disability visual analogue scale" (NPDVAS), an algometric evaluation of pain, an evaluation of the TP characteristics, and the range of cervical bending and rotation contralateral to the affected trapezius muscle. At the end of treatment, the rMS group showed a significant improvement in the NPDVAS, algometry, TP characteristics, and cervical contralateral rotation. This improvement also persisted at one and three months post-therapy. After treatment, the TENS group showed significant improvement in the same outcome measures except for algometry. At the one month follow-up visit, this improvement had returned to non significant levels in all outcome measures with the exception of NPDVAS. No significant effect of TENS was seen at the three-month follow-up visit. The placebo group showed no significant improvement in any measure. Our results strongly suggest that at medium and longer term intervals peripheral rMS may be more effective than TENS for the treatment of myofascial pain.
Smania
N
N
Centro di Rieducazione Funzionale, Policlinico G. B. Rossi, P.le L. A. Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy. nicola smania@univr.it
Corato
E
E
Fiaschi
A
A
Pietropoli
P
P
Aglioti
S M
SM
Tinazzi
M
M
D000328:Adult; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009209:Myofascial Pain Syndromes / Q000628:therapy*; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D013997:Time Factors; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D004561:Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Nov;77(11):1161-6
8931529
Neurosci Lett. 1993 Apr 16;153(1):9-12
8510831
Neuroreport. 1998 Jun 1;9(8):1745-8
9665594
Pain. 1989 Apr;37(1):1-5
2786179
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Feb;114(2):350-8
12559244
Exp Physiol. 1991 Mar;76(2):159-200
2059424
Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3193-8
11043547
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Oct;83(10):1406-14
12370877
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Mar;131(1):135-43
10759179
Science. 1965 Nov 19;150(3699):971-9
5320816
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;14(1):46-62
9013359
Minerva Stomatol. 1989 Jan;38(1):19-22
2710075
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jan;8(1):102-11
2019645
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jan-Feb;79(1):48-52
10678603
Neurosurgery. 1987 Jan;20(1):100-9
3808249
Recenti Prog Med. 1983 Sep;74(9):1090-2
6658172
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 May;72(6):385-9
2059105
J Rheumatol. 1994 Oct;21(10):1903-11
7837158
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1986 Jun;9(2):131-4
3488361
Phys Ther. 1994 Dec;74(12):1134-7
7991655
Pain. 1993 Sep;54(3):241-89
8233542
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Aug 1;23(15):1662-6; discussion 1667
9704373
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Mar;81(3):212-22
11989519
Lancet. 1984 Mar 31;1(8379):695-8
6143039
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Nov-Dec;76(6):471-6
9431265
Cranio. 1999 Oct;17(4):293-6
10650402
Reg Anesth. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):89-101
9010953
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 May-Jun;74(3):199-206
7779330