title: Consequences of the historical demography on the global population structure of two highly migratory cosmopolitan marine fishes: the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and the skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis).
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Yellowfin and skipjack tuna are globally distributed in the world's tropical and sub-tropical oceans. Since little, if any, migration of these fishes occurs between the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific Oceans, one might expect to see genetic differences between sub-populations in these ocean basins. However, yellowfin and skipjack tuna have extremely large population sizes. Thus, the rate of genetic drift should be slower than that observed for other tunas.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Low levels of genetic differentiation were observed between Atlantic and Pacific samples of yellowfin tuna. In contrast, no genetic differentiation was observed between Atlantic and Pacific samples of skipjack tuna.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Much lower levels of genetic differentiation were found among sub-populations of yellowfin tuna compared to those observed for other large tunas, probably due to the large population size of yellowfin tuna. Since skipjack tuna appear to have even larger population sizes, it is not surprising that no genetic differentiation was detected between Atlantic and Pacific samples of these fish.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. ely@sc.edu
authors.forename: Bert
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Ely
authors.forename: Jordi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Viñas
authors.forename: Jaime R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Alvarado Bremer
authors.forename: Donna
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Black
authors.forename: Luciano
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lucas
authors.forename: Kelly
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Covello
authors.forename: Alexis V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Labrie
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Thelen
mesh_terms: D000483:Alleles; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001267:Atlantic Ocean; D020137:Base Pair Mismatch; D045303:Cytochromes b / Q000235:genetics; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005787:Gene Frequency; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010140:Pacific Ocean; D012150:Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length; D011156:Population Density; D013045:Species Specificity; D014413:Tuna / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D045303:Cytochromes b
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2000 Feb;9(2):221-7
references.pmid: 10672166
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244-5
references.pmid: 11751241
references.citation: J Agric Food Chem. 2002 Feb 27;50(5):963-9
references.pmid: 11853465
references.citation: Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol. 1992 Jun;1(3):206-14
references.pmid: 1308204
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):552-69
references.pmid: 1316531
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496-7
references.pmid: 14668244
references.citation: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jul;36(1):169-87
references.pmid: 15904864
references.citation: Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
references.pmid: 1644282
references.citation: Genetics. 1981 Jul;98(3):625-40
references.pmid: 17249104
references.citation: Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555-62
references.pmid: 1743491
references.citation: Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585-95
references.pmid: 2513255
references.citation: Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):597-601
references.pmid: 2599369
references.citation: Evolution. 1985 Jul;39(4):783-791
references.pmid: 28561359
references.citation: Evolution. 1995 Aug;49(4):608-615
references.pmid: 28565146
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406-25
references.pmid: 3447015
references.citation: J Mol Evol. 1995 Dec;41(6):741-8
references.pmid: 8587119
references.citation: Genetics. 1977 Feb;85(2):331-7
references.pmid: 863231