title: Secondary individual prevention of hand dermatitis in geriatric nurses.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The incidence of occupational skin disease (OSD) in geriatric nurses (GNs) is increasing in Germany.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  A prospective controlled study of secondary individual prevention (SIP) of OSD in GNs was conducted.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two hundred and nine participants completed questionnaires prior to the start of the program and 3 months after its conclusion. One hundred and two GNs participated in an interventional program (intervention group, IG). Severity of OSD was classified upon each visit. Delta-TEWL values were measured at regular intervals. Findings were compared with those for 107 control group (CG) participants consulting a dermatologist on demand. SIP was not offered to CG participants.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Upon entry, 89% of IG and 90% CG complained of OSD (NS). Dermatologic examination revealed skin changes in 90% of IG at first consultation. Upon study completion, 59% of IG was free of OSD. Questionnaires 3 months after study completion revealed skin lesions in 53% of IG and 82% of CG (p<0.01). Delta-TEWL measurements reflected significant improvement of the epidermal barrier during SIP in IG (median 6.9-3.0 g/m(2)/h, p<0.001). Three months after study completion, 96% of IG and 86% of CG were still employed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Objective dermatologic and skin physiologic data reveal that SIP in GNs is effective in the secondary prevention of OSD. Further, IG was superior to CG in terms of health maintenance and employment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Human Sciences, University of Osnabrück, Sedanstrasse 115, 49090 Osnabrück, Germany. nschuere@uos.de
authors.forename: Nanna Y
authors.initials: NY
authors.lastname: Schürer
authors.forename: Ulrike
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Klippel
authors.forename: Hans J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Schwanitz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D032561:Cotton Fiber; D009783:Dermatitis, Occupational / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D005260:Female; D005851:Geriatric Nursing; D005858:Germany / Q000453:epidemiology; D017575:Gloves, Protective; D006229:Hand Dermatoses / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D020315:Latex Hypersensitivity / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015995:Prevalence; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012879:Skin Physiological Phenomena; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D000078329:Workforce
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 1993 Jan;128(1):1-9
references.pmid: 8427812
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(3):227-33
references.pmid: 2566226
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2001 Sep;145(3):453-62
references.pmid: 11531836
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 2003 Aug;49(2):70-6
references.pmid: 14641353
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jun;76(5):331-8
references.pmid: 12690490
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2002 Aug;147(2):281-4
references.pmid: 12174100
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2002 Aug;59(8):556-61
references.pmid: 12151613
references.citation: Curr Probl Dermatol. 1995;23:95-103
references.pmid: 9035933
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 2000 Jun;42(6):315-7
references.pmid: 10871093
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Jun;36(6):285-90
references.pmid: 9237006
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002 Aug;47(2):198-208
references.pmid: 12140465
references.citation: Exp Dermatol. 2002 Apr;11(2):159-87
references.pmid: 11994143
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2003 Jun;76(5):374-81
references.pmid: 12719982
references.citation: Occup Environ Med. 2001 Jun;58(6):392-8
references.pmid: 11351055
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1990 Mar;22(3):164-78
references.pmid: 2335090
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Aug;33(2):112-7
references.pmid: 8549126
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1985 Oct;13(4):216-23
references.pmid: 2935362
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 1997 Mar;77(2):102-4
references.pmid: 9111817
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 1998 Jan;78(1):27-30
references.pmid: 9498022
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1999 Nov;41(5):280-6
references.pmid: 10554064
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 2001 Mar;44(3):166-72
references.pmid: 11217989
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Apr;118(4):719-23
references.pmid: 11918722
references.citation: J Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct;40(10):881-5
references.pmid: 9800173
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 1999 Oct;113(4):533-40
references.pmid: 10504437
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2002 May;118(5):871-5
references.pmid: 11982767
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Feb;38(2):83-9
references.pmid: 9506220
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1998 Dec;39(6):307-11
references.pmid: 9874022
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 2002 May;146(5):770-6
references.pmid: 12000372
references.citation: Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001 Aug;74(6):437-42
references.pmid: 11563607
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 1995 Sep;33(3):172-6
references.pmid: 8565458
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 2001 May;44(5):297-303
references.pmid: 11298697
references.citation: Contact Dermatitis. 2002 Apr;46(4):220-3
references.pmid: 12081700