title: Direct restorative materials use in Australia in 2002.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  This study aimed to determine the reasons for dentists' choice of materials, in particular amalgam and resin composite, in Australia.
  
  
  METHODS
  A questionnaire was developed to elicit this information. The names and addresses of 1000 dentists in Australia were selected at random. The questionnaire was mailed to these dentists with an explanatory letter and reply-paid envelope.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 560 replies were received. Regarding choice of material, 99 per cent of respondents cited clinical indication as an influencing factor, although patients' aesthetic demands (99 per cent of respondents), patients' wish (96 per cent), patients' financial situation (82 per cent), and lecturers' suggestions (72 per cent) were also reported to influence respondents' choice of materials. Twelve per cent of respondents used composite 'always', 29 per cent 'often', 32 per cent 'sometimes', 23 per cent 'seldom' and 4 per cent 'never' in extensive load-bearing cavities in molar teeth. For composite restorations in posterior teeth, 84 per cent 'always', 'often' or 'sometimes' used the total etch technique, 84 per cent used a thick glass-ionomer layer and 36 per cent never used rubber dam. Fifty-nine per cent of respondents reported a decreased use of amalgam over the previous five years. Sixty-eight per cent of respondents agreed with the statement 'discontinuation of amalgam restricts a dentist's ability to adequately treat patients'. Seventy-five per cent considered that the growth in the use of composites increased the total cost of oral health care.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Of the respondents from Australia 73 per cent place large composite restorations in molar teeth and their choice of material is influenced greatly by clinical indications, and patients' aesthetic demands.
authors.affiliation: Primary Dental Care Research Group, School of Dentistry, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. f.j.t.burke@bham.ac.uk
authors.forename: F J T
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Burke
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: McHugh
authors.forename: R C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Randall
authors.forename: I A
authors.initials: IA
authors.lastname: Meyers
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pitt
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Hall
mesh_terms: D000134:Acid Etching, Dental / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001315:Australia; D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam; D003764:Dental Materials; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004363:Drug Utilization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004955:Esthetics, Dental; D005260:Female; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019239:Practice Patterns, Dentists' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016733:Rubber Dams / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D003764:Dental Materials; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D003723:Dental Amalgam