title: An expanded overview of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
abstract: Why is the incidence of osteoporotic fracture so much higher in women than in men? The dominant medical view holds that the exaggerated skeletal fragility and fracture risk of postmenopausal women solely reflects the loss of bone following withdrawal of endogenous estrogen. Indeed, an enormous amount of research in this area has attempted to understand the rise in fractures after menopause in terms of the impact of estrogen lack on bone remodeling. Recent insights suggest that this simple view does not offer an adequate explanation for the greater susceptibility of older women to fracture compared to that of men. It seems more reasonable to view bone health as a lifelong process, reflecting the contributions and influences of myriad events occurring throughout life to skeletal acquisition and maintenance. Only recently has the medical community recognized that the amount of bone present at skeletal maturity makes a powerful contribution to lifelong skeletal status. A second area that must be incorporated into discussions of this topic relates to bone size and geometry. Women's bones are inherently smaller than those of men. A bone's strength is determined by its size as well as by its material properties. In boys, pubertal increases in the cortical thickness of long bones are achieved by (testosterone-dependent) periosteal apposition. By contrast, increased cortical thickness in girls reflects bone expansion into the medullary space, with little or no periosteal apposition, suggesting an inhibitory effect of estrogen on the latter process. Consequently, at skeletal maturity, men have wider bones of greater mechanical competence. Although estrogen is generally held to be skeletally protective, this aspect of its actions may actually render women more susceptible to some fractures. In later life, men may lose even more bone from appendicular sites than do women, but men show much greater concomitant increases in periosteal apposition than women, permitting them to maintain a relatively favorable mechanical profile. These several findings are based on cross-sectional observations of relatively few individuals and therefore require confirmation in prospective longitudinal studies. The degree to which gender-related differences in later life skeletal adaptation reflects a bone's mechanical or metabolic environment has been frequently discussed but still awaits experimental confirmation.
authors.affiliation: Stanford University and Veterans Affairs Medical Center Palo Alto, CA, USA. rmarcus@lilly.com
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Marcus