Primary stability of various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia.
The treatment of fractures of the proximal tibia is complex and makes great demands on the implants used. Our study aimed to identify what levels of primary stability could be achieved with various forms of osteosynthesis in the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the proximal tibia. Pairs of human tibiae were investigated. An unstable fracture was simulated by creating a defect at the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Six implants were tested in a uniaxial testing device (Instron) using the quasi-static and displacement-controlled modes and the force-displacement curve was recorded. The movements of each fragment and of the implant were recorded video-optically (MacReflex, Qualysis). Axial deviations were evaluated at 300 N. The results show that the nailing systems tolerated the highest forces. The lowest axial deviations in varus and valgus were also found for the nailing systems; the highest axial deviations were recorded for the buttress plate and the less invasive stabilising system (LISS). In terms of rotational displacement the LISS was better than the buttress plate. In summary, it was found that higher loads were better tolerated by centrally placed load carriers than by eccentrically placed ones. In the case of the latter, it appears advantageous to use additive procedures for medial buttressing in the early phase.
Mueller
C A
CA
Clinic for Traumatology, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany. cmueller@ch11.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Eingartner
C
C
Schreitmueller
E
E
Rupp
S
S
Goldhahn
J
J
Schuler
F
F
Weise
K
K
Pfister
U
U
Suedkamp
N P
NP
D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology; D001858:Bone Nails; D016267:External Fixators; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D016268:Internal Fixators; D013977:Tibia / Q000502:physiology*; D013978:Tibial Fractures / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*