Neuroreflexotherapy for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review.
METHODS
Systematic review.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the effectiveness of neuroreflexotherapy (NRT) for low back pain (LBP).


BACKGROUND
Few of the alternatives for the management of LBP have a firm base of evidence for their effectiveness. Recently, a new intervention known as NRT has been developed in Spain and has been reported to have favorable results.


METHODS
Searches were undertaken according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines, and randomized controlled trials that evaluated NRT as treatment for patients with nonspecific LBP were included. A qualitative synthesis and an assessment of methodological quality were undertaken.


RESULTS
Three randomized controlled trials were included, with 125 and 148 subjects in control and intervention groups, respectively. NRT was compared with sham in two trials and standard care in one. Individuals receiving active NRT showed significantly better outcomes for pain, mobility, disability, medication use, consumption of resources, and costs. No major side effects were reported by those receiving active NRT.


CONCLUSIONS
NRT appears to be a safe and effective intervention for nonspecific LBP. This conclusion is limited to three trials conducted by a small number of experienced clinicians. Further trials in other settings are needed to determine whether these favorable results can be generalized.
Urrútia
Gerard
G
Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Santa Pau, Barcelona, Spain. gurrutia@hsp.santpau.es
Burton
Kim
K
Morral
Antoni
A
Bonfill
Xavier
X
Zanoli
Gustavo
G
D000208:Acute Disease; D002908:Chronic Disease; D016208:Databases, Factual; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012028:Reflexotherapy / Q000379:methods*; D004561:Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation / Q000379:methods*