title: Why wasn't 'continuous treatment' doctrine applied? Case on point: Knox v. Greenville Hospital System, 2005 WL 20007 S.E.2d--SC.
mesh_terms: D006739:Hospital Administration / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000451:nursing; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011826:Radial Nerve / Q000293:injuries*; D013022:South Carolina; D013997:Time Factors