Sexual modification therapies: ethical controversies, philosophical disputes, and theological reflections.
Knowing, either by the light of natural reason or by the light of Christian revelation, that homosexuality is a disordered condition is not sufficient for its being ethically permissible to direct self-identified homosexual persons toward just any treatment that aims to modify sexual orientation. For example, such an undertaking would be morally impermissible in cases where the available "treatments" are known to be both futile and potentially damaging to persons undertaking them. I, therefore, introduce this edition of Christian Bioethics by reflecting on (a) the position of homosexuality in our current psychiatric nosology, (b) problems with drawing causal inferences from the outcomes of psychotherapy studies, and (c) the advantages and disadvantages of appealing to traditional categories of sexual orientation in this discussion, all with an eye toward more deeply elucidating core ethical concerns involving the intentional psychotherapeutic modification of sexual orientation.
Howsepian
A A
AA
Fresno Medical Education Program, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000941:ethics*; D035841:Behavioral Research; D002835:Christianity; D005260:Female; D006716:Homosexuality / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012725:Sexual Behavior