title: Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.
abstract: Recent research suggests that outcome additivity pretraining modulates blocking in human causal learning. However, the existing evidence confounds outcome additivity and outcome maximality. Here the authors present evidence for the influence of presenting information about outcome maximality (Experiment 1) and outcome additivity (Experiment 2) on subsequent forward blocking. The results of Experiment 3 confirm that, with outcome maximality controlled, outcome additivity affects backward blocking but not release from overshadowing. Finally, the results of Experiment 4 demonstrate that information about outcome additivity has a similar effect on forward blocking if presented after the blocking training instead of before. The results are compatible with the idea that blocking results from inferential processes at the time of testing and not from a failure to acquire associative strength during training.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. tom.beckers@psy.kuleuven.ac.be
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Beckers
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: De Houwer
authors.forename: Oskar
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Pineño
authors.forename: Ralph R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Miller
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003071:Cognition; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male