Competition between antecedent and between subsequent stimuli in causal judgments.
In the analysis of stimulus competition in causal judgment, 4 variables have been frequently confounded with respect to the conditions necessary for stimuli to compete: causal status of the competing stimuli (causes vs. effects), temporal order of the competing stimuli (antecedent vs. subsequent) relative to the noncompeting stimulus, directionality of training (predictive vs. diagnostic), and directionality of testing (predictive vs. diagnostic). In a factorial study using an overshadowing preparation, the authors isolated the role of each of these variables and their interactions. The results indicate that competition may be obtained in all conditions. Although some of the results are compatible with various theories of learning, the observation of stimulus competition in all conditions calls for a less restrictive reformulation of current learning theories that allows similar processing of antecedent and subsequent events, as well as of causes and effects.
Arcediano
Francisco
F
Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Auburn University.
Matute
Helena
H
Escobar
Martha
M
Miller
Ralph R
RR
D002755:Choice Behavior; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D013663:Teaching; D013997:Time Factors