Morbidity and mortality audits: "How to"for family practice.
OBJECTIVE
While professions hold their members responsible for self-regulation, many physicians have insufficient information about outcome measures in their practices to judge performance and are inexperienced in performing audits to gather the information they need to judge performance.


OBJECTIVE
To develop a structure and process to support family doctors with little experience in doing quality improvement studies to conduct morbidity and mortality (M&M) audits.


METHODS
A family medicine teaching group provides members on a rotating basis to an M&M review committee. The committee meets eight times a year and has done four audits, the most comprehensive on the topic of preventable hospital admissions. Both implicit and explicit criteria were incorporated into decision making. Strengths and limitations of the audit process and practice changes that resulted from the audit are discussed.


CONCLUSIONS
Morbidity and mortality audits can vary in rigour. To promote physicians' interest in and commitment to audits, factors considered should reflect the goals, needs, skills, and time available of the physicians involved. Practical learning often results from simple projects.
Yaffe
Mark J
MJ
Department of Family Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Quebec. mark.yaffe@mcgill.ca
Gupta
Geeta
G
Still
Susan
S
Boillat
Miriam
M
Russillo
Balbina
B
Schiff
Benjamin
B
Sproule
Donald
D
D005194:Family Practice / Q000592:standards*; D005568:Forms and Records Control; D006801:Humans; D008485:Medical Audit / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D009017:Morbidity; D009026:Mortality; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods; D010044:Outpatient Clinics, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D018024:Peer Review, Health Care; D011367:Professional Staff Committees; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011792:Quebec