Informed consent in renal transplantation.
OBJECTIVE
This study was performed to assess how well completed the new consent forms are for patients undergoing renal transplantation.


METHODS
100 patients were randomly selected from the 160 who had a renal transplantation, at a single centre in the UK, over an 18 month period. The notes were located and the consent forms scrutinised.


RESULTS
Seven sets of notes could not be traced and 10 did not contain a relevant consent form. Forty eight per cent of completed forms mentioned the source of organ while 8% mentioned on which side the operation was to be performed. Twelve risks and complications were identified as being relevant to this procedure but no single form mentioned all 12. In most cases a senior member of the surgical team obtained consent.


CONCLUSIONS
The demonstrated variability in the amount of detail on consent forms lends weight to the call for the use of procedure specific forms. While such variability does not necessarily equate with not gaining valid, informed consent, this form, at present, serves as the only record of what has been discussed with the patient. These findings should encourage all surgeons to complete the forms themselves, be as detailed as possible, and ensure that the form is filed in the patients' notes.
Edwards
A G
AG
Department of Surgery, Southmead Hospital, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK. dr_ag_edwards@yahoo.com.
Weale
A R
AR
Morgan
J D
JD
D032962:Consent Forms / Q000592:standards; D004739:England; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000592:standards*; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000592:standards; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011361:Professional Competence