title: Prostate fossa packing: a simple, quick and effective method of achieving hemostasis in suprapubic prostatectomy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Suprapubic prostatectomy remains a very common surgical treatment for bladder outlet obstruction from an enlarged prostate in the developing world. It is a technically simple procedure which can be learned by nonurologists who perform the bulk of these procedures in the developing world. Intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, however, can be a problem. We describe our experience with prostatic fossa packing at the time of the procedure, as a very simple, quick and effective technique for maximal hemostasis.
  
  
  METHODS
  We have used this technique for several years at our institution and the results have been excellent. However, the major advantages of this technique became highlighted when the primary author visited Eritrea on a medical mission trip and used it in 42 consecutive cases. We looked at the hemorrhagic complications, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, infections and other complications related to the technique.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 42 patients were typical of the patients that are seen in the developing world for suprapubic prostatectomy. The age range was 49-102 years. 75% had indwelling urethral catheters secondary to urinary retention. The duration of the catheters was from 2 weeks to 10 months. All the patients who had the indwelling catheters had bacteriuria. 56% had associated bladder calculi and 25% had associated inguinal hernias. The average surgical time was 45 min. The average intraoperative blood loss was estimated at 160 ml. There were no blood transfusions. There were no infections and there were no complications related to the packing.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Packing of the prostatic fossa at the time of enucleation of the adenoma is a very simple, quick and effective way to achieve hemostasis in suprapubic prostatectomy. It is also very easy to learn. With this technique we have achieved zero rate of transfusion and no infections. The surgical time is also reduced. We have had no morbidities associated with this technique and highly recommend it.
authors.affiliation: Division of Urology, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D.C. 20060, USA. Mibomed@msn.com
authors.forename: A O
authors.initials: AO
authors.lastname: Mireku-Boateng
authors.forename: Aaron G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Jackson
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D006489:Hemostatic Techniques; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000379:methods; D013997:Time Factors