[Cicatricial pemphigoid: treatment with mycophenolate mofetil].
BACKGROUND
The severity of cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) varies. First-intent treatment of mild or moderate cases is dapsone. In life or sight-threatening cases, intravenous cyclophosphamide pulses are efficient but may have digestive side effects and imply repeated hospitalizations. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an oral and well tolerated immunosuppressant agent which has proved its efficacy in pemphigus and some bullous pemphigoid. In CP, encouraging case reports have been previously published. We report herein a retrospective study about 14 patients who have received MMF since 2000.


METHODS
There were 5 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 69 years. MMF was introduced in 3 different clinical situations: immediately in relay to cyclophosphamide in 7 patients with severe CP (group I); in case of a mild-severe relapse at distance from with dranal of cyclophosphamide in 3 patients (group II); as first-intent immunosuppressant agent in 4 patients whose disease was not under control with high-dose dapsone, but not life - or sight-threatening (group III). In all these patients, the disease was invalidating and not controlled by dapsone +/- sulfasalazine, but did not threaten life or sight. The aim was to achieve satisfying control of the disease with an oral and well tolerated immunosuppressant agent, and to maintain good quality of life. The dose of MMF was 1.5 or 2 g per day. The criteria of MMF efficacy was the healing of previous lesions and the absence of new progressive lesions.


RESULTS
MMF was efficient in obtaining or maintaining a good control of the disease in 10/14 patients, as long as the underlying treatment with dapsone (2 mg/kg/d) was maintained. In 7/10 cases, it was possible to decrease the dapsone dose in order to improve hematological tolerance. In the 3 other cases, a relapse occurred when the dose of dapsone was decreased. MMF was inefficient in controling the disease in 4/14 patients (29 p. 100). Clinical and biological tolerance of MMF was good in 13/14 patients.


CONCLUSIONS
In this series, MMF was proposed to heterogenous patients, who presented at that time a mild-moderate disease and for whom we wanted in improve the quality of life. MMF seems to be an interesting drug, capable of obtaining or maintaining satisfactory control of the disease and permitting the decrease of dapsone doses in some mild-severe CP. However MMF must not replace cyclophosphamide in severe sight or life-threatening forms of CP.
Ingen-Housz-Oro
S
S
Service de Dermatologie I, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris. saskia.oro@ch-argenteuil.fr
Prost-Squarcioni
C
C
Pascal
F
F
Doan
S
S
Brette
M-D
MD
Bachelez
H
H
Dubertret
L
L
D000284:Administration, Oral; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000894:Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003622:Dapsone / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003879:Dermatologic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009173:Mycophenolic Acid / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D010390:Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous Membrane / Q000188:drug therapy*; D011788:Quality of Life; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D000894:Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; D003879:Dermatologic Agents; D003622:Dapsone; D009173:Mycophenolic Acid