[A questionnaire survey of mental health and welfare in city health centers prior to the partial amendment of the mental health and welfare law going into effect].
OBJECTIVE
The situation of mental health of health centers in cities prior to the partial amendment of the Mental Health and Welfare Law going into effect was investigated to provide data relevant to mental health and welfare in cities.


METHODS
81 health centers were recruited from designated, core, and ordinance-designated cities as well as the 23 sections of Tokyo City, and were supplied into questionnaires by mail.


RESULTS
Less than 10 percent of the health centers had played a central role in establishing rehabilitation facilities. Regarding active support, small community-based workshops were most commonly subsidized. Only 13.3% of the health centers in Tokyo City provided support for daily life training facilities, while 60% had rehabilitation facilities. Seventy percent provided in-home services. More specifically, in contrast to the 64.7% of health centers in the designated cities which provided home-helper services, the figure was only 10.0% in ordinance-designated cities. Regarding the 2000 social adaptation training program, this was put into effect by less than half of the health centers in Tokyo City. No patients were admitted to rehabilitation facilities through 28.6% of the health centers, or underwent the consultation for rehabilitation facilities at 37.1%. Participation in care manager training sessions was low in Tokyo City but high in the other areas. Applicants for the health and welfare handbook and medical expense assistance for people with mental disorders were interviewed in 40.0% of Tokyo City's health centers and in over 70% of the others. There were problems with counter application in 50% of health centers in the core cities but not many in the remainder. More than 70% of health centers in the designated cities and Tokyo put the transfer system based on Article 34 of the law into effect but the percentages were lower for core and ordinance-designated cities. Patients were transferred at 34.2% of the health centers where the transfer system was enacted. Most of the designated cities and Tokyo established a council for mental health and welfare. However, this was the case for only 21.4% of the core cities and many of the ordinance-designated cities did not even consider this matter. Many health centers answered that welfare policy had advanced with the partial amendment.


CONCLUSIONS
The study revealed major gaps among health centers and specific problems with different background types.
Oi
Teru
T
Chiyoda Health Centre, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo.
Sasaki
Shoko
S
Takeshima
Tadashi
T
Minami
Ryuichi
R
Takaoka
Michio
M
Ishige
Kyoko
K
Tsunoda
Masashi
M
Ueno
Bunya
B
D003151:Community Health Centers / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D007564:Japan; D008603:Mental Health; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014041:Tokyo