title: On science and the discriminative law of effect.
abstract: This article considers the process of the dissemination of scientific findings from the point of view of the discriminative law of effect. We assume that the purpose of science is to describe the state of the world in an unbiased and accurate manner. We then consider a number of challenges to the unbiased consensual development of science that arise from differences between science that is done, submitted for publication, and published. These challenges arise from the differential reinforcers for both research and publication delivered by journals and editors for novel results, the undervaluation of systematic replication and findings of invariance, and general lack of reinforcers for failed replications. All these challenges bias science toward searching for, reporting, and valuing novel results and consequently lead to a biased and erroneous view of the world. We suggest that science should be approached more conservatively, and that a reevaluation of the value of replication, and especially failed replication, is in order.
authors.affiliation: University of Auckland. m.davison@auckland.ac.nz
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Davison
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Nevin
mesh_terms: D035081:Editorial Policies; D006801:Humans; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D012586:Science