title: Analysis of morbidity in patients with endometrial cancer: is there a commitment to offer laparoscopy?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Benefits of laparoscopy over laparotomy in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) are well known. As many patients with EC carry co-morbid conditions, surgery is exposing them to increased risk of complications. A review of the patients with EC recruited so far in a clinical trial comparing laparoscopy to laparotomy was performed. The goal was to identify patients carrying specific risk factors for complications, who would most benefit of laparoscopy and be the ideal candidates for this surgical approach.
  
  
  METHODS
  Between July 1995 and December 2002, 122 patients with uterine cancer entered the study. Sixty-three patients were allocated to the laparoscopy (LPS) arm (group A), while 59 were allocated to the laparotomy (LPT) arm (group B). Rate and type of intra-, early and late post-operative complications were prospectively recorded. Risk factors for complications are analyzed to define a group of patients truly benefiting from laparoscopy.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 12 patients out of 122 (9.8%) have experienced intra-operative, 43 patients out of 122 (35.2%) early post-operative and 25 patients out of 122 (20.4%) late post-operative complications. Rate of intra-operative complications was 4.7% in group A (3 patients out of 63) vs. 15.2% in group B (9 patients out of 59), P = 0.082. Early post-operative complications rate was 23.8% in group A (15 out of 63) and 47.4% in group B (28 out of 59), P = 0.011. Rate of late post-operative complications was 7.9% (5 out of 63) in group A vs. 35.5% (21 out of 59), P = 0.001. Univariate analysis shows co-morbid medical conditions, weight >80 kg, Quetelet index >30 and age >65 years to be predictive of complications and, in fact, a subgroup of patients presenting with these characteristics (n = 57, 30 in group A and 27 in group B) has been recognized to accumulate 60% of the overall complications. In these patients, multivariate analysis identifies the surgical technique (LPS vs. LPT) to be the only significant risk factor for complications.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  At least one third of the patients with EC carry serious co-morbidities with an increased surgical risk for complications. For this subgroup of patients, a laparoscopic-vaginal approach significantly reduces the rate of complications and should be the standard of surgical treatment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Tozzi
authors.forename: Sabine
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Malur
authors.forename: Christhardt
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Koehler
authors.forename: Achim
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schneider
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016889:Endometrial Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D007813:Laparotomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D009017:Morbidity; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors