Resource savings in the single reading of plain radiographs by oncologist only in cancer patient follow-up: a randomized study.
The aim of this study was to estimate the need for a radiologist's clinical report in the interpretation of plain radiographs in cancer patient follow-up. Consecutive new cancer patients receiving primary treatment were randomized between two arms with different diagnostic modes: a double-reading arm (an oncologist and then a radiologist independently interpreted plain radiographs) and a single-reading arm (radiographs interpreted by an oncologist only; if necessary a radiologist's clinical report was obtained on separate request). Altogether 869 eligible patients participated. No differences were found in the total number of plain radiographs between the two arms. The number of radiologists was 20 and there were 28 oncologists. A separate clinical report was requested from a radiologist in 44% of all plain radiographs in the single-reading arm. This saving of radiologists' work (56%) took place without detriment, as the indicators of earliness of diagnosis were the same in both arms. The role of the radiologist should be more in consultation than in routine interpretation during follow-up.
Järvenpää
Ritva
R
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. ritva.jarvenpaa@pshp.fi
Holli
Kaija
K
Hakama
Matti
M
D000368:Aged; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006295:Health Resources / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000628:therapy; D016522:Oncology Service, Hospital / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D018787:Radiation Oncology / Q000592:standards*; D011859:Radiography; D011872:Radiology Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data