title: Energy-minimization bias: compensating for intrinsic influence of energy-minimization mechanisms.
abstract: Anecdotal and scientific evidence suggest humans tend to undershoot targets in rapid movements. We investigated whether this undershoot bias derives from energy minimization mechanisms. Participants performed 200 trials of two tasks: (1) a simple slider push to a target, and (2) a modified version of (1), designed so overshooting was less energy consuming than undershooting. Results support that the undershoot bias found in (1), as well as the overshoot bias found in (2), results from an energy minimization mechanism. Energy minimization might be inherent to biological systems. Movement biases were un desirable for maximal performance. Nonetheless, participants presented biases despite financial incentives to perform maximally. Participants did, however, appear sensitive to systematic errors produced by the attraction to less energy costly responses. We suggest that the motor system is constrained such that maximal performance trades off with energetic optimality although humans are able to learn and compensate for the energy minimization biases.
authors.affiliation: School of Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Flavio T P
authors.initials: FT
authors.lastname: Oliveira
authors.forename: Digby
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Elliott
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Goodman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015982:Bias; D004734:Energy Metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000502:physiology