title: Comparison of FDG PET and SPECT for detection of bone metastases in breast cancer.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of FDG PET and bone SPECT for diagnosing bone metastases in breast cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was a prospective series of 15 patients with breast cancer who underwent both PET and bone scanning with SPECT. Comparison was performed on a lesion-by-lesion analysis. MDCT, MRI, and the patient's clinical course were used as references.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the lesion-by-lesion analysis (n = 900), the sensitivity for diagnosing bone metastases was 85% for SPECT and 17% for PET, specificity was 99% for SPECT and 100% for PET, and accuracy was 96% for SPECT and 85% for PET. In the statistical analysis, bone SPECT was significantly superior to FDG PET for its sensitivity (p < 0.0001) and accuracy (p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference was seen with regard to specificity. When classifying the bone metastases as osteoblastic or osteolytic, bone scanning classified 92% of metastases as osteoblastic and 35% of metastases as osteolytic, whereas PET classified 6% of metastases as osteoblastic and 90% of metastases as osteolytic.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Bone SPECT is superior to FDG PET in detecting bone metastases in breast cancer. The sensitivity of osteoblastic lesions is limited with FDG PET. Surveillance of metastatic spread to the skeleton in breast cancer patients based on FDG PET alone is not possible.
authors.affiliation: Division of Diagnostic Radiology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan. t.uematsu@scchr.jp
authors.forename: Takayoshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Uematsu
authors.forename: Sachiko
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yuen
authors.forename: Seigo
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Yukisawa
authors.forename: Takeshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Aramaki
authors.forename: Naoki
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Morimoto
authors.forename: Masahiro
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Endo
authors.forename: Hiroyoshi
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Furukawa
authors.forename: Yoshihiro
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Uchida
authors.forename: Junichiro
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Watanabe
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001859:Bone Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000556:secondary*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18