Visualizing conflicting evolutionary hypotheses in large collections of trees: using consensus networks to study the origins of placentals and hexapods.
Many phylogenetic methods produce large collections of trees as opposed to a single tree, which allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. However, to be useful, the information contained in large collections of trees should be summarized; frequently this is achieved by constructing a consensus tree. Consensus trees display only those signals that are present in a large proportion of the trees. However, by their very nature consensus trees require that any conflicts between the trees are necessarily disregarded. We present a method that extends the notion of consensus trees to allow the visualization of conflicting hypotheses in a consensus network. We demonstrate the utility of this method in highlighting differences amongst maximum likelihood bootstrap values and Bayesian posterior probabilities in the placental mammal phylogeny, and also in comparing the phylogenetic signal contained in amino acid versus nucleotide characters for hexapod monophyly.
Holland
Barbara
B
The Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand. b.r.holland@massey.ac.nz
Delsuc
Frédéric
F
Moulton
Vincent
V
D000465:Algorithms; D000595:Amino Acid Sequence / Q000235:genetics; D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence / Q000235:genetics; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D002965:Classification / Q000379:methods*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D007313:Insecta / Q000235:genetics; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008322:Mammals / Q000235:genetics; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010802:Phylogeny