Randomized double-blind comparison of lidocaine gel and plain lubricating gel in relieving pain during flexible cystoscopy.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the pain induced by outpatient flexible cystoscopy in men having local lidocaine jelly application or plain lubricant.


METHODS
We performed a randomized, double-blind study to compare the anesthetic effect of intraurethral 2% lidocaine gel (N = 45) and plain lubricant (N = 46) in men undergoing outpatient flexible cystoscopy. The age, prostate size, and examination time were similar in the two groups. Before cystoscopy, we filled the urethra with 20 mL of gel, which was held for 15 minutes. A 15.5F flexible cystoscope was then used for examination. A 10-point visual analog pain scale (1 = least to 10 = most painful) and a four-point pain grade (grade 1 = least to grade 4 = most painful) were used to measure the pain perception. The amount of postoperative analgesic used and willingness to adopt the same anesthesia for future cystoscopy were also recorded.


RESULTS
The mean pain scores for the lidocaine and plain gel groups were 2.8 +/- 1.1 and 2.5 +/- 1.1, respectively (P = 0.06), while the pain grades for the lidocaine gel and plain gel groups were 1.6 +/- 0.6 and 1.8 +/- 0.7, respectively (P = 0.19). In both groups, many patients (42.2% in the lidocaine gel group and 37% in the plain lubricant group) felt the external sphincter and prostatic urethra were the most uncomfortable areas during cystoscopy. Postcystoscopic analgesics were requested by 12 of 45 patients in the lidocaine group, but only 6 of 46 of the plain-gel group (P = 0.103). When patients were asked if they would desire general anesthesia for better pain control in future examinations, five of the lidocaine group responded positively, while three of the plain-gel group said they would (P = 0.62). The cost of lidocaine gel is about thrice that of the plain gel.


CONCLUSIONS
Using plain lubricant is cheaper and faster than applying lidocaine gel. The pain score, pain grade, postcystoscopic analgesic requirement, and anesthetics requested for the next cystoscopy were similar in the two groups. However, a larger investigation will be needed to achieve more significant statistical power.
Chen
Yung Tai
YT
Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taiwan.
Hsiao
Po Jen
PJ
Wong
Wai Yan
WY
Wang
Chung Cheng
CC
Yang
Stephen S D
SS
Hsieh
Cheng H
CH
D000368:Aged; D000553:Ambulatory Care; D000779:Anesthetics, Local / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000891:Anti-Infective Agents, Local / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002710:Chlorhexidine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D003558:Cystoscopy; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D005782:Gels; D006801:Humans; D008012:Lidocaine / Q000191:economics / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008153:Lubrication; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010146:Pain / Q000517:prevention & control*; D010147:Pain Measurement
D000779:Anesthetics, Local; D000891:Anti-Infective Agents, Local; D005782:Gels; D008012:Lidocaine; C010882:chlorhexidine gluconate; D002710:Chlorhexidine