title: Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery? A prospective randomized study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Bowel preparation prior to colonic surgery usually includes antibiotic therapy together with mechanical bowel preparation (MBP). Mechanical bowel preparation may cause discomfort to the patient, prolonged hospitalization, and water and electrolyte imbalance. It was assumed that with the improvement in surgical technique together with the use of more effective prophylactic antibiotics, it was possible that MBP would no longer be necessary.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  There is no statistical difference in the postoperative results of patients who undergo elective colon resection with MBP as compared with those who have no MBP.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study includes all patients who had elective large bowel resection at Campus Golda between April 1, 1999, and March 31, 2002. Emergency operations were not included. The patients were randomly assigned to the 2 study groups (with or without MBP) according to identification numbers. All patients were treated with intravenous and oral antibiotics prior to surgery. The patients in the MBP group received Soffodex for bowel preparation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 329 patients participated in the study, 165 without MBP and 164 with MBP. The 2 groups were similar in age, sex, and type of surgical procedure. Two hundred sixty-eight patients (81.5%) underwent surgery owing to colorectal cancer and 61 patients (18.5%) owing to benign disease. The hospitalization period was longer in the bowel-prepared group (mean +/- SD, 8.2 +/- 5.1 days) as compared with the nonprepared group (mean +/- SD, 8.0 +/- 2.7 days). However, this difference was not statistically significant. The time until the first bowel movement was similar between the 2 groups: a mean +/- SD of 4.2 +/- 1.3 days in the nonprepared group as compared with a mean +/- SD of 4.3 +/- 1.1 days in the prepared group (P = NS). Four patients (1.2%) died in the postoperative course owing to acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism. Sixty-two patients (37.6%) of the non-MBP group suffered from postoperative complications as compared with 77 patients (46.9%) of the MBP group.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results suggest that no advantage is gained by preoperative MBP in elective colorectal surgery.
authors.affiliation: Division of General Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Campus Golda, Petach Tikva Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. eramadan@actcom.net.il
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Ram
authors.forename: Yevgeni
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sherman
authors.forename: Ruben
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Weil
authors.forename: Tali
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Vishne
authors.forename: Dragan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kravarusic
authors.forename: Zeev
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Dreznik
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D019072:Antibiotic Prophylaxis; D002400:Cathartics / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D003106:Colon / Q000601:surgery*; D003108:Colonic Diseases / Q000601:surgery; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures; D004733:Enema; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D010710:Phosphates / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D011300:Preoperative Care; D011446:Prospective Studies
chemical_list: D002400:Cathartics; D010710:Phosphates; C018279:sodium phosphate