title: Optimizing independent finger flexion with zone V flexor repairs using the Massachusetts General Hospital flexor tenorrhaphy and early protected active motion.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Independent FDS action has been cited to be problematic with repair of multiple tendons in zone V owing to adhesion formation between the flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons. Of the several described flexor repair techniques the ideal tendon repair should be strong enough to allow for early active motion to minimize adhesion formation and maximize tendon healing. Biomechanical studies have proven the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) repair to be strong enough to allow for early active motion. The purpose of this study was to examine the use of the MGH technique for zone V flexor tendon injuries to allow for early protected active motion to achieve independent finger flexion through better differential gliding of the tendons.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a retrospective review 168 zone V finger flexor tendon repairs for 29 patients performed consecutively over 4 years when early active motion was not contraindicated. The same early protected active motion protocol was used for all of these patients. We reviewed total active motion, independent flexion, rupture, and need for tenolysis. These injuries involved 103 FDS and 65 FDP tendons to 103 fingers. The median follow-up period was 24 weeks. Of these 29 patients 19 were men and 10 were women. The average patient age was 28 years.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The total active motion for these zone V repairs was 236 degrees +/- 5 degrees Overall 97 of 103 digits attained good to excellent function and 88 of 103 developed some differential glide. One of these patients required a tenolysis. Three repairs ruptured in 1 patient owing to suture breakage that was associated with noncompliance with the dorsal extension block splint.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our retrospective review of 168 consecutive flexor tendon repairs showed that the MGH technique allowed for early protected active motion, which provided good to excellent functional outcomes with 88 of 103 developing independent finger flexion at an acceptably low complication risk.
authors.affiliation: Plastic Surgery Institute, Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9653, USA.
authors.forename: Bradon J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Wilhelmi
authors.forename: Robert H
authors.initials: RH
authors.lastname: Kang
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Wages
authors.forename: W P Andrew
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: James W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: May
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005383:Finger Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013165:Splints; D013536:Suture Techniques; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome