title: Efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine vs the individual components in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Antihistamine-decongestant combination products generally provide more benefit than individual components for adequately treating patients who have seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To compare the effectiveness and safety of a 24-hour, extended-release formulation of desloratadine and pseudoephedrine with the individual components in patients who have SAR with moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with SAR and significant nasal congestion were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study. Patients were randomly assigned for 2 weeks to once-daily treatment with desloratadine-pseudoephedrine, 5/240-mg tablets; desloratadine, 5 mg; or pseudoephedrine, 240 mg. Primary efficacy variables for the antihistamine and decongestant components of desloratadine-pseudoephedrine were morning and evening reflective total symptom score (TSS), excluding nasal congestion, and morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score during the 2-week treatment period, respectively. Secondary variables included morning instantaneous (end-of-interval) TSS (excluding congestion), nasal congestion score, reflective morning and evening individual symptom scores, overall condition of SAR, and therapeutic response.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 1121 patients were enrolled in the study, and 1047 patients completed the 2-week study. Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine was significantly more effective than desloratadine or pseudoephedrine monotherapy in reducing morning and evening reflective TSS (excluding nasal congestion) during the entire treatment period. Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine also was significantly more effective in reducing the morning and evening reflective nasal congestion score compared with desloratadine or pseudoephedrine monotherapy. Significant differences were seen between the desloratadine-pseudoephedrine and monotherapy groups for changes in morning instantaneous TSS (excluding nasal congestion) and nasal congestion scores. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Desloratadine-pseudoephedrine, 5/240-mg once-daily tablets, provided additional benefit over desloratadine, 5 mg, or sustained-release pseudoephedrine, 240 mg, monotherapy in the treatment of patients with SAR and moderate-to-severe nasal congestion.
authors.affiliation: Radiant Research, Encinitas, California 92024, USA. warrenpleskow@radiantresearch.com
authors.forename: Warren
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Pleskow
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Grubbe
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Weiss
authors.forename: Barry
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lutsky
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004809:Ephedrine / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D005260:Female; D039563:Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D006801:Humans; D017336:Loratadine / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000031:analogs & derivatives*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014663:Nasal Decongestants / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D015508:Nasal Obstruction / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D006255:Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D004338:Drug Combinations; D039563:Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; D014663:Nasal Decongestants; D017336:Loratadine; C121345:desloratadine; D004809:Ephedrine