The insufficiency of evidence to establish the business case for quality.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether a positive financial return on investment for quality-enhancing interventions is more likely for particular health conditions, in specific organizational settings, or with the use of particular interventions.


METHODS
Electronic search of MEDLINE.


METHODS
Search keywords included: business case, cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit, return on investment, costs, cost savings, quality, quality improvement, and program evaluation.


RESULTS
Only 15 of 1968 articles identified contained sufficient information on both the costs of implementing quality-enhancing interventions and the resultant changes in costs of care or revenues to permit the calculation of a return on investment.


CONCLUSIONS
Scant attention is currently paid in the quality-of-care literature to the cost of implementing quality-enhancing interventions. To understand which quality-enhancing interventions are likely to produce positive returns on investments, data collection and analysis must include tracking the investment and operating costs of implementing the intervention as well as the changes in revenues and costs that result from the intervention.
Kilpatrick
Kerry E
KE
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Health Policy and Administration, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7411, USA. kerry_kilpatrick@unc.edu
Lohr
Kathleen N
KN
Leatherman
Sheila
S
Pink
George
G
Buckel
Jean M
JM
Legarde
Caroline
C
Whitener
Lynn
L
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D019049:Developed Countries; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics*