Transparency and self-disclosure in family therapy: dangers and possibilities.
Therapy is a paid intimate relationship that thrusts clients and therapists into navigating personal and professional boundaries. When, where, why, and how is it appropriate and ethical for family therapists to be transparent, and when is it damaging? Theorists take varied stances from Haley's position of tight boundaries around therapist disclosure--whether in treatment or training--to the narrative viewpoint that therapists should be transparent about models of therapy, personal values, and life experiences that inform their practice and beliefs. However, these positions are not research based, and theorists who support disclosure offer few guidelines other than general statements. This article examines the history of ideas about disclosure in six major family therapy models, and the dangers and possibilities of transparency. It looks at the research on self-disclosure in individual therapy and whether and how it could apply to family therapy. Guidelines are proposed that take into account the multiple social identities of therapists and clients, and issues of safety and transparency.
Roberts
Janine
J
University of Massachusetts at Amherst, MA 01003, USA. Janine@educ.umass.edu
D004644:Emotions; D005196:Family Therapy / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D012106:Research; D012650:Self Disclosure