Reliability of McKenzie classification of patients with cervical or lumbar pain.
BACKGROUND
In the McKenzie system, patients are classified first into syndromes, then into subsyndromes. At present, the reliability of classification with this system is unclear. No study has included patients with cervical pain, and the studies to date have reported conflicting results.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study is to investigate the interexaminer reliability of the McKenzie classification system for patients with cervical or lumbar pain.


METHODS
Fifty patients with spinal pain (25 with lumbar pain and 25 with cervical pain) were included in the study.


METHODS
The patients were assessed simultaneously by 2 physical therapists (14 in total) trained in the McKenzie method. Agreement was expressed using the multirater kappa coefficient and percent agreement for classification into (i) syndromes and (ii) subsyndromes.


RESULTS
The reliability for syndrome classification was kappa = 0.84 with 96% agreement for the total patient pool, kappa = 1.0 with 100% agreement for lumbar patients, and kappa = 0.63 with 92% agreement for cervical patients. The reliability for subsyndrome classification was kappa = 0.87 with 90% agreement for the total patient pool, kappa = 0.89 with 92% agreement for lumbar patients, and kappa = 0.84 with 88% agreement for the cervical patients.


CONCLUSIONS
The McKenzie assessment performed by persons trained in the McKenzie method may allow for reliable classification of patients with lumbar and cervical pain.
Clare
Helen A
HA
School of Physiotherapy, The University of Sydney, 2141, Australia. clare.ha@bigpond.com
Adams
Roger
R
Maher
Christopher G
CG
D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000145:classification*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019547:Neck Pain / Q000145:classification*; D015588:Observer Variation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results