title: [Ratio of confirmed versus suspected occupational diseases as a parameter of quality].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the notifications of suspected causes of occupational diseases (NSC) under quality assurance aspects.
  
  
  METHODS
  We retrospectively analysed the NSC assessed by the institutions for statutory accident insurance and prevention (Berufsgenossenschaft) between 1998 and 2002.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Physicians were most frequently represented among the 357,050 notifications (60.2 %). The number of notifications dropped continually between 1998 and 2002. The number and quality of the notifications (NSC) depend on the knowledge of the occupational diseases as well as on the knowledge of the insured persons and on their respective occupational histories. The NSC are issued via the statutory social insurance bodies who are in contact with the patients, and the NSC also depend on the present scientific knowledge of the types of relevant diseases. Usually, the physicians were most frequently the notifiers of occupational diseases, with one exception, namely, incapacitating diseases due to damage to vertebral discs of the lumbar spine caused by many years of lifting of carrying heavy loads or of many years of work in an extremely bent position, in which cases the statutory insurance bodies themselves issued the notifications. Altogether 123,262 notifications were confirmed. The average quota of confirmations was > 40 % with physicians issuing the notifications, > 30 % with statutory pension insurance bodies and only approx. 12 % with notifying statutory sickness insurance bodies. The lowest quota of confirmations - namely, only 3 % - concerned the incapacitating vertebral disc disease of the lumbar spine mentioned above. Non-confirmed notifications of suspected occupational diseases involved an estimated cost of at least 58 million Euro.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  On-target improvement of the quality of notification of suspected occupational diseases is possible by exploring several avenues, including on-target assessment of evaluation criteria reporting by the statutory accident insurance bodies concerned and by regular advice rendered to the statutory social insurance bodies by occupational therapists.
authors.affiliation: Hauptverband der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften, St. Augustin. olaf.hagemeyer@hvbg.de
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Hagemeyer
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Butz
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Otten
mesh_terms: D000062:Accidents, Occupational; D003638:Deafness / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D004282:Documentation; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D007346:Insurance, Accident; D007348:Insurance, Health; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D009623:Noise, Occupational / Q000009:adverse effects; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012871:Skin Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D012943:Social Security