title: Status of femoral closure devices.
abstract: Both sealing and suturing closure devices have been shown to shorten hemostasis time, reduce the discomfort of manual or mechanical compression, and allow for earlier ambulation after cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary interventions without increasing vascular complications compared with conventional compression techniques. Several studies now report a reduction in vascular complications for percutaneous coronary intervention patients treated with closure devices compared with manual compression with pronounced benefit seen in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Adoption of a simple predeployment femoral angiogram is now standard practice for use of a closure device. In an attempt to develop devices that are safer and more "user friendly," considerable modifications and improvements have been made in newer generation devices. Ultimately, the acceptance of femoral closure devices will depend on which device provides a simple approach with reliable hemostasis and a cost that can justify their incorporation into routine practice.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL 60201, USA. tsanborn@enh.org
authors.forename: Timothy A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Sanborn
authors.forename: Ted
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Feldman
mesh_terms: D006328:Cardiac Catheterization / Q000295:instrumentation*; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D006488:Hemostasis, Surgical / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D011859:Radiography; D013536:Suture Techniques / Q000295:instrumentation; D016896:Treatment Outcome