New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the outcome of different types of polyethylene, bone cements and one design of uncemented fixation with porous and ceramic coating using radiostereometry, bone densitometry, conventional radiography and clinical parameters.


METHODS
Study I: 201 patients were extracted from 5 prospective randomised studies to evaluate femoral head penetration at two years with radiostereometry in four basic designs, cemented Lubinus and Reflection cups, uncemented Trilogy and Reflection cups. Studies II and III: 60 patients (61 hips) were randomised to receive either highly cross-linked or conventional all PE cups. 32 patients with bilateral arthrosis received hybrid THA with highly cross-linked PE on one side and conventional on the contra lateral side. Femoral head penetration and the migration of the cups were evaluated with radiostereometry in the supine and standing positions. DEXA and conventional radiography were used to evaluate the bone mineral density and radiolucencies around the cemented acetabular component. Studies IV and V: 90 patients (97 and 96 hips respectively) were stratified depended on age, gender, diagnosis and preoperative BMD to create 3 main groups of socket fixation. In the first group fluoride containing cement was used, in the second group Palacos cum Gentamicin and in the third hybrid THA with porous coated HA/TCP cup. In the hybrid group the fixation of the femoral component was again randomised to either of the two cements. The results on femoral and acetabular sides are presented separately in studies IV and V, respectively.


RESULTS
Study I: Cups with polyethylene sterilized in EtO had almost twice the proximal and 3D penetration rates compared with gamma-sterilized polyethylene. Regression analysis showed that the type of sterilization, age and weight was the most important factors affecting the penetration rate. Studies II and III: In the cemented study the proximal penetration was lower in the study group independent of position at 3 years, while in the hybrid study the penetration was lower in the study group only in the supine position at 2 years. The migration of the cup did not differ between the plastics in both studies. At 2 years the periprosthetic radiolucency and BMD did not differ significantly between the 2 types of PE used in the cemented study. Study IV: The subsidence of the stem did not differ between the groups, but the periprosthetic BMD decreased more in fluoride cement group at 2 years. Conventional radiography revealed higher progression of radiolucent lines in the Palacos group, but only in one region. Study V: The proximal migration of the cup was almost similar in all three groups. The three dimensional migration was increased in patients with osteoporosis. Postoperative radiolucent lines tended to disappear with use of porous coating covered with HA/TCP.


CONCLUSIONS
Study I: EtO sterilized polyethylene increased the femoral head penetration. Age and weight were also important predictors of the penetration rate. Studies II and III: The highly cross-linked polyethylene decreased the penetration rate mainly after one year probably reflecting less wear. The different mechanical properties of the two types of PE studied did not affect the early fixation of the cemented cup. Study IV: There were no obvious advantage of addition of fluoride to acrylic bone cement when used to fixate the femoral component. Study V: Use of fluoride containing cement or uncemented fixation did not improve the early stability of the socket compared to Palacos with Gentamicin.
Digas
Georgios
G
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden. georgios.digas@vregion.se
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D001843:Bone Cements; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology; D002484:Cementation; D019245:Compressive Strength; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008297:Male; D008422:Materials Testing / Q000379:methods*; D016348:Osseointegration / Q000502:physiology; D011095:Polyethylenes / Q000494:pharmacology*; D011379:Prognosis; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D020127:Recovery of Function; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D016896:Treatment Outcome
D001843:Bone Cements; D011095:Polyethylenes