title: Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aims of this study were to: (1) retrospectively assess the overall performance of formocresol pulpotomies in primary molars when definitively restored with a resin-based material; and (2) compare the results to previously published studies using more traditional restorative techniques (stainless steel crown, amalgam).
  
  
  METHODS
  Records of a 2-operator pediatric dental office using this novel restorative technique were reviewed. Pre- and postoperative radiographs of pulpotomized primary molars restored with Z-100 and with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were compared to the contralateral nonpulpotomized tooth. Radiographic success was determined by the absence of furcation/periapical osseous radiolucency and internal/external pathologic root resorption. Patient's age, gender, tooth type and arch, follow-up time, ZOE base type used (IRM only or IRM with glass ionomer overlay), and number of surfaces involved were the variables analyzed in the study. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-nine teeth in 52 patients met the selection criteria. Patient's age at treatment ranged between 44 and 118 months, with an average follow-up time of 21 months (range = 7 to 43). Significant failure rate was found in the mandibular arch (P = .035). When only the occlusal surface was restored, 100% success was obtained. With proximal restorations, 83% (15/18) success was obtained when the base was IRM followed by glass ionomer and 69% (22/32) success for IRM only (P = .259).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall, restoration of pulpotomized primary molars with resin-based material was inferior to reported success rates using stainless steel crowns. When proximal surfaces were restored, the failure rate (26%) was comparable to amalgam (23%). Prospective studies with larger sample size are necessary for definitive conclusions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. mguelmann@dental.ufl.edu
authors.forename: Marcio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Guelmann
authors.forename: Michael F
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: McIlwain
authors.forename: Robert E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Primosch
mesh_terms: D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003188:Composite Resins; D003785:Dental Pulp Capping; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005566:Formocresols; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008963:Molar / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011672:Pulpotomy; D011861:Radiography, Dental; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014094:Tooth, Deciduous / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement
chemical_list: D003188:Composite Resins; D005566:Formocresols; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D015035:Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement; C031025:formocresol