A comparison snapshot of states' small group market reform on access and enhancing valued plan features, 1999.
Small group health insurance statutes of 48 states and the District of Columbia, as of 1999, were reviewed. Reform provisions judged to have some relevance for the market are catalogued and total 74 distinct regulations. Judgment of market relevance was based on actuarial experience at a leading health insurance company. The regulations are categorized under: (1) Access improvement; (2) Pricing and Rating Reforms; (3) Improving stability of coverage; and (4) Improving valued features of plans. The nuances and variety of these regulations, adopted in various combinations by the states, are discussed. The complexity of the reform scenario suggests the need for impact studies that take into account the totality of reform. Past studies have evaluated the impact of selected major reforms in isolation, and, thus, have been inadequate to provide definitive conclusions on the reforms' impact.
Xirasagar
Sudha
S
Department of Health Services Policy & Managment, University of South Carolina, School of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29208, USA. sxirasar@sc.edu
Stoskopf
Carleen H
CH
Shrader
William R
WR
Glover
Saundra H
SH
D000206:Actuarial Analysis; D006264:Health Benefit Plans, Employee / Q000145:classification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019981:Health Care Sector; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D020408:Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D015273:Insurance Selection Bias; D013221:State Health Plans / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States