Genetic manipulation and our duty to posterity.
To what extent should scientists, doctors and the community be constrained in their decision-making by a duty to posterity? How should we as a community balance our desire to benefit the present generation against the need not to irretrievably harm our successors? These questions are discussed with particular reference to genetic research and treatment that may have great potential for people suffering from genetic disease but may cause inherited changes in future generations, either deliberately or inadvertently. We conclude that the community should take account of the interests of its successors but this should not immobilise us in the decisions we make for the present.
Skene
Loane
L
Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, University of Melborne, Australia.
Coady
C A J
CA
D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000941:ethics*; D015316:Genetic Therapy / Q000941:ethics*; D005854:Germ Cells; D006801:Humans; D016901:Intergenerational Relations; D028681:Moral Obligations; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012941:Social Responsibility; D035501:Uncertainty