Teaching evidence-based medicine to internal medicine residents: the efficacy of conferences versus small-group discussion.
BACKGROUND
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a required component of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Practice-Based Learning core competency.


OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of conferences and small-group discussions in enhancing EBM competency.


METHODS
EBM conferences and small-group discussions were integrated into an internal medicine curriculum. EBM competency was assessed by written examination following participation in both groups and compared with residents who had not participated in either format.


RESULTS
Small-group discussion participants (n = 10) scored higher on an EBM exam (17.8 +/- 4.5 correct out of 25) when compared with 10 conference participants (12.2 +/- 4.6, p = .010) and 26 residents who did not participate in either format (12.0 +/- 4.5, p = .002). Small-group discussion participants also reported increased confidence and high satisfaction.


CONCLUSIONS
Although more resource intensive, small-group discussions resulted in increased EBM knowledge, increased confidence with critical appraisal skills, and high satisfaction compared with a conference-based format.
Thomas
Kris G
KG
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota 559005, USA. thomas.kris@mayo.edu
Thomas
Matthew R
MR
York
Elaine B
EB
Dupras
Denise M
DM
Schultz
Henry J
HJ
Kolars
Joseph C
JC
D002983:Clinical Competence; D003226:Congresses as Topic; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007388:Internal Medicine / Q000193:education*; D007396:Internship and Residency; D008910:Minnesota