Effect of rapid or gradual grain adaptation on subacute acidosis and feed intake by feedlot cattle.
The effects of grain adaptation protocol on subacute acidosis and feed intake by cattle were studied in a completely randomized experiment using 12 crossbred heifers (384 +/- 25 kg BW). The dietary proportion of concentrate was increased from 40 to 90% (DM basis) either by rapid adaptation (65% concentrate diet fed for 3 d) or by gradual adaptation (five intermediate diets containing 48.3, 56.7, 65.0, 73.3, and 81.7% concentrate, fed for 3 d each). Feed intake and ruminal pH (by indwelling ruminal electrodes) were monitored over 20 d. Mean daily pH variables did not differ (P > or = 0.10) between treatments on any of the 3 or 4 d that 65 or 90% concentrate was fed. Variances of a number of pH variables were greater (P < 0.05) for rapidly adapted heifers than for those on the gradual adaptation protocol during adaptation to 65 and 90% concentrate. Mean hourly pH did not differ over the first 24 h of adaptation to 65% concentrate, but variance of hourly pH tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for rapidly adapted than for gradually adapted heifers for eight of the first 24 h. On the first day of feeding 90% concentrate, ruminal pH tended (P = 0.07) to be less at 11 and 12 h after feeding with rapid adaptation than with gradual adaptation. Variance of hourly pH increased steadily in rapidly adapted heifers from 6 h after feeding onward. Ruminal VFA concentration and osmolality did not differ between treatments. Ruminal lactate concentration was < 1 mM, except in two rapidly adapted heifers and one gradually adapted heifer after introduction to 90% concentrate. Adaptation method did not affect DMI or day-to-day variation in DMI. Detection of acidosis was associated with increased variance in ruminal pH variables. A range of individual responses to grain challenge was observed, but current management strategies for preventing acidosis in pens of cattle are based on responses of the most susceptible individuals. A better understanding of factors governing individual responses to acidotic challenge may allow for the development of more effective acidosis prevention practices.
Bevans
D W
DW
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada.
Beauchemin
K A
KA
Schwartzkopf-Genswein
K S
KS
McKinnon
J J
JJ
McAllister
T A
TA
D000138:Acidosis / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000821:Animal Feed; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods*; D000818:Animals; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001774:Blood Chemical Analysis / Q000662:veterinary; D001786:Blood Glucose / Q000032:analysis; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000097:blood; D002417:Cattle; D002418:Cattle Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology*; D004435:Eating / Q000502:physiology*; D005232:Fatty Acids, Volatile / Q000032:analysis / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D005285:Fermentation / Q000502:physiology; D005526:Food, Formulated; D006400:Hematocrit / Q000662:veterinary; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007770:L-Lactate Dehydrogenase / Q000097:blood; D011897:Random Allocation; D012417:Rumen / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D013997:Time Factors
D001786:Blood Glucose; D005232:Fatty Acids, Volatile; D002245:Carbon Dioxide; D007770:L-Lactate Dehydrogenase