Reducing structural-element salience on a source problem produces later success in analogical transfer: what role does source difficulty play?
Two experiments in reasoning by analogy were conducted to study the role of inducing source difficulty by reducing the salience of the source's structural elements. Three nonexclusive hypotheses were tested. According to the first, a difficult source problem improves analogical transfer because it increases the probability that the subject will notice the similarity between the source and the target. For example, errors made on both the source and the target can enhance the subject's awareness of the similarity between the two problems. According to the second hypothesis, a source that is difficult to solve is memorized better than an easier source. According to the third, source-problem difficulty affects the degree of abstractness in the representation of the solution elaborated by subjects. Experiment 1 showed that the higher frequency of spontaneous transfer between the source and the target when the source problem was difficult (Gick & McGarry, 1992) could be replicated in a cued-transfer situation. Experiment 2 showed that subjects given a difficult source, one in which the important element was not very salient, were better at categorizing isomorphic problems on the basis of structural features than were subjects given an easy source. The discussion deals with the implications of these results for the hypotheses tested and, more generally, for reasoning by analogy and education in general.
Didierjean
André
A
University of Provence and CNRS, Aix-en-Provence, France. andre@up.univ-mrs.fr
Nogry
Sandra
S
D000328:Adult; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003210:Concept Formation; D005717:Games, Experimental; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D014163:Transfer, Psychology