The ethics of human reproductive cloning: when world views collide.
Two camps in bioethics with seemingly opposing world views have staked out conflicting positions regarding the ethics of human reproductive cloning. These camps do not appear to share common concepts or ways of reasoning through which to exchange views and come to a meeting of minds about uses of this technology. Yet analysis of their respective approaches to several issues surrounding reproductive cloning, such as where the ethical limits of individual reproductive choice lie, whether the use of this technology would violate human dignity, whether it would create risks to the resulting fetuses and children that would make its use intolerable, and whether it would challenge certain core social values, reveals that they are not wholly opposed to one another. Indeed, it displays that they hold certain beliefs, values, and concerns in common. Moreover, it indicates that the different world views that they each presuppose, while flawed in certain respects, do not collide in every respect, but can be reconciled in significant ways that provide fertile ground for agreement about several issues related to human reproductive cloning.
Cohen
Cynthia B
CB
Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare; D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000941:ethics*; D032981:Dehumanization; D005053:Eugenics / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011639:Public Opinion; D011640:Public Policy; D046269:Reproductive Rights; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics; D012922:Social Change; D014481:United States