title: Should third party consent to research be mandated? Should there be a right for third parties to have data about them withdrawn from a research project? Two perspectives.
authors.affiliation: Bruce Lefroy Centre for Genetic Health Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Delatycki
authors.forename: Colin
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Thomson
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D004247:DNA / Q000032:analysis; D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D005190:Family; D030661:Genetic Privacy / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D036281:Genetic Research / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010375:Pedigree; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics; D045808:Refusal to Participate / Q000941:ethics; D035842:Research Subjects; D020458:Third-Party Consent / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence
chemical_list: D004247:DNA