title: Human reproductive cloning: an analysis of the Andrews Report.
abstract: There is nothing like an overwhelming consensus of opinion to encourage a less than rigourous approach to analyzing complex ethical issues. Unfortunately, this is nowhere more apparent than in the discussion of human reproductive cloning contained in the federal House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs' report on human cloning, released last August. The report may well fulfil the first half of its project, namely the empirical task of adequately summarizing and categorizing the various submissions made to the Committee. However, it is clearly inadequate as a discussion of the ethical and legal permissibility of human reproductive cloning.
authors.affiliation: Monash Centre for Public Philosophy, Monash University, Australia.
authors.forename: Kim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Little
mesh_terms: D026683:Advisory Committees; D001315:Australia; D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003709:Democracy; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making; D011640:Public Policy; D046269:Reproductive Rights / Q000941:ethics; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013234:Stem Cells