title: Survey of clinical practice: pre- and postoperative physiotherapy for pelvic surgery.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The objective of this survey was to obtain information about current physiotherapy practice for patients undergoing pelvic surgery. The aims were to evaluate whether differences exist in service provision between women's health physiotherapists (WHPTs) and hospital physiotherapists (HPTs) and in the guidelines used by physiotherapists to direct their service delivery. METHODS. A questionnaire was posted to the members of the Victorian Continence and Women's Health Physiotherapy Group (n = 130) and physiotherapists working in metropolitan and rural hospitals (n = 90). The questionnaire comprised questions relating to the aspects of treatment, including how referrals are made, funding, interventions provided and how they are delivered, and use of outcome measures. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis of differences between WHPTs and HPTs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response rate was 75.9%. In 67% of cases, service delivery was initiated by surgeon request, and most commonly for gynecologic patients (85%). Individual consultations were used on 96% of occasions and 8% were group sessions. Content of physiotherapy treatment for in-patients varied, with WHPTs significantly more likely to prescribe pelvic floor muscle exercises (P = 0.003), bowel advice (P = 0.001), avoidance of risk activities (P = 0.002), and awareness of postoperative symptoms (P = 0.001). Conversely, HPTs were significantly more likely to perform respiratory checks (P = 0.002) and mobilization (P = 0.001). Eighty-seven percent of respondents regarded their service as suboptimal, citing the need for evidence to support the content and best timing of intervention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Differences exist in physiotherapy treatment for pelvic surgery patients. Further research is required to establish whether, and which, elements of physiotherapy intervention are effective.
authors.affiliation: Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, School of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. h.frawley@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
authors.forename: Helena C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Frawley
authors.forename: Mary P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Galea
authors.forename: Bev A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Phillips
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005831:Genital Diseases, Female / Q000534:rehabilitation* / Q000601:surgery*; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006176:Gynecology; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006780:Hospitals, Rural; D006786:Hospitals, Urban; D006801:Humans; D007325:Institutional Practice; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011182:Postoperative Care; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011300:Preoperative Care; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014739:Victoria / Q000453:epidemiology; D014932:Women's Health Services