title: Treatment outcome of breast-conserving therapy in patients with positive or close resection margins: Japanese multi institute survey for radiation dose effect.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The relationship between a positive resection margin and the risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) is controversial. To evaluate the radiation dose and other factors influencing the ipsilateral breast tumor control (IBTC) in patients with positive or close resection margins after breast conserving surgery (BCS), the Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group (JROSG) S-99-3 study group conducted a multi-institute survey of these patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  The patients with less than 5 mm tumor-free margins after BCS were eligible for this study. A total of 971 patients from 18 institutes were enrolled in the analysis. The final pathological margin status was classified into 3 groups. Radiation doses to the tumor bed were less than 60 Gy in 252 patients, 60 Gy in 456 patients and more than 60 Gy in 233 patients.
  
  
  RESULTS
  IBTR was observed in 55 patients (5.8%). The IBTC rates at 5 and 10 years by the Kaplan Meier method were 95.6% and 87.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 10-year IBTC rates according to marginal status; 85.9% in positive margin patients, 91.0% in equal or less than 2 mm margin patients and 87.0% in 2.1-5 mm margin patients. Radiation dose to the tumor bed was a marginally significantly associated with the 10-year IBTC rate (> or = 60 Gy 90.8% vs < 60 Gy 84.2%, p = 0.057). In patients with positive margins, IBTC with radiation dose equal to or more than 60 Gy was significantly better (p = 0.039). The other factors influencing the IBTC were age (> or = 35 years vs < 35 years: p < 0.0001), menopausal status (p < 0.0001) and tumor size (p = 0.023).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients with positive margins, IBTC with radiation dose equal to or more than 60 Gy was significantly better than the others. We recommend that the tumor bed be irradiated with at least 60 Gy in the patients with positive margins. Further follow-up is necessary to draw final conclusions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan. kkarasaw@med juntendo.ac.jp
authors.forename: Kumiko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Karasawa
authors.forename: Michihide
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mitsumori
authors.forename: Chikako
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Yamauchi
authors.forename: Kotaro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gomi
authors.forename: Masaaki
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kataoka
authors.forename: Takayoshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Uematsu
authors.forename: Takeshi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Kodaira
authors.forename: Michitaka
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Yamakawa
authors.forename: Katsuyuki
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Karasawa
authors.forename: Toshikazu
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Watanabe
authors.forename: Kayoko
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Tsujino
authors.forename: Masahiro
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hiraoka
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology* / Q000628:therapy*; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan / Q000453:epidemiology; D015412:Mastectomy, Segmental; D008593:Menopause; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome