title: Corticosteroids for pulmonary sarcoidosis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pulmonary sarcoidosis is a common condition with an unpredictable course. Oral (OCS) or inhaled steroids (ICS) are widely used in its treatment, but there is no consensus about when and in whom therapy should be initiated, what dose should be given and for how long. Corticosteroids given for several months have deleterious side-effects so it is important to know whether they have any maintained benefit in pulmonary sarcoidosis.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine the randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence for the benefit of corticosteroids (oral or inhaled) in the treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched using predefined terms. Bibliographies of retrieved RCTs and reviews were searched for additional RCTs. Pharmaceutical companies and authors of identified RCTs were contacted for other published and unpublished studies. Searches are current as of May 2004.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two reviewers independently assessed full text articles for inclusion based upon the following criteria: the study had to be a RCT or controlled clinical trial in adults with histological evidence of pulmonary sarcoidosis, treated with OCS (oral steroids) or ICS (oral steroids), compared with a control.
  
  
  METHODS
  Study quality was assessed and data extracted independently by two reviewers. The primary outcome was CXR (chest x-ray). Outcomes were analysed as continuous and dichotomous outcomes, using standard statistical techniques. Heterogeneity was explored where it was identified.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twelve RCTs of variable quality involving 1051 participants met the inclusion criteria of the review. The oral steroid dose was equivalent to prednisolone 4-40 mg/day. OCS: there was an improvement in CXR over 3-24 months (Relative Risk (RR): 1.46 [1.01 to 2.09], 3 studies), but this finding requires cautious interpretation. No other significant differences were identified on secondary outcomes. ICS: Data were inadequate to perform meaningful analysis of data on CXR. Two studies showed no improvement in lung function, In one study there was an improvement in diffusing capacity in the treated group. There were no data on side-effects. In one study symptoms improved at the end of six months of treatment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Oral steroids improved the chest X-ray and a global score of CXR, symptoms and spirometry over 3-24 months. However, there is little evidence of an improvement in lung function. There are limited data beyond two years to indicate whether oral steroids have any modifying effect on long-term disease progression. Oral steroids may be of benefit for patients with Stage 2 and 3 disease with moderate to severe or progressive symptoms or CXR changes.
authors.affiliation: Respiratory Medicine, St Helier Hospital NHS Trust, Wrythe Lane, Carshalton, Surrey, UK. shanthi.paramothayan@epsom-sthelier.nhs.uk
authors.forename: N S
authors.initials: NS
authors.lastname: Paramothayan
authors.forename: T J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Lasserson
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Jones
mesh_terms: D000280:Administration, Inhalation; D000284:Administration, Oral; D005938:Glucocorticoids / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D011859:Radiography; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D017565:Sarcoidosis, Pulmonary / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000188:drug therapy*
chemical_list: D005938:Glucocorticoids