title: Rural implications of Medicare's post-acute-care transfer payment policy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Under the Medicare post-acute-care (PAC) transfer policy, acute-care hospitals are reimbursed under a per-diem formula whenever beneficiaries are discharged from selected diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) to a skilled nursing facility, home health care, or a prospective payment system (PPS)-excluded facility. Total per-diem payments are below the full DRG payment only when the patient's length of stay (LOS) is short relative to the geometric mean LOS for the DRG; otherwise, the full DRG payment is received. This policy originally applied to 10 DRGs beginning in fiscal year 1999 and was expanded to additional DRGs in FY2004. The Secretary may include other DRGs and types of PAC settings in future expansions.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This article examines how the initial policy change affected rural and urban hospitals and investigates the likely impact of the FY2004 expansion and other possible future expansions.
  
  
  METHODS
  The authors used 1998-2001 Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MEDPAR) data to investigate changes in hospital discharge patterns after the original policy was implemented, compute the change in Medicare revenue resulting from the payment change, and simulate the expected revenue reductions under expansions to additional DRGs and swing-bed discharges.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Neither rural nor urban hospitals appear to have made a sustained change in their discharge behavior so as to limit their exposure to the transfer policy. Financial impacts from the initial policy were similar in relative terms for both types of hospitals and would be expected to be fairly similar for an expansion to additional DRGs. On average, including swing-bed discharges in the transfer policy would have a very small financial impact on small rural hospitals; only hospitals that make extensive use of swing beds after a short inpatient stay might expect large declines in total Medicare revenue.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Rural hospitals are not disproportionately harmed by the PAC transfer policy. An expanded policy may even benefit rural hospitals by recognizing their lower use of post-acute-care and readjusting DRG weights so that they are paid more appropriately when providing the full course of inpatient care.
authors.affiliation: NORC Walsh Center for Rural Health Analysis, NORC at the University of Chicago, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. schoenman_julie@norc.uchicago.edu
authors.forename: Julie A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Schoenman
authors.forename: Curt D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Mueller
mesh_terms: D000359:Aftercare / Q000145:classification / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups / Q000191:economics; D006699:Home Care Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006780:Hospitals, Rural / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006786:Hospitals, Urban / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010351:Patient Discharge / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010360:Patient Transfer / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011445:Prospective Payment System / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012866:Skilled Nursing Facilities / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States