title: Is local excision of T2/T3 rectal cancers adequate?
abstract: In selected patients, local excision of rectal cancer may be an alternative to radical surgery such as abdominoperineal excision of the rectum or anterior resection. Local excision carries lower mortality and morbidity, without the functional disturbance or alteration in body image that can be associated with radical surgery. There are several techniques of local therapy for rectal cancer, with most experience being available in transanal excision. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is also used but experience with this newer technique is limited. Patient selection is the most important factor in successful local excision; however, specific criteria for selecting patients have not been universally accepted. Review of the published literature is difficult because of the variation in adjuvant therapy regimes and follow-up strategies, as well as results reported in terms of local recurrence and survival rates. There is increasing evidence to suggest that local excision should be restricted to patients with T1-stage rectal cancer without high-risk factors. The place for local excision in patients with T2 or high-risk T1 tumours requires prospective, randomised multicentre trials comparing radical surgery with local excision, with or without adjuvant therapy. Local excision for T3 tumours should be restricted to the palliative setting or patients unfit for radical surgery.
authors.affiliation: Academic Surgical Unit, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK.
authors.forename: D L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Beral
authors.forename: J R T
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Monson
mesh_terms: D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans