title: Discussion: Targeting is making trade-offs.
abstract: The previous articles presented different aspects of targeting: the implicit political implications, the trade-offs in giving power to different stakeholders to decide and to implement targeting, perceptions of frontline workers in implementing a program, and a technical article about selecting a scale for targeting, which we review in greater detail. It is well recognized that targeting results in a trade-off between not serving those who should be served and including those who should not be served. Less well recognized are the trade-offs that are the consequences of deciding between using indicators of risk vs. using indicators that predict benefit.
authors.affiliation: Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
authors.forename: Jean-Pierre
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Habicht
authors.forename: Edward A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Frongillo
mesh_terms: D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D009747:Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D014481:United States