Occupational light-vehicle use and OHS legislative frameworks: an Australian example.
Occupational light vehicle (OLV) use and associated exposures and hazards in the Australian context are described. Available insurance data indicate that the OLV injury burden, which is greater than that of other work-road users, is growing as OLV use changes incidental to workers' primary occupations and work patterns. Legislation that affects OLV users is reviewed and the shifting of the burden of responsibility for injured or killed OLV users between workers' compensation, motor accident insurance and public health systems is described. Changes to OHS regulatory frameworks are proposed to better address OLV-relevant policy and practice. These issues are relevant for many international jurisdictions.
Stuckey
Rwth
R
Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Central and Eastern Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. rwth.stuckey@med.monash.edu.au
Lamontagne
Anthony D
AD
D000063:Accidents, Traffic / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D001315:Australia; D017281:Cost of Illness; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D007341:Insurance / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018986:Motor Vehicles; D009790:Occupations; D011640:Public Policy; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000191:economics / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control