No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
Several lines of research suggest that two distinct timing mechanisms are involved in temporal information processing: a sensory mechanism for processing of durations in the range of milliseconds and a cognitively controlled mechanism for processing of longer durations. The present study employed a dual-task approach and a sensory interference paradigm to further elucidate the distinct timing hypothesis. Experiment 1 used mental arithmetic as a nontemporal secondary task, Experiment 2 a memory search task, and Experiment 3 a visuospatial memory task. In Experiment 4, a loudness manipulation was applied. Mental arithmetic and loudness manipulation affected temporal discrimination of both brief and long intervals, whereas the two remaining tasks did not influence timing performance. Observed differences in interference patterns may be explained by some tasks being more difficult than others. The overall pattern of results argues against two qualitatively distinct timing mechanisms, but is consistent with attention-based cognitive models of human timing.
Rammsayer
Thomas
T
Institute for Pyschology, University of Göttingen, Gosslerstr. 14, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany. trammsa@uni-goettingen.de
Ulrich
Rolf
R
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008144:Loudness Perception / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D008433:Mathematics; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D009622:Noise; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology