title: Effect of semen collection method on pre- and post-thaw Guirra ram spermatozoa.
abstract: In this study, we evaluated the potential effect of the method of recovery (artificial vagina or electroejaculation) on the production and quality of Guirra ram spermatozoa cryopreserved for the possible constitution of a sperm bank. In order to address this question, we evaluated the effect of semen collection method on fresh semen quality parameters, including: volume, concentration, production, microscopic analysis (abnormal sperm and intact apical ridge) and sperm motility parameters determined by CASA system. For frozen-thawed semen, we evaluated motility parameters by CASA and intact apical ridge, acrosomal status, assessed by dual staining by IP and FITC-PNA and capacitation status, assessed by M540 and Yo-pro1, using flow cytometry. The main findings from this study were: (i) that electroejaculation resulted in a lower recovery efficiency (80% of the cases), as a consequence of contamination with urine or lack of response to the electrical stimulation; (ii) the fresh seminal quality was not significantly different between recovery methods, except for the concentration of spermatozoa, but total number of spermatozoa and the consequent number of possible seminal doses for artificial insemination were similar; and, (iii) a higher number of stable and functional spermatozoa (higher number of live non-capacitated cells, higher live acrosome intact cells and live acrosome reacted cells) were found for frozen-thawed spermatozoa collected by electro ejaculation than by artificial vagina. According to our results, we are able to develop both methodologies in the creation of the Guirra sperm bank. Assuming the advantages and limitations of both methodologies, in Guirra breed, would enable the rapid constitution of a sperm bank including samples from a large number of non-trained rams in a short period of time, which will increase the genetic variability, and so guarantee the conservation of this breed.
authors.affiliation: Animal Research and Technology Center, Valencian Institute of Agrarian Research, Ctra. Náquera-Moncada Km 4.5, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain. framarj1@doctor.upv.es
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Marco-Jiménez
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Puchades
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gadea
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Vicente
authors.forename: M P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Viudes-de-Castro
mesh_terms: D000177:Acrosome / Q000648:ultrastructure; D020101:Acrosome Reaction; D000818:Animals; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000662:veterinary*; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005434:Flow Cytometry; D006358:Hot Temperature; D007315:Insemination, Artificial / Q000662:veterinary; D008297:Male; D012661:Semen / Q000502:physiology; D012662:Semen Preservation / Q000662:veterinary*; D012756:Sheep; D013075:Sperm Capacitation; D013081:Sperm Motility; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000502:physiology* / Q000648:ultrastructure; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*