Attitude change and the public-private attitude distinction.
In this paper, we highlight the importance of the distinction between public and private attitudes in research on attitude change. First, we clarify the definitions of public and private attitudes by locating the researcher as a potential source of influence. In a test of this definition, we compare participant reports of potentially embarrassing behaviour and the study's importance between participants responding when a researcher has potential access to their reports (public condition), and participants whose reports the researcher has no potential access to (private condition). Participants high in public self-focus or low in defensive self-presentation reported the study to be more important in the public condition than the private condition. Further, participants in the public condition reported less frequency of engaging in embarrassing behaviours than those in the private condition, an effect not moderated by individual differences. We conclude that the public-private distinction is an essential element in attitude change theory.
Macdonald
Geoff
G
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia. geoff@psy.uq.edu.au
Nail
Paul R
PR
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010555:Personality Inventory; D011639:Public Opinion; D012649:Self Concept; D012919:Social Behavior; D012931:Social Environment; D012938:Social Perception; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology