title: Retrieving text inferences: controlled and automatic influences.
abstract: Bridging inferences contribute to text coherence by identifying the connections among ideas, whereas elaborative inferences simply specify sensible extrapolations from text. Bridging inferences have been indistinguishable from explicit text ideas on numerous measures, suggesting similar longterm memory (LTM) representations for the two, whereas elaborative inferences are inferior. To evaluate the LTM representations of text ideas, we used the extended process-dissociation procedure (Buchner, Erdfelder, & Vaterrodt-Plunnecke, 1995; Jacoby, 1991) to partition the controlled, recollective contributions to text retrieval from the automatic, familiarity-based contributions. The automatic contribution to the recognition of implied concepts was consistently negligible, an outcome consistent with the absence of perceptual processing of those concepts during the original reading. In addition, the controlled basis of recognition was consistently higher for explicit than for implicit concepts, which suggests a more robust conceptual representation for explicit text ideas (Yonelinas, 2002). These results were interpreted to reflect the asymmetric representation of explicit ideas and inferences (elaborative and even bridging inferences) in the surface, propositional textbase, and situational levels of text representation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. m_singer@umanitoba.ca
authors.forename: Murray
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Singer
authors.forename: Gilbert
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Remillard
mesh_terms: D001332:Automatism; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011336:Probability; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012660:Semantics