Support for an explanation of the guidance effect in motor skill learning.
The authors investigated whether the knowledge of results (KR) schedule influences the extent to which intrinsic feedback is noticed and used. Fifty-six participants received KR that was either delayed over 2 trials (Delay-2) or provided directly after each trial (Delay-0) during 160 trials of an unfamiliar aiming task. No-KR retention tests were given after 80 trials and 1 min and 24 hr after the end of acquisition. After retention, all participants were questioned about their use of intrinsic feedback during practice and whether those sources changed as a function of practice. The Delay-2 group performed significantly less accurately on the 1st and last blocks of acquisition trials but showed a significantly smaller performance decline from acquisition to retention. Moreover, the Delay-2 group noticed and used a greater variety of intrinsic feedback sources and its members were more likely to report that their usage changed with practice.
Anderson
D I
DI
Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132-4161, USA. danders@sfsu.edu
Magill
R A
RA
Sekiya
H
H
Ryan
G
G
D000328:Adult; D005246:Feedback; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007721:Knowledge of Results, Psychological; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012153:Retention, Psychology