title: Discriminative ability of the short-form 36 health survey: a tale of two versions.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Previous studies suggested that the Chinese version of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) had smaller variability in the physical functioning (PF) and physical component summary (PCS) scores than the English SF-36. This may translate into differences in discriminative ability and sample size requirement.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data were drawn from a community-based survey and a randomised crossover study of Singaporeans bilingual in the Chinese and English languages. The abilities of the two PF and PCS versions in discriminating subjects who reported chronic illness and acute disease symptoms versus those who did not were compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In all four comparisons (i.e. two health criteria in two studies) the Chinese version of PF showed a larger effect size than the English version. In three out of four comparisons the Chinese version of PCS showed a larger effect size than the English version.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Chinese version appeared more efficient in detecting a statistically significant difference between groups. Other factors being the same, the Chinese SF-36 may require a smaller sample size than the English SF-36 for the studies of physical aspects of health-related quality of life.
authors.affiliation: National Cancer Centre, Singapore. ctecyb@nccs.com.sg
authors.forename: Y B
authors.initials: YB
authors.lastname: Cheung
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Machin
authors.forename: K Y
authors.initials: KY
authors.lastname: Fong
authors.forename: S T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Thio
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Thumboo
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D002908:Chronic Disease; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D016002:Discriminant Analysis; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D011788:Quality of Life; D012846:Singapore