title: In vitro comparisons of two cryopreservation techniques for equine embryos: slow-cooling and open pulled straw (OPS) vitrification.
abstract: Vitrification using open pulled straw (OPS) has provided encouraging results with embryos from other species. The aim of this study was to compare the survival of 6.5- and 6.75-day-old equine embryos after OPS vitrification and slow-cooling. Eighteen embryos were frozen using a slow-cooling method. Embryos were placed in modified PBS with increasing glycerol concentration (2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% (v/v) 5 min each). Embryos were loaded into 0.25 ml straws then placed in a programmable freezer and subsequently plunged into liquid nitrogen. After thawing, cryoprotectant was removed by five steps with decreasing glycerol and sucrose concentrations. Twenty embryos were vitrified using the OPS method. Embryos were exposed to 7.5% dimethyl-sulfoxide (DMSO)+7.5% ethylene glycol (EG) for 3 min and in 18% DMSO+18% EG+0.4M sucrose for 1 min, loaded in OPS and plunged into liquid nitrogen. After warming, embryos were placed in decreasing sucrose concentrations. All embryos were cultured in synthetic oviduct fluid (SOF) medium for 3h and evaluated using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining. The percentage of cells entering in S-phase (%SC) was evaluated by incorporation of BrdU. No significant differences were observed for mean diameter, morphological grade and percentage of degenerate embryos after 3h of culture for slow-cooling and OPS methods. The percentage of dead cells per embryo was similar for the two procedures (42+/-6 versus 46+/-9). The percentage of cells entering in S-phase did not differ significantly between the two procedures (27+/-5 versus 26+/-6). OPS vitrification may be as efficient as slow-cooling for the cryopreservation of equine embryos. However, these results should be confirmed by the transfer of OPS vitrified embryos to recipient mares.
authors.affiliation: INRA, Physiologie de la Reproduction et des Comportements, UMR INRA-CNRS-Université de Tours-Haras Nationaux, 37380 Nouzilly, France. moussa@tours.inra.fr
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Moussa
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Bersinger
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Doligez
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Guignot
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Duchamp
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Vidament
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mermillod
authors.forename: J-F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Bruyas
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002452:Cell Count; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D004121:Dimethyl Sulfoxide / Q000008:administration & dosage; D046149:Embryo Culture Techniques / Q000662:veterinary; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology*; D019855:Ethylene Glycol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D005260:Female; D005990:Glycerol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006736:Horses / Q000196:embryology*; D006358:Hot Temperature; D016196:S Phase; D012996:Solutions; D013395:Sucrose; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D012996:Solutions; D013395:Sucrose; D019855:Ethylene Glycol; D005990:Glycerol; D004121:Dimethyl Sulfoxide