Goal specificity and knowledge acquisition in statistics problem solving: evidence for attentional focus.
Solving training problems with nonspecific goals (NG; i.e., solving for all possible unknown values) often results in better transfer than solving training problems with standard goals (SG; i.e., solving for one particular unknown value). In this study, we evaluated an attentional focus explanation of the goal specificity effect. According to the attentional focus view, solving NG problems causes attention to be directed to local relations among successive problem states, whereas solving SG problems causes attention to be directed to relations between the various problem states and the goal state. Attention to the former is thought to enhance structural knowledge about the problem domain and thus promote transfer. Results supported this view because structurally different transfer problems were solved faster following NG training than following SG training. Moreover, structural knowledge representations revealed more links depicting local relations following NG training and more links to the training goal following SG training. As predicted, these effects were obtained only by domain novices.
Trumpower
David L
DL
Department of Psychology, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2672, USA. trumpower@marshall.edu
Goldsmith
Timothy E
TE
Guynn
Melissa J
MJ
D001288:Attention; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D013223:Statistics as Topic