[Percutaneous coronary intervention in myocardial infarction. Current concepts].
Percutaneous mechanical reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation has proved to be the most effective way of quickly restoring adequate flow in the affected coronary artery. Randomized clinical trials have shown that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is superior to thrombolysis. Initial fears about the use of stents in primary angioplasty vanished when clinical studies demonstrated that they gave better results than those obtained under optimal conditions with balloon angioplasty. The need to transfer patients to a cardiac catheterization laboratory for primary PCI does not decrease the efficacy of this form of treatment, which remains superior to immediate thrombolysis at the admitting hospital. Distal embolization can alter the situation by preventing myocardial reperfusion. Although there are many therapeutic strategies for managing thrombotic lesions, only early administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, direct stenting, and use of an X-Sizer device followed by stent implantation have been shown in randomized studies to lead to significant improvements in clinical or angiographic parameters. No technique has been shown to prevent damage due to myocardial reperfusion. However, it would be difficult to improve upon the good results achieved with PCI in the majority of patients. Rescue PCI is indicated when thrombolysis appears to have failed, especially when a catheterization laboratory is close by or when patients can be transferred early to a center with angioplasty facilities. For most cases of cardiogenic shock, PCI is the only therapeutic modality currently recommended.
García
Eulogio
E
Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España. ejgarcia@retemail.es
D015906:Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000628:therapy*; D015607:Stents; D017131:Thrombectomy