Stability of the diagnosis of first-episode psychosis made in an emergency setting.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed at evaluating the stability of the first psychotic episode diagnosis in the emergency context.


METHODS
Fifty-nine patients were selected during a 15-month period and were followed for an average of 19.35 +/- 6.12 months. The admission and discharge emergency diagnosis were compared with the longitudinal diagnosis, obtained by the application of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders--clinical version at the end of the follow-up. Severity rating scales (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression) were applied in the emergency assessment.


RESULTS
Agreement between admission emergency diagnosis and longitudinal diagnosis was unsatisfactory (k=0.25), whereas that between emergency discharge and longitudinal diagnosis was satisfactory (k=0.57). Brief psychotic disorder diagnosis presented higher sensitivity rates but low specificity, comprising several false positives. Bipolar disorder had the highest rates of specificity.


CONCLUSIONS
Brief psychotic disorder may not be a useful concept in the emergency assessment. A short period of observation can improve emergency psychiatric diagnosis.
Rufino
Armanda C T B F
AC
Psychiatry Division of the Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine of Santa Catarina Federal University, 88040-970 Florianópolis, Brazil.
Uchida
Ricardo R
RR
Vilela
José A A
JA
Marques
João M A
JM
Zuardi
Antonio W
AW
Del-Ben
Cristina M
CM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001938:Brazil; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*